Promiscuous Coupling Research Articles

Molecular mechanism of the endothelin receptor type B interactions with Gs, Gi, and Gq

The endothelin receptor type B (ETB) exhibits promiscuous coupling with various heterotrimeric G protein subtypes including Gs, Gi/o, Gq/11, and G12/13. Recent fluorescence and structural studies have raised questions regarding the coupling efficiencies and determinants of these G protein subtypes. Herein, by utilizing an integrative approach, combining hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry and NanoLuc Binary Technology-based cellular systems, we investigated conformational changes of Gs, Gi, and Gq triggered by ETB activation. ETB coupled to Gi and Gq but not with Gs. We underscored the critical roles of specific regions, including the C terminus of Gα and intracellular loop 2 (ICL2) of ETB in ETB-Gi1 or ETB-Gq coupling. Although The C terminus of Gα is essential for ETB-Gi1 and ETB-Gq coupling, ETB ICL2 influences Gq-coupling but not Gi1-coupling. Our results suggest a differential coupling efficiency of ETB with Gs, Gi1, and Gq, accompanied by distinct conformational changes in G proteins upon ETB-induced activation.

Dynamic spatiotemporal determinants modulate GPCR:G protein coupling selectivity and promiscuity

Recent studies have shown that G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) show selective and promiscuous coupling to different Gα protein subfamilies and yet the mechanisms of the range of coupling preferences remain unclear. Here, we use Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations on ten GPCR:G protein complexes and show that the location (spatial) and duration (temporal) of intermolecular contacts at the GPCR:Gα protein interface play a critical role in how GPCRs selectively interact with G proteins. We identify that some GPCR:G protein interface contacts are common across Gα subfamilies and others specific to Gα subfamilies. Using large scale data analysis techniques on the MD simulation snapshots we derive a spatio-temporal code for contacts that confer G protein selective coupling and validated these contacts using G protein activation BRET assays. Our results demonstrate that promiscuous GPCRs show persistent sampling of the common contacts more than G protein specific contacts. These findings suggest that GPCRs maintain contact with G proteins through a common central interface, while the selectivity comes from G protein specific contacts at the periphery of the interface.

Selective activation of Gαob by an adenosine A1 receptor agonist elicits analgesia without cardiorespiratory depression

The development of therapeutic agonists for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is hampered by the propensity of GPCRs to couple to multiple intracellular signalling pathways. This promiscuous coupling leads to numerous downstream cellular effects, some of which are therapeutically undesirable. This is especially the case for adenosine A1 receptors (A1Rs) whose clinical potential is undermined by the sedation and cardiorespiratory depression caused by conventional agonists. We have discovered that the A1R-selective agonist, benzyloxy-cyclopentyladenosine (BnOCPA), is a potent and powerful analgesic but does not cause sedation, bradycardia, hypotension or respiratory depression. This unprecedented discrimination between native A1Rs arises from BnOCPA’s unique and exquisitely selective activation of Gob among the six Gαi/o subtypes, and in the absence of β-arrestin recruitment. BnOCPA thus demonstrates a highly-specific Gα-selective activation of the native A1R, sheds new light on GPCR signalling, and reveals new possibilities for the development of novel therapeutics based on the far-reaching concept of selective Gα agonism.

Structures of the human cholecystokinin 1 (CCK1) receptor bound to Gs and Gq mimetic proteins provide insight into mechanisms of G protein selectivity.

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critical regulators of cellular function acting via heterotrimeric G proteins as their primary transducers with individual GPCRs capable of pleiotropic coupling to multiple G proteins. Structural features governing G protein selectivity and promiscuity are currently unclear. Here, we used cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to determine structures of the cholecystokinin (CCK) type 1 receptor (CCK1R) bound to the CCK peptide agonist, CCK-8 and 2 distinct transducer proteins, its primary transducer Gq, and the more weakly coupled Gs. As seen with other Gq/11–GPCR complexes, the Gq–α5 helix (αH5) bound to a relatively narrow pocket in the CCK1R core. Surprisingly, the backbone of the CCK1R and volume of the G protein binding pocket were essentially equivalent when Gs was bound, with the Gs αH5 displaying a conformation that arises from “unwinding” of the far carboxyl-terminal residues, compared to canonically Gs coupled receptors. Thus, integrated changes in the conformations of both the receptor and G protein are likely to play critical roles in the promiscuous coupling of individual GPCRs.

