Prophylactic Platelet Transfusions Research Articles

Dominant immune response to HLA-B57/B58 molecules after platelet transfusion.

Patients with hematologic malignancies require prophylactic or curative platelet transfusions to prevent or treat bleeding. Treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation cause persistent thrombocytopenia, necessitating platelet transfusions. However, class I HLA antibodies can cause a serious complication: immune-mediated platelet refractoriness. The mechanisms of alloimmunization are incompletely understood. We explored the immunogenicity of HLA molecules and the phenotype of the HLA-specific CD4+ T cells involved in alloimmunization. We investigated the role of HLA molecules in platelet transfusion immunogenicity in a retrospective cohort study on men with specific anti-HLA who had undergone transfusion. We investigated the presence and phenotypic profile of HLA-specific CD4+ T cells in alloimmunized patients included in long-term platelet transfusion programs for hematologic malignancies. More than 50% of the transfused subjects displayed an antibody response against HLA-B57 or -B58. HLA-B57-specific CD4+ T-cell responses were observed in patients alloimmunized against HLA-B57. Following specific stimulation, the patients presented HLA-specific CD4+ T cells producing tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-13, IL-17A, IL-2, IL-10, and IL-21. These results shed light on posttransfusion class I anti-HLA alloimmunization mechanisms and constitute a first step toward developing new strategies for reducing refractoriness.

Cost- Effectiveness of Avatrombopag for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease.

Background and AimThrombocytopenia is common in people with chronic liver disease, who frequently undergo invasive procedures. To minimize the risk of bleeding, prophylactic platelet transfusions have traditionally been used but carry many risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of avatrombopag compared with platelet transfusion and lusutrombopag as a treatment for thrombocytopenia in adult patients with chronic liver disease scheduled to undergo a medical procedure.MethodsA decision-tree model was developed from a US payer perspective to capture acute events observed in phase 3 global randomized controlled clinical trials and, to support exploratory analyses, potential longer-term complications resulting from a major bleed or thromboembolic event. Treatment costs were taken from publicly available data sources. The interventions were evaluated in the overall trial populations and in subpopulations with higher and lower baseline platelet counts. Results were presented as incremental cost per platelet transfusion avoided. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.ResultsIn the overall population, avatrombopag reduced the need for platelet transfusions and produced cost-savings compared with platelet transfusion (80% fewer prophylactic platelet transfusions, $4250 lower costs) and lusutrombopag (42% fewer prophylactic platelet transfusions, $5819 lower costs). Similar results were seen in both the higher and lower platelet count subpopulations. The one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses found that the use of avatrombopag is cost-saving with the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in quadrant IV (decreased costs, prophylactic platelet transfusions avoided).ConclusionThe use of avatrombopag is expected to be cost-saving while reducing the need for prophylactic platelet transfusions compared with platelet transfusion and lusutrombopag.

1715P Plinabulin (Plin) is a more favorable option for the prevention of chemotherapy induced neutropenia (CIN) than pegfilgrastim (Peg) during the COVID-19 pandemic

