Ropivacaine Infiltration Research Articles

Single-shot intraoperative local anaesthetic infiltration does not reduce morphine consumption after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized study

The infiltration of local anaesthetic (LA), ketorolac, and epinephrine has been suggested to be effective for analgesia after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The part of action of each component of the mixture remains unclear. We investigated the contribution of infiltration of ropivacaine alone on the morphine consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. Sixty patients undergoing primary THA were included in this prospective randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial, after IRB approval and informed consent. Surgical and general anaesthetic management were standardized. At the end of surgery, 80 ml of ropivacaine 0.2% (160 mg) or saline was infiltrated. The primary endpoint was morphine consumption 24 h after surgery. The secondary endpoints were: visual analogue scale scores and opioid side-effects at H2, H4, H8, H12, H24, D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, rehabilitation programme progress, chronic pain level, analgesic consumption, and surgical result at 3 months and 1 yr after surgery. The observation period was 1 yr. Groups were similar for patient characteristic and perioperative characteristics. The ropivacaine wound infiltration did not reduce morphine consumption at 24 h [median (25th and 75th inter-quartile) 27 (17-37) mg in the ropivacaine group vs 24 (18-34) mg in the placebo group, P=0.51] or its side-effects. No effect was found on rehabilitation progress or chronic pain after 3 months or 1 yr, but these were not the main endpoints of the study. Ropivacaine infiltration alone did not reduce morphine consumption at 24 h after operation nor did it improve postoperative rehabilitation.

Combined incisional ropivacaine infiltration and pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre for postoperative pain relief after diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy

Background Preoperative incisional local anaesthesia with ropivacaine is a common method of providing post-laparoscopy pain relief. The pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre also provides pain relief, but the combined effect of these two methods on pain following laparoscopic procedures has not been reported. We investigated the efficacy of combining local anaesthetic infiltration of ropivacaine with pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre on postoperative pain following diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy. Methods This prospective, randomized, controlled study involved 60 patients divided into two groups (n=30, each). Group 1 received 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine injected peri-incisionally preoperatively, with intra-abdominal carbon dioxide removed by passive deflation. Group 2 received 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine injected peri-incisionally with five manual inflations of the lungs with a positive-pressure ventilation of 40 cmH2O at the end of surgery. The last inflation was held for 5 seconds. The intensity of postoperative incisional and shoulder pain was evaluated using a numerical rating scale at 0, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 hours postoperatively by an independent blinded anaesthesiologist. Tramadol was given postoperatively for analgesia. Results Compared with group 1, incisional ropivacaine infiltration combined with pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre significantly reduced dynamic pain at 0 hour, 4 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively (4.1 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.9, P=0.002; 2.7 ± 2.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.3, P=0.035; and 3.5 ± 2.1 vs. 2.1 ± 1.8, P=0.03, respectively). Static incisional pain was significantly relieved at 0 hour, 2 hours, and 24 hours postoperatively (3.1 ± 1.7 vs. 1.6 ± 1.3, P=0.001; 1.4 ± 1.3 vs. 0.5 ± 0.8, P=0.012; and 2.3 ± 1.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5, P=0.038, respectively). Group 2 had more patients without shoulder pain (P<0.05) and fewer requiring tramadol (P<0.05). Conclusion Ropivacaine with pulmonary recruitment manoeuvre provided simple and effective pain relief after diagnostic hysteroscopy and laparoscopy.

Preemptive analgesia by peritonsillar ketamine versus ropivacaine for post-tonsillectomy pain in children

