Robotic Mitral Valve Research Articles

Routine robotic and video-assisted mitral valve repair in everyday surgery

Routine robotic and video-assisted mitral valve repair in everyday surgery

The Role of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography in Robotic Mitral Valve Repair

Robotic mitral valve (MV) repair is a new surgical technique that uses small incisions. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for conventional MV surgery with the use of a median sternotomy incision. The aim of the present study was to delineate the utility of intraoperative TEE in robotic MV repair. Intraoperative TEE was performed in 22 consecutive patients undergoing robotic MV repair for severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) over a period of 2 years. Before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), TEE was used to define the lesions of degenerative MR and the localization of the prolapsed leaflets, and to evaluate the severity of MR. During establishment of peripheral CPB, TEE was used to guide placement of the cannulae in the inferior vena cava (IVC), superior vena cava (SVC), and ascending aorta (AAO). After weaning from CPB, TEE was used to assess immediately the competency of the surgical repair. Agreement between TEE and surgical findings was excellent: 92.3% (kappa, 0.873) for the lesions of degenerative MR, and 98.5% (kappa, 0.943) for the localization of the prolapsed leaflets. Under TEE guidance, all the cannulae (100%) in the SVC, IVC, and AAO were placed correctly. TEE demonstrated all the patients (100%) had successful robotic MV repairs. Intraoperative TEE is a valuable adjunct in the assessment of robotic MV repair. (Echocardiography 2011;28:85-91).

Robotic Mitral Valve Repairs Requiring Reoperations

: Robotic mitral valve (MV) repairs are performed at many institutions. Repair failures have been attributed to the challenging technology and potentially to the use of annuloplasty band anchoring U-clips. The purpose of this study was to characterize causes of robotic MV repair failure. : A total of 300 patients underwent a da Vinci robotic MV repair between May 2000 and November 2006 by a single operating console surgeon. Standard repair techniques and a Cosgrove annuloplasty band were used in every case. Clinical data in patients requiring a reoperation, as well as videos of their original operation, were reviewed. MV pathology, repair methods, and findings at reoperation were determined. : Sixteen (5.3%) patients required reoperation. Seven (7%) failures occurred in the first 100 cases and 9 (4.5%) in the last 200 cases. Initial MV pathology included isolated anterior (n = 4) or posterior leaflet prolapse (n = 6), bileaflet prolapse (n = 3), and annular dilation (n = 3). Reoperations after their initial operation were required early (<6 months) in 8 patients and later in 8 patients. Reasons for reoperation included CHF (n = 9), hemolysis (n = 4), systolic anterior leaflet motion (n = 2), and endocarditis (n = 1). At reoperation, 7 patients had partial dehiscence of the annuloplasty band. The incidence of band dehiscence was not associated with the use of U-clips and decreased with experience. : Reoperative rates seemed to decrease with increased case volume and surgeon's experience. Repair results using robotic techniques are similar to conventional techniques. The use of U-clips is not associated with a higher reoperation rate.

Robotic vs Open Mitral Valve Surgery: A Comparison of Outcomes

Robotic vs Open Mitral Valve Surgery: A Comparison of Outcomes