Cohesin Protector Research Articles

Molecular mechanism and functional significance of Wapl interaction with the Cohesin complex

The ring-shaped Cohesin complex, consisting of core subunits Smc1, Smc3, Scc1, and SA2 (or its paralog SA1), topologically entraps two duplicated sister DNA molecules to establish sister chromatid cohesion in S-phase. It remains largely elusive how the Cohesin release factor Wapl binds the Cohesin complex, thereby inducing Cohesin disassociation from mitotic chromosomes to allow proper resolution and separation of sister chromatids. Here, we show that Wapl uses two structural modules containing the FGF motif and the YNARHWN motif, respectively, to simultaneously bind distinct pockets in the extensive composite interface between Scc1 and SA2. Strikingly, only when both docking modules are mutated, Wapl completely loses the ability to bind the Scc1-SA2 interface and release Cohesin, leading to erroneous chromosome segregation in mitosis. Surprisingly, Sororin, which contains a conserved FGF motif and functions as a master antagonist of Wapl in S-phase and G2-phase, does not bind the Scc1-SA2 interface. Moreover, Sgo1, the major protector of Cohesin at mitotic centromeres, can only compete with the FGF motif but not the YNARHWN motif of Wapl for binding Scc1-SA2 interface. Our data uncover the molecular mechanism by which Wapl binds Cohesin to ensure precise chromosome segregation.

Meiosis-specific decoupling of the pericentromere from the kinetochore.

The primary constriction site of the M-phase chromosome is an established marker for the kinetochore position, often used to determine the karyotype of each species. Underlying this observation is the concept that the kinetochore is spatially linked with the pericentromere where sister-chromatids are most tightly cohered. Here, we found an unconventional pericentromere specification with sister chromatids mainly cohered at a chromosome end, spatially separated from the kinetochore in Peromyscus mouse oocytes. This distal locus enriched cohesin protectors, such as the Chromosomal Passenger Complex (CPC) and PP2A, at a higher level compared to its centromere/kinetochore region, acting as the primary site for sister-chromatid cohesion. Chromosomes with the distal cohesion site exhibited enhanced cohesin protection at anaphase I compared to those without it, implying that these distal cohesion sites may have evolved to ensure sister-chromatid cohesion during meiosis. In contrast, mitotic cells enriched CPC only near the kinetochore and the distal locus was not cohered between sister chromatids, suggesting a meiosis-specific mechanism to protect cohesin at this distal locus. We found that this distal locus corresponds to an additional centromeric satellite block, located far apart from the centromeric satellite block that builds the kinetochore. Several Peromyscus species carry chromosomes with two such centromeric satellite blocks. Analyses on three Peromyscus species revealed that the internal satellite consistently assembles the kinetochore in both mitosis and meiosis, whereas the distal satellite selectively enriches cohesin protectors in meiosis to promote sister-chromatid cohesion at that site. Thus, our study demonstrates that pericentromere specification is remarkably flexible and can control chromosome segregation in a cell-type and context dependent manner.

Age-dependent loss of cohesion protection in human oocytes

Aneuploid human eggs (oocytes) are a major cause of infertility, miscarriage, and chromosomal disorders. Such aneuploidies increase greatly as women age, with defective linkages between sister chromatids (cohesion) in meiosis as a common cause. We found that loss of a specific pool of the cohesin protector protein, shugoshin 2 (SGO2), may contribute to this phenomenon. Our data indicate that SGO2 preserves sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis by protecting a "cohesin bridge" between sister chromatids. In human oocytes, SGO2 localizes to both sub-centromere cups and the pericentromeric bridge, which spans the sister chromatid junction. SGO2 normally colocalizes with cohesin; however, in meiosis II oocytes from older women, SGO2 is frequently lost from the pericentromeric bridge and sister chromatid cohesion is weakened. MPS1 and BUB1 kinase activities maintain SGO2 at sub-centromeres and the pericentromeric bridge. Removal of SGO2 throughout meiosis I by MPS1 inhibition reduces cohesion protection, increasing the incidence of single chromatids at meiosis II. Therefore, SGO2 deficiency in human oocytes can exacerbate the effects of maternal age by rendering residual cohesin at pericentromeres vulnerable to loss in anaphase I. Our data show that impaired SGO2 localization weakens cohesion integrity and may contribute to the increased incidence of aneuploidy observed in human oocytes with advanced maternal age.