Due to COVID-19, the NCCN Myeloid Growth Factor Panel expanded prophylactic G-CSF use to chemotherapy with Intermediate Risk (10%-20% risk) of Febrile Neutropenia (FN), and to Low Risk FN patients (pts) who previously developed FN. Preservation of resources for COVID-19 pts by reducing hospitalizations and emergency room visits by cancer chemotherapy pts is the intent of these changed recommendations. Other recommendations include use of self-injecting or on-body injector Peg, to minimize COVID-19 exposure at outpatient center by cancer pts and limiting prophylactic platelet transfusion to preserve blood product supply. Plin is an attractive alternative: it is a novel, non-G-CSF small molecule with CIN protection comparable to Peg, is given once 30 minutes after Chemo, and avoids the need for healthcare system touches on Day 1-3 for G-CSF administration. In contrast to Peg, Plin does not cause bone pain and thrombocytopenia and maintains quality of life. We compared the combined CIN data with single agent (SA) Plin 20 mg/m2 (n=29) vs. SA Peg 6mg (n=35) from 2 different phase II CIN studies over 4 cycles: 1. Study 105 in NSCLC pts given Intermediate FN Risk Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (Doc) pts with risk factors), and 2. Study 106 in Breast cancer pts given High FN Risk Doc +Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 + Cyclophosphamide 50mg/m2 (TAC). Plin was given as a single IV infusion on Day (D)1, 30 min after the last Chemo, and Peg 6mg given on D2 by SC injection. Grade 4 Neutropenia (Gr 4 N), Hospitalizations (Hosp), Infection rate (Inf), Sepsis (Sep), all Grade Thrombocytopenia (T) or Gr 2/3 T and Bone Pain (BoP) is summarized for SA Plin and SA Peg. (NS= non-significant). Table: 1715PGr 4 NHospInfSepAll Gr TGr 2/3 TGr 3 TBoPPegfilgrastim42.9%11.4%5.71%0%68.6%20%8.57%YesPlinabulin44.8%13.8%6.90%3.44%24.1%3.4%0%Nop-valueNSNSNSNS0.00020.0250.06- Open table in a new tab . Plin requires at least 50% fewer touches to the health care system and is equally effective as Peg for prevention of CIN and its clinical sequelae. Plin causes less thrombopenia and bone pain. Plin (given as a 40 mg fixed dose) is currently in two phase III trials for CIN.

Perioperative considerations in a girl with Glanzmann thrombasthenia. Case report

Introduction: Glanzmann thromboasthenia is a rare congenital bleeding disorder caused by a mutation in platelet glycoprotein α-IIb and β3 encoding genes (ITGA2B; 607759 and ITGB3; 173470) in chromosomes 17q21.31 and 17q21.32 , respectively, which results in a qualitative or quantitative alteration of the platelet integrin αIIbβ3 (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) receptor. Glanzmann thromboasthenia is classified as type I when less than 5% of glycoprotein αIIbβ3 is expressed, and as type II when more than 5% is expressed.
 Case presentation: Description of the perioperative management of a 13-year-old female patient with Glanzmann thromboasthenia who underwent endoscopic anterior bilateral ethmoidectomy. Management was centered on prophylactic platelet transfusion plus the use of tranexamic acid, as well as thromboelastographic determination of hemostasis. There were no bleeding complications during or after the procedure.
 Conclusions: Pediatric patients with Glanzmann thromboasthenia are at a high risk of perioperastive bleeding. Platelet transfusion is the best prophylactic and therapeutic alternative; however, even in the absence of anti-platelet antibodies, it may not be effective, and viscoelastic testing must be used for assessment during the surgical procedure in order to improve patient safety.

Phase I trial of docetaxel plus lutetium-177-labeled anti–prostate‐specific membrane antigen monoclonal antibody J591 (177Lu‐J591) for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer

BackgroundDocetaxel remains a standard of care for metatsatic castration resistant porstate cancer (mCRPC) and has radiosensitizing properties. The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of radioimmunotherapy is myelosuppression; dose fractionation of 177Lu-J591 allows similar administered doses with less toxicity. This study (NCT00916123) was designed to determine the safety, DLT, and maximum tolerated dose of fractionated 177Lu-J591 administered concurrently with standard docetaxel. MethodsMen with progressive mCRPC received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks with escalating 2 fractionated doses of 177Lu-J591 (1.48 GBq/m2 up to max of 2.96 GBq/m2) with cycle 3. Cycle 4 of docetaxel was planned 6 weeks after cycle 3 to allow for recovery from 177Lu-J591-associated hematologic toxicity. DLT was defined as delay in docetaxel >3 weeks, prolonged myelosuppression or need for >2 platelet transfusions, febrile neutropenia, or grade ≥3 nonhematological toxicity following 177Lu-J591. PSA was assessed prior to each cycle and serial computed tomography (CT) and bone scan were performed. ResultsFifteen men with progressive mCRPC received dose-escalated targeted radionuclide therapy in 4 cohorts up to the highest planned dose (2.96 GBq/m2). No DLT was seen at any dose level. Grade 4 neutropenia without fever occurred in 8 (53.5%) and thromboytopenia in 2 (13.3%), with 2 receiving prophylactic platelet transfusion. No grade ≥3 nonhematological toxicity was observed. 11 (73.3%) had >50% PSA decline, with 78.6% having favorable circulating tumor cell counts after 177Lu-J591. All patients had targeting of known sites of disease by planar 177Lu-J591 imaging. ConclusionThe combination of 177Lu-J591 delivered as a single fractionated cycle with docetaxel/prednisone is feasible in patients with mCRPC. Without preselection for prostate-specific membrane antigen, accurate targeting of known sites of disease and a strong preliminary efficacy signal was observed.

