Rotational Forceps Research Articles

Rotational Forceps: Which technique is superior for blade insertion? A simulation study comparing direct, first posterior, and wandering maneuvers

ObjectiveThe Kielland’s forceps is the most used forceps for assisting rotational operative births. There are various maneuvers described for blade insertion. Among these, the most used ones are the direct, first posterior, and wandering maneuver. The objective of this study was to compare these three maneuvers using a simulator. Study designIn this experimental study, 144 rotational forceps-assisted births were conducted using a simulation model, with 72 starting in a right occiput-transverse position and 72 in a left occiput-transverse position. Each of the three maneuvers (direct, first posterior, or wandering) for blade insertion was performed 48 times by a total of 6 operators, comprising 3 obstetricians with over 10 years of experience and 3 trainees.The assessment of forceps application included evaluating the placement of the blades in terms of asymmetry and the distance from the lock to the posterior fontanelle. Additionally, the study evaluated the number of reinsertions and relocations required, the perceived difficulty of the procedure, and the operator’s level of experience. ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in terms of asymmetry with the three maneuvers. Regarding the distance from the lock to the posterior fontanelle, the best results were obtained with the direct maneuver. There were no differences in the number of reinsertions, relocations, and the perceived difficulty by the operators among the three maneuvers. Experienced obstetricians had better outcomes in terms of the need for reinsertions. ConclusionThe direct maneuver offer advantages in the insertion of blades for rotational forceps.

A national survey of clinicians’ opinions of rotational vaginal births

IntroductionMalposition of the fetal head, defined as occiput transverse or posterior positions, occurs in approximately 5% of births. At full cervical dilatation, fetal malposition is associated with an increased risk of rotational vaginal birth. There are three different rotational methods: manual rotation, rotational ventouse or rotational (Kielland’s) forceps. In the absence of robust evidence, it is not currently known which of the three methods is most efficacious, and safest for parents and babies. ObjectiveTo gain greater insights into opinions and preferences of rotational birth to explore the acceptability and feasibility of performing a randomised trial comparing different rotational methods. Material and methodsA survey was sent via email to obstetricians from the British Maternal Fetal Medicine Society, as well as expert obstetricians and active academics in ongoing research in the UK. The questions focussed on perceived competence, preferred rotational method, location (theatre or labour room), willingness to recruit to an RCT, and its outcome measures. Closed questions were followed by the option of free text to allow further comments. The free text answers underwent thematic analysis. Results252 consultant obstetricians responded. The majority stated they were competent in performing manual rotation (88.1%). Half felt proficient using Kielland’s rotational forceps (54.4%). Most obstetricians felt skilled in rotational ventouse (76.2%). Manual rotation was the preferred first rotational method of choice in cases of both occiput transverse and posterior positions. The decision for which rotational method to attempt first was considered case-dependent by many. Two thirds of obstetricians would usually conduct rotational births in theatre (67.9%). Over half (52%) do not routinely use intrapartum ultrasound. Most (62.7%) would be willing to recruit to a randomised controlled trial comparing manual versus instrumental rotation. Over half (57.2%) would be willing to recruit to the same RCT if they were the most senior doctor competent in rotational vaginal birth supervising a junior. ConclusionThere is a wide range of practice in conducting rotational vaginal births in the UK. An RCT to investigate the impact of different rotational methods on outcome would be both feasible and desirable, especially in research-active hospitals.

Maternal and Neonatal Complications Following Kielland's Rotational Forceps Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

(Abstracted from BJOG 2023;130:856–864) Fetal malposition as labor advances can contribute to many risks and adverse outcomes. One method of management is Kielland rotational forceps delivery (KRFD); previous research has yielded conflicting evidence about the safety and effectiveness of KRFD compared with other delivery methods.

