Robotic Colorectal Surgery Research Articles

Impact of the new robotic platform hinotori™ in preventing subcutaneous emphysema after colorectal cancer surgery.

In the field of abdominal surgery, including colorectal cancer surgery, robotic surgery has become widespread, and the introduction of new robotic platforms is increasing. As a result, the incidence of subcutaneous emphysema (SE) as a postoperative complication has increased; however, the causes, grade, and perioperative course of SE have not been definitively examined. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate potential risk factors of SE after robotic colorectal cancer surgery. Between November 2022 and March 2024, 244 consecutive patients who underwent robotic colorectal cancer surgery using the da Vinci Xi (n = 190) or the hinotori™ platform (n = 54) were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors associated with postoperative SE were assessed by multivariate analysis using logistic regression models. Moreover, the grade of SE and its perioperative course were investigated based on the two robotic platforms. Postoperative SE was observed in 95 patients (38.9%). Nine patients (3.7%) had severe SE. The risk factors for SE were female sex, older age (≥ 80years), and maximum intraabdominal pressure (max IAP) with CO2 insufflation > 10mmHg (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.981 [1.105-3.552], p = 0.022; 2.765 [1.310-5.835], p = 0.008; and 13.249 [1.227-143.020], p = 0.033, respectively). Additionally, the incidence of SE when using the hinotori™ platform was significantly lower than when using the da Vinci Xi platform (0.302 [0.135-0.667], p = 0.004). Max IAP with CO2 > 10mmHg was associated with SE during robotic colorectal cancer surgery. Compared with the use of da Vinci Xi, the use of hinotori™ was associated with fewer incidences of postoperative SE, especially in females and older patients (≥ 80years).

Experiences in robotic colorectal surgery: comprehensive insights from a multi-center analysis using the Senhance Robotic System.

Robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionised minimally invasive approaches, particularly in colorectal surgery. While many single-center studies on colorectal surgeries exist in present literature, including experiences with Senhance® Robotic Systems, comprehensive multi-center studies are lacking. This study, conducted through the TransEnterix European Patient Registry ("TRUST"), aims to assess the safety and feasibility in this context. The present study explored procedural times, complications, robotic malfunction and limitations, adverse events and pain management outcomes for colorectal procedures, including sigmoid resection, right hemicolectomy and rectal surgery collected in two European centers. Data from 355 colorectal surgeries showed that the median duration of surgery was 147.2min (IQR: 124.3-183.0), the docking time was reported with a median of 3.4min (IQR: 2.0-5.4) and the console time was found at a mean of 84.4min (SD: 33.6). Despite minimal blood loss, pain scores, and robotic malfunction, 2.9% of the cases (10 instances) required conversions to either an open or laparoscopic approach. Further, most robotic limitations were attributed to limited motion (18.9%, 67 cases) and collisions (11.5%, 41 cases). Adverse events (24 cases, 6.8%) were effectively managed, with 23 instances judged completely unrelated to the robotic system. This study underscores the positive outcomes and safety profile of Senhance® Robotic Systems in colorectal surgery, contributing valuable insights for future research and clinical practice.

Robotic colorectal surgery in Latin America: a systematic review on surgical outcomes.

Robotic approach in colorectal surgery is rapidly gaining interest, particularly in the context of rectal cancer resection. Despite economic barriers, substantial proliferation of robotic colorectal procedures has been observed throughout Latin America. However, there is a lack of data regarding intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes, as well as oncological and long-term results. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal approaches across Latin America. A systematic literature search of electronic databases, including PubMed, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Scielo, was performed and reported in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The main target of the literature search was studies that reported outcomes of colorectal robotic surgery in Latin America. A total of 9,694 published articles were identified from the initial search. Nine thousand six hundred thirty-six publications were excluded after title and abstract review and removal of duplicates. Fifty-eight articles were thoroughly reviewed, and 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. The critical appraisal of study quality (biases risk assessment) was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis. In general, the overall study quality was poor. Of the 11 studies included in the analysis, ten addressed intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes, seven addressed oncological/pathological outcomes, and just one addressed long-term outcomes. Ten studies evaluated intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes, encompassing a total of 425 patients, the majority of whom were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Morbidity rates exhibited a range between 0% and 45.9%, while mortality ranged from 0% to 2.5%. Few studies have been published addressing intraoperative, postoperative, pathological, and oncological outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery in this region. Undoubtedly, there are unique challenges not encountered by developed countries, including economic obstacles in establishing structured training programmes and high-quality centres for the development of robotic surgery. Further studies are needed to assess the real extent of robotic surgery in the region and its results. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42023494112).

