Repeat Coronary Revascularization Research Articles

Comparison of Outcomes Between ST-Segment Elevation and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarctions Based on Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Background: This study was conducted to address the lack of reports comparing the clinical outcomes of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and STEMI based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: A total of 9854 patients from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health dataset were classified into three LVEF categories: heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (EF) (HFrEF, n = 1250), HF with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF, n = 2383), and HF with preserved EF (HFpEF, n = 6221). Each group was further divided into NSTEMI and STEMI groups. The primary clinical outcome was the incidence of patient-oriented composite outcomes, defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat coronary revascularization, hospitalization for HF, and stroke. Results: Following adjustment, in-hospital mortality rates were comparable between the NSTEMI and STEMI groups in the HFrEF and HFmrEF groups. However, 3-year mortality rates were higher in the NSTEMI group. In contrast, in the HFpEF group, the STEMI group had higher rates of in-hospital all-cause death (p = 0.001) and cardiac death (p < 0.001) compared to the NSTEMI group, which was associated with increased 3-year all-cause death (p = 0.026) and cardiac death (p < 0.001) in the STEMI group. When in-hospital mortality was excluded, no difference in 3-year mortality rates was observed between the NSTEMI and STEMI groups in the HFpEF group. Conclusions: In-hospital mortality and 3-year outcomes varied across LVEF groups. Therefore, comparing NSTEMI and STEMI based on LVEF provides valuable insights into the differences in patient outcomes.

Effect of diabetes mellitus on 3-year outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a significant factor in increased mortality rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but research on its impact on the long-term outcomes in patients with MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is limited. Thus, a comparison of the 3-year clinical outcomes between the DM and non-DM groups among patients with MINOCA was undertaken. From the Korea AMI Registry-National Institute of Health dataset, 10,774 AMI patients were enrolled. After applying the exclusion criteria, 379 patients with MINOCA were included. The primary clinical outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACCE. The adjusted hazard ratios for 3-year MACCE (2.287, p = 0.010), all-cause death (2.845, p = 0.004), and non-cardiac death (non-CD, 3.914, p = 0.008) were higher in the DM group than in the non-DM group. It is speculated that the higher non-CD rate in the MINOCA group is attributable to a higher proportion of patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI in the total study population. The CD, recurrent MI, revascularization, and stroke rates were similar between the DM and non-DM groups. DM, advanced age, cardiopulmonary resuscitation on admission, and non-use of statin medications were significant predictors of MACCE. In this study involving patients with MINOCA, the DM group exhibited a higher 3-year mortality rate than the non-DM group. Thus, DM demonstrated a hazardous effect even in patients with MINOCA.

Effect of delayed hospitalization on 3-year clinical outcomes according to renal function in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

We evaluated the effect of delayed hospitalization (symptom-to-door time [STD] ≥ 24 h) on 3-year clinical outcomes according to renal function in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. A total of 4513 patients with NSTEMI were classified into chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 60 mL/min/1.73 m², n = 1118) and non-CKD (eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m², n = 3395) groups. They were further sub-classified into groups with (STD ≥ 24 h) and without (STD < 24 h) delayed hospitalization. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, any repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis (ST). After multivariable-adjusted and propensity score analyses, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes were similar in patients with or without delayed hospitalization in both CKD and non-CKD groups. However, in both the STD < 24 h and STD ≥ 24 h groups, MACCE (p < 0.001 and p < 0.006, respectively) and mortality rates were significantly higher in the CKD group than in the non-CKD group. However, ST rates were similar between the CKD and non-CKD groups and between the STD < 24 h and STD ≥ 24 h groups. Chronic kidney disease appears to be a much more important determinant of MACCE and mortality rates than STD in patients with NSTEMI.

Metabolic score for insulin resistance predicts major adverse cardiovascular event in premature coronary artery disease.

The Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance (METS-IR) index serves as a simple surrogate marker for insulin resistance (IR) and is associated with the presence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the prognostic significance of METS-IR in patients with premature CAD remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of METS-IR in premature CAD. This retrospective study included 582 patients diagnosed with premature CAD between December 2012 and July 2019. The median follow-up duration was 63 months (interquartile range, 44-81 months). The primary endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), repeat coronary artery revascularization, and non-fatal stroke. Patients with MACE had significantly higher METS-IR levels than those without MACE (44.88±8.11 vs. 41.68±6.87, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on METS-IR tertiles demonstrated a statistically significant difference (log-rank test, p<0.001). In the fully adjusted model, the Hazard Ratio (95% CI) for MACE was 1.41 (1.16-1.72) per SD increase in METS-IR, and the P for trend based on METS-IR tertiles was 0.001 for MACE. Time-dependent Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis of METS-IR yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.74 at 2 years, 0.69 at 4 years, and 0.63 at 6 years. METS-IR serves as a reliable prognostic predictor of MACE in patients with premature CAD. Therefore, METS-IR may be considered a novel, cost-effective, and dependable indicator for risk stratification and early intervention in premature CAD.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Disease With and Without Diabetes: Findings From a Pooled Analysis of 4 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Diabetes may be associated with differential outcomes in patients undergoing left main coronary revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this study was to investigate outcomes in patients with left main disease with and without diabetes randomized to PCI versus CABG. Individual patient data were pooled from 4 trials (SYNTAX [Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery], PRECOMBAT [Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease], NOBLE [Nordic-Baltic-British Left Main Revascularisation Study], and EXCEL [Evaluation of XIENCE Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Effectiveness of Left Main Revascularization]) that randomized patients with left main disease to PCI or CABG. Patients were considered suitable for either approach. Patients were categorized by diabetes status. Kaplan-Meier event rates, Cox model hazard ratios, and interactions were assessed. Among 4393 patients, 1104 (25.1%) had diabetes. Patients with diabetes experienced higher rates of 5-year death (158/1104 [Kaplan-Meier rate, 14.7%] versus 297/3289 [9.3%]; P<0.001), spontaneous myocardial infarction (MI; 67/1104 [6.7%] versus 114/3289 [3.7%]; P<0.001), and repeat revascularization (189/1104 [18.5%] versus 410/3289 [13.2%]; P<0.001). Rates of all-cause mortality did not differ after PCI versus CABG in those with (84/563 [15.3%] versus 74/541 [14.1%]; hazard ratio, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.82-1.52]) or without (155/1634 [9.7%] versus 142/1655 [8.9%]; hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.36; PintHR=0.87) diabetes. Rates of stroke within 1 year were lower with PCI versus CABG in the entire population, with no heterogeneity based on diabetes status (PintHR=0.51). The 5-year rates of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization were higher after PCI regardless of diabetes status (spontaneous MI: 45/563 [8.9%] versus 22/541 [4.4%] in diabetes and 82/1634 [5.3%] versus 32/1655 [2.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.47; repeat revascularization: 127/563 [24.5%] versus 62/541 [12.4%] in diabetes and 254/1634 [16.3%] versus 156/1655 [10.1%] in no diabetes, PintHR=0.18). For spontaneous MI and repeat revascularization, there were greater absolute risk differences beyond 1 year in patients with diabetes (4.9% and 9.9%) compared with those without (2.1% and 4.3%; PintARD=0.047 and 0.016). In patients with left main disease considered equally suitable for PCI or CABG and with largely low to intermediate SYNTAX scores, diabetes was associated with higher rates of death and cardiovascular events through 5 years. Compared with CABG, PCI resulted in no difference in the risk of death and a lower risk of early stroke regardless of diabetes status, and a higher risk of spontaneous MI and repeat coronary revascularization, with larger late absolute excess risks in patients with diabetes. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT01205776, NCT0146651, NCT00422968, and NCT00114972.

