Residual Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk Research Articles

Abstract 4134911: Coronary Artery Calcium Predicts Cardiovascular Events in Individuals with Controlled Atherosclerotic Risk Factors: A Multi-Cohort Study

Background: There is residual risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) that remains despite adequate risk factor (RF) control. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) has demonstrated value in ASCVD risk stratification. We evaluated the value of CAC in identifying residual risk of ASCVD events among those with traditional RF control. Methods: Participants without clinical ASCVD were pooled from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study, Framingham Heart Study, and Jackson Heart Study. RF control was classified as “guideline-concordant” and “optimal” (Figure 1). Participants were stratified by the number of controlled RFs at baseline and CAC score (CAC = 0, 1-99, ≥100). Cox proportional hazards models examined the association between CAC and incident ASCVD events. Results: The study included 14,780 individuals (mean age 58 years (SD: 11), 54% female, 59% White, 27% Black, 50% CAC = 0). Over a median follow-up of 14.6 years, there were 1,441 incident ASCVD events. The distribution of CAC and ASCVD event incidence is shown in Panel A; 10% of those with 3 optimal RFs and 19% of those with 3 guideline-concordant RFs controlled had CAC > 100. The rate of ASCVD events decreased with more RFs controlled and increased with higher CAC. Overall, optimal RF control was associated with lower ASCVD event rates compared to guideline-concordant control. At every level of RF control, CAC > 100 was associated with increased HRs for incident ASCVD (Panel B). Those with CAC ≥ 100 and controlled RFs experienced ASCVD rates numerically comparable to or exceeding those with uncontrolled RFs but CAC = 0 (Panel A). Adjusted HR (95% CI) for ASCVD events with CAC > 100 compared to CAC = 0 was 5.0 (2.0, 12.9) in optimal RF control and 3.7 (2.6, 5.4) in guideline-concordant RF control. Conclusion: There is significant heterogeneity in residual ASCVD risk among those with optimal or guideline-concordant traditional RF control and CAC can help identify this risk. Irrespective of RF control, a higher CAC burden was associated with increased ASCVD risk. Future studies could use CAC testing to identify those with higher residual ASCVD risk despite effective traditional RF control to target for novel therapies.

Lipoprotein(a) levels and cholesterol efflux capacity: inverse association and impact on atherosclerosis in familial hypercholesterolemia patients on lipid-lowering therapy

Abstract Backgrounds Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients have higher serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels than non-FH patients, and high Lp(a) levels raise atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk 1). We previously reported that decreased cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is a risk marker for ASCVD in patients with statin-treated FH 2). Others have reported that Lp(a) interferes with the enhancement of ABCA1-mediated cholesterol efflux by plasminogen and that ABCA1-mediated CEC is lower in patients with Lp(a) >50 mg/dL. However, the association of CEC, not necessarily ABCA1-mediated, with Lp(a) is not clear and has not been studied in patients with FH. It is also unclear whether high Lp(a) and low CEC in patients with FH are associated with the severity of atherosclerosis. Purpose We examined whether Lp(a) levels are negatively associated with ABCA1-independent CEC in patients with FH receiving lipid-lowering therapy. We also examined the impact of the combination of high Lp(a) and low CEC on the presence of corneal arcus, Achilles tendon thickness, carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), and pre-existing ASCVD. Methods This cross-sectional study included 371 patients clinically diagnosed with FH receiving lipid-lowering therapy. CEC was measured in apolipoprotein B-depleted plasma and 3H-cholesterol-labeled J774.1 cells without cAMP-stimulated ABCA1 overexpression. Lp(a) was measured by enzymatic methods (Sekisui Medical, Tokyo, Japan) using an automated analyser. Achilles tendon thickness was measured by X-ray and carotid IMT by ultrasound. Results Mean age was 55±16 years, and 191 (51%) were women. The median serum Lp(a) level was 18.7 mg/dL, higher than the previously reported median level (13 mg/dL) in a Japanese population. One hundred nineteen patients (32%) had serum Lp(a) levels of 30 mg/dL or higher, and they had significantly lower CEC (P=0.0015). This negative association persisted after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking status, serum LDL-cholesterol, serum triglycerides, and eGFR in a multiple linear regression model (beta-coefficient: -0.047, 95% CI: -0.075 - -0.019, P=0.0011). In addition, patients with both Lp(a) > 30 mg/dL and CEC lower than the median had a higher percentage of corneal arcus, thicker Achilles tendons, greater carotid IMT, and a higher prevalence of pre-existing ASCVD compared to patients with either or neither. Conclusions We found an inverse relationship between Lp(a) levels and CEC in FH patients receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Our results suggest that Lp(a) may also inhibit ABCA1-independent CEC, including passive cholesterol diffusion from peripheral cells. Furthermore, the combination of high Lp(a) and low CEC may be a residual risk for patients with FH receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Future studies are needed to determine whether agents that decrease Lp(a) levels will increase CEC and thereby resolve part of the residual ASCVD risk in FH.