Dynamic Spatiotemporal Determinants Modulate GPCR:G protein Coupling Promiscuity and Biased Signaling

Recent studies have shown that G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) generally maintain a promiscuous coupling repertoire to different Ga protein families. This allows GPCRs to potentiate multiple cell signaling processes, but the mechanism behind how promiscuous GPCRs couple different G proteins remains unclear. Additionally, GPCRs have also been shown to signal through b-arrestins and ligands have been designed to show “bias” in signaling towards b-arrestins versus G proteins. I will demonstrate the importance of both the nature and lifetime of intermolecular contacts between GPCR and G protein or b-arrestin in mediating the coupling strength as well as selective coupling among the G proteins or between G proteins and b-arrestin. Using Molecular Dynamics simulations, we show the temporal persistence of GPCR:tranducer protein residue contacts at the interface play a critical role in selective, biased or promiscuous coupling of the transducer proteins. Our results show that promiscuous GPCRs gain the ability to promiscuously couple likely by shedding constraining contacts that confer selectivity observed among selective GPCRs. We have also used molecular dynamics simulations to identify the residues in the allosteric communication network from the extracellular region to the transducer coupling regions. This residue network shows conserved chemical properties across all class A GPCRs, demonstrating the importance of allosteric communication in modulating ligand bias.

A complex structure of arrestin-2 bound to a G protein-coupled receptor.

Arrestins comprise a family of signal regulators of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which include arrestins 1 to 4. While arrestins 1 and 4 are visual arrestins dedicated to rhodopsin, arrestins 2 and 3 (Arr2 and Arr3) are β-arrestins known to regulate many nonvisual GPCRs. The dynamic and promiscuous coupling of Arr2 to nonvisual GPCRs has posed technical challenges to tackle the basis of arrestin binding to GPCRs. Here we report the structure of Arr2 in complex with neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1), which reveals an overall assembly that is strikingly different from the visual arrestin-rhodopsin complex by a 90° rotation of Arr2 relative to the receptor. In this new configuration, intracellular loop 3 (ICL3) and transmembrane helix 6 (TM6) of the receptor are oriented toward the N-terminal domain of the arrestin, making it possible for GPCRs that lack the C-terminal tail to couple Arr2 through their ICL3. Molecular dynamics simulation and crosslinking data further support the assembly of the Arr2‒NTSR1 complex. Sequence analysis and homology modeling suggest that the Arr2‒NTSR1 complex structure may provide an alternative template for modeling arrestin-GPCR interactions.

PK2β ligand, a splice variant of prokineticin 2, is able to modulate and drive signaling through PKR1 receptor

Prokineticin-2 (PK2) is a secreted bioactive peptide that signals through two GPCRs, the prokineticin receptors (PKRs), and regulates a variety of biological processes including angiogenesis, immunity and nociception. The PK2 primary transcript has two alternative splice variants, PK2 and PK2L (a Long form) which is cleaved in an active peptide, named PK2β that preferentially binds to PKR1 receptor.The aim of this study was to characterize the PK2β.Using different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, we examined the specificity of PKR1 and PKR2 G-protein coupling following PK2β binding. Data obtained in yeast confirmed that PK2 binds both receptors, inducing a comparable response throughout a promiscuous coupling of G protein subtypes. Conversely, we demonstrated, for the first time, that PK2β preferentially binding to PKR1, activates a signaling cascade that not depends on Gαi/o coupling. The binding specificity of PK2β for PKR1 was evaluated by the analysis of PKR mutant in yeast and GST pull-down experiments, suggesting an important role of PKR1 amino-terminal region. We also evaluated the ability of PK2β to differentially activate PKR1 and/or PKR2 by in vivo nociceptive experiments and we showed that PK2β induces intense sensitization of peripheral nociceptors to painful stimuli through the activation of PKR1. To analyze PK2β-induced signal transduction, we demonstrated the inability of PK2β to induce STAT3 protein phosphorylation in organotypic primary explants from mice Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG), an important pain station. The control of the concentration ratio between PK2β and PK2 could be one of the keys to allow the specificity of the cell response of prokineticin signaling pathway.

