Rescue Morphine Research Articles

Comparison of intra and postoperative analgesia efficacy of intraperitoneal levobupivacaine alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy; a randomized, prospective, blinded, clinical trial

This study aimed to compare the analgesic and cardiopulmonary effects of levobupivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine, in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. In this prospective, randomized, and blinded clinical trial, 24 healthy cats were recruited. Animals received either saline (S group; 2 mL NaCl), levobupivacaine alone (Lev; 0.35 mg/kg), or levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine (LevDex group; 0.004 mg/kg), which was infiltrated intraoperatively into the subcutaneous tissue at various incision sites, including the right and left ovarian pedicles and the caudal aspect of the uterine body. Intraoperative analgesia was evaluated using a cumulative pain scale, while postoperative analgesia was assessed at various time points: before surgery (Tb), and at 0 (T0), 1 (T1h), 2 (T2h), 4 (T4h), 8 (T8h), 12 (T12h), and 24 (T24h) hours after the procedure, using the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale (MCPS). Significant decreases in heart rate, respiratory rate, and mean arterial pressure were observed in LevDex group as compared to S and Lev groups (p < 0.05). The S group required significantly more rescue morphine doses than the LevDex group (p = 0.029), but the difference was not significant when compared to the Lev group (p = 0.123). At T1h and T2h, the S group had significantly higher MCPS scores than both the Lev and LevDex groups (p = 0.029). However, at T8h, no significant difference was found between the S and LevDex groups (p = 0.741). While adding dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine may slightly prolong postoperative analgesia, this combination does not provide significant additional benefit over levobupivacaine alone in terms of response to surgical stimulation.

Enhancing analgesia in acute renal colic pain: a randomized controlled trial of gabapentin adjunct to ketorolac-based regimen.

Renal colic is characterized by severe pain that is highly disabling. Gabapentin, an antiepileptic medication, is often recommended as a first-line therapy for neuropathic pain. However, its effectiveness in managing somatic pain, which is defined as the result of activity by pain receptors in the deep tissues, such as renal colic pain, is not as well-established. A phase 3 randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the adjuvant analgesic effects of gabapentin on acute renal colic pain. Eligible patients participated in the study via random allocation to the control or gabapentin groups using the block randomization method. All patients received a shared regimen of ketorolac and rescue morphine as the conventional analgesic treatment for renal colic pain. Gabapentin was added as an adjuvant analgesic for the gabapentin group. A total of 63 individuals with an average age of 41.35 ± 13.08, were enrolled and completed the study. At the time of admission, there were no significant differences between the baseline characteristics of two groups, with exception of weight. The gabapentin group showed a significantly higher percentage of patients with pain severity of less than 5 after 60 and 90 min, as well as a significantly lower percentage of morphine rescue requirement and total morphine intake (mg) and mg/kg. In cases of acute renal colic, gabapentin significantly decreases both the amount of morphine required and the degree of pain, indicating that it may be a useful adjutant to standard analgesic regimens. Treatment regimens that include gabapentin may help individuals manage their pain and become less reliant on opioids. https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/56066, identifier: IRCT20200322046833N2.

Efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide, a rapid-acting meloxicam formulation, for analgesia after orthopaedic surgery under general anaesthesia: a randomized controlled trial.

Postoperative pain management is one of the most challenging treatments after orthopaedic surgery, and improved medical treatment options are urgently needed. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4-hydroxy-2-methyl-N-(5-methyl-2-thiazolyl)-2H-1, 2-benzothiazin-3-carboxamide 1,1-dioxide (QP001) for moderate to severe pain following orthopaedic surgery. This randomized clinical trial enlisted patients experiencing moderate to severe pain following orthopaedic surgery in 20 hospitals in China. We allocated randomly 132 participants to receive 30mg QP001 and 66 participants to receive 0.9% saline pre-surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was the total morphine consumption within 24h. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 group, versus placebo group, was significantly lower over the following 24h [12.53 (10.51) vs. 26.13 (13.98), P < 0.001]. The total morphine consumption in the QP001 group, versus placebo group, was also significantly decreased over the following 48h (P < 0.001). The QP001 group, versus placebo, showed a significant decrease in the effective pressing times of the analgesic pump, morphine relief analgesia ratio over the 24h and 48h periods and the area under the curve for pain intensity-time as well as a significant prolonged in the time of first pressing the analgesic pump and the time of first morphine rescue analgesia (P < 0.001). The QP001 groups, versus placebo, show no significant difference in adverse events, but the incidence of adverse drug reactions decreased (59.4% vs. 75.8%, P = 0.023). QP001 provides analgesia and reduces opioid consumption in patients with moderate to severe pain after orthopaedic surgery, with a favorable safety profile.