Impact of Remnant Cholesterol on Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes.

Individuals with diabetes face increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), in part due to hyperlipidemia. Even after LDL cholesterol-lowering, residual ASCVD risk persists, part of which may be attributed to elevated remnant cholesterol. We describe the impact of elevated remnant cholesterol on ASCVD risk in diabetes. Preclinical, observational, and Mendelian randomization studies robustly suggest that elevated remnant cholesterol causally increases risk of ASCVD, suggesting remnant cholesterol could be a treatment target. However, the results of recent clinical trials of omega-3 fatty acids and fibrates, which lower levels of remnant cholesterol in individuals with diabetes, are conflicting in terms of ASCVD prevention. This is likely partly due to neutral effects of these drugs on the total level of apolipoprotein B(apoB)-containing lipoproteins. Elevated remnant cholesterol remains a likely cause of ASCVD in diabetes. Remnant cholesterol-lowering therapies should also lower apoB levels to reduce risk of ASCVD.

Does Adopting Western Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets Expose Indians to a Higher Risk of Cardiovascular Events? Expert Opinion From the Lipid Association of India.

Adverse cardiovascular (CV) events have declined in Western countries due at least in part to aggressive risk factor control, including dyslipidemia management. The American and European (Western) dyslipidemia treatment guidelines have contributed significantly to the reduction in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) incidence in the respective populations. However, their direct extrapolation to Indian patients does not seem appropriate for the reasons described below. In the US, mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have markedly declined over the last 2 decades, correlating with a proportional reduction in CV events. Conversely, poor risk factor control and dyslipidemia management have led to increased CV and coronary artery disease (CAD) mortality rates in India. The population-attributable risk of dyslipidemia is about 50% for myocardial infarction, signifying its major role in CV events. In addition, the pattern of dyslipidemia in Indians differs considerably from that in Western populations, requiring unique strategies for lipid management in Indians and modified treatment targets. The Lipid Association of India (LAI) recognized the need for tailored LDL-C targets for Indians and recommended lower targets compared to Western guidelines. For individuals with established ASCVD or diabetes with additional risk factors, an LDL-C target of <50 mg/dL was recommended, with an optional target of ≤30 mg/dL for individuals at extremely high risk. There are several reasons that necessitate these lower targets. In Indian subjects, CAD develops 10 years earlier than in Western populations and is more malignant. Additionally, Indians experience higher CAD mortality despite having lower basal LDL-C levels, requiring greater LDL-C reduction to achieve a comparable CV event reduction. The Indian Council for Medical Research-India Diabetes study described a high prevalence of dyslipidemia among Indians, characterized by relatively lower LDL-C levels, higher triglyceride levels, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels compared to Western populations. About 30% of Indians have hypertriglyceridemia, aggravating ASCVD risk and complicating dyslipidemia management. The levels of atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including remnant lipoproteins, are increased in hypertriglyceridemia and are predictive of CV events. Hypertriglyceridemia is also associated with higher levels of small, dense LDL particles, which are more atherogenic, and higher levels of apolipoprotein B (Apo B), reflecting a higher burden of circulating atherogenic lipoprotein particles. A high prevalence of low HDL-C, which is often dysfunctional, and elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels further contribute to the heightened atherogenicity and premature CAD in Indians. Considering the unique characteristics of atherogenic dyslipidemia in Indians, lower LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and Apo B goals compared to Western guidelines are required for effective control of ASCVD risk in Indians. South Asian ancestry is identified as a risk enhancer in the American lipid management guidelines, highlighting the elevated ASCVD risk of Indian and other South Asian individuals, suggesting a need for more aggressive LDL-C lowering in such individuals. Hence, the LDL-C goals recommended by the Western guidelines may be excessively high for Indians and could result in significant residual ASCVD risk attributable to inadequate LDL-C lowering. Further, the results of Mendelian randomization studies have shown that lowering LDL-C by 5-10 mg/dL reduces CV risk by 8-18%. The lower LDL-C targets proposed by LAI can yield these incremental benefits. In conclusion, Western LDL-C targets may not be suitable for Indian subjects, given the earlier presentation of ASCVD at lower LDL-C levels. They may result in greater CV events that could otherwise be prevented with lower LDL-C targets. The atherogenic dyslipidemia in Indian individuals necessitates more aggressive LDL-C and non-HDL-C lowering, as recommended by the LAI, in order to stem the epidemic of ASCVD in India.

