Complete Remission Rate Research Articles

Orelabrutinib, rituximab, temozolomide and high-dose methotrexate (RMOT) in newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL): A retrospective analysis on efficacy and safety.

e19041 Background: PCNSL is a rare, aggressive malignant tumor and has a poor prognosis. HD-MTX-based regimen is the first-line treatment of PCNSL. Orelabrutinib is a novel, potent, highly selective BTK inhibitor with a high CSF concentration. Recent evidence has shown the efficacy and safety of orelabrutinib in PCNSL. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study of clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed PCNSL patients (pts) treated with RMOT regimen in routine clinical care. Methods: This retrospective cohort included the pts (aged 18-80 years) with newly diagnosed PCNSL who received 6 cycles of RMOT regimen (rituximab 375 mg/m2 iv day 1; MTX 3.5 g/m2 iv day 1; temozolomide 150 mg/m2 po day 1 to day 5; orelabrutinib 150 mg qd po; 4 weeks per cycle) as the first-line induction therapy between Nov. 2021 and Aug. 2023. All the pts were proposed to receive orelabrutinib monotherapy as maintenance after RMOT therapy. We recommend to receive autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) as consolidation after RMOT therapy. Efficacy was assessed by MRI/PET per the International PCNSL Collaborative Group (IPCG) criteria. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were CR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Ten pts (6 males) with PCNSL were included, with a median age of 61 years (range, 45-77). All pts had a histologically confirmed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. 4 pts (40%) underwent WBRT after induction therapy. As of the cut-off date (December 31, 2023), the median follow-up time was 9.7 (range, 4.8-25.7) month. All pts were evaluated for the treatment response. An interim evaluation after 4 cycles was available for 10 pts, showing complete remission (CR) rate of 80% (8/10), partial response (PR) rate of 20% (2/10), giving an ORR of 100.0% (10/10, Table). At data cutoff, the best ORR was 100.0% (10/10), with all pts achieved CR. Of 10 responders, 9 had an ongoing response, and 1 died of covid-19 infection. Median PFS/OS was not reached (NR) (95% CI NR-NR). The most common AEs were anemia, other include white blood cell or platelet count decreased. Reported AEs were generally manageable and resolved soon after supportive treatment. Only 1 (10%) pts experienced ≥grade 3 AEs—acute kidney injury. No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: This retrospective data suggested that RMOT had an encouraging anti-tumor activity in newly diagnosed PCNSL pts, with a toleratable safety profile. This orelabrutinib-containing regimens may provide a potential treatment strategy for pts with PCNSL. [Table: see text]

Evaluation of the toxicity and outcomes of the combination of midostaurin and CLAG-M in patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML): A multi-center retrospective analysis.

6523 Background: FLT3-mutated AML is associated with poor outcomes. Addition of midostaurin (multi-targeted kinase inhibitor) to standard “7+3” with cytarabine and daunorubicin significantly prolongs overall and event-free survival for these patients (Stone 2017). At the University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (UW/FHCC), the standard regimen for newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML is cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, GCSF, and mitoxantrone (CLAG-M); midostaurin is added if FLT3-mutated (Halpern 2018). There is currently no peer-reviewed literature to support this combination for these patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of midostaurin with CLAG-M in FLT3-mutated AML patients and compare the toxicity profile to midostaurin plus 7+3. Methods: This is a retrospective multi-center review conducted at three major cancer centers. Through pharmacy records and/or an institutional AML database, we identified adults with FLT3-mutated AML undergoing (re)induction chemotherapy who received either CLAG-M (UW/FHCC, Swedish) or 7+3 (OHSU, Swedish). The primary outcome was toxicity profile of the combination as measured by rate of adverse events ([AE], CTCAE Version 5.0). Secondary outcomes included disease response per ELN2017 AML working group criteria and 28-day mortality (TRM) (Döhner 2017). Patients treated on a clinical trial and in whom midostaurin was started > 30 days after day 1 of chemotherapy were excluded. Rates of AEs were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Eighty patients treated between 10/2022-12/2023 were included; 35 patients received CLAG-M, and 44 patients 7+3. Baseline characteristics were similar across all institutions, with most patients having adverse or intermediate risk disease. AE rates were similar between the two cohorts, (Table 1) except diarrhea and bleeding events were more common in the 7+3 vs. CLAG-M cohort (p = 0.004 and p = 0.037, respectively). The rate of complete remission (CR) plus CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) did not significantly differ between the two cohorts: CLAG-M, 86% versus 7+3, 70% for 7+3 (p =0.11). No TRM occurred. Conclusions: The toxicity profile of CLAG-M combined with midostaurin is comparable to the combination of 7+3 with midostaurin, and induces high remissions rates in adults with FLT3-mutated AML. [Table: see text]

Preliminary results from a multi-center phase Ib/II study of RC48-ADC combined with tislelizumab as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (Hope-03).

e16595 Background: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of RC48-ADC, a humanized anti-HER2 antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E, and tislelizumab, a PD-1 antibody, as a novel neoadjuvant treatment combination in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The study design has been presented at 2022 ESMO Asia meeting. The preliminary results would be reported this time. Methods: This is a Ib/II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm study (ChiECRCT20210564). 51 patients with pathological and imaging diagnosed cT2-4bN0-3M0-1a HER2 positive MIBC will be included. RC48-ADC is given every 2 weeks with a maximum dose of 120mg intravenously, and tislelizumab is given every three weeks at the dose of 200mg intravenously. Treatment efficacy will be performed by imaging and transurethral resection of tumors after the neoadjuvant treatment. Patients without disease progression will receive radical cystectomy or bladder-sparing therapies based on individual risk profiles and preferences. The primary endpoints are clinical complete remission rate (cCR, T0/Ta/Tis), pathological complete remission rate (pCR) and safety. The secondary endpoints are disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), local recurrence free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and quality of life. Results: Until now, 18 patients were included successfully, with 3 female patients and 15 male patients. And the median age was 64.47 years old. Of them, 7 patients were HER2(2+), and 11 patients were HER2(3+). The clinical stages were T2-4aN0-3M1a. Sixteen patients had the primary efficacy evaluation by now. After the neoadjuvant treatment, 7 patients were T0, 4 patients Tis, 2 patients partial response (PR), 2 patients stable disease (SD) and 1 patient suffered from progress of local disease. Hence the cCR rate was 68.75%, and the DCR was 90.91%. Fourteen patients chose radiotherapy as bladder-sparing therapy and no evidence of tumor in 6 patients who received treatment efficacy after radiotherapy. Two patients received radical cystectomy and pT3N0M0 was achieved for both. No patient died so far. For safety analysis, 4 patients suffered from immune-related adverse event, namely, grade 2 myositis, grade 1 elevated transaminase and grade 1 hyperthyroidism which led to treatment interruption of tislelizumab. And 10 patients experienced RC48-ADC related toxicities, including grade 1 elevated transaminase, grade 1 erythra and grade 1 paresthesia. No treatment related dose reduction happened. Conclusions: The novel neoadjuvant combination of RC48-ADC and tislelizumab showed promising down stage efficacy in patients with HER2 positive locally advanced MIBC and the toxicities were manageable, which would be verified by the final analysis. Clinical trial information: ChiECRCT20210564.