Learning Curve for Robotic Colorectal Surgery.

With the increasing adoption of robotic surgery in clinical practice, institutions intending to adopt this technology should understand the learning curve in order to develop strategies to help its surgeons and operating theater teams overcome it in a safe manner without compromising on patient care. Various statistical methods exist for the analysis of learning curves, of which a cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis is more commonly described in the literature. Variables used for analysis can be classified into measures of the surgical process (e.g., operative time and pathological quality) and measures of patient outcome (e.g., postoperative complications). Heterogeneity exists in how performance thresholds are defined during the interpretation of learning curves. Factors that influence the learning curve include prior surgical experience in colorectal surgery, being in a mature robotic surgical unit, case mix and case complexity, robotic surgical simulation, spending time as a bedside first assistant, and being in a structured training program with proctorship.

Comparative analysis of safety and effectiveness between natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional transabdominal specimen extraction in robot-assisted colorectal cancer resection through systematic review and meta-analysis.

The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the perioperative and oncologic results of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) compared to conventional transabdominal specimen extraction (TASE) in robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer. A comprehensive electronic search will be performed on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to find research articles published from the beginning of the databases to July 2024 that focus on patients who have undergone robotic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer. Specifically, this review will compare NOSE with conventional TASE. Only studies published in English will be considered. Literature screening will adhere closely to predetermined criteria for inclusion and exclusion, specifically targeting randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. The evaluation of quality will involve the use of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analysis of the included studies' data will be performed using Review Manager 5.4.1. In the final analysis, 9 retrospective cohort studies comprising 1571 patients were included. Out of these, 732 patients opted for NOSE, while 839 patients chose conventional TASE in robotic colorectal surgery. Patients who received TASE experienced enhancements in hospital stay duration, time until first gas passage, wound infection rates, and time until the first intake of a liquid diet. Nevertheless, there were no notable distinctions noted between the two methods regarding surgery duration, projected blood loss, intestinal blockage, or frequency of anastomotic leakage. In patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal surgery, the safety and feasibility of NOSE are demonstrated. Compared to traditional TASE, it provides clear benefits including shorter hospital stays, earlier first flatus, quicker initiation of a liquid diet, and lower risk of wound infection.

Artificial Intelligence Hybrid Survival Assessment System for Robot-Assisted Proctectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) has emerged as the predominant surgical approach for patients with rectal cancer in recent years; although good postoperative patient recovery with accurate prediction is a guarantee of adaptive surveillance management, there is still a lack of easy-to-use prognostic tools and risk scores designed specifically for those patients undergoing RAP. This study used the electronic health records of 506 RAP participants, including a National Specialist Center for da Vinci Robotic Colorectal Surgery (NSCVRCS) meta cohort, and an independent external validation Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital cohort. In the NSCVRCS meta cohort, patients were divided into a discovery cohort (70%, n = 268), where the best-fit model was applied to model our prediction system, RAP-AIscore. Subsequently, an internal validation process for RAP-AIscore was conducted using a replication cohort (30%, n = 116). The study designed and implemented a large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) hybrid framework to identify the best strategy for building a survival assessment system, the RAP-AIscore, from 132 potential modeling scenarios through a combination of iterative cross-validation, Monte Carlo cross-validation, and bootstrap resampling. The 10 variables most relevant to clinical interpretability were identified on the basis of the AI hybrid optimal model values, which helps provide reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients. The consistent evaluation of discrimination, calibration, generalization, and prognostic value across cohorts reaffirmed the accuracy and robust extrapolation capability of this system. The 10 feature variables most associated with clinical interpretability on the basis of Shapley values were identified, facilitating reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients. This study introduces a promising and informative tool, the RAP-AIscore, which can be explained through nomograms for interpreting clinical outcomes. It facilitates postoperative risk stratification management and enhances clinical management of prognosis for RAP patients.