Recent Advances in Targeted Management of Inflammation In Atherosclerosis: A Narrative Review.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality despite effective low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-targeted therapies. This review explores the crucial role of inflammation in the residual risk of ASCVD, emphasizing its impact on atherosclerosis progression and plaque stability. Evidence suggests that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), and potentially other inflammatory biomarkers, can be used to identify the inflammatory residual ASCVD risk phenotype and may serve as future targets for the development of more efficacious therapeutic approaches. We review the biological basis for the association of inflammation with ASCVD, propose new therapeutic strategies for the use of inflammation-targeted treatments, and discuss current challenges in the implementation of this new treatment paradigm for ASCVD.

Beyond LDL-C: unravelling the residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk landscape-focus on hypertriglyceridaemia.

Historically, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk profile mitigation has had a predominant focus on low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In this narrative review we explore the residual ASCVD risk profile beyond LDL-C with a focus on hypertriglyceridaemia, recent clinical trials of therapeutics targeting hypertriglyceridaemia and novel modalities addressing other residual ASCVD risk factors. Hypertriglyceridaemia remains a significant ASCVD risk despite low LDL-C in statin or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor-treated patients. Large population-based observational studies have consistently demonstrated an association between hypertriglyceridaemia with ASCVD. This relationship is complicated by the co-existence of low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Despite significantly improving atherogenic dyslipidaemia, the most recent clinical trial outcome has cast doubt on the utility of pharmacologically lowering triglyceride concentrations using fibrates. On the other hand, purified eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), but not in combination with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), has produced favourable ASCVD outcomes. The outcome of these trials suggests alternate pathways involved in ASCVD risk modulation. Several other pharmacotherapies have been proposed to address other ASCVD risk factors targeting inflammation, thrombotic and metabolic factors. Hypertriglyceridaemia poses a significant residual ASCVD risk in patients already on LDL-C lowering therapy. Results from pharmacologically lowering triglyceride are conflicting. The role of fibrates and combination of EPA and DHA is under question but there is now convincing evidence of ASCVD risk reduction with pure EPA in a subgroup of patients with hypertriglyceridaemia. Clinical guidelines should be updated in line with recent clinical trials evidence. Novel agents targeting non-conventional ASCVD risks need further evaluation.

Discordance Between Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Increases Cardiovascular Disease Risk in a Geographically Defined Cohort.

