Training Opportunities For Residents Research Articles

Reconsidering the residency training pathway for ambulatory care pharmacists

Ambulatory care, commonly found in primary care settings, is a growing area of pharmacy practice supported by an expanding number of residency training opportunities in this setting. As this practice expands, the profession has chosen to adopt structures that define it as a specialty practice area, a departure from the medical profession. A key example of this definition is the profession’s alignment of residency training for this setting within postgraduate year 2 standards. In this commentary, we explore the implications of this approach and share experience from more than 20 years of statewide ambulatory care residency training in Minnesota. We question whether current training expectations are rooted in an objective evaluation of the knowledge and skills required for ambulatory care pharmacy practice. Ultimately, we call on practice leaders to take account of the impact on current training expectations for learners and pharmacy workforce development and seek a rationalization of the training pathway for ambulatory care practice.

Medical Therapies to Conquer Surgical Diseases: Gallstone Disease May Be the Next Frontier.

Over the past half century, diseases that were predominantly treated surgically have transitioned to less invasive medical therapies. Such diseases that are now effectively treated with medicine are (1) peptic ulcer disease (PUD), (2) coronary artery disease (CAD), and (3) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Likewise, gallstone disease may soon follow this trend. Currently, the gold standard treatment of symptomatic gallstones is laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Though one of the most common surgeries in the United States, certain cases of acute and gangrenous cholecystitis can be some of the most difficult surgeries to perform. Advancements in neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) inhibitor medical therapies will alter gallstone disease management and the mainstream role of surgical interventions. This focus on less invasive therapies will greatly impact the quality of patient care, financial obligations, and even resident training opportunities.

Improvement of access to mental health care through implementing telehealth services by clinical pharmacist practitioners

AbstractThe nationwide shortage of psychiatric providers delays patients from receiving vital mental health (MH) treatments. Mental Health clinical pharmacist practitioners (CPPs) are qualified to provide comprehensive medication management (CMM) services and expand care; however, many MH interdisciplinary teams have not incorporated MH CPPs or have not optimized their role. The purpose of this paper is to highlight how MH CPPs leveraged telemedicine to provide CMM to outpatient MH clinics requiring provisional coverage for other prescribing providers. This paper also reviews supplemental services and barriers to implementation. The Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN) 6 Clinical Resource Hub‐Telemental Health (CRH‐TMH) is a centralized interdisciplinary team that provides telemental health services to veterans through coordination with their local Veterans Health Administration Health Care Systems located in North Carolina and Virginia. The MH CPPs serve as advanced practice providers with a scope of practice that authorizes prescriptive authority including controlled substances. The VISN 6 CRH‐TMH program was initiated in 2020 and expanded from one MH CPP to include three MH CPPs and a MH CPP supervisor. Since initiation, the MH CPPs have supported 10 outpatient MH clinics. From October 2021 to March 2023, the MH CPPs have completed 5080 clinical encounters. The MH CPPs decreased phone appointments and increased the percentage of video‐to‐home encounters from 56% in fiscal year 2021 to 91% by March fiscal year 23. Virtual same‐day access was implemented at three locations and the substance use disorder program provided timely access to life‐saving treatments. The joint intake clinic optimized veterans' intake into the MH clinic by the therapist providing diagnostic services and the CPP performing CMM during the same appointment. The telehealth learning experience increased training opportunities for residents. The success of this initiative further supports the expansion of MH CPPs as advanced practice providers.

Analyzing the Visibility of Gender-Affirming Surgery Education on US Plastic Surgery Residency Program Web Sites.

