Prospective Real-world Study Research Articles

848P Second-line systemic treatment for patients with advanced melanoma: Results from the prospective real-world study GEM1801

Information regarding charatcteristics and outcomes of second line treatment for patients with advanced melanoma is scarce since no randomized clinical trials are published in the post-targeted and immunotherapy era. Real-world data studies are capital for benchmarking patients´ outcomes in order to design clinical trials in this scenario. GEM1801 is a prospective observational real-world study that currently has included 551 patients with advanced melanoma treated in 37 centers from the Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM). This is a descriptive analysis of basal characteristics, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from patients that received second line treatment in GEM1801. 186 (33.8%) patients received a second line (2L) treatment. For the 186 patients receiving 2L, with a median follow up of 6.4 months (m) (95% CI: 4.9-9.8), median PFS was 4.7 m (95% CI: 3.5-5.8) and median OS 11.3 m (95% CI: 8.6-13.4) from the beginning of 2L. Additionally, 63 (33.9%) patients received treatment beyond 2L. Table summarizes the patients characteristics and their outcomes according to BRAF status and treatments. For the 365 (66.2%) patients that did not receive 2L, the reasons were: 249 (68.2%) no progression with first line; 110 (30.1%) death before 2L; 6 (1.6%) loss of follow up.Table: 848PCHARACTERISTIC AT 2LBRAF Mutated N= 99BRAF wildtype N= 82SEX female N (%)47 (47.5)33 (40.2)age (median, Rank)59 (23-90)69 (29-93)ECOG 0-1 N (%)87 (87.9)78 (95.1)LDH >UNL N (%)34 (34.3)26 (31.7)M1C-D N (%)62 (62.6)40 (48.8)2L targeted therapy (TT): N, (%)44 (44.4)2 (2.4)TT mPFS, m (95% CI)12.4 (6.1-NR)2 (NA-NA)TT mOS, m (95% CI)20 (11.5-NR)2.7 (NA-NA)2L immunotherapy (IT): N (%)46 (46.5)34 (41.5)IT mPFS, m (95% CI)5.3 (2.9-10.8)3.1 (2.3-8.2)IT mOS, m (95% CI)10.9 (3.7-NR)12.5 (8.1-NR)2L Chemotherapy (CT): N, (%)4 (4)29 (35.4)CT mPFS, m (95% CI)0.4 (0-NR)3.2 (2.7-5.5)CT mOS, m (95% CI)0.6 (0.2-NR)5.6 (3.9-15.2)2L non specified: N (%)5 (5.1)13 (15.9)Treatment beyond 2L N (%)27 (27.8)33 (39.3)There are 5 patients with unknown BRAF status. Open table in a new tab There are 5 patients with unknown BRAF status. Second line treatment is still a difficult clinical scenario, especially for patients with BRAF wildtype melanoma and with BRAF mutated that progress after targeted therapy. The results, remarkably for PFS, need to be improved, thereby clinical trials participation is encouraged.

EP10.01-010 Real-world Study of the Incidence and Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Chinese Lung Cancer (RIVAL)

Patients with lung cancer have high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), which might aggravate the overall survival. This prospective real-world study aims to investigate the incidence of VTE and determine the VTE-high-risk population of lung cancer.

401P PROMETCO study: Metastatic colorectal cancer treatment patterns of the first 531 enrolled patients

Tumour shrinkage and disease control with preservation or improvement in quality of life are the primary treatment goals for patients (pts) with unresectable mCRC.1 When not possible, emphasis lies in avoidance of rapid disease evolution, and prolonging survival.1 Advances in mCRC treatment have now improved survival to an average of 30 months in clinical trials.1 Here we present treatment patterns from 531 pts from the PROMETCO study (NCT03935763), the first international, prospective real-world study to investigate the continuum of care in the mCRC population, collecting data on all pts regardless of treatment or age.

863P Elderly patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Results from the prospective real-world study GEM1801

Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is suffering an increase in incidence and mortality in recent decades, especially in elderly pts, who experience different biological behavior. Management of CM in elderly pts is conditioned by limited expectations of survival, quality of life and a high incidence of comorbidities. These abstract reviews the treatment elections and the outcomes of elderly pts in the real world setting in Spain, specifically in a prospective manner.

