Repair Of Renal Artery Aneurysms Research Articles

Robotic Surgery for Elective Repair of Visceral and Renal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review.

Background: The treatment choice of visceral artery aneurysms in an elective setting is debated. The durability and the risk of reintervention with endovascular treatment are still reasons for concern, whereas open surgery is invasive and burdened by major complications. In anecdotal reports and isolated studies, robotic-assisted surgery seems to provide the possibility of a minimally invasive treatment and the durability of traditional open surgery, but the literature supporting this view is scarce. This review aims to collect the results of robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Methods: A systematic search of the main research databases was performed: the study endpoints were mortality and conversion rates, perioperative morbidity, and freedom from late complications and reinterventions. Results: We identified 16 studies on 53 patients. All cases underwent successful resection, with three conversions to laparoscopy. Perioperative and aneurysm-related mortality were nil. Over a median follow-up of 9 months, two reinterventions were reported (3.6%). Conclusion: The robotic technique is safe and effective in treating splenic and renal artery aneurysms, and it should be considered as a valuable alternative to endovascular and open repair, although larger sample sizes and a longer-term follow-up are necessary to confirm such results.

3D impression to facilitate in situ surgical renal segmental artery aneurysm repair: A novel open approach option for an unusual vascular condition.

Renal Artery Aneurysms (RAA) affect approximately 0.01%-0.97% of the population. Early diagnosis, thorough 3D-preoperative planning, and timely surgical treatment may offer effective and safe management. We report the open reparation of a segmental renal artery saccular aneurysm close to the bifurcation with detailed preoperative planning based on 3D printing, and with successful postoperative results. We report the case of a 36-year-old man with a 3.5 × 5cm segmental renal artery saccular aneurysm close to the bifurcation, for which endovascular management was ruled out and open management was chosen with detailed preoperative planning based on 3D printing and with successful postoperative results. When an open approach is chosen in the RAA treatment, a detailed study of the anatomical configuration of the RAAs is mandatory, and life-size 3D printing is a valuable tool that could contribute to the operative technique, reduce surgical times associated with renal ischemia and provide minute details that would make a clear anatomical difference during in situ repair.

Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair With Balloon-assisted Coil Embolization

Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair With Balloon-assisted Coil Embolization

Successful repair of transplant renal artery aneurysm (TRAA)

BackgroundTransplant renal artery aneurysm (TRAA) is rare. TRAA that develops post transplantation consists of 0.10% of the vascular complications post renal transplant (Transplant Proc 41:1609-1614, 2009; Indian J Urol 29:42-47, 2013).Case presentationWe report a case of TRAA in an asymptomatic young female. CT angiogram with detailed 3D reconstruction showed a 2.6 × 2.2 cm wide neck saccular TRAA arising from the anterior segmental branch of the graft renal artery (Figs. 2 and 3). A multidisciplinary team of interventional radiologists, vascular and urologist was involved for preoperative surgical planning and unique repair methods. Endovascular and percutaneous approaches were deemed not feasible, and an open in vivo approach with a saphenous vein graft was taken.ConclusionTRAA, albeit rare, is a complication that can occur post renal transplant. In-vivo surgical repair of TRAA is feasible with a multidisciplinary approach and careful preoperative planning. Saphenous vein graft is still a versatile graft and can be used as a conduit successfully.