BackgroundPostoperative pain relief is a desired goal after tonsillectomy. Respiratory depression from opioid, bleeding from nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and airway edema all these factors make pain control is judges. Peritonsillar infiltration of a local anesthetic has been used for reduction of post-tonsillectomy pain.ObjectiveThis study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and side-effects of preincisional peritonsillar infiltration of either ketamine or ropivacaine in children undergoing tonsillectomy.MethodsIn this prospective randomized double blind study, 60 children 7–12 years scheduled to tonsillectomy were divided into three groups: the tonsils were infiltrated by 0.2 ml kg−1 ropivacaine, 0.75% in ropivacaine group R (=21), group 0.5 mg kg−1 ketamine in the ketamine group K (n = 20), and 0.2 ml kg−1 normal saline in the control group S (n = 19). All drugs were prepared in normal saline (3 ml per tonsil) infiltrated 3 min after induction of anesthesia and before surgical incision. Surgery was performed by a single otolaryngology fellow using the same dissection and snare technique. Postoperative pain was compared during 8-h period using a visual analog scale (VAS). The fast-tracking score was used to determine the post-anesthesia care unit discharge criteria. Patients were evaluated for: time of first request and the total analgesic requirement, time of first oral intake, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, and hallucination.ResultsIn the post-anesthesia care unit, groups K and R had comparable pain scores that were significantly lower than S group (P < 0.04). Pain scores in the postoperative ward at 2, 6, and 8 h were significantly higher in group S than in K and R groups (P < 0.05). The time of first analgesic demand was significantly longer in R group (5.52 ± 1.7) h than in K group (3.83 ± 0.16) h p = 0.003. It was the shortest in S group (2.57 ± 0.84) h p = 0.001. The time of first oral intake was significantly longer in S than in R and K groups (5 ± 1.72 versus 3.2 ± 1.97 and 3.65 ± 1.72 h) respectively = 0.006. Total analgesic consumption (mg) was significantly higher in S group than in R and K (12. ± 5.3 versus 8, 2 ± 2.3 and 8.6 ± 3.1) p = 0.004. There were no significant differences between groups regarding nausea, vomiting, or bleeding, and there was no other side-effect recorded.ConclusionPerincisional peritonsillar infiltration of both ropivacaine and ketamine was effective in reduction of post-tonsillectomy pain. Ropivacaine was superior to ketamine in reduction of time to first analgesic demand.

Ultrasound guided peritubal infiltration of 0.25% Bupivacaine versus 0.25% Ropivacaine for postoperative pain relief after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective double blind randomized study.

Background and Aim:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common for managing renal calculi. Pain in the initial post operatie period is relieved by infiltration of local anaesthetic around the nephrostomy tract. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine and ropivacaine.Methods:A total of 100 adult patients undergoing elective PCNL—under balanced general anaesthesia were randomly divided into bupivacaine group (Group B) and ropivacaine group (Group R). After completion of procedure, 23G spinal needle was inserted at 6 and 12 O’clock position under ultrasonic guidance up to renal capsule along the nephrostomy tube. A volume of 10 ml of either 0.25% bupivacaine or 0.25% ropivacaine solution was infiltrated in each tract while withdrawing the needle. Post-operative pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) and dynamic visual analogue scale (D-VAS) for initial 24 h. Intravenous tramadol was given as rescue analgesia when VAS >4. Time to first rescue analgesic, number of doses and total amount of tramadol required in initial 24 h and side-effects were noted.Results:Visual analogue scale and D-VAS at 6 h and 8 h in Group B was significantly higher than Group R. Mean time to first rescue analgesia in Group R was significantly longer than Group B. Mean number of doses of tramadol and total consumption of tramadol in 24 h was less in Group R, though not statistically significant.Conclusion:Peritubal infiltration of 0.25% ropivacaine infiltration along the nephrostomy tract is more effective than 0.25% bupivacaine in alleviating initial post-operative pain after PCNL.

Efficacy of continuous wound infiltration of local anesthetic for pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopy

ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy of analgesia provided by continuous ropivacaine wound infiltration after gynecologic laparoscopy. MethodsSixty patients who underwent gynecologic laparoscopy at Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea, between March and May 2012 were randomized to receive either intravenous fentanyl and ketorolac infusion on demand by patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA group, n=31) or continuous wound infiltration of local ropivacaine (CWI group, n=29). Postoperative pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were assessed via a visual analog scale. The number of patients who requested rescue analgesia was recorded. ResultsThere was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the 2 groups, but more patients requested rescue analgesia in the CWI group than in the IV PCA group in 24hours (18 versus 9 patients, respectively; P=0.010). The PONV scores at 12 and 24hours were, respectively, 0.28 and 0.27 in the CWI group, and 0.71 and 0.73 in the IV PCA group (P=0.004). Nine patients requested cessation of IV PCA because of severe nausea or vomiting. ConclusionContinuous ropivacaine wound infiltration was found to be as effective as patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopy. This technique provides good analgesia with less opioid analgesic requirement and few adverse effects.

Analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine and morphine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonic guidance

Background and Purpose:Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe and effective endourologic procedure which is less morbid than open surgery. However, pain around a nephrostomy tube requires good post-operative analgesia. We hypothesize that infiltration of local anesthetic with opioid from the renal capsule to the skin around the nephrostomy tract under ultrasonic guidance would alleviate the postoperative pain for a long period.Methods:A total of 60 ASA physical status I to II patients were selected for a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgeries. Patients were divided into group R (n=30) and group RM (n=30). Balanced general anesthesia was given. After completion of the surgical procedure, a 23-gauze spinal needle was inserted at 6 and 12 O’clock position under ultrasonic guidance up to renal capsule along the nephrostomy tube. A 10 ml drug solution was infiltrated in each tract while withdrawing from renal capsule to the skin. After extubation, the patient was shifted to the post-anesthesia care unit for 24 hours. Post-operative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and dynamic visual analog scale (DVAS) (during deep breathing and coughing) rating 0-10 for initial 24 hours. Rescue analgesia was given in the form of injection tramadol 1.0 mg/kg intravenously when VAS ≥4 and maximum up to 400 mg in 24 hours. Time to 1st rescue analgesic, number of doses of tramadol and total consumption of tramadol required in initial 24 hours were noted. Patients were observed for any side effect and treated accordingly.Results:Time to 1st rescue analgesic, i.e., duration of analgesia in group RM is more prolonged than group R (P=0.0004). The number of doses of tramadol in 24 hours in group R were higher as compared to group RM (P=0.0003). The total amount of tramadol in 24 hours in group R was more than in group RM (P=0.0013). Side effects like nausea and vomiting and sedation were comparable in both the groups.Conclusion:Addition of morphine to ropivacaine for nephrostomy tract infiltration significantly prolonged the duration of post-operative analgesia and reduced the number of doses and total consumption of rescue analgesic in initial 24 hours in percutaneous nephrolithotomy surgery.

Paravertebral Blockade for Day-Case Breast Augmentation

Bilateral breast augmentation is an increasingly popular day-case procedure. Local infiltration with sedation is routinely used for its ease of application compared with the more complex and potentially riskier paravertebral blockade (PVB). We hypothesized that ropivacaine injected by experienced anesthesia providers into the paravertebral space as a PVB was more effective than ropivacaine injected by the operating surgeon (plastic surgeon) directly into the zone of surgical dissection. Forty female patients who were ASA physical status I or II and undergoing bilateral subpectoral cosmetic breast augmentation were recruited for participation in a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: ropivacaine via PVB, or surgical infiltration of ropivacaine. In both groups, the surgeon was asked to infiltrate the appropriate area with either saline (PVB group) or ropivacaine (local infiltration group). Both groups were sedated with propofol, titrated to effect. The plastic surgeon was blinded to the solution injected. Data collected included demographic characteristics, intraoperative cooperation scores, recovery room postoperative nausea and vomiting, analgesia use, and visual analog scale pain scores. All patients were asked to complete a preoperative anxiety and quality of recovery questionnaire and to record their pain scores and analgesia requirements on discharge. The outcome measures were (i) intraoperative patient cooperation as assessed by the plastic surgeon, (ii) propofol requirement, (iii) postoperative pain, and (iv) quality of recovery. Forty patients completed the study. PVB improved intraoperative cooperation (significance of difference P < 0.001, WMWodds = 6.69 with 95% 1-sided confidence interval CI ≥2.85), reduced propofol requirement (significance of difference P = 0.005, WMWodds = 0.35, CI <0.69), and decreased average postoperative pain in the home environment (significance of difference P = 0.007, WMWodds = 0.38, CI <0.73). There were no PVB complications. Only patients from the surgical infiltration group required rescue analgesics (30%, significance of difference = 0.01). In a limited number of patients, we found that PVB is superior to direct surgical infiltration of ropivacaine for bilateral breast augmentation in same-day surgery. These advantages need to be balanced against the potential risks of PVB, especially in an office setting.