Value of rest 18F-FDG myocardial imaging in the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease in Chinese patients with suspected unstable angina: A prospective real-world clinical study

BackgroundThis study aimed to determine the clinical value of rest 18F-FDG imaging in Chinese patients with non-acute chest pain, normal ECG, negative troponin, and suspected UA. Methods136 patients were prospectively included and underwent rest 18F-FDG PET imaging and coronary arteriography within 1 week. ResultsObstructive CAD was diagnosed in 71 patients, and stenosis ≥ 70% was confirmed in 130 vascular territories. At patients and vascular level, rest 18F-FDG imaging showed sensitivity of 62.0%, 47.7%, specificity of 92.3%, 94.2%, accuracy of 76.5%, 79.4%, PPV of 89.8% and 79.5%, and NPV of 69.0% and 79.4%. The AUCs were 0.771 and 0.710. Of 71 patients with obstructive CAD, rest 18F-FDG imaging showed sensitivity of 47.7% and 58.8%, specificity of 91.6% and 91.2%, accuracy of 64.8% and 80.4%, PPV of 89.9% and 76.9% and NPV of 52.8% and 81.6% in all vascular level and single-vessel disease. In patients with two- or three-vessel disease, rest 18F-FDG imaging had a diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 43.8%, 93.3%, 50.5%, 97.7%, and 20.6%. The AUCs were 0.696, 0.750, and 0.685. ConclusionRest 18F-FDG imaging performed certain overall diagnostic efficiency for obstructive CAD in Chinese patients with suspected UA, especially the excellent high PPV in identifying culprit ischemic territory in patients with multivessel disease.

Effectiveness of Golimumab as Second Anti-TNFα Drug in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis and Axial Spondyloarthritis in Italy: GO-BEYOND, a Prospective Real-World Observational Study.

In this prospective observational study, data were collected from 34 rheumatology clinics in Italy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who started golimumab (GLM) as a second anti-TNFα drug. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of GLM after 6 months. Changes in quality of life using the EQ-5D-5L were also assessed. A total of 194 patients aged 53.2 ± 12 years started GLM as a second anti-TNF drug: 39 (20.1%) with RA, 91 (46.9%) with PsA and 64 (32.9%) with axSpA. After 6 months of GLM treatment, 68% of RA patients achieved low disease activity (LDA; DAS28-CRP ≤ 3.2), 31.9% of PsA patients achieved minimal disease activity and 32.5% of axSpA patients achieved LDA (ASDAS-CRP < 2.1). Good/moderate EULAR response was achieved in 61.9% and 73.8% of patients with RA and PsA, respectively, and 16% of axSpA patients achieved a 50% improvement in BASDAI. Across all indications, improvements in disease activity measures and EQ-5D-5L domains were observed over 6 months. The main reasons for GLM interruption were lack/loss of efficacy (7.2%) or adverse events (2%). This study confirms the effectiveness of GLM as a second-line anti-TNF for the treatment of RA, PsA and axSpA in a real-world setting in Italy.

Tofacitinib Response in Ulcerative Colitis (TOUR): Early Response After Initiation of Tofacitinib Therapy in a Real-world Setting.

Tofacitinib is an oral, small-molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). Using a novel electronic reporting tool, we aimed to prospectively describe the onset of tofacitinib efficacy during induction therapy in a real-world study. Patient-reported outcome data (PROs) including the simple clinical colitis activity index (SCCAI), PRO Measurement Identification Systems (PROMIS) measures, and adverse events were collected daily for the first 14 days and at day 28 and 56. Paired t tests and P for trend were utilized to compare changes in SCCAI over time. Bivariate analyses and logistic regression models were performed to describe response (SCCAI <5) and remission (SCCAI ≤2) by clinical factors. Of all included patients (n = 96), 67% had failed ≥2 biologics, and 61.5% were on concomitant steroids. Starting at day 3, PROs showed significant and persistent decline of the mean SCCAI (-1.1, P < 000.1) including significantly lower SCCAI subscores for stool frequency (-0.3; P < .003), bleeding (-0.3; P < .0002) and urgency (-0.2; P < .001). Steroid-free remission at day 14, 28, and 56 was achieved in 25%, 30.2%, and 29.2% of patients, respectively. Neither prior biologics nor endoscopic severity were independently predictive of response or remission in multivariate models. Numeric improvements in all PROMIS measures (anxiety, depression, social satisfaction) were seen through day 56. Rates of discontinuation due to adverse events were low. In this prospective real-world study, tofacitinib resulted in a rapid and persistent improvement in UC disease activity PROs. The safety findings were consistent with the established safety profile of tofacitinib.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of Qilong Capsules in treatment of ischemic stroke based on prospective real-world cohort study

