Reducing Cocaine Use Research Articles

Influence of cocaine use reduction on markers of immune function

This study determined the effects of reduced cocaine use on immune function. Treatment seeking participants with Cocaine Use Disorder enrolled in a 12-week contingency management trial to reduce cocaine use. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to High Value Reinforcers (i.e., $55/negative urine sample) for cocaine abstinence (n = 41), Low Value Reinforcers (i.e., $13/negative urine sample) for cocaine abstinence (n = 33) or Non-Contingent Control (n = 33). Immune measures were collected at 6-week intervals. The High Value group had greatest use reductions, increased erythema and IL-6 and decreased IL-10 and CCL5, suggesting an activated immune response. Cocaine use reduction may promote changes in immune health.

Combined Use of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Its Healing Impact on Drug Abusers Who Are Addicted to Drugs: A Scoping Review

Aims: The aim of this study is to assist individuals in healing from addiction; it is essential to implement a combination of interventions, such as CBT, that are proven to be effective in treating drug abuse with a holistic approach that integrates psychological and social aspects for optimal results, according to empirical evidence. Methods: The search databases for this study were PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Identify articles published in the last 10 years (2014-2024), Randomized Control Trials (RCTs), English and Indonesian, Full-Text, and Teenagers to the Elderly. Using the PRISMA flowchart, data extraction and scoping with keywords (English): "Drug Addict OR Substance Abuse AND Cognitive Behaviour Therapy AND Dependence OR Substance-Related Disorder" and keywords in the Indonesian language "Pecandu Narkoba OR Penyalahguna Zat AND Cognitive Behaviour Therapy AND Ketergantungan OR Gangguan Terkait Zat." Results: The study found eight articles that met the criteria, the main findings showed the use of Modified Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (M-CBT) in enhancing recovery motivation among cocaine-dependent individuals. Interventions such as galantamine, C-CBT, and computer-based CBT also show promise in reducing cocaine use. Additionally, combining CBT with contingency management (CM) facilitates changes in neural activity related to cognitive control. CBT paired with MET+ABI+ATTI and Female-Specific CBT (FS-CBT) effectively addresses alcohol use in adolescents and women. Conclusion: This study highlights various CBT approaches that can be combined, such as M-CBT for cocaine independence and computer-based CBT, as well as the combination of CBT with contingent management that influences neural activity related to cognitive control.

Systematic Review of Cocaine-Treatment Interventions for Black Americans

Evidence-based drug-treatment studies that have shaped best practice in the United States demonstrate racial differences in effectiveness, with Black participants reporting worse outcomes compared with White participants. There are disproportionate cocaine-related overdose deaths affecting Black Americans, with limited information about interventions that serve them best. Culturally tailored treatment approaches, which incorporate participants’ salient identities and experiences, have shown effectiveness in meta-analyses. Thus, in this qualitative systematic review, we used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to identify both culturally universal and culturally tailored treatment-intervention studies that addressed cocaine outcomes among Black Americans. Four hundred two articles met initial criteria, 330 were reviewed by independent coders, and k = 30 treatment approaches are described in the article. Results indicate 72% of culturally tailored interventions were effective at reducing cocaine use compared with 47% of culturally universal interventions. Implications for provision and funding of effective cocaine-treatment interventions for Black Americans are critical to researchers, practitioners, and policymakers alike.

