Range For Young Men Research Articles

Testosterone Therapy for Men With Age-Related Low Testosterone: Tempest in a Teacup

Serum testosterone concentrations decrease in men with age, but benefits and risks of raising testosterone levels in older men remain controversial. In the T-Trials, a total of 790 men, age 65 and older, with a serum testosterone concentration of < 275 ng/dL and symptoms of sexual dysfunction, fatigue or physical dysfunction were randomized to either testosterone gel or placebo gel for 1 year. Treatment in the testosterone arm increased serum testosterone levels to the mid-normal range for young men. Testosterone replacement was associated with a significant increase in sexual activity (p < 0.001), libido and erectile function. In contrast, there was no improvement in vitality or physical function. Adverse findings included increases in non-calcified plaque formation and a higher rate of prostate events. In sum, testosterone treatment in older men was associated with modest benefits, while the risk on prostate and cardiovascular health remain unclear.

Teenage pregnancy prevention: the role of young men.

Although teenage pregnancy is declining in many parts of the world, it remains associated with considerable social, health, and economic outcomes. Pregnancy prevention efforts focus primarily on young women, with minimal attention to young men. This review highlights recent literature pertaining to the role of young men in pregnancy prevention. Young men have varying views on contraception as well as which partner(s) should be responsible for its use. Limited contraception knowledge reduces young men's sexual health communication as well as their contraception use. Healthcare providers play a major role as one of the main sources of sexual health information for young men, but there are gaps in young men's sexual health care so new guidelines have emerged. Recent literature highlights young men's range of views on contraception as well as their low sexual health knowledge and sexual health communication. To address teenage pregnancy and improve young men's overall wellness, healthcare providers should routinely address sexual health. Healthcare providers may use our newly proposed acronym, HIS BESTT, (Hello. Initiate. Sexual health assessment. Both condoms and female dependent methods. Examine genitals. STI screening. Talking to partner(s). Talking to parent(s) or guardians), to incorporate current clinical recommendations.

Adding liraglutide to lifestyle changes, metformin and testosterone therapy boosts erectile function in diabetic obese men with overt hypogonadism.

The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate whether adding liraglutide to lifestyle changes, metformin (Met) and testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), by means of improving weight and glycaemic control, could boost erectile function in type 2 diabetic obese men with overt hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction (ED) in a 'real-life setting'. Forty-three obese, diabetic and hypogonadal men (aged 45-59 years) were evaluated because of complaining about the recent onset of ED. They were subdivided into two groups according to whether hypogonadism occurred after puberty (G1; n = 30: 25 with dysfunctional hypogonadism and 5 with acquired hypogonadotropic hypogonadism) or before puberty (G2; n = 13: 10 with Klinefelter's syndrome and 3 with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism). Both G1 and G2 patients were given a combination of testosterone (T) [testosterone undecanoate (TU) 1000 mg/every 12 weeks] and Met (2000-3000 mg/day) for 1 year. In the poor responders (N) to this therapy in terms of glycaemic target (G1N: n = 16; G2N: n = 10), liraglutide (L) (1.2 μg/day) was added for a second year, while the good responders (Y) to T + Met (G1Y: 14/30 and G2Y: 3/13) continued this two drugs regimen therapy for another year. All patients were asked to fill in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF 15) questionnaire before starting TU plus Met (T1) and after 12 months (T2) and 24 months (T3) of treatment. Patients underwent a clinical examination and a determination of serum sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), total testosterone (T) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at T1, T2 and T3. At T2, each patient obtained an improvement of ED (p < 0.01) and of the metabolic parameters without reaching, however, the glycaemic goals [HbA1c = >7.5% (>58 mmol/mol)], while T turned out to be within the range of young men. L added to TU and Met regimen in G1N and G2N allowed these patients to reach not only the glycaemic target [HbA1c = <7.5% (<58 nmol/mol)] and a significant reduction in body weight (p < 0.01), but also a further increase in SHBG (p < 0.05) and T (p < 0.01) plasma levels as well as a significant increment of IIEF score (T3). Conversely, at T3 G1Y and G2Y, who received the combined therapy with TRT and Met for the second year, showed a partial failure of that treatment given that there was no improvement of the IIEF score and they showed a significant rise in serum HbA1c (p < 0.05) and weight (p < 0.04) compared with the assessments at T2. These results suggest that TRT could improve clinical and metabolic parameters in obese, type 2 diabetic men with ED and overt hypogonadism (independently of when T deficit occurred). Furthermore, in case of insufficient metabolic control the addition of L to TRT and Met regimen allows to achieve serum T levels in the range of healthy men, as well as to reach glycaemic target and to lower weight, leading to a considerable improvement of ED.