In this study, TreeAge Pro was used to build a decision tree model for Qilong Capsules in the treatment of ischemic stroke. We compared the economy between Qilong Capsules + conventional therapy vs conventional therapy in the treatment of ischemic stroke to guide the rational allocation of health resources in clinical practice. The cost parameters in the study were obtained from Menet and the relevant literature published recently. Meanwhile, the efficacy parameter [mean reduction in National Institute of Health stroke scale(NIHSS) score after treatment] was employed to evaluate the short-term economic performance of the two therapies based on a prospective real-world cohort study. The time span of simulation was 24 weeks, and the robustness of this study was verified by sensitivity analysis. Qilong Capsules + conventional therapy and conventional therapy had the direct medical costs of CNY 22 546.50, 21 160.50 and the effectiveness of 2.08, 1.59 points, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER) of the two groups was CNY 2 811.36. That is, compared with conventional therapy, Qilong Capsules + conventional therapy in the treatment of ischemic stroke costed CNY 2 811.36 for each additional point reduction in NIHSS score. If the patient is willing to pay more than CNY 2 811.36, Qilong Capsules + conventional therapy is more economical. The result of sensitivity analysis verified that the ICER was robust. Thus, on the basis of the assumption that per capita disposable income in 2020 is the threshold of patients' willingness to pay, Qilong Capsules + conventional therapy is more economical than conventional therapy alone in the treatment of ischemic stroke.

A prospective real-world study to assess the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab biosimilar in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: Preliminary safety results.

e12524 Background: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) defines a biosimilar as a biological molecule product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from an existing approved reference product. The trastuzumab biosimilar was the first oncology biosimilar approved in Brazil for HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) and advanced gastric cancer treatment. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of trastuzumab biosimilar (named as Zedora in Brazil) in the adjuvant setting among HER2-positive BC patients treated in Brazil. Methods: This is a national, multicentric, observational, and prospective real-world study. Patients with early-stage HER2-positive BC who received at least one dose of trastuzumab biosimilar as adjuvant therapy were eligible. At the present date, 126 of 170 planned patients were recruited. Here, we present the preliminary safety data of the first 42 patients recruited in the study. The safety endpoint is the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), and the safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of trastuzumab biosimilar. We analyzed the AEs collected from the signature of the consent form until the end of adjuvant treatment. Results: Baseline patient characteristics among the 42 evaluated patients included a median age of 48.5 years, with 78.6% of them having a node-negative disease. Most patients had hormone-receptor-positive tumors (71.4% estrogen-receptor-positive and 57.1% progesterone-receptor-positive). The number of patients undergoing conservative surgery (59.5%) was higher than mastectomy (40.5%). The most frequent histological BC subtype was invasive ductal carcinoma (97.6%). Neoadjuvant therapy included the trastuzumab biosimilar administration (25%) and the dual anti-HER2 block (trastuzumab biosimilar + pertuzumab) (68.8%). Only 6.3% of patients received the reference trastuzumab in neoadjuvant therapy. In total, 25/42 (59,5%) patients had at least one AE, two of them were serious AEs (4.8%). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 AEs was 35.7%, and no death occurred. The table lists the most reported AEs according to SOC (System Organ Class). Conclusions: The nature and severity of AEs observed were consistent with the known safety profile of trastuzumab. Clinical trial information: NCT03892655. [Table: see text]

Effectiveness and safety of eribulin as a front-line treatment in advanced breast cancer patients in China: A prospective real-world study.