The effect of preemptive perianal ropivacaine and ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine on pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of perianal infiltration of ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine added to ropivacainein in the relief of pain after hemorrhoidectomy. Patients in group C(placebo control group, n = 21) received perianal injections of normal saline and those in group RO(ropivacaine injection group, n = 21) received ropivacaine, those in group RD(ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine injection group, n = 19) were administered ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine, prior to the initiation of the operation. Reductions of the VAS score, the frequency with which the PCA button was pushed, and fentanyl consumption were assessed in groups RO and RD as compared to that of group C, and in group RD as compared to that of group RO(p < 0.05). We concluded that the use of perianal ropivacaine injection prior to surgical incision reduced both postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption following hemorrhoidectomy, and the addition of dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine may have an additive effect in postoperative analgesic care.

The effect of local infiltration of ropivacaine on the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain after modified radical mastectomy

The effect of local infiltration of ropivacaine on the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain after modified radical mastectomy

The effect of dexmedetomidine added to preemptive ropivacaine infiltration on post-operative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND: Inguinal herniorrhaphy is frequently associated with persistent postoperative discomfort and pain. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of dexmedetomidine added to preemptive ropivacaine infiltration in patients undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Fifty-two male patients were randomly assigned to two groups: group RO (n = 26) received 10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine and group RD received 10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine with 1 µg/kg dexmedetomidine, both applied via local wound infiltration 2 min prior to skin incision. Postoperatively, visual analogue scale pain score (VAS), fentanyl consumption, the frequency at which the patients pushed the button of the patient-controlled analgesia system (FPB), patient satisfaction, and the incidence of side effects were determined and recorded. RESULTS: The visual analogue scale pain scores were significantly lower until 24 hours after surgery, and fentanyl consumption and the FPB were significantly lower in Group RD until postoperative 12 hours compared with that of Group RO. The total amount of fentanyl consumption and the total FPB were significantly lower in Group RD as compared with Group RO. No significant differences were detected between groups in terms of nausea, vomiting, dizziness, drowsiness, constipation, and urinary retention. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that dexmedetomidine added to preemptive ropivacaine infiltration reduces pain during the postoperative period after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Additionally, it is easy to administer, and has no adverse effects.

Comparison of pre-emptive tonsillar lodge infiltration with ropivacaine versus intravenous tramadol in pediatric tonsillectomies: A randomized placebo-controlled study

ObjectiveTo investigate the placebo controlled effect of pre-emptive local infiltration of ropivacaine and intravenous tramadol in postoperative pain and nausea-vomiting in pediatric tonsillectomy cases. Methods90 children at ASA I-II physical status, who are between 2 and 9 years old, underwent tonsillectomy were included to the study. Patients were randomized into one of three study groups. Group I was i.v. saline group (placebo group), Group II was preemptive 1.5ml 0.75% ropivakain to the tonsil lodge and Group III was preemptive 1mg/kg i.v. tramadol. Hemodynamic parameters and synchronized Maunuksela pain scores were evaluated in the post anesthetic care unit. ResultsThere was no difference in age, weight, sex and hemodynamic parameters of children included to the study groups. Postoperative nausea vomiting was significantly lower in Group II and pain scores at resting and swallowing are significantly lower than the other study groups. Maunuksela pain scores at 2nd, 3rd, 6th and 9th hours while resting were significantly lower in Group II compared with Groups I and III (p<0.001). The comparison of scores between groups I and III were similar. Maunuksela pain scores during swallowing were significantly lower in Group II compared with Group I and III at 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 9th, 12th, 21st and 24th hours postoperatively (p<0.001). While comparing Maunuksela pain scores of Groups I and III, significantly lower scores are determined at 2nd and 24th hours in Group III (p<0.001). Analgesic needs were significantly low in Group II at postoperative period (150±30mg paracetamol) (p<0.05). It was similar in Groups I and III (Group I: 400±40mg, Group III: 360±40mg paracetamol). ConclusionThis study showed that peritonsillar ropivacaine infiltration might produce an effective postoperative analgesia probably due to a preventing effect on sensitization of the pain pathways.

