Primary Tumor Location Research Articles

Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Demographics, Resectability, Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Finnish Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (Subgroup Analysis of the RAXO Study).

The primary tumor location (PTL) is associated with the phenotype, metastatic sites, mutations, and outcomes of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, but this has mostly been studied according to sidedness (right vs. left sided). We studied right colon vs. left colon vs. rectal PTL in a real-life study population (n = 1080). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed multi-cross-sectionally with QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29, EQ-5D, and 15D. A chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used to compare the groups. The PTL was in the right colon in 310 patients (29%), the left colon in 396 patients (37%), and the rectum in 375 patients (35%). The PTL was associated with distinct differences in metastatic sites during the disease trajectory. The resectability, conversion, and resection rates were lowest in the right colon, followed by the rectum, and were highest in the left colon. Overall survival was shortest for right colon compared with left colon or rectal PTL (median 21 vs. 35 vs. 36 months), with the same trends after metastasectomy or systemic therapy only. PTL also remained statistically significant in a multivariable model. The distribution of symptoms varied according to PTL, especially between the right colon (with general symptoms of metastases) and rectal PTL (with sexual- and bowel-related symptoms). mCRC, according to PTL, behaves differently regarding metastatic sites, resectability of the metastases, outcomes of treatment, and HRQoL.

A prediction nomogram for perineural invasion in colorectal cancer patients: a retrospective study

BackgroundPerineural invasion (PNI), as the fifth recognized pathway for the spread and metastasis of colorectal cancer (CRC), has increasingly garnered widespread attention. The preoperative identification of whether colorectal cancer (CRC) patients exhibit PNI can assist clinical practitioners in enhancing preoperative decision-making, including determining the necessity of neoadjuvant therapy and the appropriateness of surgical resection. The primary objective of this study is to construct and validate a preoperative predictive model for assessing the risk of perineural invasion (PNI) in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC).Materials and methodsA total of 335 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) at a single medical center were subject to random allocation, with 221 individuals assigned to a training dataset and 114 to a validation dataset, maintaining a ratio of 2:1. Comprehensive preoperative clinical and pathological data were meticulously gathered for analysis. Initial exploration involved conducting univariate logistic regression analysis, with subsequent inclusion of variables demonstrating a significance level of p < 0.05 into the multivariate logistic regression analysis, aiming to ascertain independent predictive factors, all while maintaining a p-value threshold of less than 0.05. From the culmination of these factors, a nomogram was meticulously devised. Rigorous evaluation of this nomogram's precision and reliability encompassed Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curve assessment, and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA). The robustness and accuracy were further fortified through application of the bootstrap method, which entailed 1000 independent dataset samplings to perform discrimination and calibration procedures.ResultsThe results of multivariate logistic regression analysis unveiled independent risk factors for perineural invasion (PNI) in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). These factors included tumor histological differentiation (grade) (OR = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03–0.74, p = 0.02), primary tumor location (OR = 2.49, 95% CI = 1.21–5.12, p = 0.013), gross tumor type (OR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.22–0.81, p = 0.01), N staging in CT (OR = 3.44, 95% CI = 1.74–6.80, p < 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (OR = 3.13, 95% CI = 1.60–6.13, p = 0.001), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.08–3.96, p = 0.028).These findings formed the basis for constructing a predictive nomogram, which exhibited an impressive area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.772 (95% CI, 0.712–0.833). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test confirmed the model's excellent fit (p = 0.47), and the calibration curve demonstrated consistent performance. Furthermore, decision curve analysis (DCA) underscored a substantial net benefit across the risk range of 13% to 85%, reaffirming the nomogram's reliability through rigorous internal validation.ConclusionWe have formulated a highly reliable nomogram that provides valuable assistance to clinical practitioners in preoperatively assessing the likelihood of perineural invasion (PNI) among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This tool holds significant potential in offering guidance for treatment strategy formulation.

Proximal Humerus Reconstruction for Bone Sarcomas: A Critical Analysis.

» The proximal humerus is a common location for primary bone tumors, and the goal of surgical care is to obtain a negative margin resection and subsequent reconstruction of the proximal humerus to allow for shoulder function.» The current evidence supports the use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty over hemiarthroplasty when reconstructing the proximal humerus after resection of a bone sarcoma if the axillary nerve can be preserved.» There is a lack of high-quality data comparing allograft prosthetic composite (APC) with endoprosthetic reconstruction of the proximal humerus.» Reverse APC should be performed using an allograft with donor rotator cuff to allow for soft-tissue repair of the donor and host rotator cuff, leading to improvements in shoulder motion compared with an endoprosthesis.