546 Using Contingency Management to Understand the Cardiovascular, Immune and Psychosocial Benefits of Reduced Cocaine Use: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Contingency management (CM) procedures yield measurable reductions in cocaine use. This poster describes a trial aimed at using CM as a vehicle to show the biopsychosocial health benefits of reduced use, rather than total abstinence, the currently accepted metric for treatment efficacy. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: In this 12-week, randomized controlled trial, CM was used to reduce cocaine use and evaluate associated improvements in cardiovascular, immune, and psychosocial well-being. Adults aged 18 and older who sought treatment for cocaine use (N=127) were randomized into three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: High Value ($55) or Low Value ($13) CM incentives for cocaine-negative urine samples or a non-contingent control group. They completed outpatient sessions three days per week across the 12-week intervention period, totaling 36 clinic visits and four post-treatment follow-up visits. During each visit, participants provided observed urine samples and completed several assays of biopsychosocial health. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Preliminary findings from generalized linear mixed effect modeling demonstrate the feasibility of the CM platform. Abstinence rates from cocaine use were significantly greater in the High Value group (47% negative; OR = 2.80; p = 0.01) relative to the Low Value (23% negative) and Control groups (24% negative;). In the planned primary analysis, the level of cocaine use reduction based on cocaine-negative urine samples will serve as the primary predictor of cardiovascular (e.g., endothelin-1 levels), immune (e.g., IL-10 levels) and psychosocial (e.g., Addiction Severity Index) outcomes using results from the fitted models. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: This research will advance the field by prospectively and comprehensively demonstrating the beneficial effects of reduced cocaine use. These outcomes can, in turn, support the adoption of reduced cocaine use as a viable alternative endpoint in cocaine treatment trials.

Bupropion does not show benefit relative to placebo for cocaine use disorder

A randomized trial has found that combining slow‐release bupropion (bupropion SR) with a financial incentive program was not more effective than placebo plus the incentive program in reducing cocaine use in patients with cocaine use disorder who also were receiving treatment for opioid use disorder. A subgroup of participants who had achieved abstinence early in the trial maintained high abstinence rates over the course of the study regardless of whether they were receiving bupropion or placebo.

Buprenorphine versus methadone for the treatment of opioid dependence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and observational studies

Opioid dependence is associated with substantial health and social burdens, and opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is highly effective in improving multiple outcomes for people who receive this treatment. Methadone and buprenorphine are common medications provided as OAT. We aimed to examine buprenorphine compared with methadone in the treatment of opioid dependence across a wide range of primary and secondary outcomes. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with GATHER and PRISMA guidelines. We searched Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO from database inception to Aug 1, 2022; clinical trial registries and previous relevant Cochrane reviews were also reviewed. We included all RCTs and observational studies of adults (aged ≥18 years) with opioid dependence comparing treatment with buprenorphine or methadone. Primary outcomes were retention in treatment at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, treatment adherence (measured through doses taken as prescribed, dosing visits attended, and biological measures), or extra-medical opioid use (measured by urinalysis and self-report). Secondary outcomes were use of benzodiazepines, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, and alcohol; withdrawal; craving; criminal activity and engagement with the criminal justice system; overdose; mental and physical health; sleep; pain; global functioning; suicidality and self-harm; and adverse events. Single-arm cohort studies and RCTs that collected data on buprenorphine retention alone were also reviewed. Data on study, participant, and treatment characteristics were extracted. Study authors were contacted to obtain additional data when required. Comparative estimates were pooled with use of random-effects meta-analyses. The proportion of individuals retained in treatment across multiple timepoints was pooled for each drug. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020205109). We identified 32 eligible RCTs (N=5808 participants) and 69 observational studies (N=323 340) comparing buprenorphine and methadone, in addition to 51 RCTs (N=11 644) and 124 observational studies (N=700 035) that reported on treatment retention with buprenorphine. Overall, 61 studies were done in western Europe, 162 in North America, 14 in north Africa and the Middle East, 20 in Australasia, five in southeast Asia, seven in south Asia, two in eastern Europe, three in central Europe, one in east Asia, and one in central Asia. 1 040 827 participants were included in these primary studies; however, gender was only reported for 572 111 participants, of whom 377 991 (66·1%) were male and 194 120 (33·9%) were female. Mean age was 37·1 years (SD 6·0). At timepoints beyond 1 month, retention was better for methadone than for buprenorphine: for example, at 6 months, the pooled effect favoured methadone in RCTs (risk ratio 0·76 [95% CI 0·67-0·85]; I·=74·2%; 16 studies, N=3151) and in observational studies (0·77 [0·68-0·86]; I·=98·5%; 21 studies, N=155 111). Retention was generally higher in RCTs than observational studies. There was no evidence suggesting that adherence to treatment differed with buprenorphine compared with methadone. There was some evidence that extra-medical opioid use was lower in those receiving buprenorphine in RCTs that measured this outcome by urinalysis and reported proportion of positive urine samples (over various time frames; standardised mean difference -0·20 [-0·29 to -0·11]; I·=0·0%; three studies, N=841), but no differences were found when using other measures. Some statistically significant differences were found between buprenorphine and methadone among secondary outcomes. There was evidence of reduced cocaine use, cravings, anxiety, and cardiac dysfunction, as well as increased treatment satisfaction among people receiving buprenorphine compared with methadone; and evidence of reduced hospitalisation and alcohol use in people receiving methadone. These differences in secondary outcomes were based on small numbers of studies (maximum five), and were often not consistent across study types or different measures of the same constructs (eg, cocaine use). Evidence from trials and observational studies suggest that treatment retention is better for methadone than for sublingual buprenorphine. Comparative evidence on other outcomes examined showed few statistically significant differences and was generally based on small numbers of studies. These findings highlight the imperative for interventions to improve retention, consideration of client-centred factors (such as client preference) when selecting between methadone and buprenorphine, and harmonisation of data collection and reporting to strengthen future syntheses. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Cocaine Use May Moderate the Associations of HIV and Female Sex with Neurocognitive Impairment in a Predominantly African American Population Disproportionately Impacted by HIV and Substance Use.

HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) remain a major challenge for people with HIV in the antiretroviral therapy era. Cocaine use may trigger/exacerbate HAND among African American (AA) adults, especially women. Between 2018 and 2019, 922 adults, predominantly AAs, with/without HIV and with/without cocaine use in Baltimore, Maryland, were enrolled in a study investigating the association of HIV and cocaine use with neurocognitive impairment (NCI). Neurocognitive performance was assessed with the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB). NCI was considered to be present if the fully adjusted standard score for at least two cognitive domains was 1.0 standard deviation below the mean. Although the overall analysis showed HIV and female sex were associated with NCI, the associations were dependent on cocaine use. Neither HIV [adj prevalence ratio (PR): 1.12, confidence interval (95% CI): 0.77-1.64] nor female sex (adj PR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.71-1.61) was associated with NCI among cocaine nonusers, while both HIV (adj PR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06-1.81) and female sex (adj PR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.18-1.98) were associated with NCI in cocaine users. HIV was associated with two NIHTB-CB measures overall. In addition, HIV was associated with a lower dimensional change card sort score (an executive function measure) in cocaine users and not in nonusers. Cognitive performance was poorer in female than in male cocaine users. The adverse effect of HIV on cognitive performance predominantly affected cocaine users. However, cocaine use may moderate the impact of HIV and female sex on cognitive performance, highlighting the importance of reducing cocaine use in NCI prevention among the AA population.

PP52 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation For The Treatment Of Cocaine Addiction: A Systematic Review

IntroductionLong-term cocaine use is associated with a wide range of cognitive deficits and neuropsychiatric pathologies. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging therapeutic strategy that stimulates the prefrontal cortex and may improve cognitive inhibitory control and decision-making. This systematic review aimed to evaluate and synthesize evidence on the safety, effectiveness, and cost effectiveness of rTMS for the treatment of cocaine addiction.MethodsA systematic review of the literature was carried out. The following electronic databases were searched to identify relevant studies published from inception to October 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials (nRCTs), case series studies, and full economic evaluations were included.ResultsA total of 12 relevant studies were identified, which included five RCTs, one nRCTs, and six case series studies. None of the studies reported data on cost effectiveness. The results indicated that rTMS reduces cocaine cravings and the number of doses consumed. No serious adverse effects were observed.ConclusionsThe ability to modulate the craving for cocaine in a specific way with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as rTMS, could be a new adjunct to the behavioral treatment of addiction, especially for cocaine use where there is currently no approved pharmacological treatment. Despite the low quality of the included studies, preliminary results indicate that rTMS may reduce cocaine use and cravings. In any case, since this effect is considered moderate, future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow up are required.

D-amphetamine maintenance therapy reduces cocaine use in female rats.

