Repair Of Acute Traumatic Rupture Research Articles

Open versus endovascular repair for patients with acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta

The study objective was to compare the outcome between open and endovascular repair of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta. Seventy-five patients (mean age 38.6 ± 10.7 years) with an acute traumatic aortic rupture were referred to the Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital between January 1990 and January 2010. Between January 1990 and December 2000, 35 patients (33 men, mean age 35.8 ± 11.3 years) underwent surgical repair using cardiopulmonary bypass. From January 2001, an endovascular approach was deliberately chosen; 40 patients (30 male, mean age 41 ± 10.1 years) underwent endovascular repair. The 2 groups were statistically comparable. The overall mortality rates for the surgical and endovascular groups were 11.4% (intraoperative mortality: 8.5%) and 2.5% (intraoperative mortality: 0%), respectively. The mortality rates related to aortic repair for the surgical and endovascular groups were 11.4% and 0%, respectively. In the surgical group, the morbidity rate was 14.2%: 4 cases of recurrent nerve palsy and 1 case of false anastomotic aneurysm were diagnosed at 52 months. In the endovascular group, the morbidity rate was 20%: 3 cases of intraoperative inadvertent coverage of supra-aortic trunks (requiring a secondary procedure in 2 cases after 1 and 2 years to revascularize the supra-aortic trunks), 1 proximal type I endoleak (requiring deployment of a second stent-graft at day 2), 2 stent-graft collapses in the first postoperative month (treated by open repair and explantation in 1 case and by the deployment of a second stent-graft in 1 case), 1 vertebrobasilar insufficiency after left subclavian artery coverage, and 1 intraoperative iliac rupture (surgically repaired). No cases of paraplegia or stroke were observed. The median follow-up was 7.7 (range, 0.4-15) years. Compared with open repair, endovascular repair of traumatic thoracic aortic rupture is associated with a lower death rate but failed to reach statistical significance, most likely because of underpowering. These results prompt us to consider endovascular repair as the first-line therapy for acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta, except in some rare but challenging anatomic situations. New stent-graft designs, sizes, and deployment systems could improve the results of endovascular repair in these indications.

Ten Years of Endovascular Treatment of Traumatic Aortic Transection – A Single Centre Experience

Aim of the study was to present the 10-year results after endovascular repair of acute traumatic rupture of the descending aorta in a single centre. Forty-eight consecutive patients (35 men and 13 women; mean age 39.8 +/- 18 years) with traumatic lesions of the descending aorta were treated between March 1999 and November 2008. All patients were treated within 24 hours of admission. Thirty-one Gore TAG, 13 Medtronic Valiant, 6 Cook Zenith TX2 were used. The technical success rate was 100%, the conversion rate was 0%. Thirty-day mortality rate was 8.3%; overall procedure-related mortality was 2.1% due an acute stent graft compression syndrome. Infolding endografts were observed in 3 patients (6.25%). The left subclavian artery was covered in 35 cases (70%), in one patient revascularisation was necessary. No neurological deficit was reported. Mean follow-up was 51.9 months (4-116 months). No late complications occurred. Endovascular treatment of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta is a safe method, with a lower morbidity and mortality than open repair.

Contemporary results of standard open repair of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta

Contemporary results of standard open repair of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta

Contemporary results of standard open repair of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta

Open repair of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta has been the standard of care for the past half century. Traditional criteria of operative success have been patient survival and prevention of spinal cord ischemia. Historical series have reported a variability of surgical results with relation to the variety of operative approaches. This study aims to update the results obtained with a uniform surgical technique based on a systematic utilization of distal perfusion during aortic cross-clamping. During a 35-year period (1974-2009), 138 consecutive patients with an acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta were repaired with a Dacron graft interposition through a standard left thoracotomy. All patients received a method of circulatory support. A passive 9-mm Gott shunt inserted between the ascending and the descending aorta and delivering a median flow of 3 L/min was used in the first 40 cases. A partial left heart bypass realized from the left atrium to the descending aorta and driven with a centrifugal pump was used in the last 98 consecutive cases. A median flow of 4 L/min was recorded. Mean age of the patients was 27 years and 90.6% of them had associated injuries for a calculated mean ISS of 44. Two outcome variables were analyzed: hospital mortality and postoperative spinal cord ischemic injury. Overall hospital mortality is 5% (7/138 patients). This was improved from 7.5% (3/40) in patients perfused with the Gott shunt to 4% (4/98) in patients protected with the left heart bypass and lowered to 1.5% (1/68) in the last 68 patients. Among 134 cases with an intact preoperative spinal cord, one patient (0.7%) developed a new paraplegia due to a nonfunctional Gott shunt. Among 98 patients perfused with a centrifugal pump-driven left heart bypass, none of the 97 patients (0%) with a preoperative intact spinal cord developed a spinal cord ischemic deficit. Conventional open surgical repair of acute traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta performed with an orderly monitored circulatory support can be accomplished with a very low rate of mortality and spinal cord injury. Compared with the Gott shunt, a left heart bypass propelled with a centrifugal pump is technically a more versatile method of perfusion, and it provides higher hemodynamic performance.

Acute Traumatic Rupture of the Aorta: Repair by Simple Aortic Cross-Clamping

This report describes the techniques used in 16 patients for repair of acute traumatic rupture of the aorta. Direct aortic cross-clamping (13 to 27 minutes) was used without additional methods of spinal cord protection. Direct suture was possible in (56%) of the 9 patients with partial rupture of the aorta but in only 1 (14%) of the 7 patients with complete disruption. In the remaining patients, the repair was carried out by interposing Gore-Tex patches (4 patients) or open tubular grafts (6 patients) using a simplified method, which is described. The 2 deaths, 1 intraoperative and 1 postoperative, were unrelated to the technique. There were no additional perioperative complications. Direct aortic cross-clamping and repair by direct suture or open tubular graft, as described, greatly simplify the correction of acute traumatic rupture of the aorta, and their use is strongly recommended.

Primary Repair of Traumatic Aortic Disruption

From 1979 to 1985, 22 patients (18 male) underwent repair of acute traumatic rupture of the aorta. Ages ranged from 15 to 75 years (mean, 35 years). All patients sustained deceleration injuries in automobile accidents. The majority had injuries to multiple systems and evidence of mediastinal widening on routine chest roentgenograms. Aortography confirmed transection in the descending thoracic aorta near the ligamentum arteriosum in 20. Primary repair was achieved in 15 patients; it was performed in the last 10 consecutive patients. Seven patients had repair with a prosthetic graft. Survival was 82%. Postoperative morbidity usually was related to associated injuries. Primary repair of aortic transection can be accomplished in most patients without the use of prosthetic material.

Acute rupture of the heart after blunt trauma: report of a successful operation

<h2>Summary</h2> A case of successful surgical repair of acute traumatic rupture of the right atrium is presented. The patient was a 17-year-old male admitted 12 minutes after a traffic accident with cardiac arrest. After resuscitation, median sternotomy was performed, cardiac tamponade released, and a tear in the right atrium repaired.

Repair of Acute Traumatic Rupture of the Aorta Without Extracorporeal Circulation

n this era of rapid transportation, the increasing incidence of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta has almost paralleled the inI creasing number and speed of highway vehicles. Strassmann [231 found only a 1% incidence of aortic rupture in 7,000 autopsies in 1947. Recent reports from both the United States [8] and Europe [241 show that the incidence of traumatic rupture of the aorta is now between 10 and 15% in automobile fatalities. Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta carries a grave but not necessarily hopeless prognosis if it is managed adequately. Death by exsanguination is instantaneous in 80 to 90% of the patients who sustain aortic rupture [lo, 171. In the remaining 10 to 20% the aortic blood is contained by the adventitia, pleura, and surrounding tissue. A false aneurysm is formed, and the patient survives at least temporarily. Since most of these patients will die from lethal secondary hemorrhage within three weeks if they are not treated [lo, 171, it is imperative that the diagnosis be established quickly and that repair be carried out.