Rates Of Developmental Screening Research Articles

Standardizing and Improving Primary Care-Based Electronic Developmental Screening for Young Children in Federally Qualified Health Center Clinics.

Many barriers to implementation of developmental screening in primary care exist, especially for children from under-resourced communities. Developmental screening is vital to early detection of developmental delay and autism spectrum disorder, and early intervention (EI) referral. This study sought to examine whether implementation of a standardized clinical workflow using electronic screening tools improved both rates of developmental screening, and the number of children identified at risk for developmental delay, in a federally qualified health center (FQHC). A retrospective study was conducted at an academic-affiliated FQHC. Electronic versions of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3 (ASQ-3) and Modified Checklist in Autism for Toddlers Revised (M-CHAT-R) were implemented at well-child visits. New clinical workflow training on developmental screening and EI referral was provided. Chi-square and Fisher's Exact analyses were conducted. ASQ-3 screening rates increased from 62.7 to 73.6% pre- to post-intervention. Post-intervention, there was a significant decrease in paper screens (p < .001), and a significant increase in the percentage of children with ASQ-3 results in the below cutoff range from 14.7 to 18.2% (p < .002). M-CHAT-R screening rates increased from 56.4 to 59.4% pre- to post-intervention. Post-intervention, there was a significant increase in electronic screens (p < .001). Implementation of electronic screening tools improved universal developmental screening in a FQHC. To decrease barriers in under-resourced communities, the use of electronic tools may decrease the rate of screening error seen with paper screening and have the potential to better identify children at risk for developmental delay.

Improving Developmental Screening and Supporting Families with Paid Parent Partners.

The primary goals of the project were to improve rates of developmental screening and appropriate referral for atypical screens for children from birth to 3 years in participating practices and to integrate parent partners (PPs) into primary care. Parents' Place of Maryland, in collaboration with the Maryland Department of Health, developed a quality improvement project to improve rates of developmental screening, referral, and follow-up. Nine practices from across the state completed the project. Participating practices received training and technical assistance for screening, referral, and data collection as well as a paid part-time PP to assist with care coordination. Families of children with atypical developmental screening results were offered a referral to receive support in following through with referrals, including needed social services to address health care barriers. Developmental screening rates across practices increased from 65% to 95% during the 9-month project, and autism-specific screening increased from 75% to 94%. Appropriate referral rates tripled from 6% to 20% of children. After an initial learning curve, practices gradually increased referrals to PPs, and they served 292 individual families (total of 544 contacts) over 9 months. PPs helped families identify a variety of community services to meet their needs. While developmental screening rates can be improved using quality improvement processes, supporting families to connect to services requires additional resources. Integrating trained PPs into pediatric practices improves access to community-based services in a cost-efficient manner. More research is needed to identify the most efficient models for providing this service on a broader scale.

ECHO Autism: Integrating Maintenance of Certification with Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes Improves Developmental Screening.

Recent estimates indicate that most pediatricians do not consistently meet the American Academy of Pediatrics developmental screening guidelines, contributing to the delay of vital evaluations and interventions for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Our objective was to evaluate the utility of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Quality Improvement (QI) training designed to improve developmental screening rates in underserved, rural primary care practices. Trainings on best screening practices were disseminated to primary care providers (PCPs) through Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Autism, a virtual learning network. Across 2 cohorts, 24 PCPs were enrolled in MOC Part 4 training modules delivered through the ECHO Autism QI Learning Network. Throughout the 12 months of enrollment, PCPs reported information on general and ASD-specific developmental screenings conducted at 18- and 24-month well-child visits. A 1-year follow-up was conducted to assess the maintenance of screening rates. Baseline rates for general and ASD-specific developmental screenings were 53.3% and 68.3%, respectively. By the end of the 12-month learning module, screening rates increased significantly for general development (88.6%) and ASD-specific screenings (99.0%). At the 1-year follow-up, the rate for general developmental screening was 96.7% and for ASD-specific screening was 97.1%. Maintenance of Certification Part 4 training delivered through the ECHO Autism QI Learning Network was found to be incentivizing and highly effective in shaping and maintaining PCP developmental screening practices. Improved screening rates show promise in decreasing time to critical developmental evaluations, interventions, and resources. Our methodology is likely transferable to other ECHO communities and may facilitate expedient implementation of best practice standards in primary care.