D-amphetamine maintenance therapy is a promising strategy to reduce drug use in cocaine use disorder (addiction). In both male rats and human cocaine users, d-amphetamine treatment reduces cocaine-taking and -seeking. However, this has not been examined systematically in female animals, even though cocaine addiction afflicts both sexes, and the sexes can differ in their response to cocaine. We determined how d-amphetamine maintenance therapy during cocaine self-administration influences cocaine use in female rats. In experiment 1, two groups of female rats received 14 intermittent access (IntA) cocaine self-administration sessions. One group received concomitant d-amphetamine maintenance treatment (COC + A rats; 5mg/kg/day, via minipump), the other group did not (COC rats). After discontinuing d-amphetamine treatment, we measured responding for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule, responding under extinction, and cocaine-primed reinstatement of drug-seeking. In experiment 2, we assessed the effects of d-amphetamine maintenance on these measures in already IntA cocaine-experienced rats. Thus, rats first received 14 IntA cocaine self-administration sessions without d-amphetamine. They then received 14 more IntA sessions, now either with (COC/COC + A rats) or without (COC/COC rats) concomitant d-amphetamine treatment. In both experiments, d-amphetamine treatment did not significantly influence ongoing cocaine self-administration behaviour. After d-amphetamine treatment cessation, cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine-seeking was also unchanged. However, after d-amphetamine treatment cessation, rats responded less for cocaine both under progressive ratio and extinction conditions. D-amphetamine treatment can both prevent and reverse increases in the motivation to take and seek cocaine in female animals.

High-risk Coronary Plaque Regression in Cash-based Contingency Management Intervention Among Cocaine Users With HIV-associated Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis.

Cocaine use exacerbates human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. We investigated whether cocaine abstinence or reduced use achieved with contingency management (CM) intervention would retard high-risk coronary plaque progression among cocaine users with HIV and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Between March 2014 and August 2017, 76 cocaine users with HIV and coronary plaques were enrolled in a study designed to decrease cocaine use and determine whether doing so impacted progression of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis as measured by coronary artery computed tomography examinations. Of the 76, 7 did not complete the study, resulting in 69 participants. A 12-month cash-based CM intervention was implemented to promote cocaine abstinence or reduced cocaine use. Generalized estimating equation approach was used to perform longitudinal data analyses. During the 12-month CM, all 69 participants reduced cocaine use, and of these, 25 (36%; 95% confidence interval, 25%-49%) achieved cocaine abstinence. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, generalized estimating equation analyses showed that (1) endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels, a proinflammatory biomarker for endothelial dysfunction, at the 6-month and 12-month visits were significantly lower compared with baseline ET-1 ( P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively), and (2) low-attenuation noncalcified coronary plaque volume, a predictor for myocardial infarction, at 12-month visit was significantly lower compared with baseline low-attenuation noncalcified coronary plaque volume ( P < 0.05). The findings of this study have not only demonstrated that CM is effective in achieving a sustained reduction in cocaine use, but also provided compelling evidence that reduction in cocaine use leads to quantifiable cardiovascular health benefits, including concurrent decrease in high-risk plaque burden and ET-1, among cocaine users with HIV-associated coronary atherosclerosis.

PPL-138 (BU10038): A bifunctional NOP/mu partial agonist that reduces cocaine self-administration in rats