The Caenorhabditis elegans Shugoshin regulates TAC-1 in cilia

The conserved Shugoshin (SGO) protein family is essential for mediating proper chromosome segregation from yeast to humans but has also been implicated in diverse roles outside of the nucleus. SGO’s roles include inhibiting incorrect spindle attachment in the kinetochore, regulating the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), and ensuring centriole cohesion in the centrosome, all functions that involve different microtubule scaffolding structures in the cell. In Caenorhabditis elegans, a species with holocentric chromosomes, SGO-1 is not required for cohesin protection or spindle attachment but appears important for licensing meiotic recombination. Here we provide the first functional evidence that in C. elegans, Shugoshin functions in another extranuclear, microtubule-based structure, the primary cilium. We identify the centrosomal and microtubule-regulating transforming acidic coiled-coil protein, TACC/TAC-1, which also localizes to the basal body, as an SGO-1 binding protein. Genetic analyses indicate that TAC-1 activity must be maintained below a threshold at the ciliary base for correct cilia function, and that SGO-1 likely participates in constraining TAC-1 to the basal body by influencing the function of the transition zone ‘ciliary gate’. This research expands our understanding of cellular functions of Shugoshin proteins and contributes to the growing examples of overlap between kinetochore, centrosome and cilia proteomes.

A role for Shugoshin in human cilia?

We have recently described a novel role for the conserved centromeric/kinetochore protein and cohesin protector, Shugoshin, in cilia of C. elegans. Worms are unusual in that the sole Shugoshin protein ( SGO-1 ) is dispensable for chromosome segregation but required for cilia function in fully differentiated sensory neurons. Depletion of sgo-1 leads to an array of sensory defects observed in other cilia mutants with a compromised diffusion barrier. Accordingly, SGO-1 loads to the base of cilia in sensory neurons and can be observed occupying the transition zone, the critical ciliary domain that regulates trafficking in and out of ciliary compartments. Here we start to address a potential conserved role in cilia for vertebrate Shugoshin by asking whether human Shugoshin can: (1) localize to cilia and (2) rescue defects due to Shugoshin depletion in C. elegans . Our preliminary results suggest that human Shugoshin is detectable in the cilia base but show limited functional conservation when expressed in C. elegans sensory neurons.

Effects of post-ovulatory aging on centromeric cohesin protection in murine MII oocytes.

PurposePost‐ovulatory aging causes a high frequency of aneuploidy during meiosis II in mouse oocytes, irrespective of maternal age. In this study, we evaluated the effects of post‐ovulatory oocyte aging on the protection of chromosomal cohesion involved in aneuploidy and verified the relationship between PP2A or SGO2 expression and the phosphorylation level of REC8 in oocytes.MethodsMurine ovulated oocytes were incubated for 6 or 12 h in vitro after collection and denoted as the aged group. The oocytes examined immediately after collection were used as the control group. Immunofluorescent staining was used to detect the localization of PP2A, SGO2, BUB1, AURORA B, and MAD2 in the chromosomal centromere. Immunoblotting was used to quantify the expression of proteins describe above and REC8 in the oocytes.ResultsPP2A expression involved in the de‐phosphorylation of REC8 decreased over time in oocytes, suggesting a deficiency in PP2A in centromeres. This indicated an increase in the level of phosphorylated REC8, which destabilizes centromeric cohesion in oocytes. In contrast, SGO2 expression was significantly high in aged oocytes.ConclusionsThe findings show that post‐ovulatory aging destabilizes the centromeric cohesin protection in oocytes and can cause aneuploidy, which is often observed in aged oocytes during meiosis II.