Clinical outcomes of patients receiving venetoclax and hypomethylating agents for AML in academic and academic-community partnerships.

e23235 Background: Prior studies have reported improved outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in academic over nonacademic settings potentially due to the availability of multidisciplinary teams, clinical trials and increased resources (1,2). Our institution has partnered with community practices to further evaluate this disparity. In this study, we analyzed treatment outcomes when nonacademic centers partnered with academic centers to treat AML using a regimen of venetoclax and a hypomethylating agent. Methods: We reviewed 92 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with venetoclax and either decitabine or azacitidine at an academic center (n = 57) or community practice with academic center support (n = 35). When partnering with the community, patients received the first cycle of therapy at an academic center. Before discharge, our team completed financial screening, scheduled follow up appointments and provided prescriptions. The primary objective was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) with a secondary evaluation of differences in chemotherapy management and complications. Results: Patients in the academic setting tended to have more adverse risk disease (80.7% vs. 74.3%, p = 0.36) according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) (table). The overall survival (OS) of all patients was 10.7 months (95% CI 9.4-15.7) with no significant difference between the groups. The ORR was similar between the community and academic settings (40.0% vs. 36.8%, p = 0.46). The complete remission (CR) rate was 11.4% in the community versus 19.3% in the academic setting (p = 0.67), and the CR rates were improved in the academic group versus the community after cycle 2 (12.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.72) and cycle 3 (25.0% vs. 0%, p = 0.46). Adverse events were comparable, except for increased rates of fatigue (80.7 vs. 54.3%, p = 0.01) and diarrhea (33.3 vs. 11.4%, p = 0.04) in the academic setting. Conclusions: Contrary to prior studies, our evaluation and ongoing partnerships support the transition of AML treatment to a community setting with academic consultation. Although there were some differences in adverse events, the OS and ORR were similar. Furthermore, this study did not identify any significant safety concerns that could prevent patients from receiving this regimen in either setting. Our goal is to continue evaluating this partnership, as we design prospective studies to improve the care of this patient population. 1. Giri S et al. OS of AML Treated at Academic Center Vs Nonacademic Center. Blood 2015. 2. Halpern AB et al. Practice patterns & outcomes for adults with AML. Hematol Am Soc 2020.[Table: see text]

Preliminary safety and efficacy of oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA) in patients (pts) with low-/Intermediate (Int)-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): Phase 2 results from the ASTREON trial.

6509 Background: There is an unmet need for new treatment (tx) options in lower-risk MDS (LR-MDS) to address cytopenias and prevent progression to higher-risk MDS and acute myeloid leukemia. Here, we report safety and preliminary efficacy data from phase 2 of the ASTREON study, which evaluated 14-day Oral-AZA regimens in pts with Low-/Int-risk MDS. Methods: ASTREON is a phase 2/3, multicenter study evaluating safety and efficacy of Oral-AZA plus best supportive care (BSC) in pts with Low-/Int-risk MDS (NCT05469737). Phase 2 is an open-label, dose optimization study to determine the recommended phase 3 Oral-AZA dose. Eligible pts (≥ 18 years of age with Revised International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS-R] Low-/Int-risk MDS and ≥ 1 cytopenia) were randomized 1:1 to receive Oral-AZA 200 mg or 300 mg QD for 14 d per 28-d cycle plus BSC. Primary endpoints are rates of adverse events (AEs) and complete remission (CR) within 6 cycles per International Working Group (IWG) 2006 criteria. Secondary endpoints include achievement of overall response (OR) (including CR, partial remission, marrow CR, hematologic improvement-erythroid response [HI-E], HI-platelet response, and HI-neutrophil response per IWG 2006 criteria); best OR; and OR duration. HI rates within 6 cycles were calculated by investigator assessment per IWG 2006 criteria for pts who received ≥ 75% of the cycle 1 dose and had ≥ 1 post-baseline (BL) efficacy assessment (modified intent-to-treat [mITT] population). Results: As of December 4, 2023, 47 pts were randomized and received ≥ 1 Oral-AZA dose (200 mg, n = 24; 300 mg, n = 23); 6 and 5 pts discontinued tx in the 200 mg and 300 mg arms. The median (range) tx durations were 24.1 (12.1–34.1) and 24.7 (7.7–39.1) wk for the 200 mg and 300 mg arms, respectively. IPSS-R scores and RBC transfusion burden at BL were balanced between tx arms. Most pts (42/47 [89.4%]) had prior MDS tx, including but not limited to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, lenalidomide, luspatercept, and imetelstat. AE rates were similar between arms: 11/24 (45.8%) vs 12/23 (52.2%) pts in the 200 mg vs 300 mg arms reported ≥ 1 tx-related grade 3 or 4 tx-emergent AE. The most common tx-related AEs in both arms were hematologic and gastrointestinal. Tx-related serious AEs occurred in 1/24 and 3/23 pts in the 200 mg and 300 mg arms, respectively. One death occurred in the 300 mg arm and was considered tx-related. In the mITT population, 8/22 and 7/21 pts achieved any HI in the 200 mg and 300 mg arms, respectively. Six pts in each dose group achieved HI-E. Among mITT pts with anemia at BL, 6/19 (31.6%) pts in the 200 mg and 5/18 (27.8%) pts in the 300 mg arm achieved HI-E. Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: The safety of Oral-AZA 200 mg and 300 mg was consistent with the known Oral-AZA safety profile. Preliminary efficacy data support continued evaluation of Oral-AZA in LR-MDS. Clinical trial information: NCT05469737 .

