Rotating Hinge Knee Prosthesis Research Articles

Assessing the impact of distal femoral morphology using Citak's ratio: an independent risk factor for aseptic loosening in rotating hinge knee prosthesis.

Aseptic loosening (AL) is a frequent complication after rotating hinge knee (RHK) prosthesis. Citak's ratio has recently been developed to describe and classify distal femoral morphology into 3 groups (A, B, C). It consists in a ratio between the diameters of the femoral canal at 20cm from the knee joint line and at 2cm from the adductor tubercle. The objective of the study was to identify whether the femoral distal anatomical shape described with this ratio represents a risk factor for AL in RHK prosthesis. Retrospective study of patients who had undergone primary or revision RHK prosthesis, with a follow-up of minimum 4 years. Citak's ratio was calculated, and patients were classified depending on its value. Univariate and bivariate statistical analysis was performed to identify AL risk factors. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analyses were conducted to examine diagnostic quality of the parameters of interest. Thirty-three patients were included. Most of them females (ratio 26:7), with a mean age of 78.2 (SD 6.9). Three patients presented AL (rate of 9%), all of them classified into group C (100%). Citak's ratio was significantly related to the AL rate (p < 0.001), and so was the femoral canal diameter at 20cm from the knee joint (p 0.010). The ROC curve analysis yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.922 (CI 95% 0.819-1.000) for the Citak´s ratio. The inner femoral diameter at 20cm proximal to the knee joint line and Citak's ratio help indentify patients at risk of AL after RHK prosthesis, and thus a better planning of the surgery.

Longer term follow up of outcomes following implantation of a modular rotating hinge knee prosthesis: 53 implants at mean 7.6 year follow up

BackgroundRotating hinge knee replacements are becoming more common but have historically had high complication and failure rates. This study is one of the largest to assess the implant survival and patient outcomes of a third-generation rotating hinge knee replacement at a single tertiary orthopaedic centre. MethodsData for consecutive operations at our tertiary unit between 2006 to 2020 were assessed with review of electronic patient and radiology records. The Oxford Knee Score was used to assess outcomes and the Kaplan Meier method used to estimate survivorship. Results53 rotating hinge knees were implanted in 46 patients (13 male, 33 female) at a mean age of 67.8 years. 21 were primary and 32 were revision procedures. Indications for use of this implant included instability, loosening, fracture and infection. Survivorship was 77.8% at the mean follow up of 7.6 years. A total of 29 complications were noted with ongoing pain, stiffness, infection and patellofemoral symptoms being the most common. 8% of unresurfaced patellas required a subsequent secondary resurfacing. The Oxford Knee Score demonstrated a significant improvement from 14.6 preoperatively to 27.5 at one year postoperatively, which was maintained in the longer term. ConclusionThe third-generation rotating hinge knee implant in use at our unit has improved outcomes for patients. The survivorship of the implant is comparable to the published literature, although there is a paucity of data. The complication rates remain relatively high and patients should be counselled appropriately. We advise resurfacing the patella to avoid the need for secondary procedures.

Assessing the influence of gastrocnemius reconstruction on stress distribution of femoral tumor rotating hinge knee prosthesis via finite element analysis.

After femoral oncological knee arthroplasty, some patients suffer from rotating axis fracture, which significantly impacts the life span of the rotating hinge knee (RHK) prosthesis. This research aimed to analyze the biomechanical response of anatomical gastrocnemius reconstruction and assess whether it could reduce the risk of rotating axis breakage by finite element (FE) analysis. A femur-prosthesis-tibia FE model was established using the data from CT scans. The mechanical properties of the RHK implant were quantitatively compared before and after gastrocnemius reconstruction at 6 angles: 10°, 20°, 30°, 40°, 50°, and 60°. Our results showed that gastrocnemius reconstruction effectively altered the stress distribution around the rotating axis, considerably relieving the stress in the fracture-prone region. In addition, the peak stress in the rotating axis, bending axis, prosthesis stem, and femoral condyles decreased variably. In distal femoral resection knee arthroplasty, the rebuilding of gastrocnemius substantially improved the stress distribution within the prosthesis, thereby having the potential to reduce the risk of prosthetic fracture and prolong the overall durability of the prosthesis.