As the demand for gender affirmation grows, teaching gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) programs has become increasingly important. Residency applicants interested in GAS often use program web sites to explore potential training opportunities. Our study aimed to quantify the GAS training opportunities promoted on residency program web sites and determine the characteristics of programs likely to promote GAS training. An assessment of 88 integrated PRS residency programs' web sites was conducted between 2021 and 2022. Plastic and reconstructive surgery residency and institutional webpages were queried for geographical location, training opportunities in GAS through residency or fellowship, and the number of faculty performing GAS. Descriptive statistics and multivariable regressions were used to describe and identify factors associated with increased GAS residency training opportunities. Twenty-six percent of PRS residencies mentioned training opportunities for GAS on their web sites. Gender-affirming surgery fellowships were offered at 7% of institutions, and an additional 7% were available via adjunct academic programs. Programs with faculty practicing GAS were 54% more likely to mention GAS on their residency page (odds ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.21; P = 0.009). Few PRS residency programs mention GAS on their web sites. As GAS becomes a more robust component of plastic surgery, appropriate information about the extent of GAS training should be available for applicants. Determining how local, state, and federal policies impact programs' abilities to highlight GAS should be investigated in future studies.

Interest in Rural Training Experiences in a Canadian Psychiatry Residency Program.

With the large majority of mental health professionals concentrated in urban settings, people living in rural and remote areas face significant barriers to accessing mental health care. Recognizing that early exposure is associated with future practice in rural and remote locations, we sought to obtain baseline data regarding interest in expanded rural residency training opportunities and academic teaching. In March 2021, all psychiatry residents at the University of Alberta (UofA) were invited to complete a 19-question survey that included both closed-ended (age, gender, year of study, rural experience, interest in rural training, etc.) and open-ended questions (challenges, barriers, academic training, and other comments). A reflexive thematic analysis using an inductive and semantic approach was completed on the comments. 36 residents completed the survey (response rate, 75%). Significant associations were identified between previous rural training experience and interest in rural psychiatry training and practice. Female residents and junior residents were significantly more interested in rural training experiences than their counterparts. Thematic analysis noted concerns with the financial costs of accommodation and transportation, high service burden, continuity of care and isolation from their cohort. Many were interested in academic sessions on the realities of rural practice; approaches to collaborative care; and strategies on culturally relevant care; specifically Indigenous health. The University of Alberta has highlighted a focus on improving equity and accountability; and with a large rural catchment region; the residency program is well positioned to make training adjustments to diversify training. Based on our findings we have incorporated rural rotations for incoming residents and have developed further rural academic content to support our responsiveness and accountability to the rural and northern communities we are committed to serving. Future research should review the impact of rural training exposure in medical specialties on recruitment and retention as well as on healthcare outcomes.

Tracheostomy Performed by a Head and Neck Surgeon Under the Supervision of an Intensive Care Unit Specialists in the COVID-19 Era: A Retrospective Analysis

Background and Objectives Tracheostomy is a relatively safe procedure, and the recent emergence of COVID-19 has raised the need to perform tracheostomy immediately in the bed of an intensive care unit (ICU) rather than an operating room. The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of complications related to surgical tracheotomy performed in the ICU by an ENT specialist.Materials and Method From March 2019 to January 2022, a total of 101 patients underwent tracheostomy in the ICU. Demographics and complications were classified according to postoperative period.Results Within 24 hours after the procedure, bleeding events were confirmed in 2 patients (2.0%) with mild bleeding. One case (1.0%) of ventricular fibrillation occurred shortly after the procedure. There were no complications from 24 hours to 1 week after procedure. After one week, 4 patients (4.5%) had a local infection, and 3 patients (3.4%) had a tube obstruction. During all follow-up periods, there were no serious side effects such as death, major vascular injury, pneumothroax. No complications were observed throughout the entire period in 6 COVID-19 patients.Conclusion The number of complications of surgical tracheotomy in the ICU performed by a specialist was lower than in previous studies, and there were no complications that delayed treatment or endangered life. The ENT training hospitals should provide sufficient training opportunities for residents to perform surgical tracheostomy and strive to minimize complications associated with the procedure and pre- and post-operative management under the detailed guidance and supervision of specialists.

Vasectomy Training in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey of Residency Program Directors.

