Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

Relationships between postoperative recurrences and standardized uptake value on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

BackgroundThis study aimed to examine postoperative recurrence after curative pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focusing on its relationship with the standardized uptake value (SUV) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). MethodThe postoperative initial recurrence patterns were examined in patients with R- and BR-PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection. Data collected from three prospective clinical trials were retrospectively analysed. ResultsAfter a median follow-up of 29 months, 91 (60 %) of 151 patients experienced postoperative recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all patients was 18 months. The sites of first recurrence were lung-only in 24 (26 %) patients, liver-only in 23 (25 %), local-only in 11 (12 %), peritoneum-only in 10 (11 %), other single site in 5 (5 %), and multiple sites in 19 (21 %) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET at diagnoses ≥5.40 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01–2.61; p = 0.045) and node-positive pathology (HR, 2.01; 95 % CI, 1.32–3.08; p = 0.001) as significant predictors of RFS. Furthermore, the SUVmax at initial diagnosis and after NACRT correlated with liver metastasis. ConclusionR- and BR-PDACs with high SUV on FDG-PET at diagnosis are risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Among patients who undergo surgery after NACRT, those with a high SUVmax at diagnosis or post-NACRT require careful attention for postoperative liver recurrence.

New Biomarkers to Define a Biological Borderline Situation for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results of an Ancillary Study of the PANACHE01-PRODIGE48 Trial.

To investigate in patients treated for a resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)], the prognostic value of baseline carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (CA19-9) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for overall survival (OS), to improve death risk stratification, based on a planned ancillary study from PANACHE01-PRODIGE 48 trial. Biological borderline situation that was first used by the MD Anderson, became a standard practice following the international consensus conference in 2016 to manage PA. Regarding the risk of systemic disease, especially in the setting of "markedly elevated" CA19-9, neoadjuvant therapy is advised to avoid unnecessary surgery, with a risk of early recurrence. To best define biological borderline situations, new biomarkers are needed. Characteristics at diagnosis and OS were compared between patients with or without ctDNA status available. OS was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with a log-rank test. The restricted cubic spline approach was used to identify the optimal threshold for biological parameters for death risk stratification. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were estimated to assess the association of ctDNA status and other parameters with OS. Among the 132 patients from the primary population for analysis in the PANACHE01 -PRODIGE 48 trial, 92(71%) were available for ctDNA status at diagnosis. No selection bias was identified between patients with or without ctDNA status. Fourteen patients (15%) were ctDNA+ and exhibited a higher risk for death [ P = 0.0188; hazard ratio (95% CI): 2.28 (1.12-4.63)]. In the 92 patients with ctDNA status available among the other parameters analyzed, only CA19-9 was statically associated with OS in univariate analysis. Patients with a log of CA19-9 equal or superior to 4.4 that corresponds to a CA19-9 of 80 UI/mL were identified at higher risk for death [ P = 0.0143; hazard ratio (95% CI): 2.2 (1.15-4.19)]. In multivariate analysis, CA19-19 remained independently associated with OS ( P = 0.0323). When combining the 2 biomarkers, the median OS was 19.4 [IC 95%: 3.8-not reached (NR)] months, 30.2 (IC 95%: 17.1-NR) months and NR (IC 95%: 39.3-NR) for "CA19-9 high and ctDNA+ group," "CA19-9 high or ctDNA+ group," and "CA19-9 low and ctDNA- group," respectively (log-rank P = 0.0069). Progress in the management of potentially operable PA remains limited, relying solely on strategies to optimize the sequence of complete treatment, based on modern multidrug chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX, GemNabPaclitaxel) and surgical resection. The identification of risk criteria, such as the existence of systemic disease, is an important issue, currently referred to as "biological borderline disease." Few data, particularly from prospective studies, allow us to identify biomarkers other than CA19-9. Combining ctDNA with CA19-9 could be of interest to best define biological borderline situations in PA.