Implementing mHealth Apps for Child Developmental Screenings: Opportunities and Challenges

Background: Clinical care guidelines for universal developmental screening are meant to identify at-risk children as early as possible so that early intervention can be initiated. However, despite years of initiatives, developmental screening rates remain less than ideal. Recent innovations in mHealth apps that integrate developmental screening may offer an alternate way to optimize screening rates if it can encourage co-use and seamless integration into clinical workflow. Objective: Prior to the planned deployment of a clinic-based mHealth developmental screening app, the research team sought to identify and characterize opportunities and challenges to implementation, focusing on clinic workflow and multi-stakeholder engagement with providers and parents. Methods: Three clinic settings were recruited to participate from one children’s hospital in Indianapolis, Indiana. Preimplementation clinical observations of workflow and team dynamics were performed. Potential adoption barriers and facilitators were explored through interviews with health care teams guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Parents with children aged 0-5 were recruited from study clinics and social media to complete a 26-item survey to gauge their attitudes towards using apps in place of paper screening forms and for tracking their child’s development. Results: Proposed implementation workflows were co-created with each clinical team so to not increase overall visit length, which was the main concern for health care providers. Providers had enthusiasm for use of mHealth tools; however, concerns were expressed about potential technology failures, data security and HIPAA and the workflow impacts. Two hundred fifty parents responded to the social media survey. The top reason for downloading child health apps were for a convenient way to track development (62.6%). Two-thirds of respondents expressed interest in an app that included developmental screening forms. Most parents prefer to complete screening tools on the day of the clinic visit (47.7%) or electronically prior to the visit (44.8%). Seventy-four percent of parents expressed a higher likelihood of using an app if recommended by the pediatrician. Conclusions: Parents and providers are interested and open to mHealth apps for child developmental screening. Provider buy-in and involvement in implementation planning is critical, both to integrating apps into clinic workflows and to encouraging parents to use the app.

Prevalence and Variation of Developmental Screening and Surveillance in Early Childhood

ImportanceSince 2001, the American Academy of Pediatrics has recommended universal developmental screening and surveillance to promote early diagnosis and intervention and to improve the outcomes of children with developmental delays and disabilities.ObjectiveTo examine the current prevalence and variation of developmental screening and surveillance of children by various sociodemographic, enabling, and health characteristics.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cross-sectional analysis of the Health Resources and Services Administration’s 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health—a nationally representative survey of US children completed between June 2016 and February 2017—examined 5668 randomly selected children 9 through 35 months of age whose parent or caregiver responded to the address-based survey by mail or via a website. All analyses were weighted to account for the probability of selection and nonresponse and to reflect population counts of all noninstitutionalized US children residing in housing units.Main Outcomes and MeasuresDevelopmental screening was measured through a validated set of 3 items indicating receipt in the past year of parent-completed screening from a health care professional with age-appropriate content regarding language development and social behavior. Surveillance was determined by an item capturing verbal elicitation of developmental concerns by a health care professional.ResultsOf the estimated 9.0 million children aged 9 through 35 months, an estimated 30.4% (95% CI, 28.0%-33.0%) were reported by their parent or guardian to have received a parent-completed developmental screening and 37.1% (95% CI, 34.4%-39.8%) were reported to have received developmental surveillance from a health care professional in the past year. Characteristics associated with screening and/or surveillance that remained significant after adjustment included primary household language, family structure, household education, income, medical home, past-year preventive visit, child health status, and special health care needs. Having health care that meets medical home criteria was significantly associated with both developmental screening (adjusted rate ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.13-1.57) and surveillance (adjusted rate ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.42), representing an 8 to 9 absolute percentage point increase. State-level differences spanned 40 percentage points for screening (17.2% in Mississippi and 58.8% in Oregon) and surveillance (19.1% in Mississippi and 60.8% in Oregon), with approximately 90% of variation not explained by child and family characteristics.Conclusions and RelevanceDespite more than a decade of initiatives, rates of developmental screening and surveillance remain low. However, state-level variation indicates continued potential for improvement. Systems-level quality improvement efforts, building on the medical home, will be necessary to achieve recommended screening and surveillance goals.

Caretaker Awareness of Health Care Provided Developmental Screening: Increases from 2007 to 2012.

Objectives Developmental screening is considered critical to identifying children with developmental delays and disabilities so that they may receive early intervention. To date, only a handful of studies report data on the percentage of health care professionals (HCP) who provide developmental screening. These reports are limited by low participation rates and reporters being pediatricians who may be biased towards reporting higher rates of developmental screening. The purpose of this study is to verify reported increases by reporting on changes in caretakers' awareness of HCP provided developmental screening from 2007/2008 to 2011/2012. Methods Authors report data on caretaker reported receipt of HCP provided developmental screening from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH, 2007/2008) and NSCH (2011/2012), as well as changes from the 2007/2008 to 2011/2012. Changes for the 50 states plus Washington D.C. are visualized using 'micromapST' and states are organized in ascending order according to changes in caretaker awareness of developmental screening. Results Nationally, the proportion of caretakers aware that their HCP provided developmental screening increased from 23.0% in 2007/2008 (range 12.6-46%) to 33.3% in 2011/2012 (range 19.4-61.6%) and states level changes ranged from -2 to +35%, with a median change of +10%. Conclusions for Practice Data reported here indicate that a greater number of caretakers are aware that their HCP is providing developmental screening. This reinforces the existing reports indicating increases in HCP reported developmental screening. Despite growth, there is still a need to increase developmental screening efforts in many states.

