Regulator Of G Protein Signaling Activity Research Articles

SymRK regulates G-protein signaling during nodulation in soybean (Glycine max) by modifying RGS phosphorylation and activity.

Molecular inter-species dialogue between leguminous plants and nitrogen-fixing rhizobia results in the development of symbiotic root nodules. This is initiated by several nodulation-related receptors present on the surface of root hair epidermal cells. We have shown previously that specific subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins and their regulatory RGS (regulator of G-protein signaling) proteins act as molecular links between the receptors and downstream components during nodule formation in soybeans. Nod factor receptor 1 (NFR1) interacts with and phosphorylates RGS proteins to regulate the G-protein cycle. Symbiosis receptor-like kinases (SymRK) phosphorylate Gα to make it inactive and unavailable for Gβγ. We now show that like NFR1, SymRK also interacts with the RGS proteins to phosphorylate them. Phosphorylated RGS has higher GTP accelerating activity, which favors conversion of active Gα to its inactive form. Phosphorylation of RGS proteins is physiologically relevant, as overexpression of a phospho-mimic version of RGS protein enhances nodule formation in soybean. These results reveal an intricate fine-tuning of the G-protein signaling during nodulation, where a negative regulator (Gα) is effectively deactivated by RGS due to the concerted efforts of several receptor proteins to ensure adequate nodulation.

Regulators of G-Protein Signaling (RGS) in Sporadic and Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common neoplasms worldwide. Among the risk factors of CRC, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is one of the most important ones leading to the development of colitis-associated CRC (CAC). G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) are transmembrane receptors that orchestrate a multitude of signaling cascades in response to external stimuli. Because of their functionality, they are promising targets in research on new strategies for CRC diagnostics and treatment. Recently, regulators of G-proteins (RGS) have been attracting attention in the field of oncology. Typically, they serve as negative regulators of GPCR responses to both physiological stimuli and medications. RGS activity can lead to both beneficial and harmful effects depending on the nature of the stimulus. However, the atypical RGS-AXIN uses its RGS domain to antagonize key signaling pathways in CRC development through the stabilization of the β-catenin destruction complex. Since AXIN does not limit the efficiency of medications, it seems to be an even more promising pharmacological target in CRC treatment. In this review, we discuss the current state of knowledge on RGS significance in sporadic CRC and CAC with particular emphasis on the regulation of GPCR involved in IBD-related inflammation comprising opioid, cannabinoid and serotonin receptors.

R4 RGS proteins as fine tuners of immature and mature hematopoietic cell trafficking.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest and most diverse group of membrane receptors. They are involved in almost every physiologic process and consequently have a pivotal role in an extensive number of pathologies, including genetic, neurologic, and immune system disorders. Indeed, the vast array of GPCRs mechanisms have led to the development of a tremendous number of drug therapies and already account for about a third of marketed drugs. These receptors mediate their downstream signals primarily via G proteins. The regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are now in the spotlight as the critical modulatory factors of active GTP-bound Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins to fine-tune the biologic responses driven by the GPCRs. Also, they possess noncanonical functions by multiple mechanisms, such as protein-protein interactions. Essential roles and impacts of these RGS proteins have been revealed in physiology, including hematopoiesis and immunity, and pathologies, including asthma, cancers, and neurologic disorders. This review focuses on the largest subfamily of R4 RGS proteins and provides a brief overview of their structures and G-proteins selectivity. With particular interest, we explore and highlight, their expression in the hematopoietic system and the regulation in the engraftment of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). Distinct expression patterns of R4 RGS proteins in the hematopoietic system and their pivotal roles in stem cell trafficking pave the way for realizing new strategies for enhancing the clinical performance of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Finally, we discuss the exciting future trends in drug development by targeting RGS activity and expression with small molecules inhibitors and miRNA approaches.

Residue-level determinants of RGS R4 subfamily GAP activity and specificity towards the Gi subfamily.

