Primary Endpoint In Part Research Articles

REZILIENT3: Phase 3 study of zipalertinib plus chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated, advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) mutations.

TPS219 Background: Despite recent advances, tolerable and effective treatments for patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations are needed, particularly in the first-line setting where platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care. Zipalertinib (CLN-081/TAS6417), an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) of EGFR with broad activity against EGFR mutations, showed encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with EGFR ex20ins–mutant NSCLC, leading to ‘Breakthrough Therapy’ designation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in January 2022. Data suggest that combining EGFR TKIs with chemotherapy can improve antitumor efficacy versus chemotherapy or TKI treatment alone in patients with EGFR-mutated nonsquamous NSCLC. REZILIENT3 is a pivotal phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of zipalertinib plus first-line standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in previously untreated patients with nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations. Methods: This randomized, controlled, open-label, phase 3 study (NCT05973773) will be conducted in two parts. Part A (safety lead-in) will confirm the safety of zipalertinib 100 mg twice daily as the recommended dose in combination with chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations or other uncommon single/compound EGFR mutations. In Part B (randomized part), patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations and at least one measurable lesion (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1) will be randomized 1:1 to zipalertinib plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0/1), brain metastases (yes/no), and geography (Asia/rest of world). Zipalertinib will be administered orally at a starting dose of 100 mg twice daily (pending confirmation in Part A). Chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m² plus cisplatin 75 mg/m² or carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/mL/min) will be administered intravenously on Day 1 of each cycle (carboplatin/cisplatin for four cycles). Patients randomized to chemotherapy alone will be allowed to cross over to zipalertinib monotherapy after documented progressive disease. The primary endpoint in Part B is progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, safety, intracranial efficacy endpoints, and quality of life. Part A is anticipated to enroll between 6 and 12 patients, while Part B is estimated to enroll approximately 260 patients. Enrollment started in June 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05973773 .

Study protocol for a prospective, multicentre study of hypercortisolism in patients with difficult-to-control type 2 diabetes (CATALYST): prevalence and treatment with mifepristone

IntroductionEven with recent treatment advances, type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains poorly controlled for many patients, despite the best efforts to adhere to therapies and lifestyle modifications. Although estimates vary, studies...

BELLWAVE-010: A phase 3 study of nemtabrutinib plus venetoclax versus venetoclax plus rituximab (VR) in previously treated patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL).

TPS7089 Background: VR is a standard of care option for pts with CLL/SLL who have relapsed after ≥1 line of prior therapy. However, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments. Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of CLL. Nemtabrutinib is a BTK inhibitor that targets both wild type and C481-mutant forms of BTK. In the ongoing BELLWAVE-001 study, nemtabrutinib demonstrated manageable safety and durable antitumor activity in pts with R/R CLL/SLL with and without C481 mutations. The randomized, open-label, phase 3 BELLWAVE-010 study (NCT05947851) is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax versus VR as second-line or later treatment for pts with R/R CLL/SLL. Methods: Eligible pts are aged ≥18 years with active R/R CLL/SLL after ≥1 prior therapy per iwCLL 2018 criteria and an ECOG PS of 0-2. Approximately 720 pts will be enrolled in 2 parts. Part 1 is an open-label, nonrandomized dose escalation and confirmation phase to evaluate safety and determine the optimal dose of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax. Part 1 will enroll 30 pts to establish the dose of nemtabrutinib using a modified toxicity probability interval design. Pts will receive nemtabrutinib at 2 dose levels (45 mg PO QD starting dose, escalating to 65 mg PO QD) for 28 days, followed by nemtabrutinib + venetoclax (20-400 mg PO QD ramp up over 4 weeks). Part 2 is an open-label, parallel-group, randomized phase comparing the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax with VR. In part 2, approximately 690 pts will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either nemtabrutinib at the recommended dose for 28 days followed by the nemtabrutinib + venetoclax or venetoclax + rituximab (or rituximab biosimilar; 375 mg/m2 at week 6, followed by 500 mg/m2 every 4 weeks starting at week 10 until week 26 [total 6 doses]). Study treatment will continue for approximately 2 years or until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or other discontinuation criteria are met. Randomization will be stratified by BTK-C481 mutation status (detected vs not detected), geographic region (US/Canada vs Europe vs rest of world) and risk (high risk [del(17p) and/or TP53-mutated and/or IGHV-unmutated] vs low risk [absence of high-risk factors]). The primary end point for part 2 is progression-free survival by blinded independent central review (BICR) per iwCLL 2018 criteria. Secondary end points for part 2 are undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow at month 14 by central laboratory assessment, objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response by BICR per iwCLL 2018 criteria, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory end points are ORR including partial response with lymphocytosis, pharmacokinetics, and health-related quality of life. Recruitment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05947851 .