Recurrence pattern and its risk factors in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma – A retrospective analysis of 272 patients

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of recurrence and their associated risk factors in patients who underwent resection for pancreatic carcinoma. MethodsThis retrospective study included 272 patients, who underwent Ro/R1-resection of PDAC from 2005 to 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen. Risk factors for different recurrence patterns and the prognostic value of recurrence pattern on the overall survival after recurrence were evaluated. Results61 % of the patients experienced recurrence, mostly within the first 12 postoperative months (62 %) and in the form of metastases (87 %). The median overall survival from recurrence was 9.2 months. The preoperative absence of diabetes and the presence of lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for recurrence and a preoperative CA19-9 exceeding 97 U/ml for early recurrence. Additionally, lymph node metastases were associated with a higher risk of metastatic recurrence. Early recurrence, but not the site of recurrence, was identified as an independent prognostic factor for worse overall survival from recurrence. ConclusionThe occurrence of recurrence and especially of early and metastatic recurrence are associated with a worse overall survival. Patients lacking preoperative diabetes, having high preoperative CA19-9 values and lymph node metastases are particularly at risk for (early) recurrence.

A Deep Learning Approach for the Identification of the Molecular Subtypes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Based on Whole Slide Pathology Images

Delayed diagnosis and treatment resistance make pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mortality rates high. Identifying molecular subtypes can improve treatment, but current methods are costly and time-consuming. In this study, deep learning models were utilized to identify histological features that classify PDAC molecular subtypes based on routine hematoxylin-eosin (H&E)-stained histopathological slides. 97 histopathology slides associated with resectable PDAC from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project were utilized to train a deep learning model and tested the performance on 44 needle biopsy material (110 slides) from a local annotated patient cohort. The model achieved balanced accuracy of 96.19% and 83.03% in identifying the classical and basal subtypes of PDAC in the TCGA and the local cohort, respectively. This study provides a promising method to cost-effectively and rapidly classifying PDAC molecular subtypes based on routine H&E slides, potentially leading to more effective clinical management of this disease.

Preoperative level of serum transthyretin as a novel biomarker predicting survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with neoadjuvant therapy

BackgroundSystemic inflammation and altered metabolism are essential hallmarks of cancer. We hypothesized that the rapid turnover protein transthyretin (TTR) (half-life: 2–3 days), compared with the conventional marker albumin (21 days), better reflects the inflammatory/metabolic dynamics of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and is a useful prognostic marker. MethodsSerum TTR and albumin levels were measured in 104 consecutive post-NAT PDAC patients before curative resection. The associations of preoperative TTR and albumin levels with overall survival (OS) after pancreatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe mean (SD) TTR and albumin levels were 21.6 (6.4) mg/dL (normal range: ≥22.0 mg/dL) and 3.9 (0.55) g/dL. A low (<22.0 mg/dL) post-NAT TTR level was associated with an advanced tumor stage and higher CEA and CRP levels. Patients with low TTR levels showed significantly worse OS compared with normal levels (3-year OS 39 % vs. 54 %, P = 0.037), although albumin levels did not. We modified prognostic biomarkers of systemic inflammation/metabolism, such as GPS, PNI, and CONUT scores, using the serum TTR instead of albumin level and successfully showed that modified scores were better associated with OS compared with original scores using serum albumin level. ConclusionsOur data suggest that the TTR level is a promising prognostic biomarker for PDAC patients after NAT.

Futility of Up-Front Resection for Anatomically Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

There are currently no clinically relevant criteria to predict a futile up-front pancreatectomy in patients with anatomically resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. To develop a futility risk model using a multi-institutional database and provide unified criteria associated with a futility likelihood below a safety threshold of 20%. This retrospective study took place from January 2010 through December 2021 at 5 high- or very high-volume centers in Italy. Data were analyzed during April 2024. Participants included consecutive patients undergoing up-front pancreatectomy at the participating institutions. Standard management, per existing guidelines. The main outcome measure was the rate of futile pancreatectomy, defined as an operation resulting in patient death or disease recurrence within 6 months. Dichotomous criteria were constructed to maintain the futility likelihood below 20%, corresponding to the chance of not receiving postneoadjuvant resection from existing pooled data. This study included 1426 patients. The median age was 69 (interquartile range, 62-75) years, 759 patients were male (53.2%), and 1076 had head cancer (75.4%). The rate of adjuvant treatment receipt was 73.7%. For the model construction, the study sample was split into a derivation (n = 885) and a validation cohort (n = 541). The rate of futile pancreatectomy was 18.9% (19.2% in the development and 18.6% in the validation cohort). Preoperative variables associated with futile resection were American Society of Anesthesiologists class (95% CI for coefficients, 0.68-0.87), cancer antigen (CA) 19.9 serum levels (95% CI, for coefficients 0.05-0.75), and tumor size (95% CI for coefficients, 0.28-0.46). Three risk groups associated with an escalating likelihood of futile resection, worse pathological features, and worse outcomes were identified. Four discrete conditions (defined as CA 19.9 levels-adjusted-to-size criteria: tumor size less than 2 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 1000 U/mL; tumor size less than 3 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 500 U/mL; tumor size less than 4 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 150 U/mL; and tumor size less than 5 cm with CA 19.9 levels less than 50 U/mL) were associated with a futility likelihood below 20%. Both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in patients fulfilling the criteria. In this study, a preoperative model (MetroPancreas) and dichotomous criteria to determine the risk of futile pancreatectomy were developed. This might help in selecting patients for up-front resection or neoadjuvant therapy.

