Abstract Background Circumferential pulmonary veins ablation (CPVA) with posterior wall isolation (PWI) using radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is gaining increasing interest in terms of safety and efficacy. Purpose To compare procedural data and efficacy between two radiofrequency ablation protocols for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF): very high power-short duration (vHPSD) ablation using a novel temperature-controlled ablation catheter and Ablation Index (AI) guided RFCA using traditional contact-force catheter. Methods This single center prospective study enrolled 75 consecutive patients (Group 1) with symptomatic PersAF undergoing RFCA using a novel contact-force catheter optimized for temperature-controlled ablation with microelectrodes and 6 thermocouples for real-time temperature monitoring during ablation. The vHPSD algorithm modulates power to maintain target temperature during these lesions (90 Watts, 4 s) in the posterior wall. RF delivery in anterior regions was performed in a temperature guided setting (1-45W, 45°C) to achieve a 500-550 AI. These patients were compared to 75 propensity matched patients (Group 2) undergoing PersAF ablation with traditional AI-guided ablation. Procedural data were compared between the two groups (Table 1). Procedural outcome was considered as loop recorder documented atrial arrhythmias recurrences and compared between the two groups. Results Seventy-five patients (69% male, 63.1±11.2 years old) underwent ablation with vHPSD protocol (Group 1). CPVA and PWI was achieved in all patients with total procedure and fluoroscopy times of 67.5±28.8 min and 4.5±2.8 min, respectively. After 12-month median follow-up, 57/75 patients (76%) were free from AF. Seventy-five propensity matched patients (69% male, 60.7±9.9 years old) have undergone ablation with standard contact-force catheter. CPVA and PWI was achieved in all patients with total procedure and fluoroscopy times of 81.99±20.5 min and 5.7±2.1 min, respectively. After 12-month median follow-up, 55/75 patients (73%) were free from AF. Procedural and fluoroscopy times were significantly lower in in Group 1 than in Group 2 (Table 1). AF recurrencies were comparable between the two groups as assessed with survival analysis (Figure 1, log-rank 0.509). There were no deaths or other severe periprocedural complications. Conclusions PWI on top of CPVA is effective in limiting arrhythmic recurrences following RFCA of PersAF. Compared to standard AI guided ablation, vHPSD protocol significantly reduces procedural time and fluoroscopy exposure. Clinical outcomes between the two protocols are similar.Figure 1