Phenobarbital as an adjunctive agent for sedation in pediatric intensive care unit patients: A single-center, retrospective study from Colorado

Abstract Background: Pediatric patients require pharmacological management of pain and agitation associated with mechanical ventilation. Pain and agitation may be refractory to opioids and alpha-2 agonists, prompting the use of adjunctive analgesics and sedatives with alternative mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of phenobarbital as an adjunctive agent for refractory agitation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Subjects and Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review at a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at a pediatric academic medical center in America between 2016 and 2021. Children aged 2 months to 18 years old were admitted to the PICU were mechanically ventilated and received phenobarbital for adjunct sedation. Sixty-three patients had phenobarbital dosing data evaluated, and the 38 patients who were not receiving continuous neuromuscular blockade were included in the primary and secondary outcome analysis of time within the goal sedation score. Descriptive statistics was used to assess baseline characteristics and the primary outcome. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate secondary outcomes. Results: Patients spent significantly more time within the goal sedation score range after phenobarbital compared to before phenobarbital. The median number of rescue sedative boluses, morphine equivalents (MEs), and benzodiazepine equivalents (BZDE) significantly decreased 2 days after the first phenobarbital dose compared to the 2 days before the first phenobarbital dose. Conclusions: The use of phenobarbital as an adjunct sedative was associated with a statistically significant increase in time spent in the goal sedation score range and decrease in ME, BZDE, and concomitant sedative boluses.

Sedation and analgesia in the trauma intensive care unit of Inkosi Albert Luthuli Central Hospital – the effect of anti-retroviral therapy: A retrospective chart analysis

PurposeAdequate access to antiretrovirals (ARV) has improved the longevity and quality of life of people living with the human immunodeficiency virus(HIV). Antiretrovirals are known to cause multiple drug–drug interactions. It was noted clinically that patients on ARVs appeared to be more difficult to sedate. This begs the question of the clinical impact of these drug interactions, should clinicians adjust sedative dosages when managing patients on ARVs? This study aimed to investigate the presence of and measure the differences in sedation and analgesic utilisation between polytrauma patients on ARVs and those not on ARVs.MethodsThis retrospective observational chart review included consecutive adult polytrauma patients admitted to the Trauma ICU IALCH between January 2016 and December 2019. HIV status and ARV use was documented. The total sedation per drug utilised at 24, 48 and 72-hour interval was calculated and tabulated accordingly. Drug utilisation was compared to ARV status.ResultsA total of 216 adult polytrauma patients were included in the study. A total of 44 patients were HIV positive and 172 were HIV negative. Of the HIV positive patients 41 (93.2%) were on ARVs. Multiple comparisons were confirmed, however the primary analysis compared HIV negative patients with HIV positive patients on ARV. Total morphine, ketamine, midazolam and propofol doses were all numerically greater in patients on ARVs, although none of these reached statistical significance. The use of morphine rescue boluses during the first 72 h of ICU admission and the doses of ketamine and propofol on ICU day 3 were significantly greater in those on ARVs.ConclusionThe data analysis showed that patients on ARVs required higher doses of some analgesia and sedation in ICU and lower doses of midazolam. This needs to be considered when sedating patients in a setting with a high HIV prevalence.