Outcomes of endovascular, open surgical and autotransplantation techniques for renal artery aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Renal artery aneurysms (RAA) can be repaired with endovascular exclusion (EVR), open repair (OR), or ex-vivo repair with renal autotransplantation (ERAT). This systematic review compares repair indications, aneurysm characteristics, and complications following these interventions. A systematic review of databases including MEDLINE, PUBMED, and EMBASE by two independent reviewers for studies from January 2000-November 2022. All studies evaluating repair indications, RAA morphology, morbidity and mortality following EVR, OR, and ERAT were included. A total of 38 studies were included with 1540 EVR, 2377 OR and 109 ERAT subjects. Increasing aneurysm size, or diameters >20 mm, were the most common repair indications across EVR and OR (n = 537; 48%), and ERAT (n = 23; 52%). All ERAT repairs were at or distal to renal artery bifurcations (n = 46). Meta-analyses demonstrated significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) with EVR compared to OR (mean difference -4.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.69 to -2.43, P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in mean aneurysm diameter (P = 0.23), total complications (P = 0.17), and mortality (P = 0.85). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) across studies most commonly included acute renal failure (EVR 4.9% vs. OR 7.0%). Nephrectomy was the most common major complication in ERAT (5.5%). Outcomes following EVR and OR of RAAs are comparable. EVR offers a shorter LOS, with no difference in morbidity or mortality. ERAT is currently only utilized for distal RAAs, however carries higher risk of infarction and nephrectomy necessitating specialized expertise or algorithms to assist appropriate selection of repair methods.

Multimodal Repair of Renal Artery Aneurysm – 10-year Single Center Experience

Renal artery aneurysm (RAA) is a rare disease with various treatment options in indicated patients. In the current survey, the 10-year experience in treatment of RAAs using different endovascular and surgical treatments depending on RAA characteristics is discussed. All patients undergone RAA treatment via endovascular or surgical approaches at our center between January 2010 and December 2020 were enrolled. Patient demographics and peri-operative and late results were collected from a prospectively maintained database. Eleven patients with RAA underwent treatment as follows: 4 patients received endovascular approach, 4 patients underwent in-situ RAA repair, and kidney autotransplantations were carried out in 3 patients. In all three treatment groups, the first therapeutic attempt was successful and none of the patients underwent secondary intervention due to RAA. Kidney autotransplantation was associated with a higher blood loss and a longer time of procedure compared to that of endovascular approach and in-situ repair. In-hospital postoperative complications were reported in 5 patients, including renal pole perfusion defect, renal artery thrombosis, and urinary tract infection. No acute kidney organ loss was seen, but 1 patient suffered from chronic kidney loss due to renal artery occlusion. In 1 patient undergoing autotransplantation, ureter anastomosis was reported, which led to acute renal failure, and a surgical treatment with resection and reanastomosis of the ureter was necessary. Hypertension was not resolved after RAA repair in any of the patients with preoperative hypertension. RAA treatment selection depends on patient characteristics, anatomy, location, and arising branches of the aneurysm. In cases with complex anatomy, treatment strategy could not be just decided based on consensus guidelines, but a multidisciplinary team is required. Interventional therapies showed excellent results in non-complicated proximal aneurysms, especially regarding the length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidities. Open surgery is a complementary alternative in cases where minimally invasive therapy is not possible. Ex-situ repair with autotransplantation could be considered for anatomically complex distal aneurysms.

Renal artery aneurysm repair by auto-transplantation in a 4-year-old girl with renovascular hypertension

Hypertension is an uncommon but potentially serious finding in children. Renovascular disease is responsible for 8–10% of all cases and is treatable. We present a 4 year old girl with hypertension of 120–148 mmHg as an incidental finding while having yearly follow up due to a dermatofibroma on her back. She was otherwise well with no other significant medical issues. She received treatment with antihypertensives and multiple laboratory and imaging studies were performed; the imaging studies demonstrated a fusiform aneurysm of the left renal artery. After reviewing the images, and following discussion in a multidisciplinary team including transplant and vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, paediatric nephrologists and a hypertension nurse specialist, a decision was taken to repair the aneurysm by performing a kidney auto-transplant. The child underwent successful surgery and on follow up she is normotensive without medications and has normal renal function. Although the technique of treating renal artery aneurysm by extracorporeal repair and auto-transplant has been described in adults, in paediatrics this is still an innovative technique. This is the first successful report of a RAA repair in the paediatric population. This is the first descriptive case report of a successful aneurysm resection and renal auto-transplant in a child.