Radial artery vs right internal mammary artery as a second conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting

To compare the clinical outcomes of radial artery (RA) grafts during CABG to those of right internal mammary artery (RIMA) grafts. This was a retrospective, single-institution cohort study of isolated CABG with multiple grafts between 2010-2022. To balance graft cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using a 1:1 match ratio. Long-term postoperative survival was compared among RA and RIMA groups. Similarly, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were compared among both cohorts, with MACCE comprising death, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization, and stroke. Kaplan-Meier estimation was performed for mortality, while cumulative incidence estimation was utilized for MACCE. A total of 8,774 patients underwent CABG. Of those, 1,674 (19.1%) patients who underwent multiarterial CABG were included in this analysis. 326 (19.5%) patients received RA grafts and 1,348 (80.5%) received RIMA grafts. PSM yielded a cohort of 323 RA patients and 323 RIMA patients. After matching, groups were well-balanced across all baseline variables. No significant differences were observed in immediate postoperative complications or long-term survival, with 5-year survival estimates of 89.5% for the RA group vs 90.1% for the RIMA group. There was a nonsignificant trend toward a higher incidence of MACCE at 5 years in the RA group compared to the RIMA group (31.3% in the RA group vs 24.1% in the RIMA group), especially after 1-year follow-up (21.6% in the RA group vs 15.1% in the RIMA group). Specifically, for RA patients, there were higher rates of repeat revascularization in the 5-year postoperative period (14.7% in the RA group vs 5.3% in the RIMA group), particularly in the territory revascularized by the RA during the index operation (45.7% in the RA group vs 10.3% in the RIMA group). Overall, RA and RIMA secondary conduits for CABG were associated with comparable immediate postoperative complications, 5-year MACCE, and 5-year survival after PSM. RA grafting was associated with significantly higher rates of repeat coronary revascularization at 5 years, specifically in the territory revascularized by the RA during the index operation.

Hospital discharge after uncomplicated ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: How early is safe?

Abstract Background International guidelines recommend that hospital discharge within 48–72h is appropriate in selected low-risk patients admitted for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). Objectives To assess the safety of hospital discharge after 24 hours of admission in patients with uncomplicated STEMI submitted to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Methods We conducted a single-centre retrospective study enrolling consecutive patients admitted for STEMI from 2016 to 2018 submitted to PPCI. We defined clinically uncomplicated STEMI (UMI) as the absence of cardiorespiratory arrest, mechanical complications, tachy- and bradyarrhythmias, heart failure (Killip class &amp;gt; 1 [HF]), reinfarction and types 2 or 3 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Additionally, we included the criterion of preserved left preserved ejection fraction (LVEF&amp;gt;50%). Patients referred for coronary surgery (CABG) were excluded. Cumulative rates of death and clinical events defining UMI were reported at days 1, 2, 3, and 4. Death, clinical events defining UMI or repeat coronary revascularization at 1-year were reported after days 1, 2, 3, and 4. Results A total of 356 patients submitted to PPCI were included, with 64±14 years, 73% male. Median in-hospital stay was 4 [3;7] days. Applying UMI criteria we identified 271 patients (76%) in day-1, 249 (70%) in day-2, 244 (69%) in day-3, and 240 (67%) patients in day 4. Using UMI criteria, discharge after day 1 would be associated with 2.0% of early clinical events, 1.6% after day-2, and 1% after day-3. Post-discharge 1-year incidence of death, clinical events defining UMI or repeat coronary revascularization was roughly similar after day-2 (Table). Adding LVEF&amp;gt;50% to UMI, we identified 176 patients (49%) in day-1, 168 (47%) in day-2, 165 (46%) in day-3 and 164 (46%) in day-4. Discharge after day 1 would be associated with 1.8% of early clinical events, 0.6% after day-2 and 0.6% after day-3. Post-discharge 1-year incidence of death, clinical events defining UMI or repeat coronary revascularization was similar after day-2. Conclusions In our cohort of patients with STEMI submitted to PPCI, clinically uncomplicated criteria identified 69% of patients eligible for safe discharge after day-3. The addition of preserved left ventricular ejection fraction criterion can anticipate a safe discharge after day-2 in almost 50% of patients.