Clinical risk scores are used to identify those at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Despite preventative efforts, residual risk remains for many individuals. Very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and lipid discordance could be contributors to the residual risk of ASCVD. Cardiovascular disease-free residents, aged ≥40 years, living in Olmsted County, Minnesota, were identified through the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and VLDL-C were estimated from clinically ordered lipid panels using the Sampson equation. Participants were categorized into concordant and discordant lipid pairings based on clinical cut points. Rates of incident ASCVD, including percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, or myocardial infarction, were calculated during follow-up. The association of LDL-C and VLDL-C with ASCVD was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Interaction between LDL-C and VLDL-C was assessed. The study population (n=39 098) was primarily White race (94%) and female sex (57%), with a mean age of 54 years. VLDL-C (per 10-mg/dL increase) was significantly associated with an increased risk of incident ASCVD (hazard ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.05-1.09]; P<0.001]) after adjustment for traditional risk factors. The interaction between LDL-C and VLDL-C was not statistically significant (P=0.11). Discordant individuals with high VLDL-C and low LDL-C experienced the highest rate of incident ASCVD events, 16.9 per 1000 person-years, during follow-up. VLDL-C and lipid discordance are associated with a greater risk of ASCVD and can be estimated from clinically ordered lipid panels to improve ASCVD risk assessment.

New approaches to triglyceride reduction: Is there any hope left?

Triglycerides play a crucial role in the efficient storage of energy in the body. Mild and moderate hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is a heterogeneous disorder with significant association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and peripheral artery disease and represents an important component of the residual ASCVD risk in statin treated patients despite optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. Individuals with severe HTG (>1,000 mg/dL) rarely develop atherosclerosis but have an incremental incidence of acute pancreatitis with significant morbidity and mortality. HTG can occur from a combination of genetic (both mono and polygenic) and environmental factors including poor diet, low physical activity, obesity, medications, and diseases like insulin resistance and other endocrine pathologies. HTG represents a potential target for ASCVD risk and pancreatitis risk reduction, however data on ASCVD reduction by treating HTG is still lacking and HTG-associated acute pancreatitis occurs too rarely to effectively demonstrate treatment benefit. In this review, we address the key aspects of HTG pathophysiology and examine the mechanisms and background of current and emerging therapies in the management of HTG.

Non-HDL cholesterol and residual cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients with and without diabetes: the Western Denmark Heart Registry.

Assessment of residual cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is pivotal for optimizing secondary preventive therapies. This study investigates if non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is associated with residual ASCVD risk in statin-treated ischaemic heart disease (IHD) patients with and without diabetes. Using the Western Denmark Heart Registry, we identified statin-treated patients with IHD examined by coronary angiography (CAG) from 2011 to 2020. Non-HDL-C was assessed within 1 year after CAG. Outcomes were ASCVD (myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death) and all-cause death. Cox regression analyses obtained hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and hypertension. A total of 42 057 patients were included: 8196 patients with diabetes and 33 861 without diabetes. During the median 4.6 years of follow-up, event rates per 1000 person-years of ASCVD were 28.8 (27.1-30.5) and 17.2 (16.5-17.8) among patients with and without diabetes. In patients with diabetes, the adjusted HRs of ASCVD as compared with non-HDL-C < 25th percentile were 1.0 (0.9-1.2), 1.3 (1.1-1.6), and 1.6 (1.2-2.1) for patients in the 25th-74th, 75th-94th, and ≥95th percentiles. In patients without diabetes, the corresponding adjusted HRs were 1.1 (0.9-1.1), 1.2 (1.1-1.4), and 1.7 (1.4-2.0). Results were consistent across sex, age, clinical presentation, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol strata. In statin-treated IHD patients with and without diabetes, non-HDL-C, especially above the 75th percentile, is associated with residual cardiovascular risk. These results have implications for secondary prevention, targeting patients who may benefit most from intensified preventive therapy.