Comparative Study between Ultrasound Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block versus Thoracic Epidural as Postoperative Pain Management in Modified Radical Mastectomy

Abstract Background Surgery is one of the mainstays of treatment of breast cancer, and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is one of the standard treatments for multi-centric disease or tumors with extensive coexistent ductal carcinoma in situ, where achieving a clear surgical margin becomes difficult with a segmental mastectomy. Aim of the Work to compare between Serratus Anterior plane block and thoracic epidural as efficacy of postoperative analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy. Patients and Methods This study was prospective controlled single blinded randomized clinical study, carried out in Ain Shams University hospitals, Cairo, Egypt over a period of 6 months. The study included adult female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy was randomly assigned into two equal groups by computer generated: Group A: Included 15 patients received general anaesthesia preceded by Thoracic Epidural 9 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine at T4-T5 level. Group B: Included 15patients received general anaesthesia followed by SAP block using only bupivacaine 0.25% (safety dose 3 mg /kg). Results The haemodynamic data including heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure show a significant decrease in SAP group less than the TE group. The pain scale (VAS) showed a significant decrease in SAP group less than the TE group. The total opioids consumption was significantly less in SAP than TE group. The first rescue morphine analgesia (min.) was significantly higher in SAP group more than TE group. Conclusion The SAP was effective and safe technique which provides better pain relief compared with the TE and reduced post-operative opioid consumption. Also, SAP was effective analgesic technique showing greater hemodynamics stability and less stress response to surgery compared with TE.

Oral Clonidine-Based Strategy to Reduce Opiate Use During Cooling for Neonatal Encephalopathy: An Observational Study

To determine whether an enteral, clonidine-based sedation strategy (CLON) during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy would decrease opiate use while maintaining similar short-term safety and efficacy profiles to a morphine-based strategy (MOR). This was a single-center, observational study conducted at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit from January 1, 2017, to October 1, 2021. From April 13, 2020, to August 13, 2020, we transitioned from MOR to CLON. Thus, patients receiving TH for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy were grouped to MOR (before April 13, 2020) and CLON (after August 13, 2020). We calculated the total and rescue morphine milligram equivalent/kg (primary outcome) and frequency of hemodynamic changes (secondary outcome) for both groups. The MOR and CLON groups (74 and 25 neonates, respectively) had similar baseline characteristics and need for rescue sedative intravenous infusion (21.6% MOR and 20% CLON). Both morphine milligram equivalent/kg and need for rescue opiates (combined bolus and infusions) were greater in MOR than CLON (P<.001). As days in TH advanced, a lower percentage of patients receiving CLON needed rescue opiates (92% on day 1 to 68% on day 3). Patients receiving MOR received a greater cumulative dose of dopamine and more frequently required a second inotrope and hydrocortisone for hypotension. MOR had a lower respiratory rate during TH (P=.01 vs CLON). Our CLON protocol is noninferior to MOR, maintaining perceived effectiveness and hemodynamic safety, with an apparently reduced need for opiates and inotropes.

The efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of corticosteroids in multimodal analgesic cocktails in total knee arthroplasty-a historically controlled study.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common and effective procedure. Optimizing pain control and reducing postoperative discomfort are essential for patient satisfaction. No studies have examined the safety and efficacy of intra-articular corticosteroid injections following TKA. This study aims to examine the safety and efficacy of corticosteroids in intra-articular multimodal analgesic injections. This was a historically controlled study conducted at a single academic institution. Before May 2019, patients received an intra-articular cocktail injection without corticosteroids during surgery, referred to as the non-corticosteroid (NC) group. After June 2019, intraoperatively, patients received an intra-articular cocktail injection containing corticosteroids, referred to as the corticosteroid (C) group. Finally, 738 patients were evaluated, 370 in the C cohort and 368 in the NC cohort. The mean follow-up duration was 30.4 months for the C group and 48.4 months for the NC group. The mean VAS scores at rest on postoperative day (POD) 1 (2.35) and POD3 (3.88) were significantly lower in the C group than those in the NC group, which were 2.86 (POD1) and 5.26 (POD3) (p < 0.05). Walking pain in the C group (4.42) was also significantly lower than that (5.96) in the NC group on POD3 (p < 0.05). Patients in the C group had a significantly higher mean range of motion (ROM) (92.55) on POD3 than that (86.38) in the NC group. The mean time to straight leg raise for group C (2.77) was significantly shorter than that (3.61) for the NC group (p < 0.05). The C group also had significantly fewer rescue morphine (1.9) and metoclopramide (0.21) uses per patient than the NC group, which were 3.1 and 0.24, respectively. No significant differences in fever or vomiting rates between groups were found. Patients in neither group developed periprosthetic joint infections or skin necrosis. One patient in the C group suffered from wound dehiscence, and the wound healed well after debridement. No patient died or had a re-operation in either group. This pilot trial found that intra-articular injection of multimodal analgesia (including corticosteroids) reduced initial postoperative pain, increased ROM in the early postoperative days (up to POD3), and did not increase wound complications or infection rates in approximately 30 months of follow-up.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block for paediatric hip surgery: A randomised, double-blinded study.