Predictors for low rates of surgical resection in elderly patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective case-control study.

Predictors for low rates of surgical resection in elderly patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective case-control study.

Predictors of occult metastases in potentially Resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundPatients with resectable (R) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) sometimes show unexpected liver, peritoneal, and para-aortic lymph node metastases intraoperatively. Despite radical pancreatectomy, a nonnegligible number of patients relapse within 6 months after surgery. The aim of this study was to identify the preoperative predictors of occult metastases (OM), defined as intraoperative distant metastases or within 6 months after pancreatectomy. Materials and methodsThis study included patients with R and BR PDAC who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy or staging laparoscopy between 2006 and 2021. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox hazard analyses were performed to identify the preoperative predictors of OM and to assess the impact of these factors on prognosis after pancreatectomy. ResultsOf the 279 patients, OM was observed intraoperatively in 47 and postoperatively in 34. In the OM group, there were no differences in prognosis between patients who had intraoperative metastases and recurrence within 6 months (median survival time [MST], 18.1 vs. 12.9 months), and between patients who underwent pancreatectomy and those who did not (MST, 13.9 vs. 18.1 months). Preoperative tumor size ≥22 mm (odds ratio [OR], 2.03; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.16–3.53; p = 0.013) and preoperative CA19–9 level ≥ 118.8 U/mL (OR, 2.64; 95 % CI, 1.22–5.73; p = 0.014) were significant predictors of OM. Additionally, positive OM predictors were strong independent prognostic factors for overall survival after pancreatectomy (hazard ratio, 2.47; 95 % CI, 1.54–3.98; p < 0.001). ConclusionMultidisciplinary treatment strategies should be considered for patients with predictors of OM to avoid inappropriate surgical interventions.

What is the optimal surgical approach for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic neck? - a retrospective cohort study.

The appropriate surgical approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is determined by the tumor's relation to the porto-mesenteric axis. Although the extent and location of lymphadenectomy is dependent on the type of resection, a pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), distal pancreatectomy (DP), or total pancreatectomy (TP) are considered equivalent oncologic operations for pancreatic neck tumors. Therefore, we aimed to assess differences in histopathological and oncological outcomes for surgical approaches in the treatment of pancreatic neck tumors. Patients with resected PDAC located in the pancreatic neck were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2020). Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. Furthermore, patients with 90-day mortality and R2-resections were excluded from the multivariable Cox-regression analysis. Among 846 patients, 58% underwent PD, 25% DP, and 17% TP with similar R0-resection rates (p = 0.722). Significant differences were observed in nodal positivity (PD:44%, DP:34%, TP:57%, p < 0.001) and mean-number of examined lymph nodes (PD:17.2 ± 10.4, DP:14.7 ± 10.5, TP:21.2 ± 11.0, p < 0.001). Furthermore, inadequate lymphadenectomy (< 12 nodes) was observed in 30%, 44%, and 19% of patients undergoing PD, DP, and TP, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis yielded similar overall survival after DP (HR:0.83, 95%CI:0.63-1.11), while TP was associated with worse survival (HR:1.43, 95%CI:1.08-1.89) compared to PD. While R0-rates are similar amongst all approaches, DP is associated with inadequate lymphadenectomy which may result in understaging disease. However, this had no negative influence on survival. In the premise that an oncological resection of the pancreatic neck tumor is feasible with a partial pancreatectomy, no benefit is observed by performing a TP.

Survival benefit associated with screening of patients at elevated risk for pancreatic cancer.