The effect of rosuvastatin alone or in combination with fenofibrate or omega-3 fatty acids on lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a strong, genetically determined, pathogenetic factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to compare the effect of hypolipidemic treatment on Lp(a) levels of patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. We previously randomized patients with mixed hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL-C] > 160 mg/dl and triglycerides > 200 mg/dl) to rosuvastatin monotherapy 40 mg/day (R group, n = 30) or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day combined with fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF group, n = 30) or omega-3 fatty acids 2 g/day (RΩ group, n = 30). In the present post-hoc analysis, we included only the patients whose Lp(a) levels were assessed (16, 16 and 15 in the R, RF and RΩ groups, respectively). Lipid profile and Lp(a) were measured at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and triglyceride levels were observed in all groups. A significant increase in Lp(a) levels was noted in the R (p = 0.017) and RF (p = 0.029) groups, while no significant difference was seen in the RΩ group (p = NS). Regarding Lp(a) elevations, no differences were found between groups. In the R group, a strong negative correlation between the changes in Lp(a) and LDL-C (r = -0.500, p = 0.049) was observed, while a significant negative correlation between the changes in Lp(a) and triglycerides (r = -0.531, p = 0.034) was noted in the RF group. Rosuvastatin and/or fenofibrate treatment increases Lp(a) levels in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Novel therapies should target Lp(a) level reduction to decrease the residual ASCVD risk in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Evolution of More Aggressive LDL-Cholesterol Targets and Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

Over the last half-century, discussions on the exact targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction have evolved towards a more aggressive approach with lower LDL-C targets, particularly for high-risk patients with pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). A wealth of cardiovascular outcome trials have shown the efficacy of statin therapy in general, as well as the incremental impact of high-intensity statin therapy in particular. More recent trials have further demonstrated the impact of non-statin therapies, including ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and, most recently, bempedoic acid, on reducing ASCVD outcomes. The availability of these and other newer therapies has prompted clinicians to strive for lower LDL-C targets to address residual ASCVD risk after statin therapy. This paper will provide an overview of the historical trends in lipid management and therapeutics and review the current state of evidence for lower LDL-C targets in clinical guidelines and recommendations.

Abstract 17120: ARO-ANG3, an Investigational RNAi Therapeutic, Silences the Expression of ANGPTL3 and Decreases Atherogenic Lipoproteins in Patients With Mixed Dyslipidemia: ARCHES-2 Study Results

Background: Angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) regulates lipoprotein metabolism by inhibiting lipoprotein and endothelial lipases. ANGPTL3 loss-of-function carriers have decreased circulating triglycerides (TGs), LDL-C, and HDL-C, and a lower risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). ARO-ANG3 is an investigational RNAi therapeutic designed to inhibit hepatic ANGPTL3 expression and reduce atherogenic lipoproteins. Aim: We report end-of-study results (data cutoff 09 December 2022) from ARCHES-2, a Phase 2b double-blind, placebo (pbo)-controlled study (NCT04832971) to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ARO-ANG3 in adults with mixed dyslipidemia (MD). Methods: Patients with fasting TGs 150-499 mg/dL and LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dL were randomized to receive 50 mg, 100 mg or 200 mg ARO-ANG3 or pbo by subcutaneous injections on Day 1 and Week 12. Patients were on a stable diet and optimal lipid-lowering therapies. The primary endpoint was the percent change in TGs from baseline at Week 24. Liver fat was assessed at baseline and Week 24 in a subset of patients with hepatic steatosis. Mixed models repeated measures was used for statistical analyses. Results: At Week 24, ARO-ANG3 decreased ANGPTL3 (up to 77%), TGs (up to 56%), remnant cholesterol (up to 56%), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) (up to 20%). Other lipoproteins including LDL-C, non-HDL-C, lipoprotein(a) and HDL-C were also decreased. Liver fat decreased similarly in ARO-ANG3 and pbo groups. TEAEs were consistent with those expected in this patient population and with associated underlying comorbidities. Conclusions: ARCHES-2 data demonstrate ARO-ANG3 efficacy by significantly lowering ANGPTL3 and atherogenic triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs), LDL and total apoB in patients with MD. The favorable changes in serum lipids and lipoproteins and safety profile support the potential of ARO-ANG3 to treat residual ASCVD risk in patients with elevated TRLs not at LDL-C goal.