Vasectomy is considered a permanent contraceptive method with fewer associated harms than bilateral tubal ligation. However, the number of vasectomy-trained providers may not be meeting the demand for vasectomy in the United States. We describe the vasectomy training landscape in family medicine residencies and factors related to increased procedural training. Program-specific data were collected from the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) national survey of family medicine program directors in 2019. Program characteristics, vasectomy training (eg, time spent, procedural numbers), as well as direct and specific faculty support are described, with bivariate analyses for factors related to procedural competency, defined as more than five vasectomy procedures per resident. We received responses from 250 program directors (response rate=39.8%), with representation across all US regions, and program types. Nearly half (47.5%) offered less than 1 day of vasectomy didactics and/or procedural training; 38.9% of programs reported having a family medicine faculty champion for vasectomy. Only 16 programs (6.8%) reported that their average graduating residents performed more than five vasectomies. Programs with a faculty champion (OR 28.1, CI 3.6-216.4) or family medicine faculty as primary trainer (OR 17.6, CI 2.2-138.2) were more likely to graduate residents who had performed more than five vasectomies. Fewer than 10% of surveyed family medicine residency programs offer adequate vasectomy procedural training. Family medicine faculty who serve as primary trainers and act as faculty champions can increase vasectomy training opportunities for residents, and thereby increase the supply of vasectomy providers in the United States.

Impact of COVID-19 on Emergency Medicine Residency Programs: A Cross-Sectional Study in New York State.

IntroductionThe 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic has caused significant disruptions in the clinical operations of hospitals as well as clinical education, training, and research at academic centers. New York State was among the first and largest epicenters of the pandemic, resulting in significant disruptions across its 29 emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. We conducted a cross-sectional observational study of EM residency programs in New York State to assess the impact of the pandemic on resident education and training programs.MethodsWe surveyed a cross-sectional sample of residency programs throughout New York State in June 2020, in the timeframe immediately after the state’s first “wave” of the pandemic. The survey was distributed to program leadership and elicited information on pandemic-prompted curricular modifications and other educational changes. The survey covered topics related to disruptions in medical education and sought details on solutions to educational issues encountered by programs.ResultsOf the 29 accredited EM residency programs in New York State, leadership from 22 (76%) responded. Of these participating programs, 11 (50%) experienced high pandemic impact on clinical services, 21 (95%) canceled their own trainees’ off-service rotations, 22 (100%) canceled or postponed visiting medical student rotations, 22 (100%) adopted virtual conference formats (most within the first week of the pandemic wave), and 11 (50%) stopped all prospective research (excluding COVID-19 research), while most programs continued retrospective research.ConclusionThis study highlights the profound educational impact of the pandemic on residency programs in one of the hardest- and earliest-hit regions in the United States. Specifically, it highlights the ubiquity of virtual conferencing, the significant impact on research, and the concerns about canceled rotations and missed training opportunities for residents, as well as prehospital and non-physician practitioner trainees. This data should be used to prompt discussion regarding the necessity of alternate educational modalities for pandemic times and the sequelae of implementing these plans.

“Still Caring for the Family”: Condolence Expression Training for Pediatric Residents

ContextInsufficient communication from the medical team following a child's death may compound parental grief. Pediatric residents care for children who die, yet the landscape of condolence expression education within residency programs has not been studied. ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate pediatric residents’ levels of experience and comfort with condolence expression and to assess their needs and desires for training in condolence expression. MethodsA cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey was developed by palliative care clinicians in collaboration with bereaved parents. In 2020, following pilot testing, an electronic survey measuring resident experience with, comfort with, and training on condolence expression was distributed to 202 third-year pediatric residents across 17 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs representing varying sizes and geographic regions. ResultsTen percent of pediatric residents surveyed reported having training on condolence expression. Almost all residents considered condolence expression to be beneficial for bereaved families and most for clinicians, too, yet very very few had formally expressed condolences in their roles as physicians: 83.1% had never written a condolence letter; 85% had never made a condolence phone call; and 90.5% had never attended a memorial event. Commonly reported barriers to condolence expression included lack of experience and training, as well as concern about upsetting families. ConclusionsPediatric residents lack comfort with and training in condolence expression and desire education to address these gaps. These findings should inform development and investigation of educational resources and training opportunities for residents to learn and practice compassionate provision of condolences to grieving families.

Bridging health disparities: a national survey of ambulatory care pharmacists in underserved areas.

