Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy Research Articles

Editorial Comment on "Trends and Safety of Same-Day Discharge for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: a Comparison between the Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Periods from the National Cancer Database"

Editorial Comment on "Trends and Safety of Same-Day Discharge for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: a Comparison between the Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Periods from the National Cancer Database"

Current status analysis of the prevalence and regional disparities of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in Japan using diagnosis procedure combination data

The introduction of the “da Vinci S HD Surgical System” marked a significant shift towards robotic surgeries in Japan. However, initial high costs and lack of efficacy data posed barriers to its widespread adoption. By 2023, more than 570 da Vinci units were operational in Japan, highlighting the growing acceptance of robotic surgery despite these challenges. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and regional disparities in the adoption of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) across Japan using diagnosis procedure combination data. This retrospective observational study analyzed data from 2857 urban and 4184 regional hospitals across 47 prefectures in Japan. The study focused on the number of RALP procedures, da Vinci systems, and certified urological surgery proctors. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify significant factors influencing RALP adoption. Urban areas demonstrated a higher prevalence of RALP procedures and more da Vinci systems compared to regional areas, with urban hospitals performing an average of 937 RALP procedures compared to 195.5 in regional hospitals. The number of certified urological surgeons also showed significant urban-regional disparities, contributing to the overall imbalance. Our findings highlight substantial regional disparities in access to robot-assisted surgery in Japan, with urban areas benefiting from better access to advanced medical technologies and specialist training. Addressing these disparities will require targeted policies to improve the dissemination of robotic surgery systems and enhance training opportunities in regional cities.

Modified robotic simple prostatectomy technique: a retrospective analysis of a series of 162 surgeries performed by a high-volume surgeon.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) affects up to 80% of men by age 80, with large-gland BPH often treated by simple prostatectomy (SP). This technique significantly improves symptoms but is associated with high rates of complications such as transfusions and infections. Minimally invasive techniques, including robotic-assisted laparoscopic simple suprapubic prostatectomy (RALSP), have emerged as alternatives. This study reports on 162 patients who underwent RALSP from May 2018 to June 2023. The mean age of the patients was 69years, mean prostate volume 144.8cm3, mean robot time 78.7min, and mean blood loss 183.1mL. Results demonstrated significant improvements in the results: prostate volume (mean decrease from 144.8 to 26.6cm3), mean PSA level decreased from 7.8 to 0.8 (p < 0.0001), mean IPSS decreased from 23.0 to 4.4 (p < 0.0001), and mean uroflowmetry increased from 6.3 to 22.6ml/s (p < 0.0001). No patient experienced worsening erectile function after surgery. All patients showed absence of stress urinary incontinence within 3months. Catheterization time decreased from 4.2 to 2.6days over the study period. The postoperative complication rate was 2.29%, with no need for surgical reintervention for complications. While RALSP showed promising results, further prospective studies are needed to compare it with other techniques. This study highlights RALSP as a viable minimally invasive option for treating large-volume BPH, offering reduced recovery times and fewer complications.

Trends and Safety of Same-day Discharge for Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Comparison Between the Pre-pandemic and Pandemic Periods From the National Cancer Database

