Donor Renal Transplantation Research Articles

Validation of the Prognostic Kidney Donor Risk Index Scoring System of Deceased Donors for Renal Transplantation in the Netherlands.

The prognostic Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI)-developed and internally validated in the United States-is a widely used tool to predict transplant outcome of a deceased donor kidney. The KDRI is currently used for longevity matching between donors and recipients in the United States. We aimed to externally validate the KDRIdonor-only and KDRIfull as proposed by Rao et al (2009). KDRIdonor-only consist of 10 donor factors, and KDRIfull with an additional 4 transplant factors. We used the Dutch Organ Transplantation Registry to include 3201 adult recipients transplanted from 2002 to 2012. The median Dutch KDRI was 1.21 and comparable with the year 2012 in the United States (median of 1.24). The calibration-slope was 0.98 and 0.96 for the KDRIfull and KDRIdonor-only, respectively, indicating that predictions of graft failure were on average similar. The discriminative ability (Harrell C) of the KDRIfull and the KDRIdonor-only at 5 years was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.64), and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.61-0.63), respectively. We found misspecification of 3 KDRI factors: age (P = 0.002), weight (P = 0.017), and cold ischemia time (P < 0.001). Adding the use of inotropic drugs before donation (P = 0.040) and the interaction between circulatory-death donor kidneys and prolonged cold ischemic time (>24 hours vs 12 hours; P = 0.059) could improve predictive ability. The KDRI performs equal in the Dutch population. Discriminative ability of the KDRI indicates limited clinical use for adequate individualized decisions. An updated KDRI may contribute to a standardized policy meeting the growing demand of donor kidneys in the Eurotransplant region.

Quality of life of renal transplant donors

Introduction: End stage renal disease has a high rate of mortality and morbidity. Kidney transplantation remains the best treatment option in comparison to other forms of renal replacement therapy. Live related donor renal transplantation was started at TUTH in 2008. Compared to other established centers, the outcome of transplantation was comparable. Though there is considerable evidence showing that donors are able to return to their healthy life, quality of life (QOL) assessment using standardized questionnaires has not yet been done in our centre. This study was carried out in order to compare QOL before and after donor nephrectomy.&#x0D; Methods: Short Form 36 version 2 (SF36v2) was used to assess the quality of life of kidney donors. Interview was conducted just before and three months after donor nephrectomy. Eight domains of quality of life score were compared using SPSS 17.0. Kolmogorov Smirnov test was used to check normal distribution of data. Mean scores before and after donation was compared with paired t test. Multivariate linear regression analysis was done to find out variables predicting poorer outcome.&#x0D; Results: Out of eight domains of quality of life, bodily pain, physical functioning and physical role limitation were decreased 3 months after donation. However, this did not have any impact on overall quality of life of donors. Increasing age was found to an independent predicter of poorer quality of life. However gender and donation status had no significance.&#x0D; Conclusion: Quality of life of renal transplant donors was not affected by donor nephrectomy. Long term follow up and quality of study is required in order to assess the changes in physical health component with time.

P164 Role of anti-mica antibodies in graft survival of renal transplant recipients of India: A single centre experience

Aim To find the incidence of MHC class I chain-related chain A (MICA) alloantibodies in patients undergoing live related donor (LRD) renal transplantation and their association with short-term graft survival. Methods Pre-transplant, consecutive, serum samples of ESRD patients undergoing first renal allograft transplantation were tested for anti-MICA antibodies. Association of various demographics, HLA-A + B + DRB1 mismatches and HLA antibody screen with MICA antibodies was assessed using Pearson’s Chi-square test. A multivariate analysis was also performed to check for potential confounders. The effect of pre-transplant blood transfusions on antibodies against HLA Class 1 & class II, or MICA was studied. Results Out of 646 serum samples for MICA antibodies, 94 (14.6%) were positive and 552(85.4%) negative for MICA antibodies. Patients with MICA antibody had a graft survival 89.3% as compared to 94.7% in patients without MICA antibody (P = 0.01). The hazards ratio for all patients was 3.744 (P = 0.01). MANOVA effect was determined for three factors (HLA antibody, MICA antibody & HLA mismatch) and Graft survival which was statistically significant. Two of the three ANOVA’s were statistically significant viz. MICA antibody and presence of HLA antibody. Conclusions MICA antibodies were present in 14.6% of the patients. Preformed MICA antibodies independently increase the risk of kidney rejection and therefore a guideline should be made for mandatory testing of these antibodies prior to transplant.