The search for new and effective treatments for cocaine use disorder (CUD) is a priority. We determined whether PPL-138 (BU10038), a compound with partial agonist activity at both nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) and mu-opioid receptors, reduces cocaine consumption, reinstatement, and whether the compound itself produces reinforcing effects in rats. Using an intermittent access (IntA) cocaine self-administration procedure, we found that PPL-138 (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) effectively decreased the total number of cocaine infusions and burst-like cocaine intake in both male and female rats. Responses for food in an IntA model of food self-administration were not altered for either sex, although locomotor activity was increased in female but not male rats. Blockade of NOP receptors with the selective antagonist J-113397 (5 mg/kg) did not prevent the PPL-138-induced suppression of cocaine self-administration, whereas blockade of mu-opioid receptors by naltrexone (1 mg/kg) reversed such effect. Consistently, treatment with morphine (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg) dose-dependently reduced IntA cocaine self-administration measures. PPL-138 also reduced reinstatement of cocaine seeking at all doses examined. Although an initial treatment with PPL-138 (2.5, 10, and 40 μg/kg/infusion) appeared rewarding, the compound did not maintain self-administration behavior. Animals treated with PPL-138 showed initial suppression of cocaine self-administration, which was eliminated following repeated daily dosing. However, suppression of cocaine self-administration was retained when subsequent PPL-138 treatments were administered 48 h apart. These findings demonstrate that the approach of combining partial NOP/mu-opioid activation successfully reduces cocaine use, but properties of PPL-138 seem to depend on the timing of drug administration.

Modafinil does not reduce cocaine use in methadone-maintained individuals

IntroductionThere are no approved medications for the treatment of cocaine use disorder (CUD). Modafinil, a cognitive-enhancer with weak stimulant-like effects, has shown promise in initial studies as a treatment for CUD. Its potential efficacy has not been examined in individuals dually dependent on cocaine and opioids. MethodsThis study examined the efficacy of modafinil, in combination with contingency management (CM), for reducing cocaine and opioid use and improving cognitive function in methadone-stabilized individuals with opioid and cocaine dependence. We conducted a 17-week, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in which participants were randomized to one of four conditions: 1) modafinil + CM; 2) modafinil + yoked-control (YC); 3) placebo +CM; or 4) placebo + YC. Additionally, all subjects received platform treatments of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and methadone. While the original planned sample size was N = 160, a total of 91 participants were randomized. The two primary cocaine use outcomes were percentage of urine specimens positive for cocaine and percent of days of self-reported abstinence from cocaine during treatment. Cognitive function, opioid use, and secondary cocaine use outcomes were also considered. ResultsModafinil was well-tolerated with minimal reports of adverse effects. Modafinil was no more effective than placebo in reducing cocaine or opioid use or improving cognitive performance. ConclusionsIn the context of a trial with robust control conditions and platform treatments, these findings did not provide support for the efficacy of modafinil treatment for the treatment of CUD in methadone-stabilized individuals with dual opioid and cocaine dependence.

Promising outcomes from a cognitive behavioral therapy text-messaging intervention targeting drug use, antiretroviral therapy adherence, and HIV risk behaviors among adults living with HIV and substance use disorders

BackgroundTo date, no studies have reported the use of text messaging to deliver cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to people living with HIV and substance use disorders. ObjectiveWe developed and evaluated a 12-week, CBT-based text-messaging intervention (TXT-CBT) targeting drug use and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) for adults with HIV and comorbid opioid and stimulant use disorders. Materials and methodsParticipants were randomly assigned to receive either TXT-CBT (n = 25) or an informational pamphlet (INFO) discussing substance use and medication adherence (n = 25). ART adherence, drug use, and HIV-risk behaviors were assessed at baseline, monthly during treatment, and treatment-end, and were compared between groups using a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis. Injection drug use was examined as a moderator of outcomes. ResultsRelative to the INFO group, TXT-CBT participants evidenced increased ART adherence, measured by phone-based unannounced pill counts and biochemically by viral load and CD4 count. TXT-CBT participation was also associated with reductions in opioid use and HIV risk behaviors. While reductions in cocaine use were observed in the TXT-CBT group, relative to the INFO group, other stimulant use did not change. Among people who inject drugs, TXT-CBT produced increases in ART adherence and corresponding changes in viral load, relative to injection drug users in the control condition. ConclusionsFindings demonstrated promising preliminary evidence for the efficacy of TXT-CBT in improving ART adherence and reducing drug use and HIV-risk behaviors among people with HIV infection and comorbid opioid and stimulant use disorders.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Cocaine Addiction: A Systematic Review.

