Rates Of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Research Articles

Global variations in coronary revascularisation and acute myocardial infarction mortality between 2006-2020: a longitudinal, population-level analysis of 16 high-income nations from the OECD database

Abstract Background Revascularisation options for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) includes either, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). Whilst PCI remains the preferred choice in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)(1), several landmark trials have questioned its universal superiority (2,3), thus prompting re-evaluation of guidelines. A wide-scale contemporary overview of revascularisation trends is lacking. Purpose To examine the evolving pattern in PCI and CABG rates, alongside mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) across a group of 16 high-income countries between 2006 and 2020. Methods Standardized PCI and CABG procedure rates alongside AMI age-standardised mortality rate (ASMR) were obtained from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) database. Data from 2006-2020 was extracted for; Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom (UK). Together, these countries are commonly known as the European Union (EU) 15+ and represent a cluster of high-income nations with comparable levels of health expenditure. Procedural trends including the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) were evaluated using Joinpoint analysis whilst Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing (LOESS) models was used to analysis trends in AMI mortality. Results Over 15 years, 14.0 million PCI and 2.8 million CABG procedures were recorded in total. PCI rates varied amongst nations (Figure 1), however showed an overall increase in 11 countries, led by Finland (+36.0%). The steepest increase was observed in France between 2012-2018 (EAPC 5.4, 95% CI: 4.8 – 6.1). The greatest overall decrease in PCI was observed in Luxemburg (-33.5%). The fastest decrease was seen during 2018-2020 in the UK (EAPC -7.2, 95% CI: -9.7 – -4.6). CABG rates declined overall in 15 countries (Figure 1), with Luxembourg (-71.3%), experiencing the largest fall and showing the steepest decline between 2014-2018 (EAPC -20.7, 95% CI: -28.3 – -12.3). Ireland was the only country to show an increase in CABG rate (+16.3%). Throughout the study period, the PCI-to-CABG ratio increased (Figure 2A), whilst AMI mortality decreased consistently across all countries (Figure 2B). Conclusion Despite evidence supporting CABG over PCI in specific scenarios, CABG rates have declined, and PCI rates have increased. This trend may be influenced by several factors including patient preference for less invasive procedures and advancements in interventional techniques. The varied use of PCI among these nations, alongside a sustained decline in AMI mortality rates, may be expected given the importance of optimal medical therapy in the management of IHD. The results further highlight the significance of factors beyond revascularisation in driving improved outcomes.PCI and CABG rates between 2006 and 2020PCI to CABG ratio and AMI mortality rate

Is chronic kidney disease predictive of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute coronary syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) provides superior long-term outcomes to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for multi-vessel coronary artery disease. People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and experience greater morbidity and mortality following acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Purpose To determine whether CKD affects choice of revascularisation strategy after ACS. Methods We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CENTRAL and the NIHR’s website of funded studies to identify articles referring to ACS and invasive coronary management in high-income countries over the past 12 years until 29th September 2023. Full text articles were included if data on rates of CABG were reported in people with and without CKD who were revascularised following ACS. CKD was defined as one or more recording of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60mls/min/1.73m2, however proxies for this were accepted. Risk of bias was assessed via ROBINS-E. Random effect meta-analyses estimated the odds ratios for CKD and CABG, stratified by ACS type and receipt of dialysis. Certainty of evidence was assessed according to GRADE. Results Initial searches generated 15,138 articles, of which 13 observational studies were included in this review (8,021,743 participants). Amongst people revascularised following ACS, those with CKD were more likely to receive CABG than those without kidney disease (OR for the average exposure effect 1.47 (95% CI 1.30-1.66)). The likelihood of CABG in people with CKD receiving dialysis and those with CKD not receiving dialysis were similar as the 95% confidence intervals demonstrate (ORs 1.25 (95% CI 1.00-1.57) and 1.41 (1.19-1.67) respectively). The effect of CKD on increased likelihood of CABG appeared greater following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than non-ST elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) (OR 1.53 (95% CI 1.27-1.83) versus 1.10 (0.98-1.25) respectively, p=0.003). Certainty of the evidence was low for receipt of CABG in people with CKD not receiving dialysis, and moderate for all other outcomes. Conclusion In high-income countries, CKD is associated with increased receipt of CABG amongst people revascularised following ACS. This finding is likely explained by the greater prevalence of multi-vessel coronary artery disease in this population. It is however unclear why the association between CKD and receipt of CABG is stronger in those with STEMI compared to NSTE-ACS, and whether this accurately reflects differential need between the two groups.Figure 1Figure 2