Patient and Graft Survival Among Sexagenarian and Septuagenarian Renal Transplant Recipients and Donors: The Context for Older Recipients.

Due to the increasing number of patients with end-stage renal disease, there is a growing demand for transplants for recipients and donors aged 60 years and older. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we performed survival analyses and multivariate logistic regression to help guide transplant professional decisions regarding the selection of graft type (living vs deceased) and donor age (60-69 vs 70+ years) for recipients aged 60 years and older.

Pregnancy in Renal Transplant Recipients and Donors

Women with renal transplants have restoration of fertility with improved kidney function; however, pregnancy rates in renal transplant recipients appear to be lower than the general population, which might be influenced by patient choice. Women with renal transplants need to evaluate potential neonatal outcomes, graft outcomes, and risks to their own health to make informed decisions about conception. Pregnancy should be carefully planned in renal transplant recipients to reduce risk for graft loss, optimize pregnancy outcomes, and ensure immunosuppression regimes are nonteratogenic. Neonatal outcomes remain significantly worse for women with renal transplants than healthy controls, particularly for those with reduced graft function, hence prepregnancy, antenatal, and postpartum care of women with renal transplants should be guided by a multidisciplinary team of nephrologists and specialist obstetricians.

Effect of Alprazolam on Redox Status in Renal Transplantation Donors and Recipients.

BACKGROUND Benzodiazepines are the most popular premedication drugs thought to act through the GABA/benzodiazepine receptor complex and alprazolam is one of the most potent benzodiazepines that have a quick onset. While there is a growing body of evidence supporting alprazolam in the amelioration of redox status in animals, no study has been performed concerning its antioxidant activity in humans. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effect of alprazolam on redox status. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study was a four-group randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited from Acibadem University Acibadem International Hospital and included a convenience sample of 82 donors and recipients undergoing renal transplantation. Patients were randomly divided into four groups. While donors and recipients in experimental groups (G1 and G3) were administered alprazolam 0.5 mg orally one hour before the operation, those in control groups (G2 and G4) were not. Serum advanced oxidative protein products, total thiol, free hemoglobin, ischemic modified albumin, and sialic acid levels at different time points were measured to evaluate the redox status. RESULTS All oxidative stress parameters were higher in the alprazolam premedication groups (G1, G3) at all time points than in the control groups (G2, G4). Basal values of oxidative parameters (at time point T1) in patients with CKD (G3, G4) were lower than in healthy donors (G1, G2). CONCLUSIONS Alprazolam premedication in donors and end-stage renal failure patients undergoing renal transplantation does not improve redox homeostasis but further experimental studies are needed.

Post-Operative Rhabdomyolysis in a Renal Transplant Donor

Post-Operative Rhabdomyolysis in a Renal Transplant Donor

Distribution of HLA Class II Antigen in Renal Transplant Patients and Donors Visiting Tertiary Care Hospital of Karnataka State in South India