Loss of sister kinetochore co-orientation and peri-centromeric cohesin protection after meiosis I depends on cleavage of centromeric REC8.

SummaryProtection of peri-centromeric (periCEN) REC8 cohesin from Separase and sister kinetochore (KT) attachment to microtubules emanating from the same spindle pole (co-orientation) ensures that sister chromatids remain associated after meiosis I. Both features are lost during meiosis II, resulting in sister chromatid disjunction and the production of haploid gametes. By transferring spindle-chromosome complexes (SCCs) between meiosis I and II in mouse oocytes, we discovered that both sister KT co-orientation and periCEN cohesin protection depend on the SCC, and not the cytoplasm. Moreover, the catalytic activity of Separase at meiosis I is necessary not only for converting KTs from a co- to a bi-oriented state but also for deprotection of periCEN cohesion, and cleavage of REC8 may be the key event. Crucially, selective cleavage of REC8 in the vicinity of KTs is sufficient to destroy co-orientation in univalent chromosomes, albeit not in bivalents where resolution of chiasmata may also be required

Kinetochore individualization in meiosis I is required for centromeric cohesin removal in meiosis II

Partitioning of the genome in meiosis occurs through two highly specialized cell divisions, named meiosis I and meiosis II. Step‐wise cohesin removal is required for chromosome segregation in meiosis I, and sister chromatid segregation in meiosis II. In meiosis I, mono‐oriented sister kinetochores appear as fused together when examined by high‐resolution confocal microscopy, whereas they are clearly separated in meiosis II, when attachments are bipolar. It has been proposed that bipolar tension applied by the spindle is responsible for the physical separation of sister kinetochores, removal of cohesin protection, and chromatid separation in meiosis II. We show here that this is not the case, and initial separation of sister kinetochores occurs already in anaphase I independently of bipolar spindle forces applied on sister kinetochores, in mouse oocytes. This kinetochore individualization depends on separase cleavage activity. Crucially, without kinetochore individualization in meiosis I, bivalents when present in meiosis II oocytes separate into chromosomes and not sister chromatids. This shows that whether centromeric cohesin is removed or not is determined by the kinetochore structure prior to meiosis II.

Reductional Meiosis I Chromosome Segregation Is Established by Coordination of Key Meiotic Kinases

SummaryMeiosis produces gametes through a specialized, two-step cell division, which is highly error prone in humans. Reductional meiosis I, where maternal and paternal chromosomes (homologs) segregate, is followed by equational meiosis II, where sister chromatids separate. Uniquely during meiosis I, sister kinetochores are monooriented and pericentromeric cohesin is protected. Here, we demonstrate that these key adaptations for reductional chromosome segregation are achieved through separable control of multiple kinases by the meiosis-I-specific budding yeast Spo13 protein. Recruitment of Polo kinase to kinetochores directs monoorientation, while independently, cohesin protection is achieved by containing the effects of cohesin kinases. Therefore, reductional chromosome segregation, the defining feature of meiosis, is established by multifaceted kinase control by a master regulator. The recent identification of Spo13 orthologs, fission yeast Moa1 and mouse MEIKIN, suggests that kinase coordination by a meiosis I regulator may be a general feature in the establishment of reductional chromosome segregation.

Spo13 prevents premature cohesin cleavage during meiosis.