Repeat coronary revascularization in high-risk patients treated with ticagrelor monotherapy after PCI: Insights from the randomized TWILIGHT trial

Abstract Background Repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains a major concern, even though its impact on mortality is limited. The effect of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) on this outcome is unclear. Aim To assess the impact of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. DAPT on repeat revascularization after PCI. Methods In the TWILIGHT trial, high-risk patients who were event-free and adherent to a ticagrelor-based DAPT for 3 months after PCI were randomized to ticagrelor plus aspirin or ticagrelor plus placebo for 12 additional months. In this post-hoc analysis, the primary endpoint was repeat revascularization due to recurrent or persistent symptomatic myocardial ischemia. Secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) (Figure). All endpoints were adjudicated and assessed at 12 months after randomization in the per-protocol population. Results Among 6,759 patients, ticagrelor monotherapy and ticagrelor plus aspirin were associated with a similar risk of repeat revascularization (7.1% vs 6.7%, HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.89-1.29), TLR, TVR and MACCE (Figure), while NACE was lower with ticagrelor monotherapy. Conclusion In high-risk patients undergoing PCI, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of ticagrelor plus aspirin was associated with similar rates of recurrent coronary revascularization and MACCE and a lower risk of NACE compared with continued DAPT.

Incidence and pattern of repeat coronary revascularizations in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel

Abstract Background The ISAR-REACT 5 randomized trial compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) managed invasively. Data are missing with regard to the effect of these antiplatelet agents on the repeat revascularization procedures. Purpose We sought to investigate the impact of ticagrelor and prasugrel on the incidence and pattern of repeat coronary revascularizations in patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods This post-hoc analysis of the ISAR-REACT 5 trial included all ACS patients who underwent PCI. Patients were divided into two groups as per assigned antiplatelet treatment. The primary outcome for this analysis was the incidence of repeat coronary revascularization (percutaneous or surgical) up to 12-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were target vessel revascularization (TVR) and non-target vessel revascularization (NTVR). We also studied whether repeat revascularization procedures were urgent in nature. Results Among 3,377 ACS patients, 1,676 were assigned to ticagrelor and 1,701 to prasugrel group before receiving PCI. Compared with prasugrel, the incidence of repeat coronary revascularization at 12 months was significantly higher in patients treated with ticagrelor (hazard ratio [HR]=1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.29), mostly attributable to significantly more NTVR (HR=1.15 [1.01-1.32]) in this latter group. There were numerically more urgent repeat revascularizations in patients receiving ticagrelor compared with prasugrel (HR=1.32 [1.00-1.75]), mostly due to urgent NTVR (HR=1.62 [1.09-2.41]). The risk of TVR was not significantly different between treatment groups (HR=1.04 [0.76-1.44]). Conclusions In patients with ACS treated with PCI, ticagrelor is associated with significantly more repeat coronary revascularizations compared to prasugrel after 12 months, predominantly in remote coronary vessels.

Abstract 15805: Elevated Lp(a) and Risk of Repeat Coronary Revascularization and Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Prior CABG