The Art of Kielland rotational forceps delivery. Do we need more training or should we abandon it? That is the question: A retrospective observational study

The Art of Kielland rotational forceps delivery. Do we need more training or should we abandon it? That is the question: A retrospective observational study

Maternal health in Sri Lanka: 75 years of national commitment towards excellence

Sri Lanka has a legacy of religious and cultural practices promoting health, and its rulers have been responsive to health needs of the populace. The healthcare milieu that prevailed in the pre-colonial and colonial periods favorably influenced the evolution of maternal health in the last 75 years. Since independence, maternal health in the country improved in many dimensions and directions, in the backdrop of multiple sociodemographic changes and geopolitical fluxes, while far-reaching advances in the medico-technological and communication fields were taking place at global level.By 1948, maternal health services were extensive with maternity hospitals, midwifery training school and functional health units in place. The establishment of a cadre of government-trained midwives instead of training traditional birth attendants (TBAs) was a key policy decision that brought long-term dividends. The WHO supported training primary health care workers even before opening their country office in 1952. In the early days, obstetricians relied mostly on their skills to conduct dexterous maneuvers with the generous use of rotational forceps rather than resorting to abdominal deliveries.The Family Planning Association was founded in 1953, which introduced family planning services to the country till the government took over the subject in 1958. A rigorous campaign (punchi pawla raththaran), promoting sterilization was conducted for population control in 1974, which resulted in the total fertility rate coming down significantly.Maternal Death Surveillance and Response system (MDSR) was established in 1981 which has been recognized globally as a success and is being upscaled to a confidential Inquiry status. Commitment and untiring efforts of the Ministry of Health: Family Health Bureau, professional organizations, development partners including the WHO, have contributed for the achievements in the area of women’s health.

Maternal Health in Sri Lanka: 75 years of national commitment towards excellence.

Sri Lanka has a legacy of religious and cultural practices promoting health, and its rulers have been responsive to health needs of the populace. The healthcare milieu that prevailed in the pre-colonial and colonial periods favorably influenced the evolution of maternal health in the last 75 years. Since independence, maternal health in the country improved in many dimensions and directions, in the backdrop of multiple sociodemographic changes and geopolitical fluxes, while far-reaching advances in the medico-technological and communication fields were taking place at global level. By 1948, maternal health services were extensive with maternity hospitals, midwifery training school and functional health units in place. The establishment of a cadre of government-trained midwives instead of training traditional birth attendants (TBAs) was a key policy decision that brought long-term dividends. The WHO supported training primary health care workers even before opening their country office in 1952. In the early days, obstetricians relied mostly on their skills to conduct dexterous maneuvers with the generous use of rotational forceps rather than resorting to abdominal deliveries. The Family Planning Association was founded in 1953, which introduced family planning services to the country till the government took over the subject in 1958. A rigorous campaign (punchi pawla raththaran), promoting sterilization was conducted for population control in 1974 ,which resulted in the total fertility rate coming down significantly. Maternal Death Surveillance and Response system (MDSR) was established in 1981 which has been recognized globally as a success and is being upscaled to a confidential Inquiry status. Commitment and untiring efforts of the Ministry of health: Family Health Bureau, professional organizations, development partners including the WHO, have contributed for the achievements in the area of women's health.

Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

There is conflicting evidence regarding the safety of Kielland's rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) in comparison with other modes of delivery for the management of persistent fetal malposition in the second stage of labour. To derive estimates of risks of maternal and neonatal complications following KRFD, compared with rotational ventouse delivery (RVD), non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD) or a second-stage caesarean section (CS), from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Standard search methodology, as recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Case series, prospective or retrospective cohort studies and population-based studies. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model was used to derive weighted pooled estimates of maternal and neonatal complications. Thirteen studies were included. For postpartum haemorrhage there was no significant difference between Kielland's and ventouse delivery; the rate was lower in Kielland's delivery compared with non-rotational forceps (RR0.79, 95%CI 0.65-0.95) and second-stage CS (RR0.45, 95%CI 0.36-0.58). There were no differences in the rates of anal sphincter injuries or admission to neonatal intensive care. Rates of shoulder dystocia were higher with Kielland's delivery compared with ventouse delivery (RR1.79, 95%CI 1.08-2.98), but rates of neonatal birth trauma were lower (RR0.49, 95%CI 0.26-0.91). There were no differences seen in the rates of 5-min APGAR score < 7 between Kielland's delivery and other instrumental births, but they were lower when compared with second-stage CS (RR0.47, 95%CI 0.23-0.97). Kielland's rotational forceps delivery is a safe option for the management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labour.