Postoperative pain after hip surgeries in children could be classified as severe, requiring combined intra- and postoperative opioid analgesia with regional blocks. This study was carried out to investigate ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block for pain management after paediatric hip surgery. The primary objective was to assess the time of the first request for morphine rescue analgesia. In this randomised study, 56 children scheduled for elective unilateral hip surgery were distributed randomly to ESP and PENG groups. Intraoperative haemodynamics, fentanyl consumption, postoperative pain measurement, morphine consumption, time of first rescue analgesia, adverse effects and parents' satisfaction score were studied. The primary outcome was the time of the first request for morphine rescue analgesia. The Chi-square test, Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used, where applicable, to compare the groups. The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in Group ESP than in Group PENG (P < 0.001), with significantly higher postoperative morphine consumption in Group PENG than in Group ESP (P = 0.04). The pain scores of Group ESP were lower than those of Group PENG at 2 and 4 h postoperatively (P = 0.006 and P < 0.001, respectively). At 8 h postoperatively, the score was significantly higher in Group ESP than in Group PENG (P = 0.005). Other outcomes were comparable between both groups (P > 0.05). ESP and PENG could be both effective for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in paediatric hip surgeries, but the ESP block prolonged the time of first rescue analgesia more than the PENG block.

Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Nerve Block for Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: Our understanding of dexmedetomidine, as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery, is characterized by a current lack of compelling evidence, and it remains unknown whether the potential benefits of use outweigh the risks. The aim of the study was to evaluate the benefit and safety profiles of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Springer, medRxiv, and Scopus up to 17 May 2024. Risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes and standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes were quantified. Results: Twenty studies were identified. In breast cancer surgery, the use of dexmedetomidine reduced 24 h total morphine consumption (SMD = -1.99 [95% CI -3.01 to -0.98], p = 0.0001, I2 = 91%, random effects) and prolonged the requirement for morphine rescue analgesia (SMD = 2.98 [95% CI 0.01 to 5.95], p = 0.05, I2 = 98%, random effects). In abdominal cancer surgery, the dexmedetomidine group had lower total sufentanil consumption (SMD = -1.34 [95% CI -2.29 to -0.40], p = 0.005, I2 = 84%, random effects). Dexmedetomidine reduced the VAS score and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). No studies using dexmedetomidine reported serious adverse events. Conclusions: Using dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to nerve blocks in cancer surgery could lower the VAS pain score and prolong the regional anesthesia duration, which would lead to a decrease in total opioid consumption and possibly contribute to fewer PONV events. Furthermore, the reports of no serious adverse events indicate its good safety profile.