Rotational atherectomy versus orbital atherectomy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 81,873 patients

Abstract Background Previous studies have suggested that pre-treatment of coronary artery calcification with rotational atherectomy (RA) prior to stent deployment can enhance procedural success, but this does not necessarily translate into improved clinical outcomes. Recently, the Orbital Atherectomy (OA) system has been introduced into clinical practice to enhance lesion preparation. Purpose Our study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both RA and OA as pre-treatment strategies before stent deployment in patients with coronary artery calcification. Methods We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. These were identified through systematic PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until January 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using Stata version 17. Results Our analysis included eleven studies encompassing 81,873 patients. No significant difference was observed between RA and OA in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR: 0.81 with 95% CI [0.64, 1.02], P= 0.07). However, OA was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.60 with 95% CI [0.52, 0.70], P< 0.01), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (RR: 0.43 with 95% CI [0.22, 0.82], P= 0.01), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (RR: 0.78 with 95% CI [0.62, 0.97], P= 0.03), and fluoroscopy time (MD: -3.93 with 95% CI [-7.39, -0.48], P= 0.03). There was no significant difference between RA and OA in cardiac death (RR: 2.65 with 95% CI [0.94, 7.51], P= 0.07), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (RR: 0.57 with 95% CI [0.23, 1.41], P= 0.22), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.79 with 95% CI [0.62, 1.01], P= 0.06), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.09, 1.23], P= 0.10), stroke (RR: 0.76 with 95% CI [0.57, 1.01], P= 0.06), re-admission (RR: 0.76 with 95% CI [0.48, 1.19], P= 0.23), vessel closure (RR: 0.78 with 95% CI [0.18, 3.33], P= 0.74), procedural duration (MD: -5.43 with 95% CI [-21.71, 10.84], P= 0.51), length of hospital stay (MD: 0.21 with 95% CI [-0.47, 0.90], P= 0.54), and contrast amount (MD: -3.68 with 95% CI [-9.37, 2.01], P= 0.21). Conclusion Both RA and OA as pre-treatment strategies before stent deployment demonstrate similar outcomes for numerous cardiovascular events. However, OA is associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality, TVR, CABG, and fluoroscopy time.

Hospital and Physician Variability in Revascularization Decisions and Outcomes for Patients With 3-Vessel and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Hospital- and physician-level variation for selection of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with coronary artery disease has been associated with outcome differences. However, most studies excluded patients treated medically. From 2010 to 2019, adults with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease at 3 hospitals (A, B, C) in Alberta, Canada, were categorized by treatment with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, or CABG. Multilevel regression models determined the proportion of variation in treatment attributable to patient, physician, and hospital factors, and survival models assessed outcomes including death and major adverse cardiovascular events over 5 years. Of 22 580 patients (mean age, 67 years; 80% men): 6677 (29%) received medical management, 9171 (41%) percutaneous coronary intervention, and 6732 (30%) CABG. Hospital factors accounted for 10.8% of treatment variation. In adjusted models (site A as reference), patients at sites B and C had 49% (95% CI, 44%-53%) and 43% (95% CI, 37%-49%) lower rates of medical therapy, respectively, and 31% (95% CI, 24%-38%) and 32% (95% CI, 24%-40%) lower rates of CABG. During 5.0 years median follow-up, 3287 (14.6%) patients died, with no intersite mortality differences. There were no between-site differences in acute coronary syndromes or stroke; patients at sites B and C had 24% lower risk (95% CI, 13%-34% and 11%-35%, respectively) of heart failure hospitalization. Hospital-level variation in selection of percutaneous coronary intervention, CABG, or medical therapy for patients with complex coronary artery disease was not associated with differences in 5-year mortality rates. Research and quality improvement initiatives comparing revascularization practices should include medically managed patients.