Risk factors for bleeding in haemato-oncology patients-a nested case-control study: The BITE study protocol (Bleeding In Thrombocytopenia Explained).

IntroductionHaemato-oncological patients often receive platelet count driven prophylactic platelet transfusions to prevent bleeding. However, many prophylactically transfused patients still bleed. More knowledge on risk factors for bleeding is therefore needed. This will enable identification of bleeding risk profiles on which future transfusion policy can be optimised. The present BITE study (Bleeding In Thrombocytopenia Explained) aims to identify clinical conditions and biomarkers that are associated with clinically relevant bleeding events.Methods and analysisA matched case–control study nested in a cohort of haemato-oncological patients in the Netherlands. We collect a limited number of variables from all eligible patients, who together form the source population. These patients are followed for the occurrence of clinically relevant bleeding. Consenting patients of the source population form the cohort. Cases from the cohort are frequency matched to selected control patients for the nested case–control study. Of both case and control patients more detailed clinical data is collected.Study populationAdult haemato-oncological patients, who are admitted for intensive chemotherapeutic treatment or stem cell transplantation, or who received such treatments in the past and are readmitted for disease or treatment-related adverse events.Statistical analysisBleeding incidences will be calculated for the total source population, as well as for different subgroups. The association between potential risk factors and the occurrence of bleeding will be analysed using conditional logistic regression, to account for matching of case and control patients.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden Den Haag and Delft, and the Radboudumc Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects. Approval in seven other centres is foreseen. Patients will be asked for written informed consent and data is coded before analyses, according to Dutch privacy law. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNL62499.058.17. NCT03505086; Pre-results.

Trends in platelet distributions from 2008 to 2017: a survey of twelve national and regional blood collectors.

This multi-national study evaluated changes in platelet (PLT) unit distributions at 12 national or regional blood collectors over a 10-year period. Data on the total number of PLT distributions, the collection method, that is apheresis vs whole blood-derived (WBD), the PLT unit characteristics and post-collection modifications were obtained from 12 national or regional blood collectors from 2008 through 2017. Individual WBD PLT units were converted to apheresis equivalent units (i.e. a dose of PLTs) by dividing by 4, the typical pool size; WBD units that were pooled before distribution were counted as a single dose. Overall at these 12 blood collectors, the total number of PLTs distributed in 2008 was 1373200, which rose by 10·2% to 1513803 in 2017. The Japanese Red Cross, which distributes only apheresis PLTs, had a 13·4% increase in the number of distributions between the years 2008 and 2017, while the other 11 blood collectors combined demonstrated a 6·8% increase in distributions between these two years. Between the years 2008 and 2017, the changes in the proportion of apheresis, platelet-rich plasma and buffy coat PLT distributions were -29·9%, -70·7% and 80·0%, respectively. The number of PLT distributions increased during the 10-year study period despite prophylactic PLT transfusion thresholds having remained fairly consistent over the last decade. Perhaps this increase is in part driven by increased administration of platelets to patients with massive haemorrhage or an increase in stem cell transplantation. The use of buffy coat PLTs is increasing at these collectors.

Central venous catheterization in cancer patients with severe thrombocytopenia: Ultrasound-guide improves safety avoiding prophylactic platelet transfusion.