e13015 Background: Eribulin is a non-taxane microtubule inhibitor, which was approved for the third-line treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) in China in 2019. However, the efficacy and safety data of eribulin for the ABC in Chinese patients is lacking, whether as first, second, or third-line regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety, and treatment pattern of eribulin in first to third-line settings in Chinese ABC patients. Methods: Patients with histologically confirmed advanced breast cancer, who previously received ≤2 lines of treatment for metastatic disease were enrolled. In HR+/HER2- ABC, eribulin monotherapy was used; in HER2+ ABC, eribulin plus anti-HER2 targeted therapy were used; in metastasis triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), eribulin plus immunotherapy/chemotherapy were used. Primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included disease control rate (DCR) and safety. This study was approved by the SYSMH and SYSUCC Ethics Committee (approval No. 2020-KY-064). Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled from 2021.1.1 to 2021.10.20, including 41 metastatic and 6 de novo ABC patients. Eribulin was used as first-line therapy in 12 (25.5%) patients, second-line therapy in 24 patients (51.1%), and third-line therapy in 11 (23.1%) patients. More than 90% of the patients did not receive gemcitabine or vinorelbine, and 30.0% of them did not receive anthracycline or taxane previously. DCR was 70.2%, as 24 cases (51.1%) had stable disease and 9 cases (19.1%) had complete or partial remission. In subgroup analysis, median PFSs of 9.6 (95% CI: 6.5-12.7), 7.1 (95%CI: 4.4-9.8), and 5.6 (95%CI: 3.8-7.5) months were observed in patients receiving eribulin as first-, second-, and third-line therapy, respectively. In addition, median PFSs were 7.1 (95% CI: 5.1-9.3), 9.6 (95%CI: 3.6-15.7), 4.6 (95%CI: 4.6-4.6) and 5.8 (95%CI: 4.4-7.3) months for HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+, and mTNBC patients, respectively. Other results from the subgroups analysis were shown in table. Common treatment-related toxicity was hematological toxicities including leukopenia (23%), neutropenia (17%), and thrombocytopenia (10%). There was no ≥grade 3 adverse events and no adverse event-related treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Eribulin monotherapy or combined with targeted therapy was effective and well-tolerated as the first to third lines of treatment in ABC. This promising therapeutic outcome might warrant further studies in early eribulin administration in ABC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04683445. [Table: see text]

Efficacy of anlotinib for advanced SCLC patients: A real-world study.

e20621 Background: Anlotinib is a novel small molecule multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, which has been approved as a third-line therapy for patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) by NMPA in Aug 2019. ALTER 1202 trial has demonstrated that anlotinib significantly prolonged progress-free survival (PFS) and improved disease control rate (DCR) of advanced SCLC patients. Since the efficacy of patients in real clinical practice is affected by many factors, the objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of anlotinib for patients with advanced SCLC in real world. Methods: This is a multi-center, non-interventional, prospective real-world study and all registered data are collected from real clinical practice cases. Patients diagnosed as advanced SCLC and treated with anlotinib were included. The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), DCR and safety. Results: Until Dec 2021, a total of 44 eligible patients were included, with a median age of 62 years, including 34 males (77.3%) and 10 females (22.7%). Among them, 38 patients (86.4%) were diagnosed as a limited stage SCLC and 6 patients (13.6%) diagnosed extensive stage. All patients have not received other targeted therapies before. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95%CI 2.4-5.8), and the median OS was 15.9 months (95%CI 9.1-18.83). At the data cut-off date, 1 patient was assessed as CR, 22 patients were assessed as PR, 15 patients were assessed as SD and 4 patients were assessed as PD. The ORR was 52.3% and the DCR was 86.4%. Conclusions: Significant improvement in OS and PFS were found for advanced SCLC patients in this real-world study. This exhibited that anlotinib has a potential efficacy over previous treatment models. Of course, safety must be further observed subsequently.

A real-world study update: Efficacy and safety of anlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

e21106 Background: Anlotinib is an oral novel receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) inhibitor targeting multiple RTKs including VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and c-kit. Due to its high efficacy and low side effects in ALTER 0303 trial, Anlotinib has been approved as a 3rd line therapy for pts with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by NMPA in May 2018. The interim results of our real-world study suggested anlotinib substantially prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) with manageable toxicity in later lines treatment of advanced NSCLC patients. Here, we update our latest results on the treatment experience in a broad NSCLC population. Methods: This is a multi-center, non-interventional, prospective real-world study. All registered data are collected from real-life clinical practice setting. Patients with advanced NSCLC treating with anlotinib were included. The primary endpoint was PFS, and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: As of January 2022, a total of 371 pts were enrolled, of whom 347 were evaluable, with a median age of 63 years, 232 males (66.9%). There were 40 pts (11.5%) with brain metastasis, 52 pts (15.0%) with bone metastasis, and 29 pts (8.4%) with liver metastasis at baseline. 109 pts (31.4%) received anlotinib as first/second line treatment, whereas 238 pts (68.6%) as third/later line treatment. In the overall population, DCR and ORR were 84.7% and 18.7% respectively. The mPFS was 6.3 months (95%CI, 5.7, 6.9) and the mOS was 12.2 months (95%CI, 9.5,14.9). Subgroup analysis showed more details. A trend towards better ORR (33.3%) was observed in the first line setting while a significantly better DCR (89.5%) was observed in the second line setting. The mPFS of first-/second-line treatment (6.9 months) was longer than that of the third-line or above treatment (5.8 months). The mOS of the first-/second- and third-line or above treatment were 10.4 (7.8,13) and 13.5 (8.9,18.1) months respectively. 52 pts (15%) had any grade of adverse events, of which 10 pts (2.9%) had grade 3 or above AEs. The most common AEs were hypoalbuminemia (3.5%), alanine aminotransferase reduction (1.4%), proteinuria (1.2%) and hyponatremia (1.2%). Conclusions: The updated results showed that anlotinib prolonged not only PFS but also OS significantly with a favorable safety profile, especially for OS benefits in third-line or later treatment. These data also indirectly revealed that anlotinib is a promising treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC despite of treatment line in the real world.