Review of the Association Between Long-Term and Current Systemic Steroid Use With Electromechanical Complications and Inpatient Mortality After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background The impact of long-term systemic steroid use on electrical and mechanical complications following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been extensively studied. Methods In a retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2018 to 2020, adults admitted with STEMI were dichotomized based on the presence of long-term (current) systemic steroid (LTCSS) use. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mechanical complications, electrical, hemodynamic, and thrombotic complications, as well as revascularization complexity, length of stay (LOS), and total charge. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to adjust for confounders. Results Out of 608,210 admissions for STEMI, 5,310 (0.9%) had LTCSS use. There was no significant difference in the odds of all-cause mortality (aOR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.74-1.08, p-value: 0.245) and the composite of mechanical complications (aOR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.25-2.30, p-value: 0.599). LTCSS use was associated with lower odds of ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular blocks, new permanent-pacemaker insertion, cardiogenic shock, the need for mechanical circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, cardioversion, a reduced LOS by 1 day, and a reduced total charge by 34,512 USD (all p-values: <0.05). There were no significant differences in the revascularization strategy (coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)) or in the incidence of composite thrombotic events. Conclusion LTCSS use among patients admitted with STEMI was associated with lower odds of electrical dysfunction and hemodynamic instability but no difference in the odds of mechanical complications, CABG rate, all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest, or thrombotic complications. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate these findings further.

Five-year outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing surgery or percutaneous intervention

The outcomes from real-life clinical studies regarding the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) are still poorly investigated. In this retrospective study we assessed 5-year outcomes: primary, secondary endpoints and quality of life of 1035 individuals with severe coronary artery disease (CAD) treated either with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)—356 patients or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)—679 patients according to the recommendation of a local Heart Team (HT). At 5 years no significant difference in overall mortality and rates of myocardial infarctions (MI) were observed between CABG and PCI cohorts (11.0% vs. 13.4% for PCI, P = 0.27 and 9.6% vs. 12.8% for PCI, P = 0.12, respectively). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), mainly driven by increased rates of repeat revascularization (RR) were higher in PCI-cohort than in CABG-group (56.1% vs. 40.4%, P < 0.01 and 26.8% vs. 12.6%, P < 0.01, respectively), while CABG-patients experienced stroke more often (7.3% vs. 3.1% for PCI, P < 0.01). In real-life practice with long-term follow-up, none of the two revascularization modalities implemented following HT decisions showed overwhelming superiority: occurrence of death and MI were similar, rates of RR favoured CABG, while incidence of strokes advocated PCI.

Success Rate of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Elderly Patients in Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya

Highlights: CABG is the most performed cardiac surgery in Indonesia, and most patients undergoing this surgery are above 60 years old. CABG success rate is not significantly influenced solely by the patient’s age but also by several perioperative characteristics such as gender, comorbidities, and other variables included in the calculation of EuroSCORE II. Abstract Introduction: Coronary artery disease (CAD) causes more than a quarter of deaths in Indonesia and is found to be more prevalent in the elderly (≥60 years old). Treatment includes coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the most-performed cardiac surgery in Indonesia. This study aimed to determine the short-term and one-year postoperative success, morbidity, and mortality rates with their causes in Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya. Methods: This was a cross-sectional retrospective study using secondary data obtained from 85 medical records of CABG patients aged ≥60 years old in the Department of Thoracic, Cardiac, and Vascular Surgery, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, from January 2018 to December 2020. Aside from descriptive statistics, logistic regression was conducted to assess the relationship between EuroSCORE II and the success of CABG in elderly patients. Results: Patients were mostly male in their sixties with a mean of 65.5 ± 4.9 years old, had three-vessel disease, and had a predicted mortality rate of 1.6%. The average number of grafts used was 3.3 ± 0.7, and the average length of hospital stay was 7.4 ± 2.4 days. The morbidity rate was 71.8%, with bleeding as the most common complication, a 17.6% mortality rate with septic shock as the most frequent cause, and a success rate of 82.4% (short-term) and 80% (one-year postoperative). Higher EuroSCORE II was found to significantly decrease the probability of both short-term and one-year postoperative success. Conclusion: The success rates of CABG in Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, were 82.4% (short-term) and 80% (one-year postoperative), negatively correlated with EuroSCORE II.