ObjectiveTo assess and compare the use of same-day discharge (SDD) for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) between the "Pre-pandemic" and "Pandemic" periods and investigate SDD impact on mortality and readmissions. Materials and MethodsWe examined data from the National Cancer Database on men receiving RALP in the “Pre-pandemic” (2018-2019) and “Pandemic” (2020) periods. We analyzed the differences in patient and hospital characteristics between SDD and non-SDD patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the likelihood of SDD during "Pandemic" versus "Pre-pandemic" periods. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was utilized to assess the impact of SDD on 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and 30-day readmissions, adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. ResultsOut of 111,117 men, 8,997 (8%) received SDD. Patients with more comorbidities, non-private insurance, and high-risk prostate cancer reported lower SDD rates (p<0.001). Higher SDD rates were observed at academic facilities and those in the top RALP volume quartile (p<0.001). Patients who underwent RALP during the "Pandemic" period had increased odds of SDD compared to those receiving RALP in the "Pre-pandemic" period (aOR 1.37; 95%CI 1.31-1.45; p<0.001). When comparing SDD and non-SDD patient outcomes, after IPTW adjustment, there was no difference in the odds of 30-day mortality (aOR 0.98; 95%CI 0.47-2.01; p=0.95), 90-day mortality (aOR 1.09; 95%CI 0.60-1.97; p=0.76), or 30-day readmissions (aOR 0.90; 95%CI 0.76-1.06, p=0.21). ConclusionSDD for RALP increased steadily after pandemic. Identifying factors and necessary resources to standardize SDD for RALP will be crucial for its widespread adoption in the coming years.

Gender Differences in the Adoption and Utilization of Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Among Practicing Urologists: A Study of American Board of Urology Case Logs From 2012-2022

ObjectiveTo evaluate the differential activity in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) by urologic surgeon gender. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of American Board of Urology surgical case logs from 2012-2022. The CPT-coded laparoscopic procedures included were: Partial Nephrectomy (50543), Radical Nephrectomy (50545, 50546, 50548), Pyeloplasty (50544), and Sacrocolpopexy (57425). Robotic-assisted cases were co-coded with CPT S2900. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression analyzed the roles of physician gender and other factors on RALS utilization. A separate analysis was performed for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy (RALP) (55866). ResultsWomen performed 10.8% of all procedures and 9.02% of robotic cases. General Urology and Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) had higher concentrations of women. Of the CPT procedures analyzed, women performed the highest percentage of sacrocolpopexies (39.2% of total), 8.09% of which were robotic. In multivariate regression, women surgeons had significantly lower odds of performing a robotic case compared to men (OR 0.803, p<0.001). Endourology, Oncology, Pediatric Urology, and URPS subspecialties were associated with RALS. Upward trends were depicted across all physicians (0.012, [0.007, 0.018], p<0.001) and for men (0.019, [0.010, 0.029], p=0.001). Women showed no significant increase in robotic usage over time (p=0.463). ConclusionsWomen have lower odds of participating in robotics, primarily specialize in URPS and their involvement in RALS is skewed toward sacrocolpopexy. As robotics continues to dominate surgical urology, ensuring equitable training opportunities is essential. Research into the roles of mentorship in residency, same gender patient-physician concordance, practice setting, and recent graduates’ referral patterns is warranted.

Elevating precision: A thorough investigation of multiparametric prostate MRI for prolonged insights into early continence prediction after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