Introduction: Elevated Lp(a) is associated with atherosclerotic, thrombotic, and proinflammatory effects. In patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), graft failure and progression of native CAD are associated with adverse outcomes. We sought to evaluate the relationship between Lp(a) and adverse cardiovascular events in patients with prior CABG. Methods: We included all patients with prior CABG from a large, contemporary Lp(a) registry. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between repeat coronary revascularization (CR) - defined as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or repeat CABG - as well as incident MI or CV death, stratified by tertiles of Lp(a). Results: Among the 16,419 individuals in the cohort, 878 (5.3%) patients (23.4% women, median age 66) had CABG prior to their Lp(a) test date. Among those with prior CABG, 81.7% had hypertension, 87.9% had hyperlipidemia, and 42.1% had diabetes. Patients with prior CABG had higher Lp(a) levels (46.3 nmol/L [IQR 15.8-148]) than with those without prior CABG (35 nmol/L [IQR 13-111.7]). Over a median follow-up of 11.2 years, patients in the highest Lp(a) tertile [&gt;= 95 nmol/L] were more likely to undergo repeat CR (HR 1.86 (95% CI, 1.18-2.94), p=0.008) with PCI (n=83), repeat CABG (n=5), or both CABG and PCI (n=12). This association persisted when adjusted for age, sex, race, diabetes, and hypertension (HR 1.67 (95% CI,1.05-2.67). Additionally, patients in the highest Lp(a) tertile were more likely to experience CV death or MI (HR 1.56 (95% CI, 1.17-2.08); this increased risk persisted in adjusted analyses (HR 1.59 (95% CI,1.19-2.14) (see Figure 1 ). Conclusions: Among patients with prior CABG, elevated Lp(a) is associated with a higher risk of repeat coronary revascularization and adverse CV events. Future studies should focus on the potential role of Lp(a) lowering therapies for maintaining graft patency and reducing CV events.

The impact of sex differences on 3-year outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after successful stent implantation according to symptom-to-balloon time

BackgroundBecause no data are available, we compared the 3-year outcomes of patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) based on sex and symptom-to-balloon time (SBT). MethodsThis study included 4910 patients who were divided into two groups based on SBT: SBT <48 h (n = 3,293, 67.1%) and SBT ≥48 h (n = 1,617, 32.9%). The primary outcome was all-cause death during the 3-year follow-up period. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or repeat coronary revascularization. ResultsAfter adjustment, the in-hospital mortality rates for males and females in the SBT <48 h and SBT ≥48 h groups were similar. During a 3-year follow-up period, females in the SBT <48 h group had significantly higher rates of all-cause death (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.482; P = 0.006), cardiac death (CD, aHR, 1.617; P = 0.009), and MACE (aHR, 1.268; P = 0.024) than those males in the same groups. Females and males in the SBT ≥48 h group did not differ significantly in the primary and secondary outcomes. In males, the rates of all-cause death (P = 0.008) and CD (P = 0.024) were significantly higher in the SBT ≥48 h group than in the SBT <48 h group. ConclusionsThis study has identified a higher 3-year mortality rate in female patients with NSTEMI and SBT <48 h compared to their male counterparts. As such, a more preventive approach may be required to reduce mortality in these female patients.

Clinically Driven Revascularization in High-Risk Patients Treated With Ticagrelor Monotherapy After PCI: Insights from the Randomized TWILIGHT Trial

Repeat coronary revascularization is a common adverse event after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. This analysis aimed to assess the effects of ticagrelor monotherapy on repeat clinically driven revascularization (CDR). In the TWILIGHT (Ticagrelor With Aspirin or Alone in High-Risk Patients after Coronary Intervention) trial, after 3months of ticagrelor plus aspirin, high-risk patients were maintained on ticagrelor and randomly allocated to aspirin or placebo for 1year. The primary end point of this analysis was CDR within 12months after randomization. The key secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or CDR, and net adverse clinical events (NACEs), including the individual components of MACCEs and clinically relevant bleeding. The analysis was performed in the per-protocol population. CDR occurred in 473 of 7,039 patients and was associated with a significantly higher risk of subsequent all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (adjusted hazard ratios [HRs] 2.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82 to 4.67). Ticagrelor monotherapy was associated with a similar 12-month risk of CDR (7.1% vs 6.6%; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.30, p=0.363) and MACCEs (8.9% vs 8.6%; HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.22, p=0.619), and a lower risk of NACEs (12.2% vs 14.6%; HR 0.83 95% CI 0.73 to 0.94, p=0.004) than ticagrelor plus aspirin. In conclusion, among high-risk patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3months of ticagrelor-based dual antiplatelet therapy was associated with a similar risk of CDR and MACCEs and a decrease of NACEs (TWILIGHT: NCT02270242).