Renal transplantation is the most successful treatment option for chronic renal failure patients. But success of any transplantation depends on HLA antigen matching between the recipient and the donor. This study is the first report from Karnataka state of South India to find out distribution of HLA-class II antigens in live renal transplant recipients and donors visiting a tertiary care hospital. In this study, HLA-DR allele frequencies were studied in 314 renal transplant recipients and donors visited our hospital, during 2005–2013. HLA tissue typing was done by polymerase chain reaction using sequence specific primers. Then antigen frequencies were obtained and analyzed. A total of 32 HLA-DRB1 alleles were identified in the renal transplant recipients and donors. High frequency DRB1 alleles found in our patients and donors were DRB1 * 15(25.4%), DRB1 * 14(12.2%), DRB1 * 04(11.3%), DRB1 * 13(10.2%), DRB1 * 07(8.3%). DRB1 * 15 allele was the most frequent DRB1 antigen in both males and females. Also we have found that females outnumbered males among the donors. The results showed significant heterogeneity in HLA-DRB1 alleles. The most frequent HLA-DRB3, DRB4, DRB5 alleles we observed are DRB3 * 01/02, DRB4 * 01, DRB5 * 01/02 respectively.

The reverse remodeling of the aorta in patients after renal transplantation - the value of aortic stiffness index: prospective echocardiographic study

BackgroundAtherosclerosis is regarded as a combination of two major separate diseases: atherosis and sclerosis. Sclerotic component depends on deterioration of elastic properties of the aortic wall and is called aortic stiffness. The most valuable, non-invasive method of aortic stiffness assessment is echocardiography, which allows to calculate the aortic stiffness index (ASI). ASI is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in different groups of patients. The main aim of study was the assessment of the aortic reverse remodeling in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) after renal transplantation (RT).MethodsStudy group involved 42 patients aged 43.3 ± 12.6 years, including 19 women aged 49.9 ± 10.9 years and 23 men aged 41.5 ± 12.91 years, who have undergone RT from non-related renal transplant donors, The study protocol has been consisted of 5 stages: 1 week after RT, 3 months after RT, 6 months after RT, 1 year after RT and 3 years after RT. The echocardiographic examination was performed and measurements of Aomax, Aomin were done. On the base of obtained parameters ASI, aortic distensibility (AD) and aortic strain (AS) were calculated according to adequate formulas.ResultsThe improvement of indices characterizing the elastic properties of aorta were noted. These changes attained the statistically significant level only at the end of the observation. ASI just after RT was equal – 4.65 ± 1.58, three months after RT – 4.54 ± 1.49, six months after RT – 4.59 ± 1.61, one year after RT – 4.35 ± 1.21 and three years after RT – 3.35 ± 1.29, while AD reached respectively – 6.55 ± 3.76 cm2/dyn−110−6 just after RT, − 6.38 ± 3.42 cm2/dyn−110−6 three months after RT, − 6.53 ± 3.60 cm2/dyn−110−6 six months after RT, − 6.48 ± 2.79 cm2/dyn−110−6 one year after RT and – 8.03 ± 3.95 cm2/dyn−110−6 three years after RT. Noted AS values were equal – 6.61 ± 4.05%, just after RT, − 6.40 ± 3.58% three months after RT, − 6.56 ± 3.76%, six months after RT, − 6.45 ± 2.80% one year after RT, − 8.01 ± 3.97%. and three years after RT. The exact analysis of parameters concerning aortic function showed that to achieve ASI, AD and AS improvement, long time was needed, because the most significant changes of these indices were observed only between 1 year and 3 years after RT.ConclusionsThere is a relationship between renal transplantation and improvement of the aortic elastic properties. The recovery of the renal function allows to initiate the reparative processes leading to at least partial restitution of the structure and features of the aorta, which is called reverse remodelling. Improvement of aortic wall elastic properties after renal transplantation is a continuous and prolonged process.

Comparison between Two-sample Method with 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Gates' Method and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Values by Formula Based Methods in Healthy Kidney Donor Population.

