Profilin Actin Research Articles

A structural model of the profilin–formin pacemaker system for actin filament elongation

The formins constitute a large class of multi-domain polymerases that catalyze the localization and growth of unbranched actin filaments in cells from yeast to mammals. The conserved FH2 domains form dimers that bind actin at the barbed end of growing filaments and remain attached as new subunits are added. Profilin–actin is recruited and delivered to the barbed end by formin FH1 domains via the binding of profilin to interspersed tracts of poly-l-proline. We present a structural model showing that profilin–actin can bind the FH2 dimer at the barbed end stabilizing a state where profilin prevents its associated actin subunit from directly joining the barbed end. It is only with the dissociation of profilin from the polymerase that an actin subunit rotates and docks into its helical position, consistent with observations that under physiological conditions optimal elongation rates depend on the dissociation rate of profilin, independently of cellular concentrations of actin subunits.

Competition for delivery of profilin–actin to barbed ends limits the rate of formin-mediated actin filament elongation

Formins direct the elongation of unbranched actin filaments by binding their barbed ends and processively stepping onto incoming actin monomers to incorporate them into the filament. Binding of profilin to actin monomers creates profilin-actin complexes, which then bind polyproline tracts located in formin homology 1 (FH1) domains. Diffusion of these natively disordered domains enables direct delivery of profilin-actin to the barbed end, speeding the rate of filament elongation. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of coordinated actin delivery from the multiple polyproline tracts in formin FH1 domains. We found that each polyproline tract can efficiently mediate polymerization, but that all tracts do not generate the same rate of elongation. In WT FH1 domains, the multiple polyproline tracts compete to deliver profilin-actin to the barbed end. This competition ultimately limits the rate of formin-mediated elongation. We propose that intrinsic properties of the filament-binding FH2 domain tune the efficiency of FH1-mediated elongation by directly regulating the rate of monomer incorporation at the barbed end. A strong correlation between competitive FH1-mediated profilin-actin delivery and FH2-regulated gating of the barbed end effectively limits the elongation rate, thereby obviating the need for evolutionary optimization of FH1 domain sequences.

Supercell refinement: a cautionary tale.

Theoretically, crystals with supercells exist at a unique crossroads where they can be considered as either a large unit cell with closely spaced reflections in reciprocal space or a higher dimensional superspace with a modulation that is commensurate with the supercell. In the latter case, the structure would be defined as an average structure with functions representing a modulation to determine the atomic location in 3D space. Here, a model protein structure and simulated diffraction data were used to investigate the possibility of solving a real incommensurately modulated protein crystal using a supercell approximation. In this way, the answer was known and the refinement method could be tested. Firstly, an average structure was solved by using the `main' reflections, which represent the subset of the reflections that belong to the subcell and in general are more intense than the `satellite' reflections. The average structure was then expanded to create a supercell and refined using all of the reflections. Surprisingly, the refined solution did not match the expected solution, even though the statistics were excellent. Interestingly, the corresponding superspace group had multiple 3D daughter supercell space groups as possibilities, and it was one of the alternate daughter space groups that the refinement locked in on. The lessons learned here will be applied to a real incommensurately modulated profilin-actin crystal that has the same superspace group.

Structural Polymorphism of Actin

Information on the structural polymorphism of a protein is essential to understand the mechanisms of how it functions at an atomic level. Numerous studies on actin have accumulated substantial amounts of information about its polymorphism, and there are over 200 published atomic structures of different forms of actin using crystallography, fiber diffraction, and electron microscopy. To characterize all the reported structures, we proposed simple parameters based on the discrete rigid bodies within the actin molecule and identified four conformation groups by cluster analysis: the F-form in naked F-actin, the C-form in cofilactin, the O-form in profilin–actin, and the G-form in the majority of actin-containing crystal structures. The G-form group included the most variations, but each conformational variation was convertible via a thermal fluctuation, whereas the F- and C-forms were not accessible from the G-form. The convertibility and accessibility of the structures were evaluated using molecular dynamics simulations. Information about conformational conversion among each group is useful for understanding the mechanisms of actin function.