Background: Meiosis produces gametes through two successive nuclear divisions, meiosis I and meiosis II. In contrast to mitosis and meiosis II, where sister chromatids are segregated, during meiosis I, homologous chromosomes are segregated. This requires the monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores and the loss of cohesion from chromosome arms, but not centromeres, during meiosis I. The establishment of both sister kinetochore mono-orientation and cohesin protection rely on the budding yeast meiosis I-specific Spo13 protein, the functional homolog of fission yeast Moa1 and mouse MEIKIN. Methods: Here we investigate the effects of loss of SPO13 on cohesion during meiosis I using a live-cell imaging approach. Results: Unlike wild type, cells lacking SPO13 fail to maintain the meiosis-specific cohesin subunit, Rec8, at centromeres and segregate sister chromatids to opposite poles during anaphase I. We show that the cohesin-destabilizing factor, Wpl1, is not primarily responsible for the loss of cohesion during meiosis I. Instead, premature loss of centromeric cohesin during anaphase I in spo13 Δ cells relies on separase-dependent cohesin cleavage. Further, cohesin loss in spo13 Δ anaphase I cells is blocked by forcibly tethering the regulatory subunit of protein phosphatase 2A, Rts1, to Rec8. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that separase-dependent cleavage of phosphorylated Rec8 causes premature cohesin loss in spo13 Δ cells.

An interplay between Shugoshin and Spo13 for centromeric cohesin protection and sister kinetochore mono-orientation during meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Meiosis is a specialized cell division process by which haploid gametes are produced from a diploid mother cell. Reductional chromosome segregation during meiosis I (MI) is achieved by two unique and conserved events: centromeric cohesin protection (CCP) and sister kinetochore mono-orientation (SKM). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a meiosis-specific protein Spo13 plays a role in both these centromere-specific events. Despite genome-wide association of Spo13, we failed to detect its function in global processes such as cohesin loading, cohesion establishment and homologs pairing. While Shugoshin (Sgo1) and protein phosphatase 2A (PP2ARts1) play a central role in CCP, it is not fully understood whether Spo13 functions in the process through a Sgo1- PP2ARts1-dependent or -independent mechanism. To delineate this and to find the relative contribution of each of these proteins in CCP and SKM, we meticulously observed the sister chromatid segregation pattern in the wild type, sgo1Δ, rts1Δ and spo13Δ single mutants and in their respective double mutants. We found that Spo13 protects centromeric cohesin through a Sgo1- PP2ARts1-independent mechanism. To our surprise, we observed a hitherto unknown role of Sgo1 in SKM. Further investigation revealed that Sgo1-mediated recruitment of aurora kinase Ipl1 to the centromere facilitates monopolin loading at the kinetochore during MI. Hence, this study uncovers the role of Sgo1 in SKM and demonstartes how the regulators (Sgo1, PP2ARts1, Spo13) work in a coordinated manner to achieve faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis, the failure of which leads to aneuploidy and birth defects.

Mps1 kinase-dependent Sgo2 centromere localisation mediates cohesin protection in mouse oocyte meiosis I

A key feature of meiosis is the step-wise removal of cohesin, the protein complex holding sister chromatids together, first from arms in meiosis I and then from the centromere region in meiosis II. Centromeric cohesin is protected by Sgo2 from Separase-mediated cleavage, in order to maintain sister chromatids together until their separation in meiosis II. Failures in step-wise cohesin removal result in aneuploid gametes, preventing the generation of healthy embryos. Here, we report that kinase activities of Bub1 and Mps1 are required for Sgo2 localisation to the centromere region. Mps1 inhibitor-treated oocytes are defective in centromeric cohesin protection, whereas oocytes devoid of Bub1 kinase activity, which cannot phosphorylate H2A at T121, are not perturbed in cohesin protection as long as Mps1 is functional. Mps1 and Bub1 kinase activities localise Sgo2 in meiosis I preferentially to the centromere and pericentromere respectively, indicating that Sgo2 at the centromere is required for protection.

