Pro Re Nata Group Research Articles

A real-world study of effectiveness of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab injection for treating retinal diseases in Thailand

BackgroundTo evaluate the effectiveness of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) in actual practice for treating patients with retinal diseases in Thailand.MethodsA prospective, multi-centre, observational study was conducted among eight hospitals in their ophthalmology outpatient departments. Participants consisted of patients who had previously not received any IVB or IVR treatment between 2013 and 2014. The primary outcome measurement was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the end of the follow-up period compared to baseline.ResultsThere were 1629 treatment-naïve patients for the pro re nata (PRN) treatment pattern and 226 treatment-naive patients for the three-injections (3Inj) treatment pattern. BCVA improvements were found in 35% of the PRN group and 47% of the 3Inj group; however, it was not clinically meaningful between the IVB and IVR groups (P-value = 0.568 for PRN, P-value = 0.103 for 3Inj). A multivariable logistic regression (using the propensity score) showed that positive factors associated with vision improvement for the PRN pattern were the number of drug injections, having retinal vein occlusion, and under 60 years of age, while good BCVA at baseline was a negative predictive factor. For the 3Inj pattern, under 60 years of age and baseline BCVA were statistically significant predictors. Nonetheless, diabetes mellitus (DM) without other comorbidities was a statistically significant predictor of low response to vision improvement compared to DM with other comorbidities.ConclusionsThis study was the first observational, prospective study to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of IVB and IVR in Thailand. The majority of participants who used IVB or IVR showed improvements in BCVA after treatment. Further evaluation such as long-term follow-ups and subsequent comparison of effectiveness between IVB and IVR should be investigated due to the limited sample of IVR patients.Trial registrationThai Clinical Trial Registry TCTR20141002001. Registered 02 October 2014 (retrospectively registered).

INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF AFLIBERCEPT IN PATIENTS WITH POLYPOIDAL CHOROIDAL VASCULOPATHY: A 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP.

To compare the 3-year follow-up results of intravitreal injections of aflibercept between fixed dosing (FD) regimen and a pro re nata (PRN) regimen after three initial monthly doses for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and to analyze factors influencing improvement in visual acuity. We retrospectively studied all treatment-naive patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy who were scheduled to receive intravitreal aflibercept injections FD or PRN after induction treatment between March 2013 and May 2014. Best-corrected visual acuity was evaluated before treatment and at 4, 12, 24, and 36 months after initial treatment. Factors that influence improvement in visual acuity were also investigated. Thirty-three eyes were assessed at the 3-year follow-up examination. Twenty-three eyes were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections every 2 months for at least 1 year after three initial monthly doses (FD group), and 10 eyes were treated PRN after loading doses (PRN group). In the FD group, during the follow-up period from 1 to 3 years, quarterly dosing with capped PRN or a treat and extend regimen were selected. The mean number of administered intravitreal aflibercept was 15.3 ± 4.6 in the FD group and 9.0 ± 8.9 in the PRN group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.004). Significant improvement of the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution values for best-corrected visual acuity was shown at 36 months, as compared to baseline values (P = 0.019). No significant difference in the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity between the two groups was observed at baseline or at 4, 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment (all P > 0.05), although there was a trend toward better results in the FD group. Multiple regression analysis showed that the FD group had better visual acuity at 36 months and greater improvement in visual acuity than the PRN group (P = 0.031 for both comparisons). Intravitreal aflibercept was effective in improving the vision of patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy, as evaluated at the 3-year follow-up. Fixed treatment might be an important factor influencing improvement in visual acuity.

Comparison of one and three initial monthly intravitreal ranibizumab injection in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.

To compare three initial monthly intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) injections followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing with one initial monthly IVR injections followed by PRN dosing for macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Forty-two eyes of 42 patients who had IVR injections for BRVO were retrospectively studied. Eighteen eyes received 1 initial IVR injection (1+PRN group) and 24 eyes received 3 monthly IVR injections (3+PRN). At 1, 3, 6 and 12mo; spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was performed. Central macular thickness (CMT), the integrity of the external limiting membrane (ELM), the presence of subretinal fluid, cyst size, the presence of inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) defect were determined. At baseline the mean CMT was 521.3±153.2 µm in the 3+PRN group while it was 438.1±162.4 µm in 1+PRN group. At the final visit, mean CMT was 278.3±87.8 µm in the 3+PRN group and 285.2±74.2 µm in the 1+PRN group (P=0.079). The changes in CMT over the entire study period were also comparable in both groups (243±160 µm in the 3+PRN group, and 152.9±175.3 µm in the 1+PRN group; P=0.090). At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.92±0.60 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) in the 3+PRN group, while it was 0.72±0.46 logMAR in the 1+PRN group. Final BCVA was 0.42±0.55 logMAR in the 3+PRN group and 0.38±0.50 logMAR in the 1+PRN group (P=0.979). Additionally, the BCVA changes from baseline to final visit were not significantly different (-0.50±0.45 logMAR in the 3+PRN group, and -0.33±0.39 logMAR in the 1+PRN group; P=0.255). No significant differences in the anatomical or functional results are found between 3+PRN and 1+PRN regimens in the patients receiving ranibizumab for ME secondary to BRVO. Intact IS/OS and baseline BCVA are good predictor of the visual gain, while baseline CMT is a good predictor of the anatomical gain.