Longitudinal outcomes of final kissing balloon inflation in coronary bifurcation lesions treated with a single stent

BackgroundFinal kissing balloon inflation (FKBI) is a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technique that is considered mandatory to improve outcomes in two-stent strategies, but its use in single-stent bifurcation PCI remains controversial.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with one stent from January 2012 to March 2021 at a single academic medical center. Incidence rates per 1,000 patient-years (IR1000) were calculated for the outcomes of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stent thrombosis (ST), target lesion revascularization (TLR), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and cardiac readmission between patients who received FKBI and those who did not over a median follow up of 2.3 years. Studied outcomes were adjusted for all baseline clinical and procedural characteristics.ResultsThis study included 893 consecutive patients of which 256 received FKBI and 637 did not. The IR1000 for MI were 51.1 and 27.6 for patients who received FKBI and patients who did not, respectively (adjusted HR = 2.44, p = 0.001). The IR1000 for death were 31.2 and 52.3 for patients who received FKBI and patients who did not, respectively (adjusted HR = 0.68, p = 0.141). The incidence rates of ST, TLR, CABG, and cardiac readmissions were similar between patients who received FKBI and those who did not.ConclusionsThese results suggest that performing FKBI in a one-stent technique was associated with higher rates of myocardial infarction, particularly in the first 6 months, and no difference in death, ST, TLR, CABG, and cardiac readmission rates.

Mortality after cardiovascular surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention prior to versus during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the usual delivery of health care services globally. However, little is known about its specific impact on cardiovascular procedure rates and outcomes. Purpose To compare rates of isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, isolated open valve surgery (iValve) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 30-day all-cause mortality among patients undergoing these procedures before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We undertook a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18 years and older in Ontario, Canada, comparing procedure and outcome event rates between April 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020 (pre-pandemic) with those between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2022 (pandemic). Procedures were identified from hospital records, available for all patients hospitalized in the province, and were calculated per 100,000 population. Deaths were identified from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan Registered Persons Database. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to compute mortality rates adjusted for relevant sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Additionally, we estimated the number of procedures needed to result in one excess death as the difference between the two periods divided by the pre-pandemic rate. Results During the study period, 24,823, 7,768 and 86,549 patients underwent CABG, iValve and PCI respectively. Between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods, CABG, iValve and PCI rates declined 18.8%, 19.3% and 14.7%, respectively (Figure). Overall, the 30-day mortality rates were 1.9%, 2.4% and 2.6% following CABG, iValve and PCI, respectively. Adjusted 30-day mortality after CABG increased from 1.92 per 100 procedures (95% CI 1.69-2.15) pre-pandemic to 2.25 (2.01-2.49) during the pandemic (p=0.043). Adjusted 30-day mortality also increased among patients receiving iValve [from 2.25 (1.78, 2.71) to 3.29 (2.76, 3.82); p=0.016] and PCI [from 2.41 (2.28, 2.54) to 2.74 (2.60, 2.88); p&amp;lt;0.001]. These differences translate to an estimated excess of one death per 303 CABG surgeries, 96 iValve surgeries and 303 PCIs during the pandemic period. Conclusions In Ontario, Canada, CABG, iValve and PCI rates decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic and had not fully returned to pre-pandemic levels by two years following its initiation. While 30-day mortality rates following cardiovascular procedures significantly increased during the pandemic, the incremental number of additional deaths was small.

National trends in emergency coronary artery bypass grafting.

Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often omitted from current research, and volumes as well as outcomes are unknown. The purpose of this research is to examine national trends in emergency CABG. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons national adult cardiac surgical database was queried from 2005 to 2017 for patients who underwent emergency and emergency salvage isolated CABG procedures, and 92607 patients were included for analysis. Generalized linear mixed models were used to assess time trends, taking into account the clustering effect of region. Over the study period, volumes of emergency and emergency salvage CABG declined from 7991 to 6916 cases/year. Emergency and emergency salvage cases accounted for ∼4.9% of all CABG procedures performed nationwide in 2005 and 4.1% in 2017. The predicted risk of mortality (PROM) declined in the entire patient cohort over time from 12% to 8% (P < 0.0001). Rates of important postoperative morbidities also declined including prolonged intubation, re-exploration for haemorrhage and postoperative pneumonia (P < 0.001). Observed-to-expected mortality rates rose over the study period from 0.81 to 1.06 as the overall PROM declined from 9.3% to 7.6%. Emergency salvage CABG rates also declined over the course of the study from 358 to 323 cases/year. The observed-to-expected ratios for mortality increased for emergency salvage CABG during the study from 1.16 to 1.66, and emergency salvage mortality rates averaged 46.5%. The volume of patients undergoing emergency and emergency salvage CABG in the USA has declined. Increases in mortality are largely driven by emergency salvage cases, and the PROM algorithm may not accurately reflect the risk involved for these patients.

Effects of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction Heart Failure and Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

To clarify the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) complicated with reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF) through meta-analysis. Three major literature databases - PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane - were searched by search terms and the literature retrieval time was publications dating from January 2007 to December 2021. To search for observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the efficacy of PCI and CABG in patients with CHD and HFrEF, the abstract or full text of the literature was read and the final included literature was determined, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included literature was evaluated using the Ottawa scale and data extraction was further completed. Data analysis was made using RevMan5.4 and R4.1 software; relevant forest plots and funnel plots were made, according to the extracted data. Egger's test was used to evaluate whether the data had publication bias. Outcomes were the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). A total of 10 studies were included and 11,032 subjects were included, made up of 5,521 cases of PCI and 5,511 cases of CABG. The results showed no significant difference between the two groups in cardiac mortality (CM) (RR=1.13, 95% CI 0.98-1.30, P = 0.10) and in overall all-cause mortality (ACM) (RR=1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.37, P = 0.25). In the subgroup analysis of ACM, in the subgroups with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35% and exceeding 35% and less than 50% (RR=1.12, 95% CI 0.92-1.37, P = 0.25) between the two groups, there was no statistical difference. However, among other MACE, compared with the PCI group, the CABG group had a lower risk of MACE (RR=1.58, 95%CI 1.49-1.70, P < 0.00001), myocardial infarction (MI) (RR=1.99, 95% CI 1.02-3.88, P = 0.04), heart failure (HF) (RR=1.29, 95% CI 1.17-1.43, P < 0.00001) and revascularization (RR=2.74, 95% CI 1.93-3.90, P < 0.00001). Finally in the CABG group, the risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was higher (RR=0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.86, P = 0.0006) than the PCI group. The mortality rates of PCI and CABG were similar in patients with CHD complicated with HFrEF. Compared with PCI, CABG had a lower incidence of MACE, MI, HF, and revascularization, and a higher incidence of stroke or TIA.

Trends and Outcomes for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in New South Wales from 2008 to 2019