BackgroundWhile radical prostatectomy stands out as one of the most effective curative treatments for prostate cancer, it does come with annoying side effects, such as urinary incontinence (UI). We aimed to investigate the predictability of UI using MRI measurements, along with clinical and disease-related variables. MethodsWe included 191 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy between July 2020 and October 2022 in the study. Preoperative MRIs of the patients are re-evaluated by an experienced uroradiologist, and membranous urethral length (MUL), urethra wall thickness, levator ani thickness, outer levator distance, Lee's apex shape, intravesical prostate protrusion length, prostate apex depth, and pubic height measurements were made. Additionally, retrospective data on patients' age, BMI, PSA, PSA density, prostate volume, IPSS, clinical stage, and nerve-sparing status were collected. Patients were categorized into two groups based on continence status in the third postoperative month: continent or incontinent. The definition of UI was accepted as the use of one or more pads per day. ResultsUI was observed in 38.21 % of the patients in the postoperative third month. Among MRI measurements, only MUL showed a significant relationship with UI (p < 0.001). IPSS (p = 0.004) and Clinical Stage (p < 0.001) were also significantly associated with continence status. Logistic regression analysis identified BMI (p = 0.023; CI 0.73–0.97), IPSS (p = 0.002; CI 1.03–1.17), MUL (p = 0.001; CI 0.66–0.90), and Clinical Stage (p < 0.001; CI 1.53–2.71) as significant predictors. In Multivariable Regression analysis, Clinical Stage emerged as the most powerful predictor of UI (p < 0.001). ConclusionsExcept for MUL, MRI measurements may not predict postoperative UI. A combination of IPSS, clinical stage, and MUL effectively informs patients about postoperative outcomes. These findings contribute to enhancing preoperative counseling for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Clinical efficacy of a rehabilitation management protocol for urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the application of a rehabilitation management protocol for urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 114 patients who underwent RALP between August 2021 and November 2021 as the control group and a prospective analysis of 114 patients who underwent RALP between May 2022 and August 2022 as the experimental group. The rehabilitation management protocol focused on preoperative stage, postoperative care, day of catheter removal, 1 month postoperative, 3 months postoperative, 6 months postoperative, and 12 months or more postoperative.ResultsThe 24-h pad test was significantly lower in the experimental group compared with the control group at 2 and 6 months after RALP (both P < 0.01). The scores of the international consultation on incontinence questionnaire-short form (ICIQ-SF) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 1 month after RALP (P < 0.01).The scores of quality of life in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group at 1, 2, and 6 months after RALP (all P < 0.01).The scores of Broome Pelvic Muscle Self-efficacy Scale (BPMSES) were lower than those of the control group at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months after RALP (all P < 0.01).ConclusionThe application of the rehabilitation management protocol had significant beneficial effects on urinary functions and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer after RALP.

Comparing the diagnostic value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT and multiparametric MRI in pelvic lymph node metastasis of locally advanced prostate cancer.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a commonly used method to diagnose pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, but there are few comparative studies on mpMRI and 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in locally advanced PCa (LAPC) patients. Therefore, we designed a retrospective study to compare the diagnostic value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for PLNM of LAPC. A retrospective study was performed on 50 patients with LAPC who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in Tongji Hospital from 2021 to 2023. All patients underwent PET/CT and mpMRI examination, and were diagnosed as LAPC before surgery, followed by robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy or laparoscopic RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). Routine postoperative pathological examination was performed. According to the results, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for the diagnosis of PLNM of LAPC were compared. Among the 50 patients, the mean age was 65.5±10.3 years, the preoperative total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 30.7±12.3 ng/mL, and the Gleason score was 7 [7, 8]. The difference in diagnostic efficacy between 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in the preoperative diagnosis of PLNM of PCa was determined by postoperative pathological results. Based on the number of patients who developed PLNM, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were as follows: 93.75%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 97.14%, and 68.75%, 97.06%, 91.67%, 86.84% for mpMRI, respectively. Based on the number of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 95.24%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 99.48%, and 65.08%, 99.13%, 89.13%, 96.30% for mpMRI, respectively. It turned out that PET/CT was more sensitive than mpMRI in detecting PLNM of PCa, and the difference was statistically significant. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is more sensitive than mpMRI in the detection of PLNM in patients with LAPC. It is a promising method in the diagnosis and preoperative assessment of PLNM in LAPC.

Comparative assessment of safety and efficacy between the AirSeal system and conventional insufflation system in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to compare perioperative outcome measures between the AirSeal system and conventional insufflation system in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Up to May 2024, comprehensive searches were conducted across various prominent databases worldwide, such as PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar, focusing solely on English-language materials. Reviews and protocols devoid of published data were excluded, along with conference abstracts and articles unrelated to the study's aims. Primary outcome measures encompassed operative duration and hospitalization length, while secondary outcome measures included estimated blood loss and complications. The meta-analysis included five cohort studies, encompassing a total of 1503 patients. In comparison to the conventional insufflation system group, the AirSeal group displayed shorter operative times (WMD -15.62, 95% CI -21.87 to -9.37; p < 0.00001) and reduced hospital stays (WMD -0.45, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.30; p < 0.00001). Fewer major complications (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.66; p = 0.01). Notably, there were no significant differences observed in estimated blood loss or overall complications between the two groups. Compared to conventional insufflation systems, employing the AirSeal system in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy appears to potentially decrease operative time and hospital length of stay without a concurrent rise in estimated blood loss or complication rates.