WH2 and proline‐rich domains of WASP‐family proteins collaborate to accelerate actin filament elongation

WASP‐family proteins are known to promote assembly of branched actin networks by stimulating the filament‐nucleating activity of the Arp2/3 complex. Here, we show that WASP‐family proteins also function as polymerases that accelerate elongation of uncapped actin filaments. When clustered on a surface, WASP‐family proteins can drive branched actin networks to grow much faster than they could by direct incorporation of soluble monomers. This polymerase activity arises from the coordinated action of two regulatory sequences: (i) a WASP homology 2 (WH2) domain that binds actin, and (ii) a proline‐rich sequence that binds profilin–actin complexes. In the absence of profilin, WH2 domains are sufficient to accelerate filament elongation, but in the presence of profilin, proline‐rich sequences are required to support polymerase activity by (i) bringing polymerization‐competent actin monomers in proximity to growing filament ends, and (ii) promoting shuttling of actin monomers from profilin–actin complexes onto nearby WH2 domains. Unoccupied WH2 domains transiently associate with free filament ends, preventing their growth and dynamically tethering the branched actin network to the WASP‐family proteins that create it. Collaboration between WH2 and proline‐rich sequences thus strikes a balance between filament growth and tethering. Our work expands the number of critical roles that WASP‐family proteins play in the assembly of branched actin networks to at least three: (i) promoting dendritic nucleation; (ii) linking actin networks to membranes; and (iii) accelerating filament elongation.

Tension modulates actin filament polymerization mediated by formin and profilin

Formins promote processive elongation of actin filaments for cytokinetic contractile rings and other cellular structures. In vivo, these structures are exposed to tension, but the effect of tension on these processes was unknown. Here we used single-molecule imaging to investigate the effects of tension on actin polymerization mediated by yeast formin Bni1p. Small forces on the filaments dramatically slowed formin-mediated polymerization in the absence of profilin, but resulted in faster polymerization in the presence of profilin. We propose that force shifts the conformational equilibrium of the end of a filament associated with formin homology 2 domains toward the closed state that precludes polymerization, but that profilin-actin associated with formin homology 1 domains reverses this effect. Thus, physical forces strongly influence actin assembly by formin Bni1p.

Structural Basis for Profilin-Mediated Actin Nucleotide Exchange

Actin is a ubiquitous eukaryotic protein that is responsible for cellular scaffolding, motility, and division. The ability of actin to form a helical filament is the driving force behind these cellular activities. Formation of a filament depends on the successful exchange of actin's ADP for ATP. Mammalian profilin is a small actin binding protein that catalyzes the exchange of nucleotide and facilitates the addition of an actin monomer to a growing filament. Here, crystal structures of profilin–actin have been determined to show an actively exchanging ATP. Structural analysis shows how the binding of profilin to the barbed end of actin causes a rotation of the small domain relative to the large domain. This conformational change is propagated to the ATP site and causes a shift in nucleotide loops, which in turn causes a repositioning of Ca2+ to its canonical position as the cleft closes around ATP. Reversal of the solvent exposure of Trp356 is also involved in cleft closure. In addition, secondary calcium binding sites were identified.

Modulation of actin structure and function by phosphorylation of Tyr-53 and profilin binding

On starvation, Dictyostelium cells aggregate to form multicellular fruiting bodies containing spores that germinate when transferred to nutrient-rich medium. This developmental cycle correlates with the extent of actin phosphorylation at Tyr-53 (pY53-actin), which is low in vegetative cells but high in viable mature spores. Here we describe high-resolution crystal structures of pY53-actin and unphosphorylated actin in complexes with gelsolin segment 1 and profilin. In the structure of pY53-actin, the phosphate group on Tyr-53 makes hydrogen-bonding interactions with residues of the DNase I-binding loop (D-loop) of actin, resulting in a more stable conformation of the D-loop than in the unphosphorylated structures. A more rigidly folded D-loop may explain some of the previously described properties of pY53-actin, including its increased critical concentration for polymerization, reduced rates of nucleation and pointed end elongation, and weak affinity for DNase I. We show here that phosphorylation of Tyr-53 inhibits subtilisin cleavage of the D-loop and reduces the rate of nucleotide exchange on actin. The structure of profilin-Dictyostelium-actin is strikingly similar to previously determined structures of profilin-beta-actin and profilin-alpha-actin. By comparing this representative set of profilin-actin structures with other structures of actin, we highlight the effects of profilin on the actin conformation. In the profilin-actin complexes, subdomains 1 and 3 of actin close around profilin, producing a 4.7 degrees rotation of the two major domains of actin relative to each other. As a result, the nucleotide cleft becomes moderately more open in the profilin-actin complex, probably explaining the stimulation of nucleotide exchange on actin by profilin.