Preliminary results of raltitrexed in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A prospective, multicenter, real-world study.

3591 Background: Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen is one of the common regimens for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective observational real-world study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of raltitrexed administered to Chinese patients with mCRC in real life setting. Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, real-world study. Prospectively registered Patients received second-line treatment of raltitrexed plus irinotecan combined with or without target therapy until progression disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) and safety. Totally,1000 patients were required for primary point testing. Results: Between May 2018 and December 2021,a total of 1039 patients from 57 centers were screened for enrollment,among which 271 patients were treated with raltitrexed plus irinotecan, 753 patients accepted target therapy (bevacizumab or cetuximab) additionally, and 15 patients combined with other drugs. Overall mPFS was 6.8 months (95%CI: 6.5-7.1),ORR was 20.2%, and DCR was 85.7%; The ORR of combined with or without target therapy were 21.6% and 16.2% ( p = 0.038),respectively, the DCR were 88.2% and 79.0% ( p &lt; 0.001). The mPFS of combined without or with target therapy were 5.2 months (95% CI: 4.7 to 5.7) and 7.3 months respectively (95% CI: 7.0-7.7) [HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.56̃0.80, p &lt; 0.001], The mPFS of combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab were 7.4 months (95% CI: 7.0 -7.8) and 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.9-7.7) [HR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.88̃1.51, p = 0.3]. mOS has not yet reached. Majority of treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs) were grade I or II. The most common grade III or IV TRAEs reported by 116 patients (11.2%) were aspartate aminotransferase increased (4.0%), alanine aminotransferase increased (3.7%), neutrocytopenia (2.7%), glutamyltransferase increased (2.5%), leukocytopenia (1.1%). Conclusions: The real-world study confirmd that raltitrexed was an effective and safe regimen for the second-line treatment in Chinese patients with mCRC, especially combined with target therapy additionally, which was aligned with previous trials. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1800016185.

Efficacy of afatinib in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors harboring NRG1 gene fusions: A novel, prospective real-world outcomes study based on single-patient protocol data.

TPS3180 Background: Oncogenic neuregulin 1 ( NRG1) gene fusions occur in ̃0.2% of solid tumors overall and in up to 31% of cases of invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma [Laskin et al. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(12):1693–1703; Cadranel et al. Oncologist. 2021;26(1):7–16]. NRG1 fusion proteins provide an extracellular anchor for the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain of NRG1 to bind to ErbB3 (HER3), leading to HER3 heterodimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways, resulting in oncogenesis. Afatinib, an irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor, represents a potential treatment for NRG1-fusion positive ( NRG1+) tumors. This study aims to examine the safety and efficacy of afatinib in patients with NRG1+ solid tumors, for which no authorized targeted therapy exists. Methods: This prospective, decentralized, US study (NCT05107193) will include 40 evaluable patients aged ≥18 years. Participating molecular test providers across the USA will identify eligible fusions in the course of routine diagnostic assays. When a patient with an NRG1 fusion is identified, participating test providers will notify the treating physician of the study as a treatment option for the patient. Patients’ primary oncologists will then contact the trial sponsor to confirm patient eligibility. Once approved by the central Institutional Review Board, patients will receive afatinib on a single-patient protocol basis, until disease progression or treatment is no longer tolerated. The recommended dosage per SmPC is 40 mg orally QD. Patients will be screened and enrolled into the study at their existing point-of-care setting. Inclusion criteria include a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of an advanced, unresectable/metastatic, non-hematologic malignancy with an NRG1 fusion, evaluable per RECIST 1.1. Any coding gene as the NRG1 fusion partner is permitted. Fusion status will be confirmed prospectively by a contracted molecular test provider. Exclusion criteria include prior systemic anti-cancer therapy or investigational drug within 14 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is shorter) of the start of afatinib treatment; an actionable driver mutation other than NRG1 fusion for which FDA-approved targeted therapy is available; and prior treatment with an ErbB-targeted therapy. The primary endpoint of the study is confirmed objective response (OR) by independent central review per RECIST 1.1, defined as best overall response of either complete response or partial response and analysed as the proportion of patients with an OR. The key secondary endpoint is duration of response, defined as the time from the first documented OR to progression or death. Secondary endpoints include time to OR and disease control per investigator assessment. Safety will also be assessed. The study is open for recruitment. Clinical trial information: NCT05107193.