Intraperitoneal ropivacaine or ropivacaine plus meperidine for laparoscopic gynecological procedures

Postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgery is less intense than after laparotomy and patients may benefit from an intraperitoneal injection of local anesthetic and opioids. We aimed to compare intraperitoneal 0.75% ropivacaine with 0.75% ropivacaine plus meperidine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy. At the end of gynecologic laparoscopy, in a double-blind, randomized manner, one of the following injections was given intraperitoneally. Patients were allocated into three groups: Patients in R Group (n=18) were given 0.75% ropivacaine 3 mg/kg in 200 mL saline; patients in RM Group (n=17) were given meperidine 50 mg plus 0.75% ropivacaine 3 mg/kg in 200 mL saline; patients in C Group (n=18) were given 200 mL saline through the trocars. All patients were given diclofenac sodium when they had pain (VAS 3) and 1 mg/kg meperidine i.v. was also given when pain persisted. The pain scores and analgesic requirements during the first postoperative hour were significantly lower in the RM Group than those in the R and C Groups. Beyond that time, the pain scores were similar in all groups and there were no differences in total analgesic requirement in 24 h between groups. The three groups were comparable for shoulder pain and side effects. The intraperitoneal infiltration of 0.75% ropivacaine plus meperidine reduced pain scores and analgesic requirement during the first one hour after gynecologic laparoscopy compared with the intraperitoneal infiltration of ropivacaine or saline.

Peritrocal and Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of peritrocal, intraperitoneal, or combined peritrocal-intraperitoneal ropivacaine on the parietal, visceral, and shoulder tip pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eighty patients were randomly assigned to four groups. Group A received peritrocal and intraperitoneal saline. Group B received peritrocal saline and intraperitoneal ropivacaine. Group C received peritrocal ropivacaine and intraperitoneal saline. Group D received peritrocal and intraperitoneal ropivacaine. The parietal, visceral, and shoulder tip pain were assessed at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using a visual analog scale (VAS). The frequency of the patient pushing the button of the PCA and fentanyl use were also recorded. In visceral pain, significantly lower VAS scores were observed in Group B from 2 to 4 h and in Group D from 2 to 8 h. In parietal pain, significantly lower VAS scores were observed in Group C from 4 to 24 h and in Group D from 2 to 12 h. In shoulder tip pain, significantly lower VAS scores were observed in Group B from 4 to 48 h and in Group D from 2 to 12 h. The fentanyl use and the frequency to push the button of the PCA were the highest in Group A and the lowest in Group D at every time point. We conclude that peritrocal infiltration of ropivacaine significantly decreases parietal pain and intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine significantly decreases the visceral and shoulder tip pain. Their effects are additive with respect to the total pain.

Radiotelemetric and Symptomatic Evaluation of Pain in the Rat After Laparotomy: Long-Term Benefits of Perioperative Ropivacaine Care

Effective relief of acute and long-term postoperative pain is of utmost importance to patients undergoing surgery. Here, we worked on a controlled procedure of abdominal surgery in the rat inducing persistent postoperative pain symptoms for up to 10 days and tested the efficacy of perioperative care with the local anesthetic ropivacaine. Laparotomy was likewise used to implant radiotelemetric probes by which electrocardiogram, body temperature, and locomotor activity were recorded in freely moving animals. We showed that postoperative pain symptoms (mechanical allodynia) measured in periphery of the scar were associated over time with persistent tachycardia, elevated heart rate variability, and loss of mobility. Furthermore, a single subcutaneous infiltration of the local anesthetic ropivacaine in the periphery of the abdominal incision was sufficient to prevent the appearance of allodynia and the associated cardiac and motor signs of pain, monitored by radiotelemetry. These beneficial effects were observed when the infiltration was performed in the perioperative period, but not later. This study on freely moving animals exhibiting long-lasting postoperative pain symptoms and altered autonomic/motor function illustrates well the importance of the timing of preemptive analgesia care with long-acting local anesthetics. Moreover, it emphasizes the utility of monitoring heart rate variability to quantify spontaneous expression of long-lasting postoperative pain. Speeding the recovery time after surgery using perioperative ropivacaine care is of significant clinical relevance because it might limit the risk of chronic pain and postoperative complications. In humans, chronobiological analysis of heart rate variability could also help quantify spontaneous pain expression with minimal emotional bias.