Analysis of factors affecting complete pathological remission after neoadjuvant immunocombination chemotherapy treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma.

e16061 Background: Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma has achieved a high rate of complete pathological remission, which is conducive to a better prognosis for patients; however, not all ESCC patients benefit from ICI therapy, so finding validated prognostic markers of efficacy will help us to screen for populations that are superior to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Methods: Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant immune-combination chemotherapy followed by radical surgery from January 2019 to June 2023 at our institution were collected. The grouping was based on whether pathologic complete remission (pCR) was achieved after neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical and treatment-related data as well as hematologic, inflammatory, and nutritional indices within 1 week before neoadjuvant therapy and within 1 week after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant immune-combination chemotherapy treatment were collected from all patients, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of pCR. Results: Patients in both pCR and Non-pCR groups were more likely to obtain pCR if they had pre-treatment BMI > 21Kg/m2 vs BMI ≤21Kg/m2, number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles ≥3 cycles vs number of neoadjuvant therapy cycles = 2 cycles, and CYFRA21-1ng/ml < 3.28 vs ≥3.28 before neoadjuvant therapy (p < 0.05). Patients with albumin ≥40.10g/L vs albumin < 40.10g/L, NLR < 2.50 vs NLR ≥2.50, and NRI ≥98.06 vs NRI < 98.06 were more likely to achieve pCR before treatment in both groups (p < 0.05). SII ≥521.75 VS SII < 521.75 was more likely to achieve pCR after 2 cycles of treatment (p < 0.05). Univariate analysis of the comparison of dynamic changes in nutritional inflammatory indexes during treatment between the two groups of patients showed that pCR was more likely to be achieved in patients with persistently elevated eosinophil counts and NLR after 2 cycles of neoadjuvant immune-combination chemotherapy treatment (p < 0.05). The results of multifactorial analysis showed that pre-treatment BMI, SII after 2 cycles of treatment, and dynamic changes in eosinophils during neoadjuvant therapy were independent influences on complete pathological remission after neoadjuvant immune-combination chemotherapy treatment (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Complete pathological remission after neoadjuvant immune-combination chemotherapy treatment for esophageal squamous carcinoma was significantly correlated with the patient's pre-treatment BMI, Post-treatment SII, and eosinophil dynamics during treatment.

Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents for favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia: A single center experience.

e18514 Background: Favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia (FR-AML) is typically treated with intensive induction chemotherapy followed by high dose consolidative cytarabine. However, a subgroup of FR-AML are not candidates for high intensity induction because of advanced age, comorbidities, or poor performance status. For these patients, hypomethylating agents (HMA) combined with venetoclax (HMA-Ven) is inferred as the standard of care based upon results of the VIALE-A trial; however, that trial enrolled only intermediate or poor risk AML. The efficacy of HMA-Ven in FR-AML is unclear. Here we present a single center experience of this regimen in FR-AML. Methods: In this retrospective single center case series, we collected data from all patients >18 years old with newly diagnosed FR-AML between January 2018 to December 2022 at AdventHealth Orlando who were treated with HMA-Ven. Patient with relapsed/refractory disease or a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. FR-AML was defined using ELN 2022 guidelines based on the results of genomic testing of the initial bone marrow aspirate. The primary endpoints were the complete remission (CR) rate and 1-year overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses were performed using the R survminer package. Results: Newly diagnosed FR-AML who received HMA-Ven were identified (n=12). The median age was 67.5 years. 3 (25%) cases had inversion of chromosome 16 and 9 (75%) had NPM1 mutations without FLT3-ITD mutations. 11 (92%) patients received decitabine and venetoclax. Patients received a median of 2.5 cycles of HMA-Ven, and all 12 patients achieved CR after one cycle of treatment. 6 (50%) patients were consolidated with intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC), 3 (25%) continued HMA-Ven, 2 (17%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant, and 1 (8%) received enasidenib. The 1-year OS was 80% (CI 0.59-1), and the median OS was not reached. 1 patient died due to chemotherapy toxicity with IDAC, and 1 patient died due to heart complications. 2 patients relapsed, 1 after IDAC and 1 after intolerance to further treatment after 6 cycles of HMA-Ven. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that HMA-Ven is an effective treatment for newly diagnosed favorable risk AML. All patients achieved CR with one cycle of treatment with most surviving more than one year. Large multicenter studies are needed to further validate these promising results.

Real-world analysis of HyperCVAD + TKI for untreated Ph+ ALL.

e18500 Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have revolutionized the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) with t(9;22) (Ph+). A single-center, single-arm, phase II study published in 2017 reported excellent outcomes in adult patients (pts) treated with ponatinib + HyperCVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine (HyperCVAD). Complete remission (CR) rate was 100% with 78% of pts achieving complete molecular response (CMR). 2-year (yr) event free survival (EFS) was 81% and overall survival (OS) was 80% with 9/37 pts undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). This treatment's success changed standard of care for patients with Ph+ ALL; however validation of these findings is needed. Methods: We performed a real-world, retrospective analysis of adult patients with previously untreated Ph+ ALL treated with at least 1 cycle of HyperCVAD + ponatinib or an alternate TKI, at our institution between 2016 and 2023. The primary endpoint was 2-yr EFS. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate all time-to-event endpoints and proportions were estimated along with 95% confidence intervals. Results: 19 patients with a median age of 46 yr were analyzed. 18 pts were newly diagnosed; 1 pt had relapsed Ph+ ALL. Median follow up was 29.4 months (m). Baseline characteristics are in the table. All evaluable patients achieved a response (18/18). 1 pt died from septic shock within 4 weeks of treatment start (5.3%). All evaluable pts achieved CMR, defined as undetectable BCR/ABL1 transcript (17/17; 1 missing). Median time to CMR was 3.83 m [1.67, 9.30]. Of the 9 pts who underwent SCT, 5 (55.6%) received ponatinib and 4 (44.4%) received an alternate TKI (p=0.350). SCT was planned in 5 pts, but performed for molecular relapse (MR) in 4 pts. No pts had clinical relapse, but incidence of MR was 40.1%. 2-yr cEFS (defined as clinical relapse or death) was 89.2% [63.1%, 97.2%]. Median cEFS was greater than 32.6 m [32.6, ∞], but when defined as death or any relapse, it decreased to 18.40 m [7.27, ∞]. 2-yr OS was 89.2% [63.1%, 97.2%]. Conclusions: While 2-yr OS and EFS are similar in our cohort to published data, a surprisingly large number of patients experienced molecular relapse, which was not reported in the original trial. While our sample size was small, there was no significant difference in CR or transplant status for patients treated with Hyper CVAD + ponatinib versus alternate TKI. [Table: see text]