Structured training pathway for robotic colorectal surgery: Short-term outcomes from five UK centres.

The aim of this study was to assess the short-term outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery implemented through a structured, standardized training pathway in five colorectal centres in the United Kingdom. A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted, involving 523 consecutive patients who underwent robotic colorectal resection between 2015 and 2019. All participating centres followed the European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery training pathway. Patient data, including demographics, operative details, postoperative outcomes and pathology results, were collected and analysed. The study included 447 rectal resections and 76 colonic operations. The median age of the patients was 64.7 years, with the majority of patients (70%) being men. The mean body mass index was 27.4 kg/m2, and 89.7% of the patients underwent surgery for malignancy. The overall conversion rate to open surgery was 4.2%. The median length of stay was 6 days and there was no 30-day mortality. The readmission and reoperation rates were 8.8% and 7.3%, respectively. The anastomotic leak rate was 4.1% for rectal resections and 3.9% for colonic resections. Pathological examination showed a positive circumferential resection margin rate of 2.6%. Through the implementation of a structured, standardized training pathway, the participating colorectal centres in the UK achieved safe and effective robotic colorectal surgery pathways with favourable short-term oncological and clinical outcomes. Further studies examining long-term and functional outcomes are needed to assess the broader impact of robotic surgery in colorectal procedures.

SP8.2 - Single centre experience in establishing a robotic colorectal surgery programme in a UK district hospital

Abstract Aim To describe our centre’s experience in establishing a robotic programme for colorectal surgery procedures. Method Demographic, peri-operative and follow-up data from a prospectively maintained database were collected for all laparoscopic and robotic assisted colorectal procedures carried out at our centre. Results 38 colorectal resections were completed with the DaVinci Xi (Intuitive Surgical, USA) robotic platform between April-December 2023. These were compared to a laparoscopic cohort of 57 consecutive colorectal resections. 37% (n=14) of the robotic cases were proctored and all were resections for malignancy. There were 57.9% (n=22) males in the robotic cohort and 50.9% (n=28) in the laparoscopic cohort. There was no statistical difference between the demographics of the two cohorts in terms of age, body mass index and ASA grade. 21/38 (55.3%) robotic resections were left sided compared to 35/57 (61.4%) laparoscopic resections. No robotic cases were converted to open or laparoscopy, but 8.8% (n=5) of laparoscopic cases were converted to open. Laparoscopic procedures were shorter (median operative time 277 min compared to 412 min, p<0.001). A stoma was formed in 13/38 (34.2%) robotic cases and 16/57 (28.1%) laparoscopic cases. All bowel anastomoses performed in the robotic cohort were stapled with 16/32 (50.0%) being intra-corporeal. The median length of stay was 5 days for both cohorts. 5.3% (n=2/38) Vs 12.3% (n=7/57) had a significant post-operative complication (Clavien-Dindo ³3). No mortalities were recorded within 90 days of the procedures. Conclusions Other than longer operative times, robotic colorectal resections in a district hospital setting is comparable to laparoscopic resections.