The Treat-and-Extend Injection Regimen Versus Alternate Dosing Strategies in Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

To assess outcomes of the treat-and-extend (T&E) injection regimen for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) as compared to either a monthly or a pro re nata (PRN) treatment strategy. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies that compared the T&E regimen with either monthly or PRN dosing for treatment-naïve AMD were included. Trial eligibility, data extraction, and risk of bias were assessed according to Cochrane review methods. Estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Four eligible studies were identified, all using ranibizumab (total N= 940 eyes), including 2 randomized controlled trials comparing T&E to monthly and 2 retrospective reviews comparing T&E to PRN. No studies evaluating aflibercept were identified. Improvements in vision and central retinal thickness were similar between T&E and monthly at 12months, with a mean difference of -1.79 letters (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.70, 0.13) and 3.76μm (95% CI: -13.78, 21.30) in favor of monthly injections. In contrast, visual gains were higher in the T&E compared to the PRN group (difference of+6.18 letters, 95% CI: 3.28, 9.08). Fewer injections were required using the T&E regimen when compared to monthly (mean of -1.6 and -6.9 injections at 12 and 24months, respectively). A mean of 1.44 more injections was required for the T&E compared to PRN regimen at 12months; however, this was achieved with fewer visits. Despite the growing preference for the T&E regimen, there is limited head-to-head evidence comparing dosing strategies. The evidence available, however, suggests that at 12months, T&E is comparable to monthly and superior to PRN dosing for both efficacy and safety outcomes when using ranibizumab.

Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy for Macular Edema following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: 1 Initial Injection versus 3 Monthly Injections

Purpose: To compare the 12-month efficacy of 1 initial intravitreal injection of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing with that of 3 initial monthly injections followed by PRN dosing in patients with macular edema (ME) after central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods: Twenty-nine eyes received 1 initial injection (1+PRN group) and 20 received 3 monthly injections (3+PRN group). Results: At month 12, changes in logMAR visual acuity from baseline were -0.172 ± 0.372 and -0.142 ± 0.317 in the 1+PRN and 3+PRN groups, respectively; the difference was not significant (p = 0.769). The number of anti-VEGF injections administered in the 3+PRN group (5.9 ± 2.1) was significantly greater than that in the 1+PRN group (4.1 ± 2.8; p = 0.022). Conclusion: When used for ME after CRVO, a 1+PRN regimen achieved 12-month outcomes similar to those of a 3+PRN regimen with fewer injections.

Comparison of pro re nata versus Bimonthly Injection of Intravitreal Aflibercept for Typical Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose: The aim of this study was to clarify the 1-year outcomes of pro re nata (PRN) and bimonthly intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) for typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (tAMD) after the initial 3 monthly IVA. Methods: We conducted a prospective, interventional study. Fifty-eight treatment-naïve patients with tAMD were randomly assigned to the PRN (30 patients) or the bimonthly (28 patients) treatment group. Both groups initially received 3 monthly IVA. Visual acuity, central macular retinal thickness (CRT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT) were evaluated at 12 months. Subanalysis was performed to identify factors associated with the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Results: BCVA was significantly improved only in the bimonthly group at 12 months. CRT and CCT were significantly decreased in both groups. Subanalysis showed that the only factor associated with BCVA improvement at 12 months was the existence of pigment epithelial detachment at baseline. Conclusions: BCVA showed significant improvement only in the bimonthly group but not in the PRN group at 12 months.

RANIBIZUMAB FOR MACULAR EDEMA AFTER BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: One Initial Injection Versus Three Monthly Injections.