Is a greater degree of constraint really harmful? Clinical biomechanical comparative study between condylar constrained knee and rotating hinge prosthesis

BackgroundThe real degree of constraint of rotating hinge knee and condylar constrained prostheses is a matter of discussion in revision knee arthroplasty. The objective of this study is to compare the tibial rotation between implants in the clinical settings. MethodsAn investigator blinded experimental study was designed including 20 patients: in 10 of them a rotating hinge knee prosthesis (Endomodel®, LINK) was implanted and in the remaining 10 a constrained condylar knee prosthesis (LCCK®, Zimmer) was used. A medial parapatellar approach was performed and implantation was performed according to conventional surgical technique. Tibial rotation was measured with two accelerometers in full extension and at 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion. Pre and postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was recorded. FindingsBoth groups were homogenous in age (73.4 years in rotating hinge knee prosthesis vs 74 years in constrained condylar knee group), sex, laterality and preoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (p > 0.05). The postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was significantly higher in the rotating hinge knee prosthesis group (80.98 vs 76.28).The degrees of tibial rotation measured by inertial sensors in the rotating hinge knee prosthesis group were also significantly higher than those measured in the constrained condylar knee group (5.66° vs 2.1°) with p = 0.001. InterpretationRotating hinge knee prosthesis appears to represent a lower rotational constraint degree than constrained condylar knee systems in clinical practice and it may increase the clinical satisfaction.The clinical significance: Rotating hinge knee prosthesis appears to represent a lower constraint degree than constrained condylar knee systems in clinical practice.

What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery.

What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery.

What's New in Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery.

What's New in Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery.

Résultats similaires des prothèses condyliennes contraintes et des prothèses à charnière rotatoire dans la chirurgie de révision pour instabilité en extension après arthroplastie totale du genou primaire

BackgroundInstability is one of the most common reasons for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Constrained prosthesis can be used for significant ligamentous laxity, but there is not much evidence on the appropriate level of restriction for unstable varus-valgus TKA. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome and survival at a minimum follow-up of five years between rotating hinge knee prosthesis (RHK) and constrained condylar knee prosthesis (CCK) for extension instability following primary TKA. HypothesisFor symptomatic extension instability after primary TKA, good functional outcomes and survival can be achieved with both designs. Material and methodsConsecutive patients with unstable primary TKA who underwent revision with either RHK (n=34) or CCK (n=30) were retrospectively compared. Assessments were performed by the Knee Society Scores (KSS), and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction. Radiological evaluation was made. Complications and re-operations were analyzed. ResultsMean postoperative follow-up was 10.3 (range: 5–16) years for both groups. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups in the KSS-knee (p=0.228) or KSS-function (p=0.324) score, VAS-pain (p=0.563), VAS-satisfaction (p=0.780), major complication rate (p=0.194), or TKA survival at 10years (p=0.091). ConclusionThe present study showed comparable good functional outcomes and survival at long-term between RHK and CCK arthroplasties. Both designs can be recommended for revision of total knee arthroplasty with symptomatic extension instability. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Preoperative mechanical axis has no influence on reoperation rate in primary rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty

BackgroundThe purpose of the study is to evaluate reoperation rate and its relationship to preoperative mechanical axis of rotating-hinge TKA used as the primary implant in complex knees. MethodsPatients subjected to primary TKA with a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis due to primary osteoarthritis between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative mechanical axis was measured using the last preoperative telemetry x-ray image. Preoperative axis was classified according to the type of deformity (varus or valgus) and its magnitude (0-15°, 16-25° or >25°). Reoperation rate (with or without implant removal) was the primary outcome of the current study. We studied if the preoperative mechanical axis (either varus-valgus, or magnitude of malalignment) was related to implant survival rate. ResultsForty-two patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 51.42 ± 31.88 months. The 83.3% of patients presented a valgus axis while the 16.7% presented a varus axis. Need of reoperation occurred in eight patients (19.0%). However, no patients (0%) required implant removal with revision TKA. No association was seen between the preoperative mechanical axis and risk of reoperation (p = 0.16). ConclusionIn selected situations that do not permit less constrained implants, primary rotating-hinge arthroplasty could be a good alternative. Risk of reoperation does not seem to depend upon the preoperative mechanical axis when using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis for primary arthroplasty in non-tumoral complex knees.

Total knee replacements using rotating hinge implants in polio patients: clinical and functional outcomes.