Intrathecal Analgesia Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery

Introduction: Thoracic surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain involving parietal, visceral, and projected components. Potent analgesia at rest and during movement over an extended period is crucial. Thoracic epidural analgesia is considered the gold standard, but intrathecal analgesia may represent a promising alternative. This study aimed to evaluate the ability of intrathecal analgesia to provide comparable pain relief to thoracic epidural analgesia for thoracic surgery. Methods: This prospective, descriptive study was conducted over 12 months. Adult patients undergoing elective thoracic surgery were included after obtaining written informed consent. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either thoracic epidural analgesia (Epidural group, n=40) with a loading dose of 10 ml 0.1% bupivacaine + 10 mcg sufentanil followed by continuous infusion, or intrathecal analgesia (Intrathecal group, n=23) with a single injection of 500 mcg morphine + 10 mcg sufentanil. Standardized general anesthesia and postoperative care protocols were applied. Primary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamics, postoperative pain scores (NRS 0-10), rescue analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results: The incidence of intraoperative hypotension was higher in the Epidural group (30% vs 8.7%, p=0.04). Postoperative pain scores were initially lower in the Intrathecal group, but the difference was not significant beyond 18 hours. Rescue morphine requirements were significantly higher in the Epidural group during the first 12 postoperative hours. Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the Intrathecal group (82.6% vs 62.5%, p=0.03). The incidence of nausea/vomiting and pruritus was significantly higher in the Intrathecal group. Discussion: Thoracic epidural analgesia was associated with a higher risk of intraoperative hypotension, likely due to the extended sympathetic blockade. Intrathecal analgesia provided superior early postoperative ....

Intermittent intravenous paracetamol versus continuous morphine in infants undergoing cardiothoracic surgery: a multi-center randomized controlled trial

BackgroundTo determine whether intermittent intravenous (IV) paracetamol as primary analgesic would significantly reduce morphine consumption in children aged 0–3 years after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.MethodsMulti-center, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial in four level-3 Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU) in the Netherlands and Belgium. Inclusion period; March 2016–July 2020. Children aged 0–3 years, undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were eligible. Patients were randomized to continuous morphine or intermittent IV paracetamol as primary analgesic after a loading dose of 100 mcg/kg morphine was administered at the end of surgery. Rescue morphine was given if numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores exceeded predetermined cutoff values. Primary outcome was median weight-adjusted cumulative morphine dose in mcg/kg in the first 48 h postoperative. For the comparison of the primary outcome between groups, the nonparametric Van Elteren test with stratification by center was used. For comparison of the proportion of patients with one or more NRS pain scores of 4 and higher between the two groups, a non-inferiority analysis was performed using a non-inferiority margin of 20%.ResultsIn total, 828 were screened and finally 208 patients were included; parents of 315 patients did not give consent and 305 were excluded for various reasons. Fourteen of the enrolled 208 children were withdrawn from the study before start of study medication leaving 194 patients for final analysis. One hundred and two patients received intermittent IV paracetamol, 106 received continuous morphine. The median weight-adjusted cumulative morphine consumption in the first 48 h postoperative in the IV paracetamol group was 5 times lower (79%) than that in the morphine group (median, 145.0 (IQR, 115.0–432.5) mcg/kg vs 692.6 (IQR, 532.7–856.1) mcg/kg; P < 0.001). The rescue morphine consumption was similar between the groups (p = 0.38). Non-inferiority of IV paracetamol administration in terms of NRS pain scores was proven; difference in proportion − 3.1% (95% CI − 16.6–10.3%).ConclusionsIn children aged 0–3 years undergoing cardiac surgery, use of intermittent IV paracetamol reduces the median weight-adjusted cumulative morphine consumption in the first 48 h after surgery by 79% with equal pain relief showing equipoise for IV paracetamol as primary analgesic.Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT05853263; EudraCT Number: 2015-001835-20.

Comparisons in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgical intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveThis study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). DesignRandomized, controlled, double-blinded study. SettingOperating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers. PatientsOne hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS. InterventionsThe anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery. MeasurementsThe primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes. Main resultsPatients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0–6) vs. 0 (0–6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay. ConclusionsBoth anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.

