Redo Coronary Artery Research Articles

Redo coronary artery bypass grafting: when and how.

Redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains technically challenging with significant procedural risk but may be the best option for patients in whom repeat revascularization is indicated. This review summarizes the latest data regarding risk of redo CABG, who should receive this surgery, and how to achieve best outcomes. Over the past two decades, the risk of performing redo CABG has declined and is approaching that of primary CABG in the hands of experienced surgeons. Nonetheless, patients for whom redo CABG is indicated tend to be older and have more complex medical comorbidities. Preoperative imaging is paramount in guiding sternal re-entry and mediastinal dissection, and in how to best employ rescue strategies when needed. Patients with complex, progressive coronary disease with unprotected left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery disease and prior coronary bypass may benefit from the durable, complete revascularization that redo CABG can offer with internal thoracic artery bypass to the LAD and, when possible, arterial inflow to other important coronary targets. Preoperative imaging, careful planning, meticulous surgical technique, myocardial protection, and an experienced surgical team are critical for optimal outcomes.

Reverse-U Aortotomy (Kırali Incision) for Aortic Valvular Interventions.

Surgical incisional approach to the ascending aorta is the main strategic step during valvular and/or subvalvular aortic interventions. Classic aortotomy incisions (transverse or oblique) can be challenging and can cause suboptimal exposure of the aortic root especially for the patients with small aortic annulus or for redo coronary artery bypass patients with patent proximal grafts interposed to the ascending aorta. The Kırali incision was used in 91 patients (including 13 reoperations) who underwent an aortic intervention for valvular and subvalvular pathologies. Aortic root was exposed by forming inverted "U" shape incision starting from approximately 3 cm above the right coronary ostium toward the center of the noncoronary annulus and the top of the left-right commissure like a tongue. The aortic valve was replaced with a mechanical prosthesis in 45 patients and with a bioprosthesis in 39 patients including 14 sutureless and 16 stentless prostheses. A total of 29 patients received a concomitant procedure per the following: coronary artery bypass grafting on 8 patients and left ventricular assist device on 7 patients. There was no any problem related to aortotomy incision technique such as bleeding, rupture, dehiscence, or laceration perioperatively. There was no complication related to the procedure during 5-year follow-up. This new aortotomy incision technique is a safe procedure that provides good exposure for all kinds of aortic valve interventions and protects grafts and can facilitate aortic root enlargement or aortoplasty easily. This incision has the potential to be an alternative to traditional techniques.

Considerations on the Management of Acute Postoperative Ischemia After Cardiac Surgery: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Acute postoperative myocardial ischemia (PMI) after cardiac surgery is an infrequent event that can evolve rapidly and become a potentially life-threatening complication. Multiple factors are associated with acute PMI after cardiac surgery and may vary by the type of surgical procedure performed. Although the criteria defining nonprocedural myocardial ischemia are well established, there are no universally accepted criteria for the diagnosis of acute PMI. In addition, current evidence on the management of acute PMI after cardiac surgery is sparse and generally of low methodological quality. Once acute PMI is suspected, prompt diagnosis and treatment are imperative, and options range from conservative strategies to percutaneous coronary intervention and redo coronary artery bypass grafting. In this document, a multidisciplinary group including experts in cardiac surgery, cardiology, anesthesiology, and postoperative care summarizes the existing evidence on diagnosis and treatment of acute PMI and provides clinical guidance.

B-3 | Cardiovascular Outcomes of Redo-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Index Bypass Grafts Among Acute Coronary Syndrome: Regression Matched National Cohort Study

B-3 | Cardiovascular Outcomes of Redo-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Index Bypass Grafts Among Acute Coronary Syndrome: Regression Matched National Cohort Study

B-4 | Cardiovascular Outcomes of Redo-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Index Bypass Grafts Among Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) Patients: Regression Matched National Cohort Study of United States

B-4 | Cardiovascular Outcomes of Redo-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Index Bypass Grafts Among Non ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) Patients: Regression Matched National Cohort Study of United States

15-year outcomes of the JOCRI study (JOCRIED study): a randomised comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularisation.