Prognostic Accuracy of DSM-5 Attenuated Psychotic Symptoms in Adolescents: Prospective Real-World 5-year Cohort Study

IntroductionThere is limited research in adolescent at risk for psychosis. The new criteria of Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome (APS) of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders- 5 (DSM-5) have not been validated.ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to: 1) characterize adolescent’s profile with APS (DSM-5 APS) compared to adolescents with early onset psychosis (EOP) and with other psychiatric disorders (non-APS); 2) to estimate their long-term risk of transition to psychosis and prognostic accuracy of DSM-5 APS.Methods243 adolescents, aged 12-17, were included (October 2012- July 2019) and dived in three sub-groups (110 DSM-5 APS, 31 EOP, 102 non-APS). All underwent a comprehensive assessment evaluating: sociodemographic characteristics, family and personal history of any DSM-5 psychiatric disorders, psychopathological assessment and level of functioning. An annual follow-up evaluation was carried out (up to 7 years) including a clinical interview to investigate DSM-5 criteria for transition to psychosis.ResultsDSM-5 APS adolescents had on average higher comorbid disorders (2.3) and intermediate psychopathological and functioning profile between non-APS/EOP. The cumulative risk of transition at 1,2,3, 4-5 years was 13%, 17%, 24.2%, 26.8% and 26.8% in DSM-5 APS group, 0%, 0%, 3.2%, 3.2% and 3.2% in the non-APS. The 5-year prognostic accuracy of the DSM-5 APS in adolescent was adequate (Area Under the Curve=0.77) with high sensitivity (91.3%) and suboptimal specificity (63.2%).ConclusionsThe DSM-5 APS diagnosis can be used to detect help-seeking adolescents at risk of psychosis and predict their long-term outcomes, leading the way to new preventive approaches.DisclosureThe authors declare that they do not have a significant financial interest, consultancy or other relationship with products, manufacturer(s) of products or providers of services related to this abstrac.

738-P: The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES) : Final 24-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes

Data on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in people living with T2D who initiate injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) medication in routine clinical practice are limited. Here we present final PRO data from the TROPHIES 24-month, prospective, non-comparative, observational study of adult patients with T2D in France, Germany and Italy who started their first injectable GLP-1 RA with either once-weekly dulaglutide (DU) or once-daily liraglutide (LIRA) . Patients’ scores on PRO questionnaires were assessed every 6 months. We present scores at 24 months compared with baseline values before starting DU or LIRA treatment. For each PRO measure, higher scores reflect better outcomes. Baseline characteristics (previously published) for patients prescribed DU (N=1,014) or LIRA (N=991) were similar between groups. Mean changes from baseline to 24 months in PRO scores indicate improvements in health outcomes in patients initiating DU or LIRA (Table) . In summary, among those patients still evaluable at 24 months we observed improvements in PRO scores from baseline in both groups, but with a more pronounced trend of improvement in the DU cohort for EQ-5D-5L VAS, IW-SP, DTSQs total, and DPM life and work productivity scores. Disclosure M.Fuechtenbusch: Advisory Panel; Berlin-Chemie AG, Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp., Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk. K.Boye: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. B.Guerci: Advisory Panel; Amgen Inc., Medtronic, Board Member; Abbott Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk. F.Giorgino: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk, Consultant; Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi, Research Support; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. L.Garcia-perez: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. E.Heitmann: None. J.Lebrec: Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company. A.Barrett: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. A.Dib: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company, Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. M.Orsini federici: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company.