Cage and Tudor as Process

I mean to isolate here one of the signature concepts ascribed to the music of John Cage, not only in the writings of historians and musicologists, but one to which the composer repeatedly linked his music: the concept of process. It is a noun that permeates much discourse surrounding the creative arts and perhaps paradoxically it might be that due to its ubiquity, musicologists feel little compulsion to clarify what they wish it to mean. It is, in a sense, a musicological problem that hides in plain sight. Composers in the twentieth century began to use the term process, not as a mere descriptor of creative action but as a defining characteristic of their music. Cage was foremost amongst his contemporaries in this regard. The fact that the concept may constitute a differentiating stylistic feature of twentieth century music is of less interest to me than the promiscuous coupling routinely engineered by commentators between the term and any number of disparate musical practices. However, that is less interesting still than the fact that Cage’s own use of the term offers an opportunity to discuss, in a systematic way, many of the musicological problems that Cage’s music raises and which it is the task of musicologists to try and answer. I shall explore the concept of process within the context of some of these issues. My thesis is that ‘process’ is habitually linked with the practice of Cage without sufficient regard its implications for our understanding of his music. Close analysis of the term will help elucidate some of the main features that characterise his work and may unearth tools that aid us in crafting answers to questions regarding authorship and ontology in the music of John Cage.

Ca2+ releasing process and nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate

The paper is devoted to recognizing of nicotinic acid adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NAADP) as releaser of intracellular calcium from intracellular stores. It was revealed the current concepts of the mechanisms of NAADP synthesis inside the cell resuming involve enzyme CD38. The effect of NAADP was described in several cells and tissue preparation, as well as in sea urchin eggs. Briefly, it was characterized the acidic store of cells, that is sensitive to NAADP as it had been shown by different authors. Assumed mechanisms of Ca 2+ accumulating in acidic store predict involve proton gradient across membrane of acidic store. The channels structure of acidic store and endoplasmatic reticulum are considered as receptors to NAADP. Potential mechanisms for NAADP-induced calcium release was considered: direct model, trigger Ca 2+ -induced Ca 2+ -releasing model, promiscuous coupling model, conformational coupling model and also unifying hypothesis, that explains the differences between other mechanisms. Physiological processes in which NAADP is involved are described. Keywords : NAADP, acidic store, Ca 2+ , ryanodine receptor, two-pore channels.

Predicting Coupling Specificity of GPCRs Based on the Optimization of the Coupling Regions

Prediction of promiscuous coupling between G-protein coupling receptors (GPCRs) and various G-proteins is one of the challenges for current research. In this article, a novel method that based on the optimization of the coupling regions is proposed. The cross validation results demonstrate that it can achieve an average accuracy of over 80% for promiscuous coupling prediction. The results further suggest that the optimized coupling regions may be important for the processes of signal transduction pathways.

Urocortin 3 elevates cytosolic calcium in nucleus ambiguus neurons.

Urocortin 3 (also known as stresscopin) is an endogenous ligand for the corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 2 (CRF(2)). Despite predominant G(s) coupling of CRF(2), promiscuous coupling with other G proteins has been also associated with the activation of this receptor. As urocortin 3 has been involved in central cardiovascular regulation at hypothalamic and medullary sites, we examined its cellular effects on cardiac vagal neurons of nucleus ambiguus, a key area for the autonomic control of heart rate. Urocortin 3 (1 nM-1000 nM) induced a concentration-dependent increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration that was blocked by the CRF(2) antagonist K41498. In the case of two consecutive treatments with urocortin 3, the second urocortin 3-induced Ca(2+) response was reduced, indicating receptor desensitization. The effect of urocortin 3 was abolished by pre-treatment with pertussis toxin and by inhibition of phospolipase C with U-73122. Urocortin 3 activated Ca(2+) influx via voltage-gated P/Q-type channels as well as Ca(2+) release from endoplasmic reticulum. Urocortin 3 promoted Ca(2+) release via inositol 1,4,5 trisphosphate receptors, but not ryanodine receptors. Our results indicate a novel Ca(2+) -mobilizing effect of urocortin 3 in vagal pre-ganglionic neurons of nucleus ambiguus, providing a cellular mechanism for a previously reported role for this peptide in parasympathetic cardiac regulation.