Abstract PO5-05-03: Phase 1/2 Dose Expansion Study Evaluating First-In-Class eIF4A Inhibitor Zotatifin in Patients with ER+ Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract Background Zotatifin (eFT226) is a first-in-class, potent and sequence selective inhibitor of RNA helicase eIF4A that promotes a stable mRNA:eIF4A:drug ternary complex at specific polypurine motifs present within the 5’-UTR of select transcripts, thereby blocking production of the encoded proteins. In preclinical models zotatifin treatment simultaneously down-regulated translation of numerous oncogenes including CDK4, ERα, ERBB2, KRAS, and CCND1. Previous clinical research has demonstrated the activity of zotatifin in combination with other agents in ER+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods Part 1 is a 3+3 dose escalation portion of the protocol followed by Part 2 as a Simon’s two-stage design in patients with ER+ MBC enrolled at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of zotatifin (0.07 mg/kg IV two weeks on/one week off) in combination with fulvestrant (ful) and abemaciclib (abema) (Z+F+A). Part 1a and Part 1b are 3+3 dose escalation portions evaluating zotatifin in combination with ful (Z+F) at QW IV and Q2W IV dosing schedules, respectively. Key eligibility criteria included at least one line of therapy for advanced/metastatic disease, progression on hormone therapy, and in addition, the Z+F cohorts required prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDKi). Primary endpoint of Part 1a/1b was determination of RP2D and primary endpoint of part 2 was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Additional endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and other efficacy analyses, and characterization of pharmacodynamic (PD) markers and pharmacokinetics. Results As of a data cut-off of July 6, 2023, 20 pts were enrolled in the Z+F+A cohort and had a median of four prior metastatic lines of therapy. In 19 evaluable pts in Z+F+A cohort, there were four confirmed partial responses (PR), one unconfirmed PR, and 10 pts with best overall response (OR) of stable disease (SD). All pts with PR/unconfirmed PR received prior CDKI, ful, and chemotherapy for MBC. Confirmed PRs were observed in patients with and without mutations in ESR1 and PIK3CA. mPFS, while not yet mature, exceeds 20 weeks. In Z+F+A the most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea (80%, all grades (Gr)) and nausea (75%, all Gr 1/2) and the most common Gr 3/4 AE was diarrhea (15%). In Z+F cohorts of 0.07 mg/kg QW (n=3), 0.1 mg/kg Q2W (n=3), and 0.14 Q2W (n= 2) there were no dose-limiting toxicities or Gr 5 adverse events (AEs). There was one confirmed PR and one SD in 0.1 and 0.14 mg/kg Q2W cohorts, respectively, and no PR or SD in the 0.07 mg/kg QW cohort. In Z+F+A, 9 pts had paired pre- and on-treatment ctDNA analyzed by Guardant assay. Of the remaining 11 pts, 4 came off study prior to scheduled collection of the on-treatment sample and 5 had unavailable samples. Of the 9 patients with paired samples, 8 had ctDNA decreases of >50%, all of whom had SD or PR. In the Z+F Q2W cohort, 2 of 3 patients had ctDNA decreases >50%, one of whom had a PR. Reduction below the limit of detection was seen for mutant alleles in ESR1, PIK3CA and other genes with potential to confer resistance to endocrine therapy. Conclusion Z+F+A showed encouraging efficacy in heavily pretreated ER+ MBC patients, with results that compare favorably to other treatment options available after progression on CDKi plus endocrine treatment. Efficacy was seen independent of ESR1 or PIK3CA mutations, suggesting the potential to treat a broad, unrestricted patient population. Initial results with Z+F Q2W dosing are encouraging and support continued dose escalation of this regimen. Citation Format: Ezra Y. Rosen, Manish Sharma, David Berz, Jennifer Caswell-Jin, Georgina Fulgar, Mark Densel, Gary Chiang, Samuel Sperry, Douglas Warner, Funda Meric-Bernstam. Phase 1/2 Dose Expansion Study Evaluating First-In-Class eIF4A Inhibitor Zotatifin in Patients with ER+ Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-05-03.

Abstract PO1-19-10: Durvalumab + datopotamab deruxtecan in patients with PD-L1 positive advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Arm 8 of the phase 1b/2, open label, platform BEGONIA study