Effectiveness of subcutaneous morphine in the treatment of pain crises in cancer patients

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous morphine for managing pain crises resulting from various causes in cancer patients attended by the Pain Clinic in the immediate care area of the National Cancer Institute in Mexico City.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: This study was analytical, observational, retrospective, and descriptive. The oncology patients treated in the immediate care area for pain crises between August 1, 2020, and July 1, 2023, made up our study population. We documented the management of pain crises for patients who needed subcutaneous morphine treatment.&#x0D; Results: Considering a reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score &gt;30% as effective and a reduction &lt;30% as ineffective, 566 patients didn’t require an additional dose of subcutaneous morphine to control the pain crisis; 11 patients reported a decrease of &lt;30%. A total of 24 patients needed a second rescue. Among this group, only 5 responded well to the second morphine rescue; in the remaining 19 patients, the rescue was deemed ineffective if the NRS decreased by at least 30%. Only 5 individuals experienced moderate pain, and only one patient reported severe pain. The variables were compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test with significance &lt;0.05. Consequently, it may be said that there is a statistically significant difference between the first and subsequent NRS values obtained.&#x0D; Conclusion: For oncology patients treated by the Pain Clinic in the immediate care section of the National Cancer Institute in Mexico City, subcutaneous morphine is beneficial in managing pain crises of different origins.&#x0D; Keywords: Morphine, Subcutaneous Pain crises, Efficacy, Numeric rating scale

Preventive analgesia with oral tramadol and pregabalin for post-operative pain in breast surgical patients

Background &amp; objective: Preventive analgesia is implied before the actual surgical insult occurs and it is aimed to reduce the neuro-humoral changes associated with surgical induced pain. Different methods have been used by the anesthesiologists for this purpose. We studied the effect of pre-emptive oral tramadol 50 mg and pregabalin 100 mg on post-operative pain, the requirement of rescue analgesics and the stay in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) in breast cancer surgery patients. Methodology: A randomized double blinded, placebo-controlled trial, was conducted in the Department of Anesthesia, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore (Pakistan) after ethical approval by the hospital Scientific Review Committee and Institutional Review Board. Atotal of 30 patients, undergoing breast cancer surgery, were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Group A (study group) patients were given tramadol 50 mg and pregabalin 100 mg orally, and Group B (control group) received two soda mint tablets orally 30 min prior to induction of anesthesia. Standard monitoring was done and routine general anesthesia was administered with intubation. After recovery, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and time to rescue analgesia, total morphine consumption, were recorded. Data was analyzed using SPSS v.20. P &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The mean ages in Group A and B were 36.67 ± 9.50 y and 41.80 ± 12.43 y (P = 0.236). The differences in intra-operative morphine and rescue morphine use in both groups were not significant (P = 0.139 and 0.293, The rescue analgesic use and VAS scores in PACU were significantly different in both groups (P = 0.005 and P = 0.022, respectively). Total PACU stay in Group A was 79.33 ± 26.31 min and in Group B was 96.67 ± 34.98 min (P = 0.281). Tramadol use in the ward was not statistically equivalent (P = 0.300). Mean post-operative rescue morphine was 0.2 ± 0.775 mg/kg in control group as compared to placebo group was 1.4 ± 1.682 mg/kg, which was statistically significant (P = 0.02). VAS scores in PACU in both groups showed statistically differences, e.g., 1.33 ± 1.1 vs 2.70 ± 1.60 (P = 0.01). PACU stay time was also higher in the control group. Conclusion: The use of pre-emptive analgesia with oral tramadol 50 mg and pregabalin 100 mg 30 min before the surgery can reduce the requirement of peri operative opioid use, achieve better pain control and early recovery. Abbreviations: BMI- Basal Metabolic Rate; PACU- Post-Anesthesia Care Unit; PONV- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; VAS- Visual Analog Scale Key words: Analgesia, Preventive; Cancer Surgery; Opioids; Post-Anesthesia Care Unit; Pregabalin; Tramadol Citation: Usman A, Mehdi SR, Khan AA. Preventive analgesia with oral tramadol and pregabalin for post-operative pain in breast surgical patients. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(1):81−84; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i1.2374 Received: November 17, 2021; Reviewed: September 24, 2022; Accepted: July 06, 2023