Risk profiles are changing for patients who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In Australia, little is known of the nature of these changes in contemporary practice and of the impact on patient outcomes. We identified all CABG (n=40,805) and PCI (n=142,399) procedures in patients aged ≥18 years in New South Wales, Australia, during 2008 to 2019. Between 2008 and 2019, the age- and gender-standardized revascularization rate increased by 20% (from 267/100,000 to 320/100,000 population) for all revascularizations. The increase in revascularization was particularly driven by a 35% increase (from 194/100,000 to 261/100,000) in PCI, whereas the rate of CABG decreased by 20% (from 73/100,000 to 59/100,000). Mean age and the prevalence of co-morbidities (especially diabetes and atrial fibrillation) increased for patients with PCI in more recent years but remained consistently lower than for patients with CABG. CABGs performed in patients presenting with a non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome halved from 34.3% to 18.7% during the study period, whereas PCIs in this group decreased from 36.5% to 29.6%. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality decreased by 7.5 deaths/1,000 procedures per month for CABG but remained unchanged for PCI. Risk-adjusted readmission rates were consistently higher for CABG than for PCI and did not change significantly over time. In conclusion, we observed a dramatic shift over time from CABG to PCI as the revascularization procedure of choice, with the patient base for PCI extending to older and sicker patients. There was a large decrease in mortality after CABG, whereas mortality after PCI remained unchanged.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients With Three Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Comparison of Centers in the Same Jurisdiction With Differing Multidisciplinary Heart Team Approaches.

Referral patterns and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were compared between 2 centers within 1 jurisdiction wherein only 1 center utilizes multidisciplinary review for all patients. Management of advanced coronary artery disease often involves PCI and CABG for improvements in quality of life and survival. Indications exist for PCI and CABG, with CABG demonstrating benefit in three-vessel disease (TVD). A total of 27,961 patients underwent cardiac catheterization in 2 centers within the same single-payer health jurisdiction (Center A and B) from 2017 to 2018. Rates of PCI, CABG, and outcomes of 1-year mortality, rehospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke were compared. More patients in Center A received PCI and less received CABG compared with Center B even among patients with TVD ( P <0.001). Multivariable logistic regression identified Center B as protective for mortality for TVD patients ( P <0.001) and those undergoing PCI ( P =0.004), but not CABG ( P =0.06). Center A's 1-year mortality was increased for all patients ( P =0.004) and those with TVD ( P =0.011). Discordant outcomes exist between these 2 centers. While patients in Center A were more likely to undergo PCI than Center B and experienced decreased 1-year survival, the difference was not significant for CABG. In part, the differences are attributable to contrasting referral practices and the discrepant rates of PCI and CABG between centers. Review of all coronary artery disease patients with a multidisciplinary Heart Team including a surgical opinion may lead to a more evidence-based referral practice aligned with current clinical guidelines.

Accurate understanding of the changes in the recommendations on coronary artery bypass grafting and radial artery in the 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline For Coronary Artery Revascularization

The 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline For Coronary Artery Revascularization has been brought into focus and widely questioned by multiple associations of cardiac surgeons around the world, in which the class of recommendation (COR) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was downgraded from Ⅰ to Ⅱb in the treatment of 3 vessel coronary artery disease, and the use of radial artery as CABG conduit was elevated to COR Ⅰ. The ISCHEMIA trial, which was cited by the guidelines as evidence, had obvious selection bias. It did not consider the advantages of long-term patency rate of CABG in patients with high risk factors, and did not define that radial artery bypass has a certain applicable population. Only by widely collecting and carefully selecting evidence and collaborating with cardiac surgeons in the multidisciplinary team of coronary heart disease, the more reasonable and comprehensive guidelines and suggestions could be formed.

Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI.

Objective To review the evidence behind the role and relevance of redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the current practice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed to identify articles that discuss the practice of PCI and redo CABG in patients that require coronary revascularization. All relevant studies are summarized in narrative manner to reflect current indications and preference.Results The advancement in utilization of PCI has reduced the rate of redo CABG in patients with previous CABG that requires revascularization of an already treated coronary disease or a new onset of coronary artery stenosis. Redo CABG is associated with satisfactory perioperative outcomes but higher mortality at immediate postoperative period when compared to PCI.Conclusion Redo CABG patients are less likely to develop comorbidities associated with revascularisation, but the operative mortality is higher and long-term survival rates are similar in comparison to PCI. There is a need for further research into the role of redo CABG in the current advanced practice of PCI.

