The primary objective of this collection of ten essays (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1994) is to present an overview of the Turkish industrialization experience for the period of 1980-90. The volume is a valuable source for readers who specialize in the field of development economics, and should serve as a basic reference for all subsequent work on Turkey. In a useful introduction the editor, Fikret Senses, summarizes the papers and discusses the important shift of emphasis in Turkish economic policy towards export-oriented industrialization (EOI) during the 1980s. This shift encompasses a change from import-substituting industrialization (ISI) to EOI accompanied by a stabilization and structural adjustment program (SSAP). The first three chapters make the volume more comprehensive by going beyond the Turkish case. They bring together observations about the industrialization experience of developing countries in the light of various economic development theories. Three main issues are addressed: 1) the complementarity of ISI and EOI, 2) whether small scale-industries can be seen as the first stage of higher-skilled, technology-intensive, large-scale industries, and 3) the role of the public sector in industrialization and growth. Chapter 2, by Frederick Nixson, studies ISI and EOI for the case of less developed countries (LDCs), and finds that the two can be complementary, with the state playing an important role in bolstering the foundations of an industrial economy. The contribution of Marxism to the establishment of ISI is quite controversial in the development economics literature. Nixson evaluates the influence of both neo-Marxism and classical-Marxism for the process of industrialization. While Nixson sees classical-Marxism as a positive contributor for ISI, especially for the start-up industries, he finds neo-Marxist ideas out of touch with today's reality. He also recommends to LDC policy makers that they fund required investment from export earning, and not use borrowed funds and financial aid for this purpose, nor for consumption. Alice Amsden investigates (in Chapter 3) whether developing countries were able to transform their industrial structure from lower-skill, small scale industry units to higher-skill, large industry units. She focuses specifically on Taiwan to show that without government guidance and its active support, small-scale industries in a free market environment cannot achieve industrialization. The subsequent seven chapters analyze the Turkish industrialization experience by comparing the pre-1980 to post 1980 macroeconomic policies. The manufacturing sector, with specific emphasis on trucking, textile and clothing, is also analyzed in some detail. In Chapter 4 John Weiss tests one of the oldest hypotheses in development economics, one that was popular among the policy makers of LDCs during the 1960s. It was the view that since government can accelerate both industrialization and growth, it should play a large role in the development process. He states that the extent of government involvement in terms of production and resource allocation depends on the macro-economic and political environment. Even though the recent experience of Eastern Europe and some socialist economies raise some questions about the efficiency and effectiveness of public sector involvement in industrialization, he sees public enterprises as a way of filling the investment gap or of inducing private sector participation. In the editor's essay (Chapter 5) the macroeconomic policies of pre 1980 and post 1980 Turkey are compared. He summarizes the Turkish ISI experience from a historical perspective and then lays out the positive and the negative results of EOI together with SSAP. He believes that SSAP combined with export incentives, have been effective in strengthening the role of the price mechanism in both production and resource allocation. But notes that manufacturing investment has been sadly lagging behind its pre-1980 levels. …
Read full abstract