Tumor location matters, next generation sequencing mutation profiling of left-sided, rectal, and right-sided colorectal tumors in 552 patients

Despite the introduction of new molecular classifications, advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is treated with chemotherapy supplemented with anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF targeted therapy. In this study, 552 CRC cases with different primary tumor locations (250 left side, 190 rectum, and 112 right side) were retrospectively analyzed by next generation sequencing for mutations in 50 genes. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 in left-sided tumors compared to right-sided tumors and BRAF in right-sided tumors compared to left-sided tumors. Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were not detected in 45% of patients with left-sided tumors and in 28.6% of patients with right-sided tumors. Liver metastases were more common in patients with left-sided tumors. Tumors on the right side were larger at diagnosis and had a higher grade (G3) than tumors on the left. Rectal tumors exhibit distinctive biological characteristics when compared to left-sided tumors, including a higher absence rate of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations (47.4% in rectal versus 42.8% in left-sided tumors). These rectal tumors are also unique in their primary metastasis site, which is predominantly the lungs, and they have varying mutation rates, particularly in genes such as BRAF, FBXW7, and TP53, that distinguish them from tumors found in other locations. Primary tumor location has implications for the potential treatment of CRC with anti-EGFR therapy.

Fluoropyrimidine type, patient age, tumour sidedness and mutation status as determinants of benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with EGFR monoclonal antibodies: individual patient data pooled analysis of randomised trials from the ARCAD database

BackgroundKRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are used as predictive biomarkers to select therapy with EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Other factors may be significant determinants of benefit.MethodsIndividual patient data from randomised trials with a head-to-head comparison between EGFR mAb versus no EGFR mAb (chemotherapy alone or best supportive care) in mCRC, across all lines of therapy, were pooled. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups. Treatment effects within the predefined KRAS biomarker subsets were estimated by adjusted hazard ratio (HRadj) and 95% confidence interval (CI). EGFR mAb efficacy was measured within the KRAS wild-type subgroup according to BRAF and NRAS mutation status. In both KRAS wild-type and mutant subgroups, additional factors that could impact EGFR mAb efficacy were explored including the type of chemotherapy, line of therapy, age, sex, tumour sidedness and site of metastasis.Results5675 patients from 8 studies were included, all with known mCRC KRAS mutation status. OS (HRadj 0.90, 95% CI 0.84–0.98, p = 0.01) and PFS benefit (HRadj 0.73, 95% CI 0.68–0.79, p < 0.001) from EGFR mAbs was observed in the KRAS wild-type group. PFS benefit was seen in patients treated with fluorouracil (HRadj 0.75, 95% CI 0.68–0.82) but not with capecitabine-containing regimens (HRadj 1.04, 95% CI 0.86–1.26) (pinteraction = 0.002). Sidedness also interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy, with survival benefit restricted to left-sided disease (pinteraction = 0.038). PFS benefits differed according to age, with benefits greater in those under 70 (pinteraction = 0.001). The survival benefit was not demonstrated in those patients with mutations found in the KRAS, NRAS or BRAF genes. The presence of liver metastases interacted with EGFR mAb efficacy in patients with KRAS mutant mCRC (pinteraction = 0.004).ConclusionThe benefit provided by EGFR mAbs in KRAS WT mCRC is associated with left-sided primary tumour location, younger patient age and absence of NRAS or BRAF mutations. Survival benefit is observed with fluorouracil but not capecitabine. Exploratory results support further research in KRAS mutant mCRC without liver metastases.

Survival outcome and prognostic factors for early-onset and late-onset metastatic colorectal cancer: a population based study from SEER database

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide and there has been a concerning increase in the incidence rate of colorectal cancer among individuals under the age of 50. This study compared the survival outcome between early-onset and late-onset metastatic colorectal cancer to find the differences and identify their prognostic factors. We obtained patient data from SEER database. Survival outcome was estimated using Kaplan–Meier survival curves and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted utilizing COX models to identify their independent prognostic factors. A total of 10,036 early-onset metastatic colorectal (EOCRC) cancer patients and 56,225 late-onset metastatic colorectal cancer (LOCRC) patients between 2010 and 2019 were included in this study. EOCRC has more survival benefits than LOCRC. Tumor primary location (p < 0.001), the location of metastasis (p < 0.001) and treatment modalities (p < 0.001) affect the survival outcomes between these two groups of patients. Female patients had better survival outcomes in EOCRC group (p < 0.001), but no difference was found in LOCRC group (p = 0.57). In conclusion, our study demonstrated that EOCRC patients have longer survival time than LOCRC patients. The sex differences in survival of metastatic colorectal cancer patients are associated with patients’ age. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the differences between metastatic EOCRC and LOCRC, and can help inform the development of more precise treatment guidelines to improve prognosis.