Background:There is a shortage of primary care medical providers, particularly in rural communities and communities of racial and ethnic minority groups. Clinical pharmacists can help fill gaps in care among these vulnerable populations.Objective:To identify characteristics of ambulatory care pharmacists that pursue and maintain employment within underserved areas.Methods:An original survey was distributed nationwide to ambulatory care clinical pharmacists in underserved settings. Respondent characteristics were analyzed using descriptive statistics.Results:Of the 111 completed surveys, a majority of respondents were White, non-Hispanic, female, with English as their only spoken language. A majority of pharmacists completed a clinical experience or specialized training focused on underserved care prior to their position. The top three motivators for pharmacists accepting their clinical position as well as staying at their job were passion for caring for underserved populations, the presence of a faculty appointment, or the freedom and flexibility of advanced clinical roles.Conclusions:With a large majority of our respondents identifying as White and unilingual, there remains a large opportunity to increase diversity in the clinical pharmacy ambulatory care workforce caring for underserved populations. There is an observed correlation between early experiential or specialized training in underserved care and pharmacists pursuing employment in these areas. Thus, one potential long-term strategy to diversify and grow the ambulatory care clinical pharmacist workforce in underserved settings is for clinical practice sites to partner with colleges of pharmacy to recruit and maintain quality individuals who can meet the needs of diverse patient populations as well as expand student and resident training opportunities in underserved settings.

Video-based self-assessment enhances laparoscopic skills on a virtual reality simulator: a randomized controlled trial.

Hysterectomy rates are decreasing in many countries, and virtual reality (VR) simulators bring new training opportunities for residents. As coaching interventions while training on a simulated complex procedure represents a resource challenge, alternative strategies to improve surgical skills must be investigated. We sought to determine whether self-guided learning using a video-based self-assessment (SA) leads to improved surgical skills in laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) on a VR simulator. Twenty-four gynecology residents from two university hospitals were randomized into an SA group (n = 12) and a Control group (n = 12). Each participant's baseline performance on a validated VR basic task was assessed. Both groups then performed three virtually simulated LHs during which the participants received no guidance nor feedback. Following each LH, the SA group participants rated the video of their own performance using a generic and a procedure-specific rating scale, while the Control group participants watched an LH video demonstration. The LH videos of both groups' participants were blindly reviewed and rated by expert surgeons, using modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores (OSATS). Objective metrics recorded by the VR simulator were also compared. There was no difference between the groups' baseline performances on the VR basic task. For the first LH, the OSATS-derived scores did not differ between SA and Control groups (9 [7-13] versus 9 [8-14]; p = 0.728). For the third LH, the OSATS-derived scores were higher for the SA group than for the Control group (17 [15-21] versus 15 [11-17], p = 0.039). Between the two groups, the objective metrics did not differ from the first to the third LH. The use of a structured video-based SA leads to improved procedural skills in LH on a VR simulator compared to watching benchmark expert performance, in a population of residents with moderate experience in the operating room.

Pharmacist perceptions of and views on postgraduate year 3 training.

To determine the attitudes and perceptions of pharmacy residency program participants regarding proposed expansion of postgraduate year 3 (PGY3) residency training opportunities. An online questionnaire was emailed to all directors of ASHP-accredited residency programs with a request to distribute the survey among program participants, including residents, preceptors, coordinators, and other pharmacists working with residents. Survey questions assessed participants' views and attitudes about PGY3 programs vs other avenues of career advancement, including potential benefits and limitations, program structure, and ramifications for the profession. Eight hundred forty-five individuals participated in the survey, for a 22.47% response rate. Only 288 pharmacists (34.4%) were familiar with the PGY3 residency training concept. Perceived benefits of PGY3 training, by percentage of respondents citing them, included job specialization (34.41%), an additional year of training (19.93%), and obtaining research skills (5.44%). The main perceived limiting factors included personal finances (21.62%), lack of justification for PGY3 training (13.83%), and time commitments (12.94%). As alternatives to PGY3 training for career advancement, board certifications (49.5%), scholarly activity (19.8%), and leadership in pharmacy organizations (19.2%) were the 3 highest-rated areas. A majority of respondents were opposed to ASHP standardization of PGY3 residency programs (74.3%) and/or had negative preconceptions of the potential impact of expanded PGY3 training initiatives on the job market (80.94%). Overall, surveyed pharmacy residency program participants were opposed to the concept of expanded PGY3 training initiatives and indicated their view that PGY3 training offers limited benefits in terms of professional development. Participants favored on-the-job training and other avenues of career advancement over PGY3 residency training.