Non-HDL cholesterol and residual risk of cardiovascular events in patients with ischemic heart disease and well-controlled LDL cholesterol: a cohort study

Identifying patients at high residual risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) despite statin-treatment is of paramount clinical importance. We aim to investigate if non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) identifies residual risk of ASCVD and death in statin-treated patients with ischemic heart disease and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤ 1.8mmol/L. Leveraging Danish regional and national registries, we identified statin-treated patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent coronary angiography (CAG) and attained LDL-C ≤ 1.8mmol/L within a year post-CAG. Outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), ASCVD (MI or ischemic stroke), and all-cause death occurring from one year after CAG to end of follow-up. Cox regression analyses obtained adjusted hazard ratios (HR). Between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, we included 23,641 statin-treated patients with ischemic heart disease and LDL-C ≤ 1.8mmol/L. During median follow-up of 4.1 years (IQR 2.4-6.1), 893 (3.8%) patients developed MI, 1207 (5.1%) ASCVD, and 3054 (12.9%) patients died. For ASCVD the adjusted HRs (95% confidence interval) for non-HDL-C < 25th percentile (<1.7mmol/L) versus 25th-74th (1.7-2.1mmol/L), 75th-94th (2.2-2.6mmol/L), and ≥95th (≥2.7mmol/L) percentile were 1.1 (0.9-1.3), 1.4 (1.1-1.7), and 1.8 (1.4-2.4), and for all-cause death 1.0 (0.9-1.1), 1.2 (1.1-1.4), and 1.4 (1.2-1.7), respectively. In a contemporary secondary prevention cohort of patients with well-managed LDL-C, non-HDL-C emerges as an easily accessible marker to detect patients facing high residual risk of ASCVD and death. These findings are important for preventive strategies extending beyond LDL-C targets. Research grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation.

Contribution of intestinal triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to residual atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes on statin therapy

Aims/hypothesisThis study explored the hypothesis that significant abnormalities in the metabolism of intestinally derived lipoproteins are present in individuals with type 2 diabetes on statin therapy. These abnormalities may contribute to residual CVD risk.MethodsTo investigate the kinetics of ApoB-48- and ApoB-100-containing lipoproteins, we performed a secondary analysis of 11 overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes who were treated with lifestyle counselling and on a stable dose of metformin who were from an earlier clinical study, and compared these with 11 control participants frequency-matched for age, BMI and sex. Participants in both groups were on a similar statin regimen during the study. Stable isotope tracers were used to determine the kinetics of the following in response to a standard fat-rich meal: (1) apolipoprotein (Apo)B-48 in chylomicrons and VLDL; (2) ApoB-100 in VLDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) and LDL; and (3) triglyceride (TG) in VLDL.ResultsThe fasting lipid profile did not differ significantly between the two groups. Compared with control participants, in individuals with type 2 diabetes, chylomicron TG and ApoB-48 levels exhibited an approximately twofold higher response to the fat-rich meal, and a twofold higher increment was observed in ApoB-48 particles in the VLDL1 and VLDL2 density ranges (all p < 0.05). Again comparing control participants with individuals with type 2 diabetes, in the latter, total ApoB-48 production was 25% higher (556 ± 57 vs 446 ± 57 mg/day; p < 0.001), conversion (fractional transfer rate) of chylomicrons to VLDL was around 40% lower (35 ± 25 vs 82 ± 58 pools/day; p=0.034) and direct clearance of chylomicrons was 5.6-fold higher (5.6 ± 2.2 vs 1.0 ± 1.8 pools/day; p < 0.001). During the postprandial period, ApoB-48 particles accounted for a higher proportion of total VLDL in individuals with type 2 diabetes (44%) compared with control participants (25%), and these ApoB-48 VLDL particles exhibited a fivefold longer residence time in the circulation (p < 0.01). No between-group differences were seen in the kinetics of ApoB-100 and TG in VLDL, or in LDL ApoB-100 production, pool size and clearance rate. As compared with control participants, the IDL ApoB-100 pool in individuals with type 2 diabetes was higher due to increased conversion from VLDL2.Conclusions/interpretationAbnormalities in the metabolism of intestinally derived ApoB-48-containing lipoproteins in individuals with type 2 diabetes on statins may help to explain the residual risk of CVD and may be suitable targets for interventions.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02948777.Graphical

Clinical utility of inflammatory and genetic biomarkers for cardiovascular disease prevention, categorization, and treatment.