The structural basis for the GTPase-accelerating activity of regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, as well as the mechanistic basis for their specificity in interacting with the heterotrimeric (αβγ) G proteins they inactivate, is not sufficiently understood at the family level. Here, we used biochemical assays to compare RGS domains across the RGS family and map those individual residues that favorably contribute to GTPase-accelerating activity, and those residues responsible for attenuating RGS domain interactions with Gα subunits. We show that conserved interactions of RGS residues with both the Gα switch I and II regions are crucial for RGS activity, while the reciprocal effects of "modulatory" and "disruptor" residues selectively modulate RGS activity. Our results quantify how specific interactions between RGS domains and Gα subunits are set by a balance between favorable RGS residue interactions with particular Gα switch regions, and unfavorable interactions with the Gα helical domain.

Identification of Potential Modulators of the RGS7/Gβ5/R7BP Complex.

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins serve as critical regulatory nodes to limit the lifetime and extent of signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Previously, approaches to pharmacologically inhibit RGS activity have mostly focused on the inhibition of GTPase activity by interrupting the interaction of RGS proteins with the G proteins they regulate. However, several RGS proteins are also regulated by association with binding partners. A notable example is the mammalian RGS7 protein, which has prominent roles in metabolic control, vision, reward, and actions of opioid analgesics. In vivo, RGS7 exists in complex with the binding partners type 5 G protein β subunit (Gβ5) and R7 binding protein (R7BP), which control its stability and activity, respectively. Targeting the whole RGS7/Gβ5/R7BP protein complex affords the opportunity to allosterically tune opioid receptor signaling following opioid engagement while potentially bypassing undesirable side effects. Hence, we implemented a novel strategy to pharmacologically target the interaction between RGS7/Gβ5 and R7BP. To do so, we searched for protein complex inhibitors using a time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based high-throughput screening (HTS) assay that measures compound-mediated alterations in the FRET signal between RGS7/Gβ5 and R7BP. We performed two HTS campaigns, each screening ~100,000 compounds from the Scripps Drug Discovery Library (SDDL). Each screen yielded more than 100 inhibitors, which will be described herein.

"Disruptor" residues in the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) R12 subfamily attenuate the inactivation of Gα subunits.

Understanding the molecular basis of interaction specificity between RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) proteins and heterotrimeric (αβγ) G proteins would enable the manipulation of RGS-G protein interactions, explore their functions, and effectively target them therapeutically. RGS proteins are classified into four subfamilies (R4, R7, RZ, and R12) and function as negative regulators of G protein signaling by inactivating Gα subunits. We found that the R12 subfamily members RGS10 and RGS14 had lower activity than most R4 subfamily members toward the Gi subfamily member Gαo Using structure-based energy calculations with multiple Gα-RGS complexes, we identified R12-specific residues in positions that are predicted to determine the divergent activity of this subfamily. This analysis predicted that these residues, which we call "disruptor residues," interact with the Gα helical domain. We engineered the R12 disruptor residues into the RGS domains of the high-activity R4 subfamily and found that these altered proteins exhibited reduced activity toward Gαo Reciprocally, replacing the putative disruptor residues in RGS18 (a member of the R4 subfamily that exhibited low activity toward Gαo) with the corresponding residues from a high-activity R4 subfamily RGS protein increased its activity toward Gαo Furthermore, the high activity of the R4 subfamily toward Gαo was independent of the residues in the homologous positions to the R12 subfamily and RGS18 disruptor residues. Thus, our results suggest that the identified RGS disruptor residues function as negative design elements that attenuate RGS activity for specific Gα proteins.

Association with the Plasma Membrane Is Sufficient for Potentiating Catalytic Activity of Regulators of G Protein Signaling (RGS) Proteins of the R7 Subfamily

Regulators of G protein Signaling (RGS) promote deactivation of heterotrimeric G proteins thus controlling the magnitude and kinetics of responses mediated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). In the nervous system, RGS7 and RGS9-2 play essential role in vision, reward processing, and movement control. Both RGS7 and RGS9-2 belong to the R7 subfamily of RGS proteins that form macromolecular complexes with R7-binding protein (R7BP). R7BP targets RGS proteins to the plasma membrane and augments their GTPase-accelerating protein (GAP) activity, ultimately accelerating deactivation of G protein signaling. However, it remains unclear if R7BP serves exclusively as a membrane anchoring subunit or further modulates RGS proteins to increase their GAP activity. To directly answer this question, we utilized a rapidly reversible chemically induced protein dimerization system that enabled us to control RGS localization independent from R7BP in living cells. To monitor kinetics of Gα deactivation, we coupled this strategy with measuring changes in the GAP activity by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay in a cellular system containing μ-opioid receptor. This approach was used to correlate changes in RGS localization and activity in the presence or absence of R7BP. Strikingly, we observed that RGS activity is augmented by membrane recruitment, in an orientation independent manner with no additional contributions provided by R7BP. These findings argue that the association of R7 RGS proteins with the membrane environment provides a major direct contribution to modulation of their GAP activity.