Prior research has revealed that ultrasound (US) guided central venous catheterization (CVC) is associated with a reduction in the complication rate such as pneumothorax and an improved first-pass success placing CVC in the internal jugular vein. The present study investigated if US-guided CVC, in a subset of cancer patients with severe thrombocytopenia, reduced bleeding risk and avoided prophylactic platelet transfusion. The efficacy and safety of US-guided CVC placement in cancer patients with severe thrombocytopenia was retrospectively analyzed over a period of 9 years (Dec 2000-Jan 2009), 1,660 and 207 patients with cancer underwent US-guided CVC placement into internal jugular vein respectively at the Department of Onco-Haematology, Hospital of Piacenza. The first group of patients included patients in active antitumor treatment, while the second group included patients in the palliative phase. A total of 110 (5.89%) of these 1,867 patients exhibited severe thrombocytopenia defined as platelet count ≤20x109/l, and formed the basis of this study. All procedures were evaluated for bleeding complications as defined by the National Institute of Health Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE 3.0). In the subgroup of the 110 patients with severe thrombocytopenia a single needle puncture of the vein was employed in 121 of the 122 procedures (99.18%) and no attempt failures were registered. No pneumothorax, no major bleeding and no nerve and arterial puncture were reported, only one self-limiting hematoma (0.90%) at the site of CVC insertion was reported (CTCAE 3.0 grade 1). No platelet transfusions were performed in the 110 patients, pre and post CVC placement. We believe that US-guided CVC insertion procedures into the internal jugular vein makes the difference in safety, also in thrombocytopenic patients avoiding prophylactic or post procedure platelet transfusion.

Prophylactic use of platelets in critically ill patients with thrombocytopaenia: A retrospective two-centre observational study

PurposeWe report the use and effect of prophylactic platelet transfusions in critically ill thrombocytopaenic patients, comparing patients with or without bone marrow failure as a cause of thrombocytopaenia. MethodsA retrospective observational study of admissions to three intensive care units (ICU) in the UK. We identified thrombocytopaenic patients who received a platelet transfusion and extracted the platelet count prior and subsequent to platelet transfusion. We grouped patients with or without suspected bone marrow failure, defined by a total white cell count ≤1.0 × 109/L. ResultsOf 11,757 admissions, 399 (3.4%) patients received a platelet transfusion for thrombocytopaenia. The median [IQR] platelet count prior to transfusion in patients without bone marrow failure was 42 [28–64] × 109/L versus 14 [7–24] × 109/L (p < .0001) in those with. The median [IQR] increment in platelets following transfusion was lower in patients with marrow failure (12 [−1−23] × 109/L) compared to those without (18 [5–36] × 109/L) (p = .006). ConclusionsPlatelet transfusions were given at a higher median platelet count than suggested by guidelines. Patients with bone marrow failure were transfused at a lower threshold and experienced a smaller increment in platelet count when compared to patients without marrow failure.

Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusion in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

BackgroundCurrently, the risk factors associated with chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are still undefined. Our study aimed to analyze the effects of risk factors on thrombocytopenia and to identify the threshold for infusion platelets of CIT patients who have received platelet transfusions.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 523 patients with DLBCL from 2011 to 2013. The clinical and demographic parameters were extracted, and the risk factors associated with CIT were analyzed. The threshold for platelet transfusions in DLBCL patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) was evaluated.ResultsA total of 227 (43.4%) DLBCL patients had thrombocytopenia, and 63 (12.0%) had thrombocytopenia without concomitant cytopenia. We found that the choice of chemotherapy regimen was positively correlated with thrombocytopenia (P<0.001). The chemotherapy regimens most likely to result in thrombocytopenia were dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin (DHAP) (92.3%), isophosphamide, carboplatin, etoposide (ICE) (89.7%), gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin (GDP) (89.7%), gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin (Gemox) (69.0%). In addition to these, high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (P=0.004) and Ann Arbor stage III/IV (P=0.024) were determined to be risk factors leading to thrombocytopenia. Forty patients (17.6%) had transfused platelets, and all of them were placed in the CVC. The high-threshold group (platelet count ≤20×109/L had a significantly lower amount of platelet transfusions than the low-threshold group ≤10×109/L. The platelet transfusion amount was 1.44±0.77 vs. 2.05±1.13 (P=0.047), respectively.ConclusionsThe chemotherapy regimens of DHAP, ICE, GDP, and Gemox can easily lead to thrombocytopenia. A high level of LDH in the peripheral blood and Ann Arbor stage III/IV are also associated with risk factors for thrombocytopenia. A 20×109/L prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold value is safer, more effective, and thus a better choice for DLBCL patients with CVC.

Bleeding risk in thrombocytopenic patients after dental extractions: a retrospective single-center study.