The Japanese Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization Investigation (JOCRI) study reported a non-significant difference in early outcomes and graft patency between off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in 2005. The JOCRIED study aimed to review the long-term outcomes of the JOCRI study participants. The JOCRIED study enrolled 123 of the JOCRI study participants completing the clinical follow-up between August 2018 and August 2020; 61 patients in the off-pump group and 62 patients in the on-pump group. The follow-up period was 13.8 ± 2.8years. The groups were compared regarding mortality, the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and repeat revascularisation. The 15-year cumulative survival rate (off-pump vs on-pump, respectively; 77.7% vs 75.3%; p = 0.85), major adverse events-free survival rate (62.5% vs 55.6%; p = 0.27) and repeat revascularisation-free rate (84.8% vs 78.0%; p = 0.16) were not significantly different between the two groups. Revascularisation was the most common major adverse events in the JOCRIED participants. Although percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 8 patients (13%) in the off-pump group and in 14 patients (23%) in the on-pump group (p = 0.23), no patients underwent redo coronary artery bypass grafting. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides comparable 15-year outcomes to on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI.

Objective To review the evidence behind the role and relevance of redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the current practice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed to identify articles that discuss the practice of PCI and redo CABG in patients that require coronary revascularization. All relevant studies are summarized in narrative manner to reflect current indications and preference.Results The advancement in utilization of PCI has reduced the rate of redo CABG in patients with previous CABG that requires revascularization of an already treated coronary disease or a new onset of coronary artery stenosis. Redo CABG is associated with satisfactory perioperative outcomes but higher mortality at immediate postoperative period when compared to PCI.Conclusion Redo CABG patients are less likely to develop comorbidities associated with revascularisation, but the operative mortality is higher and long-term survival rates are similar in comparison to PCI. There is a need for further research into the role of redo CABG in the current advanced practice of PCI.

Long term safety and efficacy of the Yukon Choice Flex sirolimus-eluting coronary stent-a real-world data from India

In-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis are the major concerns while choosing a coronary stent. This single-centre, retrospective study evaluated the one and three-year clinical outcomes following implantation of Yukon Choice Flex (YCF) sirolimus-eluting stent. A total of 168 consecutive patients with 217 lesions underwent stenting with YCF stent. The presentation was with acute coronary syndrome in 158 (94%) patients. At 3 years, 9 (5.3%) patients died due to cardiac cause. Myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 10 (6%) and 4 (2.4%) patients respectively. Redo stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery was performed in 3 (1.8%) and 1 (0.6%) patient respectively. The use of YCF sirolimus eluting stent was associated with a favourable safety and efficacy profile at one and three-years of follow-up in a high-risk population.

A narrative review of redo coronary artery bypass grafting

A narrative review of redo coronary artery bypass grafting

Mid-Term Outcomes and Angiographic Patency of Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery

BackgroundWe evaluated the mid-term outcomes and angiographic patency of redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).MethodsOf 2,851 patients who underwent isolated CABG at Seoul National University Hospital from 2000 to 2017, 88 underwent redo CABG. Patients’ mean age at redo CABG was 66.0±8.0 years. The mean interval between the first-time and redo CABG was 113.0±62.4 months. The mean follow-up duration was 86 months. Early and mid-term clinical outcomes were evaluated. Angiographic patency rates were evaluated early (1–2 days), 1 year, and 5 years after surgery. Comparative analyses between on-pump and off-pump CABG were also performed.ResultsThe culprits for reoperation were previous grafts (65.6%), native coronary vessels (17.8%), and both (16.7%). Off-pump CABG was performed in 75 cases (85.2%), and the mean number of distal anastomoses was 1.8±0.8. The saphenous vein (39.7%) was used most frequently, followed by the right internal thoracic artery (28.4%), right gastroepiploic artery (21.3%), left internal thoracic artery (7.8%), and radial artery (2.8%). Operative mortality was 1.1%. The overall survival, cumulative incidence of cardiac death, and cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events were 71.3%,12.0%, and 23.3% at 5 years after surgery, respectively. The overall angiographic patency rates were 95.7%, 90.1%, and 92.2% on early, 1-year, and 5-year angiograms, respectively. The angiographic patency rates of saphenous vein grafts were 93.1%, 85.6%, and 91.3% on early, 1-year, and 5-year angiograms, respectively. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or angiographic patency rates were observed between the on-pump (n=13) versus off-pump (n=75) groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; p=0.005) and chronic kidney disease (HR, 3.85; p=0.001) were risk factors for all-cause mortality.ConclusionRedo CABG could mostly be performed using the off-pump technique and did not show increased operative mortality and morbidities.