Structural basis for the recruitment of profilin–actin complexes during filament elongation by Ena/VASP

Cells sustain high rates of actin filament elongation by maintaining a large pool of actin monomers above the critical concentration for polymerization. Profilin-actin complexes constitute the largest fraction of polymerization-competent actin monomers. Filament elongation factors such as Ena/VASP and formin catalyze the transition of profilin-actin from the cellular pool onto the barbed end of growing filaments. The molecular bases of this process are poorly understood. Here we present structural and energetic evidence for two consecutive steps of the elongation mechanism: the recruitment of profilin-actin by the last poly-Pro segment of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and the binding of profilin-actin simultaneously to this poly-Pro and to the G-actin-binding (GAB) domain of VASP. The actin monomer bound at the GAB domain is proposed to be in position to join the barbed end of the growing filament concurrently with the release of profilin.

Understanding the role of the G-actin-binding domain of Ena/VASP in actin assembly

The Ena/VASP and WASP family of proteins play distinct roles in actin cytoskeleton remodeling. Ena/VASP is linked to actin filament elongation, whereas WASP plays a role in filament nucleation and branching mediated by Arp2/3 complex. The molecular mechanisms controlling both processes are only emerging. Both Ena/VASP and WASP are multidomain proteins. They both present poly-Pro regions, which mediate the binding of profilin–actin, followed by G-actin-binding (GAB) domains of the WASP-homology 2 (WH2) type. However, the WH2 of Ena/VASP is somewhat different from that of WASP, and has been poorly characterized. Here we demonstrate that this WH2 binds profilin–actin with higher affinity than actin alone. The results are consistent with a model whereby allosteric modulation of affinity drives the transition of profilin–actin from the poly-Pro region to the WH2 and then to the barbed end of the filament during elongation. Therefore, the function of the WH2 in Ena/VASP appears to be to “process” profilin–actin for its incorporation at the barbed end of the growing filament. Conformational changes in the newly incorporated actin subunit, resulting either from nucleotide hydrolysis or from the G- to F-actin transition, may serve as a “sensor” for the processive stepping of Ena/VASP. Conserved domain architecture suggests that WASP may work similarly.

The regulation of mDia1 by autoinhibition and its release by Rho•GTP

Formins induce the nucleation and polymerisation of unbranched actin filaments via the formin-homology domains 1 and 2. Diaphanous-related formins (Drfs) are regulated by a RhoGTPase-binding domain situated in the amino-terminal (N-terminal) region and a carboxy-terminal Diaphanous-autoregulatory domain (DAD), whose interaction stabilises an autoinhibited inactive conformation. Binding of active Rho releases DAD and activates the catalytic activity of mDia. Here, we report on the interaction of DAD with the regulatory N-terminus of mDia1 (mDia(N)) and its release by Rho*GTP. We have defined the elements required for tight binding and solved the three-dimensional structure of a complex between an mDia(N) construct and DAD by X-ray crystallography. The core DAD region is an alpha-helical peptide, which binds in the most highly conserved region of mDia(N) using mainly hydrophobic interactions. The structure suggests a two-step mechanism for release of autoinhibition whereby Rho*GTP, although having a partially nonoverlapping binding site, displaces DAD by ionic repulsion and steric clashes. We show that Rho*GTP accelerates the dissociation of DAD from the mDia(N)*DAD complex.

Non-muscle actin filament elongation from complexes of profilin with nucleotide-free actin and divalent cation-free ATP-actin.

Using vertebrate cytoplasmic actin consisting of a mixture of beta and gamma isoforms, we previously characterized profilin and nucleotide binding to monomeric actin (Kinosian, H. J., et al. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 13176-13188) and F-actin barbed end elongation from profilin-actin (PA) (Kinosian, H. J., et al. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 6734-6743). Our initial calculations indicated that elongation of F-actin from PA was more energetically favorable than elongation of F-actin from monomeric actin; therefore, the overall actin elongation reaction scheme described by these two linked reactions appeared to be thermodynamically unbalanced. However, we hypothesized that the profilin-induced weakening of MgATP binding by actin reduces the negative free energy change for the formation of profilin-MgATP-actin from MgATP-actin. When this was taken into account, the overall reaction scheme was calculated to be thermodynamically balanced. In our present work, we test this hypothesis by measuring actin filament barbed end elongation of nucleotide-free actin (NF-A) and nucleotide-free profilin-actin (NF-PA). We find that the free energy change for elongation of F-actin by NF-PA is equal to that for elongation of F-actin from NF-A, indicating energetic balance of the linked reactions. In the absence of actin-bound divalent cation, profilin has very little effect on ATP binding to actin; analysis of elongation experiments with divalent cation-free ATP-actin and profilin yielded an approximately energetically balanced reaction scheme. Thus, the data in this present report support our earlier hypothesis.