Single Centre Experience in Open and Endovascular Treatment of Renal Artery Aneurysms

Background: The true incidence and natural history of renal artery aneurysm (RAA) remain unclear and still exists controversy over indication for treatment. Several techniques of conventional surgical reconstructions are described in literature, and more recently endovascular therapies have been reported with satisfying results and lower complication rate. This paper aims to investigate the outcomes of both endovascular and open repair of RAA achieved in a single institution involving 3 medical teams (urology, vascular surgery and neuroradiology). Material and Methods: We conducted a single-centre retrospective observational study about all patients surgically or endovascularly treated for RAA over a 15-year period. Pre-operative, procedural and post-operative data at the early, mid- and long-term follow-up were collected and analysed, focusing on operative technique used for repair and related outcomes. Results: A total of 27 patients (n = 17 (63%) women, mean age 58 ± 13.2, n = 26 saccular RAA) were included. Mean aneurysm was size was 18.8 ± 6.3 mm. Most diagnosis were accidental. Symptomatic RAA showed with macroscopic haematuria (n = 3, 25.9%), unstable hypertension (n = 2; 7%), chronic lumbar pain (n = 1, 3.7%) and renal infarct (n = 1, 3.7%).Conventional surgery (ex-vivo repair, aneurysmorraphy, aneurysm resection and end-to-end anastomosis) was performed in 14 (51.8%) cases and endovascular coiling embolization in 13 (48.2%). Mean hospital length of stay was 5.4 ± 3.6 days. Intensive Care Unit stay was needed only in the surgically treated patients (mean 1.1 ± 1.2 days). During the early follow-up, morbidity rate was 7/14 in surgically treated patients vs. 1/13 in endovascular group; it included bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, arterial thrombosis and bowel obstruction. The discharge imaging showed complete aneurysm exclusion and renal artery patency in all cases.At a mean follow-up of 39 ± 42 months, 3 patients (11%) were lost to follow up and 2 (7.4 %) died from unrelated cause. None of these patients required dialysis but a statistically significant (P = 0.09) decrease in GFR was noted between the preoperative period and last follow-up control. RAA repair neither showed blood pressure control improvement nor reduced the need for anti-hypertensive drug use. Conclusion: Open or endovascular techniques are both safe and efficient to treat RAA. Even though, surgical management is burdened with higher morbidity rate, the operative technique should be selected according to anatomical features, diameters and location of RRA; and the number of renal branches involved. Further larger studies are needed to define the feasibility and safety for a wider application of the endovascular approach.

Contemporary Outcomes of in Situ Open Surgical Repair of Mid-Portion and Distal Renal Artery Aneurysms

The best management of renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) remains controversial, especially when they are located from the mid to distal portions of the main renal artery. Our aim is to evaluate our 10-year experience with in situ open surgical repairs from a cohort of non-proximal RAAs at a single vascular surgery center. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent RAA in situ repairs located from the mid to distal portions of the renal artery at our Institution was performed between 2009 and 2020. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, aneurysm location and morphology, type of in situ technique, and perioperative data were assessed. Postoperative biomarkers and renal function were collected, and mid-term follow-up results were analyzed. A total of 15 RAA located at mid and distal portions of the renal artery repaired with in situ techniques were performed in 15 patients (nine men, mean age 62.4 ± 6.36 years). At diagnosis, 12 patients were asymptomatic; a history of abdominal pain was found in one patient, and two patients had drug-resistant hypertension. Two patients had already undergone previous unsuccessful attempts of endovascular treatment. All patients presented an aneurysm diameter >20 mm (mean diameter 2.75 ± 5 mm). At admission, mean serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate were 1.10 ± 0.23 mg/dL and 69.8 ± 9.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Nine lesions were present in the distal portion of the renal artery, with 4 cases having ≥3 efferent branches and the other 5 with two efferent branches. The other six RAAs were in the mid-portion: in 4 cases, one efferent branch, and in 2 cases, two efferent branches were involved. All patients underwent in situ open repair: an end-to-end anastomosis was performed in 9 cases, aneurysm resection with primary closure in 3 cases, bypass with graft interposition in 2 cases (one iliac-renal reconstruction), and with vein interposition in 1 case. The mean renal ischemia time was 21.8 ± 9.4 min. A significant decrease on renal function was not observed (mean glomerular filtration rate at discharge: 64.8 ± 12.0 mL/min/1.73m2; P > 0.22). During recovery, one patient developed retroperitoneal hematoma treated conservatively. During follow-up (mean 46 months, range 2-135), one patient developed occlusion of a terminal renal artery branch without decreased kidney function. In situ techniques for RAA from the mid to distal portions of the renal artery are technically complex; however, based on our results, these procedures were safe and effective, providing satisfactory early and mid-term outcomes.