A352 Clemens von Pirquet Award Recipient IS IT TIME TO RETHINK THE ALLERGY TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR PEDIATRIC RESIDENTS?

Primary care pediatricians (PCPs) play a critical role in the evaluation of childhood allergic disorders, yet, pediatrician-reported comfort in management of allergic conditions remains insufficient. To date, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) program requirements suggest zero mandatory core or elective rotations in Allergy & Immunology (AI), which limits training opportunities for residents.

Investigating the Efficacy of Anatomical Silicone Models Developed from a 3D Printed Mold for Perineal Repair Suturing Simulation.

There is a scarcity of affordable, validated, standardized and anatomically correct silicone perineum models for the rehearsal of postpartum laceration repair. The purpose of this technical report is to describe and validate evidence for a silicone, perineal repair model created from a 3D printed mold for medical resident training and clinical skills maintenance.A pre-existing model from an open-source royalty-free website was purchased and converted using Fusion360TM (Autodesk Inc., San Rafael, CA, USA) into a stereolithography (.stl) file and altered to produce a negative mold. Using a spatula, a fine silicone layer was first applied inside the mold, followed by a small piece of flesh-colored mesh netting material within the perineal surface area, fitting the width of the mold. The mesh was pressed into the thin layer of silicone, which was meant to provide anatomical structure to prevent the sutures from tearing through the silicone. The remainder of the silicone mix was then poured into the mold, which required three hours to fully set before being removed from the mold. Twelve silicone models were produced and used during a one-hour workshop at the Rural and Remote Conference by 16 obstetrics and gynecology residents and practicing rural physicians, and four facilitators. At the end of the workshop, the participants were provided with a qualitative survey and asked to rate the perceived realism and educational effectiveness of the silicone perineum model as compared to pre-existing simulation models that they have used previously. The overall workshop participant feedback was positive, noting that the models provided more realistic visualization for the suturing simulation of first- and second-degree perineal injuries.The silicone models were considered to be useful in simulation training when attempting first- and second-degreeperineum suturing techniques within a confined space. The overall feedback was positive, noting that they provided more realistic visualization experience compared to pre-existing simulation models, such as beef tongues and synthetic sponges. The feedback from the participants and facilitators included thoughts about how to add additional mesh to the silicone model so the subcutaneous and vaginal plane sutures would hold, as well as increase the size of the vaginal canal size to more accurately represent a postpartum repair. There were also suggestions to alter the colour of the model to be flesh-toned as opposed to pink, to more accurately simulate human tissue.Silicone perineum models, created from a 3D printed mold, are an economical training tool as compared to commercially available, cost prohibitive models. They also provide anatomically accurate simulation training opportunities for residents to learn and maintain clinical skills in perineal repair, as compared to beef tongues and synthetic sponges, which have previously been used in obstetrics and gynecology simulation-based medical education.

90: Choosing route of hysterectomy for benign uterine disease

Hysterectomy is one of the most common procedures in the U.S. and can be performed vaginally, abdominally, or laparoscopically.1 When choosing the surgical route, clinicians consider patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and fulfillment of the patient's medical needs.2,3 We performed an IRB approved retrospective chart review of all hysterectomies for benign disease at a single institution to determine the most common surgical route, indications, complications, and appropriate selection of route.2,3 In total, 157 patient charts were reviewed. Patients in the laparoscopic group were, on average, older and white when compared to the abdominal and vaginal groups. Differences in parity were statistically significant, with vaginal hysterectomies performed most frequently in parous patients. The most common indication for abdominal hysterectomy was fibroid uterus, and the abdominal route was associated with larger uterine weight, longer operating times, greater estimated blood loss, and increased length of stay. Operating room time and blood loss were similar for laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy (Table 1). Abdominal hysterectomy had the highest complication rate of transfusion, readmission, and infection (Table 2). Based on similar uterine weights, more vaginal hysterectomies could be performed rather than laparoscopic. The correlation between race and selection of route is likely attributed to differences in access to care, insurance coverage, and other socioeconomic factors. Choosing the correct route for hysterectomy would result in fewer complications. Next steps include implementing hysterectomy guideline chart in the pre-operative clinic to optimize selection of the most appropriate route.4 Our ultimate goal is to decrease complications, improve patient outcomes, and increase resident training opportunities.

