The motor vehicle code of New York State permits driven of fire engines, ambulances, pol~ce can and other emergency vehicles, when responding to emergencies, to sound a siren. When hearing a suen nearby, other motorists are mandated to pull over to the right edge of the road and stop. This must be done even when it is not known exactly where the emergency vehicle is (2). To achieve some insight as to whether or not other driven might well be using sirens, which may be part of their vehicle's antitheft device, to expedite their passage through congested traffic, an informal inquiry was conducted during the Fall-Winter of 1984-85 and 198788. On both occasions observations were made at the same road intersection in a large city in New York State: a three-lane north-bound street having a peak traffic volume of approximately 1900 commercial and private vehicles per hour and a two-lane west-bound street handling about 1200 vehicles per hour. Flow of traffic through the intersection was controlled by a signal light. During both periods a total of 43 'A-hr. convenience citings were conducted, on Monday through Friday, between the hours of 0800-0930 and 1700-1830. Note was made of the number of times a siren was sounded in the immediate vicinity of the intersection. While the problem of double counting was recognized, it was felt that the changing situation, the large number of vehicles involved, and the dispersion of the observation times, would minimize the probability of that happening. Two siren-sounding occurrences were noted in Fall-Winter of 1984-85 and seven in 198788. In none of these nine instances was an emergency vehicle on call, identifiable by a flashing whlte and red light, seen. The number of discrete soundings per occurrence was one, with a duration of about two to three seconds. In no case was it possible to identify the vehicle from which the sound was coming. However, in the rwo occurrences observed in 1984-85, a private vehicle was noted to use the opening in the traffic which resulted. In the other seven instances, drivers did not respond to the siren, and there was no alteration in the pattern of the vehicle flow. The results of this inquiry suggest, as the work of others such as McKelvie (1) and Trinkaus (3) have implied, that drivers' compliance with motor vehicle regulations may well be declining. First, there is what appears to be an increase in the use of sirens by drivers of nonemergency vehicles. And, second, there is seemingly a lessening of the rate of assent by drivers in yielding the right-of-way when they hear a siren. While this implies that there is some decay in adherence to motor vehicle regulations, with its explicit implication for motorists' safety, perhaps of more importance is the suggested implicit increase in the demise of overall concern for the well being of othen
Read full abstract