Fragility analysis is a well-known tool to evaluate the impact of different retrofit measures on damage probability of structures. In this study, the performances of a conventional multi-span continuous (MSC) concrete girder bridge reinforced with different seismic control devices were investigated. The original bridge is supported by both elastomeric bearings and exterior shear keys. For other retrofitting solutions, lead rubber bearings (LRB), friction pendulum systems (FPS), and buckling-restrained braces (BRB) were considered and compared to the original structure of the bridge in terms of seismic performances and economical costs. To analyze the seismic performances, the fragility curves based on the probabilistic seismic demand model were extracted under various near-field and far-field ground motions. Additionally, cost-benefit analyses were performed to determine the benefit of using each of the devices economically. The results indicated that both LRB and FPS significantly reduced the damage probability of substructure, while FPS provided the bridge with high vulnerability in abutment seat at slight and moderate levels of damage. Also, the installation of BRB seismically was an efficient solution and decreased the damage probability of the bridge system. Based on the results of fragility and cost-benefit analysis, LRB was found to be a beneficial implement for the studied bridge.
Read full abstract