The complex interplay of increased atherogenic lipoproteins, inflammation, and immune activation hallmarks the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death, yet risk estimator tools lack comprehensiveness for genetic/inflammatory biomarkers associated with ASCVD. Unexplained ASCVD risk necessitates a better understanding of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention variables. This article discusses the clinical utility of genetic and inflammatory biomarkers for ASCVD risk prediction, management, treatment, and recategorization into primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. Furthermore, nurse practitioners (NPs) should use a ternary prevention classification system instead of the current binary system to mitigate risk in the large group of patients with subclinical ASCVD. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)-linearly associated with ASCVD-and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase-A 2 (Lp-PLA 2 ) and myeloperoxidase (MPO), both associated with plaque vulnerability/rupture, are inflammatory biomarkers. Elevated hs-CRP, MPO, and Lp-PLA 2 treatment requires addressing root causes of elevation (e.g., obesity, insulin resistance, tobacco use, gingival disease, and chronic autoimmune/infectious conditions). In addition, haptoglobin (Hp) phenotype determines the antioxidant potential of Hp. Haptoglobin phenotype, a root cause of ASCVD, is a one-time test. Individuals with Hp 2-2 should adopt a gluten-free diet to reduce endothelial and intestinal inflammation. Nurse practitioners should use stricter glycemic goals (hemoglobin A1c ≤6.5%) and add daily vitamin E if this group has type 2 diabetes. Genetic/inflammatory biomarkers should be used to better predict ASCVD risk and tailor primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention treatment. Clinical use of these biomarkers reaches beyond the standard of care to reduce residual ASCVD risk.

Triglycerides Revisited: is Hypertriglyceridaemia a Necessary Therapeutic Target in Cardiovascular Disease?

Despite the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk reduction achieved by low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy, residual ASCVD risk still exists. Previous epidemiological studies have suggested high plasma triglycerides (TG) levels as a risk factor or risk marker for ASCVD independent of LDL-C levels. In this review, we highlighted the underlying pathophysiology of hypertriglyceridaemia, the mechanistic action of therapeutic agents, the interpretation of conflicting results on recent clinical trials, and the present options for primary and secondary prevention. The benefits of fibrates-induced reduction in TG and increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol might outweigh the disadvantages of increasing LDL-C levels in primary prevention. In the secondary CVD prevention, using eicosapentaenoic acid without docosahexaenoic acid, in addition to statins, will be beneficial. This comprehensive review may prove useful for the development of novel approaches that target hypertriglyceridaemia in future.

Uptake of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies for secondary prevention in community practice

Nearly two-thirds of individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) do not reach target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol despite statin therapy. Three novel lipid-lowering therapies have proven to further reduce ASCVD beyond statins, including: ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), and icosapent ethyl. This study evaluated the use of these three agents in 728,423 individuals with ASCVD from 89 US health systems from 01/2018 through 03/2021 using the electronic health record. As of 2021, only 6.0% of ASCVD patients were on ezetimibe, 1.6% were on a PCSK9i, and 1.3% on icosapent ethyl, with utilization only marginally increasing over the study period. Addressing the underutilization of non-statin lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention is a critical step in improving the treatment gap of patients with residual risk of ASCVD.

The effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on apoB-48 in dyslipidemic patients treated with statin: A prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group trial in Japan (PROUD48 study).