Impact of frozen section on long-term outcomes in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

To compare 1-year functional and 5-year oncological outcomes of men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) with those in men undergoing RALP without NeuroSAFE (standard of care [SOC]). Men undergoing RALP in our centre between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2018 were enrolled from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were excluded if they had undergone preoperative therapy or postoperative adjuvant therapy or were enrolled in clinical trials. Patients were grouped based on use of NeuroSAFE. Follow-up was censored at 5 years. The primary outcome was difference in time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) on multivariable analysis, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/L on two consecutive measurements. Secondary outcomes were difference in 1-year erectile dysfunction and incontinence. In the enrolment period, 1199 consecutive men underwent RALP, of whom 1140 were eligible, including 317 with NeuroSAFE and 823 with SOC. The median PSA follow-up was 60 months in both groups. Rates of 5-year BCR were similar on Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (11% vs 11%; P = 0.9), as was time to BCR on multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling (hazard ratio 1.2; P = 0.6). Compared with the SOC group at 1 year, the NeuroSAFE group had similar unadjusted rates of incontinence (5.1% vs 7.7%) and lower unadjusted impotence (57% vs 80%). On multivariable analysis, NeuroSAFE patients had equivalent risk of incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.17-1.6; P = 0.4) but significantly reduced risk of erectile dysfunction (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.60; P < 0.001). For men undergoing RALP, compared with SOC, NeuroSAFE patients had equivalent time to BCR and risk of 1-year incontinence, and significantly lower risk of 1-year erectile dysfunction.

Association of Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills and Outcomes of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy

ObjectiveTo investigate if use of the Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills (CSATSTM) platform and video peer review with constructive feedback is associated with improvement in technical skill and patient outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). MethodsFive fellowship-trained urologists voluntarily submitted RALP cases for CSATSTM Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) scoring and expert narrative review between April 15, 2022 - April 30, 2023. Surgeon-selected and randomly-selected cases were reviewed. Surgeons underwent local peer review of videos with constructive feedback. Change in GEARS scores and frequency of post-operative outcomes over the 12-month periods before and during the study were analyzed in logistic regression models. Bias was assessed with sensitivity analysis comparing surgeon-selected to randomly-selected cases. ResultsGEARS scores for randomly-selected versus surgeon-selected cases did not differ significantly. Overall GEARS score correlated positively with annual surgical RALP volume (r=0.39, p=0.003) and negatively with years in practice (r=-0.34, p=0.01). After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant improvement in overall GEARS Score (0.01±0.02/month, p=0.48); but likelihood of sepsis (Odds Ratio 0.07, 95% CI 0.01-1.00, p=0.05) and pelvic fluid collection (Odds Ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.99, p=0.049) were significantly decreased during the intervention period (n=165) compared to the prior 12 months (n=144). No outcome increased in likelihood (p>0.05). ConclusionsIntegration of CSATSTM and local video peer review is associated with significant improvement in patient outcomes after RALP, despite no significant change in surgeons’ GEARS scores. This is the first study demonstrating improvement in patient RALP outcomes after implementation of such a paradigm in practicing surgeons.