All patients enrolled in screening at a High-Risk Pancreatic Cancer Clinic (HRC) from July 2013 to June 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database and compared to patients evaluated at a Surgical Oncology Clinic (SOC) at the same institution during the same period. Clinical outcomes of patients selected for surgical resection, particularly clinicopathologic stage and overall survival, were compared. Among 826 HRC patients followed for a median (IQR) of 2.3 (0.8-4.2) years, 128 were selected for surgical resection and compared to 402 SOC patients selected for resection. Overall survival was significantly longer among HRC patients (median survival: not reached vs. 2.6 years, p < 0.001). Among 31 HRC and 217 SOC patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC), the majority of HRC patients were diagnosed with stage 0 disease (carcinoma in situ), while the majority of SOC patients were diagnosed with stage II disease (p < 0.001). Overall survival after resection of invasive PDAC was also significantly longer among HRC patients compared to SOC patients (median survival 5.5 vs. 1.6 years, p = 0.002). Patients at increased risk for PDAC and followed with guideline-based screening exhibited downstaging of disease and improved survival from PDAC in comparison to patients who were not screened.

Postoperative Adverse Events Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Surgery for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer in a Phase 2 Clinical Trial (Alliance A021501).

Postoperative adverse events (AEs) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PC) treated with neoadjuvant therapy and pancreatectomy in the national cooperative group setting have not been previously characterized. We conducted a preplanned secondary analysis of patients enrolled on the Alliance A021501 clinical trial to quantify perioperative AE rates. The A021501 phase 2 trial randomized patients with BR-PC to receive 8 doses of mFOLFIRINOX (Arm 1) or 7 doses of mFOLFIRINOX and hypofractionated radiotherapy (Arm 2), followed by pancreatectomy (December 31, 2016 to May 31, 2019). Adverse events were assessed 90 days after pancreatectomy. Of 126 enrolled patients, 51 (40%) underwent pancreatectomy (n = 32, Arm 1; n = 19, Arm 2) at 28 institutions. Five (10%) patients required reoperation within 90 days; 56% of patients (n = 27/48) experienced at least one grade 3 or higher AE (50% vs. 67%, p = 0.37). Ninety-day mortality was 2.0%. Readmission was less frequent in Arm 1 (16% vs. 42%, p = 0.05), but there were no differences between study arms in rates of reoperation (13% vs. 5%), pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage (9% vs. 16%), or wound infection (6% vs. 16%). Pancreatic fistula or intra-abdominal abscess requiring drainage was associated with receipt of adjuvant therapy (p = 0.012). No difference in overall survival was observed based on occurrence of postoperative AEs (hazard ratio = 1.1; 95% confidence interval 0.5-2.6). In this multicenter study, rates of postoperative AEs were consistent with those previously reported. Multimodality trials of preoperative therapy for BR-PC may be performed in the cooperative group setting with careful quality assurance and safety monitoring. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02839343.

Identifying suitable candidates for pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundTo evaluate long-term quality of life and survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PDEL) and identify candidates. MethodsPatients with resectable PDAC with ≥1 examined lymph node (LN) during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and were divided into the PD with standard lymphadenectomy (PDSL) and PDEL groups. Perioperative data, long-term quality of life and survival were compared, and the prognostic effect of LNs ± in every peripancreatic station were analysed. ResultsScreening 446 PDAC patients, 237 and 126 were included in the PDSL and PDEL groups, respectively. The PDEL group showed a longer operation time, greater intraoperative blood loss, severe diarrhoea, a higher incidence of grade III complications. Notably, the PDEL patients experienced significant relief from low back pain and diarrhoea, with an obvious survival advantage (p = 0.037), especially in patients with preoperative tumor contact with vascular and pathological N0; however, LNs+ in any station (No. 8p, 12, 14, or 16) were associated with a poorer prognosis. The vascular reconstruction, T and N stage were independent risk factors for survival. ConclusionPDEL can relieve symptoms and prolong the survival of PDAC patients with acceptable complications, and EL should be performed regardless of preoperative LN enlargement.

Two-tier architecture-based grading for pancreatic cancer outperforms traditional grading.

A novel architecture-based grading system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is tested against traditional grading. A total of 103 PDAC resections were graded by College of American Pathologists/American Joint Committee on Cancer (CAP/AJCC) guidelines and by a system using an architectural pattern (dispersed larger duct = low grade vs dense smaller duct = high grade). Survival analyses and interobserver variability were assessed. In total, 114 cases from a public data set were used for validation. Median overall survivals were 15 and 36 months for architectural high-grade and low-grade cases, respectively (P<.001). Conversely, CAP/AJCC grading showed no survival difference between well-differentiated and moderately differentiated tumors (P=.545). Architecture-based grading remained prognostically significant for recurrence-free survival (P=.004), but CAP/AJCC grading was not (P=.226). Adjusted for stage and margin status, architectural high-grade PDACs showed a hazard ratio of 2.69 relative to low grade (P<.001) for survival. The validation cohort confirmed prognostic differences in overall (P<.001) and recurrence-free survival (P=.027) for the architecture-based system, outperforming CAP/AJCC grading. Architecture-based grading exhibited a Cohen's ĸ value of 0.710 (substantial agreement), superior to traditional grading (0.488, moderate agreement). Grading PDAC based on architectural pattern results in superior prognostication and reproducibility vs CAP/AJCC grading.