The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical safety profile of dental extractions in patients with thrombocytopenia and explore the effectiveness of platelet transfusion before dental extractions. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with moderate to severe (≤100,000/μL) thrombocytopenia who underwent dental extractions in the Oral Medicine and Dentistry Clinic at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2003 to 2019. Patients with a platelet count <30,000/μL received prophylactic preprocedure platelet transfusion. Risk and type of bleeding complication (prolonged postoperative bleeding requiring intervention with topical hemostatic agents and/or therapeutic platelet transfusions) was assessed. Eighty-nine thrombocytopenic patients were identified. Postextraction bleeding complications occurred in 4 patients (4.4%). Surgical extractions and multiple number of extractions were significantly associated with an increased bleeding risk (P < .05), whereas prophylactic platelet transfusion and post-transfusion platelet count were not. Dental extractions in patients with thrombocytopenia may be performed with a positive safety profile by following a comprehensive medical evaluation, thorough treatment planning, adequate surgical management, use of local hemostatic measures, and, importantly, coordination of care with the patient's medical team.

Avatrombopag, an Alternate Treatment Option to Reduce Platelet Transfusions in Patients with Thrombocytopenia and Chronic Liver Disease-Integrated Analyses of 2 Phase 3 Studies.

Aims Thrombocytopenia complicates the management of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) undergoing invasive procedures with a bleeding risk. Until recently, prophylactic platelet transfusion was the only treatment option, but has significant safety and efficacy limitations. Phase 3 data demonstrated the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions for bleeding, supporting its recent approval. Methods Integrated analyses of pooled data (N = 435) from two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies assessed the original efficacy endpoints. Additional analyses included subgroup analyses, alternate Baseline platelet count definitions, and another efficacy endpoint. Results Avatrombopag was superior to placebo in increasing patients not requiring a platelet transfusion or rescue procedure, those achieving a platelet count ≥50 × 109/L on Procedure Day, and the change in platelet counts from Baseline. The avatrombopag treatment effect was consistently positive across clinically important disease and Baseline clinical characteristic subgroups, and using alternate Baseline platelet count cohort definitions. Similarly, more avatrombopag-treated patients achieved ≥50 × 109/L platelets with an increase of ≥20 × 109/L from Baseline. The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between avatrombopag and placebo. Further, safety data demonstrated a low risk for thromboembolic events and hepatotoxicity. Conclusion These integrated analyses confirmed the superiority of avatrombopag to placebo in reducing platelet transfusions or rescue procedures for bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia and CLD scheduled to undergo an invasive procedure, and its tolerable safety profile. Importantly, these data warrant reconsideration of clinical decision making regarding the need to treat thrombocytopenia in patients with CLD. This trial was registered with NCT01972529 and NCT01976104.

Pre-Transplant Baseline Platelet Count and the Number of Peri-HSCT Transfusions Are Associated with an Increased Disease-Free Mortality Rate in a Large Pediatric Cohort

<h3>Introduction</h3> Platelets play a key role in the innate immune system as a source of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Lower platelet counts are associated with higher mortality in hospitalized adults with a variety of diseases, and platelet count <50,000 K/uL on arrival to the intensive care unit in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is associated with decreased survival. Transfusion of platelets is common after HSCT for prevention and management of bleeding. <h3>Objective</h3> We hypothesized that platelet count prior to initiation of conditioning influences post-transplant outcomes, in part by increasing the need for platelet transfusions. <h3>Methods</h3> We retrospectively analyzed 388 patients undergoing first allogeneic HSCT at Cincinnati Children's. The last non-transfused platelet count at the time of admission for HSCT or start of conditioning regimen was considered the baseline platelet count (BPC). Patients transplanted for bone marrow failure syndromes were excluded due to underlying cytopenias. <h3>Results</h3> 35.8% of the cohort was transplanted for malignancy, 45.3% immunodeficiency, 11.6% hemoglobinopathies, and 6.7% genetic conditions. 114/388 patients in the cohort died (29%). Leading cause of death was acute graft-vs-host disease (aGVHD) followed by organ failure, primary disease, infection, and chronic GVHD (Fig 1a). BPC was significantly lower in deceased patients with no difference seen in baseline hemoglobin (Fig 1b). BPC correlated with the number of platelet transfusion by day +14 after HSCT, with a correlation coefficient of -0.49 (p < 0.001). BPC and the number of peri-transplant platelet transfusions were strongly associated with overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM), while baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and conditioning regimen showed no association with OS (Fig 1c, d; Fig 2). Neither BPC nor the number of platelet transfusions influenced the risk for developing thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) but lower BPC did increase the risk for developing moderate and especially severe GVHD (Fig 2). To investigate if low BPC is simply a marker for more ill and higher risk patient, we analyzed the subcohort of patients with a BPC in the normal range (> 135 K/uL). Lower BPC and the number of platelet transfusions were still associated with the risk for OS and NRM (Fig 3) <h3>Conclusion</h3> In a large cohort, lower BPC but not baseline hemoglobin or ANC are associated with more platelet transfusions and increased risk for NRM and worse OS. While platelet transfusions have previously been implicated in endothelial damage, this effect is independent of TMA risk. BPC is associated with the risk for GVHD, which is the leading cause of death in the cohort, although this appears independent of transfusion burden. Mechanistic studies are ongoing but these data suggest the need for thoughtful consideration of prophylactic platelet transfusion thresholds.