Mid-Term Outcomes and Angiographic Patency of Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery

Mid-Term Outcomes and Angiographic Patency of Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Comparison between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery

Analysis of direct results of reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery

Aim. To compare the immediate results of treatment of patients after redo coronary artery bypass grafting (reCABG) off pump and with cardiopulmonary bypass.Methods. The retrospective study included 138 patients who underwent isolated reCABG for recurrence of angina pectoris in the period of 2013 to 2019 at the Almazov Research Centre. The operation was performed with cardiopulmonary bypass using isothermal blood cardioplegia in 74 cases (group A). Sixty-four operations were performed without cardiopulmonary bypass (group B). The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular event (e.g. myocardial infarction, acute cerebrovascular accident, cardiovascular death) during hospitalisation. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular failure, respiratory failure, renal failure, and wound healing complications during hospitalisation.Results. Redo CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass compared with CABG off pump was more often complicated by cardiovascular failure (39.2% versus 20.3%, p = 0.043), respiratory failure (7.8% versus 2.7%, p = 0.047), and postpericardiotomy syndrome (13.5% versus 0%, p = 0.047). The revascularisation index was higher in the group of reCABG off pump (2.9) compared to the group of reCABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (2.4). In the early postoperative period there was a decrease in the duration of inpatient treatment and stay in the intensive care unit, the duration of surgery, as well as a lower incidence of postoperative complications in group B.Conclusion. Redo CABG showed satisfactory results in the early postoperative period. Performing reCABG off pump was advantageous and was associated with a decrease in the incidence of postoperative complications. Received 23 June 2020. Revised 9 September 2020. Accepted 10 September 2020. Funding: The study did not have sponsorship. Conflict of interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest. Author contributions Conception and design: I.K. Ismail-zade, V.K. GrebennikData collection and analysis: I.K. Ismail-zade, D.G. Zavarzina, N.R. AbutalimovaDrafting the article: I.K. Ismail-zade, I.Yu. Ivanov, G.I. IshmukhametovCritical revision of the article: V.K. Grebennik, M.l. GordeevFinal approval of the version to be published: M.L. Gordeev, V.K. Grebennik, I.K. Ismail-zade, G.I. Ishmukhametov, I.Yu. Ivanov, N.R. Abutalimova, D.G. Zavarzina

Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Redo coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the evidence comparing the outcomes of off-pump with on-pump redo CABG. Studies were systematically searched and identified using PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) by two researchers independently. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, completeness of revascularization, blood transfusion rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stays. The 21 studies including 4,889 patients were enrolled in our meta-analysis. Compared with on-pump, the off-pump technique was associated with significantly reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.26-0.72, p = 0.001). Moreover, a notably decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.39-0.76, p = 0.0004) and incidence of post-operative new-onset atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury, low cardiac output state, blood transfusion rate (OR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.35-0.60, p < 0.00001; OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.38-0.78, p = 0.0007; OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.37-0.70, p < 0.0001; OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.20-0.47, p < 0.00001; OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.14-0.61, p = 0.001) and significantly shortened duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit and hospital stays (mean difference [MD] = -8.21 h, 95% CI = -11.74 to -4.68, p < 0.00001; MD = -0.77 d, 95% CI = -0.81 to -0.73, p < 0.00001; MD = -2.24 d, 95% CI = -3.17 to -1.32, p < 0.00001) could be observed when comparing the outcomes of off-pump with on-pump redo CABG. There was nonsignificant difference between off-pump and on-pump redo CABG in completeness of revascularization. In patients undergoing redo CABG surgery, the off-pump technique was associated with decreased mortality, less post-operative complications when compared to on-pump.

The impact of advances in percutaneous catheter interventions on redo cardiac surgery.