The effect of adding dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Many strategies are available to prevent spinal-induced hypotension in cesarean section, especially the use of a low dose of spinal anesthesia combined with adjuvants. This study investigated the effect of adding either dexmedetomidine or dexamethasone to the intrathecal bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture on the postoperative analgesia duration, after elective cesarean section. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted on 90 full-term parturients undergoing elective cesarean section, who were randomly distributed into three groups. They all received spinal anesthesia with the bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture (2.5 ml), in addition to 0.5 ml normal saline (control group), 5 μg dexmedetomidine dissolved in 0.5 ml normal saline (dexmedetomidine group), or 2 mg dexamethasone (dexamethasone group). The time to the first request of morphine rescue analgesia was recorded, in addition to the total dose of morphine consumed in the first 24 h after surgery, the postoperative numerical rating score (NRS), and maternal and fetal outcomes. As compared to the control group and the dexamethasone group, the use of dexmedetomidine as an additive to the bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture significantly prolonged the time to the first request of rescue analgesia, decreased postoperative morphine consumption, and decreased the pain score 4 and 6 h after surgery. There was an insignificant difference between the control and dexamethasone groups. The use of dexmedetomidine as an additive to bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section prolonged the postoperative analgesia and decreased the postoperative opioid consumption in comparison to the addition of dexamethasone or normal saline.

Ultrasound-guided dexmedetomidine combination with modified high fascia iliaca compartment block for arthroscopic knee surgery: what is the optimal dose of dexmedetomidine?

BackgroundTotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common orthopedic procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Although effective in relieving pain and improving function, postoperative pain is still a common and distressing problem for many patients. This study aims to investigate efficacy of combined administration of dexmedetomidine and modified high fascia iliaca compartment block (H-FICB) in managing acute and chronic pain after TKA, as well as to identify the optimal dosage of dexmedetomidine.MethodsA double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing TKA. A total of 96 patients undergoing TKA were randomly assigned to one of three groups, were treated with different doses of dexmedetomidine All groups received H-FIB. Pain scores, opioid consumption, side effects, and quality of life were recorded 48 h postoperatively.ResultsThe intraoperative consumption of remifentanil and propofol in Group Db was significantly reduced compared with that in Group D0 and Da (P < 0.05). Compared with D0 and Da group, Db group had the lowest number of rescue analgesia, analgesia time and morphine accumulative dosage 48 h after operation (P < 0.05). The Db group had the lowest scores on the numerical rating scale at rest (P < 0.05) and during movement (P < 0.01), followed by the Da group and then the D0 group. Additionally, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was significantly reduced in the Db group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the Db group had the lowest incidence of chronic pain (P < 0.05).DiscussionIn comparison to the other two groups, the administration of combined dexmedetomidine and H-FIB resulted in a significant reduction in pain scores, opioid consumption, and side effects. The optimal dosage of dexmedetomidine was determined to be 1 μg/kg, which provided the most favorable pain relief with minimal adverse effects.

Analgesic Effect of Addition of Pectointercostal Block to Serratus Anterior Plane Block in Breast Surgeries: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is an efficient perioperative analgesic modality for breast surgeries. SAPB does not block the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves; thus, it does not provide adequate analgesia for the parasternal region and the medial side of the breast. A new parasternal block, the pectointercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) has been developed to overcome this issue. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to evaluate the perioperative analgesic effect of using PIFB in addition to SAPB. The primary outcome was to evaluate the postoperative pain score. The secondary outcomes were to assess perioperative opioid requirements, hemodynamic stability, and the satisfaction of the patient and surgeon. STUDY DESIGN: The current study was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled study. The current study was registered at the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202001789968542) and was designed after obtaining ethical institutional approval (Institutional Review Board No 00012098, Federalwide Assurance No 00018699). SETTING: The study involved 60 women between 21 and 69 years old with breast cancer who were scheduled for modified radical mastectomy or conservative breast surgeries in a university hospital. METHODS: After verbal and informed written consent, the patients were allocated to Group 1, which received SAPB, and Group 2, which received SAPB with PIFB. We assessed the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), perioperative opioid requirements, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, rescue analgesia, and complications. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were surveyed using a questionnaire where one is very dissatisfied and 5 is very satisfied. RESULTS: Intraoperative mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and heart rate were significantly lower in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB). The number of patients who needed intraoperative fentanyl was also significantly lower in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB) (P value = 0.010). Postoperative VAS showed no significant difference in both groups. The number of patients who needed postoperative rescue morphine, time for the first rescue analgesia, first morphine dose (mg), and total opioid consumption were also comparable for both groups. Patient satisfaction and surgeon satisfaction were comparable for both groups (P values = 1.000 and 0.496, respectively). LIMITATIONS: VAS was not recorded during movements and no follow-up was done to detect the potential effect on chronic postmastectomy pain. Moreover, after reviewing the literature, there was no efficient data about adding PIFB with different regional blocks for breast surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients who needed intraoperative fentanyl, as well as the MABP and heart rate were significantly lower in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB). Postoperative vital signs, VAS, postoperative analgesic requirements, and opioid consumption were comparable for both groups. Patient satisfaction was comparable for both groups, while surgeon satisfaction was higher in Group 2 (SAPB+PIFB) but statistically not significant. KEY WORDS: Pectointercostal, fascial plane block, serratus anterior plane block, breast surgery, regional analgesia for mastectomy