Functional Selective Oxytocin-derived Agonists Discriminate between Individual G Protein Family Subtypes

We used a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer biosensor to screen for functional selective ligands of the human oxytocin (OT) receptor. We demonstrated that OT promoted the direct engagement and activation of G(q) and all the G(i/o) subtypes at the OT receptor. Other peptidic analogues, chosen because of specific substitutions in key OT structural/functional residues, all showed biased activation of G protein subtypes. No ligand, except OT, activated G(oA) or G(oB), and, with only one exception, all of the peptides that activated G(q) also activated G(i2) and G(i3) but not G(i1), G(oA), or G(oB), indicating a strong bias toward these subunits. Two peptides (DNalOVT and atosiban) activated only G(i1) or G(i3), failed to recruit β-arrestins, and did not induce receptor internalization, providing the first clear examples of ligands differentiating individual G(i/o) family members. Both analogs inhibited cell proliferation, showing that a single G(i) subtype-mediated pathway is sufficient to prompt this physiological response. These analogs represent unique tools for examining the contribution of G(i/o) members in complex biological responses and open the way to the development of drugs with peculiar selectivity profiles. This is of particular relevance because OT has been shown to improve symptoms in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders characterized by abnormal social behaviors, such as autism. Functional selective ligands, activating a specific G protein signaling pathway, may possess a higher efficacy and specificity on OT-based therapeutics.

Quantification of Functional Selectivity at the Human α1A-Adrenoceptor

Although G protein-coupled receptors are often categorized in terms of their primary coupling to a given type of Gα protein subunit, it is now well established that many show promiscuous coupling and activate multiple signaling pathways. Furthermore, some agonists selectively activate signaling pathways by promoting interaction between distinct receptor conformational states and particular Gα subunits or alternative signaling proteins. We have tested the capacity of agonists to stimulate Ca(2+) release, cAMP accumulation, and changes in extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) at the human α(1A)-adrenoceptor. Signaling bias factors were determined by novel application of an operational model of agonism and compared with the reference endogenous agonist norepinephrine; values significantly different from 1.0 indicated an agonist that promoted receptor conformations distinct from that favored by norepinephrine. Oxymetazoline was a full agonist for ECAR and a partial agonist for Ca(2+) release (bias factor 8.2) but failed to stimulate cAMP production. Phenylephrine showed substantial bias toward ECAR versus Ca(2+) release or cAMP accumulation (bias factors 21 and 33, respectively) but did not display bias between Ca(2+) and cAMP pathways. Cirazoline and N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2-yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-yl]methanesulfonamide (A61603) displayed bias toward cAMP relative to Ca(2+) release (bias factors of 7.4 and 8.6). It is noteworthy that epinephrine, a second endogenous adrenoceptor agonist, did not display bias relative to norepinephrine. Our finding that phenylephrine displayed significant signaling bias, despite being highly similar in structure to epinephrine, indicates that subtle differences in agonist-receptor interaction can affect conformational changes in cytoplasmic domains and thereby modulate the repertoire of effector proteins that are activated.

Dual modulation of inward rectifier potassium currents in olfactory neuronal cells by promiscuous G protein coupling of the oxytocin receptor

Oxytocin receptor is a seven transmembrane receptor widely expressed in the CNS that triggers G(i) or G(q) protein-mediated signaling cascades leading to the regulation of a variety of neuroendocrine and cognitive functions. We decided to investigate whether and how the promiscuous receptor/G protein coupling affects neuronal excitability. As an experimental model, we used the immortalized gonadotropin-releasing hormone-positive GN11 cell line displaying the features of immature, migrating olfactory neurons. Using RT-PCR analysis, we detected the presence of oxytocin receptors whose stimulation by oxytocin led to the accumulation of inositol phosphates and to the inhibition of cell proliferation, and the expression of several inward rectifier (IR) K+ channel subtypes. Moreover, electrophysiological and pharmacological inspections using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings evidenced that in GN11 cells, IR channel subtypes are responsive to oxytocin. In particular, we found that: (i) peptide activation of receptor either inhibited or stimulated IR conductances, and (ii) IR current inhibition was mediated by a pertussis toxin-resistant G protein presumably of the G(q/11) subtype, and by phospholipase C, whereas IR current activation was achieved via receptor coupling to a pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i/o) protein. The findings suggest that neuronal excitability might be tuned by a single peptide receptor that mediates opposing effects on distinct K+ channels through the promiscuous coupling to different G proteins.