Purpose of the Study:Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the most important parameter for the assessment of renal function. GFR by plasma sampling technique is considered accurate in the selection of donors for renal transplantation. Estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations using Gates’ method and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft–Gault (CG) equations are simple methods but have not been validated in the Indian population. Hence, we aimed to assess the correlation between these three techniques.Materials and Methods:The plasma sampling technique was done using two samples at 60 and 180 min after injection of 1 mCi (37MBq) 99mTc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) in 66 healthy donors. Age, sex, height, weight, and plasma creatinine were recorded. Normalized GFR (nGFR) by two-sample method and eGFR (for Gates’, MDRD, and CG) values were calculated using formulae.Results:There were 14 male and 52 female donors. Mean age was 46.56 ± 12.88 years (24–69 years). Mean height was 153.74 ± 8.35 cm, whereas mean weight was 56.97 ± 11.88 kg. Mean nGFR value was 80.4 for two-sample method while mean eGFR value for Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 83.3, 89.36, and 97.47 ml/min/1.73 m2 (eligibility value at our institution = 70), respectively. While the correlation between nGFR and eGFR CG and MDRD was weak moderate (correlation coefficient = 0.5), nGFR and eGFR Gates’ had a moderate correlation (0.686). Mean total bias for eGFR Gates’, CG, and MDRD were 2.87, 8.93, and 17.0, respectively. P30 of eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD were 60.6%, 57.6%, and 62.1%, respectively.Conclusions:Due to the large variability in eGFR Gates’, CG and MDRD, nGFR estimation using the plasma sampling technique with 99mTc-DTPA appears necessary while screening healthy donors for renal transplantation.

Role of CT scan in diagnosis of renal lymphangiectasia: our single-center experience

Background: Renal lymphangiectasia is rarely reported benign renal disorder of lymphatic malformation. Though found incidentally; it presents with nonspecific symptoms and shows characteristic findings in radiological imaging studies.Aim: Here, we report eight patients with symptoms, laboratory and imaging findings compatible with renal lymphangiectasia. This report describes clinical and laboratory characteristics, treatment, Imaging findings and outcome of a series of patients with renal lymphangiectasia and reviews the literature.Methods and material: Eight patients (mean age 45 years, male:female ratio 3:1) from 1st January 2011 to 30th June 2016; showing renal lymphangiectasia as incidental finding on CT IVP were included in the series. Imaging and laboratory findings were reviewed. Two out of eight patients (25%) underwent aspiration of collection and laboratory findings confirmed the diagnosis of renal lymphangiectasia. Four out of eight patients (50%) did not undergo aspiration of fluid and were offered conservative treatment. Two out of eight patients (25%) were donors for renal transplantation who were managed conservatively.Results: Renal lymphangiectasia was diagnosed on CT IVP. In each case, where aspiration of collection fluid was offered, the laboratory diagnosis of renal lymphangiectasia was confirmed and patients were managed conservatively. However, large collection in one patient was relieved by percutaneous aspiration.Conclusions: Renal lymphangiectasia can be diagnosed with CT scan and confirmed by laboratory tests. As it may be confused with other cystic lesions of kidney; proper diagnosis and exclusion of other differentials can be effectively offered by CT scan IVP, which can avoid unnecessary invasive treatment options.

Effect of TREM-1 blockade and single nucleotide variants in experimental renal injury and kidney transplantation.

Renal ischemia reperfusion (IR)-injury induces activation of innate immune response which sustains renal injury and contributes to the development of delayed graft function (DGF). Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (TREM-1) is a pro-inflammatory evolutionary conserved pattern recognition receptor expressed on a variety of innate immune cells. TREM-1 expression increases following acute and chronic renal injury. However, the function of TREM-1 in renal IR is still unclear. Here, we investigated expression and function of TREM-1 in a murine model of renal IR using different TREM-1 inhibitors: LP17, LR12 and TREM-1 fusion protein. In a human study, we analyzed the association of non-synonymous single nucleotide variants in the TREM1 gene in a cohort comprising 1263 matching donors and recipients with post-transplant outcomes, including DGF. Our findings demonstrated that, following murine IR, renal TREM-1 expression increased due to the influx of Trem1 mRNA expressing cells detected by in situ hybridization. However, TREM-1 interventions by means of LP17, LR12 and TREM-1 fusion protein did not ameliorate IR-induced injury. In the human renal transplant cohort, donor and recipient TREM1 gene variant p.Thr25Ser was not associated with DGF, nor with biopsy-proven rejection or death-censored graft failure. We conclude that TREM-1 does not play a major role during experimental renal IR and after kidney transplantation.