Effect of rituximab on remissions without minimal residual disease and immunogenicity in patients with relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia receiving moxetumomab pasudotox.

e19015 Background: Anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox (Moxe) was FDA-approved for relapsed/refractory hairy cell leukemia (HCL) but is now unavailable due to vial expiration until a company resumes development. The phase 3 complete remission (CR) rate was 41%, higher in patients with lower anti-drug antibodies (ADA). Minimal residual disease (MRD) eradication led to longer CR duration. HCL and the poorer prognosis variant HCLv strongly express CD22 and CD20. A clinical trial was done to determine if Rituximab could decrease immunogenicity by killing normal B-cells in HCL patients receiving Moxe and hasten MRD-free CR by reducing HCL tumor burden. Methods: To permit Rituximab enough time to reduce ADA and tumor burden, it was administered 3 days before cycle 1 day 1 at 375 mg/m2, and Moxe was given by 30-minute infusion days 1, 3 and 5. On subsequent 28-day cycles, patients received Moxe days 1, 3 and 5, and Rituximab prior to Moxe on day 1. Patients received up to 4 cycles past MRD-free CR, or up to 8 total cycles if MRD-free CR was achieved after cycle 4. The ADA assay determined percent neutralization by serum of the cytotoxicity of Moxe on CD22+ Raji cells. Results: After 13 patients received Moxe-Rituximab (MoxeR) without dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), meeting the phase 1 endpoint, 5 additional patients received Moxe with the biosimilar Ruxience (MoxeR). The first 3 patients received Moxe at 30 mcg/Kg/dose and subsequent patients 40 mcg/Kg/dose. All 18 were evaluable for toxicity and response. Although no DLT, one patient had transient grade 3 hemolytic uremic syndrome during cycle 3 without significant symptoms or need for therapy. Of the 18 patients, 15 (83%) responded, 14 (78%) achieved CR and 13 (72%) MRD-free CR by blood and bone marrow (BM) aspirate flow cytometry and BM biopsy immunohistochemistry. MRD-free CRs included one with HCLv. Even though Moxe vial expiration prevented enrollment of the 26 planned patients needed for a 1-sided p-value <0.025 compared to Moxe alone where 30 (47%) of 64 phase 1-3 patients achieved MRD-free CR, the 53% relative improvement with MoxeR achieved a 1-sided p-value of 0.05. Compared to 29 (48%) of 61 evaluable phase 1-3 patients who received Moxe alone with high ADA levels, 4 (29%) of 18 patients had high ADA levels to MoxeR (p=0.048). At 14-51 (median 35.3) months of follow-up, all but 2 of 13 MRD-free CRs are continuing, with relapse-free survival 14-45 (median 34.5) months. Conclusions: Despite enrolling slightly fewer patients than planned, MoxeR was safe and more effective than Moxe alone at achieving MRD-free CR, probably due to lower immunogenicity and faster reduction of HCL/HCLv tumor burden. Since non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) cells from patients are sensitive to Moxe like HCL, MoxeR could be tested after NHL treatment to convert MRD+ to MRD-free CRs. Clinical trial information: NCT03805932 .

Safety and efficacy of lisaftoclax, a novel BCL-2 inhibitor, in combination with azacitidine in patients with treatment-naïve or relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

6541 Background: Investigational agent lisaftoclax (Lisa) was shown in preclinical findings to synergistically induce apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, we present follow up safety and efficacy data from a phase 1b/2 study evaluating Lisa + azacitidine (AZA) in adults with AML. Methods: Elderly (≥ 75 years)/unfit treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML (≥ 18 years) patients (pts) were enrolled. Lisa (400/600/800 mg) was administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles (a daily ramp up schedule was used for Lisa to prevent tumor lysis syndrome, TLS) combined with AZA (75 mg/m2/day on D1-7). Results: As of January 25, 2024, 76 AML pts were enrolled (R/R [n = 37]; elderly/unfit TN [n = 39]). The median (range) age was 66 (20-81) years and 61.8% of pts were male. All pts treated with Lisa + AZA reported TEAEs, with 89.5% Grade 3/4 AEs; and 43.4% SAEs. Common TEAEs (≥ 30%) included neutropenia (60.5%), thrombocytopenia (60.5%), diarrhea (42.1%), hypokalemia (40.8%), pyrexia (35.5%), and vomiting (30.3%). Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs reported in ≥ 10% of pts were neutropenia (57.9%), thrombocytopenia (50.0%), anemia (27.6%), pneumonia (17.1%), and febrile neutropenia (10.5%). No TLS was reported, and the 30-/60-day mortality rates were 1.3% and 3.9%, respectively. In pts with R/R AML treated with Lisa + AZA, the overall response ([ORR] = CR + CRi + morphologic leukemia-free state [MLFS] + PR) and composite complete remission (CRc = CR + CRi) rates were 72.7% and 45.5%, respectively. In the 600 mg cohort (n = 30), ORR and CRc were 76.7% and 50.0%; the median (range) duration of treatment (mDoT), 3.8 (0.8‒15.4) month (mo); median time to CRc (mTTCRc), 2.5 (95% CI, 1.5-6.1) mo; median PFS was 10.2 (95% CI, 6.5-NR) mo; and median OS was 14.7 (95% CI, 7.8-NR) mo. Among 39 pts with TN AML treated with Lisa + AZA, ORR and CRc were 64.1% and 51.3%, respectively (Table). In the 600 mg cohort (n = 29), mDoT was 3.3 (1.0- 9.9) mo; mTTCRc was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.2-3.3) mo; median PFS was not reached (3.5, NR). 600 mg of Lisa + AZA was established as the recommended phase 2 dose. Conclusions: Our data support an emerging role for this new BCL-2 inhibitor Lisa combined with AZA for the treatment of elderly/unfit TN and R/R AML pts, especially with low early mortality and promising mPFS. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind clinical study is in progress to determine whether Lisa + AZA improves OS in elderly/unfit pts with AML. *HW, XW, and YL are co-first authors. Clinical trial information: NCT04501120 . [Table: see text]

A propensity score–matched comparison of cytoreductive strategies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia presenting with hyperleukocytosis.

