We consider results from two 27-year-long simulation pairs derived using two different ocean models. We focus on the Skagerrak/North Sea area. Each pair consists of the two terrain-following coordinate models ROMS and MIPOM. The first pair utilizes an eddy-permitting grid, that is, a grid in which the Rossby radius is barely resolved. The second pair utilizes an eddy-resolving grid in which the Rossby radius is truly resolved. The goal is to compare the quality of the two models and the two pairs. To this end we derive statistical properties such as probability density functions and compare them with similar statistics derived from observations. Thereby we obtain insight into whether a truly eddy-resolving model is required to realistically capture the mesoscale statistics. We find that eddy resolution is critical to get the mesoscale statistics correct, in particular, the strength of the current jets. Our results also indicate that the improvement gained by employing the eddy-resolving grid is mostly due to a better resolved topography. In particular, we find that this is the case in areas exhibiting prominent topographic features, such as the deep Norwegian Trench cutting into the heart of the northern North Sea/Skagerrak area. The results also highlight the advantage of first performing quality assurance investigations when implementing a new model for a new area.
Read full abstract