726-P: The Real-World Observational Prospective Study of Health Outcomes with Dulaglutide and Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (TROPHIES) : Final 24-Month Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Pattern Analyses

TROPHIES was a 24-month, prospective, non-comparative, observational study in adult patients with T2D initiating their first injectable glucose-lowering treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide (DU; N=1,014) or once-daily liraglutide (LIRA; N=991) in France, Germany, and Italy. Secondary objectives included assessments of HbA1c, body weight and treatment patterns. Clinical characteristics of the DU and LIRA cohorts at 24 months are described in the Table. Most patients receiving DU (856/1,014) initiated treatment at 1.5 mg/week and, among 286 patients with a significant treatment change, 237 were still receiving 1.5 mg/week. In the LIRA cohort, most patients (809/991) initiated at the starting dose 0.6 mg/day and 45% increased dose to 1.2 mg/day by Day 90; however, 17% of patients were already receiving 1.8 mg/day by Day 90. At the first significant treatment change 285/448 patients in the LIRA cohort were receiving 1.2 mg/day. Insulin was initiated by 79 and 97 patients in the DU and LIRA cohorts, respectively. Both treatments showed clinically meaningful effectiveness on HbA1c and weight, maintained over the 24-month study period. Disclosure B. Guerci: Advisory Panel; Amgen Inc., Medtronic. Board Member; Abbott Diagnostics, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk. F. Giorgino: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk. Consultant; Lilly Diabetes, Sanofi. Research Support; Lilly Diabetes, Roche Diabetes Care, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. K. Boye: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Fuechtenbusch: Advisory Panel; Berlin-Chemie AG. Consultant; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp. Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk. E. Heitmann: None. J. Lebrec: Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company. A. Dib: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Orsini Federici: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. M. Yu: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company. L. Garcia-Perez: Employee; Eli Lilly and Company. Stock/Shareholder; Eli Lilly and Company.

Circulating cytokines as predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients (pts) with melanoma (Mel) and non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2549 Background: ICIs lead to durable response and a significant survival improvement in a limited number of advanced stage Mel and NSCLC pts. The identification of predictive circulating biomarkers could be a promising tool to optimize pts’ selection and outcome for ICIs treatment. Methods: This is a prospective real-world study enrolling advanced stage Mel and NSCLC pts referred to four Italian Centers and treated with ICIs. The primary endpoint is to verify the presence of an association between circulating cytokines (IL-1b, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFα, GM-CSF) and disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Pts undergo a blood collection, before every cycle for 6 cycles (T1-T6) and at tumor assessment till disease progression (PD) or for 2 years. Biomarker levels were assessed by Luminex xMAP based technology using R&amp;D High Sensitivity kits. Each marker was categorized according to high and low levels by maximizing its discriminative ability, and the association with the outcome was tested in univariate and multiple analyses. Results: We report preliminary results on the T1-T2 blood samples from the first 78 enrolled pts (32 females/46 males; 43 Mel/35 NSCLC; median age 69 years). Serum IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 were significantly higher at T1 and T2 in pts with PD (Kruskal-Wallis test). The median relative increase (RI) of IL-8 was 32% and 2% in pts with PD and disease control (DC), respectively (p = 0.0001). At multiple logistic analysis, IL-6 and IL-8 at T2 and the RI of IL-8 were independent factors predicting the probability of DC, with an overall accuracy of 83.8%. High levels of IL-6 and IL-8 at T2 were significantly associated with a low probability of DC (OR = 0.13, 95%CI: 0.03-0.52 and OR = 0.09, 95%CI: 0.02-0.37, respectively), and the RI showed a significantly lower probability of DC (OR = 0.14, 95%CI: 0.02-0.58). With a median follow-up of 10.6 months (m), mPFS and mOS were 5.8 m, 95%CI: 2.3-7.4 and 8.3 m, 95%CI: 4.0-13.8 for NSCLC; 6.9 m, 95%CI: 2.8-15.9 and 12.6 m, 95%CI: 4.7-NE for Mel pts, respectively. In the multiple Cox model, elevated IL-6 and IL-8 at T1 (HR = 3.03, 95%CI: 1.55-6.37, HR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.46-5.63), elevated IL-10 at T2 (HR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.39-5.94), and a RI of IL-8 (HR = 4.22, 95%CI: 1.85-11.21) remained significantly associated with a worse PFS. Higher levels of IL-6 (HR = 3.85, 95%CI: 1.13-20.0) and IL-8 (HR = 4.29, 95%CI: 1.98-9.83) at T2 and a RI of IL-8 (HR = 3.06, 95%CI: 1.43-6.72) remained significantly associated with a worse OS. Conclusions: High serum levels of IL-8 and IL-6 at T2 of ICI, combined with an increase of IL-8 from baseline, are strong predictors of PD, PFS, OS, in pts with advanced Mel and NSCLC. The role of the other cytokines tested, their time fluctuations and associations with clinical prognostic factors, gender, and immuno-related adverse events will be presented at the meeting.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib with PD-1 blockades in the treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer: A real-world study.