e18509 Background: Hyperleukocytosis (white blood cell (WBC) count greater than 100x109), which may lead to the clinical entity of leukostasis, is a hematologic emergency present at diagnosis in 18% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). There is controversy regarding the appropriate cytoreductive strategy, which may include cytoreductive chemotherapy, hydroxyurea, and/or leukapheresis. The American society for apheresis (ASFA) released guidelines in 2023 making leukapheresis a Category III recommendation, however significant heterogeneity and methodologic flaws exist in the evidence used to make these recommendations. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 58 patients at Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center between 2017 and 2023 who received either hydroxyurea alone (n=35) or both hydroxyurea and leukapheresis (n=23) for hyperleukocytosis at time of presentation for AML diagnosis was performed. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), European LeukemiaNet (ELN) risk stratification, and WBC count prior to cytoreduction were collected. Comparisons of complete remission rates (CR/CRi), 30- and 60-day mortality, median overall survival (OS), and rates of therapy-induced tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier, Fisher’s exact, Mann-Whitney tests, respectively on a propensity score matched cohort to account for differing initial WBC counts between the treatment groups. Results: PSM was used to match presenting WBC counts between the two cohorts. Other baseline characteristics including median age (65y v. 60y), median CCI (5 v. 4), ELN adverse risk rate (31.53% v. 26.1%) did not differ after PSM. No significant difference was found between the hydroxyurea group compared to the hydroxyurea and leukapheresis group, respectively, when analyzing for rate of CR/CRi (36.5% v. 43.5%), 30-day mortality (10.5% v. 17.3%), 60-day mortality (10.5% v. 34.8%), median OS (7.77 mo. v. 8.07 mo.), or rates of DIC (10.5% vs. 8.7%) and therapy induced TLS (0% v. 0%). Conclusions: Patients who received hydroxyurea alone had similar outcomes when compared to the combined treatment group with respect to median OS, CR/CRi, and mortality rates. These results are notable given that leukapheresis is not available at many medical centers and is a resource-heavy procedure, and especially so in light of new ASFA guideline changes. However, these results reflect the laboratory entity of hyperleukocytosis rather than the clinical entity of leukostasis. Further work is ongoing to assess impact of cytoreductive strategies in leukostasis in AML, and among different cytogenetic and molecular subtypes. Decisions for leukapheresis or other cytoreductive strategies should be made on a case-by-case decision at an experienced center when possible.

A retrospective comparison of abbreviated course “7+7” vs standard hypomethylating agent plus venetoclax doublets in older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

6507 Background: Hypomethylating agent (HMA) plus venetoclax (VEN) regimens are standard of care in older/chemotherapy ineligible patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). While the VEN label recommends continuous 28-day cycles, shortened VEN durations may mitigate cytopenias and improve tolerability. It is unknown how shorter VEN cycles compare to standard HMA+VEN in terms of efficacy/safety. Methods: We performed a retrospective comparison of patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML treated with azacitidine (AZA) x 7 days plus VEN x 7 days (“7+7” regimen) at 7 French centers (n=82, Willekens, ASH 2022) vs patients treated with standard dose HMA+VEN (s-HMA/VEN) at a US center (n=173), generally consisting of 21-28 days of VEN. We compared composite complete remission rate (CRc, consisting of CR + CRi), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and myelosuppression between regimens. Results: Baseline characteristics are shown in the table. The s-HMA-VEN group consisted of 10-day decitabine (DAC) in 59% with the remaining patients receiving 5-day DAC or 7-day AZA. The CRc rate was similar; 72% with “7+7” vs 71% with s-HMA/VEN (p=0.89). The CR rate was 57% with “7+7” vs 55% with s-HMA/VEN (p=0.72). Median cycles to first response was 1 in both groups, however 42% of responders on “7+7” required more than 1 cycle for first response whereas almost all responders on s-HMA-VEN (99%) had a first response after cycle 1. Median cycles to best response was 2 with “7+7” vs 1 with s-HMA-VEN (p=0.02). 4-week mortality was similar (2% with “7+7”, 6% with s-HMA-VEN; p=0.24). 8-week mortality was higher with s-HMA-VEN (17%) compared to “7+7” (6%) (p=0.02). The median OS was 11.2 months (2-year 28%) with “7+7” vs 10.1 months (2-year 33%) with s-HMA/VEN (p=0.93). Outcomes stratified by molecular groups will be updated at the meeting. Fewer patients required platelet transfusions during cycle 1 with “7+7” compared to s-HMA/VEN (62% vs 77%, p=0.01). The cycle 1 rates of neutropenic fever and red cell transfusion requirements were similar. Conclusions: Acknowledging the limitations of a retrospective comparison across multiple centers, we did not observe a signal for a difference in efficacy between "7+7" vs standard VEN-based HMA doublets in ND-AML. The “7+7” regimen was associated with lower platelet transfusion requirements and lower 8-week mortality. [Table: see text]

Evaluation of treatment outcomes with CPX-351 in adults with AML: A meta-analysis.

6540 Background: CPX-351 is a liposomal formulation of cytarabine and daunorubicin which has shown survival benefit when compared to 7+3 in older adults with myelodysplasia-related (AML-MRC) and therapy-related AML (t-AML). Aiming to investigate the clinical efficacy of CPX-351 against 7+3 in adults with AML, we performed a meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search with controlled vocabulary encompassing AML, CPX-351 and 7+3 was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane on November 1, 2023 with no search restrictions. 3461 were found; 2581 were left after duplicates were removed using Mendeley 1.19.8. Remaining records were imported into Rayyan and independently screened by 2 reviewers. 8 studies were included in the analysis as they provided data for both CPX-351 and 7+3. 17 studies only including CPX-351 were identified. RevMan was used to analyze the Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI), derived from random effects (RE) model with Mantel-Haenszel (MH) method. Results: We identified 8 studies comparing CPX-351 to 7+3, encompassing a total of 1368 total patients: 44% (604/1368) received CPX-351, 56% (764/1368) received 7+3. Most patients had AML-MRC or t-AML. The median age in the CPX-351 group was 66 (range 58-67) and in the 7+3 group was 67 (range 58-67). The median overall survival grossly favored CPX-351 with 10.3 months (range 8.8-22 months) compared to 6.2 months (range 4.6-12 months) in 7+3. The OR of complete remission (CR) for CPX-351 versus 7+3 using the RE model was 1.66 (CI=1.15-2.39, p=0.006, I2=55%). Similarly, the OR of patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for CPX-351 versus 7+3 was 1.52 (CI=1.01-2.30, p=0.05, I2=47%). Including the additional 17 studies with CPX-351, the overall CR rate for all patients was 49%. Average 30-day mortality with CPX-351 was 4.9%. Conclusions: From our analysis, the OR of attaining CR and HSCT were shown to be significantly improved with CPX-351 when compared to conventional 7+3 chemotherapy in adult patients with AML. Both groups had similar median age, and patients in the CPX-351 arm had longer median overall survival. Our meta-analysis highlights that while CPX-351 achieves CR/HSCT at a higher rate than 7+3, data in younger populations (<60 years old) and patients with de novo AML are sparse. Heterogeneity between studies and lack of mutational analysis are limitations of our study. [Table: see text]