Little evidences are available in the literature concerning the outcomes of total knee replacement (TKR) in poliomyelitis patients with severe knee deformities or degeneration. Encouraging results have been reported concerning the use of constrained implants, i.e., rotating hinge knee prosthesis (RHK), compared to less constrained ones. The purpose of this paper is to report our experience with rotating hinge total knee replacement, using only RHK prosthesis, to determine functional results, complications, and survival of TKR in poliomyelitis patients. We performed a retrospective chart review of 14 patients with a history of knee osteoarthritis following poliomyelitis that underwent primary TKR, for a total of 15 surgical procedure (one bilateral case). Preoperative and postoperative clinical measurements have been conducted for all patients using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Hip-knee angle, recurvatum knee angle, and Insall-Salvati index were evaluated with full weight-bearing panoramic view X-ray preoperatively and postoperatively. The 2-year postoperative clinical KSS significantly improved from the preoperative scores. The average clinical KSS improved from 32,9 (range 3-48) preoperatively to 77,4 (range 60-88) postoperatively (P value < 0.005). The average functional KSS improved from 32,5 (range 10-60) preoperatively to 59,4 (range 30-95) postoperatively (P value < 0.005). TKR is a successful treatment in improving knee function and patient's quality of life. Using constrained implants, especially rotating hinge implants in polio patients with a quadriceps muscle weakness, could be a good alternative to maintain a physiological kinematics and reducing the revision rate due to knee instability.

Similar outcomes of constrained condylar knee and rotating hinge prosthesis in revision surgery for extension instability after primary total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundInstability is one of the most common reasons for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) failure. Constrained prosthesis can be used for significant ligamentous laxity, but there is not much evidence on the appropriate level of restriction for unstable varus-valgus TKA. The objective of this study was to compare the outcome and survival at a minimum follow-up of five years between rotating hinge knee prosthesis (RHK) and constrained condylar knee prosthesis (CCK) for extension instability following primary TKA. HypothesisFor symptomatic extension instability after primary TKA, good functional outcomes and survival can be achieved with both designs. Material and methodsConsecutive patients with unstable primary TKA who underwent revision with either RHK (n=34) or CCK (n=30) were retrospectively compared. Assessments were performed by the Knee Society Scores (KSS), and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction. Radiological evaluation was made. Complications and re-operations were analyzed. ResultsMean post-operative follow-up was 10.3 (range 5-16) years for both groups. At the final follow-up, there was no significant difference between groups in the KSS-knee (p=0.228) or KSS-function (p=0.324) score, VAS-pain (p=0.563), VAS-satisfaction (p=0.780), major complication rate (p=0.194), or TKA survival at 10 years (p=0.091). ConclusionThe present study showed comparable good functional outcomes and survival at long-term between RHK and CCK arthroplasties. Both designs can be recommended for revision of total knee arthroplasty with symptomatic extension instability. Level of evidenceLevel III.

The anatomical shape of the distal femur is an independent risk factor for aseptic loosening following one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge knee prosthesis.

Aseptic loosening (AL) is the second most common reason for failure after one-stage septic knee revision. In this context, the goal of the study is to identify risk factors for AL following one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge implants. We aimed to answer the following research question: How does the anatomical shape of the distal femur represent an independent risk factor for AL following one-stage septic knee revision arthroplasty? Patients, who had undergone re-revision surgery due to AL of the rotating hinge knee prosthesis after one-stage septic knee revision arthroplasty between January 2008 and December 2018, were included. For this purpose, 41 patients with AL after one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge implants and 37 controls without any revision surgery at latest follow-up were included in this study. Using standardized anteroposterior (AP) views of the knee in all patients, we measured the inner diameter of the femur 20cm proximally from the joint line and at a point 2cm proximally from the adductor tubercle. Among the vast majority of AL cases, we identified an isolated loosening of the femoral component. The AL group showd a high distribution of the Type C according to the Citak classification with 75.7%. Contrary to this, with 24.3% (p < 0.001) the amount of Type C cases was relatively low in the control group. Consequently, Type C configurations of the distal femur represent an independent risk factor for AL with an approximately sevenfold higher risk for AL compareed to Type A and Type B. The novel radiological classification system of the distal femur shows that the Type C subtype is an independent and main risk factor for AL after one-stage septic knee revision using rotating hinge knee implants.

Differences in gait kinetics and kinematics between patients with rotating hinge knee and cruciate-retaining prostheses: a cross-sectional study.