To compare the 12-month-efficacy of 1 initial intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) followed by pro re nata (PRN) dosing with that of three initial monthly IVR followed by PRN dosing in patients with macular edema (ME) after branch retinal vein occlusion. Prospective, interventional study. Of 81 eyes, 42 received 1 initial IVR injection (1+PRN group) and 39 eyes received 3 monthly IVRs (3+PRN). Pro re nata injections were performed when fovea exudative changes were evident. At Month 12, the visual acuity (VA) changes from baseline were -0.245 ± 0.227 and -0.287 ± 0.222, in the 1+PRN and 3+PRN groups, respectively; there were no significant difference between groups (P = 0.728). The stratified analysis showed that patients with better VA (baseline VA >20/40) had similar significant improvement in VA at Month 12 (P < 0.001) to that of those with poorer VA (≤20/40). Better VA at Month 12 was significantly associated with younger age, better baseline VA, and thinner baseline central foveal thickness (P = 0.003, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). Mean total number of IVR injections in the 1+PRN and 3+PRN groups were 3.8 ± 1.8 and 4.6 ± 1.4, respectively (P = 0.060). In both groups, shorter durations to the first PRN injection were associated with greater total PRN injection number (1+PRN, P = 0.006; 3+PRN; group, P < 0.001). In IVR treatment for ME after branch retinal vein occlusion, 1+PRN and 3+PRN regimens achieved similar 12-month functional outcomes. Patients with shorter durations to initial PRN injection may require more PRN treatments.

One-Year Outcomes of 1 + pro re nata versus 3 + pro re nata Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Purpose: We compared 1-year outcomes of 1 + pro re nata (PRN) versus 3 + PRN of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Forty-two eyes with naïve AMD received 3 + PRN IAI treatment and 47 eyes with naïve AMD received 1 + PRN IAI treatment. Visual acuity (VA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT) and number of administered IAIs during 12 months were compared. Results: VAs improved, and CRTs reduced significantly at any given month from baseline in both groups (p < 0.01, respectively). CCT reduced significantly at 3 months in the 3 + PRN group (p = 0.024) but not in the 1 + PRN group. The 1 + PRN group received fewer injections than the 3 + PRN group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Aflibercept leads to equivalent VA and morphologic retinal improvement without administering 3 injections.

Pro re Nata versus Bimonthly Regimen in Exudative AMD Treated with Aflibercept: 1-year Results

Purpose To compare pro re nata (PRN) and bimonthly intravitreal aflibercept injection protocols in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods This was a retrospective, observational, comparative study in 2 centers. All study patients presented with newly diagnosed nAMD and were treated as follows after an induction of 3 consecutive monthly loading doses: the bimonthly group was retreated every 2 months and followed up every 4 months while the PRN group was retreated in case of subretinal exudation or visual acuity decrease and followed up every month. A comprehensive ophthalmic examination was performed at each study visit. Results At 1 year, 34 eyes were analyzed. The 19 patients in the bimonthly group had a mean visual acuity improvement of +8.5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters whereas stabilization was observed in the PRN group (-0.47 ETDRS letters; p = 0.027). All patients in the bimonthly group had 4 follow-up visits and 7.5 injections whereas the mean number of follow-up visits in the PRN group (15 patients) was 7.8 with 7.6 injections. Conclusions Our study suggests that a fixed bimonthly aflibercept retreatment protocol may provide better visual results than a PRN protocol.

Ranibizumab 0.3 mg for Persistent Diabetic Macular Edema After Recent, Frequent, and Chronic Bevacizumab: The ROTATE Trial.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 0.3 mg ranibizumab (Lucentis; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in eyes with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME) after recent, chronic, and frequent bevacizumab (Avastin; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA). Open-label, prospective study of 0.3 mg ranibizumab for eyes with persistent DME after bevacizumab. Thirty eyes randomized to a sustained group or a pro re nata (PRN) dosing group. The mean change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to 1 year was +6.7 letters in the sustained group, +6.4 letters in the PRN group, and +6.5 letters overall. There was an overall mean reduction of 116 µm from baseline central subfield thickness at 1 year, with -92 µm and -127 µm decreases in the sustained and PRN groups, respectively. Adverse events included two deaths; one patient with multiple cardiopulmonary comorbidities, myocardial infarction, stroke, osteomyelitis; and mild posterior subcapsular cataracts in two eyes. Ranibizumab 0.3 mg demonstrated improved visual and anatomic outcomes in patients with persistent DME following bevacizumab. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016;47:1030-1037.].