A prospective study of all-trans retinoic acid plus venetoclax and azacitidine in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

6545 Background: Over the decade, anthracycline and cytarabine-based intensive chemotherapy remains the standard of care for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but is hampered by serious toxicities like myelosuppression, increased transfusion requirement and disappointing clinical outcomes among the so-called poor-prognosis AML subsets. BCL-2 inhibitor plus azacitidine (AZA) has become a preferred treatment for AML, but the remission rate and overall survival (OS) are suboptimal. Apart from hematologic toxicities, 70.0% of patients were RBC transfusion dependent and 58.6% were platelet transfusion dependent. At present, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) is used as a differentiation drug, and there is no combination regimen with BCL-2 inhibitor. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ATRA plus venetoclax and AZA for newly diagnosed AML. Methods: This study enrolled 35 patients (≥18 years) with newly diagnosed AML between 2022 and 2023. For induction, patients received AZA (75 mg/m²) from Day 1 to 7, venetoclax at a target dose of 400 mg/d from Day 2 to 10, and ATRA (45 mg/m²/d) from Day 12 to 28 of each 28-day cycle for up to 2 cycles or until disease progression. Patients who achieved complete remission (CR) after two cycles of induction therapy received bone marrow transplantation or consolidation at their own discretion. For consolidation, patients received ATRA (45 mg/m²/d) from Day 1 to 21 and AZA (75 mg/m²) from Day 1 to 7 of each 28-day cycle for up to 4 cycles or until disease progression. For maintenance, patients received ATRA (45 mg/m²/d) for 21 days per cycle plus AZA (75 mg/m²). Maintenance therapy was given every 3 months until disease progression and ATRA was provided during intermissions. The primary endpoint was the composite CR rate (CR and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery) at the end of cycle 1 of inductive therapy. Results: As of now, the composite CR rate reached 74% (26/35) and the objective response rate reached 91% (32/35). The composite CR was 73% (11/15) in the adverse risk group and 75% (15/20) in the favorable-intermediate risk group at the end of cycle 1. Thirty-three patients entered cycle 2. The cumulative composite CR rate reached 91%(30/33) after 2 cycles of induction therapy. The median event-free survival was 390 days, and the median OS was 573 days. Platelet transfusion independence occurred in 17% (6/35) patients in cycle 1 and 73% (24/33) in cycle 2. Furthermore, 20% (7/35) and 73% (24/33) patients were RBC transfusion independent in cycle 1 and 2, respectively. Any-grade infections occurred in 74% (26/35) patients, including 12 before admission. Conclusions: The treatment regimen achieved a high composite CR rate and was well tolerated, with reduced hematologic toxicities in cycle 2 of induction therapy. Both adverse risk and favorable-intermediate risk patients benefited from the regimen, which holds promise for treating AML in adult patients. Clinical trial information: NCT05654194 .

A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy of low-dose olanzapine in preventing nausea and vomiting associated with oxaliplatin-based and irinotecan-based chemotherapy

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy of a 5 mg dosage of olanzapine in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) among female patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal tract tumors.MethodsPatients undergoing the oxaliplatin/irinotecan chemotherapy regimen were enrolled in this prospective controlled study. The olanzapine group received a 5 mg dosage of olanzapine along with palonosetron and dexamethasone, while the control group received a standard two-combination regimen consisting of dexamethasone and palonosetron. The primary endpoints included the total protection (TP) rates for the entire age group and the subgroup aged 60 years and above. Secondary endpoints encompassed the total protection rates during the acute and delayed phases within the two age brackets, as well as the total control (TC) rates and complete remission (CR) rates across all three phases (total, acute, and delayed). Additionally, the study involved the assessment of quality of life and the collection of adverse events associated with the interventions.Results1) Regarding the primary endpoint, the total phase TP rates within both the entire age group and the age group exceeding 60 years demonstrated superiority in the olanzapine group when compared to the control group (66.7% vs 37.25%, P = 0.003; 68.8% vs 44.4%, P = 0.044). 2) In terms of secondary endpoints, the olanzapine group exhibited superior acute phase TP rates in both age brackets when compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The olanzapine group also demonstrated higher delayed-phase TP rates, TC rates across all three phases, and CR rates within the two age brackets, although the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the quality of life in the olanzapine group surpassed that of the control group for both age brackets (P < 0.05), characterized by enhanced appetite and a higher incidence of drowsiness in the patients treated with olanzapine when compared to those in the control group (P < 0.05).ConclusionOlanzapine can enhance CINV induced by MEC regimen in female patients across all age groups, including the elderly, and therefore improve the quality of life for these patients.Clinical Trial Registration:https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier: ChiCTR20000368269, 25/08/2020.

Outcomes of patients aged ≥26 years with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in ZUMA-3 and historical trials

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy approved in the USA and European Union (EU) for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL; aged ≥26 years in EU). Here, outcomes for patients with R/R B-ALL aged ≥26 years in ZUMA-3 treated with brexu-cel were compared with historical standard-of-care (SOC) therapy. After median follow-up of 26.8 months, the overall complete remission (CR) rate among patients treated with brexu-cel in Phase 2 (N = 43) was 72% and median overall survival (OS) was 25.4 months (95% CI, 15.9-NE). Median OS was improved in Phase 2 patients versus matched historical SOC-treated patients. Compared with aggregate historical trial data, Phase 1 and 2 patients had improved OS versus blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and chemotherapy in a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study. These data demonstrate clinical benefit of brexu-cel relative to SOC in patients ≥26 years with R/R B-ALL.