Toward the end of the twentieth century, redo cardiac surgery accounted for approximately 15-20% of total cardiac surgical volume. Major risk factors for redo cardiac surgery include young age at time of the first operation, progression of native coronary artery disease (CAD), vein graft atherosclerosis, bioprosthetic valve failure and endocarditis, and transplantation for end stage heart failure. Historically, redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone carried a mortality risk of around 4%. Factors such as older age, female sex, comorbidities, combined procedures, hemodynamic instability, and emergency procedures contributed to even higher mortality and morbidity. These poor outcomes made it necessary to look for less invasive alternate methods of treatment. Advances in catheter-based interventions have made a major impact on redo cardiac surgeries, making it no longer the first option in a majority of cases. Percutaneous interventions for recurrence following CABG, transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for calcific aortic stenosis, valve in valve (VIV) implantations, device closure of paravalvular leaks (PVL), and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for residual and recurrent aneurysms and mitral clip to correct mitral regurgitation (MR) in heart failure are rapidly developing or developed, obviating the need for redo cardiac surgery. Our intent is to review these advances and their impact on redo cardiac surgery.

Outcomes of Early Coronary Angiography or Revascularization After Cardiac Surgery

Early coronary ischemic events are uncommon after cardiac surgery, with little known about their management or associated outcomes. We evaluated clinical outcomes of patients undergoing coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention or redo coronary artery bypass grafting for suspected coronary ischemia within 3 weeks after index cardiac surgery. This is a retrospective observational study based on data from 53,287 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institution (1996-2017); 180 patients (0.34%) satisfied the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Statistical evaluation involved χ2, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier, and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Most coronary angiography ± percutaneous coronary intervention and redo coronary artery bypass grafting procedures occurred in the first 2 weeks after index cardiac surgery. Patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)/non-STEMI had the lowest 1-year mortality (13.5%), followed by patients with ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (28.1%), and patients with non-ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation arrest or hemodynamic instability alone the worst (38.6%) (χ2= 17.3, P= .001). Peak troponin T level after cardiac surgery was strongly predictive of 1-year mortality (area under the curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.84; P < .001) but did not predict the presence of coronary compromise. For acute graft failure, 1-year mortality was better with percutaneous coronary intervention (18.2%) than redo coronary artery bypass grafting (23.5%) or no indicated/feasible intervention (29.2%). Although suspected myocardial ischemia requiring coronary angiography or intervention early after cardiac surgery was rare, mortality was high, particularly in presentations other than STEMI/non-STEMI. In patients with overt signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia after index cardiac surgery, troponin T was not a reliable marker of underlying coronary or graft obstruction but was a robust predictor of 1-year mortality.

Mortality and Readmissions After On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

IntroductionLarge institutional and administrative datasets that have compared on pump versus off pump first time coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, comparison of off-pump vs on-pump outcomes in patients undergoing redo CABG are limited in current literature. MethodsAll patients who underwent redo CABG for coronary artery disease from 2011 to 2017 at our institution were included in the study. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with 5-year mortality and readmission. ResultsThree hundred and fifty patients underwent redo CABG; of which, 309 underwent on-pump CABG and 41 underwent off-pump CABG. Blood product transfusion (31.7% vs 58.9%; p = 0.001) and new onset atrial fibrillation (17.1% vs 35.6%; p = 0.018) were higher in the on-pump cohort. There was no difference in 30-day (2.4% vs 8.1%; p = 0.209), 1-year (4.9% vs 16.5%; p = 0.074), or 5-year mortality (31.7% vs 35.6%; p = 0.213) for off vs on pump redo CABG. There was no difference in 30-day or 1- hospital readmissions between groups. Five-year all cause readmissions (76.9% vs 55.3%; p = 0.037) was significantly higher in the off-pump redo CABG group. On multivariable analysis, on vs. off pump CABG was not significantly associated with mortality or readmission at 5 years. ConclusionThere was no short or long-term survival advantage for on-pump vs off-pump CABG despite risk adjustment. Hospital readmissions at 5-years were higher in the off-pump group.

Off-pump versus on-pump redo coronary artery bypass grafting: A propensity score analysis of long-term follow-up

