AbstractFeedback loops for symbol timing recovery are an attractive solution for continuous transmission of data, where rapid acquisition is not so important as in burst‐mode systems. In this context, carrier‐independent non‐data‐aided (NDA) timing error detectors, operated at only one sample per symbol, can be a most interesting option. Assuming M‐ary PSK signals and focusing on a linearised loop model for analytical work, such an algorithm has been discussed already in the technical literature. On the other hand, the linear approach does not apply for larger deviations from the stable equilibrium point as they are encountered during initial acquisition. In this case, the detector characteristic (S‐curve) must be known. Since not available from the open literature, it is derived in this paper not only for PSK but for linear modulation schemes in general. The slope in the stable equilibrium point is given in closed form such that the linearised tracker can be specified immediately. Furthermore, it turned out that the complexity of the detector, but also the computation of both S‐curve and slope, is most simple for a special value of the additional design parameter characterizing the algorithm. Based on this, the self‐noise variance is derived in closed form. For M‐PSK schemes, it is proved that they experience no jitter floor due to pattern (data) noise. On the other hand, for non‐constant modulus signals, like QAM or APSK constellations, it is shown that the performance is proportional to the loop bandwidth. Finally, a detailed comparison with NDA maximum‐likelihood and Gardner algorithm, as standard method for carrier‐blind NDA tracking, is presented. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Read full abstract