Ex vivo Repair of Renal Artery Aneurysm and Autotransplantation

This video describes our technical approach to open ex vivo repair of renal artery aneurysm, followed by autotransplantation of the kidney, in cases in which an in situ repair is not feasible. We discuss a pediatric case of a large renal artery aneurysm that was found in our patient with type I neurofibromatosis and successfully managed with preserved renal function.

Management and outcome of true visceral and renal artery aneurysm repair

PurposeVisceral and renal artery aneurysms (VAA, RAA) are very rare pathologies. Both surgical and endovascular therapies are discussed as therapeutic options for ruptured and non-ruptured aneurysm repair; we describe our experience in the open and endovascular management of these entities.MethodsRetrospective database analysis of 60 treated VAA and RAA in 59 patients between 1994 and 2020. Outcome data was descriptively analyzed.ResultsThirty-seven aneurysms were surgically treated and 23 interventionally. In the total study cohort, we observed a mortality of 1.7% and a morbidity of 18.6%. One major complication occurred. The morbidity was higher after surgical repair in ruptured and non-ruptured cases. The mean aneurysm diameter was 30.5 ± 15.6 mm. Patients with hepatic or pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysms presented more often in the stage of rupture, without differences in aneurysm size. The length of hospital stay after endovascular repair was significantly shorter compared to open surgical treatment (7.2 ± 6.9 days versus 11.8 ± 6.7 days, p = 0.014), but only in elective cases. Primary technical success was significantly better in patients that underwent surgical repair in an intention to treat analysis (100% versus 79.3%). The mean follow-up of the cohort was 53.5 months (range 3–207 months).ConclusionElective endovascular therapy and open surgery of VAA and RAA are safe procedures with a good periprocedural and long-term outcome. Surgical revascularization showed a better primary technical success but was associated with longer length of hospital stays.

Results of Surgical Repair of Hilar Renal Artery Aneurysm to Preserve Renal Blood Flow.

Objective: Surgical indications and procedures for hilar renal artery aneurysm (HRAA) are controversial in terms of invasiveness and feasibility. Catheter treatment is minimally invasive but leads to renal dysfunction due to renal infarction. This study aims to investigate the results of surgical repair of HRAA.Method: Fourteen patients (58.7±11.6 years old, 7 male) who underwent surgical repair of HRAA were retrospectively reviewed. Nine patients (64%) developed HRAA in the right renal artery, and the mean maximum aneurysmal diameter was 25.9±10.3 mm. HRAA was exposed via the extraperitoneal approach. HRAA was resected completely, and reconstruction of renal arteries was performed by direct closure in two, direct anastomosis in nine, and interposition of saphenous vein graft in three patients.Results: The average operation and renal ischemic times were 186±49 and 35±16 min, respectively. No operative death occurred, and postoperative renal function at the time of discharge had not deteriorated (creatinine, 0.74±0.15 mg/dl). During the follow-up periods (4.7±5.1 years), there was no death, no new introduction of hemodialysis, and no recurrence of renal artery aneurysm.Conclusion: Surgical repair of HRAA remains a valid option because of its operative safety, preservation of renal function, and long-term feasibility and patency.