RGS proteins as targets in the treatment of intestinal inflammation and visceral pain: New insights and future perspectives

Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins provide timely termination of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) responses. Serving as a central control point in GPCR signaling cascades, RGS proteins are promising targets for drug development. In this review, we discuss the involvement of RGS proteins in the pathophysiology of the gastrointestinal inflammation and their potential to become a target for anti-inflammatory drugs. Specifically, we evaluate the emerging evidence for modulation of selected receptor families: opioid, cannabinoid and serotonin by RGS proteins. We discuss how the regulation of RGS protein level and activity may modulate immunological pathways involved in the development of intestinal inflammation. Finally, we propose that RGS proteins may serve as a prognostic factor for survival rate in colorectal cancer. The ideas introduced in this review set a novel conceptual framework for the utilization of RGS proteins in the treatment of gastrointestinal inflammation, a growing major concern worldwide.

Abstract 365: Domain-specific Roles for GRK2 in Cardiac Hypertrophy and Heart Failure

During heart failure (HF), cardiac levels and activity of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinase (GRK) GRK2 are elevated and contribute to adverse remodeling and contractile dysfunction, while inhibition via a carboxyl-terminal peptide, βARKct, enhances heart function and can prevent HF development. Mounting evidence supports the idea of a dynamic “interactome” in which GRK2 can uncouple GPCRs via novel protein-protein interactions. Several GRK2 interacting partners are important for adaptive and maladaptive myocyte growth; therefore, an understanding of domain-specific interactions with signaling and regulatory molecules could lead to novel targets for HF therapy. For instance, GRK2 contains a putative amino-terminal Regulator of G protein Signaling (RGS) domain (βARK-RGS) that directly interacts with Gq and appears to inhibit signaling without altering Gq enzymatic activity. Previously, our lab investigated cardiac-specific transgenic (Tg) expression of a fragment of this RGS domain (βARKnt). This fragment did not alter acute hypertrophy after pressure overload or demonstrate RGS activity in vivo against Gq-mediated signaling. In contrast, βARKnt induced hypertrophy and elevated β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) density without altering agonist-induced contractility or adenylyl cyclase activity, due to a compensatory increase in GRK2 activity. Importantly, though, βAR downregulation in response to chronic agonist administration was attenuated by βARKnt expression, indicating a novel regulation of βAR receptor density. Given these findings we have recently investigated the effect of βARKnt expression during chronic pressure overload post trans-aortic constriction (TAC). Echocardiographic analysis revealed increased posterior wall thickness and left-ventricular mass 4 weeks post-TAC compared to non-transgenic littermate controls (NLC). Importantly, despite enhanced hypertrophy, the progression to HF was inhibited in βARKnt mice 14 weeks post-TAC (%LV Ejection Fraction of 36.1 ± 0.2 in NLC versus 56.6 ± 0.9 in Tg mice). While mechanistic characterization is underway, these data indicate that βARKnt-mediated regulation of βAR density may provide a novel means of cardioprotection during pressure-overload induced HF.

RGS Proteins and Septins Cooperate to Promote Chemotropism by Regulating Polar Cap Mobility

Septins are well known to form a boundary between mother and daughter cells in mitosis, but their role in other morphogenic states is poorly understood. Using microfluidics and live-cell microscopy, coupled with new computational methods for image analysis, we investigated septin function during pheromone-dependent chemotropic growth in yeast. We show that septins colocalize with the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) Sst2, a GTPase-activating protein that dampens pheromone receptor signaling. We show further that the septin structure surrounds the polar cap, ensuring that cell growth is directed toward the source of pheromone. When RGS activity is abrogated, septins are partially disorganized. Under these circumstances, the polar cap travels toward septin structures and away from sites of exocytosis, resulting in a loss of gradient tracking. Septin organization is dependent on RGS protein activity. When assembled correctly, septins promote turning of the polar cap and proper tracking of a pheromone gradient.