Long-term cocaine use is associated with cognitive deficits and neuro-psychiatric pathologies. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an emerging therapeutic strategy relating to changes in brain activity. It stimulates the prefrontal cortex and is involved in inhibitory cognitive control, decision making and care. This systematic review aims to evaluate and synthesize the evidence on the safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of rTMS for the treatment of cocaine addiction. A systematic review of the literature was carried out. The following electronic databases were consulted from inception to October 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science. Randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and case-series and full economic evaluations were included. Twelve studies were included. No identified study reported data on cost-effectiveness. Significant results of the efficacy of TMS have been observed in terms of the reduction of craving to consume and the number of doses consumed. No serious adverse effects have been observed. Despite the low quality of the studies, the first results were observed in terms of reduction of cocaine use and craving. In any case, this effect is considered moderate. Studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-ups are required.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ondansetron for the treatment of cocaine use disorder with post hoc pharmacogenetic analysis

BackgroundCocaine use disorder (CUD) has significant consequences and there remain no FDA-approved pharmacotherapies. Ondansetron is an indirect dopaminergic modulator that has shown efficacy in alcohol use disorder, particularly in phenotypic and genotypic subgroups, and was found to be efficacious in a pilot dose-finding trial for CUD. MethodsOne-hundred eight (108) adults with CUD were randomized to ondansetron 4 mg twice daily or placebo for 9 weeks and assessed up to thrice weekly to evaluate self-reported cocaine use and urine benzoylecgonine. Participants received cognitive-behavioral therapy and brief behavioral compliance enhancement therapy. Consenting participants (N = 79) provided blood samples for exploratory pharmacogenetic analyses. ResultsParticipants in both arms reduced cocaine use over time, but there was no statistically significant difference on percentage of cocaine-free days (PCFD; p = 0.972) or percentage of cocaine-free urine samples (PCFU; p = 0.909). Participants with early-onset CUD had greater improvement regardless of study arm (p = 0.002). Post hoc pharmacogenetic analyses demonstrated an interaction effect between treatment and rs1176713 SNP on PCFU in the total sample (p = 0.040) and African ancestry subset (p = 0.03). Constipation, fatigue, and somnolence were more common among ondansetron-treated participants (Fisher exact p < 0.05). Those who developed constipation were mostly rs1176713:GG carriers (Fisher exact p = 0.029). ConclusionsOndansetron did not demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of CUD. However, these preliminary results suggest a genotype-based variance in response to ondansetron in African ancestry individuals with CUD. Further studies are needed to validate findings for developing a personalized genomic approach for CUD treatment in racially and ethnically diverse populations.

Detecting change in psychiatric functioning in clinical trials for cocaine use disorder: sensitivity of the Addiction Severity Index and Brief Symptom Inventory

BackgroundAssessment instruments commonly used in clinical trials to measure functional outcomes in substance users may lack sensitivity to detect change during treatment, potentially limiting findings regarding benefits of reduced drug use. This study evaluated the sensitivity of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) to detect change in psychiatric functioning among cocaine users. MethodsData were pooled across five clinical trials for cocaine use disorder (N = 492) that included a 12-week treatment period and 6-month follow-up. Within-person cohen’s d′ was used to evaluate effect size of change on the Psychiatric Composite Score of the ASI (ASI-Psych) and Global Severity Index (GSI) of the Brief Symptom Inventory, as well as cocaine use. ResultsEffect sizes were larger for GSI than ASI-Psych from baseline to week 12 (GSI d′ = 0.59; ASI-Psych d′ = 0.16), and 6-month follow-up (GSI d′ = 0.48; ASI-Psych d′ = 0.10). For those with non-zero ASI-Psych at baseline (n = 252), medium effect sizes were found over the 12-week period (d′ = 0.53) and 6-month follow-up (d′ = 0.47). Effect sizes for change in days of cocaine use were most similar to GSI in either sample. ConclusionsThe ASI Psychiatric Composite Score may have limited sensitivity to detect change in psychiatric functioning among clinical trial participants who reduce cocaine use. It may be useful for detecting change amongst those reporting some psychiatric problems at the start of treatment. Future research should consider an instrument’s sensitivity to change when assessing the potential functional benefits of reducing cocaine use.