Old habits die hard; does early urinary catheter removal affect kidney size, bacteriuria and UTI after renal transplantation?

Introduction: Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice in chronic renal failure patients. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of urinary catheter removal time on transplanted kidney size and incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated the clinical outcomes of 109 consecutive live donor renal transplant recipients from December 2011 to July 2014. Routine ultrasound examinations were performed on donor’s kidney prior to operation and one month later. Kidney volume was calculated. UTI and bacteriuria were evaluated one month later. Patients were divided into two groups based on time of Foley catheter removal (before and after fifth day posttransplantation). Results: In this study 74 males (67.9%) and 35 females (32.1%) were evaluated. Sixty-six patients (57.92%) were in group 1. None of the patients with positive urine culture had UTI but bacteriuria occurred in all of them (21.1%). Bacteriuria time after transplantation and catheter removal was significantly later in group 1 and it was not different in female group but they were later in male group. The mean renal volume increase was positively correlated to renal transplant recipient and donor’s age and donor’s body mass index (BMI) (P<0.05). Conclusion: This study showed that the time of catheter removal after kidney transplantation does not affect incidence of UTI but increases the probability of bacteria in men whose catheter was removed within 5 days after transplantation. We also found that the renal volume change is not associated with catheter removal time and bacteriuria.

Criteria for and Appropriateness of Renal Transplantation in Elderly Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease: A Literature Review and Position Statement on Behalf of the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Descartes Working Group and European Renal Best Practice.

During the last 20 years, waiting lists for renal transplantation (RT) have grown significantly older. However, elderly patients (ie ≥65 years of age) are still more rarely referred or accepted to waiting lists and, if enlisted, have less chances of actually receiving a kidney allograft, than younger counterparts. In this review, we looked at evidence for the benefits and risks of RT in the elderly trying to answer the following questions: Should RT be advocated for elderly patients? What should be the criteria to accept elderly patients on the waiting list for RT? What strategies might be used to increase the rate of RT in waitlisted elderly candidates? For selected elderly patients, RT was shown to be superior to dialysis in terms of patient survival. Virtually all guidelines recommend that patients should not be deemed ineligible for RT based on age alone, although a short life expectancy generally might preclude RT. Concerning the assessment of comorbidities in the elderly, special attention should be paid to cardiac evaluation and screening for malignancy. Comorbidity scores and frailty assessment scales might help the decision making on eligibility. Psychosocial issues should also be evaluated. To overcome the scarcity of organ donors, elderly RT candidates should be encouraged to consider expanded criteria donors and living donors, as alternatives to deceased standard criteria donors. It has been demonstrated that expanded criteria donor RT in patients 60 years or older is associated with higher survival rates than remaining on dialysis, whereas living donor RT is superior to all other options.

Accessory renal arteries: Prevalence in resistant hypertension and an important role in nonresponse to radiofrequency renal denervation.