Neuroprotective potential of CB1 receptor agonists in an in vitro model of Huntington's disease

The therapeutic potential of cannabinoids in Huntington's disease (HD) has been investigated by several groups with complex and sometimes contrasting results. We sought to examine key points of intersection between cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB(1)) signalling, survival and the formation of mutant huntingtin aggregates in HD. Using a simplified pheochromocytoma (PC12) cell model of HD expressing exon 1 of wild-type or mutant huntingtin, we assayed cell death and aggregate formation using high-throughput cytotoxicity and image-based assays respectively. CB(1) activation by HU210 conferred a small but significant level of protection against mutant huntingtin-induced cell death. Pertussis toxin uncoupled HU210 from the inhibition of cAMP, preventing rescue of cell death. Phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) was also critical to CB(1)-mediated rescue. Conversely, treatments that elevated cAMP exacerbated mutant huntingtin-induced cell death. Despite opposing effects on HD cell survival, both HU210 and compounds that elevated cAMP increased the formation of mutant huntingtin aggregates. The increase in aggregation by HU210 was insensitive to Pertussis toxin and UO126, suggesting a G-protein alpha subtype s (G(s))-linked mechanism. We suggest that the CB(1) receptor, through G-protein alpha subtype i/o (G(i/o))-linked, ERK-dependent signal transduction, is a therapeutic target in HD. However the protective potential of CB(1) may be limited by promiscuous coupling to G(s), the stimulation of cAMP formation and increased aggregate formation. This may underpin the poor therapeutic efficacy of cannabinoids in more complex model systems and suggest that therapies that are selective for the G(i/o), ERK pathway may be of most benefit in HD.

Activation of Intracellular Signaling Pathways by the Murine Cytomegalovirus G Protein-Coupled Receptor M33 Occurs via PLC-β/PKC-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms

The presence of numerous G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) homologs within the herpesvirus genomes suggests an essential role for these genes in viral replication in the infected host. Such is the case for murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV), where deletion of the M33 GPCR or replacement of M33 with a signaling defective mutant has been shown to severely attenuate replication in vivo. In the present study we utilized a genetically altered version of M33 (termed R131A) in combination with pharmacological inhibitors to further characterize the mechanisms by which M33 activates downstream signaling pathways. This R131A mutant of M33 fails to support salivary gland replication in vivo and, as such, is an important tool that can be used to examine the signaling activities of M33. We show that M33 stimulates the transcription factor CREB via heterotrimeric G(q/11) proteins and not through promiscuous coupling of M33 to the G(s) pathway. Using inhibitors of signaling molecules downstream of G(q/11), we demonstrate that M33 stimulates CREB transcriptional activity in a phospholipase C-beta and protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent manner. Finally, utilizing wild-type and R131A versions of M33, we show that M33-mediated activation of other signaling nodes, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase family member p38alpha and transcription factor NF-kappaB, occurs in the absence of G(q/11) and PKC signaling. The results from the present study indicate that M33 utilizes multiple mechanisms to modulate intracellular signaling cascades and suggest that signaling through PLC-beta and PKC plays a central role in MCMV pathogenesis in vivo.

Mathematical modeling and application of genetic algorithm to parameter estimation in signal transduction: Trafficking and promiscuous coupling of G-protein coupled receptors

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute a large and diverse family of proteins whose primary function is to transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular signals. These receptors play a critical role in signal transduction, and are among the most important pharmacological drug targets. Upon binding of extracellular ligands, these receptor molecules couple to one or several subtypes of G-protein which reside at the intracellular side of the plasma membrane to trigger intracellular signaling events. The question of how GPCRs select and activate a single or multiple G-protein subtype(s) has been the topic of intense investigations. Evidence is also accumulating; however, that certain GPCRs can be internalized via lipid rafts and caveolae. In many cases, the mechanisms responsible for this still remain to be elucidated. In this work, we extend the mathematical model proposed by Chen et al. [Modelling of signalling via G-protein coupled receptors: pathway-dependent agonist potency and efficacy, Bull. Math. Biol. 65 (5) (2003) 933–958] to take into account internalization, recycling, degradation and synthesis of the receptors. In constructing the model, we assume that the receptors can exist in multiple conformational states allowing for a multiple effecter pathways. As data on kinetic reaction rates in the signalling processes measured in reliable in vivo and in vitro experiments is currently limited to a small number of known values. In this paper, we also apply a genetic algorithm (GA) to estimate the parameter values in our model.