Perineal infiltration with lidocaine 1%, ropivacaine 0.75%, or placebo for episiotomy repair in parturients who received epidural labor analgesia: a double-blind randomized study

Background Episiotomies are performed in approximately 20% of vaginal deliveries and may result in postpartum pain. Perineal infiltration with lidocaine during the episiotomy is widely used, despite an early study showing no difference when compared with saline. Ropivacaine has increasingly been used in the obstetric setting, although not for episiotomies. We sought to compare the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine, lidocaine or saline for perineal infiltration before repair of a mediolateral episiotomy in patients who delivered with epidural labor analgesia. Methods In this double-blind randomized prospective study, infiltration with 15 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine, 1% lidocaine, or saline was performed immediately before initiating the perineal repair. During the first 24 h, the time to the first oral analgesic, analgesic intake, visual analog scale scores for pain, and patient satisfaction scores were recorded. Results A total of 154 patients were included. Demographic data were comparable between the groups. Time to first oral analgesic request was 13.9 h with 0.75% ropivacaine, 17.0 h with 1% lidocaine, and 16.6 h with saline ( P = 0.104); the proportion of patients who did not request oral analgesics were 35%, 54% and 53%, respectively ( P = 0.09). Visual analog pain scores were low and not different between the three groups (ropivacaine 16.8 ± 11.6, lidocaine 12.4 ± 9.7; and saline 16.2 ± 11.5, P = 0.08). Conclusion For the first 24 h, perineal infiltration of ropivacaine, lidocaine, and saline were equivalent in producing post-episiotomy analgesia.

Effet de l’infiltration pariétale d’anesthésique local (ropivacaïne) sur la douleur postoperatoire après prostatectomie radicale laparoscopique sous-péritonéale

Evaluation of the efficiency of wound infiltration of ropivacaine in postoperative pain after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Prospective single institution study included 130 patients treated by extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy from January to March 2007. One hundred and two patients were included and randomised in two groups according to the year of birth (pair or impair). Only patients from the first group (year pair) had wound infiltration at the end of the procedure. The second group (year impair) was the control group. An analogic visual scale (EVA) permitted evaluation of pain at 30 minutes, 1, 6 and 12 hours after the procedure. Use of analgesics after procedure were noted for each patient. In the first group, the median of EVA was 1.44, 1.34, 1.72 and 1.51 respectively at 30 minutes, 1, 6 and 12 hours. In the second group, the median of EVA was 1.28, 1.36, 1.46 and 1.44. We found no statistically significant difference for pain and use of analgesic between the two groups (p=0.71, 0.96, 0.47 and 0.86 respectively at 30 minutes, 1, 6 and 12 hours). Ropivacaine in wound infiltration did not decrease significantly the postoperative pain and must not be used systematically.

Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

The attempt to further reduce operative trauma in laparoscopic cholecystectomy has led to new techniques such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS). These new techniques are considered to be painless procedures, but no published studies investigate the possibility of different pain scores in these new techniques versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this randomized control study, we investigated pain scores in SILS cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Forty patients (34 women and 6 men) were randomly assigned to two groups. In group A (n = 20) four-port classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed. Patients in group B (n = 20) underwent SILS cholecystectomy. In all patients, preincisional local infiltration of ropivacaine around the trocar wounds was performed. Infusion of ropivacaine solution in the right subdiaphragmatic area at the beginning of the procedure plus normal saline infusion in the same area at the end of the procedure was performed in all patients as well. Shoulder tip and abdominal pain were registered at 2, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively using visual analog scale (VAS). Significantly lower pain scores were observed in the SILS group versus the classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy group after the first 12 h for abdominal pain, and after the first 6 h for shoulder pain. Total pain after the first 24 h was nonexistent in the SILS group. Also, requests for analgesics were significantly less in the SILS group, while no difference was observed in incidence of nausea and vomiting between the two groups. SILS cholecystectomy, as well as the invisible scar, has significantly lower abdominal and shoulder pain scores, especially after the first 24 h postoperatively, when this pain is nonexistent. (Registration Clinical Trial number: NTC00872287, www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