[Purpose] Rotating hinge knee prostheses are often used in primary total knee arthroplasty. However, the biomechanics resulting from this treatment remain unexplored. This cross-sectional study compared patient data on gait kinetics and kinematics to assess the efficacy of primary total knee arthroplasty using a rotating hinge knee or other prostheses. [Participants and Methods] Thirty-three participants were assigned to the following groups: rotating hinge knee (n=7); cruciate-retaining prosthesis (n=7); untreated osteoarthritis (n=10); and young adults as a reference group (n=9). Participant data on biomechanical and spatiotemporal parameters were analyzed. [Results] The postoperative course of the rotating hinge knee group was not significantly longer than that of the cruciate-retaining prosthesis group. The knee varus angle and adduction moment of the rotating hinge knee group were significantly smaller than those of the untreated osteoarthritis group. Gait kinetics and kinematics were not different between the rotating hinge knee and cruciate-retaining prosthesis groups. [Conclusion] Participants who had undergone primary total knee arthroplasty with a rotating hinge knee prosthesis had worse preoperative conditions and demonstrated a similar postoperative gait as those who had undergone total knee arthroplasty with other prostheses. Our findings may be used to tailor rehabilitation programs for participants who have undergone total knee arthroplasty with a rotating hinge knee implant.

Long-term competing risks for overall and cause-specific failure of rotating-hinge distal femoral arthroplasty for tumour reconstruction

Rotating-hinge knee prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct the distal femur after resection of a tumour, despite the projected long-term burden of reoperation due to complications. Few studies have examined the factors that influence their failure and none, to our knowledge, have used competing risk models to do so. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for failure of a rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. We retrospectively reviewed 209 consecutive patients who, between 1991 and 2016, had undergone resection of the distal femur for tumour and reconstruction using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis. The study endpoint was failure of the prosthesis, defined as removal of the femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation; major revision (exchange of the femoral component, tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation); or amputation. Multivariate Fine-Gray regression analyses revealed different hazards for each Henderson failure mode: percentage of femoral resection (p = 0.001) and extent of quadriceps muscle resection (p = 0.005) for overall prosthetic failure; extent of quadriceps muscle resection (p = 0.002) and fixation of femoral component (p = 0.011) for type 2 failure (aseptic loosening); age (p = 0.009) and percentage of femoral resection (p = 0.019) for type 3 failure (mechanical failure); and type of joint resection (p = 0.037) for type 4 (infection) were independent predictors. A bone stem ratio of > 2.5 reliably predicted aseptic loosening. We identified independent risk factors for overall and cause-specific prosthetic failure after rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using a competing risk Fine-Gray model. A bone stem ratio > 2.5 reliably predicts aseptic loosening. An accurate knowledge of the risks of distal femoral arthroplasty after resection for tumour assists surgical planning and managing patient expectations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J2021;103-B(8):1405-1413.

Outcomes of Rotating-hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty Following Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

In complex primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), rotating-hinge TKA (RH-TKA) prostheses play an important role. Compared to early fixed-hinge knee designs, new implants that include rotating platforms and improved hinge constructs may offer improvements in both survival and clinical outcomes. We sought to evaluate early survival following complex primary and revision TKA with a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients (n=47, 48 knees) who underwent revision TKA using an RH-TKA system. The mean age was 73 years (range, 37 – 86). The mean body mass index was 29 (range, 16.3 – 45.9) and the median ASA score was 3 (IQR, 2 – 3). As mortality was high, we performed a Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate survival, with death as failure. The median follow-up was 2.5 years (range, 0.07 – 9.8). Revision-free survival was 97% at a median 2.5 years of follow-up. Overall mortality was 46% (17/37) and survival free from death was 69% (49% - 82%) at a median of 2.5 years. Most reoperations were due to infection (5/12), following by wound-related complications (2/12) and hematomas (2/12). A high postoperative complication rate and mortality are evident in TKA using a hinged knee prosthesis in complex revision TKA. If the indication and surgical technique are matched to the complexity of the case, this type of implant offers a feasible salvage procedure.

Rotating-hinge prosthesis for aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: A multicentre retrospective study of 127 cases with a mean follow-up of five years