We compared the lowering effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on fasting apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 (apoB-48), a marker that reflects postprandial hypertriglyceridemia, which is one of the residual risks for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) with statin treatment. This prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group trial was conducted at 4 medical institutions between April 2020 and May 2022. A total of 126 ambulatory patients with dyslipidemia receiving statin treatment for more than 4 weeks, aged 20-79 years with fasting triglyceride (TG) levels of ≥177 mg/dl were randomly assigned to 16-week pemafibrate 0.4 mg per day treatment group (PEMA, n = 63) or omega-3 fatty acid ethyl 4 g per day treatment group (OMEGA-3, n = 63). The primary endpoint was the percentage change in fasting apoB-48 from baseline to week 16. The percentage changes in fasting apoB-48 in PEMA and OMEGA-3 were -50.8% (interquartile range -62.9 to -30.3%) and -17.5% (-38.3 to 15.3%) (P < 0.001), respectively. As the secondary endpoints, the changes in fasting apoB-48 in PEMA and OMEGA-3 were -3.10 μg/ml (-5.63 to -1.87) and -0.90 μg/ml (-2.95 to 0.65) (P < 0.001), respectively. Greater decreases with significant differences in the percentage changes in TG, remnant lipoprotein cholesterol, apoC-III, fasting plasma glucose, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase were observed in PEMA, compared with OMEGA-3. Greater increases with significant differences in those in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, apoA-I, and apoA-II were observed in PEMA, compared with OMEGA-3. PEMA showed anti-atherosclerotic lipoprotein profiles in gel-permeation high-performance liquid chromatography analyses, compared with OMEGA-3. Although adverse events occurred in 9 of 63 (14.3%) patients in PEMA and 3 of 63 (4.8%) patients in OMEGA-3, no serious adverse events associated with drug were observed in either group. This is the first randomized trial to compare the lowering effects of pemafibrate and omega-3 fatty acid ethyl on fasting apoB-48. We concluded that pemafibrate was superior to omega-3 fatty acid ethyl in lowering effect of fasting apoB-48. Pemafibrate is expected to reduce the residual risk for ASCVD with statin treatment. https://rctportal.niph.go.jp/en, identifier jRCTs071200011.

Residual Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Focus on Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) caused by atherosclerosis is the leading cause of death worldwide. The level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), considered as the initiator of atherosclerosis, is the most widely used predictor for CVD risk and LDL-C has been the primary target for lipid-lowering therapies. However, residual CVD risk remains high even with very low levels of LDL-C. This residual CVD risk may be due to remnant cholesterol, high triglyceride levels, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), which is calculated as total cholesterol minus HDL-C (and represents the cholesterol content of all atherogenic apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins), has emerged as a better risk predictor for CVD than LDL-C and an alternative target for CVD risk reduction. Major international guidelines recommend evaluating non-HDL-C as part of atherosclerotic CVD risk assessment, especially in people with high triglycerides, diabetes, obesity, or very low LDL-C. A non-HDL-C target of <130 mg/dL (3.4 mmol/L) has been recommended for patients at very high risk, which is 30 mg/dL (0.8 mmol/L) higher than the corresponding LDL-C target goal. Non-HDL-C lowering approaches include reducing LDL-C and triglyceride levels, increasing HDL-C, or targeting multiple risk factors simultaneously. However, despite the growing evidence for the role of non-HDL-C in residual CVD risk, and recommendations for its assessment in major guidelines, non-HDL-C testing is not routinely done in clinical practice. Thus, there is a need for increased awareness of the need for non-HDL-C testing for ascertaining CVD risk and concomitant prevention of CVD.

Dietary and Physiological Factors Affecting Lipid Metabolism and Cardiovascular Risk.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The risk of developing CVD is associated with an unhealthy lifestyle. A high level of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) is a primary risk factor for ASCVD. However, even if the LDL-C management target has been achieved, hypertriglyceridemia and a high level of total cholesterol minus high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (non-HDL-C), which contains cholesterol concentrations of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, are considered a significant residual risk factor for ASCVD and consequently the management of these conditions is important for controlling the residual risk for ASCVD.