Prognostic Factor For Local Recurrence-free Survival Research Articles

Comparison of the prognostic factors of total en bloc spondylectomy and total piecemeal spondylectomy in patients with Enneking stage III giant cell tumor in the thoracic and lumbar spine

PurposeTo compare total en bloc spondylectomy with marginal margins against piecemeal spondylectomy with intralesional margins in the surgical treatment of Enneking stage III spinal giant cell tumor (GCT) in terms of local recurrence.MethodsA retrospective survival analysis of patients with Enneking stage III GCT who underwent TES with marginal margins or total piecemeal spondylectomy with intralesional margins was performed between January 2006 and April 2020. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was the time between the date of surgery and recurrence. Factors with p-values < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis using proportional hazard analysis.ResultsSixty patients (25 men and 35 women) with a mean age of 35.6 (range 11–71) years were included. The mean follow-up duration was 93 (range 24–198) months. Two patients were lost to follow-up 6 and 14 years after the procedure. Over a 10-year period, the recurrence rate was 13.3%. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year LRFS rates were 95%, 88%, and 78%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified total piecemeal spondylectomy and no adjuvant radiotherapy as prognostic factors for LRFS. Multivariate Cox‐regression models showed a significant association between local recurrence and total piecemeal spondylectomy and no adjuvant radiotherapy.ConclusionTES with marginal margins is better than total piecemeal spondylectomy with intralesional margins owing to its lower postoperative recurrence rate. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be administered to reduce postoperative recurrence rates.

Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Nonmetastatic Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma.

Head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignant tumor that is prone to local recurrence. The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers recommend that all patients with ACC receive postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). However, whether PORT can improve local control and which patients can benefit from PORT are unknown. This study aimed to assess the role of PORT and provide individualized suggestions for postoperative therapy in patients with ACC. We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonmetastatic head and neck ACC who underwent surgery with or without PORT. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to categorize the patients and predict local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). The survival outcome was compared between non-PORT and PORT groups. A total of 319 patients were included. PORT was identified as a prognostic factor for LRFS in univariate (P=.01) and multivariate analysis (P<.01). However, it did not improve distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival in univariate analysis. RPA categorized patients into 3 prognostic groups: low-risk (negative margin, T1-T2, primary location = major or minor salivary gland), intermediate-risk (negative margin, T1-T2, primary location = other locations instead of a major or minor salivary gland; negative margin, T3-T4; positive margin, without bone invasion), and high-risk (positive margin, with bone invasion). Significant LRFS improvements in the PORT group were observed among intermediate-risk (P<.01) and high-risk patients (P<.05). LRFS improvements among low-risk patients were relatively insignificant (P=.10). PORT was shown to be a positive prognostic factor for improved LRFS in ACC. Furthermore, PORT could significantly improve LRFS in intermediate-risk and high-risk patients with ACC, but whether low-risk patients could benefit from PORT needs further study.

Analysis of clinical efficacy, failure pattern and prognostic factors of comprehensive treatment for malignant mucosal melanoma of head and neck

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy, failure pattern and prognostic factors of the malignant mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) in a single center. Methods The treatment pattern, clinical efficacy, failure pattern and prognostic factors of 194 M0 MMHN patients admitted to our institution from 1982 to 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Results The 5-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 41.4%, 57.8%, 76.5% and 46.5%, respectively. The failure rate was calculated as 74.6%(141/189). Among them, 40%(56/141) had distant metastasis as the first pattern of treatment failure, 37%(52/141) had local relapse, 15%(21/141) had regional relapse, 5%(7/141) had concurrent distant metastasis and local/regional relapse and 3%(5/141) had concurrent local and regional relapse. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that surgical margins (P=0.001) and adjuvant radiotherapy (P=0.000) were the independent prognostic factors for LRFS. Conclusions Surgery combined with radiotherapy can yield relatively high LRFS in the comprehensive treatment of MMHN.Distant metastasis is the major failure pattern. Key words: Head neck neoplasmsm/radiotherapy; Melanoma/radiotherapy; Prognosis

HLA-A*02-B*46 haplotype: an adverse prognostic factor in Han patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Epidemiological studies have shown that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allelic polymorphisms are closely correlated to susceptibility to nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and in a previous study, we showed that HLA-B*46 and HLA-A*02-B*46 haplotypes were strongly associated with NPC susceptibility. In this retrospective study, we investigated the phenotype of the HLA-A and HLA-B alleles and haplotypes and correlated these data to the clinical and pathological parameters of NPC to understand the role of HLA alleles and haplotypes in NPC prognosis. The cohort comprised 117 NPC patients from a Han population in Xinjiang. The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis- free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The 5-year DMFS of the HLA-A*02-B*46 haplotype carriers and non-carriers was 66.4% and 90.3%, respectively. In addition, age was found to be a prognostic factor for LRFS, DFS, and OS (P=0.032, 0.040, and 0.013, respectively). We found that the HLA-A*02-B*46 haplotype might be a prognostic marker in addition to the traditional TNM staging in patients with NPC.

Cryoablation compared with radiofrequency ablation and microwave coagulation therapy for the local control of primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

286 Background: Although cryoablation (Cryo) has been advocated as an effective local treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), data are lacking regarding its outcomes in comparison with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave coagulation therapy (MCT). The aim of this study was to clarify the benefits and disadvantages of each modality for primary HCC. Methods: We reviewed outcomes of 120 patients with primary HCCs (&lt; 5cm) who underwent local treatment (Cryo: n = 55 and RFA/MCT: n = 65) between 1998 and 2011. The primary endpoint was local recurrence free survival (LRFS). The secondary endpoints were complication rates and the length of hospital stay. Results: Age, sex, Child-Pugh score, and background liver disease were identical between both groups. The Cryo group had larger tumors (mean ± standard error tumor size: Cryo 2.55 ± 0.75 cm vs. RFA/MCT 1.96 ± 0.72cm, p &lt; 0.001). The LRFS was higher in the Cryo group than in RFA/MCT group (2270.0 ± 240.8 days vs. 1940.7 ± 269.5 days: p = 0.116). The Cox proportional hazards multivariate analysis revealed that Cryo as the treatment of choice was an independent predictive indicator of improved LRFS (HR, 0.403 [95% CI: 0.202−0.807], P = 0.010). On the contrary, tumor size (for each 1 cm increase, HR, 1.635 [95% CI: 1.038–2.574], p = 0.034) and Child-Pugh score ≥ 6 (HR, 2.166 [95% CI: 1.179 – 3.979], p = 0.013) were negative prognostic factors for LRFS. Subgroup analysis showed that the LRFS for tumors ≤ 2 cm was similar between the 2 groups. However, if the tumor size was greater than 2 cm, the LRFS of the Cryo group was superior to RFA/MCT (2400.0 ± 287.4 days vs. 1177.9 ± 366.5 days: p = 0.004). The complication rates (Cryo 10.9% vs. RFA/MCT 10.8%: p = 0.980) and the length of hospital stay (9.45 ± 5.33 days vs. 9.52 ± 5.90 days: p = 0.947) were similar in both groups. No mortality was observed in the entire cohort. Conclusions: Cryo provides significantly higher chance of local control for primary HCCs compared with RFA/MCT, particularly if the tumor size exceeds 2 cm. Associated risks are at least equivalent to those of RFA/MCT even in patients with marginal to poor liver function. Cryo is a promising local ablative option in an era of rising incidence of HCC.