Promiscuous coupling and involvement of protein kinase C and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 in the adenosine A1 receptor signalling in mammalian spermatozoa

Mammalian spermatozoa require a maturational event after ejaculation that allows them to acquire the capacity for fertilisation. This process occurs spontaneously during the transit through the female reproductive tract where spermatozoa are in contact with micromolar concentrations of adenosine that might act as a capacitative effector. This study shows that the adenosine A1 receptor agonist, 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine, can induce capacitation, i.e., the ability to undergo the acrosome reaction and to become fertile. This receptor, already known to be bound to Gαi2, is also bound to Gq/11. These G proteins are functional in the signalling pathway elicited by the A1 receptor and correlate with the multiple intracellular events that follow its activation. The use of protein kinase C isoform inhibitors and MEK inhibitors, resulting in the abolition of the biological response to the selective agonist, indicates the involvement of protein kinase C and MEK in its signalling. In agonist-treated spermatozoa an extracellular calcium influx, involvement of α and γ PKC isoforms and transient phosphorylation of ERK1/2 have been observed. Our results, besides showing that adenosine A1 receptor prompts mammalian spermatozoa to undergo the acrosome reaction hence supporting a role for adenosine as agent for fertilisation, show that 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine triggers signalling mechanisms that involve both Gαi2 and Gq/11, extracellular calcium influx, modulation of classical Ca2+-dependent PCK isoforms and up-regulation of the ERK1/2 phosphorylation.

Neuronal two‐pore‐domain potassium channels and their regulation by G protein‐coupled receptors

Leak potassium currents in the nervous system are often carried through two-pore-domain potassium (K2P) channels. These channels are regulated by a number of different G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pathways. The TASK subfamily of K2P channels are inhibited following activation of the G protein Galpha(q). The mechanism(s) that transduce this inhibition have yet to be established but there is evidence to support a role of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis products, depletion of PIP2 itself from the membrane, or a direct action of activated Galpha(q) on TASK channels. It seems possible that more than one pathway may act in parallel to transduce inhibition. By contrast, TRESK channels are stimulated following activation of Galpha(q). This is due to stimulation of the protein phosphatase, calcineurin, which dephosphorylates TRESK channels and enhances their activity. TREK channels are the most widely regulated of the K2P channel subfamilies being inhibited following activation of Galpha(q) and Galpha(s) but enhanced following activation of Galpha(i). The multiple pathways activated and the apparent promiscuous coupling of at least some K2P channel types to different G protein regulatory pathways suggests that the excitability of neurons that express K2P channels will be profoundly sensitive to variations in GPCR activity.

Role of nitric oxide/cyclic GMP and cyclic AMP in β3 adrenoceptor-chronotropic response

In this study we determine different signaling pathways involved in beta(3) adrenoceptor (beta(3)-AR) dependent frequency stimulation in isolated rodent atria. Promiscuous coupling between different G-proteins and beta(3)-AR could explain the multiple functional effects of beta(3)-AR stimulation. We examine the mechanisms and functional consequences of dual adenylate cyclase and guanylate cyclase pathways coupling to beta(3)-AR in isolated rodent atria. The beta(3)-AR selective agonists ZD 7114 and ICI 215001 stimulated in a dose-dependent manner the contraction frequency that significantly correlated with cyclic AMP (cAMP) accumulation. Inhibition of adenylate cyclase shifted the chronotropic effect to the right. On the other hand, the ZD 7114 activity on frequency was enhanced by the inhibition of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and soluble guanylate cyclase. This countervailing negative chronotropic nitric oxide-cyclic GMP (NO-cGMP) significantly correlated with the increase on NOS activity and cGMP accumulation. Current analysis showed a negative cross talk between cAMP chronotropic and NO-cGMP effects by inhibition of phospholipase C (PLC), calcium/calmodulin (CaM), protein kinase C (PKC), NOS isoforms and Gi-protein on the effects of beta(3)-AR stimulation. RT-PCR detected both eNOS and nNOS in isolated rat atria. NOS isoforms performed independently. Only nNOS participated in limiting the effect of beta(3)-AR stimulation. In eNOS-KO (eNOS-/-) mice the chronotropic effect of beta(3)-AR agonists did not differ from wild type (WT) mice atria, but it was increased by the inhibition of nNOS activity. Our results suggest that the increase in frequency by beta(3)-AR activation on isolated rodent atria is associated to a parallel increases in cAMP. The nNOS-cGMP pathway negatively modulates beta(3)-AR activation. Multiple signal transduction pathways between G-protein and beta(3)-AR may protect myocardium from catecholamine-induced cardiotoxic effects.