Casein Kinase 1 Coordinates Cohesin Cleavage, Gametogenesis, and Exit from M Phase in Meiosis II

Meiosis consists of DNA replication followed by two consecutive nuclear divisions and gametogenesis or spore formation. While meiosis I has been studied extensively, less is known about the regulation of meiosis II. Here we show that Hrr25, the conserved casein kinase 1δ of budding yeast, links three mutually independent key processes of meiosis II. First, Hrr25 induces nuclear division by priming centromeric cohesin for cleavage by separase. Hrr25 simultaneously phosphorylates Rec8, the cleavable subunit of cohesin, and removes from centromeres the cohesin protector composed of shugoshin andthe phosphatase PP2A. Second, Hrr25 initiates thesporulation program by inducing the synthesis of membranes that engulf the emerging nuclei atanaphase II. Third, Hrr25 mediates exit from meiosisII by activating pathways that trigger the destruction of M-phase-promoting kinases. Thus, Hrr25 synchronizes formation of the single-copy genome with gamete differentiation and termination of meiosis.

Meikin is a conserved regulator of meiosis-I-specific kinetochore function.

The kinetochore is the crucial apparatus regulating chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Particularly in meiosis I, unlike in mitosis, sister kinetochores are captured by microtubules emanating from the same spindle pole (mono-orientation) and centromeric cohesion mediated by cohesin is protected in the following anaphase. Although meiotic kinetochore factors have been identified only in budding and fission yeasts, these molecules and their functions are thought to have diverged earlier. Therefore, a conserved mechanism for meiotic kinetochore regulation remains elusive. Here we have identified in mouse a meiosis-specific kinetochore factor that we termed MEIKIN, which functions in meiosis I but not in meiosis II or mitosis. MEIKIN plays a crucial role in both mono-orientation and centromeric cohesion protection, partly by stabilizing the localization of the cohesin protector shugoshin. These functions are mediated mainly by the activity of Polo-like kinase PLK1, which is enriched to kinetochores in a MEIKIN-dependent manner. Our integrative analysis indicates that the long-awaited key regulator of meiotic kinetochore function is Meikin, which is conserved from yeasts to humans.

Abstract 545: Frameshift mutations of chromosome cohesion-related genes SGOL1 and PDS5B in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability

Abstract Cohesin is a protein complex that regulates chromatid cohesion and plays a role in preventing aneuploidy and maintaining chromosomal stability. SGOL1 encodes a cohesin protector, and PDS5B encodes a regulatory cohesion factor. Both SGOL1 and PDS5B are considered putative tumor suppressor genes. The aim of this study was to explore whether SGOL1 and PDS5B genes are mutated and expressionally altered in gastric and colorectal cancers. A genome database indicated that both genes possessed mononucleotide repeats in coding sequences, which could be mutation targets in cancers with microsatellite instability. We analyzed mutations in 91 gastric cancers and 100 colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability or stable/low microsatellite instability by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing. We also analyzed SGOL1 and PDS5B expression by immunohistochemistry. Overall, we found 21 SGOL1 frameshift mutations in 21 cases and 18 PDS5B frameshift mutations in 16 cases. SGOL1 and PDS5B frameshift mutations were detected in 26.6% and 20.3%, respectively, of high microsatellite instability but not in stable/low microsatellite instability (0/112). By immunohistochemistry, losses of SGOL1 and PDS5B were identified in 19% to 47% of the gastric and colorectal cancers irrespective of microsatellite instability status. The losses were more common in those with frameshift mutations or high microsatellite instability than those without mutations or high microsatellite instability. The data indicate that frameshift mutations of SGOL1 and PDS5B and the loss of their expression may be a feature of gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability. In addition, the data suggest that these alterations might contribute to cancer pathogenesis by deregulating cohesin-related functions. Citation Format: Min Sung Kim, Youn Jin Choi, Min Gwak, Hyerim Oh, Mi Ryoung Choi, Sun Yong Hwang, Nam Jin Yoo, Sug Hyung Lee. Frameshift mutations of chromosome cohesion-related genes SGOL1 and PDS5B in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 545. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-545

Abstract C123: Frameshift mutations of chromosome cohesion-related genes SGOL1 and PDS5B in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability.