Survival and prognostic factors in pediatric osteosarcoma: A 5-year single-center experience in Central Java, Indonesia

Background The advent of chemotherapy with multimodal treatment has improved the survival rate of osteosarcoma. However, the survival rate of patients with osteosarcoma in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains lower than in high-income countries (HICs).&#x0D; Objective To assess prognostic factors associated with survival rate of pediatric patients with osteosarcoma in Moewardi Hospital, Surakarta.&#x0D; Methods This retrospective study was performed in pediatric osteosarcoma patients at Moewardi Hospital, Surakarta from 2018 to 2022. We described patients’ clinical presentations and assessed prognostic factors. Survival rate was calculated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Prognostic factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression methods. &#x0D; Results Of the 82 patients included in the study, 40 (48.8%) were male and 42 (51.2%) were female. Most subjects (75.6%) were diagnosed with osteosarcoma at the age of &gt;10 years, 45 patients (54.9%) had primary tumors in the femur, and 16 patients (19.5%) had limb salvage surgery. The mean event-free survival duration was 13.6 (95%CI 9.7 to 17.5) months. The mean duration of overall survival was 22.7 (95%CI 17.3 to 28.1) months, with a 44.1% survival probability. Type of surgery was a significant prognostic factor (P=0.018), with limb salvage having better survival probability (93.3%) than amputation (19.8%).&#x0D; Conclusion The overall survival rate of osteosarcoma patients at our center is still lower than in other regional centers. Limb salvage surgery was a significant prognostic factor for survival, while gender, location of primary tumor, histological subtype, and metastasis at the time of diagnosis were not.

Characterization of pediatric non-hematopoietic tumor metastases to the central nervous system: A single institution review.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases represent a small portion of pediatric CNS neoplasms and data surrounding this condition with high morbidity is scarce. Single institutional archival institutional pathology records between 1999 and 2022 were searched for patients over 21 years old and younger with CNS, dura, cranial nerve, CSF, or leptomeningeal metastases; 41 cases were identified. We documented primary tumor types and locations, metastasis locations, types of invasion (direct extension vs distant metastasis), times from imaging or pathologic diagnosis to CNS involvement, and outcomes. Distant metastasis was the most common mechanism of metastasis (n = 32, 78%). Interval times to CNS metastasis varied by both tumor type and primary tumor location. In this cohort, osteosarcoma portended the shortest survival following CNS metastasis. This study highlights the diverse mechanisms and locations of CNS involvement in pediatric CNS metastases and illuminates a need for varied monitoring strategies when considering primary tumor type and anatomic location.

Baseline ctDNA gene alterations as a biomarker of survival after panitumumab and chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Certain genetic alterations and right-sided primary tumor location are associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor (EGFR) treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The phase 3 PARADIGM trial (n = 802) demonstrated longer overall survival with first-line anti-EGFR (panitumumab) versus antivascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC with left-sided primary tumors. This prespecified exploratory biomarker analysis of PARADIGM (n = 733) evaluated the association between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) gene alterations and efficacy outcomes, focusing on a broad panel of gene alterations associated with resistance to EGFR inhibition, including KRAS, NRAS, PTEN and extracellular domain EGFR mutations, HER2 and MET amplifications, and ALK, RET and NTRK1 fusions. Overall survival was prolonged with panitumumab plus modified FOLFOX6 versus bevacizumab plus modified FOLFOX6 in patients with ctDNA that lacked gene alterations in the panel (that is, negative hyperselected; median in the overall population: 40.7 versus 34.4 months; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.92) but was similar or inferior with panitumumab in patients with ctDNA that contained any gene alteration in the panel (19.2 versus 22.2 months; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.53), regardless of tumor sidedness. Negative hyperselection using ctDNA may guide optimal treatment selection in patients with mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov registrations: NCT02394834 and NCT02394795 .

