Abstract BACKGROUND Disease control is an important treatment goal for Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The Communicating Needs and Features of Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Experiences (CONFIDE) study explored patient and healthcare professional perspectives on the experiences and impact of CD and UC-related symptoms on patients in the United States (US), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK), and Japan. Here, we explored the disease control perceptions among patients with CD or UC using the validated IBD-Control questionnaire. METHODS Online, quantitative, cross-sectional surveys were conducted among patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC, defined using criteria based on previous treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalization. IBD-Control is a patient-reported outcome measure with a 2-week recall period that assesses disease control. It consists of 13 questions and a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (worst control) to 100 (best control). The IBD-Control-8 score (used in this study) ranges from 0 (worst control) to 16 (best control) and is assessed based on 8 questions covering treatment domain and quality of life (pain/discomfort, interference with daily activities, symptoms disturbing sleep, fatigue, anxiety/depression). Higher scores indicate better disease control: ≥13 points for IBD-Control-8 score and ≥85 points for IBD-Control-VAS indicate quiescent IBD. Data were summarized descriptively using means and standard deviations (SD). RESULTS The analysis included 215 US (males [M]=55%, mean age:41 years), 547 European (M=55%, 38 years), and 99 Japanese (M=68%, 43 years) patients with CD and 200 US (M=62%, 40 years), 556 European (M=57%, 39 years), and 124 Japanese (M=70%, 49 years) patients with UC. Of these, 58% US, 63% European, and 87% Japanese patients with CD, and 77% US, 54% European, and 42% Japanese patients with UC were receiving advanced therapies at data collection. Mean (SD) IBD-Control-8 scores indicated inadequate disease control in all three geographies among patients with CD (US: 8.4 [4.2], Europe: 9.1 [4.0)], Japan: 10.4 [4.6]) and UC (US: 8.5 [4.4], Europe: 9.0 [3.9], Japan: 12.9 [3.5]) including for those receiving advanced therapies (Figure 1). These findings were supported by the mean (SD) IBD-Control-VAS scores (CD, US: 67.5 [21.8], Europe: 73.1 [20.9], Japan: 70.3 [21.1]; UC, US: 68.8 [22.0], Europe: 74.3 [19.7], Japan: 75.7 [19.0]). European country-level data are presented in Figure 2 (IBD-Control-8 score [range]: CD, 8.6–10.1, UC, 8.4–10.4; IBD-Control-VAS score [range]: CD, 67.6–76.9, UC, 72.1–76.6). CONCLUSIONS The IBD-Control questionnaire in patients with CD and UC in the US, Europe, and Japan suggests inadequately controlled disease despite the use of advanced therapies. These findings emphasize the need for improving disease control to enhance patients’ quality of life. Figure 1 Figure 2
Read full abstract