Combination of the triglyceride-glucose index and EuroSCORE II improves the prediction of long-term adverse outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

We aimed to investigate the independent and combined association of the triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index and EuroSCORE II with major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and examine whether the addition of the TyG index improves the predictive performance of the EuroSCORE II. This study included 1013 patients who underwent CABG. The primary endpoint was MACE, which was defined as the composite of all-cause death, repeat coronary artery revascularisation, non-fatal myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke. The patients were grouped by the TyG index and EuroSCORE II tertiles and the combination of these risk indicators. During the follow-up, 211 individuals developed MACE. Elevated levels of the TyG index and EuroSCORE II were associated with an increased risk of MACE. The hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 3.66 (2.34-5.73) in patients with the highest tertile of the TyG index and EuroSCORE II. Compared with the EuroSCORE II alone, combining the TyG index with EuroSCORE II achieved a better predictive performance [C-statistic increased 0.032, p<0.001; continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) (95% CI): 0.364 (0.215-0.514), p<0.001; integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) (95% CI): 0.015 (0.007-0.023), p<0.001, Akaike's information criteria (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) decreased, and the likelihood ratio test, p<0.001]. The TyG index and EuroSCORE II are independently associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, the TyG index is an important adjunct to the EuroSCORE II for improving risk stratification and guiding early intervention among post-CABG patients.

Effects of delayed hospitalization on the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with or without diabetes who had non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and underwent new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation.

Clinical outcomes after non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in patients with (symptom-to-door time [SDT] ≥ 24 h) or without (SDT < 24 h) delayed hospitalization among patients with or without diabetes were compared. From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health, a total of 4517 patients with NSTEMI who underwent new-generation drug-eluting stents implantation were recruited and they were classified into the diabetes mellitus (DM) and non-DM groups. These two groups were subdivided into groups with and without delayed hospitalization. The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was the occurrence of individual components of MACCE and stent thrombosis. Although after multivariable and propensity score-adjusted analyses in the DM group, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes between the SDT < 24 h and SDT ≥ 24 h groups were similar; in the non-DM group, all-cause (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively) and cardiac (p = 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) death rates were significantly higher in the SDT ≥ 24 h group than in the SDT < 24 h group. Our results suggested that there was no significant difference in prognosis between diabetic patients with and without delayed SDT, but delayed SDT was associated with poor prognosis in nondiabetic patients.

Sex Differences in Delayed Hospitalization in Patients with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation

We compared the effects of sex differences in delayed hospitalization (symptom-to-door time [SDT], ≥24 h) on major clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after new-generation drug-eluting stent implantation. A total of 4593 patients were classified into groups with (n = 1276) and without delayed hospitalization (SDT < 24 h, n = 3317). Thereafter, these two groups were subdivided into male and female groups. The primary clinical outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was stent thrombosis. After multivariable- and propensity score-adjusted analyses, in-hospital mortalities were similar between the male and female groups in both the SDT < 24 h and SDT ≥ 24 h groups. However, during a 3-year follow-up period, in the SDT < 24 h group, all-cause death (p = 0.013 and p = 0.005, respectively) and cardiac death (CD, p = 0.015 and p = 0.008, respectively) rates were significantly higher in the female group than those in the male group. This may be related to the lower all-cause death and CD rates (p = 0.022 and p = 0.012, respectively) in the SDT < 24 h group than in the SDT ≥ 24 h group among male patients. Other outcomes were similar between the male and female groups and between the SDT < 24 h and SDT ≥ 24 h groups. In this prospective cohort study, female patients showed higher 3-year mortality, especially in the SDT < 24 h, compared to male patients.

Impact of body mass index on repeat coronary revascularization rates in patients with LDL-C below 55 mg/dL and LDL-C below 70 mg/dL: a 42-month cohort study in Korea.