Comparison of Adding Magnesium Sulphate to Bupivacaine with Plain Bupivacaine in Ultrasound Guided Pectoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Modified Radical Mastectomy

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, and its incidence continues to increase. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is one of the standard treatments for multi-centric disease or tumors with extensive coexistent ductal carcinoma in situ. Aim of the Study To elaborate the analgesic efficiency and safety of pectoral nerve block by adding magnesium sulphate to bupivacaine as an adjuvant versus bupivacaine as a sole agent in cases of modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Patients and Methods This is a Prospective double – blinded randomized controlled study was conducted in the operating theatres of Ain Shams University Hospitals. It included Female patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy. Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study divided into 12 patients in each group. Results There was a statistically significant difference between 2 groups according to post-operative visual analogue scale. It was lower in consumption in group B than in group A. Also a statistically significant difference between group A and group B according to first time of rescue morphine consumption was found, it was longer time to need postoperative morphine consumption in group B than in group A And we found the addition of 300 mg of magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in an ultrasound-guided Pectoral Nerve Block significantly prolong the duration of the analgesia, and reduce the VAS score without significant side effects after Modified Radical Mastectomy under general anesthesia. Conclusion The addition of 300 mg of magnesium sulfate to bupivacaine in an ultrasound-guided Pectoral Nerve Block significantly prolong the duration of the analgesia, and reduce the VAS score without significant side effects after Modified Radical Mastectomy under general anesthesia

Knowledge, Perception and Barriers to Cancer Pain Management among Doctors in Malaysia.

Pain remains common in people living with advanced cancer and is often inadequately managed. This study was designed to assess knowledge, perceptions and barriers to morphine use in cancer pain management among doctors in Malaysia. Doctors from multiple disciplines in a general hospital were invited to complete a 39-item self-reported questionnaire between November 2020 and December 2020. Each question was based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree). 'Agree' and 'strongly agree' were considered correct or positive responses, except for nine questions worded in the opposite direction. Associations between variables were confirmed using Pearson's chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. Most respondents were house officers (206/321; 64.2%) with less than two years of service, followed by medical officers (68/321; 21.2%) and specialists (47/321; 14.6%). Only 7.2% of the respondents had received formal palliative care training before the study. Of the respondents, 73.5% were aware of the World Health Organization (WHO) analgaesic ladder, 60.7% were correct on oral morphine as the first line for moderate to severe cancer pain treatment and 91.9% knew the need to add rescue morphine for breakthrough pain. Additionally, 34.0% (P < 0.001) perceived morphine use caused addiction, 57.9% (n = 186) expressed fear of respiratory depression and 18.3% of medical officers and specialists perceived limited access and a maximum dose to prescribe. There was a significant difference in knowledge and perception between junior doctors and senior clinicians. The majority strongly agreed and agreed that there were inadequate training opportunities in cancer pain management. Inconsistent knowledge and negative perceptions of cancer pain management among doctors were demonstrated in this study.