Residency pathways to ambulatory care practice: Essential insights for students, residents, and educators

ObjectiveTo provide a guiding document describing residency training opportunities in ambulatory care for students, postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residents, practicing pharmacists, and pharmacy educators. SummaryStudent pharmacists, residents, practitioners, and educators can benefit from a guiding document describing the various pathways to develop as an ambulatory care practitioner through residency training. The benefits and differences of PGY1 and postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) ambulatory care residency programs are included. ConclusionThere are many possible training options for pharmacists interested in pursuing a career in ambulatory care pharmacy practice. In addition to the required ambulatory and community experience required for all Doctorate of Pharmacy students, postgraduate training in an ambulatory environment can allow for specialization. Candidates for residency training can complete a PGY1 pharmacy residency or a PGY1 community-based pharmacy residency, possibly followed by a PGY2 ambulatory care residency. Career paths for ambulatory care pharmacists vary regionally across the country according to competition for positions, local availability of training programs, and the experience of regional leaders. A comprehensive description of these available training pathways and advantages of each are beneficial for students, residents, practicing pharmacists, and educators.

LO15: Not a hobby anymore: Establishment of the Global Health Emergency Medicine organization at the University of Toronto to facilitate academic careers in global health for faculty and residents

Introduction/Innovation Concept: Demand for training in global health emergency medicine (EM) practice and education across Canada is high and increasing. For faculty with advanced global health EM training, EM departments have not traditionally recognized global health as an academic niche warranting support. To address these unmet needs, expert faculty at the University of Toronto (UT) established the Global Health Emergency Medicine (GHEM) organization to provide both quality training opportunities for residents and an academic home for faculty in the field of global health EM. Methods: Six faculty with training and experience in global health EM founded GHEM in 2010 at a UT teaching hospital, supported by the leadership of the ED chief and head of the Divisions of EM. This initial critical mass of faculty formed a governing body, seed funding was granted from the affiliated hospital practice plan and a five-year strategic academic plan was developed. Curriculum, Tool, or Material: GHEM has flourished at UT with growing membership and increasing academic outputs. Five governing members and 9 general faculty members currently run 18 projects engaging over 60 faculty and residents. Formal partnerships have been developed with institutions in Ethiopia, Congo and Malawi, supported by five granting agencies. Fifteen publications have been authored to date with multiple additional manuscripts currently in review. Nineteen FRCP and CCFP-EM residents have been mentored in global health clinical practice, research and education. Finally, GHEM’s activities have become a leading recruitment tool for both EM postgraduate training programs and the EM department. Conclusion: GHEM is the first academic EM organization in Canada to meet the ever-growing demand for quality global health EM training and to harness and support existing expertise among faculty. The productivity from this collaborative framework has established global health EM at UT as a relevant and sustainable academic career. GHEM serves as a model for other faculty and institutions looking to move global health EM practice from the realm of ‘hobby’ to recognized academic endeavor, with proven academic benefits conferring to faculty, trainees and the institution.

Expanding Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Residency Education Through a Multisite University-Affiliated Model

Introduction: As the health-care system evolves and shifts to value-based payment systems, there is a recognized need to increase the number of ambulatory care trained pharmacists. Objective: The objective of this article is to describe the administrative structure of the University of Minnesota Postgraduate Year 1 (PGY1) Pharmacy Residency program and to encourage adoption of similar models nationally in order to expand ambulatory care residency training opportunities and meet the demand for pharmacist practitioners. Program Structure: The University of Minnesota PGY1 Pharmacy Residency program is a multisite program centered on the practice of pharmaceutical care and provision of comprehensive medication management (CMM) services in ambulatory care settings. The centralized administration of a multisite academic-affiliated training model creates efficiency in the administration process, while allowing sites to focus on clinical training. This model also offers many innovative and unique opportunities to residents. Conclusion: A multisite university-affiliated ambulatory care residency training model provides efficiency in program administration, while successfully accelerating the growth of quality ambulatory care residency training and supporting innovative delivery of shared core learning experiences. Consequently, practice sites grow in their service delivery capacity and quality of care.