Extracorporeal resection of renal artery aneurysm and separate autogenous vein graft repair of its branches in a patient with retroaortic renal vein

Autopsy and intravital studies have reported the incidence of renal artery aneurysms (RAA) in 0.01 to 0.97% of the population. Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) and atherosclerosis are the main etiological factors for the development of RAA. The presence of abnormalities of the veins such as a retroaortic renal vein can significantly complicate the implementation of surgical interventions. The main methods to treat RAA are RAA resection with prosthetic repair, embolization of aneurysm cavities, and placement of an endograph. When aneurysm spreads to involve the renal artery branches or RAA is located in the kidney gates, the extracorporeal renal artery reconstruction is the only method to restore the renal vessels and keep a kidney. The article provides a rare observation of a patient suffering from renal artery fibromuscular dysplasia, left renal artery aneurysm with the development of vasorenal hypertension. The features of this clinical observation were the retroaortic left renal vein and the renal artery aneurysm located in the kidney gates. The patient underwent ureter-sparing extracorporeal autogenous vein graft repair of left renal artery branches. The surgery was performed using custodial solution for kidney pharmaco-hypothermic protection. Renal artery aneurysm was resected with the creation of a common junction of the renal artery branches followed by autogenous vein graft repair. The two lower segmental branches of the renal artery were separately prosthetized using the reversed autovein sections. Parietal injury to the left ureter was diagnosed in the patient in the postoperative period. A percutaneous needle-guided urine drainage bag was superimposed under ultrasound guidance with the placement of an integral stent in the injury area. The patient was discharged to outpatient care on Day 11. The urine drainage bag was removed two months after the control CTA. The integral stent was removed a month later, normal urine output was restored in the upper urinary tract. After 6 months, the control CTA showed that all reconstructed renal artery branches were completely patent, and blood pressure readings were within normal range.

Distal Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair: “More than Meets the Eye”

Distal Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair: “More than Meets the Eye”

Surgical Renovascular Reconstruction for Renal Artery Stenosis and Aneurysm: Long-Term Durability and Survival

To study functional outcome, mortality, and dialysis free survival in patients undergoing open primary surgical repair of renal artery stenosis (RAS) or aneurysm (RAA). This was a retrospective single centre study of patients undergoing open surgical renal artery reconstruction from 1993 to 2007. Blood pressure, renal function, dialysis dependence, vessel patency, and mortality were registered. Survival was investigated by cross matching with the population registry, yielding up to 20 years of follow up. Of the 40 patients operated on, 25 (63%) were women. RAS was the indication for reconstruction in 31 patients; 23 had atherosclerotic aetiology (ARAS), and eight had fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). Nine patients had RAA. Patients with ARAS were older (p = .008), had more extensive peripheral arterial disease (p = .004), and inferior renal function (p = .003) compared with patients with FMD or RAA. In FMD and RAA, the right renal artery was affected in 13/17 (76%) cases, whereas in ARAS the disease was evenly distributed. In patients with ARAS, 15/25 (60%) stenotic renal arteries (two bilateral procedures) were managed by aorto-renal bypass, and 2/25 (8%) through ilio-renal bypass. In 8/25 (32%) endarterectomy was performed. In FMD, all but one patient underwent aorto-renal bypass. Early mortality was 2.5% (one patient with ARAS). One patient with ARAS required dialysis post-operatively. Systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced in patients with ARAS, from 180 mmHg (median) pre-operatively to 155 mmHg at one month (p = .003) and 160 mmHg at one year (p = .03). Need for medication decreased from three or more drugs to two drugs at one month (p = .01). In FMD, there was a similar tendency. Three patients underwent re-intervention for restenosis: two endovascularly and one by open surgery. The overall 5 year survival was 88%. Median follow up was 10.6 years. Open surgical renal arterial reconstruction was performed with low mortality, fairly low morbidity, and excellent durability. Open surgery should still be considered a therapeutic option in complex renal artery disease.