Mitigating the stress of transition: An exploration of the effects and effectiveness of a preparatory course for junior obstetric trainees transitioning to senior training roles

BackgroundAttrition amongst obstetrics trainees is high worldwide and attributed to sources of stress and burnout. The role of formal education and simulation as a means to prepare trainees for stressful periods such as transition into senior roles is underexplored. ObjectiveThis study set out to explore whether the creation of a dedicated educational intervention might positively influence burnout and self-estimated preparedness for practice among obstetric trainees transitioning into more senior roles. Study designA six-week preparatory training programme for year 2 trainees was created specifically for this study. The intervention used the flipped classroom design incorporating online learning that prepared participants for six simulation-based workshops. Participants were randomised by training cluster into an intervention group (n = 4) who participated in the educational intervention and a control group (n = 7) who received standard online and workplace training. The effects on trainee well-being was assessed using the Maslach burnout inventory (MBI) and a self-report questionnaire estimating preparedness for practice. Technical and non-technical skills were assessed using standardised OSAT and NOTSS assessment tools. The primary outcomes were MBI and preparedness for practice scores. Secondary outcomes included OSAT and NOTSS scores. Group comparisons were made using by t-test or Pearson Chi2 analysis where appropriate. ResultsThe study indicated a positive, non-significant trend in pre-post burnout scores in the intervention group. The following improving trends were noted in all subscales: emotional exhaustion 21.5 ± 2.6 (pre-intervention 23 ± 6.2); depersonalisation 9.8 ± 4.0 (pre-intervention 12.3 ± 2.8); personal accomplishment 35.5 ± 6.51 (pre-intervention 33 ± 5.5). The educational intervention engendered an increase in self estimated preparedness for practice amongst the intervention group (p = 0.006). From a training perspective, increased preparedness was noted for the following practical skills: forceps delivery (p = 0.0001), rotational forceps delivery (p = 0.02), delivery of twins vaginally (p = 0.0007) and performing a pudendal block (p = 0.001). ConclusionThis is one of the first studies to investigate whether the provision of a targeted training module can improve burnout scores and preparedness for practice amongst obstetrics trainees at an important time of transition. The positive but largely non-significant findings of this study should be examined in larger longitudinal and adequately powered studies.

Comparison of Perinatal Outcomes for All Modes of Second Stage Delivery in Obstetric Theaters: A Retrospective Observational Study

(BJOG. 2021;128:1248–1255) The World Health Organization recommend techniques to encourage vaginal delivery to mitigate unnecessary cesarean deliveries and the associated complications. These techniques include Keilland’s rotational forceps delivery, direct forceps delivery, manual rotation followed by forceps delivery, or ventouse delivery. Although this study demonstrated that Keilland’s rotational forceps delivery may be associated with successful vaginal delivery, some clinicians currently avoid instrumental delivery to evade maternal or neonatal harm, which ultimately leads to less skilled instrumental delivery and therefore, a riskier alternative. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of instrumental vaginal delivery techniques. In addition, it compared adverse perinatal outcomes between instrumental delivery and primary emergency cesarean section at full dilation (pEmCS).

Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps

We compared complications in pregnancies that had Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) with non-rotational forceps delivery (NRFD). Maternal outcomes included post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS); neonatal outcomes included admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 5-minute Apgar scores <7, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), jaundice, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma. The study population included 491 (2.1%) requiring KRFD, 1,257 (5.3%) requiring NRFD and 22,111 (93.0%) that had SVD. In pregnancies with NRFD compared to KRFD, there was higher incidence of OASIS (8.5% vs. 4.7%; p = .006) and a non-significant increased trend for PPH (15.0% vs. 12.4%; p = .173). There was no significant difference in rates of admission to NICU (p = .628), 5-minute Apgar score <7 (p = .375), HIE (p = .532), jaundice (p = .809), severe shoulder dystocia (p = .507) or birth trauma (p = .514). Our study demonstrates that KRFD has lower rates of maternal complications compared to NRFD whilst the rates of neonatal complications are similar. IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? Kielland’s rotational forceps is used for achieving vaginal delivery in pregnancies with failure to progress in second stage of labour secondary to fetal malposition. The use of Kielland’s forceps has significantly declined in the last few decades due to concerns about an increased risk of maternal and neonatal complications, despite the absence of any major studies demonstrating this increased risk. What do the results of this study add? There are some studies which compare the risks in pregnancies delivering by Kiellands forceps with rotational ventouse deliveries but there is limited evidence comparing the risks of rotational with non-rotational forceps deliveries. Our study compares the major maternal and neonatal complications in a large cohort of pregnancies undergoing rotational vs. non-rotational forceps deliveries. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The results of our study demonstrate that maternal and neonatal complications in pregnancies delivering by Kielland’s rotational forceps undertaken by appropriately trained obstetricians are either lower or similar to those delivering by non-rotational forceps. Consideration should be given to ensure that there is appropriate training provided to obstetricians to acquire skills in using Kielland’s forceps.