#2682 Evaluation of clinical, pathological findings and treatment outcomes of patients diagnosed with lupus nephritis: a single center experience

Abstract Background and Aim Renal involvement of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is known as lupus nephritis (LN). The prognosis of lupus patients with LN is worse than those without kidney involvement. Renal survival can be improved in patients with lupus nephritis with appropriate and timely treatment. The aim of our study is to compare the clinical and pathological findings of patients diagnosed with LN in our clinic by renal biopsy, the results of the treatment applied in our center, and renal survival with the literature. Method The local ethical committee approved the study design (date: 04/10/2021; reference number: 121/07) and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Forty-four patients diagnosed with lupus nephritis between January 2012 and January 2021 in the Nephrology Department of Ankara Dıskapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Education and Research Hospital were enrolled in this study. Patient data were analyzed retrospectively. Exclusion criteria were as follows: 1) Patients under 18 years of age, 2) patients with follow-up of period less than 6 months and who did not attend regular follow-ups, 3) patients with connective tissue diseases other than SLE. Results The mean age of the study population was 36.0 ± 10.8, and the majority were female. All patients had proteinuria at diagnosis. Class IV LN was the most common (36.4%). Majority of the patients were in the proliferative LN group (65.9%). A significant difference was found between patients diagnosed with proliferative LN (n = 29) and non-proliferative LN (n = 15) in terms of high serum creatinine levels, low serum complement, presence of anti-dsDNA antibodies and active urinary sediment with proliferative LN (p = 0.021, p = 0.024, p = 0.008, p = 0.008). Treatment responses at 6 and 12 months are shown in Table 1. A significant difference was found between the patients who were in complete remission (n = 16) at 12 months and those who were not in remission (n = 27) in terms of low systolic blood pressure and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.008, p = 0.016). It was observed that most of the patients who were not in complete remission at 12 months were in the proliferative LN group (p = 0.024). There was no significant difference in the partial and complete remission rates at 6 and 12 months between the group receiving steroids + cyclophosphamide (n = 14) and the group receiving steroid + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 15) in the initial treatment of proliferative LN (p&amp;gt;0.05). In the group taking MMF treatment (n = 15) had a shorter time to reach complete remission than the group taking cyclophosphamide treatment, and it was statistically significant (Table 2) (p = 0.048). It was found that end-stage renal disease (ESRD) developed in 9% of the patients and 2 patients died during followed up period. Recurrence was detected in 8 patients, and it was observed that more than half of the patients with relapse could not achieve complete remission at 12 months. Patients with relapse had higher systolic blood pressure and serum total cholesterol level at the time of diagnosis compared to patients without recurrence (p = 0.013, p = 0.045). In addition, patients with relapse were found to have a higher level of proteinuria at the time of diagnosis (p = 0.036). Conclusion Lupus nephritis remains an important source of morbidity and mortality for SLE patients. SLE patients should be regularly examined for renal involvement. About 10-20% of patients diagnosed with lupus nephritis develop ESRD. Early diagnosis of LN and initiating appropriate treatment when diagnosed without delay is important for renal and patient survival. Although there were some different results, most of the statistically significant data in our study were found to be compatible with the existing literature. However, these data need to be confirmed by studies with high patient participation.

#1602 Lupus nephritis multidisciplinary consultation: a new strategy for increasingly complex patients

Abstract Background and Aims Lupus nephritis (LN) is a major course of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), best managed by a multidisciplinary group. Recent management advances require greater collaboration between specialists and individualized treatments in severe cases. Method We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of a cohort of incident patients which were diagnosed with LN between 2015 and 2022 and began follow-up in the multidisciplinary rheumatology and nephrology consultation of our institution. Clinical and analytical characteristics at diagnosis and during follow-up were studied. The primary endpoint was complete remission rate at follow-up end, according to GLOSEN (Grupo de Estudio de Enfermedades Glomerulares de la SEN) [1] criteria. Changes in immunosuppression schemes over time were studied. Results 26 patients (92.3% women) were included. Median age at SLE diagnosis was 30.5 years [Interquartile range (IQR) 23.7 – 44.2]. Most patients were Hispanic (14 patients, 53.8%). Median time between SLE and LN diagnosis was 21 months (IQR 0-129 months). In 9 patients (34.6%), SLE and LN onset happened simultaneously. Most common renal manifestation was hematuria, which appeared in 19 patients (73.1%). Median proteinuria was 1.83 g/d (IQR 0.88-2.92) and serum creatinine level, 0.69 (IQR 0.51-1.18). Hypocomplementemia (88.5%) and positivity to anti-DNA (69.2%) were common. Most frequent classes found in renal biopsies were IV (30.8%) and V (23.1%). At LN debut, SLEDAI score, which assesses SLE manifestations, had a median value of 16 (IQR 12-20). Mycophenolate mofetil (96.2%) was the main induction agent. Intravenous steroids were administered in 14 patients (53.8%) and the rest received steroids at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg/day. Addition of another therapy, mainly tacrolimus (6 patients, 23.1%) and belimumab (4 patients, 15.4%), was needed to achieve remission in 12 patients (46.2%). In 8 of them (66.6%), treatments were added within the first 6 months. These 12 patients had less chronicity in the biopsy (median chronicity index: 0 vs. 2; p 0.004) and had higher proteinuria (median 1.41 g/day vs. 0.4 g/day; p 0.001). Likewise, SLEDAI score at 3 months was significantly higher in these 12 patients than in the standard of care group (median SLEDAI score 13 vs. 8; p 0.016). No differences were found in 3 month serum creatinine (p 0.181) or 3 month hematuria (p 0.496) After a median follow-up of 47 months, 15 (57.7%) and 9 patients (34.6%) achieved complete and partial remission, respectively. No differences in percentages of remission were observed between the 2 groups. Steroids were withdrawn in 12 patients (46.2%). Median steroid dose at the end of follow-up was 5 mg (IQR 3-5). Conclusion In our LN cohort, higher SLEDAI and proteinuria indicated the need for an individualized approach. Collaboration between Rheumatology and Nephrology specialists is essential to identify patients with these needs.