Use of a computerized decision aid for developmental surveillance and screening: a randomized clinical trial.

Developmental delays and disabilities are common in children. Research has indicated that intervention during the early years of a child's life has a positive effect on cognitive development, social skills and behavior, and subsequent school performance. To determine whether a computerized clinical decision support system is an effective approach to improve standardized developmental surveillance and screening (DSS) within primary care practices. In this cluster randomized clinical trial performed in 4 pediatric clinics from June 1, 2010, through December 31, 2012, children younger than 66 months seen for primary care were studied. We compared surveillance and screening practices after adding a DSS module to an existing computer decision support system. The rates at which children were screened for developmental delay. Medical records were reviewed for 360 children (180 each in the intervention and control groups) to compare rates of developmental screening at the 9-, 18-, or 30-month well-child care visits. The DSS module led to a significant increase in the percentage of patients screened with a standardized screening tool (85.0% vs 24.4%, P < .001). An additional 120 records (60 each in the intervention and control groups) were reviewed to examine surveillance rates at visits outside the screening windows. The DSS module led to a significant increase in the percentage of patients whose parents were assessed for concerns about their child's development (71.7% vs 41.7%, P = .04). Using a computerized clinical decision support system to automate the screening of children for developmental delay significantly increased the numbers of children screened at 9, 18, and 30 months of age. It also significantly improved surveillance at other visits. Moreover, it increased the number of children who ultimately were diagnosed as having developmental delay and who were referred for timely services at an earlier age. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01351077.

1750 Implementing Developmental Screening Recommendations in a Family Medicine Residency Training Program: Barriers, Solutions and Recommendations for Practice

Background and AimsThe American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all children, as part of well child care, have validated developmental screening in the medical home. Testing increases the early identification...

Engaging Pediatricians in Developmental Screening: The Effectiveness of Academic Detailing

Use of formal developmental screening tools in the pediatric medical home improves early identification of children with developmental delays and disorders, including Autism Spectrum Disorders. A pilot study evaluated the impact of an academic detailing module in which trainers visited 43 pediatric primary care practices to provide education about implementing developmental screening tools in well-child services. Attendees responded to a post presentation survey stating that they planned to implement screening in their practices. Medicaid billing data showed an increase in the state's overall rate of screening. An audit of medical charts in five practices that received the training and five that did not showed higher screening rates in practices that received the training as well as higher rates after the training than before. These pilot study results indicate the potential of academic detailing as an effective strategy for improving rates of developmental screening.

Enhancing Developmentally Oriented Primary Care: An Illinois Initiative to Increase Developmental Screening in Medical Homes

In 2005, the Enhancing Developmentally Oriented Primary Care (EDOPC) project of the Illinois chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services began a project to improve the delivery and financing of preventive health and developmental services for children in Illinois. The leaders of this initiative sought to increase primary care providers' use of validated tools for developmental, social/emotional, maternal depression, and domestic violence screening and to increase early awareness of autism symptoms during pediatric well-child visits in children aged 0 to 3 years. These screenings facilitate identification of children at risk and those who need referral for further evaluation. Primary barriers to such screenings include lack of practitioner confidence in using validated screening tools. In this article we describe the accomplishments of the EDOPC project, which created training programs to address these barriers. This training is delivered by EDOPC staff and peer educators (physicians and nurse practitioners) in medical practices. The EDOPC project enhanced confidence and intent to screen among a large group of Illinois primary health care providers. Among a sample of primary care sites at which chart reviews were conducted, the EDOPC project increased developmental screening rates to the target of 85% of patients at most sites and increased social/emotional screening rates to the same target rate in nearly half of the participating practices.

Implementing Electronic Health Record-Based Quality Measures for Developmental Screening

The goal was to examine the current abilities and future potential of electronic health record (EHR) systems to measure childhood developmental screening and follow-up rates in primary care settings. A group of pediatric clinicians and health informatics experts was convened to develop quality indicators reflecting different aspects of the developmental screening process. These indicators included the administration of a standardized, validated instrument to screen children for developmental delays, the documentation of abnormal screening results, and the provision of follow-up care. Six integrated provider systems across the United States, with fully implemented EHR systems, were evaluated to determine the feasibility of implementing these measures within each system. Barriers related to measure implementation were identified. The EHR systems of all 6 health care organizations could implement measures examining developmental screening rates and could identify and track children with abnormal screening results. However, most of the systems did not have the ability to capture data for more-complex EHR-based measures. In particular, data elements based on workflow actions could not be captured with current EHR system designs. This study identified 2 main barriers to the implementation of developmental quality measures: concerns about data reliability and the tracking of care coordination within patient records. Potential solutions to these problems, including terminology standardization, patient portal use, and use of a single developmental screening instrument, are discussed.