Abstract 10388: The Role of Patient, Community and Healthcare System Factors in the Variability of Cardiovascular Hospital Readmissions

Introduction: The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) penalizes hospitals by reducing Medicare (CMS) reimbursement for institutions with higher rates of readmissions following hospitalizations for myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and heart failure (HF). Understanding the contributors to these readmissions can identify meaningful areas for intervention. We examine whether community and patient or healthcare system factors contribute more to variability in cardiac readmissions. Methods: We compiled CMS hospital data on MI, CABG and HF readmissions, CMS physician reimbursement data, and 2020-21 County Health Rankings (Credit: University of Wisconsin). The outcome was the ratio of a hospital’s composite readmissions for MI, CABG and HF to discharges for the same conditions. Physician/healthcare system factors included total cardiac subspecialists, presence of all subspecialties, and the mean proportion of reimbursed charges. Patient and community factors included mean Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) risk score, median household income, proportion of residents reporting no physical activity, and access to food stores. Linear regression models were compared using R 2 , AIC, BIC in model training data and mean absolute prediction error (MAPE) and root mean square prediction error (RMSE) in test data. Results: The linear regression model incorporating community and patient factors explained greater variability in readmission rates in training data and performed with greater accuracy in the test data (R 2 0.35; AIC -1839; BIC -1811; MAPE 0.017; RMSE 0.022) than the model incorporating physician/healthcare system factors (R 2 0.04; AIC - 1685; BIC - 1664; MAPE 0.022; RMSE 0.027). HCC score, level of physical activity, and number of cardiac specialists were associated with the largest effect sizes on the outcome. Conclusions: At a county level, community and patient factors appear to contribute more to variability in hospitals’ MI, CABG and and HF readmission rates. Further analyses should explore other community, patient, and provider factors that may contribute. The HRRP does not account for community/patient factors, indicating its limitations.

Outcomes of Cardiac Arrest Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Current and Historical Cancer: An 18-Year United States Cohort Study

BackgroundData regarding cardiac arrest (CA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with cancers are limited. MethodsUsing the HCUP-NIS database (2000–2017), we identified adult admissions with AMI-CA and current or historical cancers to evaluate in-hospital mortality, utilization of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mechanical circulatory support (MCS), palliative care consultation, do-not-resuscitate status use, among those with current, historical and without cancer. ResultsOf 11,622,528 AMI admissions, CA was noted in 584,263 (5.0%). Current and historical cancers were identified in 14,790 (2.5%) and 26,939 (4.6%), respectively. Both current and historical cancer groups were on average older, of white race, had greater comorbidity, and received care at small/medium-sized hospitals compared to those without. The current cancer cohort had the lowest rates of coronary angiography (45.2% vs. 59.2% vs. 63.3%), PCI (32.4% vs. 42.3% vs. 47.0%), MCS (13.5% vs. 16.5% vs. 20.9%) and CABG (4.1% vs. 7.6% vs. 10.2%) compared to the historical cancer and no cancer cohorts (all p < 0.001). Compared to those without, the current (61.1% vs. 44.0%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.25 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.20–1.31], p < 0.001) and historical cancer cohorts (52.2% vs. 44.0%; adjusted OR 1.05 [95% CI 1.01–1.08], p = 0.003) had higher in-hospital mortality. Cancer admissions had higher rates of palliative care consultations and do-not-resuscitate status. ConclusionAMI-CA admissions with cancer were older, had lower utilization of cardiac procedures, and higher rates of palliative care and do-not-resuscitate status and in-hospital mortality compared to those without cancer.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Brazil: A nationwide perspective.

IntroductionThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic has been a worldwide challenge, and efforts to “flatten the curve,” including restrictions imposed by policymakers and medical societies, have forced a reduction in the number of procedures performed in the Brazilian Health Care System. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) from 2008 to 2020 in the SUS and to assess the impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic in the number of procedures and death rate of CABG performed in 2020 through the database DATASUS.MethodsThis study is based on publicly available material obtained from DATASUS, the Brazilian Ministry of Health's data processing system, on numbers of surgical procedures and death rates. Only isolated CABG procedures were included in our study. We used the TabNet software from the DATASUS website to generate reports.ResultsWe identified 281,760 CABG procedures performed from January 2008 to December 2020. The average number of procedures until the end of 2019 was of 22,104. During 2020 there was a 25% reduction CABG procedures, to 16,501. There was an increase in the national death rate caused by a statistical significant increase in death rates in Brazil's Southeast and Central‐west regions.ConclusionThe COVID‐19 pandemic remains a global challenge for Brazil's health care system. During the year of 2020 there was a reduction in access to CABG related to an increase in the number of COVID‐19 cases. There was also an increase in the national CABG death rate.