ObjectiveRedo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with an increased early mortality reported up to 16%. The aim of this study was to analyze the early and long-term results after redo CABG with special focus on the feasibility and safety of the off-pump technique in the setting of a high-volume off-pump CABG center. MethodsFrom January 2006 to June 2015, isolated redo CABG was performed in 304 patients (179 = on-pump redo CABG, 125 = off-pump redo CABG). We used propensity score matching with 14 preoperative variables to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics between the on-pump redo CABG and the off-pump redo CABG groups. After 1:1 matching we selected 108 pairs for each group. Mean follow-up rate was 4.01 years. ResultsThe final sample was 83.9% men (n = 225) with a mean age of 69.77 ± 8 years. After propensity score matching there was a significant difference in the total number of grafts performed in favor of on-pump redo CABG (P = .011), whereas 66.7% (72 out of 108) of off-pump redo CABG patients received total arterial grafts. Off-pump redo CABG patients had a lower rate of postoperative renal failure necessitating dialysis (4.6% vs 0%; P = .06), required less recovery time in the intensive care unit (1.33 ± 1.03 days vs 4.4 ± 7.98 days; P < .001) and were discharged more quickly (10.08 ± 5.35 days vs 14.1 ± 10.6 days; P = .001). Off-pump redo CABG led to better long-term survival (log-rank test, P = .086). ConclusionsIn our study, patients undergoing off-pump redo CABG had fewer postoperative complications, achieved faster recovery, and had better long-term survival. Hence, off-pump redo CABG is safe and feasible.

Risk Factors and Outcomes in Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo-CABG) has declined during the last decade, while use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate risk factors, in-hospital mortality, and long-term survival between first-time CABG and redo-CABG. From January 2009 to December 2015, 2,581 patients underwent first-time CABG procedures while 132 underwent isolated redo-CABG. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors predictive of redo-CABG and after propensity matching the in-hospital morbidity and long-term all-cause mortality were compared. Risk factors for redo-CABG were prior PCI, dyslipidaemia, diabetes and hypertension. After propensity matching there were no significant differences between the redo-CABG (n = 126) and first-time CABG groups (n = 232) in baseline characteristics. The adjusted in-hospital mortality was 3.1% for redo-CABG and 2.1% for first-time CABG (p = 0.55). Redo-CABG required significantly more intraoperative red blood cells (p = 0.03), platelets (p < 0.001), cryoprecipitate (p < 0.007) and fresh frozen plasma (p < 0.001) than first-time CABG. There was no significant difference in reoperation for bleeding (p = 0.72), prolonged ventilation (p = 0.98), postoperative stroke (p = 0.92) or dialysis (p = 0.44). The survival at 1, 3 and 5 years for redo-CABG was 93.5%, 90%, and 85% respectively, and 95.5%, 94.5%, 93% for first-time CABG, respectively (p = 0.2). Prior PCI after first time CABG and the risk factors for atherosclerotic disease are predictive for redo-CABG. An increased use of blood products is required during redo-CABG. After propensity matching, in-hospital mortality and long-term survival for redo-CABG is comparable to first-time operation. Re-sternotomy does not impact the survival in redo-CABG.

The 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization still does not address the issue of disease-free saphenous vein grafts at the time of redo coronary artery bypass grafting.

The 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization still does not address the issue of disease-free saphenous vein grafts at the time of redo coronary artery bypass grafting.

Are component endpoints equal? A preference study into the practice of composite endpoints in clinical trials.

ObjectivesTo examine patients’ perspectives regarding composite endpoints and the utility patients put on possible adverse outcomes of revascularization procedures.DesignIn the PRECORE study, a stated preference elicitation method Best‐Worst Scaling (BWS) was used to determine patient preference for 8 component endpoints (CEs): need for redo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 1 year, minor stroke with symptoms <24 hours, minor myocardial infarction (MI) with symptoms <3 months, recurrent angina pectoris, need for redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within 1 year, major MI causing permanent disability, major stroke causing permanent disability and death within 24 hours.SettingA tertiary PCI/CABG centre.ParticipantsOne hundred and sixty patients with coronary artery disease who underwent PCI or CABG.Main outcome measuresImportance weights (IWs).ResultsPatients considered need for redo PCI within 1 year (IW: 0.008), minor stroke with symptoms <24 hours (IW: 0.017), minor MI with symptoms <3 months (IW: 0.027), need for redo CABG within 1 year (IW: 0.119), recurrent angina pectoris (IW: 0.300) and major MI causing permanent disability (IW: 0.726) less severe than death within 24 hours (IW: 1.000). Major stroke causing permanent disability was considered worse than death within 24 hours (IW: 1.209). Ranking of CEs and the relative values attributed to the CEs differed among subgroups based on gender, age and educational level.ConclusionPatients attribute different weight to individual CEs. This has significant implications for the interpretation of clinical trial data.