Capsule Commentary on Tukey et al., The Impact of a Medical Procedure Service on Patient Safety, Procedure Quality and Resident Training Opportunities

Medical procedure services (MPS) were developed to achieve several aims: 1) train residents in the performance of bedside procedures, 2) routinely provide attending supervision, 3) improve procedural success while reducing complications, and 4) offset resident workload in the era of duty hours restrictions.1–3 The study by Tukey et al.4 examines the impact of a MPS on trainee engagement and procedural safety. They found that resident participation in procedures did not differ when performed by the MPS versus the primary team. Procedures performed by the MPS were more likely to use ultrasound guidance, be supervised by an attending, and were more likely to be completed successfully. However, there was no difference in the primary outcome of overall or individual procedure complication rates. This is not the first study that has failed to show a difference in complications.3 Similar to previous studies, the inability to measure differences in patient outcomes may be the result of selection bias: more procedural referrals to the MPS from inexperienced residents or referrals for more complex procedures that in other hands may have resulted in complications. What does it mean that, when studied rigorously, a MPS does not achieve all desired aims? Perhaps we can draw an analogy between MPS and Rapid Response Teams (RRTs). Both are resource-rich innovations that provide valuable support to hospital providers, but have not yet consistently demonstrated benefits in patient outcomes.5 Like RRTs, hospitals may decide the benefits of a MPS—namely, enhanced resident experience and comfort, improved educational outcomes, and low rates of complications1–3—offset the as yet unproven outcome improvements. The truth is that alternatives are lacking. It is no longer practical or feasible to ensure all Internal Medicine (IM) residents are competent to perform procedures during training. Fewer IM faculty feel comfortable training residents in bedside procedures; they have neither the opportunity nor demand to maintain their skills. The need for safe and timely bedside procedures, however, still exists. MPS offer dedicated experience and training for IM residents, while providing safe and successful procedures for residents and other attendings, who often lack the time and expertise for procedures.

The Impact of a Medical Procedure Service on Patient Safety, Procedure Quality and Resident Training Opportunities

At some academic hospitals, medical procedure services are being developed to provide supervision for residents performing bedside procedures in hopes of improving patient safety and resident education. There is limited knowledge of the impact of such services on procedural complication rates and resident procedural training opportunities. To determine the impact of a medical procedure service (MPS) on patient safety and resident procedural training opportunities. Retrospective cohort analysis comparing characteristics and outcomes of procedures performed by the MPS versus the primary medical service. Consecutive adults admitted to internal medicine services at a large academic hospital who underwent a bedside medical procedure (central venous catheterization, thoracentesis, paracentesis, lumbar puncture) between 1 July 2010 and 31 December 2011. The primary outcome was a composite rate of major complications. Secondary outcomes included resident participation in bedside procedures and use of "best practice" safety process measures. We evaluated 1,707 bedside procedures (548 by the MPS, 1,159 by the primary services). There were no differences in the composite rate of major complications (1.6 % vs. 1.9 %, p = 0.71) or resident participation in bedside procedures (57.0 % vs. 54.3 %, p = 0.31) between the MPS and the primary services. Procedures performed by the MPS were more likely to be successfully completed (95.8 % vs. 92.8 %, p = 0.02) and to use best practice safety process measures, including use of ultrasound guidance when appropriate (96.8 % vs. 90.0 %, p = 0.0004), avoidance of femoral venous catheterization (89.5 vs. 82.7 %, p = 0.02) and involvement of attending physicians (99.3 % vs. 57.0 %, p < 0.0001). Although use of a MPS did not significantly affect the rate of major complications or resident opportunities for training in bedside procedures, it was associated with increased use of best practice safety process measures.