Low pneumoperitoneum pressure on venous thromboembolism in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled study

IntroductionVenous thromboembolism (VTE) poses a significant risk in colorectal cancer surgeries due to hypercoagulability and the anatomical challenges of the pelvic cavity. With the advancement of minimally invasive techniques, intraoperative strategies for preventing VTE may prove to be effective. This study explores the effects of intraoperative pneumoperitoneum pressures on VTE incidence following colorectal cancer surgeries. MethodsThis single center parallel randomized controlled double-blind, trial involved 302 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery. Patients were randomized to either a standard pneumoperitoneum pressure group (SP: 15 mmHg) or a low-pressure group (LP: 10 mmHg). Primary outcomes measured were the incidence of VTE, including symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT and PE. Secondary outcomes included postoperative D-dimer levels, surgery duration, blood loss, surgeon satisfaction, and oncological quality. ResultsOut of 302 randomized patients, 275 were evaluable post exclusions, with 138 in the SP group and 137 in the LP group. The incidence of VTE was 10.9 % in the SP and 13.9 % in the LP group, with no significant difference between the two (P = 0.450). Secondary outcomes such as D-dimer levels, surgery duration, and blood loss showed no significant differences between two groups. Surgeon satisfaction and oncological outcomes were similarly comparable. ConclusionsThe trial demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of VTE between standard and low pneumoperitoneum pressures. This suggests that lower pressures may not necessarily provide a benefit in reducing postoperative VTE in colorectal cancer surgeries.

Robotic purse-string suture technique for intracorporeal anastomosis using double-stapling technique in robotic resection of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundRobotic three-dimensional magnified visual effects and field of view stabilization have enabled precise surgical operations. Intracorporeal anastomosis in right-sided colorectal cancer surgery is expected to shorten operation times, avoid paralytic ileus, and shorten wound lengths; however, there are few reports of intracorporeal anvil fixation for intestinal anastomosis in left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. Herein, we introduce a simple, novel procedure for using robotic purse-string suture (RPSS) in intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique in rectal and sigmoid cancer surgery and report short-term outcomes.MethodsFrom September 2022 to April 2024, 105 consecutive patients underwent robotic surgery with double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer at our institution. Their data were retrospectively analyzed. Intracorporeal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique using RPSS was performed in 26 patients (the RPSS group), while the double-stapling technique anastomosis with extracorporeal anvil fixation was performed in 79 patients (the EC group). A 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis was performed (matching criteria: sex, age, body mass index (BMI), tumor location and tumor size) using a caliper 0.3.In the RPSS group, after tumor-specific or total mesorectal excision, specimens were extracted from the umbilical wound with simultaneous anvil placement in the body cavity. The oral colonic stump was robotically excised and robotically circumferentially stitched with 3–0 Prolene in all layers. After anvil insertion into the stump, the bowel wall of the colon was completely sewn onto the central rod of the anvil. Reconstructions were anastomosed using the double-stapling technique.ResultsThe matched cohort contained 23 patients in each group. The RPSS group had significantly less bleeding than the EC group (p = 0.038). Super-low anterior resection (SLAR) in the RPSS group had shorter total operative times than those in the EC group (p = 0.045). The RPSS group experienced no perioperative complications greater than Clavien–Dindo grade III or any anastomosis-related complications.ConclusionsThe RPSS technique can be performed safely without any anastomosis-related complications and reduces the total operative times in SLAR and blood loss through total robotic surgery. This may be a useful modality for robotic colorectal surgery.

Objective performance indicators differ in obese and nonobese patients during robotic proctectomy

BackgroundRobotic surgery is perceived to be more complex in obese patients. Objective performance indicators, machine learning–enabled metrics, can provide objective data regarding surgeon movements and robotic arm kinematics. In this feasibility study, we identified differences in objective performance indicators during robotic proctectomy in obese and nonobese patients. MethodsEndoscopic videos were annotated to delineate individual surgical steps across 39 robotic proctectomies (1880 total steps). Thirteen patients were obese and 26 were nonobese. Objective performance indicators during the following steps were analyzed: splenic flexure mobilization, left colon mobilization, pelvic dissection, and rectal transection. ResultsThe following differences were noted during robotic proctectomy in obese patients: during splenic flexure mobilization, more arm swaps, longer camera path length and velocity; during left colon mobilization, longer step time, more arm swaps, higher camera-related metrics (movement, path length, velocity, acceleration, and jerk), greater dominant arm path length, moving time, and wrist articulation; during anterior pelvic dissection, longer energy activation time, camera path length, and moving time; during posterior pelvic dissection, lower nondominant arm velocity, jerk, and acceleration; during left pelvic dissection, longer energy activation time; during right pelvic dissection, greater camera-related metrics (movement, path length, moving time, and velocity); and during rectal transection, longer step time, more arm swaps, master clutch use and camera movements, greater dominant wrist articulation, and longer dominant arm path length. ConclusionWe report step-specific objective performance indicators that differ during robotic proctectomy for obese and nonobese patients. This is the first study to use objective performance indicators to correlate a patient attribute with surgeon movements and robotic arm kinematics during robotic colorectal surgery.