Pilot study of extended-release lorcaserin for cocaine use disorder among men who have sex with men: A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial.

ObjectiveTo determine if men who have sex with men (MSM) with cocaine use disorder (CUD) and actively-using cocaine could be enrolled and retained in a pharmacologic intervention trial of lorcaserin—a novel 5-HT2cR agonist—and determine the degree to which participants would adhere to study procedures.MethodsThis was a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study with 2:1 random parallel group assignment to daily extended-release oral lorcaserin 20 mg versus placebo (clinicaltrials.gov identifier-NCT03192995). Twenty-two of a planned 45 cisgender MSM with CUD were enrolled and had weekly follow-up visits during a 12-week treatment period, with substance use counseling, urine specimen collection, and completion of audio-computer assisted self-interview (ACASI) behavioral risk assessments. Adherence was measured by medication event monitoring systems (MEMS) caps and self-report. This study was terminated early because of an FDA safety alert for lorcaserin’s long-term use.ResultsEighty-six percent completed the trial, with 82% of weekly study follow-up visits completed. Adherence was 55.3% (lorcaserin 51.6% vs. placebo 66.2%) by MEMS cap and 56.9% (56.5% vs. placebo 57.9%) by self-report and did not differ significantly by treatment assignment. Intention-to-treat analyses (ITT) did not show differences in cocaine positivity by urine screen between the lorcaserin and placebo groups by 12 week follow-up (incidence risk ratio [IRR]: 0.96; 95%CI = 0.24–3.82, P = 0.95). However, self-reported cocaine use in timeline follow-back declined more significantly in the lorcaserin group compared to placebo (IRR: 0.66; 95%CI = 0.49–0.88; P = 0.004).ConclusionWe found that it is feasible, acceptable, and tolerable to conduct a placebo-controlled pharmacologic trial for MSM with CUD who are actively using cocaine. Lorcaserin was not associated with significant reductions in cocaine use by urine testing, but was associated with significant reductions in self-reported cocaine use. Future research may be needed to continue to explore the potential utility of 5-HT2cR agonists.

Clinical practice guideline on pharmacological and psychological management of adult patients with attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and comorbid substance use.

Substantial evidence has confirmed the high comorbidity between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and a substance use disorder (SUD). This review synthesizes the pharmacological and psychosocial interventions conducted in ADHD and SUDs, and provides clinical recommendations using the GRADE approach. Our results suggest: 1) In patients with ADHD and alcohol use, atomoxetine is recommended to reduce ADHD symptoms (weak recommendation) and alcohol craving (weak recommendation). 2) In patients with ADHD and cannabis use disorder, atomoxetine is recommended to improve ADHD symptoms (weak recommendation), not to reduce cannabis use (weak recommendation). 3) In patients with ADHD and cocaine use disorder, methylphenidate is not recommended to improve ADHD symptoms or to reduce cocaine use (weak recommendation). 4) In patients with ADHD and comorbid nicotine use disorder, methylphenidate is recommended to improve ADHD symptoms (weak recommendation). Psychoestimulants, such as methylphenidate or lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, are not recommended to reduce nicotine use (weak recommendation). 5) Regarding patients with ADHD and any SUD, the use of psychostimulants is recommended to improve ADHD symptoms (weak recommendation), not to reduce substance use (weak recommendation) or to improve retention to treatment (strong recommendation). In these patients, the use of atomoxetine is recommended to improve ADHD symptoms (weak recommendation), not to decrease substance use (weak recommendation) or to improve retention to treatment (strong recommendation). Atomoxetine and psychostimulants appear to be safe in patients with any SUD (strong recommendation). Our review suggests the need for more research in this area and for larger, multisite, randomized studies to provide more definite and conclusive evidence.