Mechanical power during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: an observational study

BackgroundRobotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) requires pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg position. Our aim was to investigate the influence of the combination of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position on mechanical power and its components during RALP.MethodsSixty-one prospectively enrolled patients scheduled for RALP were studied in supine position before surgery, during pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery at constant ventilatory setting. In a subgroup of 17 patients the response to increasing positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) from 5 to 10 cmH2O was studied.ResultsThe application of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position increased the total mechanical power (13.8 [11.6 – 15.5] vs 9.2 [7.5 – 11.7] J/min, p < 0.001) and its elastic and resistive components compared to supine position before surgery. In supine position after surgery the total mechanical power and its elastic component decreased but remained higher compared to supine position before surgery. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 cmH2O within each timepoint significantly increased the total mechanical power (supine position before surgery: 9.8 [8.4 – 10.4] vs 12.1 [11.4 – 14.2] J/min, p < 0.001; pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position: 13.8 [12.2 – 14.3] vs 15.5 [15.0 – 16.7] J/min, p < 0.001; supine position after surgery: 10.2 [9.4 – 10.7] vs 12.7 [12.0 – 13.6] J/min, p < 0.001), without affecting respiratory system elastance.ConclusionMechanical power in healthy patients undergoing RALP significantly increased both during the pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position and in supine position after surgery. PEEP always increased mechanical power without ameliorating the respiratory system elastance.

Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis of the perioperative outcomes associated with robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) versus open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in the obese population diagnosed with prostate cancer. We performed a comprehensive search in key databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, encompassing studies of all languages, with a final search date of April 2024. We also omitted articles that consisted of conference abstracts and content that was not pertinent to our study. The aggregated outcomes were evaluated utilizing the metrics of weighted mean differences (WMDs) and odds ratios (ORs). A sensitivity analysis was also integrated into our assessment. The meta-analysis was facilitated by employing Stata/MP version 18 software. Additionally, the study was duly registered with PROSPERO under the identifier: CRD 42024540216. This meta-analysis, which included five trials, shows that compared to ORP, RARP is associated with a reduced estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD -445.77, 95%CI -866.08, -25.45; p = 0.038), a decreased transfusion rate (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.13, 0.21; p < 0.001), and a diminished overall complication rate (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.58, 0.86; p = 0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in operative time (OT) (WMD 1.88, 95%CI -46.53, 50.28; p = 0.939) or length of stay (LOS) (WMD -0.41, 95%CI -1.07, 0.25; p = 0.221). Among patients with obesity and prostate cancer, RARP demonstrates advantages over ORP by reducing estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, and the incidence of complications. Notably, there were no significant differences in operative duration and hospital stay between the two surgical approaches. These findings suggest that RARP could be a preferable surgical option for obese individuals with prostate cancer.

Postoperative pain, recovery and discharge after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A multicentre, single blinded, randomised controlled trial.

General anaesthesia is standard of care for patients undergoing robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). However, postoperative pain and bladder discomfort remains an issue, and optimising pain management could improve recovery and promote earlier home discharge. The main objective of this trial was to evaluate if patients receiving spinal anaesthesia are more frequently home ready at 8 pm on the same day compared with multimodal pain management following RALP under general anaesthesia. This pragmatic, randomised controlled, multicentre trial was performed between January 2019 to December 2021. Patients undergoing RALP under general anaesthesia were randomised to either multimodal analgesia using parecoxib and morphine intra-operatively (Group GM) or spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine and sufentanil (Group GS). The primary aim, home readiness, was assessed using a post-anaesthesia discharge scoring system. Of 202 patients analysed, 27% patients reached home readiness criteria after 12 h, 46% after 24 h and 79% after 48 h, without differences between the groups. Urge to pass urine was greater in group GM than in group GS (p ⟨0.001) and lasted for a median of two hours in both groups. More patients expressed satisfaction with postoperative care in group GS (p ⟨0.001). No other significant differences were found between the groups. We found no difference in time to home readiness between the groups. Approximately one-fourth of the patients achieved home readiness the same day after surgery without difference between the groups. Fewer patients had urge, and patient satisfaction was greater in group GS.