Rotational forceps: a retrospective study evaluating anatomical and functional consequences for the pelvic floor.

The use of Kielland's rotational forceps is considered to involve greater technical difficulty and may be associated with a higher rate of pelvic floor trauma. Our main objective was to evaluate the association between avulsion of the levator muscle and rotational and non-rotational forceps. This was an observational study carried out at a tertiary hospital that recruited singleton cephalic vaginally primiparous women with previous Kielland's forceps delivery between March 2012 and May 2017. Patients were retrieved from a local database, contacted consecutively and blinded to all clinical data. Power calculations determined a sample of n = 160 patients. All women underwent a urogynecological interview, clinical examination and 4D translabial ultrasound (TLUS). The 4D TLUS volumes were stored and analyzed offline by an experienced ultrasound examiner who was blinded to all clinical data. A total of 165 patients were available for analysis. Rotational forceps accounted for 27.3% (45 out of 165) of the study sample. Avulsion was present in 41.8% (69 out of 165) of all forceps deliveries. On multivariate analysis, rotational forceps was associated with avulsion, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 2.57 (CI 95% 1.20-5.62, p = 0.016). Body mass index at the beginning of gestation was found to be a protective factor, with an adjusted OR of 0.918 (CI 95% 0.847-0.986, p = 0.025). Rotational forceps is associated with a higher avulsion rate than non-rotational forceps, with an adjusted OR of over 2.5. Obstetricians need to consider the potential long-term consequences of performing a rotational forceps for mothers.

Outcomes of the novel Odon Device in indicated operative vaginal birth

BackgroundNo new method of assisting vaginal birth has been introduced into clinical practice since the development of the vacuum extractor in the 1950s. The Odon Device is a new device that employs a circumferential air cuff over the fetal head to assist birth. In this study, the Odon Device has been used to assist vaginal birth for standard clinical indications.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the clinical impact, safety, and acceptability of the Odon Device to women, their babies, and clinicians and to assess the feasibility of recruiting women to an interventional intrapartum research study.Study DesignThis is a nonrandomized, single-arm interventional feasibility study of the Odon Device for operative vaginal birth undertaken in a single maternity unit: Southmead Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom. The Odon Device was used to assist birth in 40 women who required the birth to be assisted for suspected fetal compromise and/or prolonged second stage of labor. The primary clinical outcome was the proportion of births successfully assisted with the Odon Device, and the primary feasibility outcome was the proportion of eligible women who were approached and who agreed to participate. Neonatal outcome data were reviewed at day 28, and maternal outcomes were investigated up to day 90.ResultsBetween October 2018 and January 2019, 298 of 384 approached, eligible women (77.6%) consented to participate. Of these women, 40 received the intervention—the use of the Odon Device. Birth was assisted in all cephalic (occiput anterior, occiput transverse, and occiput posterior) fetal positions, at all stations at or below the ischial spine and with or without regional analgesia. The Odon Device was effective in 19 of 40 cases (48%). Of the 40 births, 21 (52.5%) required additional assistance: 18 of 40 births (45%) were completed using nonrotational forceps, 1 of 40 births (3%) required rotational forceps, and 2 of 40 births (5%) required an emergency cesarean delivery. There was no serious maternal or neonatal adverse event related to the use of the device, and there was no serious adverse device effect. There were 4 devices (10%) that were ineffective because of a manufacturing fault. Furthermore, 39 of 40 women (98%) reported a high birth perception score. All practitioners were able to use the device as intended, although some steps in using the device were reported to be easier to perform (setup and deflation of air chamber) than others (application of the device and withdrawal of the applicator).ConclusionRecruitment to an interventional study of a new device for operative vaginal birth was feasible; 78% of eligible women were willing to participate, often expressing an aspiration for an alternative to forceps and vacuum. The success rate of the Odon Device was lower than reported success rates of vacuum and forceps; however, in this study, the device had been used to assist birth for standard clinical indications. There was no significant maternal or neonatal safety concern associated with the use of the device, although the number of births studied was small. Further feasibility study to establish iterative changes to the device, technique, and clinical indications is necessary.

Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries

ObjectivesThe objective of our study was to derive accurate estimates of risks of maternal and neonatal complications associated with Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery (KRFD) compared to rotational ventouse delivery (RVD) or 2nd stage caesarean section (CS). MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study undertaken at a large tertiary maternity and neonatal unit in the United Kingdom between January 2010 and June 2018. Pregnancies with fetal demise, major fetal defects, those lost to follow-up, those delivering by elective or emergency CS in the first stage of labour and non-rotational instrumental deliveries were excluded. The study population included singleton pregnancies delivering by Kielland’s forceps, rotational ventouse, 2nd stage CS or spontaneous unassisted cephalic vaginal delivery; the latter forming the control group. The maternal outcomes examined included post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) and obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS). The neonatal outcomes included admission to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), 5-minute Apgar scores <7, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), jaundice, shoulder dystocia and birth trauma. Absolute risks with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated in the study groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) with 95 % CI. ResultsThe study population of 23,786 pregnancies included: 491 (2.1 %) requiring KRFD, 344 (1.4 %) requiring RVD, 840 (3.5 %) that had a 2nd stage CS and 22,111 (93.0 %) spontaneous cephalic vaginal deliveries. With regard to maternal adverse outcomes, in pregnancies that had a KRFD compared to RVD, there was no significant difference in the incidence of OASIS (p = 0.599) or PPH (p = 0.982). In contrast, the risk of PPH was significantly higher in those delivering by a 2nd stage CS compared to KRFD (27.5 % vs. 12.4 %; p < 0.0001). With regard to neonatal adverse outcomes, in those delivering by KRFD compared to RVD and 2nd stage CS, there was no significant difference in the incidence of admission to NICU (p = 0.912; p = 0.746, respectively), 5-minute Apgar score<7 (p = 0.335; p = 0.150, respectively), jaundice (p = 0.810; p = 0.332, respectively), mild shoulder dystocia (p = 0.077), severe shoulder dystocia (p = 0.603) or birth trauma (p = 0.265; p = 0.323, respectively). The risk of maternal composite adverse outcome was highest after 2nd stage CS (OR 7.68; 95 %CI: 6.52−9.04) and lowest after KRFD (OR 3.82; 95 %CI: 2.98−4.91). The risk of composite neonatal adverse outcome was higher in those delivering by RVD (OR 2.87; 95 %CI: 2.10−3.91), compared to KRFD (OR 2.23; 95 %CI: 1.67−2.97) or 2nd stage CS (OR 2.02; 95 %CI: 1.60−2.54). ConclusionOur study demonstrates that KRFD is a safer management option when compared to RVD or 2nd stage CS for the management of persistent fetal malposition in labour.

Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching

Operative vaginal delivery and, in particular, rotational forceps delivery require extensive training, specific skills, and dexterity. Performed correctly, it can reduce the need for difficult late second-stage cesarean delivery and its associated complications. When rotation to occiput anterior position is achieved, pelvic trauma and anal sphincter injury commonly associated with direct delivery from occiput posterior positions may be avoided. We report the original and novel use of real-time intrapartum ultrasound simultaneously during Kielland's rotational forceps delivery to monitor correct execution and increase maternal safety. This is a prospective observational study performed at the Charité University Hospital in Berlin between 2013 and 2018. Simultaneous, real-time, intrapartum suprapubic ultrasound during Kielland's rotational forceps deliveries were performed in a series of laboring women with normal fetuses and arrest of labor in the late second stage and with a fetal head malposition, requiring operative vaginal delivery. In addition to vaginal palpation for head station, rotation, and asynclitism, intrapartum ultrasound was also used to objectively determine head station, head direction, and midline angle. The operator was not blinded to the ultrasound findings. The delivering obstetrician examined the woman and performed the delivery. An assistant, trained in intrapartum ultrasound, placed a curved-array transducer transversely in the midline just above the pubic bone to display the forceps blades being applied and the rotation of the fetal head in occiput anterior position. In all 32 laboring women included in the study, the blades were applied correctly and the fetal heads successfully rotated to an occiput anterior position with direct ultrasound confirmation, and vaginal delivery was achieved. There were no cases of difficult application, repeat application, slippage of the blades, or rotation of the fetal head in the wrong direction. Maternal outcomes showed no vaginal tears, cervical tears, or postpartum hemorrhage >500 mL. There was 1 case of third-degree perineal tear (3a). Neonatal outcomes included mild hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), small cephalohematoma conservatively managed (n=1), and early-onset group B streptococcus sepsis secondary to maternal colonization (n=1). There were no neonatal deaths. Ultrasound guidance during Kielland's rotational forceps delivery is an original and novel approach. We describe the use of intrapartum ultrasound in assessing fetal head station and position and also to simultaneously and objectively monitor performance of rotational forceps delivery. Intrapartum ultrasound enhances operator confidence and, possibly, patient safety. It is a valuable adjunct to obstetrical training and can improve learning efficiency. Real-time ultrasound guidance of fetal head rotation to occiput anterior position with Kielland's forceps may also protect the perineum and reduce anal sphincter injury. This novel approach can lead to a renaissance in the safe use of Kielland's forceps.

OC05.01: Rotational forceps delivery: a novel role of intrapartum ultrasound for quality control and teaching

OC05.01: Rotational forceps delivery: a novel role of intrapartum ultrasound for quality control and teaching

Looking back: sectio in mortua and the role of the midwife

Operative vaginal delivery and, in particular, rotational forceps delivery require extensive training, specific skills, and dexterity. Performed correctly, it can reduce the need for difficult late second-stage cesarean delivery and its associated complications. When rotation to occiput anterior position is achieved, pelvic trauma and anal sphincter injury commonly associated with direct delivery from occiput posterior positions may be avoided.We report the original and novel use of real-time intrapartum ultrasound simultaneously during Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery to monitor correct execution and increase maternal safety.This is a prospective observational study performed at the Charité University Hospital in Berlin between 2013 and 2018. Simultaneous, real-time, intrapartum suprapubic ultrasound during Kielland’s rotational forceps deliveries were performed in a series of laboring women with normal fetuses and arrest of labor in the late second stage and with a fetal head malposition, requiring operative vaginal delivery. In addition to vaginal palpation for head station, rotation, and asynclitism, intrapartum ultrasound was also used to objectively determine head station, head direction, and midline angle. The operator was not blinded to the ultrasound findings.The delivering obstetrician examined the woman and performed the delivery. An assistant, trained in intrapartum ultrasound, placed a curved-array transducer transversely in the midline just above the pubic bone to display the forceps blades being applied and the rotation of the fetal head in occiput anterior position.In all 32 laboring women included in the study, the blades were applied correctly and the fetal heads successfully rotated to an occiput anterior position with direct ultrasound confirmation, and vaginal delivery was achieved. There were no cases of difficult application, repeat application, slippage of the blades, or rotation of the fetal head in the wrong direction. Maternal outcomes showed no vaginal tears, cervical tears, or postpartum hemorrhage >500 mL. There was 1 case of third-degree perineal tear (3a). Neonatal outcomes included mild hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), small cephalohematoma conservatively managed (n=1), and early-onset group B streptococcus sepsis secondary to maternal colonization (n=1). There were no neonatal deaths.Ultrasound guidance during Kielland’s rotational forceps delivery is an original and novel approach. We describe the use of intrapartum ultrasound in assessing fetal head station and position and also to simultaneously and objectively monitor performance of rotational forceps delivery. Intrapartum ultrasound enhances operator confidence and, possibly, patient safety. It is a valuable adjunct to obstetrical training and can improve learning efficiency. Real-time ultrasound guidance of fetal head rotation to occiput anterior position with Kielland’s forceps may also protect the perineum and reduce anal sphincter injury. This novel approach can lead to a renaissance in the safe use of Kielland’s forceps.

The correlation between the type of forceps application and the rate of levator ani muscle avulsion: A prospective cohort study.