The aim of this study was to understand the role of accessory renal arteries in resistant hypertension, and to establish their role in nonresponse to radiofrequency renal denervation (RDN) procedures. Prior studies suggest a role for accessory renal arteries in hypertensive syndromes, and recent clinical trials of renal denervation report that these anomalies are highly prevalent in resistant hypertension. This study evaluated the relationships among resistant hypertension, accessory renal arteries, and the response to radiofrequency (RF) renal denervation. Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from 58 patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RF renal denervation (RDN) were evaluated. Results were compared with CT scans in 57 healthy, normotensive subjects undergoing screening as possible renal transplant donors. All scans were carefully studied for accessory renal arteries, and were correlated with long term blood pressure reduction. Accessory renal arteries were markedly more prevalent in the hypertensive patients than normotensive renal donors (59% vs 32% respectively, p=0.004). RDN had an overall nonresponse rate of 29% (response rate 71%). Patients without accessory vessels had a borderline higher response rate to RDN than those with at least one accessory vessel (83% vs 62% respectively, p=0.076) and a higher RDN response than patients with untreated accessory arteries (83% vs 55%; p=0.040). For accessory renal arteries and nonresponse, the sensitivity was 76%, specificity 49%, with positive and negative predictive values 38% and 83% respectively. Accessory renal arteries were markedly over-represented in resistant hypertensives compared with healthy controls. While not all patients with accessory arteries were nonresponders, nonresponse was related to both the presence and non-treatment of accessory arteries. Addressing accessory renal arteries in future clinical trials may improve RDN therapeutic efficacy.

Epidemiology of fibromuscular dysplasia: A review of the literature.

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a non-atherosclerotic, non-inflammatory disease of medium sized arteries that has been described in multiple anatomic territories with a wide variety of manifestations (e.g. beading, stenosis, occlusion, aneurysm, or dissection). While the first case of FMD is thought to have been described over 75 years ago, the causes, natural history, and epidemiology of FMD in the general population remain incompletely understood. This article reviews important historical and contemporary contributions to the FMD literature that inform our current understanding of the prevalence and epidemiology of this important disorder. A particular focus is given to studies which form the basis for FMD prevalence estimates. Prevalence estimates for renal FMD are derived from renal transplant donor studies and sub-studies of clinical trials of renal artery stenting; however, it is unclear how well these estimates generalize to the overall population as a whole. Newer data are emerging examining the genetic associations and environmental interactions with FMD. Significant contributions to the understanding of FMD have come from the United States Registry for Fibromuscular Dysplasia; however, many unanswered questions remain, and future studies are required to further characterize FMD epidemiology in general populations and advance our understanding of this important disorder.

Clinical analysis on effect of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in elderly donors for renal transplantation

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy in elderly donors for renal transplantation. A retrospective analysis was conducted with 123 cases of retroperitoneoscopic living donor kidney transplantation in 309th Hospital of PLA from March 2011 to March 2014, including 44 elderly donors (age≥55 years) and 79 young to middle-aged donors (age <55 years). Comparisons were made in terms of postoperative complications in both donors and recipients, renal function recovery in the donors and function of graft in the recipients. The clinical baseline data of the two groups shows that glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of donors in the elderly donor group was lower than the young donor group (P=0.04). The 123 donors all underwent retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy successfully. Postoperative complications in donors and recipients of both groups had no significant differences (P=0.60; P=1.00). In the elderly donor group, the mean serum creatinine level of donors was significantly higher than that in the young donors group [(115.8±22.3) vs (102.5±16.3) μmol/L, P<0.01] 3 days after operation; and estimated GFR (eGFR) was lower [(53.0±9.1)vs(59.6±8.3)ml·min(-1)·(1.73 m(2))(-1,) P<0.01]. Serum creatinine and eGFR of the two groups showed no significant differences one week and six months after surgery (all P>0.05). Four recipients in the elderly donor group had delayed graft function (DGF), 3 had acute rejection; 8 recipients in the young donor group had DGF, 5 had acute rejection; no statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 groups (both P=1.00). Recipients' eGFR were higher in the young donor group than in the elderly donor group at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after surgery, but with no statistically significant differences(all P>0.05). After (27.8±12.6) months follow-up, 1 recipient in the elderly donor group died from pulmonary infection; two recipients in the young donor group had kidney dysfunction. Graft survival in the two groups showed no significant difference(P=0.95). Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy is safe and feasible for elderly donors. With careful preoperative evaluation, precise operation, and close postoperative monitoring and follow-up, it could provide satisfactory clinical outcome.

Kidney Transplantation From Donors with Hepatitis B.