e16129 Background: Several clinical trials have demonstrated that antiangiogenic drugs combined with PD-1 blockades are effective for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, the efficacy of this combination in real-world patients needs to be explored. Anlotinib is a novel oral multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor for tumor angiogenesis and proliferation, which had been licensed for treatment of considerable malignancies in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades in the treatment of advanced BTC in real world. Methods: This is a multi-center prospective real-world study. Patients with advanced BTC receiving anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockades were recruited. Clinical efficacy was summarized, and adverse events were documented. Tumor response was assessed by investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: From May 2020 to Sep 2021, a total of 14 eligible pts were recruited. 1 patient was in stage IIIa, 4 pts in stage IIIb, and 9 pts in stage IV. Among them, 10 pts received anlotinib as first-line treatment, 3 pts as second-line treatment and 1 pts as third-line treatment. DCR was 85.71% (57.19%, 98.22%). At the data cut-off date, 7 pts discontinued treatment due to disease progression, the preliminarily prognostic results indicated that the median OS was 8.21 months (95%CI: 5.88, NA) and the median PFS of the 14pts was 6.28 months (95%CI: 3.17-8.21). The safety profile suggested that the most common drug-related adverse events were hypertension (21.43%), decreased white blood cell count (21.43%), decreased platelet count (21.43%), hypoalbuminemia (14.29%), vomit (14.29%), gastrointestinal bleeding (14.29%). The common grade 3 adverse event were gastrointestinal bleeding (7.14%), anemia (7.14%), biliary infection (7.14%). Conclusions: Present study indicated that the combination of anlotinib and PD-1 blockades exhibited potential efficacy and manageable adverse events in the treatment of advanced BTC in the real world. The conclusion should be validated in more patients included subsequently. Clinical trial information: NCT04954521.

39-OR: Improved Psychosocial and Quality of Life Measures in Children and Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Initiating Control-IQ Technology

Objective: To determine perceptions of the impact of Control-IQ™ technology (CIQ) on psychosocial functioning and quality of life (QoL) in children/ youth with T1D and their parents, using patient and parent reported outcome measures (PROMs) . Research Design and Methods: Single-center prospective real-world study of 6-18 year olds with T1D using the t:slim X2™ insulin pump, who were initiating CIQ. Youth (≥ 8years) and parents completed validated PROMs at baseline and end of study (16 weeks) . INSPIRE (INsulin delivery Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations) end of study scores were the primary outcome with a score &amp;gt; 60 considered to indicate a perceived benefit of CIQ on psychosocial functioning and QoL. Glycemic control measures were recorded at baseline and every 4 weeks. Results: In total, 65 children/youth with T1D participated; 50.8% female, median (IQR) age 13.9 (11.1, 15.7) years and T1D duration 6.2 (3.1, 8.4) years. INSPIRE end of study mean (SD) scores were 73.0 (11.6) for youth (n=49) and 70.7 (12.2) for parents (n=45) , both significantly &amp;gt; 60 (p &amp;lt; 0.001) . Diabetes Impact and Devices Satisfaction - Device Satisfaction subscale score increased by a mean (95% CI) of 0.43 (0.11, 0.74) in youth (p = 0.01) and 0.58 (0.31, 0.85) in parents (p&amp;lt;0.001) . WHO-5 well-being index median (IQR) score increased from 60 (48, 76) to 72 (60, 80) (p=0.25) in youth, and from 68 (55, 76) to 76 (68, 80) (p=0.002) in parents. Hypoglycemia Fear Survey mean (SD) score improved from 1.7 (0.6) to 1.4 (0.5) (p=0.01) in youth and from 2.0 (0.7) to 1.7 (0.6) (p&amp;lt;0.001) in parents. Time in range improved from 50.8% (baseline) to 62.2% (4 weeks) , with mean difference (95% CI) 9.62 (7.01, 12.23) , p&amp;lt;0.001; this was sustained to 16 weeks. Conclusions: Initiation of CIQ in a real-world setting significantly improved measures of psychosocial functioning and QoL in children/youth with T1D and their parents. The change tended to be greater for parents than youth. Disclosure C.S.Zuijdwijk: Other Relationship; Medtronic, Research Support; Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. J.Courtney: None. N.Mitsakakis: None. L.Hayawi: None. S.E.Lawrence: Advisory Panel; Pfizer Inc., Research Support; Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. Funding Tandem Diabetes Care