Surgical Renovascular Reconstruction for Renal Artery Stenosis and Aneurysm: Long-Term Durability and Survival

To study functional outcome, mortality, and dialysis free survival in patients undergoing open primary surgical repair of renal artery stenosis (RAS) or aneurysm (RAA). This was a retrospective single centre study of patients undergoing open surgical renal artery reconstruction from 1993 to 2007. Blood pressure, renal function, dialysis dependence, vessel patency, and mortality were registered. Survival was investigated by cross matching with the population registry, yielding up to 20 years of follow up. Of the 40 patients operated on, 25 (63%) were women. RAS was the indication for reconstruction in 31 patients; 23 had atherosclerotic aetiology (ARAS), and eight had fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). Nine patients had RAA. Patients with ARAS were older (p=.008), had more extensive peripheral arterial disease (p=.004), and inferior renal function (p=.003) compared with patients with FMD or RAA. In FMD and RAA, the right renal artery was affected in 13/17 (76%) cases, whereas in ARAS the disease was evenly distributed. In patients with ARAS, 15/25 (60%) stenotic renal arteries (two bilateral procedures) were managed by aorto-renal bypass, and 2/25 (8%) through ilio-renal bypass. In 8/25 (32%) endarterectomy was performed. In FMD, all but one patient underwent aorto-renal bypass. Early mortality was 2.5% (one patient with ARAS). One patient with ARAS required dialysis post-operatively. Systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced in patients with ARAS, from 180mmHg (median) pre-operatively to 155mmHgat one month (p=.003) and 160mmHgat one year (p=.03). Need for medication decreased from three or more drugs to two drugs at one month (p=.01). In FMD, there was a similar tendency. Three patients underwent re-intervention for restenosis: two endovascularly and one by open surgery. The overall 5 year survival was 88%. Median follow up was 10.6 years. Open surgical renal arterial reconstruction was performed with low mortality, fairly low morbidity, and excellent durability. Open surgery should still be considered a therapeutic option in complex renal artery disease.

Management of Visceral Artery Aneurysms with Preservation of Organ Perfusion: More Than Twenty Years Experience

Visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) are rare and often incidental findings. Indications for treatment are symptomatic patients, pseudoaneurysms and a true aneurysm of diameter of ≥ 2.5 cm for mesenteric arteries and ≥ 3 cm for renal artery aneurysms. Pregnancy and liver transplantation play an important role in aneurysm rupture. Technical success after open or endovascular procedure and maintenance of organ perfusion are crucial. The aim of this review is to evaluate our data and experience of more than 20 years and to develop a strategy to deal with visceral artery aneurysm in elective and emergency cases. Between 1995 and 2018, 179 patients (84 males, 95 females, median age 62 [18 - 87] years) were diagnosed with VAA at the Regensburg University Hospital. The site of aneurysm was the splenic artery in 113 (63%) patients (pts), hepatic and renal arteries in 22 and 21 pts (12% each), and gastropancreaticoduodenal artery in 14 (8%) and superior/inferior mesenteric artery in 9 (5%) cases. Surveillance without intervention occurred in 110 (62%) pts, and 34 (19%) pts underwent open and 35 (19%) endovascular repair. In all patients, preoperative imaging was performed, preferably by computed tomography angiography (CTA). A total of 69 patients underwent open or endovascular repair. 51 (74%) pts were treated electively, 18 (26%) pts presented urgently with acute bleeding. 16 emergency pts received endovascular treatment, and in 2 pts open surgery was performed. After emergency treatment, two pts exhibited segmental liver malperfusion without consequences. In one case, segmental bowel resection was necessary. 32/51 (63%) patients were treated electively by open surgery, 19/51 (37%) by endovascular procedures. There were no liver or bowel infarctions. Four splenectomies and one unilateral nephrectomy were necessary in patients with splenic or renal artery aneurysms. Moreover, three partial renal infarctions were noticed postoperatively (overall 8/21 [38%]). After endovascular repair of splenic or renal artery aneurysms, two cases of splenic and three cases of renal segmental infarction were observed. Splenectomy had to be performed twice (overall 7/14 [50%]). Organ perfusion was monitored by CTA, and preferentially by contrast enhanced ultrasound. The endovascular approach is the preferred option in an emergency to control bleeding in pseudoaneurysms. Patients for elective splenic or renal artery aneurysm repair have to be evaluated very carefully to achieve technical success with occlusion of the aneurysm and excellent organ perfusion. Imaging techniques such as ultrasound, especially CEUS, are strongly recommended in postoperative follow-up. Partial or complete splenic infarction leads to vaccination.