Analgesic Efficacy of Pfannenstiel Incision Infiltration with Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL for Caesarean Section

Background. Pain after Caesarean delivery is partly related to Pfannenstiel incision, which can be infiltrated with local anaesthetic solutions. Methods. A double- blind randomized control trial was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of 7.5 mg/mL ropivacaine solution compared to control group, in two groups of one hundred and forty four parturients for each group, who underwent Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: group R (ropivacaine group) and group C (control group). All parturients also received spinal sufentanil (2.5 μg). Results. Ropivacaine infiltration in the Pfannenstiel incision for Caesarean delivery before wound closure leads to a reduction of 30% in the overall consumption of analgesics (348 550 mg for group R versus 504 426 mg for group C with P < .05), especially opioids in the first 24 hours, but also significantly increases the time interval until the first request for an analgesic (4 h 20 min ± 2 h 26 for group R versus 2 h 42 ± 1 h 30 for group C). The P values for the two groups were: P < .0001 for paracetamol, P < .0001 for ketoprofen and P for nalbuphine which was the most significant. There is no significant difference in the threshold of VAS in the two series. Conclusion. This technique can contribute towards a programme of early rehabilitation in sectioned mothers, with earlier discharge from the post-labour suite.

Efficacy of Periportal Infiltration and Intraperitoneal Instillation of Ropivacaine After Laparoscopic Surgery in Children

Postoperative pain is less intense after laparoscopic than after open surgery. However, minimally invasive surgery is not a a pain-free procedure. Many trials have been done in adults using intraperitoneal and/or incisional local anesthetic, but similar studies have not yet been reported in the literature in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of periportal infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine in children undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Thirty patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to one of three groups. Group A (n = 10) received local infiltration of port sites with 10 mL of ropivacaine. Group B (n = 10) received both an infiltration of port sites with 10 mL of ropivacaine and an intraperitoneal instillation of 10 mL of ropivacaine. Group C did not receive any analgesic treatment. The local anesthetic was always administered at the end of surgery. The degree of postoperative abdominal parietal pain, abdominal visceral pain, and shoulder pain was assessed by using a Wong-Baker pain scale and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 3, 6 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. The following parameters were also evaluated: rescue analgesic treatment, length of hospital stay, and time of return to normal activities. Three hours after operation, patients had low pain scores. Six and 12 hours postoperatively, the abdominal parietal pain was significantly higher (P < 0.0005) in group C than in the other two groups, both treated with an infiltration at the trocar sites; mean intensity of abdominal visceral pain was significantly lower (P < 0.0005) in group B than in groups A and C; the overall incidence of shoulder pain was significantly lower (P < 0.0005) in group B patients than in patients of groups A and C. At 20 hours postoperatively, pain scores were significantly reduced of intensity in all groups. Rescue analgesic treatment was significantly higher in group C, if compared to groups A and B 12 hours after the operation. No statistically significant difference was found in length of hospital stay, but children who received analgesic treatment had a more rapid return to normal activities than untreated patients (P < 0.0005). Our study demonstrates that the combination of local infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine is more effective for pain relief in children after laparoscopic surgery than the administration of ropivacaine only at the trocar sites.

Effects of Preoperative Local Ropivacaine Infiltration on Postoperative Pain Scores in Infants and Small Children Undergoing Elective Cleft Palate Repair

Effects of Preoperative Local Ropivacaine Infiltration on Postoperative Pain Scores in Infants and Small Children Undergoing Elective Cleft Palate Repair