Triplet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: An AGEO multicenter real-world study

BackgroundPrior trials validated triplet chemotherapy (Tri-CT) with bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but real-world data are scarce and practices remain heterogeneous. AimsTo evaluate Tri-CT +/- bevacizumab efficacy and safety, and to identify factors influencing treatment decisions. MethodsThe COLOTRIP retrospective study enrolled mCRC patients treated from 2014 to 2019 in 14 French centers. ResultsOf 299 patients (81% PS 0-1, 58% RAS-mutated and 19% BRAF-mutated), 51% received Tri-CT and 49% Tri-CT + bevacizumab. Metastatic disease was classified as resectable (6.5%), potentially resectable (40%), and unresectable (54%). Bevacizumab use was associated with primary tumor location, mutational status and number of metastases. Median overall survival was 33.5 months in the Tri-CT group and 23.9 months in the Tri-CT + bevacizumab group, with median progression-free survival being 14.5 and 11.4 months. After adjusting for initial characteristics, no difference in survival was noted. Around 30% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events. ConclusionsThis study highlights several factors influencing Tri-CT use +/- bevacizumab decision and confirms the real-world good oncological outcomes and tolerability of these regimens in mCRC patients. Our results suggest that Tri-CT alone may by an appropriate option for specific subgroups of patients.

Clinical features and mutation analysis of class 1/2/3 BRAF mutation colorectal cancer.

BRAF (B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase)-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) still has poor prognostic. The efficacy of BRAF inhibitor is unpredictable just that intrinsic genetic complexity, immune microenvironment and partially unknown reason. Understanding the co-mutation mechanism can help improve treatment and follow-up strategies. We retrospectively analyzed 35 (BRAF-mutated/BRAF wild-type) Chinese CRC and 125 Western CRC who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS). Co-occurrence mutation analysis, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis was enabled in this study. Thirty-five (10.32%) patients were BRAF-mutated, with 17 patients were BRAF V600E in Beijing Hospital. Patients with BRAF mutation had significant association with high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H) (P=0.0004) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) (P=0.0003) than those with BRAF wild-type. In 125 BRAF-mutated Western CRC patients, the frequency of age at diagnosis, gender, sample type, Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM), MSI, TMB, and BRAF mutation type was consistent with Chinese data. However, the primary tumor location showed significant statistical differences (P<0.0001). Class 1 were more likely to occur in elder and female. Western cohort was consistent with above in Chinese cohort. Other clinicopathological features were not significantly associated with mutation type. However, Western cohort showed class 1 exhibited primary sample type predominance in both class 1 vs. others (P<0.05) and class 1 vs. class 3 (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the data showed TMB-H (57.69% vs. 11.76%, P<0.001) and MSI-H (28.21% vs. 0%, P<0.05) of the class 1 BRAF mutation proportion were significantly higher, compared with class 3 BRAF mutation. In concurrent oncogenic mutations, compared with non-class 1 BRAF mutation, class 1 are more likely to co-occur with passenger mutation. Data from Western populations showed similar results. We also found that the class 1 mutation was mutually exclusive with co-KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) mutation in CRC, and co-APC (APC regulator of WNT signaling pathway) mutation appeared more frequently in non-class 1 BRAF mutation. KEGG pathway showed that fewer proto-cancer signaling pathways were enriched in the class 1, which further confirmed that this type had stronger tumorigenicity. GO enrichment also proved that class 1 had stronger tumorigenicity. Finally, prognostic analysis showed median overall survival (mOS) of 19.43 months in class 1 vs. 47.57 months in non-class 1 (P=0.0002). Further study showed that the mOS of class 1, class 2, class 3 and class NA (unknown) was 19.43, 28.50, 47.57 months and not reached (P=0.0001), respectively. This study showed class 1/non-class 1 BRAF mutation in CRC had significantly differences in co-mutation features, genomic markers and prognostic. Understanding BRAF mutation types and co-mutation mechanism will contribute to accurately grasping treatment and follow-up strategies and promoting the development of precision therapy for CRC in the future.

Neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive tumor with poor prognosis and rising incidence globally. Multimodal therapy that includes surgical resection and chemotherapy with or without radiation offers the best chance for optimal outcomes. The development of established criteria for anatomic staging of local primary tumors into potentially resectable (PR), borderline resectable (BR), and locally advanced (LA) has greatly clarified the optimal treatment strategies. While upfront surgical resection was traditionally the recommended approach for localized PDAC, increasingly neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is recommended prior to surgery. Whereas NT can lead to downstaging that facilitates surgical resection for BR/LA cancers, NT also enhances patient selection for surgery, improves margin-negative resection rates, and increases the odds of completing multimodality therapy for all patients with PDAC. Herein, we review the rationale for NT for localized PDAC and summarize existing and ongoing literature.