#992 Protocol based on PLA2R1 epitope recognition is superior to standard protocol in achieving remission in PLA2R1-associated membranous nephropathy

Abstract Background and Aims Membranous nephropathy (MN) is a rare, but severe autoimmune disease affecting kidney glomeruli. Clinical evolution is variable, ranging from spontaneous remission to persistent nephrotic syndrome and kidney failure. The major autoantigen in MN is PLA2R1 protein associated with 50-70% of all cases. Patients may present antibodies against a single immunodominant CysR domain or may develop additional antibodies against CTLD1 and/or CTLD7 and/or CTLD8 domains of PLA2R1 defining a cascade immunization or epitope spreading. The mechanism of epitope spreading has been described in a variety of contexts: it can reinforce immune response to eliminate a pathogen, but can also be associated with the aggravation of autoantibody-mediated autoimmune pathologies. The value of this marker in the management of MN patients remains debated. Our initial study (confirmed on an independent cohort) has shown that the single domain recognition (non-spreader patients) is associated with a higher chance of spontaneous remission (45% vs 0.05% in GEMRITUX cohort) and a better response to treatment (100% of remission regardless of the dose of rituximab used). The patients with multi domain recognition (spreader patients) of CTLD1 and/or CTLD7 domains, on the other hand, have poor prognosis and are less likely to achieve remission requiring high doses of rituximab. Based on these studies we have proposed a personalized treatment protocol with either low or high dose Rituximab based on patients’ PLA2R1 epitope spreading status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of this personalized treatment in comparison to the established GEMRITUX protocol. Method A multicenter, randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was conducted in 12 French hospitals. Sixty-four consecutive patients with PLA2R1-related MN were randomly assigned to either the control group following the GEMRITUX protocol (symptomatic treatment for 6 months, two 375 mg/m2 rituximab infusions at month-6 in case of persistent nephrotic syndrome (NS)) or the personalized treatment (PMMN) group (patients with no epitope spreading at month-0 were treated as per GEMRITUX protocol, while patients with epitope spreading at month-0 or month-6 with persistent NS were treated immediately with two 1 g rituximab infusions). The primary study outcome was the rate of clinical remission at month-12. The secondary outcomes were complete and partial remission, immunological remission, proteinuria, albuminuria, serum creatinine, and PLA2R1 antibody titer. Results From 64 patients included, three were excluded from final analyses due to loss to follow-up. There was no difference in age, gender, albumin, UPCR, anti-PLA2R1 titer and the rate of PLA2R1 epitope spreading at baseline between the two groups. At M12, 34% of patients from the GEMRITUX group and 69% of patients from PMMN group achieved partial clinical remission (P = .0105) defined as UPCR &amp;lt; 3.5 g/g with a decrease greater than 50% from baseline; improvement or normalization of serum albumin; and increase of serum creatinine lower than 20%. While there was no difference in remission rate between the GEMRITUX group and PMMN group for patients with single domain recognition (38% vs 50%, respectively, P = .7107), multi-domain recognizers (spreaders) were more likely to achieve remission with personalized protocol (36% vs. 87%, P = .0078). The rate of complete clinical remission between the two experimental groups, defined as UPCR &amp;lt;0.3 g/g and normal albumin, was close to statistical significance (0% vs 16%, P = .0538). Conclusion Personalized treatment protocol based on the stratification of patients with PLA2R1-related MN according to their epitope spreading status, is superior to the standard GEMRITUX protocol in achieving partial clinical remission at 12 months. Patients with multiple domain recognition should be treated immediately with high doses of rituximab to increase their chances of remission.

#1162 Paraneoplastic podocytopathy in patients with solid cancer: clinical characteristics and new insights into pathophysiological processes about 21 cases

Abstract Background and Aims Minimal change disease (MCD) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) may occur in patients with solid cancer but this rare association has never been extensively investigated. Here, we report the first series of patients presenting this association, also named paraneoplastic podocytopathy with nephrotic syndrome (PPNS) . Previous study has demonstrated the specific induction in both podocytes and Reed-Sternberg cells of C-Maf Inducing Protein (CMIP) in patients with MCD and Hodgkin lymphoma. Here, we examined whether this molecular relationship was also relevant in patients developing PPNS in the setting of solid cancer. We have investigated the potential CMIP expression in kidney biopsies and in tumor tissues. Method We collected data from patients who presented with histologically proven cancer and concomitantly developed a nephrotic syndrome (± 3 months) related to MCD or FSGS Follow-up data were collected after 3, 6, 12 months and at last visit. We identified a control group of idiopathic nephrotic syndromes (INS) matched on sex, age and histological type, in order to compare the characteristics of these controls with patients with PPNS. Expression of CMIP was studied by immunohistochemistry and by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy on kidney biopsy and tumor samples. We used kidney biopsies from INS and tumors from patients without associated nephrotic syndrome as controls. Results Twenty-one PPNS patients and 21 controls with INS without cancer were identified. The median age of PPNS patients was higher (68 years) than usually observed in INS. Most of them (76%) had a MCD. A broad spectrum of cancers was found (bronchopulmonary, prostatic, colorectal…) . Baseline characteristics were similar between PPNS patients and INS controls, with a median urinary protein creatinine ratio of 865 and 900 mg/mmol, blood albumin t 15 and 15.3 g/L. Estimated glomerular filtration rate were 48 and 60 ml/min/1.73 m² respectively (no significant difference) . At presentation, PPNS patients were more likely to have hematuria (p = 0.031) , a lower median hemoglobin level than controls (p = 0.039) . Moreover, PPNS patients were less often treated with immunosuppressive drugs (p = 0.004) . After 12 months of follow-up, PPNS patients had a less favorable outcome than INS controls, with a mortality rate three times higher (30% vs 9.5%, p = 0.098) and a much lower rate of complete remission of nephrotic syndrome (25% vs 73.7%, p = 0.008, Table 1). CMIP labeling was performed on 13 tumor samples and 16 kidney biopsies in PPNS patients, and on 5 kidney biopsies with INS, and on 5 control tumor samples. Podocyte labeling of CMIP is observed on all but one kidney biopsy. CMIP labeling was positive on all case tumors, but only a scarce staining was detected in control patients with solid cancer without nephrotic syndrome (Fig. 1). In PPNS patients, confocal microscopy analysis on tumoral tissue showed high expression of CMIP in some epithelial cells and in immune infiltrating cells.. In addition, we found that CMIP was specifically express in CD4 T lymphocyte subset (Fig. 2), but not in CD20, FOXP3 or PD1 lymphocytes, defining a novel FOXP3−/PD1− CMIP high CD4+T lymphocyte subpopulation, within immune cell infiltrates. Conclusion We report the first series of patients with PPNS, who have a more severe renal and overall prognosis than controls. We show that patients with PPNS display higher induction of CMIP, both in the tumor and in podocytes. Strikingly, we identified within immune infiltrates a new subset of T-cell harboring a particular phenotype (CD4+, CMIPhigh, FOXP3−, PD1−) , which is not detected in patients with solid tumor without nephrotic syndrome and which could play a key role in the pathophysiology of PPNS.