Previous studies revealed a linear relationship between body mass index (BMI) and repeat coronary revascularization rate in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, this relationship has not been demonstrated in Korean patients who meet old and new target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of Korean dyslipidemia guidelines. Therefore, we conducted this study to find out the effect of BMI on repeat coronary revascularization rate in patients with LDL-C <55 mg/dL and patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL. This cohort study was followed for 42 months in Daegu Catholic Medical Center, Korea. We included 429 patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL 1 year after PCI. We compared repeat revascularization rates using Kaplan-Meier survival curves between the normal weight group (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 23 kg/m2) and the pre-obesity and obesity group (23 kg/m2 ≤ BMI) in patients with LDL-C <55 mg/dL and patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL. During a follow-up period, there was no significant difference in repeat coronary revascularization-free survival between a group with LDL-C <55 mg/dL and a group with LDL-C <70 mg/dL (79.6% vs. 76.2%, P=0.32). In normal weight patients, LDL-C <55 mg/dL group showed higher repeat coronary revascularization-free survival than LDL-C <70 mg/dL group (89.3% vs. 77.1%, P=0.05). There was no significant difference in repeat revascularization-free survival between the normal weight group and the pre-obesity and obesity group in patients with LDL-C <70 mg/dL (77.1% vs. 75.7%, P=0.67). However, the normal weight group showed significantly higher repeat revascularization-free survival compared to the pre-obesity and obesity group in patients with LDL-C <55 mg/dL (89.3% vs. 74.3%, P=0.03). Normal body weight and LDL-C <55 mg/dL [hazard ratio (HR): 0.421, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.193-0.916, P=0.02] was the only independent predictor for repeat revascularization. In Korean PCI patients with normal body weight whose LDL-C level is less than 70 mg/dL, but more than 55 mg/dL, should be treated with more intensive therapy to lower LDL-C to less than 55 mg/dL. For obese patients who have succeeded in reducing LDL-C below 55 mg/dL, it seems that weight loss should be attempted to a normal body weight level.

Lipoprotein(a) in progressive coronary artery disease: beyond classical cardiovascular risk parameters

Abstract Introduction Classical primary preventive cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk algorithms, such as the Framingham risk score and the widely used QRISK score in the UK, predate large-scale deep-phenotyped biomedical research resources. There is therefore the opportunity to identify novel predictors. In addition, whilst CVD risk profiling is well studied in the context of primary prevention, there is a paucity of data examining risk in regard to secondary prevention. Purpose To identify independent predictors of repeat coronary artery revascularisation, following index coronary angioplasty. Methods The UK Biobank is a large prospective multicentre study which recruited over 500,000 participants in the UK aged 37–73 years at entry between 2006–2010. Data are derived from an array of physical measurements, self-reported measures and biological samples, together with longitudinal linkage to hospital inpatient records and death registries. Procedural codes were used to identify patients who had undergone first coronary angioplasty from 2006 onwards. Repeat revascularisation (RR) was defined as angioplasty or bypass grafting occurring at least 9 months after the index angioplasty, in order to preclude instances of staged revascularisation and in-stent restenosis. Data were censored at January 2021 or date of death as appropriate. Results A total of 12,853 participants underwent a first coronary angioplasty during the study period, with 1,394 (10.8%) requiring RR over a median follow-up of 6.5 years. The average age was 64 years in the RR cohort and 1117 (80%) were male. Univariate analyses confirmed a number of established associations with RR, including for example diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Median lipoprotein(a) concentrations were 27.6 vs. 30.3nmol/L in the RR group, p=0.066. Cox regression analyses (n=7,216) incorporating 21 biometric and clinical parameters demonstrated that lipoprotein(a) &amp;gt;80nmol/L was one of six independent predictors of time to RR (HR 1.24, p=0.006), independent of other lipids. The strength and significance of this association persisted when the number of covariates was reduced to include only other lipids and classical cardiovascular risk parameters. LDL, HDL, and triglyceride levels were not significant predictors in this model. Conclusions Lipoprotein(a) is identified as a major independent driver of RR. However current European Society of Cardiology guidance does not recommend measurement of Lipoprotein(a) in the context of progressive coronary artery disease. Furthermore, it is known that strategies such as lifestyle advice and statins – recommended in all patients with established coronary artery disease - do no reduce lipoprotein(a), whilst niacin and PCSK9 inhibitors do have a significant effect. Indications for lipoprotein(a) measurement must therefore be broadened, so that specific treatments to lower it can be instituted in order to reduce the burden of progressive coronary artery disease. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Herefordshire Heart Fund

