This paper presents some of the questions or difficulties quantitative researchers might have when reading or thinking about qualitative methods. These issues include whether qualitative data differ from anecdotes, the idea that qualitative research is nonexperimental and is purely descriptive, and the ‘borrowing’ of quantitative concepts and giving them qualitative names. These questions were explored through discussion with three qualitative researchers. All the researchers emphasised that an important function of qualitative research is to provide context. The issues are discussed and contrasted with similar difficulties with quantitative methods. The idea that quantitative researchers are interested in measuring psychological phenomena, whereas qualitative researchers are interested in the interpretation of phenomena is explored. It is concluded that bringing quantitative and qualitative researchers together as collaborators would allow for richer data and, perhaps, bring us closer to the ‘truth’.
Read full abstract