Abstract Background: Cohesin is a protein complex that regulates chromatid cohesion and plays roles in preventing aneuploidy and maintaining chromosomal stability. SGOL1 encodes a cohesin protector and PDS5B encodes a regulatory cohesion factor. Both SGOL1 and PDS5B are considered putative tumor suppressor genes. Purpose: Aim of this study was to explore whether SGOL1 and PDS5B genes are mutated and expressionally altered in gastric (GC) and colorectal cancers (CRC). Method: In a database, we found that both genes possessed mononucleotide repeats in coding sequences that could be mutation targets in cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI). We analyzed mutations in them in 91 GC and 100 CRC with high MSI (MSI-H) or stable MSI/low MSI (MSS/MSI-L) by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing. We also analyzed SGOL1 and PDS5B expressions in the GC and CRC by immunohistochemistry. Results: Overall, we found 21 SGOL1 frameshift mutations in 21 cancers and 18 PDS5B frameshift mutations in 16 cancers. SGOL1 and PDS5B frameshift mutation were detected in 26.6% and 20.3% of MSI-H respectively, but not in MSS/MSI-L (0/112). In immunohistochemistry, losses of SGOL1 and PDS5B were identified in 19 - 47% of the GC and CRC irrespective of MSI status. The losses were more common in those with the frameshift mutations or MSI-H than those without the mutations or MSI-H. Conclusion: The data indicate that frameshift mutations of SGOL1 and PDS5B, and their losses may be a feature of GC and CRC with MSI-H. Also, the data suggest that these alterations might contribute to cancer pathogenesis by deregulating cohesin-related functions. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):C123. Citation Format: Changhyeok An, Min Sung Kim, Jae Im Lee, Nam Jin Yoo, Sug Hyung Lee. Frameshift mutations of chromosome cohesion-related genes SGOL1 and PDS5B in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2013;12(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C123.

Chromosome Segregation: Learning to Let Go

To ensure accurate chromosome segregation, cohesion between sister chromatids must be released in a controlled manner during mitosis. A new study reveals how distinct centromere populations of the cohesin protector Sgo1 are regulated by microtubule attachments, cyclin-dependent kinases, and the kinetochore kinase Bub1.

NIPBL, a Cohesion Loading Factor, Is Somatically Mutated in Gastric and Colorectal Cancers with High Microsatellite Instability

Timely segregation of sister chromatids during the cell cycle is essential for maintaining euploidy [1]. Aberrant segregation into daughter cells promotes aneuploidy and chromosome instability, which are features of many tumors [1]. Chromatid cohesion, a physical linkage of replicated sister chromatids, is mediated by a multiprotein complex called cohesin [1]. NIPBL is a cohesion loading factor that is required for cohesin to interact with chromosomes [2, 3]. NIPBL mutations (missense, nonsense, frameshift and deletion mutations) account for approximately 60 % of Cornelia de Lange syndrome, a congenital disorder with multisystem developmental abnormalities [3]. In Cornelia de Lange syndrome, mutated NIPBL interferes with its interaction with its partners in the cohesion complex [3]. Components in the cohesin complex and cohesin regulatory proteins are frequently altered at expression and mutation levels in human cancers [1]. For example, cohesin protector SGOL1 down-regulation leads to chromosomal instability in colorectal cancers (CRC) [4]. Somatic mutations of cohesion regulatory factor PDS5B have been identified in prostate cancers [5]. These data suggest that cohesin-related genes could be considered potential tumor suppressor genes (TSG) [1]. Somatic mutations of the NIPBL gene have been found in CRC with stable miscrosatellite instability (MSI) that may underlie chromosomal instability in CRC [6]. Together, these data suggest a possibility that NIPBL is a candidate TSG. In a public genome database (http://genome.cse.ucsc. edu/), we found that the human NIPBL gene had mononucleotide repeats in its coding sequences that could be targets for frameshift mutation in cancers with high MSI (MSI-H) [7]. To data, however, the data on NIPBL somatic mutation in gastric (GC) and CRC with MSI-H are lacking. To see whether the mononucleotide repeats in the NIPBL gene are mutated in GC and CRC, we analyzed two A7 and one A8 repeats in NIPBL exon 10 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) assay with three primer pairs. For this, we used 32 GC with MSI-H, 59 GC with MSS, 47 CRC with MSI-H and 53 CRC with MSS in methacarnfixed tissues. All of the patients of the cancers were Koreans. In cancer tissues, malignant cells and normal cells were selectively procured from hematoxylin and eosinstained slides by microdissection [8]. Radioisotope ([P]dCTP) was incorporated into the PCR products for detection by autoradiogram. The PCR products were subsequently displayed in SSCP gels. After SSCP, direct DNA sequencing reactions were performed in the cancers with mobility shifts in the SSCP. On the SSCP, we observed aberrant bands of the NIPBL gene in 11 cancers (Fig. 1). DNA from normal tissue Min Sung Kim and Chang Hyeok An contributed equally to this study.