Comparison of 3-Year Outcomes between Early and Delayed Invasive Strategies in Older and Younger Adults with Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.

We evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes of early invasive (EI) and delayed invasive (DI) strategies in older and younger adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing successful new-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation to reflect current real-world practice. Overall, 4513 patients with NSTEMI were recruited from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health and divided into two groups according to age: group A (age ≥ 65 years, n = 2253) and group B (age < 65 years, n = 2260). These two groups were further divided into two subgroups: group EI (A1 and B1) and DI (A2 and B2). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as all-cause death, recurrent MI (re-MI), any repeat coronary revascularization, or stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST). In both groups A and B, after multivariable-adjusted and propensity score-adjusted analyses, MACCE (group A, p = 0.137 and p = 0.255, respectively; group B, p = 0.171 and p = 0.135, respectively), all-cause death, cardiac death (CD), non-CD, re-MI, any repeat revascularization, stroke, and ST rates were similar between the EI and DI groups. When including only those with complex lesions, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the EI and DI groups. In the era of new-generation DESs, major clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the EI and DI strategies in both older and younger adults with NSTEMI.

Should Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries be Used in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease?

Preoperative renal dysfunction is a major determinant of operative and long-term mortality following cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to assess early and long-term results of CABG in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease (CKD) using a bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) strategy, compared to those without CKD. We retrospectively analyzed data for 2,111 consecutive patients who underwent CABG with BITA between 2000 and 2019. One-to-many propensity score matching was performed to produce a cohort of 132 patients with CKD (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), matched to 358 patients with normal renal function (non-CKD). The primary end-point of interest was late freedom from all-cause mortality. Late hospital readmissions were also assessed. Mean eGFR and serum creatinine were: 49.8 versus 84.3 mL/min/m2 and 146.1 versus 83.6 µmol/L (CKD vs non-CKD, P< 0.001). In-hospital outcomes were similar among matched patients, including mortality (CKD 0.8% vs non-CKD 0%, P= 0.31). At a median follow-up of 6.9 years, there was no significant difference in survival between both groups (hazard ratio (HR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-2.16, P= 0.17). Hospital readmission for cardiovascular causes (including repeat coronary revascularization) was comparable between the 2 groups. However, the risk of hospital readmission for renal causes was higher in patients with CKD (6.7%) compared to non-CKD (1.2%). In a propensity score-matched cohort of patients undergoing BITA-CABG, CKD was not associated with increased early or late mortality, nor was there a greater risk of hospital readmission for cardiovascular events.

Outcomes of early versus delayed invasive strategy in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

We evaluated the 3-year clinical outcomes following early invasive (EI) and delayed invasive (DI) strategies in older adults with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) undergoing successful new-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) implantation to reflect current real-world practice. Overall, 2437 older adults (age, ≥ 65 years) with NSTEMI were recruited from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health. They were divided into two groups: EI (n = 1750) and DI (n = 687). The primary clinical outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined by all-cause death, recurrent MI, any repeat coronary revascularization, and stroke. The secondary clinical outcome was stent thrombosis (ST). After multivariable-adjusted and propensity score-matched analyses, the primary and secondary clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the EI and DI groups. Even after the analysis was confined to those having complex lesions, these major clinical outcomes were similar between these two groups. The EI and DI strategies in older adults with NSTEMI receiving new-generation DES showed comparable results.Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/en/; Unique identifier: KCT0000863.