Platelet Transfusion Practice in Dengue Epidemic; Current Trends and Challenges ? an Institutional Study

Introduction: Dengue is an arboviral disease with an inherited risk associated with the transfusion of blood components and to prevent unnecessary transfusion during dengue epidemic a standard criteria has to be followed. Aims/objectives: To record clinical features, laboratory investigations and management of hospitalized seropositive dengue patients. To review the appropriateness of platelet transfusion practices in order to ensure optimal utilization of platelets. Material and methods: The Retrospective study is being done at RL Jalappa Medical Hospital from April 2015 to June 2019 on seropositive dengue cases. All serologically confirmed dengue cases who received platelet transfusion were included in the study. Patient’s clinical data and platelet counts were obtained from platelet requisition forms and Medical Record Department. Case definition of Dengue/DHF/DSS applied in the present study was as recommended by WHO4 i.e. Guidelines for platelet transfusion in R. L. Jallappa Hospital Hospital were utilized as the criteria to assess the appropriateness of platelet transfusion adapted from British Committee for Standardization in Hematology (BCSH) has recommended a platelet count <10000/cmm for prophylactic platelet transfusion in those with no other risk factors which would increase the risk of bleeding. Statistical analysis: Data management and analysis was done by SPSS version 22.0. Results: During study period total of 1361 cases were diagnosed as dengue infection (out of which 757-males, 604-females). Maximum cases were seen in the age group of 11-18. All patients were categorized as per WHO dengue case classification into Dengue Fever, Dengue Haemorrhagic Fever, and Dengue Shock syndrome. In which 72.5% of patients were DF, 23.4% were DHF and 4% of DSS. In present study, maximum number of Patients and platelets transfused was seen when platelet count was 11-20 × 1000/cmm that is 777 units in which RDP was 697 and SDP was 80 and lowest number of platelets transfused was seen when platelet count was >60. A total of 2705 RDP and 359 SDP were transfused to 1361 patients, of these 1361 patients, 316 bleeding patient received PT and 1045 non bleeding patient received prophylactic platelet transfusion in which 140 patient was requiring actual platelet transfusion and 905 patients were not needed. Conclusion: Inappropriate usage of platelets leads to shortage of platelets. Strict adherence to British Committee for Standardization in Hematology (BCSH) Guidelines will optimize platelet usage with this true DHF and DSS will be benefited during epidemic outbreaks. Educating patients and Patients attenders will help reducing anxiety and this in turn help clinician for better judgment on evidence based transfusion reducing inappropriate transfusion. This study emphasis on platelet usage trends in regional areas and highlighting.

Platelet Transfusion: And Update on Challenges and Outcomes.