Effect of surgical approach on early return to intended oncologic therapy after resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Although robotic pancreatectomy may facilitate an earlier functional recovery, the impact of a robotic pancreatectomy program during its early experience on the timing of return to intended oncologic therapy (RIOT) after surgery is unknown. In this retrospective cohort study, we used propensity score matching with a 1:2 ratio to compare patients who underwent robotic or open surgery (distal pancreatectomy or pancreatoduodenectomy) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) during the first 3years of our robotic pancreatectomy experience (January 2018-December 2021). Generalized estimating equations modeling was used to evaluate the effect of surgical approach on early RIOT, defined as adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 8weeks after surgery, and late RIOT, defined as initiation within 12weeks after surgery. The matched cohort included 26 patients who underwent robotic pancreatectomy and 52 patients who underwent open pancreatectomy. Rates of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were 96.2% and 78.9%, respectively. Rate of early RIOT in the robotic group (73.1% was higher than that in the open group (44.2%; P = 0.018). In multivariable analysis, a robotic approach was associated with early RIOT (odds ratio, 3.54; 95% confidence interval 1.08-11.62; P = 0.038). Surgical approach did not impact late RIOT (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval 0.71-14.38; P = 0.128). Compared with open pancreatectomy, robotic pancreatectomy did not delay RIOT. In fact, odds of early RIOT were increased, which supports the oncological safety of our robotic pancreatectomy program during its implementation.

Margin clearance greater than 1 mm in nodal-positive pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients: multicentre retrospective analysis.

The introduction of the 1 mm cut-off for resection margin according to the Leeds Pathology Protocol has transformed the concept of surgical radicality. Its impact on nodal-positive resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients is unclear. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of margin clearance on survival among resected, nodal-positive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients whose specimens were analysed according to the Leeds Pathology Protocol. Data were collected retrospectively from multicentre clinical databases. Resected patients with nodal involvement were included. Overall survival and disease-free survival were analysed according to minimum reported margin clearances of 0, 0.5, 1, and 2 mm. The results are reported separately for patients who had not undergone venous resection and for patients for whom data were available regarding the superior mesenteric vein-facing margin or the vein specimen. The eighth edition of TNM classification by the AJCC was used. The study comprised 290 stage IIB patients and 215 stage III patients without venous resection. The superior mesenteric vein margin analysis comprised 127 stage IIB patients and 198 stage III patients. The different resection margin distances were not associated with overall survival and disease-free survival among patients without venous resection (P > 0.050). Receiving adjuvant therapy was associated with longer overall survival among stage IIB patients (P = 0.034) and stage III patients (P = 0.003) and with longer disease-free survival among stage III patients (P < 0.001). In this study, a margin clearance greater than 1 mm showed no clear effect on overall survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with nodal involvement, whereas adjuvant therapy was confirmed to be essential to ensure longer overall survival.

Prognostic Significance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT Radiomics in Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Curative Surgery.

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of PET/CT radiomics to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We enrolled 627 patients with resectable PDAC who underwent preoperative 18 F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent curative surgery. Radiomics analysis of the PET/CT images for the primary tumor was performed using the Chang-Gung Image Texture Analysis toolbox. Radiomics features were subjected to least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select the most valuable imaging features of OS. The prognostic significance was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Conventional PET parameters and LASSO score were assessed as predictive factors for OS by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. During a mean follow-up of 28.8 months, 378 patients (60.3%) died. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, tumor differentiation, resection margin status, tumor stage, and LASSO score were independent prognostic factors for OS (HR, 1.753, 1.669, 2.655, and 2.946; all P < 0.001, respectively). The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the LASSO score had better predictive performance for OS than conventional PET parameters. The LASSO score using the 18 F-FDG PET/CT radiomics of the primary tumor was the independent prognostic factor for predicting OS in patients with resectable PDAC and may be helpful in determining therapeutic and follow-up plans for these patients.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the latest on diagnosis, molecular profiling, and systemic treatments.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the United States and is expected to be ranked second in the next 10 years due to poor prognosis and a rising incidence. Distant metastatic PDAC is associated with the worst prognosis among the different phases of PDAC. The diagnostic options for PDAC are convenient and available for staging, tumor response evaluation, and management of resectable or borderline resectable PDAC. However, imaging is crucial in PDAC diagnosis, monitoring, resectability appraisal, and response evaluation. The advancement of medical technologies is evolving, hence the use of imaging in PDAC treatment options has grown as well as the utilization of ctDNA as a tumor marker. Treatment options for metastatic PDAC are minimal with the primary goal of therapy limited to symptom relief or palliation, especially in patients with low functional capacity at the point of diagnosis. Molecular profiling has shown promising potential solutions that would push the treatment boundaries for patients with PDAC. In this review, we will discuss the latest updates from evidence-based guidelines regarding diagnosis, therapy response evaluation, prognosis, and surveillance, as well as illustrating novel therapies that have been recently investigated for PDAC, in addition to discussing the molecular profiling advances in PDAC.