Survival of patients with unfavorable prognosis cutaneous melanoma with increased use of immunotherapy agents: apopulation-based study in Belgium.

Although metastatic cutaneous melanoma is associated with an unfavorable prognosis, innovative therapies including immunomodulating agents and targeted therapies have shown survival benefits in clinical trials. We assessed the impact of the introduction of innovative drugs into clinical practice on the survival of patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma during the period 2004-2017, in Belgium. The evolution of associated expenses was also analyzed. This is a retrospective population-based study using data from the national Belgian Cancer Registry, compulsory health insurance, and administrative survival data. The immunomodulating drugs were ipilimumab, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, while targeted therapies included vemurafenib, dabrafenib and trametinib. We did not identify a trend for improvement over time. Median survival (years) was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-1.8) in 2004-2008, 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8-1.5) in 2009-2013, and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.3-2.4) in 2014-2017, respectively. In contrast, survival improved in those with unknown primary tumor localization. In this group, median survival time was 2.0 (95% CI: 1.4-2.9) in the most recent period, while it was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7-1.3) in 2009-2013, and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.2) in 2004-2008. The uptake of innovative drugs remained modest, with no drug being used by more than 30% of patients. Yearly expenditure was almost non-existent, and gradually increased, reaching several million euros in 2014-2017. Patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2017 showed no apparent improvement in survival. In contrast, increased survival was observed in the subgroup of patients with unknown primary tumor localization.

The Use of Gene Expression Profiling and Biomarkers in Melanoma Diagnosis and Predicting Recurrence: Implications for Surveillance and Treatment

Cutaneous melanoma is becoming more prevalent in the United States and has the highest mortality among cutaneous malignancies. The majority of melanomas are diagnosed at an early stage and, as such, survival is generally favorable. However, there remains prognostic uncertainty among subsets of early- and intermediate-stage melanoma patients, some of whom go on to develop advanced disease while others remain disease-free. Melanoma gene expression profiling (GEP) has evolved with the notion to help bridge this gap and identify higher- or lower-risk patients to better tailor treatment and surveillance protocols. These tests seek to prognosticate melanomas independently of established AJCC 8 cancer staging and clinicopathologic features (sex, age, primary tumor location, thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, lymphovascular invasion, microsatellites, and/or SLNB status). While there is a significant opportunity to improve the accuracy of melanoma prognostication and diagnosis, it is equally important to understand the current landscape of molecular profiling for melanoma treatment. Society guidelines currently do not recommend molecular testing outside of clinical trials for melanoma clinical decision making, citing insufficient high-quality evidence guiding indications for the testing and interpretation of results. The goal of this chapter is to review the available literature for GEP testing for melanoma diagnosis and prognostication and understand their place in current treatment paradigms.

The significance of surveillance imaging in children with Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma

Primary bone tumors in children and adolescents, while rare, pose significant challenges in diagnosis and management. Children treated for Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma are offered a 5-year follow-up program after end of treatment, including radiological surveillance of primary location of tumor and the lungs. There is no consensus regarding how often and how the children should be followed with radiological imaging. This retrospective descriptive study of 69 patients (34 with Ewing sarcoma and 35 with osteosarcoma) investigated the consequences of abnormal findings in 1279 follow-up images. Nine relapses were detected, 4 in the Ewing group (3 local and 1 pulmonary) and 5 in the osteosarcoma group (1 local and 4 pulmonary). Of these, only two patients exhibited symptomatic relapses, with the remainder identified through imaging. The positive predictive value for relapse detection was 0.44 in the Ewing group, and 0.5 in the osteosarcoma group. In the Ewing sarcoma patient image follow-up program, the probability of anomaly detection was 12% (95% CI, 10–15). For osteosarcoma patients, the likelihood was 6% (95% CI, 4–8). Our data indicates that abnormal findings on follow-up images rarely represents relapse of tumor. As the surveillance protocol differs between the patient groups, wherein Ewing sarcoma patients primarily are monitored through MRI while osteosarcoma patients are predominantly tracked via X-rays, there is an increased occurrence of incidental findings in the first group. However, it is imperative to interpret imaging data in conjunction with clinical information, avoiding isolated reliance on imaging results when making treatment decisions.