Indocyanine green near-infrared fluorescence bowel perfusion assessment to prevent anastomotic leakage in minimally invasive colorectal surgery (AVOID): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

Anastomotic leakage is a severe postoperative complication in colorectal surgery and compromised bowel perfusion is considered a major contributing factor. Conventional methods to assess bowel perfusion have a low predictive value for anastomotic leakage. We therefore aimed to evaluate the efficacy of real-time assessment with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) in the prevention of anastomotic leakage. This multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in eight hospitals in the Netherlands. We included adults (aged >18 years) who were scheduled for laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery (with planned primary anastomosis) for benign and malignant diseases. Preoperatively, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to fluorescence-guided bowel anastomosis (FGBA) or conventional bowel anastomosis (CBA) by variable block randomisation (block sizes 4, 6, and 8) and stratified by site. The operating surgeon and investigators analysing the data were not masked to group assignment. Patients were unmasked after the surgical procedure or after study end. In the FGBA group, surgeons marked anastomosis levels per conventional perfusion assessment and then administered 5 mg of ICG by 2 mL intravenous bolus. They assessed bowel perfusion using NIR fluorescence imaging and adjusted (or kept) transection lines accordingly. Only conventional methods for bowel perfusion assessment were used in the CBA group. The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage (ie, requiring active therapeutic intervention but manageable without reoperation [grade B] or requiring reoperation [grade C], per the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer) between the FGBA group and the CBA group within 90 days post-surgery. The primary outcome and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered with ToetsingOnline.nl (NL7502) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04712032) and is complete. Between July 2, 2020, and Feb 21, 2023, 982 patients were enrolled, of whom 490 were assigned to FGBA and 492 were assigned to CBA. After excluding 51 patients, the intention-to-treat population comprised 931 (463 assigned FGBA and 468 assigned CBA). Patients had a median age of 68·0 years (IQR 59·0-75·0) and 485 (52%) were male and 446 (48%) were female. Ethnicity data were not available. The overall 90-day rate of clinically relevant anastomotic leakage was not significantly different between the FGBA group (32 [7%] of 463 patients) and the CBA group (42 [9%] of 468 patients; relative risk 0·77 [95% CI 0·50-1·20]; p=0·24). No adverse events related to ICG use were observed. 313 serious adverse events in 229 (25%) patients were at 90-day follow-up (159 serious adverse events in 113 [24%] patients in the FGBA group and 154 serious adverse events in 116 [25%] patients in the CBA group). 18 (2%) people died by 90 days (ten in the FGBA group and eight in the CBA group). ICG NIR fluorescence imaging did not reduce 90-day anastomotic leakage rates in this trial across all types of colorectal surgeries. Further research should be done in subgroups, such as rectosigmoid resections, for which evidence suggests ICG NIR might be beneficial. Olympus Medical, Diagnostic Green, and Intuitive Foundation.

First clinical experience using augmented intelligence in robotic colorectal surgery with the Senhance robotic platform.

First clinical experience using augmented intelligence in robotic colorectal surgery with the Senhance robotic platform.

Robotic colorectal surgery training: Portsmouth perspective.