BackgroundThe use of third-generation rotating-hinge knee prostheses has increased considerably in recent years. The more anatomical design of these prostheses, together with their controlled rotation system that reduces constraints generated by the single degree of liberty, have produced better outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of revision knee arthroplasty for aseptic failure using rotating-hinge prostheses. HypothesisThe rotating-hinge knee prostheses currently used in France provide significant improvements in function and self-sufficiency of patients undergoing revision knee arthroplasty, with outcomes comparable to those reported with constrained condylar knees. Material and methodsA multicentre retrospective study was conducted in 17 centres, under the auspices of the SoFCOT. The cohort consisted of 127 patients (127 knees) operated on before 2013. The main reasons for knee revision were aseptic loosening, major instability, mechanical failure, and extensor apparatus failure. Function and self-sufficiency were assessed using the International Knee Society (IKS) score and the Devane score, respectively. Survival was defined with all-cause surgical revision as the end point. ResultsMean follow-up was 67.3±11.8 months (range, 13–180 months). Significant improvements (p<0.001) were seen in the total IKS score (+42 points), the IKS function score (+12 points), and the knee IKS score (+30 points). Paradoxically, the Devane score decreased by 0.44 point. The 5-year survival rate was 77% (95% confidence interval, 0.70–0.85). Postoperative complications developed in 29% of patients (infection, n=12; aseptic loosening, n=11; and fracture, n=7). DiscussionRotating-hinge prostheses provide satisfactory outcomes of knee arthroplasty revision and remain an effective option for complex cases, confirming our working hypothesis. Self-sufficiency diminishes slightly. The long-term outcomes obtained using rotating-hinge prostheses are, however, less satisfactory than those observed with constrained condylar knees for aseptic TKA revision, and the complication rate is higher, although the population and local circumstances are different. Discernment is therefore in order when determining the indications of rotating-hinge prostheses. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective cohort study.

Spherical center axial hinge knee prosthesis causes lower contact stress on tibial insert and bushing compared with biaxial hinge knee prosthesis

BackgroundMotion axial system may affect contact stress of hinge knee prosthesis. However, it is unclear which axial system provides the better biomechanical effect. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the contact stress and stress distribution on the tibial insert and the bushing of hinge knee prostheses with a biaxial (BA) system and a spherical center axial (SA) system during a gait cycle. MethodsThree-dimensional finite-element (FE) models of the prostheses with different motion systems were included. The comparisons between experimental tests and FE analyses were performed to verify the models. Dynamic implicit FE analyses were performed to investigate the peak contact stresses and stress distributions on the tibial insert and the bushing. ResultsThe peak contact stresses on the tibial insert and the bushing of the BA prosthesis were higher than those of the SA prosthesis during most gait cycles. The contact time on the bushing is short in the SA prosthesis. The stress distributions on the superior surface of the tibial insert in the BA prosthesis were at the posterior side, but of the SA prosthesis were not fixed. ConclusionThe SA prosthesis has a lower peak contact stress on tibial insert and bushing than the BA prosthesis; in addition, the SA prosthesis has a ‘self-adjustment’ mechanism which could disperse high stress on the tibial insert to decrease the risk of wear and damage. The comparison could help designers and surgeons to better understand the future design of rotating hinge knee prostheses which should be able to achieve multiaxial motion and complete weight bearing by the tibial condylar to transmit the axial force better.

Finn/Orthopaedic Salvage System Distal Femoral Rotating-Hinge Megaprostheses in Oncologic Patients: Long-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Amputations.

There is a lack of evidence regarding long-term outcomes of rotating-hinge knee prostheses with distal femoral replacement in a large oncologic patient series. In this study, we investigated the proportion of patients experiencing complications requiring surgery in the long term, as well as the cumulative incidence of implant removal/revision and amputation at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years through competing risk analyses. We retrospectively studied 214 patients treated with a Finn/Orthopaedic Salvage System (OSS) knee prosthesis (Zimmer Biomet) after distal femoral resection from 1991 to 2017. The study end points were postoperative complications requiring surgery. Reoperations were classified as major when there was (1) removal of the metal-body femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation; (2) major revision (exchange of the metal-body femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation); or (3) amputation. Minor reoperations were defined as all other reoperations. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate the cumulative incidence of implant removal/revision or amputation. There were 312 reoperations in 113 patients (98 major reoperations in 68 patients and 214 minor reoperations). Seventeen patients (8%) required ≥5 additional operations, and 21 patients (10%) required >1 major reoperation. Although the number of reoperations decreased over time, major and minor reoperations continuously accrued after 10 years. The cumulative incidences of implant removal or revision for any reason at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years were 22.6%, 30.1%, 34.3%, and 42.5%, respectively. Although most implant removals/revisions occurred in the first 10 years, the risk persisted after 10 years, at a mean of 1.24%/year, mainly due to deep infection (1.06%/year). The long-term outcomes of treatment with a Finn/OSS distal femoral rotating-hinge knee prosthesis showed it to be a durable reconstruction technique. The rate of implant removal/revisions after 10 years was gradual (1.24%/year). Deep infection remains a major late-failure mechanism, and lifetime surveillance for prosthetic problems is needed. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using an Uncemented Metaphyseal Sleeve, Rotating Hinge Prosthesis: A Case Series of 99 Patients