Clinical management of NUT carcinoma (NC) in Germany: Analysis of survival, therapy response, tumor markers and tumor genome sequencing in 35 adult patients

NUT carcinomas (NC) are very rare and highly aggressive tumors, molecularly defined by an aberrant gene fusion involving the NUTM1 gene. NCs preferentially arise intrathoracically or in the head and neck region, having a highly adverse prognosis with almost no long-term survivors.Here, we report on a cohort of 35 adult NC patients who were evaluated at University Hospital Tuebingen in an eight year time span, i.e. between 2016 and 2023. Primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and influence of primary tumor locations, fusion gene types and staging on OS. Secondary objectives were patient baseline characteristics, risk factors, tumor markers, treatment decisions and responses to therapy comparing thoracic vs non-thoracic origins. Further, data from tumor genome sequencing were analyzed.In this monocentric German cohort, 54 % of patients had thoracic tumors and 65 % harbored a BRD4-NUTM1 fusion gene. Median OS was 7.5 months, being significantly dependent on primary tumor location and nodal status. Initial misdiagnosis was a problem in 31 % of the cases. Surgery was the first treatment in most patients (46 %) and 80 % were treated with polychemotherapies, showing longer progression free survival (PFS) with ifosfamide-based than with platinum-based regimens. Patients treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in addition to first-line chemotherapy tended to have longer OS. Initial LDH levels could be identified as a prognostic measure for survival prognosis. Sequencing data highlight aberrant NUTM1 fusion genes as unique tumor driver genes.This is the largest adult European cohort of this orphan tumor disease, showing epidemiologic and molecular features as well as relevant clinical data. Awareness to prevent misdiagnosis, fast contact to a specialized nation-wide center and referral to clinical studies are essential as long-term survival is rarely achieved with any of the current therapeutic regimes.

Incidence and centralization of chordoma in the Netherlands: A nationwide study between 1991 and 2020

IntroductionChordomas are rare malignant bone tumors arising in the axial skeleton, with an incidence of 0.3–0.88 per million inhabitants. We studied the annual incidence rate and centralization of treatment for chordoma in the Netherlands. MethodsWe retrieved pathology excerpts from the PALGA nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry between 1991 and 2019 for patients with a chordoma to calculate incidence rates. From pathology reports we extracted patient age at diagnosis, sex, year of diagnosis, localization of primary tumor, histologic chordoma subtype (conventional including chondroid, poorly differentiated or dedifferentiated), center of diagnosis (bone tumor referral center (BTC) or other hospital), and partial identification of the BTCs. ResultsA total of 420 individual chordoma patients were identified in the given time period. The incidence of chordoma increased from 0.593 per million inhabitants between 1991–1995 to 1.111 from 2015–2019 (P = 0.001). Median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 1–95), 252 patients (60%) were male. The proportion of samples analyzed in a BTC either primarily or secondary, as a consultation, revision or referral, increased significantly from 29.3% to 84.4% (P < 0.001). Most primary and secondary samples were analyzed at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC, 54.4% and 57% respectively). ConclusionsThis study shows an increase in the standardized incidence of pathology proven chordoma in the Netherlands. We observed an increase in samples being analysed in the specialized BTCs as well, which is in line with current guidelines and will hopefully lead to more accurate diagnoses and optimal treatment plans for chordoma patients in specialized treatment centers.

Retracted: Clinicopathological Features of 166 Cases of Invasive Ductal Breast Carcinoma and Effect of Primary Tumor Location on Prognosis after Modified Radical Mastectomy.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/3158956.].

The TGF-beta pathway alterations in young-onset colorectal cancer.