The Decline of Androgen Levels in Elderly Men and Its Clinical and Therapeutic Implications

Aging in men is accompanied by a progressive, but individually variable decline of serum testosterone production, more than 20% of healthy men over 60 yr of age presenting with serum levels below the range for young men. Albeit the clinical picture of aging in men is reminiscent of that of hypogonadism in young men and decreased testosterone production appears to play a role in part of these clinical changes in at least some elderly men, the clinical relevancy of the age-related decline in sex steroid levels in men has not been unequivocally established. In fact, minimal androgen requirements for elderly men remain poorly defined and are likely to vary between individuals. Consequently, borderline androgen deficiency cannot be reliably diagnosed in the elderly, and strict differentiation between "substitutive" and "pharmacological" androgen administration is not possible. To date, only a few hundred elderly men have received androgen therapy in the setting of a randomized, controlled study, and many of these men were not androgen deficient. Most consistent effects of treatment have been on body composition, but to date there is no evidence-based documentation of clinical benefits of androgen administration to elderly men with normal or moderately low serum testosterone in terms of diminished morbidity or of improved survival or quality of life. Until the long-term risk-benefit ratio for androgen administration to elderly is established in adequately powered trials of longer duration, androgen administration to elderly men should be reserved for the minority of elderly men who have both clear clinical symptoms of hypogonadism and frankly low serum testosterone levels.

Short-Term Effects of Intramuscular and Transdermal Testosterone on Bone Turnover, Prostate Symptoms, Cholesterol, and Hematocrit in Men Over Age 70 with Low Testosterone Levels

The objective of the study was to determine whether short-term testosterone administration to older men with low bioavailable testosterone would have any immediate adverse effects, especially on the symptoms of benign prostate hyperplasia, preliminary to embarking on a long-term study of testosterone treatment. Transdermal and intramuscular testosterone were compared to determine whether there were any rapid changes in markers of bone formation or resorption with either testosterone administration. We undertook a non-randomized trial of 9 weeks intervention with either intramuscular testosterone, transdermal testosterone or neither followed by a 9-week observation period. Twenty-seven men over age 70 years with no medical conditions known to affect bone turnover and total testosterone levels below 350 ng/dl (normal range 350–1230 ng/dl) or bioavailable testosterone levels below 128 ng/dl (normal range 128–430 ng/dl) received either testosterone via transdermal patch (TP; two 2.5 mg patches/d), intramuscular testosterone enanthate (IM; 200 mg every 3 weeks) or no testosterone for 9 weeks of treatment followed by a 9 week observation period. Nine men were enrolled in each group. The mean age of the men was 74 ± 3 years (range 70–83 years). While all men receiving testosterone treatment increased levels above their own baseline, only 6 of 9 men receiving transdermal testosterone achieved bioavailable testosterone levels in the normal range for young men. Neither treatment group demonstrated changes in estradiol levels. No side effects were reported using the intramuscular testosterone while 5/9 men using transdermal testosterone developed a rash. There were no significant changes in markers of bone resorption or formation in either testosterone treatment group. There were no ill effects on prostate size, symptoms or prostate specific antigen level. PSA levels of 1.5 ± 0.7 ng/dl and 1.6 ± 0.7 ng/dl in the TP and IM groups, respectively, were 2.0 ± 1.0 ng/dl and 1.8 ± 0.9 ng/dl following treatment. Cholesterol profiles were also not affected by either transdermal or intramuscular testosterone. Similarly hemoglobin and hematocrit remained unchanged in men receiving either testosterone preparation.