Aflibercept in persistent neovascular AMD: comparison of different treatment strategies in switching therapy

PurposeTo evaluate the effects of aflibercept administered according to a pro re nata (PRN) or Fixed Regimen to patients with neovascular AMD and persistent intraretinal/subretinal fluid (IRF/SRF) despite three consecutive ranibizumab injections.MethodsPatients were switched to aflibercept injection (IVA) administered according to a PRN or to a fixed regimen for 1 year in two different retina centers. At baseline each patient underwent a complete ophthalmologic evaluation, including best-corrected visual acuity assessment (BCVA ETDRS chart), fluorescein, and indocyanine green angiography and OCT.ResultsEach group included 36 eyes. After 1 year the PRN group showed BCVA stabilization (63 vs 60 letters, P=0.33), whereas fixed regimen group showed significant BCVA improvement (68 vs 71, P=0.008). The median central retinal thickness decreased by 94 μm in the PRN (P=0.002) and by 148 μm in the fixed regimen group (P≤0.001). Complete IRF/SRF reabsorption was found in 58% of eyes in the PRN and in 42% of eyes in the fixed regimen group. At 1-year visit, the percentage of eyes with pigment epithelium detachment did not significantly decrease, but a height reduction was recorded in both groups. The median number of IVA was 3.5 in the PRN and 7 in the fixed regimen group.ConclusionThe switch to aflibercept with both treatment strategies enabled improvement in morphological parameters and stabilization of visual acuity. BCVA improvement and reduction in vision loss with reduction in retinal thickness, fluid and PED height was achieved with the fixed regimen in previously treated nAMD after 1 year.

Ranibizumab Treatment for Pigment Epithelial Detachment Secondary to Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Post Hoc Analysis of the HARBOR Study

To analyze the effect of baseline presence and height of pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs) on visual and anatomic outcomes at 24 months in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with ranibizumab. Post hoc analysis of HARBOR, a 24-month, phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, active treatment-controlled study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT00891735). One thousand ninety-seven patients with neovascular AMD. Intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg monthly or pro re nata (PRN) after 3 monthly loading doses. We evaluated the effect of presence and height of baseline PED on several outcomes at 24 months, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in PED height, resolution of PED, and number of injections in the PRN arms. Development of macular atrophy at month 24 by presence or absence of PED was evaluated. Five hundred ninety-eight (54.5%) patients showed PED at baseline. In the ranibizumab 0.5-mg PRN group, mean numbers of injections were similar for patients with PED present or absent at baseline (14.0 vs. 12.5). Mean BCVA gains from baseline to 24 months were seen in all treatment groups and were comparable in patients with or without PED at baseline treated with ranibizumab 0.5 mg monthly (PED present at baseline,+9.0 letters; PED absent at baseline,+11.3 letters), 0.5 mg PRN (present,+8.4; absent,+7.9), 2.0 mg monthly (present,+7.1; absent,+11.1), or 2.0 mg PRN (present,+7.2; absent,+8.8). When analyzed by baseline PED height, mean BCVA gains were demonstrated and comparable in all treatment groups at 24 months except for patients treated with ranibizumab 2.0 mg monthly in the extra-large group (PEDs ≥352 μm; mean BCVA change,-0.8 letters). At 24 months, 53.2% (0.5 mg monthly), 44.5% (0.5 mg PRN), 70.4% (2.0 mg monthly), and 57.3% (2.0 mg PRN) of patients showed complete resolution of PED. Ranibizumab 0.5 mg given monthly or PRN effectively treated PEDs in patients with neovascular AMD, and significant vision gains resulted regardless of PED status and height at baseline. In this analysis, there was no additional vision benefit with a higher dose of ranibizumab (2.0 mg).

A systematic review of as needed versus treat and extend ranibizumab or bevacizumab treatment regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PurposeTo evaluate the relative efficacy of as needed versus treat and extend regimen for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies that evaluated...

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg treat-and-extend regimen for diabetic macular oedema: the RETAIN study

AimsTo demonstrate non-inferiority of ranibizumab treat-and-extend (T&E) with/without laser to ranibizumab pro re nata (PRN) for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO).MethodsA 24-month single-masked study...