218 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The epidemiological evidence suggests an increased incidence of young-onset CRC, defined as the CRC in individuals 50 years old or younger. The TGF-beta alterations are among the pivotal events in the CRC carcinogenesis. However, the rate of mutations leading to TGF-beta alterations are yet to be defined in young-onset CRC. Therefore, we conducted a bioinformatics analysis of the mutations associated with TGF-pathway alterations according to age (≤50 years of age vs. &gt;50 years) and primary tumor location (colon vs. rectum). Methods: We used published genomic data of 6286 patients with CRC from the 16 CRC datasets included in the cBioPortal database. The presence of mutations in the following genes was used to define TGF-beta alterations: TGFBR2, TGFB2, TGFBRAP1, TGFBR1, TGFBR3, TGFB1I1, TGFBI, TGFB1, TGFBR3L, TGFB3, TGFA, SMAD1-9, BMPR2, BMPER, BMP3, BMP2K, BMP1, BMP5, BMP10, BMPR1A, BMP15, BMP7, BMP23, BMP4, BMP6, BMPR1B, BMP8B, BMP8A. The presence of TGF-beta alterations according to the age (≤50 years of age vs. &gt;50 years) were evaluated with Chi-square tests. The association between primary tumor distribution (colon vs. rectal) and age were evaluated across patients with and without TGF-beta pathway alterations. The effect of WNT pathway alterations on the overall survival and survival after the metastatic stage was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier survival curves. A type-I error level of 5% (p&lt;0.05) was considered the threshold limit for statistical significance. Results: A total of 2280 patients with available age data was included in the analyses.The mutations associated with TGF-beta pathway alterations was more common &gt;50 years of age compared to ≤50 years of age. (28% vs. 17.4%, p&lt;0.001). Additionally, mutations associated with TGF-beta pathway alterations were more frequent in colon cancer compared to rectum (25.4% vs. 18.7, p&lt;0.001). While progression-free survival was higher in patients with mutations associated with TGF-beta pathway alterations (12.5 vs. 10.7 months, p=0.012), the overall survival (59.6 vs. 58.9 months, p=0.896) and survival after metastatic stage (49.7 vs. 56.5 months, p=0.109) were similar across two groups. Conclusions: In this study, we observed a higher rate of mutations associated with TGF-beta pathway alterations in older CRC patients compared to patients with young-onset CRC. Furthermore, the mutations associated with TGF-beta pathway alterations were more frequent in colon primaries. The overall survival was independent of these mutations. Further research is required to delineate the association between TGF-beta pathway alterations and onset of CRC, as well as the CRC prognosis.

The implication of failure patterns after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with small involved-field in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

376 Background: In this study, we aimed to analyze failure patterns, the clinical and biological prognostic factors for treatment outcomes, and evaluate the feasibility of involved-field irradiation (IFI) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 511 patients diagnosed with ESCC and underwent neoadjuvant CCRT and radical esophagectomy between January 2016 and February 2022 at Samsung Medical Center. For IFI, the clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as the primary gross tumor volume (GTV) plus a 2.0-3.0 cm longitudinal margin and a 0.5-1.0 cm circumferential margin, as well as the GTV of lymph nodes (LN) plus a 0.5-1.0 cm margin. For elective nodal irradiation (ENI), the CTV encompassed supraclavicular, mediastinal, or abdominal LN regions based on the primary tumor location. IFI was applied in most cases (98%). The failure patterns, loco-regional control (LRC), and survival outcome were analyzed. Regional lymph nodes (LNs) were defined and classified according to the AJCC 8th edition. Non-regional LNs were defined as metastatic LNs in neck, thorax, abdominal area except regional LNs. Results: With a median follow-up of 44.4 months, 213 (41.7%) patients experienced recurrence. The first recurrent sites were locoregional (LR) in 98 patients (19.2%), non-regional LN in 81 (15.9%), and distant organs in 152 (29.7%). Among the 98 patients with LR recurrence, RT in-field failure occurred in 53 (10.4%) patients, in &amp; out-field failure in 18 (3.5%), and out-field failure in 27 (5.3%). In 27 cases of out-field failure only, LR recurrent lesion could be included in the target volume in 7 (1.4%) cases if ENIs were applied. Among the 27 patients, 10 received salvage treatment and 2 did not experience further recurrence. The analysis for the detailed LN recurrence showed that the upper mediastinal and supraclavicular LNs were the most frequent area, regardless of the primary tumor location and other clinical factors. Among 213 recurrent cases, 54 (10.5%) recurred in upper paratracheal LN and 40 (7.8%) in supraclavicular LN. The 5-year LRC rates, disease-control rates, and overall survival (OS) rates were 77.5%, 53%, and 54.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that gender, age, cStage, ypStage, and resection margin status were independent prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant CCRT using IFI with a small margin showed favorable treatment outcomes and out-field recurrence that the traditional ENI field could cover accounted for a small portion; thus, it might be feasible in the neoadjuvant setting. However, we need to consider that the upper mediastinal and supraclavicular areas were the most frequent recurrence sites.