A Physiologically Required G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR)-Regulator of G Protein Signaling (RGS) Interaction That Compartmentalizes RGS Activity

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can interact with regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins. However, the effects of such interactions on signal transduction and their physiological relevance have been largely undetermined. Ligand-bound GPCRs initiate by promoting exchange of GDP for GTP on the Gα subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins. Signaling is terminated by hydrolysis of GTP to GDP through intrinsic GTPase activity of the Gα subunit, a reaction catalyzed by RGS proteins. Using yeast as a tool to study GPCR signaling in isolation, we define an interaction between the cognate GPCR (Mam2) and RGS (Rgs1), mapping the interaction domains. This reaction tethers Rgs1 at the plasma membrane and is essential for physiological signaling response. In vivo quantitative data inform the development of a kinetic model of the GTPase cycle, which extends previous attempts by including GPCR-RGS interactions. In vivo and in silico data confirm that GPCR-RGS interactions can impose an additional layer of regulation through mediating RGS subcellular localization to compartmentalize RGS activity within a cell, thus highlighting their importance as potential targets to modulate GPCR signaling pathways.

A High Throughput Screen for RGS Proteins Using Steady State Monitoring of Free Phosphate Formation

G-protein coupled receptors are a diverse group that are the target of over 50% of marketed drugs. Activation of these receptors results in the exchange of bound GDP for GTP in the Gα subunit of the heterotrimeric G-protein. The Gα subunit dissociates from the β/γ subunits and both proceed to affect downstream signaling targets. The signal terminates by the hydrolysis of GTP to GDP and is temporally regulated by Regulators of G-protein Signaling (RGS) proteins that act as GTPase Activating Proteins (GAPs). This makes RGS proteins potentially desirable targets for “tuning” the effects of current therapies as well as developing novel pharmacotherapies. Current methods for evaluating RGS activity depend on laborious and/or expensive techniques. In this study we developed a simple and inexpensive assay for the steady state analysis of RGS protein GAP activity, using RGS4, RGS8 and RGS17 as models. Additionally, we report the use of RGS4 as a model for high throughput assay development. After initial setup, this assay can be conducted in a highly parallel fashion with a read time of less than 8 minutes for a 1536-well plate. The assay exhibited a robust Z-factor of 0.6 in a 1536-well plate. We conducted a pilot screen for inhibitors using a small, 2320 compound library. From this screen, 13 compounds were identified as compounds for further analysis. The successful development of this assay for high-throughput screening provides a low cost, high speed, simple method for assessing RGS protein activity.

Integrating energy calculations with functional assays to decipher the specificity of G protein–RGS protein interactions

The diverse RGS protein family is responsible for the precise timing of G-protein signaling. To understand how RGS protein structure encodes their common ability to inactivate G-proteins and their selective G-protein recognition, we integrated structure-based energy calculations with biochemical measurements of RGS protein activity. We revealed that, in addition to previously identified conserved residues, RGS proteins contain another group of variable modulatory residues, which reside at the periphery of the RGS-domain–G-protein interface and fine-tune G-protein recognition. Mutations of modulatory residues in high-activity RGS proteins impaired RGS function, whereas redesign of low-activity RGS proteins in critical modulatory positions yielded complete gain-of-function. Therefore, RGS proteins combine a conserved core interface with peripheral modulatory residues to selectively optimize G-protein recognition and inactivation. Finally, we show that our quantitative framework for analyzing protein-protein interactions can be extended to analyze interaction specificity across other large protein families.

A Nanomolar-Potency Small Molecule Inhibitor of Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Proteins