Risk Factors for Early Recurrence after Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Risk Factors for Early Recurrence after Upfront Surgery for Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Prediction of Isolated Local Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Nationwide Study

BackgroundDistinguishing postoperative fibrosis from isolated local recurrence (ILR) after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is challenging. A prognostic model that helps to identify patients at risk of ILR can assist clinicians when evaluating patients’ postoperative imaging. This nationwide study aimed to develop a clinically applicable prognostic model for ILR after PDAC resection.Patients and MethodsAn observational cohort study was performed, including all patients who underwent PDAC resection in the Netherlands (2014–2019; NCT04605237). On the basis of recurrence location (ILR, systemic, or both), multivariable cause-specific Cox-proportional hazard analysis was conducted to identify predictors for ILR and presented as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A predictive model was developed using Akaike’s Information Criterion, and bootstrapped discrimination and calibration indices were assessed.ResultsAmong 1194/1693 patients (71%) with recurrence, 252 patients (21%) developed ILR. Independent predictors for ILR were resectability status (borderline versus resectable, HR 1.42; 95% CI 1.03–1.96; P = 0.03, and locally advanced versus resectable, HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.68–1.82; P = 0.66), tumor location (head versus body/tail, HR 1.50; 95% CI 1.00–2.25; P = 0.05), vascular resection (HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.41–2.45; P < 0.001), perineural invasion (HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.01–2.13; P = 0.02), number of positive lymph nodes (HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01–1.08; P = 0.02), and resection margin status (R1 < 1 mm versus R0 ≥ 1 mm, HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.25–2.14; P < 0.001). Moderate performance (concordance index 0.66) with adequate calibration (slope 0.99) was achieved.ConclusionsThis nationwide study identified factors predictive of ILR after PDAC resection. Our prognostic model, available through www.pancreascalculator.com, can be utilized to identify patients with a higher a priori risk of developing ILR, providing important information in patient evaluation and prognostication.

Preoperative Prediction of Long-Term Survival After Surgery in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

BackgroundAlthough some clinical trials have demonstrated the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its optimal candidate has not been clarified. This study aimed to detect predictive prognostic factors for resectable PDAC patients who underwent upfront surgery and identify patient cohorts with long-term survival without neoadjuvant therapy.Patients and MethodsA total of 232 patients with resectable PDAC who underwent upfront surgery between January 2008 and December 2019 were evaluated.ResultsThe median overall survival (OS) time and 5-year OS rate of resectable PDAC with upfront surgery was 31.5 months and 33.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses identified tumor diameter in computed tomography (CT) ≤ 19 mm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, p < 0.001], span-1 within the normal range (HR 0.54, p = 0.023), prognostic nutritional index (PNI) ≥ 44.31 (HR 0.51, p < 0.001), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) ≥ 3.79 (HR 0.51, p < 0.001) as prognostic factors that influence favorable prognoses after upfront surgery. According to the prognostic prediction model based on these four factors, patients with four favorable prognostic factors had a better prognosis with a 5-year OS rate of 82.4% compared to others (p < 0.001). These patients had a high R0 resection rate and a low frequency of tumor recurrence after upfront surgery.ConclusionsWe identified patients with long-term survival after upfront surgery by prognostic prediction model consisting of tumor diameter in CT, span-1, PNI, and LMR. Evaluation of anatomical, biological, nutritional, and inflammatory factors may be valuable to introduce an optimal treatment strategy for resectable PDAC.