This study aims to discuss the principles and pillars of robotic colorectal surgery training and share the training pathway at Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust. A narrative review is presented to discuss all the relevant and critical steps in robotic surgical training. Robotic training requires a stepwise approach, including theoretical knowledge, case observation, simulation, dry lab, wet lab, tutored programs, proctoring (in person or telementoring), procedure-specific training, and follow-up. Portsmouth Colorectal has an established robotic training model with a safe stepwise approach that has been demonstrated through perioperative and oncological results. Robotic surgery training should enable a trainee to use the robotic platform safely and effectively, minimize errors, and enhance performance with improved outcomes. Portsmouth Colorectal has provided such a stepwise training program since 2015 and continues to promote and augment safe robotic training in its field. Safe and efficient training programs are essential to upholding the optimal standard of care.

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study on surgical outcomes and long-term survival.

Although the safety and short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients are well-documented, there is limited research on the long-term survival outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery. This is a retrospective study that includes 502 patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer between August 2016 and September 2021. All patients were diagnosed with rectal or sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to minimize selection bias. Perioperative outcomes, complication rates, and pathological data were evaluated and compared. The 5-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were calculated and compared. Before matching, patients in the robotic group had earlier pathological T and N stages and were more likely to have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to the laparoscopic group. After matching, most clinicopathological outcomes were similar between the two groups, but the robotic group had longer operative times and a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic group. After matching for clinical factors, the 5-year DFS rates were 88.19% for the robotic group and 82.46% for the laparoscopic group (P = 0.122), and the OS rates were 90.5% and 79.5% (P = 0.342), showing no significant differences. In the stratified analysis, patients in the robotic surgery group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates in the following subgroups: age < 65years, TNM stage I-II, received neoadjuvant therapy, and primary tumor located in the rectum. The safety and efficacy of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer were validated compared to laparoscopic surgery, with both groups of patients exhibiting comparable long-term prognoses.

The Learning Curve for Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Rectal Cancer: A View from the West.

Lateral pelvic lymph-node dissection is performed for selected patients with rectal cancer with persistent lateral nodal disease after neoadjuvant therapy. This technique has been slow to be adopted in the West due to concerns regarding technical difficulty. This is the first report on the learning curve for lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the US or Europe. The aim of this study was to analyze the learning curve associated with robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Retrospective observational cohort. Tertiary academic cancer center. Consecutive patients from 2012 to 2021. All patients underwent robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The primary endpoints were the learning curves for maximum number of nodes retrieved and urinary retention which was evaluated with simple cumulative-sum and two-sided Bernoulli cumulative-sum charts. Fifty-four procedures were included. A single-surgeon (n = 35) and an institutional learning curve are presented in the analysis. In the single-surgeon learning curve, a turning point marking the end of a learning phase was detected at the 12th procedure for the number of retrieved nodes and at the 20th for urinary retention. In the institutional learning curve analysis, two turning points were identified at the 13th and 26th procedures indicating progressive improvements for the number of retrieved nodes and at the 27th for urinary retention. No sustained alarm signals were detected at any time point. The retrospective nature, small sample size and the referral center nature of the reporting institution that may limit generalizability. In a setting of institutional experience with robotic colorectal surgery including beyond TME resections, the learning curve for robotic lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is acceptably short. Our results demonstrate feasibility of acquisition of this technique in a controlled setting, with sufficient case volume and proctoring can optimize the learning curve. See Video Abstract.

Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Analysis of the First Three Years of Activity in a Hospital of the Portuguese National Health Service