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins are potent negative modulators of signal transduction through G-protein-coupled receptors. They function by binding to activated (GTP-bound) Gα subunits and accelerating the rate of GTP hydrolysis. Modulation of RGS activity by small molecules is an attractive mechanism for fine-tuning GPCR signaling for therapeutic and research purposes. Here we describe the pharmacologic properties and mechanism of action of CCG-50014, the most potent small molecule RGS inhibitor to date. It has an IC(50) for RGS4 of 30 nM and is >20-fold selective for RGS4 over other RGS proteins. CCG-50014 binds covalently to the RGS, forming an adduct on two cysteine residues located in an allosteric regulatory site. It is not a general cysteine alkylator as it does not inhibit activity of the cysteine protease papain at concentrations >3000-fold higher than those required to inhibit RGS4 function. It is also >1000-fold more potent as an RGS4 inhibitor than are the cysteine alkylators N-ethylmaleimide and iodoacetamide. Analysis of the cysteine reactivity of the compound shows that compound binding to Cys(107) in RGS8 inhibits Gα binding in a manner that can be reversed by cleavage of the compound-RGS disulfide bond. If the compound reacts with Cys(160) in RGS8, the adduct induces RGS denaturation, and activity cannot be restored by removal of the compound. The high potency and good selectivity of CCG-50014 make it a useful tool for studying the functional roles of RGS4.

RSBP-1 is a membrane-targeting subunit required by the Galpha(q)-specific but not the Galpha(o)-specific R7 regulator of G protein signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins inhibit G protein signaling by activating Galpha GTPase activity, but the mechanisms that regulate RGS activity are not well understood. The mammalian R7 binding protein (R7BP) can interact with all members of the R7 family of RGS proteins, and palmitoylation of R7BP can target R7 RGS proteins to the plasma membrane in cultured cells. However, whether endogenous R7 RGS proteins in neurons require R7BP or membrane localization for function remains unclear. We have identified and knocked out the only apparent R7BP homolog in Caenorhabditis elegans, RSBP-1. Genetic studies show that loss of RSBP-1 phenocopies loss of the R7 RGS protein EAT-16, but does not disrupt function of the related R7 RGS protein EGL-10. Biochemical analyses find that EAT-16 coimmunoprecipitates with RSBP-1 and is predominantly plasma membrane-associated, whereas EGL-10 does not coimmunoprecipitate with RSBP-1 and is not predominantly membrane-associated. Mutating the conserved membrane-targeting sequence in RSBP-1 disrupts both the membrane association and function of EAT-16, demonstrating that membrane targeting by RSBP-1 is essential for EAT-16 activity. Our analysis of endogenous R7 RGS proteins in C. elegans neurons reveals key differences in the functional requirements for membrane targeting between members of this protein family.

N-Terminal Residues Control Proteasomal Degradation of RGS2, RGS4, and RGS5 in Human Embryonic Kidney 293 Cells

Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins modulate G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. The N termini of some RGS4-family proteins provide receptor specificity and also contain an N-end rule determinant that results in ubiquitylation and decreased protein expression. The relevance of these mechanisms to other RGS proteins is not fully understood. Thus we examined function, receptor specificity, and expression of R4 subfamily RGS proteins (RGS2, -3, -4, -5, and -8). Although the N terminus plays a key role in protein stability in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, we were unable to demonstrate specificity of RGS2, -3, -4, -5, or -8 for muscarinic receptors (M(1), M(3), and M(5)). However, cellular RGS activity (8 = 3 > 2) was strongly correlated with expression; RGS4 and -5 had minimal expression and activity. Stabilizing mutations of RGS4 and -5 (C2S) enhanced expression and function with a greater influence on RGS4 than on RGS5. We were surprised to find that a predicted destabilizing mutation in RGS8 (A2C) did not markedly affect expression and had no effect on function. In contrast, a destabilizing mutation in RGS2 (RGS2-Q2L) recently identified as a rare N-terminal genetic variant in a Japanese hypertensive cohort (J Hypertens 23:1497-1505, 2005) showed significantly reduced expression and inhibition of angiotensin II (AT(1)) receptor-stimulated accumulation of inositol phosphates. We were surprised to find that RGS2-Q2R, also predicted to be destabilizing, showed nearly normal expression and function. Thus, proteasomal regulation of RGS expression in HEK293 cells strongly controls RGS function and a novel RGS2 mutation with decreased protein expression could be relevant to the pathophysiology of hypertension in humans.