BackgroundHinge knee replacement is a salvage procedure with historically high failure and complication rates. We aim to analyze the use of an uncemented metaphyseal sleeve revision knee replacement in our unit—a third-generation rotating hinge knee prosthesis. This is the largest reported series of this implant with longest follow up. MethodsWe retrospectively identified 99 revision cases performed (2002-2018). In total, 67 of 99 (68%) cases were performed for aseptic etiology, whereas 32 of 99 (32%) cases were performed for infection. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Oxford Knee Score, survivorship analysis, and incidence of revision/reoperations. Mean follow-up was 7 years (range 1.5-18). ResultsAt follow-up, the mean Oxford Knee Score had improved from 10 points to 25 points. At mean 7 years of follow up, 18 of 99 cases had undergone revision giving a survivorship of 81% (90% aseptic). In total, 10 of 18 cases were performed for infection (10%) and 9 of 18 cases were performed for aseptic reasons (9%), of which 5 were for patella resurfacing (2 revision), 2 for failure of bony ingrowth, and 1 for fracture. Twenty-six patients (26%) had complications postoperatively, with patella disorders and reduced range of movement the most common. Patients who did not undergo patella resurfacing were significantly more likely to need revision of any cause (P = .01). ConclusionThis is the largest study of this prosthesis with longest follow-up. It demonstrates good survivorship and improvement in knee pain. Those with infection are at greatest risk of revision. Significant numbers have patella dysfunction/anterior knee symptoms therefore patella resurfacing should be considered when using this implant. Level of EvidenceIV.

Condylar constrained knee prosthesis and rotating hinge prosthesis for revision total knee arthroplasty for mechanical failure have not the same indications and same results.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether there are any differences in outcomes and complication rates between condylar constrained knee (CCK) and rotating hinge knee (RHK) prostheses used for the first revision of total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) after mechanical failure. Methods: Sixty-three consecutive non-septic revisions of posterior stabilized implants using 33 CCK and 30 RHK prostheses were included. Clinical evaluation and revision rate were compared between the two groups at two years minimum follow-up. Results: The CCK group had significantly better clinical outcomes and satisfaction rates compared to patients with RHK (KSS-knee 70.5 versus 60.7 (p < 0.003) and KSS-function 74.9 versus 47.7 (p < 0.004) at 3.7 (2.0–9.4) years mean follow-up. Moreover, the clinical improvement was significantly higher for the CCK group concerning the KSS-Knee (+23.9 vs. +15.2 points, p = 0.03). The postoperative flexion was significantly better in the CCK group compared to the RHK group (115° vs. 103°, p = 0.01). The prosthesis-related complications and the re-revision rate were higher in the RHK group, especially due to patellofemoral complications and mechanical failures. Conclusions: CCK prostheses provided better clinical and functional outcomes and fewer complications than RHK prostheses when used for the first non-septic rTKA. CCK is a safe and effective implant for selected patients, while RHK should be used with caution as a salvage device for complex knee conditions, with particular attention to the balance of the extensor mechanism.

Risk Factors for Aseptic Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Rotating-Hinge Implant

Background: Successful results have been reported in association with the use of a rotating-hinge prosthesis for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of the present study was to identify risk factors for aseptic loosening in patients who underwent primary TKA with rotating-hinge knee prostheses. Methods: The records of 1,235 patients who underwent primary TKA with a rotating-hinge prosthesis at our center were evaluated. A total of 125 patients who underwent revision were further evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 33 patients who underwent revision because of aseptic loosening were then compared with a group of 30 patients who did not require revision surgery. All data, including radiographic measurements, were obtained from records prior to the primary TKA. Results: On the basis of our review of demographic, anthropometric, clinical, surgical, and radiographic findings, we found that higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with revision. The majority of patients with aseptic loosening had loosening of the femoral component. Furthermore, the inner femoral diameter at 20 cm proximal to the knee joint (on both anteroposterior and lateral images) was found to be predictive of revision among those with aseptic loosening. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that an inner diameter of the femur of &gt;19 mm on anteroposterior images had a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 87% for predicting the need for revision surgery in patients with aseptic loosening. Conclusions: This is one of few studies that has focused on determining risk factors for the failure of rotating-hinge prostheses following TKA surgery. Our findings indicate that a novel variable, the inner (diaphyseal) diameter of the femur at the point 20 cm proximal to the knee joint, is an extremely reliable predictor of revision surgery in patients with aseptic loosening. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.