Comparison of In-person Versus Online Comprehensive Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation Program Following Prostatectomy

ObjectiveTo compare continence outcomes in post-prostatectomy patients undergoing supervised in-person versus online pelvic floor muscle training and pelvic floor education (iPMFT versus oPFMT/PFE). Despite the proven benefit of in-person PFMT for urinary incontinence (UI) following prostatectomy, numerous barriers impede access. We developed a comprehensive online program to deliver oPFMT/PFE. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of patients receiving iPFMT versus oPFMT/PFE with minimum 12-month follow-up. Outcomes were assessed at 3-weeks, 3-, 6-, and 12-months following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy using validated ICIQ-MLUTS and IIQ-7 questionnaires and additional items (daily pad use (PPD) and satisfaction). The primary study outcome was ICIQ-MLUTS SUI domain score (SDS). Secondary outcomes were PPD, PPD cure (0 PPD at 12-months), SUI cure (12-month SDS = baseline score), and QOL score (IIQ-7 Sum). ResultsAnalysis included 41 men. Though men enrolled in oPFMT/PFE demonstrated lower SUI domain scores than iPFMT at most time points (3w p<0.01, 3m p=0.04, 6m p=0.15, 12m p=0.04), the rate of improvement from 3-weeks to other time points was similar between groups (p=NS at all time points)). SDS Cure was no different for oPFMT/PFE (75%, 15/20) compared to iPFMT (60%, 12/20, p=0.3). PPD and IIQ-7 were also similar at all time points and demonstrated a similar rate of decrease over time through 12 months. ConclusionsSignificant and similar improvements in UI and QOL are seen both in men completing iPFMT or oPFMT/PFE programs. Our novel online program provides another option to improve PFMT/PFE access in men undergoing RALP.

Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy and Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Limited high-quality studies have compared robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy. We sought to compare their postoperative outcomes in a randomized setting. In a single center, 354 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were assessed for eligibility; 342 were randomized (1:1). The primary outcome was 90-day complication rates. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed over 18 months, and oncological outcomes, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and additional treatment over 36 months. From 2014 to 18, 327 patients underwent surgery (retropubic radical prostatectomy = 156, RALP = 171). Complications occurred in 27 (17.3%) vs 19 (11.1%; P = .107). Patients undergoing RALP experienced lower median bleeding (250.0 vs 719.5 mL; P < .001) and shorter hospitalization time. Urinary EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) median scores were better for RALP over 18 months, with higher continence rate at 3 months (80.5% vs 64.7%; P = .002), 6 months (90.1% vs 81.6%; P = .036) and 18 months (95.4% vs 78.8%; P < .001). Sexual EPIC and Sexual Health Inventory for Men median scores were higher with RALP up to 12 months, while the potency rate was superior at 3 months (23.9% vs 5.3%; P = .001) and 6 months (30.6% vs 6.9%; P < .001). Quality of life over the 18 months and oncological outcomes over 36 months were not significantly different between arms. Complications at 90 days were similar. RALP showed superior sexual outcomes at 1 year, improved urinary outcomes at 18 months, and comparable oncological outcomes at 36 months. Prospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery; NCT02292914. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914?cond=NCT02292914&draw=2&rank=1.

The Association between Urine N-Glycome and Prognosis after Initial Therapy for Primary Prostate Cancer.

Next to prostate-specific antigen, no biochemical biomarkers have been implemented to guide patient follow-up after primary therapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa). We evaluated the prognostic potential of urine N-glycome in terms of event-free survival (EFS) in patients undergoing primary therapy for PCa. The prognostic features of the urine N-glycosylation profile at diagnosis, assessed in 77 PCa patients, were determined in terms of EFS next to standard clinical parameters. The majority of patients were diagnosed with International Society of Urological Pathology grade ≤ 3 (82%) T1-2 tumors (79%) and without pelvic lymph node invasion (96%). The patients underwent active surveillance (14%), robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (48%), or external beam radiotherapy (37%). Decreased ratios of biantennary core-fucosylation were noted in patients who developed an event, which was linked to a shorter EFS in both the intention-to-treat cohort and all subcohort analyses. Combining the urine N-glycan biomarker with the D'Amico Risk Classification for PCa resulted in an improved nomogram for patient classification after primary therapy. The rate of urine N-glycan biantennary core-fucosylation, typically linked to more aggressive disease status, is lower in patients who eventually developed an event following primary therapy and subsequently in patients with a worse EFS. The combination of urine N-glycan biomarkers together with clinical parameters could, therefore, improve the post-therapy follow-up of patients with PCa.