Abstract 14710: Cardiovascular Interventions in Face of Covid-19 Pandemic in a Low to Middle Income Country of South Asia Region - A Pre and Post Covid Era Comparison!

Introduction: Worldwide, cardiologists have reported decline in cardiac catheterization lab (CCL) activation. In this study, we analysed the impact of COVID19 outbreak on cardiology intervention in a tertiary care centre of epicentre of Pakistan. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted via emergency department (ED) and undergoing cardiovascular intervention. Data for CCL procedures was obtained from electronic register for March-April 2019 (pre-COVID era - pCE) and March-April 2020 (COVID era - CE). Comparison was made between the two era for number of times CCL was activated with regard to left heart catheterization (LHC), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). This study also compared numbers for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and cardiac imaging. Results: A total of 239 and 106 patients were admitted via ED in pCE and CE respectively (Reduction =R=55.6%). Total procedures performed dropped from 183 to 73 (R = 60.11%). Numbers for primary PCI were 34 (pCE) and 16 (CE) with R = 52.94%. 41 patients underwent LHC in pCE in comparison to 13 patients in CE (R = 68.29%). PCI other than primary was performed in 30 (pCE) and 24 patients (CE) with R = 20%. CABG numbered to 26 (pCE) and 12 (CE) with R = 53.85%. CIED was implanted in 12 and 2 patients in pCE and CE respectively (R = 83.33%). Additionally cardiac imaging modality was used in 38 (pCE) and 6 patients (CE) with R = 84.21 %. Conclusion: There is significant reduction in rate of primary PCI, LHC, CABG, CIED and non-invasive imaging procedures during CE. South-asia region carries huge burden of undiagnosed cardiovascular disease. Significant drop in cardiovascular procedure in CE is alarming and warns us for need of preparedness for times of increased late presentations or cardiovascular morbidity or mortality. This highlights the importance of urging public to report for their cardiac symptoms in face of COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract 15863: Prevalence, Trends and Impact of Cannabis Use on Hospitalizations With Prior Myocardial Infarction and Revascularization

Background: With the rise of cannabis use in the USA, we aim to assess its prevalence and impact on admissions with prior myocardial infarction and revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and/or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)]. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (2007-2014) to identify admissions with prior MI/PCI/CABG for the prevalence, trends and impact of cannabis use disorder. Results: Patients cohort with prior MI and revascularization with cannabis use consisted of younger (median age years 53 (46-59) vs 72 (63-81), African American (34.3% vs. 10.0%) male (76.5% vs. 61.5%) patients v/s non cannabis users (p&lt;0.001). Co-morbid conditions such as hypertension (71.7% vs. 74.8%), diabetes, uncomplicated (23.6% vs. 32.9%), dyslipidemia (51.3% vs. 57.8%) (p&lt; 0.001) were significantly lower in cannabis users. There were increasing trends of cannabis use from 0.2 to 0.7% over the study period with a higher rate of AMI (7.2% vs 4.5%), PCI (6.2% vs 5.5%) and CABG (1.9% vs 1.5%) in cannabis users as shown in Fig 1a and 1b . All-cause mortality (0.8% vs 2.5%), hospital charges (21556 vs 24872) were low among cannabis users. Subsequent AMI in cannabis users was 67% v/s 41% in non-cannabis users. Conclusion: There are alarmingly rising trends in cannabis use in patients with prior MI/PCI/CABG from 2017-2014. Even with younger and overall lower comorbidity burden in cannabis users, the frequency of recurrent AMI and revascularization was seen higher but lower inpatient mortality.