Aurora B and Cdk1 mediate Wapl activation and release of acetylated cohesin from chromosomes by phosphorylating Sororin

Sister chromatid cohesion depends on Sororin, a protein that stabilizes acetylated cohesin complexes on DNA by antagonizing the cohesin release factor Wings-apart like protein (Wapl). Cohesion is essential for chromosome biorientation but has to be dissolved to enable sister chromatid separation. To achieve this, the majority of cohesin is removed from chromosome arms in prophase and prometaphase in a manner that depends on Wapl and phosphorylation of cohesin's subunit stromal antigen 2 (SA2), whereas centromeric cohesin is cleaved in metaphase by the protease separase. Here we show that the mitotic kinases Aurora B and Cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) destabilize interactions between Sororin and the cohesin subunit precocious dissociation of sisters protein 5 (Pds5) by phosphorylating Sororin, leading to release of acetylated cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of cohesion. At centromeres, the cohesin protector shugoshin (Sgo1)-protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) antagonizes Aurora B and Cdk1 partly by dephosphorylating Sororin and thus maintains cohesion until metaphase. We propose that the stepwise loss of cohesion between chromosome arms and centromeres is caused by local regulation of Wapl activity, which is controlled by the phosphorylation state of Sororin.

Frameshift mutations of chromosome cohesion–related genes SGOL1 and PDS5B in gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability

Cohesin is a protein complex that regulates chromatid cohesion and plays a role in preventing aneuploidy and maintaining chromosomal stability. SGOL1 encodes a cohesin protector, and PDS5B encodes a regulatory cohesion factor. Both SGOL1 and PDS5B are considered putative tumor suppressor genes. The aim of this study was to explore whether SGOL1 and PDS5B genes are mutated and expressionally altered in gastric and colorectal cancers. A genome database indicated that both genes possessed mononucleotide repeats in coding sequences, which could be mutation targets in cancers with microsatellite instability. We analyzed mutations in 91 gastric cancers and 100 colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability or stable/low microsatellite instability by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing. We also analyzed SGOL1 and PDS5B expression by immunohistochemistry. Overall, we found 21 SGOL1 frameshift mutations in 21 cases and 18 PDS5B frameshift mutations in 16 cases. SGOL1 and PDS5B frameshift mutations were detected in 26.6% and 20.3%, respectively, of high microsatellite instability but not in stable/low microsatellite instability (0/112). By immunohistochemistry, losses of SGOL1 and PDS5B were identified in 19% to 47% of the gastric and colorectal cancers irrespective of microsatellite instability status. The losses were more common in those with frameshift mutations or high microsatellite instability than those without mutations or high microsatellite instability. The data indicate that frameshift mutations of SGOL1 and PDS5B and the loss of their expression may be a feature of gastric and colorectal cancers with high microsatellite instability. In addition, the data suggest that these alterations might contribute to cancer pathogenesis by deregulating cohesin-related functions.