Platelet transfusion is a common practice in onco-hematologic patients for preventing or treating hemorrhages. Platelet concentrates can be transfused with therapeutic or prophylactic purposes. With the aim to help clinicians to take the decisions on platelet transfusion, some guidelines have been developed based on the current scientific evidence. However, there are some controversial issues and available scientific evidence is not enough to solve them. There is little information about what is the best platelet product to be transfused: random platelets or single donor apheresis platelets, and plasma-suspended or additive solution suspended platelets. Platelets are often transfused without respecting the ABO compatibility, but influence of this practice on platelet transfusion outcome is not well established. In the prophylactic platelet transfusion set there are some questions unsolved as the platelet threshold to transfuse prior to specific procedures or surgery, and even if platelet transfusion is necessary for some specific procedures as autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A challenging complication raised from multiple platelet transfusions is the platelet transfusion refractoriness. The study and management of this complication is often disappointing. In summary, although it is a widespread practice, platelet transfusion has still many controversial and unknown issues. The objective of this article is to review the current evidence on platelet transfusion practices, focusing on the controversial issues and challenges.

The Role of Platelets in Cancer-Related Bleeding Risk: A Systematic Review.

Cancer patients face an elevated risk of bleeding, and here platelets play a pivotal role. The association between platelet count and bleeding, as well as safe thresholds for prophylactic platelet transfusion, is described mainly in hematological malignancies, and knowledge is sparse for patients with solid tumors. Platelet function tests may further improve bleeding risk assessment in cancer patients. This study provides a systematic review of the available literature on associations between platelet count and/or function and bleeding in adult cancer patients. The review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched up to August 2019. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's tools were used for quality assessment. In total, 52 studies investigated associations between bleeding and platelet count (n = 40) or function (n = 12) in patients with hematological malignancy (n = 31), solid tumors (n = 11), or both (n = 10). The majority of included studies rated good (n = 23) or fair (n = 25). The association between platelet count and bleeding was most pronounced at platelet counts ≤ 10 × 109/L but was less evident for solid tumors. Overall, reduced platelet function was significantly associated with bleeding risk. Thus, the available evidence supports current guidelines for prophylactic platelet transfusions at platelet count ≤ 10 × 109/L in hematological cancer patients, whereas more evidence is needed in patients with solid tumors. Platelet function analysis may be valuable in assisting bleeding risk assessment in cancer patients but is sparsely investigated so far.

Preterm neonates benefit from low prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold despite varying risk of bleeding or death

AbstractThe Platelets for Neonatal Thrombocytopenia (PlaNeT-2) trial reported an unexpected overall benefit of a prophylactic platelet transfusion threshold of 25 × 109/L compared with 50 × 109/L for major bleeding and/or mortality in preterm neonates (7% absolute-risk reduction). However, some neonates in the trial may have experienced little benefit or even harm from the 25 × 109/L threshold. We wanted to assess this heterogeneity of treatment effect in the PlaNet-2 trial, to investigate whether all preterm neonates benefit from the low threshold. We developed a multivariate logistic regression model in the PlaNet-2 data to predict baseline risk of major bleeding and/or mortality for all 653 neonates. We then ranked the neonates based on their predicted baseline risk and categorized them into 4 risk quartiles. Within these quartiles, we assessed absolute-risk difference between the 50 × 109/L- and 25 × 109/L-threshold groups. A total of 146 neonates died or developed major bleeding. The internally validated C-statistic of the model was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.68). The 25 × 109/L threshold was associated with absolute-risk reduction in all risk groups, varying from 4.9% in the lowest risk group to 12.3% in the highest risk group. These results suggest that a 25 × 109/L prophylactic platelet count threshold can be adopted in all preterm neonates, irrespective of predicted baseline outcome risk. Future studies are needed to improve the predictive accuracy of the baseline risk model. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as #ISRCTN87736839.

The burden associated with thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusions among patients with chronic liver disease