The growing demand for organ donors to supply the increasing number of patients on kidney waiting lists has led most transplant centers to develop protocols that allow safe use of organs from donors with special clinical situations previously regarded as contraindications. Deceased donors with previous hepatitis B may be a safe resource to increase the donor pool even if there is still controversy among transplantation centers regarding the use of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donors for renal transplantation. However, when allocated to serology-matched recipients, kidney transplantation from donors with hepatitis B may result in excellent short-term outcome. Many concerns may arise in the long-term outcome, and studies must address the evaluation of the progression of liver disease and the rate of reactivation of liver disease in the recipients. Accurate selection and matching of both donor and recipient and correct post-transplant management are needed to achieve satisfactory long-term outcomes.

Impact of Donor Source on the Outcome of Live Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single Center Experience.

BackgroundRenal transplantation is the ideal method for management of end-stage renal disease. The use of living donors for renal transplantation was critical for early development in the field and preceded the use of cadaveric donors. Most donors are related genetically to the recipients, like a parent, a child, or a sibling of the recipient, but there are an increasing percentage of cases where donors are genetically unrelated like spouses, friends, or altruistic individuals. Donor shortages constitute the major barrier for kidney transplantation, and much effort has been made to increase the supply of living donors. The impact of donor source on the outcome of renal transplantation is not adequately studied in our country.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of donor source on the outcome of live donor kidney transplantation.Patients and MethodsFrom March 1976 to December 2013, the number of patients that underwent living renal transplantation sharing at least one HLA haplotype with their donors was 2,485. We divided these patients into two groups: (1) 2,075 kidney transplant recipients (1,554 or 74.9% male and 521 or 25.1% female) for whom the donors were living related, (2) 410 kidney transplant recipients (297 or 72.4% male and 113 or 27.6% female) for whom the donors were living unrelated. All patients received immunosuppressive therapy, consisting of a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, or azathioprine and prednisolone. We compared acute rejection and complication rates, as well as long-term graft and patient survival of both groups. Demographic characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Graft survival and patient survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsThe percentages of patients with acute vascular rejection were significantly higher in the unrelated group, while percentages of patients with no rejection were significantly higher in the related group, but there were no significant differences regarding patient and graft survivals between both groups.ConclusionsKidney transplant recipients who received their grafts either from live related donors or live unrelated donors had comparable patient and graft survival outcomes.

MP32-15 CALCULATION OF GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE FROM RENAL VOLUME IN KIDNEY DONORS BY USING HERTS FORMULA

You have accessJournal of UrologyTransplantation & Vascular Surgery: Renal Transplantation & Vascular Surgery II1 Apr 2016MP32-15 CALCULATION OF GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE FROM RENAL VOLUME IN KIDNEY DONORS BY USING HERTS FORMULA Vimal Dixit Vimal DixitVimal Dixit More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.1310AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Till now we have either 24 hour urine creatinine clearance test or isotope renogram as investigation modalities to measure GFR. The former test is known for its flaws while latter is supposed as the best available method. Assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains an important step in evaluation of kidney donor for live related renal transplantation. In developing countries like India, availability and cost of isotope renogram remain a significant constraint. In this study, we applied Herts formula for calculation of GFR and assessed its accuracy in indian population. METHODS This study included 61 kidney donors admitted in hospital for live related kidney transplantation. Anatomical assessment and volume rendered 3D images of both kidneys were obtained with 64 - slice helical CT scanner. GFR & differential renal function were estimated with DTPA renogram. GFR was also calculated using renal volume with Herts Formula and then compared with eGFR obtained from DTPA renogram. RESULTS The correlation coefficient between eGFR and vc GFR comes to 0.472 with a p value of 0.000123 showing significantly strong correlation between the two. The average of difference between estimated and volume based calculated GFR of each donor was 9.20 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS This study evaluated volume based formula for calculation of GFR as proposed by Herts et al. and found that in healthy adults this formula has better accuracy in predicting GFR than other available formulae. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e433 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Vimal Dixit More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...