Minimally invasive surgery has been increasingly accepted and used in colorectal surgery. Several studies report that robotic surgery may provide advantages over 'conventional' laparoscopy, namely in rectal surgery. This paper provides an account of the first three years of experience with robotic surgery in the Unidade de Patologia Colorretal of the Unidade Local de Saúde S. José. Variables were defined to develop a prospective database containing the data of consecutive patients operated by three internationally certified colorectal surgeons using the Da Vinci Xi® system between November 2019 and October 2022. The database was converted into an anonymized version that was used for this study. The analysis was performed on the data of all the patients operated during this period. Eighty patients were included, 47 male, median age 70 years, and median BMI 26 kg/m2 . ASA score was II in 53.7% and III in 41.3% of pa- tients. Of the total, 97.6% had malignant or potentially malignant disease. Operative procedures consisted of 34 colectomies proximal to the splenic flexure, 20 distal colectomies and 26 anterior resections. There were two synchronous resections of liver metastases. Early perioperative outcomes and histopathological results were analyzed: median operative time: 300 minutes; median estimated blood loss: 50 mL; conversion rate: 2.5%; median days until first bowel movement: three days; median length of hospital stay: six days; complication rate: 20%, of which 5% were Clavien III and 0% Clavien IV/V; anastomotic leak rate: 2.5%; 30-day readmission rate: 1.3%; median lymph nodes resected: 20; R0 resection rate: 100%; mesorectal integrity rate: 95,8% complete/near complete. Our results show that the adoption of robotic colorectal surgery in our center was safe and resulted in similar or improved short-term clinical outcomes and histopathological results when compared to those described in the literature.

39 Patient Perceptions of and Postoperative Satisfaction with Colorectal Robotic Surgery: A Qualitative Insight

39 Patient Perceptions of and Postoperative Satisfaction with Colorectal Robotic Surgery: A Qualitative Insight

Early Single-Center Experience of DaVinci® Single-Port (SP) Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Patients.

Background: DaVinci® single-port (SP) robotic surgery offers several benefits compared to traditional multiport laparoscopic or robotic surgeries. One of the main advantages is that it allows for a minimally invasive approach, resulting in a single, smaller incision and reduced trauma to the patient's body, leading to less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and reduced risk of complications. The cosmesis of a single port with minimal visible scarring is also an attractive aspect to the patients; however, many surgeons use an additional port for energy device, stapler use, and drain insertion. Pure single-port surgery with one incision is still rare. Here, we share our experience of our first 10 cases using the SP robotic platform in colorectal surgery. Methods: From May 2023 to December 2023, colorectal patients who underwent SP robotic surgery were analyzed. Placement of the incision was the umbilicus for eight patients, and right lower quadrant for two patients, through which ileostomy maturation was performed. Data on perioperative parameters and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 4.6 months (range 0.6-7.4 months). Results: A total of 10 colorectal patients underwent DaVinci® single-port robotic colorectal surgery at our institution during this period. The patient demographic was four males (40%) and six females (60%) with a median age of 63.5 years (range 50-75 years). Median body mass index (BMI) was 22.89 kg/m2 (range 19.92-26.84 kg/m2). Nine patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, and one patient was diagnosed with a rectal gastrointestinal tumor. One patient underwent anterior resection and cholecystectomy simultaneously. Mean operation time was 222 min (range 142-316 min), and mean wound size was 3.25 cm (range 2.5-4.5 cm). Nine patients underwent surgery with single incision through which a single-port trocar was inserted, and one patient had one additional port for drain insertion. Mean hospital stay was 6 days (range 4-8 days) with one postoperative complication of bleeding requiring transfusion, but there was no readmission within 30 days. Conclusions: Overall, our experience with single-port robotic colorectal surgery has been promising. With only one patient with additional port for drain insertion, all nine patients underwent SP-robotic surgery with single incision for colon as well as rectal surgeries. Compared to an average postoperative length of stay of 6.5-8 days in laparoscopic colorectal surgeries reported in literature, SP-robotic surgery 33showed faster recovery of 6 days highlighting its benefits in patient recovery and satisfaction.

Preceptorship in robotic colorectal surgery: experience from the Australian private sector

This article describes a post-fellowship preceptorship training program to train sub-specialty colorectal surgeons in gaining proficiency in robotic colorectal surgery using a dual-surgeon model in the Australian private sector. The Australian colorectal surgeon faces challenges in gaining robotic colorectal surgery proficiency with limited exposure and experience in the public setting where the majority of general and colorectal surgery training is currently conducted. This training model uses graded exposure with a range of simulation training, wet lab training, and clinical operative cases to progress through both competency and proficiency in robotic colorectal surgery which is mutually beneficial to surgeons and patients alike. Ongoing audit of practice has shown no adverse impacts.