COMPARISON OF ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY VS LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY ON PROSTATE CANCER PATIENT: A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background: Prostate cancer constitutes 3.8 of all cancer-related deaths in men. Radical prostatectomy stands as a standard surgical treatment for prostate cancer. Robot-assisted systems have emerged aiming to simplify the intricacies of complex laparoscopic procedures. Specifically, robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) has been proposed as a means to expedite the learning curve, potentially leading to quicker reductions in operative time compared to traditional laparoscopic techniques (LRP). This study aims to serve a comprehensive systematic review to compare laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) and robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) on prostate cancer based on literatures of the last 10 years. Methods: The review adhered to PRISMA 2020 standards and analyzed full-text English literature from 2014 to 2024. It excluded editorials, review papers from the same journal, and submissions lacking a DOI. Literature sources included PubMed, SagePub, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Result: A total of 655 articles were retrieved from online databases (PubMed, SagePub, SpringerLink and Google Scholar). After three rounds of screening, five articles directly relevant to the systematic review were selected for full-text reading and analysis. Conclusion: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) offers advantages such as quicker recovery and comparable safety to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Studies show better urinary continence and potency outcomes with RARP. While PSM rates vary between RARP and LRP, further research is needed to understand their impact on recurrence. Despite challenges like the lack of tactile sensation in RARP, it remains a popular choice for prostate cancer treatment.

Safety and complications of continuation of aspirin therapy in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic simple prostatectomy

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of continued perioperative aspirin at the time of robotic assisted simple prostatectomy (RASP). We performed a retrospective review of our IRB approved institutional database of patients who underwent RASP between 2013 and 2022. Comparative groups included patients taking aspirin in the perioperative period and those not taking aspirin pre-operatively. The primary outcome was any post-operative bleeding related complication using the modified Clavien–Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included the identification of risk factors for increased blood loss in the entire study population, operative time, and blood transfusion requirement. 143 patients underwent RASP of which 55 (38.5%) patients continued perioperative aspirin therapy and 88 (61.5%) patients did not. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Patients taking perioperative aspirin had a higher rate of hypertension (74.5% vs 58.0%, p = 0.04) and other cardiovascular disease (30.9% vs 11.4%, p = 0.007). Postoperative complications were similar between the groups (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3; p = 0.43). Median blood loss (150 cc vs 150 cc, p = 0.38), percentage drop in hemoglobin (13.4 vs 13.2, p = 0.94) and blood transfusion rate (3.6 vs 1.1, p = 0.56) were also similar between groups. The median blood loss was 150 ml for the whole study population. On regression analysis, neither aspirin nor any other variable was associated with increased blood loss (> 150 ml). Aspirin can be safely continued perioperatively in patients undergoing RASP without any risk of bleeding related complications, blood loss, or increased transfusion rate.

Acute kidney injury after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A meta-analysis.

We investigated the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) post robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP). A comprehensive search was conducted to identify studies that reported the rates of AKI post-RALP. A random effects model was used, and the pooled rates of AKI were calculated. We identified 10 studies with 60,937 patients to be included. The mean age was 65.1years. The mean anaesthesia time was 234.3min (95% CI: 177.8-290.9). The mean operation time was 212.2min (95% CI: 188.7-235.6). The mean estimated blood loss was 314.1mL (95% CI: 153-475.3). The mean intraoperative IV fluids administered were 1985mL (95% CI: 1516.3-2453.7). The pooled rate of AKI post RALP was 7.2% (95% CI 19-23.9). The rates of AKI after RALP are significant. Further studies are needed to detect the risk factors for AKI and to determine the rates of chronic kidney disease post-RALP.