The association between the use of forceps and levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion seems to be clear-cut. However, whether the lesion is due to the mechanical trauma yielded by the instrument or to the intrinsic complexity of this type of delivery, is yet to be determined. This study aims at determining the difference in LAM avulsion rate between Kielland rotational forceps and non-rotational forceps. Prospective observational study with 94 nulliparous women with forceps-assisted deliveries (FD) between July 2015 and January 2016. 3D-TpUS was performed 6 months after every patient's delivery, during which LAM avulsion, and levator hiatus area and anteroposterior and transverse diameters were assessed. A total of 89 nulliparous were studied, comprising 27 rotational-FD, and 62 non-rotational-FD. No differences in obstetric, intrapartum, or neonatal characteristics were observed between study groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the presence of avulsion between cases of rotational forceps (44.4% vs 35.5%, OR: 1.5 [0.6-3.6]), correction of asinclitism of the fetal head (34.4% vs. 40.4% OR: 0.8 [0.3-1.9]) or station (midforceps: 32.8% vs low forceps: 50.0% OR: 2.0 [0.8-5.1]). We have not observed differences in the LAM-avulsion rate between rotational forceps and non-rotational forceps performed by highly experienced personnel in instrumental deliveries.

Rotational Forceps Versus Manual Rotation and Direct Forceps: A Retrospective Cohort Study

(Abstracted from Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;212:119–125) In case of malposition, both rotational forceps (RF) and manual rotation (MR) followed by direct forceps are used to perform rotational operative vaginal birth (OVB), but evidence regarding the safest and most effective method to assist birth in such cases is still unclear. Although higher rates of complications were reported with the use of RF in the past, in recent times it has been associated with high rates of successful vaginal birth and lower rates of adverse outcomes than alternative modes of birth.

Accuracy, reliability and usability of a bladder scanner (UScan) during the childbirth continuum

Rotational forceps and manual rotation followed by direct forceps are techniques used in the management of malposition of the fetal head in the second stage of labor. However, there is widespread debate regarding their relative safety and utility.We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of rotational forceps with manual rotation followed by direct forceps, for management of fetal malposition at full dilation.A retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary obstetric unit with >6000 births per year. We recorded and analysed outcomes of 104 sequential rotational forceps births over 21 months (Jan 2010–Sept 2012) and 208 matched chronologically sequential attempted manual rotations and direct forceps births (1:2 by number). Univariable and multivariable approaches used for statistical analysis. The main outcome measure was vaginal birth.The rate of vaginal birth was significantly higher with rotational forceps than with manual rotation followed by direct forceps (88.5% vs 82.2%, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.31, p = 0.017). Births by rotational forceps were associated with a significantly higher rate of shoulder dystocia (19.2% vs 10.6%, RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.23–4.47, p = 0.012), but not of neonatal injury. There were no significant differences in all other maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two modes of birth.The use of rotational forceps was associated with a statistically significantly higher rate of vaginal birth, but also of shoulder dystocia, compared to manual rotation followed by direct forceps. This is the first study to demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the rate of shoulder dystocia following rotational forceps birth.

Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: A retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveRotational forceps and manual rotation followed by direct forceps are techniques used in the management of malposition of the fetal head in the second stage of labor. However, there is widespread debate regarding their relative safety and utility.We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of rotational forceps with manual rotation followed by direct forceps, for management of fetal malposition at full dilation. Study designA retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary obstetric unit with >6000 births per year. We recorded and analysed outcomes of 104 sequential rotational forceps births over 21 months (Jan 2010–Sept 2012) and 208 matched chronologically sequential attempted manual rotations and direct forceps births (1:2 by number). Univariable and multivariable approaches used for statistical analysis. The main outcome measure was vaginal birth. ResultsThe rate of vaginal birth was significantly higher with rotational forceps than with manual rotation followed by direct forceps (88.5% vs 82.2%, RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04–1.31, p=0.017). Births by rotational forceps were associated with a significantly higher rate of shoulder dystocia (19.2% vs 10.6%, RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.23–4.47, p=0.012), but not of neonatal injury. There were no significant differences in all other maternal and neonatal outcomes between the two modes of birth. ConclusionsThe use of rotational forceps was associated with a statistically significantly higher rate of vaginal birth, but also of shoulder dystocia, compared to manual rotation followed by direct forceps. This is the first study to demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the rate of shoulder dystocia following rotational forceps birth.