Repair of Complex Renal Artery Aneurysms by Bench Surgery with Angioplasty and Autotransplantation: Three Case Reports

Repair of Complex Renal Artery Aneurysms by Bench Surgery with Angioplasty and Autotransplantation: Three Case Reports

Open Repair of Renal Artery Aneurysm in Solitary Kidney

Open Repair of Renal Artery Aneurysm in Solitary Kidney

V06-05 ROBOTIC RENAL ANEURYSM REPAIR: USC EXPERIENCE

You have accessJournal of UrologyAdrenal, Testis, UTUC Oncology & More1 Apr 2018V06-05 ROBOTIC RENAL ANEURYSM REPAIR: USC EXPERIENCE Luis Medina, Giovanni Cacciamani, Andre Abreu, Akbar Ashrafi, Matthew Winters, Sameer Chopra, Carlos Fay, Karan Gill, Hannah Landsberger, Rene Sotelo, and Inderbir Gill Luis MedinaLuis Medina More articles by this author , Giovanni CacciamaniGiovanni Cacciamani More articles by this author , Andre AbreuAndre Abreu More articles by this author , Akbar AshrafiAkbar Ashrafi More articles by this author , Matthew WintersMatthew Winters More articles by this author , Sameer ChopraSameer Chopra More articles by this author , Carlos FayCarlos Fay More articles by this author , Karan GillKaran Gill More articles by this author , Hannah LandsbergerHannah Landsberger More articles by this author , Rene SoteloRene Sotelo More articles by this author , and Inderbir GillInderbir Gill More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.1584AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Renal artery aneurysm (RAA) is a rare clinical condition and is traditionally managed with endovascular techniques when treatment is indicated. There are few reports within the literature demonstrating minimally-invasive techniques for surgical intervention. We previously described the initial case of laparoscopic RAA repair. Herein, we report our experience of minimally-invasive RAA repair in six patients. METHODS Five patients had a complex RAA involving the main renal artery, and one patient had multiple aneurysms. Five patients underwent reconstruction robotically with one patient undergoing a robotic graft repair. RESULTS Median (range) aneurysm size was 2.4 cm (1.8-3.0). Median (range) operative time was 4.0 hours (3.5-6.0) with a median (range) warm ischemia time of 31.0 min (3-32). Median (range) estimated blood loss was 125 (50-400) and no patient required an intra-operative blood transfusion. Median (range) length of hospital stay was 3 days (2-6). At a median (range) follow up of 31.5 months (1-67), all patients report to be doing well with no post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS Our experience demonstrates that minimally-invasive techniques can be utilized to treat such rare cases as RAA. This study further advances the field. © 2018FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 199Issue 4SApril 2018Page: e662 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2018MetricsAuthor Information Luis Medina More articles by this author Giovanni Cacciamani More articles by this author Andre Abreu More articles by this author Akbar Ashrafi More articles by this author Matthew Winters More articles by this author Sameer Chopra More articles by this author Carlos Fay More articles by this author Karan Gill More articles by this author Hannah Landsberger More articles by this author Rene Sotelo More articles by this author Inderbir Gill More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...