Use of sustained release dextroamphetamine for the treatment of stimulant use disorder in the setting of injectable opioid agonist treatment in Canada: a case report

BackgroundFor people with opioid use disorder who are not responding to oral opioid agonist treatment, evidence supports the effectiveness of injectable opioid agonist treatment with injectable hydromorphone (an opioid analgesic) and diacetylmorphine (pharmaceutical grade heroin). While this treatment is effective at reducing illicit opioid use, concurrent cocaine use is prevalent. Dextroamphetamine (a central nervous system stimulant) has been found to be a safe and effective treatment for cocaine dependence among people receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment in Europe. We present the first report of dextroamphetamine prescribing offered for the treatment of stimulant use disorder among a patient receiving iOAT outside of a clinical trial. This case report can be used to inform clinical practice in the treatment of cocaine use disorder, an area where interventions are currently lacking.Case presentationDextroamphetamine was prescribed to a 51-year-old male who was diagnosed with concurrent opioid and stimulant use disorder in an injectable opioid agonist treatment clinic in Vancouver, Canada. He reported smoking crack cocaine daily for more than two decades and was experiencing health consequences associated with this use. He presented to his routine physician visit with the goal of reducing his cocaine use and was prescribed dextroamphetamine for the treatment of stimulant use disorder. After 4-weeks the patient was tolerating the medication with no observed adverse events and was achieving his therapeutic goal of reducing his cocaine use.ConclusionsDextroamphetamine can be prescribed to support patients with stimulant use disorder to reduce or stop their use of cocaine. The case demonstrated that when dextroamphetamine was prescribed, a significant reduction in cocaine use was experienced among a patient that had been regularly using cocaine on a daily basis for many years. Daily contact with care for the opioid medication promoted adherence to the stimulant medication and allowed for monitoring of dose and tolerance. Settings where patients are in regular contact with care such as oral and injectable opioid agonist treatment clinics serve as a suitable location to integrate dextroamphetamine prescribing for patients that use illicit stimulants to reduce use and associated harms.

Reinforcing and Stimulant-Like Effects of Methamphetamine Isomers in Rhesus Macaques.

Monoamine releasers such as d-methamphetamine (d-MA) can reduce cocaine use in laboratory studies and have been forwarded for the management of cocaine use disorder (CUD). However, the proven abuse liability of d-MA has limited enthusiasm for clinical use. The levorotatory isomer of MA, l-MA, appears to have lesser stimulant effects, possibly due to its preferential norepinephrine-releasing properties compared with dopamine. The present study evaluated the abuse potential of l-MA by comparing its reinforcing effects with known stimulant drugs of abuse in nonhuman primates. Adult rhesus macaques (N = 4) responded for intravenous injections of cocaine, d-MA, methcathinone (MCAT), or l-MA under a fixed-ratio (FR) schedule of reinforcement; reinforcing effectiveness was evaluated using behavioral economic demand procedures. In a separate cohort (N = 9), daily activity and food-reinforced responding were assessed during 100 days of treatment with daily dosages of l-MA (2.3 mg/kg per day, i.v.) or d-MA (0.74 mg/kg per day, i.v.) previously shown to decrease cocaine self-administration. Results show that all drugs maintained self-administration, with peak injections reaching ∼100 inj per session for cocaine, MCAT, and d-MA and ∼50 inj per session for l-MA . In demand studies, self-administration of each drug gradually decreased as FR size increased. The exponential model of demand indicated that the reinforcing effectiveness of l-MA was significantly less than the other drugs studied. Chronic l-MA treatment did not appreciably alter daily activity and only transiently suppressed food-reinforced responding. These data, coupled with previous findings that l-MA effectively reduces stimulant self-administration, suggest that l-MA, or other norepinephrine-preferring releasers, may serve as agonist medication for CUD with lesser abuse liability than common psychostimulants. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Development of pharmacotherapies for cocaine use disorder remains a formidable challenge. Agonist-based therapies show promise, but enthusiasm is tempered by the abuse liability of previously proposed medications. This study evaluated the abuse liability and chronic treatment effects of methamphetamine's levorotatory isomer (l-MA). l-MA demonstrated lower abuse liability compared with commonly abused stimulants and produced few untoward effects. In the context of recent studies demonstrating that l-MA attenuates stimulant self-administration, these findings support l-MA's potential as a pharmacotherapy for stimulant addiction.