African Americans became increasingly mobile during early twentieth century, exemplified by Great Migration that began around 1910. Reflecting general anxiety about such racial mobility, March 2, 1911, issue of The Independent included an article about racial passing, Is a Not a Caucasian? Referring to downfall of a family whose part-black ancestry, unknown even to themselves, accidentally became public, anonymous author discusses stupidity and cruelty of one-drop law and advises all negroes to leave South and live people so that, as bleaching process goes on, conundrum will cease to concern them, When is a not a Caucasian? Despite author's insight into precarious nature of racial categories, article's logic is predicated on assumption of stable whiteness. On one hand, along with its title, article's rhetorical question Who knows where ... it [the family's tragedy] may strike next? emphasizes that any person can really be nonwhite. On other hand, to highlight stupidity and cruelty of supremacy, writer must posit an unquestionably pure-white man society's representative. Thus, concerning husband who annulled his marriage to an unwitting passer under Louisiana's infamous law against intermarriage, article states that [t]here was no question that he was a full Caucasian (479) despite its ongoing claim of endless questionability of pure whiteness. One finds such simultaneous refutation and affirmation of clear-cut racial classification in James Weldon Johnson's novel about passing published a year later, The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man (1912). As Samira Kawash points out, novel's scrutiny of racial binary even problematizes the simple 'black passing for white' logic of passing ... and its attendant model of race expression of a prior, embodied so that Ex-Coloured Man's relation to blackness is shown to be inauthentic his relation to whiteness; rather than being 'both black and white,' he is in fact neither black nor white (70). At same time, novel seems to contradict its own racial investigation when it draws plot development, dramatization, and closure from essentialist and binary-predicated assumption that Ex-Colored Man looks but is actually black. (1) Indeed, though character, with his endlessly fluid identity, cannot but feel he has never really been a Negro (Johnson, Autobiography 153), his narrative only suppresses this indeterminacy by beginning with a confession of the great secret of [his] life a passer (1), featuring those scenes that revolve around his alleged blackness (e.g., his dramatic first recognition of not being a scholar at elementary school [11]), and ending with a regret for abandoning black identity his birthright (154). (2) I argue that while Independent article's tacit belief in pure whiteness undermines its own racial critique, The Autobiography of an Ex-Colored Man utilizes narrator's same belief--and his resulting self-identification passing-white, that is, deviation from real, pure whiteness--to show how hegemony reproduces itself by limiting one's ability to speak outside of white/black binary opposition. (3) In other words, Johnson configures text so that, while Ex-Colored Man's body can put idea of whiteness into question, (4) character-narrator fails to convey this subversive potential because white-dominant system of order and hierarchy controls his approach not only to race but also to storytelling itself. Johnson signals this interconnection between racial hierarchy, narrative order, and white-dominant discourse through way Ex-Colored Man fictively stabilizes his indeterminate race--and, accordingly, story itself--to accommodate audience he (the Ex-Colored Man) has in mind. …
Read full abstract