Arabidopsis Capping Protein (AtCP) Is a Heterodimer That Regulates Assembly at the Barbed Ends of Actin Filaments

The precise regulation of actin filament polymerization and depolymerization is essential for many cellular processes and is choreographed by a multitude of actin-binding proteins (ABPs). In higher plants the number of well characterized ABPs is quite limited, and some evidence points to significant differences in the biochemical properties of apparently conserved proteins. Here we provide the first evidence for the existence and biochemical properties of a heterodimeric capping protein from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtCP). The purified recombinant protein binds to actin filament barbed ends with Kd values of 12-24 nM, as assayed both kinetically and at steady state. AtCP prevents the addition of profilin actin to barbed ends during a seeded elongation reaction and suppresses dilution-mediated depolymerization. It does not, however, sever actin filaments and does not have a preference for the source of actin. During assembly from Mg-ATP-actin monomers, AtCP eliminates the initial lag period for actin polymerization and increases the maximum rate of polymerization. Indeed, the efficiency of actin nucleation of 0.042 pointed ends created per AtCP polypeptide compares favorably with mouse CapZ, which has a maximal nucleation of 0.17 pointed ends per CapZ polypeptide. AtCP activity is not affected by calcium but is sensitive to phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate. We propose that AtCP is a major regulator of actin dynamics in plant cells that, together with abundant profilin, is responsible for maintaining a large pool of actin subunits and a surprisingly small population of F-actin.

A crucial role for profilin–actin in the intracellular motility of Listeria monocytogenes

We have examined the effect of covalently crosslinked profilin-actin (PxA), which closely matches the biochemical properties of ordinary profilin-actin and interferes with actin polymerization in vitro and in vivo, on Listeria monocytogenes motility. PxA caused a marked reduction in bacterial motility, which was accompanied by the detachment of bacterial tails. The effect of PxA was dependent on its binding to proline-rich sequences, as shown by the inability of PH133SxA, which cannot interact with such sequences, to impair Listeria motility. PxA did not alter the motility of a Listeria mutant that is unable to recruit Ena (Enabled)/VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) proteins and profilin to its surface. Finally, PxA did not block the initiation of actin-tail formation, indicating that profilin-actin is only required for the elongation of actin filaments at the bacterial surface. Our findings provide further evidence that profilin-actin is important for actin-based processes, and show that it has a key function in Listeria motility.

Capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by a high‐affinity profilin–actin complex

Capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by a high‐affinity profilin–actin complex

Crystallization and Structure Determination of Bovine Profilin at 2·0 Å Resolution

Profilin regulates the behavior of the eukaryotic microfilament system through its interaction with non-filamentous actin. It also binds several ligands, including poly(l-proline) and the membrane phospholipid phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2). Bovine profilin crystals (space group C2; a = 69·15 Å, b = 34·59 Å, c = 52·49 Å; α = γ = 90°, β = 92·56°) were grown from a mixture of poly(ethylene glycol) 400 and ammonium sulfate. X-ray diffraction data were collected on an imaging plate scanner at the DORIS storage ring (DESY, Hamburg), and were phased by molecular replacement, using a search model derived from the 2·55 Å structure of profilin complexed to β-actin. The refined model of bovine profilin has a crystallographic R -factor of 16·5% in the resolution range 6·0 to 2·0 Å and includes 128 water molecules, several of which form hydrogen bonds to stabilize unconventional turns.The structure of free bovine profilin is similar to that of bovine profilin to β-actin, and Cα atoms from the two structures superimpose with an r.m.s. deviation of 1·25 Å. This value is reduced to 0·51 Å by omitting Ala1 and the N-terminal acetyl group, which lie at a profilin—actin interface in crystals of the complex. These residues display a strained conformation in crystalline proflin—actin but may allow the formation of a hydrogen bond between the N-acetyl carbonyl group of profilin and the phenol hydroxyl group of Tyr188 in actin. Several other actin-binding rsidues of profilin show different side-chain rotomer conformations in the two structures. The polypeptide fold of bovine profilin is generally similar to those observed by NMR for profilin from other sources, although the N terminus of Acanthamoeba profilin isoform I lies in a distorted helix and the C-terminal helix is less tilted with respect to the strands in the central β-pleated sheet than is observed in bovine profilin.The majority of the aromatic residues in profilin are exposed to solvent and lie in either of two hydrophobic patches, neither of which takes part in an interface with actin. One of these patches is required for binding poly(l-proline) and contains an aromatic cluster comprising the highly conserved residues Trp3, Tyr6, Trp31 and Tyr139. In forming this cluster, Trp31 adopts a sterically strained rotamer conformation. This patch is surrounded by basic residues at the carboxyl terminus of profilin and at the turns connecting strand 1 to strand 2 and strand 6 to strand 7, providing a plausible binding site for micellar PtdIns(4,5)P2.