G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase and β-Arrestin-mediated Desensitization of the Angiotensin II Type 1A Receptor Elucidated by Diacylglycerol Dynamics

Receptor desensitization progressively limits responsiveness of cells to chronically applied stimuli. Desensitization in the continuous presence of agonist has been difficult to study with available assay methods. Here, we used a fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based live cell assay for the second messenger diacylglycerol to measure desensitization of a model seven-transmembrane receptor, the Gq-coupled angiotensin II type 1(A) receptor, expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. In response to angiotensin II, we observed a transient diacylglycerol response reflecting activation and complete desensitization of the receptor within 2-5 min. By utilizing a variety of approaches including graded tetracycline-inducible receptor expression, mutated receptors, and overexpression or short interfering RNA-mediated silencing of putative components of the cellular desensitization machinery, we conclude that the rate and extent of receptor desensitization are critically determined by the following: receptor concentration in the plasma membrane; the presence of phosphorylation sites on the carboxyl terminus of the receptor; kinase activity of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2, but not of G protein-coupled receptor kinases 3, 5, or 6; and stoichiometric expression of beta-arrestin. The findings introduce the use of the biosensor diacylglycerol reporter as a powerful means for studying Gq-coupled receptor desensitization and document that, at the levels of receptor overexpression commonly used in such studies, the properties of the desensitization process are markedly perturbed and do not reflect normal cellular physiology.

Psychostimulants, Madness, Memory... and RGS Proteins?

The ingestion of psychostimulant drugs by humans imparts a profound sense of alertness and well-being. However, repeated use of these drugs in some individuals will induce a physiological state of dependence, characterized by compulsive behavior directed toward the acquisition and ingestion of the drug, at the expense of customary social obligations. Drugs of abuse and many other types of experiences share the ability to alter the morphology and density of neuronal dendrites and spines. Dopaminergic modulation of corticostriatal synaptic plasticity is necessary for these morphological changes. Changes in the density of dendritic spines on striatal neurons may underlie the development of this pathological pattern of drug-seeking behavior. Identifying proteins that regulate dopaminergic signaling are of value. A family of proteins, the regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins, which regulate signaling from G protein-coupled receptors, such as dopamine and glutamate, may be important in this regard. By regulating corticostriatal synaptic plasticity, RGS proteins can influence presynaptic activity, neurotransmitter release, and postsynaptic depolarization and thereby play a key role in the development of this plasticity. Pharmacological agents that modify RGS activity in humans could be efficacious in ameliorating the dependence on psychostimulant drugs.

In Situ Hybridization Analysis of RGS mRNA Regulation and Behavioral Phenotyping of RGS Mutant Mice

To elucidate the functional role of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) in vivo, it will be critical to (i) determine how RGS activity is altered in response to a variety of manipulations and (ii) observe how the system is changed when RGS protein function is altered genetically. To facilitate studies of dynamic regulation of RGS protein activity, this article describes detailed methods for radioisotopic in situ hybridization for semiquantitative analyses of RGS mRNA abundances. Toward characterizing the functional differences in mice with genetically altered RGS activities, this article describes a subset of behavioral tests suitable for assaying sensitivities to drugs of abuse. These protocols should provide valuable guidance for investigators to establish these methodologies independently in their own laboratories and, over time, increase our understanding of RGS function in vivo.

Assays for G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Signaling Using RGS-Insensitive Gα Subunits

Regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins, by their action on Galpha(i/o) proteins, may enhance receptor-effector signaling by physical or kinetic scaffolding mechanisms. However, more than 30 mammalian proteins with RGS activity have been identified so it is difficult to determine which RGS protein is most relevant to a particular receptor system and in any particular cell. To avoid this problem, one approach is to examine agonist-stimulated second messenger signaling in cells expressing Galpha proteins that are insensitive to the GTPase accelerating property of all RGS proteins. This article describes protocols for the preparation and analysis of C6 rat glioma cells stably expressing RGS- and pertussis toxin-insensitive Galpha subunits; pertussis toxin treatment uncouples endogenous Galpha(i/o) proteins and allows for the determination of the expressed RGS-insensitive Galpha activity. Methods to determine signaling at the level of adenylyl cyclase, the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, and intracellular Ca2+ levels are described. As a typical G-protein-coupled receptor, we have used the micro-opioid receptor expressed in C6 cells together with RGS-insensitive Galpha(o). In these cells, agonist inhibition of adenylyl cyclase and stimulation of ERK1/2 phosphorylation were enhanced markedly. In contrast, increases in intracellular calcium were less affected. The altered signaling in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o) subunits allows for determination of the role of endogenous RGS proteins to limit and/or direct signaling.