Monthly Versus As-Needed Ranibizumab Injections in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion: The SHORE Study

To compare pro re nata (PRN) and monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients stabilized by monthly injections. Randomized, open-label, vision-examiner masked, 15-month study. Subjects with macular edema secondary to branch or central RVO. Subjects received monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab for 7 months and those meeting stability criteria between months 7 and 14 were randomized (1:1) to PRN injections versus continued monthly injections. Non-randomized (NR) subjects (never met stability criteria) received monthly injections. The primary endpoint was the slope of change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between months 7 and 15. There was no significant difference in the slope of change in BCVA between months 7 and 15 in patients treated PRN versus those treated with monthly injections (P = 0.509). Mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline BCVA in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score at month 15 was 21.0 ± 14.1 in the PRN group (n = 82) versus 18.7 ± 14.1 in the monthly group (n = 80) and 14.5 ± 14.7 in NR subjects (n = 13). The percentage of subjects who achieved BCVA ≥ 20/40 at month 15 was 76.8% in the PRN group, 71.3% in the monthly group, and 46.2% in NR subjects. The mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline central subfield thickness was -247.8 ± 207.5 μm in the PRN group, -289.9 ± 177.2 μm in the monthly group, and -93.2 ± 225.2 μm in NR subjects. There were no significant differences in mean BCVA gains or central subfield thickness reductions at month 15 between the PRN and monthly injection groups (all > 0.05). After edema resolution from 7 or more monthly ranibizumab injections in RVO subjects, visual outcomes at month 15 were excellent and not significantly different in subjects treated PRN versus those who continued monthly injections.

Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection for Macular Edema Due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: Two-Year Results from the COPERNICUS Study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for the treatment of macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).Randomized, double-masked, phase 3 trial.A total of 188 patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO.Patients received IAI 2 mg (IAI 2Q4) (n = 114) or sham injections (n = 74) every 4 weeks up to week 24. During weeks 24 to 52, patients from both arms were evaluated monthly and received IAI as needed, or pro re nata (PRN) (IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN). During weeks 52 to 100, patients were evaluated at least quarterly and received IAI PRN.The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 24. This study reports week 100 results.The proportion of patients gaining ≥ 15 letters was 56.1% versus 12.3% (P<0.001) at week 24, 55.3% versus 30.1% (P<0.001) at week 52, and 49.1% versus 23.3% (P<0.001) at week 100 in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively. The mean change from baseline BCVA was also significantly higher in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN group compared with the sham + IAI PRN group at week 24 (+17.3 vs. -4.0 letters; P<0.001), week 52 (+16.2 vs. +3.8 letters; P<0.001), and week 100 (+13.0 vs. +1.5 letters; P<0.0001). The mean reduction from baseline in central retinal thickness was 457.2 versus 144.8 μm (P<0.001) at week 24, 413.0 versus 381.8 μm at week 52 (P = 0.546), and 390.0 versus 343.3 μm at week 100 (P = 0.366) in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively. The mean number (standard deviation) of PRN injections in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups was 2.7 ± 1.7 versus 3.9 ± 2.0 during weeks 24 to 52 and 3.3 ± 2.1 versus 2.9 ± 2.0 during weeks 52 to 100, respectively. The most frequent ocular serious adverse event from baseline to week 100 was vitreous hemorrhage (0.9% vs. 6.8% in the IAI 2Q4 + PRN and sham + IAI PRN groups, respectively).The visual and anatomic improvements after fixed dosing through week 24 and PRN dosing with monthly monitoring from weeks 24 to 52 were diminished after continued PRN dosing, with a reduced monitoring frequency from weeks 52 to 100.

DIFFERENT DOSING OF INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB FOR CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION BECAUSE OF PATHOLOGIC MYOPIA

To compare the visual outcomes and retreatment rate of single injection of intravitreal bevacizumab followed by pro re nata (PRN) treatment and three monthly injections of intravitreal bevacizumab followed by PRN treatment for myopic choroidal neovascularization. Thirty-one consecutive eyes of 31 patients with myopic choroidal neovascularization were retrospectively evaluated. Nineteen eyes were treated with a single injection + PRN and 12 eyes with 3 monthly injections + PRN. The best-corrected visual acuity 12 months after the initial injection, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution gain from baseline, recurrence rate, and number of injections were statistically compared. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) was 0.42 ± 0.31 in the single injection + PRN group and 0.47 ± 0.29 in the 3 monthly injections + PRN group (P = 0.64). The best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly at 3, 6, and 12 months in both groups (P < 0.05 at each time point). Mean logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution gain at 3, 6, and 12 months did not differ significantly between groups. The single injection + PRN group required significantly fewer intravitreal bevacizumab treatments (P = 0.005). The rate of recurrence and choroidal neovascularization persistence did not differ significantly between groups. Compared with 3 monthly injections followed by PRN, single injection followed by PRN for myopic choroidal neovascularization required fewer injections and produced a similar visual outcome over 12 months.