Background: Thrombocytopenia (TCP), a common complication of chronic liver disease (CLD), can cause uncontrolled bleeding during procedures. As such, CLD patients with TCP and platelet counts <50,000/μL often receive prophylactic platelet transfusions before invasive procedures. However, platelet transfusions are associated with clinical complications, which may result in increased healthcare utilization and costs.Objective: This retrospective database analysis describes the clinical and economic burden in CLD patients with TCP, CLD patients without TCP, and CLD patients with TCP who receive platelet transfusions.Methods: Adult CLD patients with or without TCP were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental data from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2015. CLD patients with or without TCP were propensity-score matched (1:1) for the analysis of annual healthcare utilization and costs. Platelet transfusions among CLD patients with TCP were identified using procedure codes.Results: Of the 601,626 patients with CLD, 8,292 (1.4%) patients with TCP were matched to patients without TCP. Among CLD patients with TCP, 981 (11.8%) patients received ≥1 platelet transfusions and met inclusion/exclusion criteria. Compared to patients without TCP, CLD patients with TCP had more complications, including higher prevalence of neutropenia (11.4% vs 2.9%) and bleeding events (21.4% vs 10.9%), greater resource utilization including greater average hospital admissions (1.2 vs 0.7, p < .01), greater average ER visits (2.1 vs 1.3, p < .01), higher average outpatient office visits (20.1 vs 18.4, p < .01), and higher average healthcare costs including total costs (p < .01), inpatient costs (p < .01), ER visit costs (p < .01), and outpatient office visit costs (p < .01). The mean annual total costs in CLD and TCP patients with platelet transfusions were $206,396.Conclusions: CLD patients with TCP, and particularly those who received platelet transfusions, experienced significantly greater clinical and economic burden compared to CLD patients without TCP. Safer and more cost-effective treatments to increase platelets are necessary.

Platelet Transfusion in Perioperative Medicine.

Platelet transfusions aim to improve primary hemostasis and to prevent or treat bleeding in patients with reduced platelet numbers and/or platelet function. In this review, the authors address the role of platelet transfusions with a focus on perioperative medicine. They summarize different causes of thrombocytopenia in perioperative patients, describe general characteristics and potential adverse effects of different platelet concentrates, describe principles of perioperative platelet transfusion strategies, and highlight specific perioperative scenarios, for example, in patients undergoing antiplatelet therapy. The evidence for any transfusion threshold in perioperative patients based on platelet numbers is low. The evidence supporting prophylactic platelet transfusions in the perioperative setting is very low, and all recommended thresholds for preintervention platelet transfusions are based on weak evidence or expert opinion. Besides the platelet count, platelet function, additional risk factors for bleeding, and the pharmacokinetic properties of concomitant antiplatelet drugs are important criteria for the decision to transfuse or not to transfuse platelets. The few available prospective trials give at least a signal that a liberal platelet transfusion strategy might be associated with poorer outcomes compared with a restrictive platelet transfusion strategy in critically ill patients. Given the unknown risks for adverse outcomes, a therapeutic transfusion strategy during surgery (eventually guided by point of care testing in cardiac surgery, major liver surgery, and major trauma) may be most appropriate for interventions, in which intraoperative bleeding can be controlled until platelets are available, and during the postsurgery period.

Dual antiplatelet therapy up to the time of non-elective coronary artery bypass grafting with prophylactic platelet transfusion: is it safe?

BackgroundGuidelines suggest that patients discontinue Clopidogrel at least 5 days prior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Those with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high risk for myocardial infarction (MI) if not treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We sought to assess pre and post-operative outcomes of patients maintained on Clopidogrel and aspirin up to the time of surgery and compare them with those on aspirin alone.MethodsFrom the cardiac surgery database, 240 patients were retrospectively registered between January and May 2017. There were 126 patients with ACS who underwent CABG on DAPT (Clopidogrel group [CG]) and 114 patients who underwent elective CABG on aspirin alone (control). The CG received intraoperative prophylactic platelet transfusion (PPT). Demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory data were prospectively entered at the time of surgery and were subsequently retrieved for analysis. Per and postoperative findings were identified and compared between both groups.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 240 patients (mean age 61 years, 81.3% were male, SD ± 9.58). Patients in the CG were younger (Median 57 vs. 63, P-value 0.001), and with male predominance (86% versus 75%, P-value 0.028). In addition, they had less prevalence for diabetes and renal failure as compared to control (P-values 0.003, and 0.005, respectively). There were no significant differences between both groups in number of vessels grafts, duration of on-pump and aortic clamp. Hematologic laboratory data had also similar baseline values. The CG had similar bleeding rate, redo surgery and in-hospital death (P-values non-significant), however more infection and total hospital stay as compared to control (p-values 0.048 and 0.001).ConclusionPatients who are at increased risk for MI can be maintained on DAPT up to the time of CABG because surgery is safe when patients are offered PPT.