Abstract Background: Patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (a/mTNBC) have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy is the standard of care for pts with PD-L1 positive tumors; still, most pts progress within a year, highlighting a need for new treatments. BEGONIA is an ongoing Simon 2-stage, multicenter, multi-arm platform study evaluating the safety and efficacy of durvalumab (D), an anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, with or without paclitaxel, in combination with novel oncology therapies as first-line treatment for a/mTNBC (NCT03742102). Datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of a humanized anti-trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 (TROP2) IgG1 monoclonal antibody linked to a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload via a plasma stable, tumor selective, tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker. TROP2 is broadly expressed on breast and other epithelial tumors and Dato-DXd monotherapy showed antitumor activity in heavily pretreated mTNBC pts (Bardia SABCS 2022 P6-10-03). Pts treated with Dato-DXd+D in Arm 7 of BEGONIA showed a 74% objective response rate (ORR) with median 7.2 months follow-up (Schmid SABCS 2022 PD11-09). Although responses were observed in both PD-L1–high and –low-expressing tumors, most pts (87%) had PD-L1–low-expressing tumors. In Arm 8 of BEGONIA, pts determined to have PD-L1 positive tumors by pre-existing/local testing will be recruited and treated with Dato-DXd+D to evaluate efficacy and safety in a PD-L1–high population. Methods: Eligible female pts are aged ≥18 years with untreated unresectable, locally advanced or mTNBC; ≥6 months between completion of treatment for earlier-stage breast cancer and recurrence of distant disease; ≥12 months since prior taxane therapy; ECOG PS 0/1; adequate organ function; and ≥1 nonirradiated measurable lesion. For inclusion in Arm 8, a PD-L1 positive tumor as determined by local immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing is required (either pre-existing or obtained during prescreening). Exclusion criteria for Arm 8 are clinically significant corneal disease; history or suspicion of interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis; underlying pulmonary disorder; prior exposure to immune-mediated therapy; or prior treatment with an ADC containing a topoisomerase I inhibitor. Arm 8 will evaluate Dato-DXd (6 mg/kg) + D (1120 mg) given intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumors will be assessed per RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks for 48 weeks, then every 12 weeks thereafter. A safety run-in will not occur for Arm 8, as Dato-DXd+D was evaluated in Arm 7 and was tolerable with no DLTs reported. Part 1 of Arm 8 will enroll 30 pts. The primary endpoint of Part 1 is safety and tolerability. A futility analysis will be performed with an option to expand Arm 8 to Part 2, where an additional 27 pts will be enrolled if expansion criteria are met. The primary endpoint for Part 2 is ORR. Secondary endpoints include ORR (Part 1 only), testing for antidrug antibodies and treatment pharmacokinetics (Part 1 only), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). ORR will be summarized with descriptive statistics and 95% Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals. Kaplan-Meier analysis will be used for DoR, PFS, and OS. All tumor response and survival endpoints will be based on investigator assessments. Additional PD-L1 testing with the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay will be performed on pretreatment tumor samples; high expression is defined as ≥10% of the tumor area populated by PD-L1–expressing tumor or immune cells. TROP2 expression will be assessed by IHC. Enrollment is ongoing. Funding: AstraZeneca/Daiichi Sankyo Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Cynthia Ma, Robert Huisden, Ross Stewart, Katrin Heider, Petra Vuković, Neelima Denduluri. Durvalumab + datopotamab deruxtecan in patients with PD-L1 positive advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Arm 8 of the phase 1b/2, open label, platform BEGONIA study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-19-10.

Bellwave-010: Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Nemtabrutinib Plus Venetoclax Versus Venetoclax Plus Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Following at Least One Prior Therapy

Background: Venetoclax + rituximab (VR) is a standard therapy among patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who have relapsed after at least 1 line of prior therapy. However, there is an unmet need for more effective treatments. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical signaling molecule in the pathogenesis of CLL, and inhibitors of BTK have resulted in significant improvements in survival for patients with CLL. Nemtabrutinib is a noncovalent, reversible, competitive inhibitor of BTK that does not require the C481 residue of BTK for binding and inhibition of kinase activity. As a result, nemtabrutinib can target both wild-type and C481-mutant forms of BTK. Results from the ongoing BELLWAVE-001 study have demonstrated manageable safety and durable antitumor activity of nemtabrutinib in patients with CLL/SLL with and without C481 mutations. The randomized, active-controlled, open-label, phase 3 BELLWAVE-010 study (NCT05947851) is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax versus VR as second-line (2L) or later treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL/SLL. Study Design and Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with active CLL/SLL that is relapsed/refractory to at least 1 prior therapy per the iwCLL 2018 criteria, an ECOG performance status of 0-2, and adequate organ function are eligible. Patients with Richter transformation, active central nervous system involvement, or severe bleeding disorder are excluded. Approximately 720 patients will be enrolled in 2 parts: an open-label, nonrandomized dose escalation and confirmation phase (part 1) to evaluate safety and determine the optimal dose of nemtabrutinib in combination with venetoclax and an open-label, parallel-group, randomized phase (part 2) comparing the efficacy and safety of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax with VR. In part 1, 30 patients will be enrolled to establish the dose of nemtabrutinib using a modified toxicity probability interval design. Patients will receive nemtabrutinib at 2 dose levels (45 mg PO QD starting dose, escalating to 65 mg PO QD) for 28 days followed by the combination of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax (20-400 mg PO QD ramp up over 4 weeks). In part 2, approximately 690 patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either nemtabrutinib at the recommended dose for 28 days followed by the combination of nemtabrutinib + venetoclax (20-400 mg PO QD ramp up over 4 weeks) or venetoclax (20-400 mg PO QD ramp up over 4 weeks) + rituximab (or rituximab biosimilar; 375 mg/m 2 at week 6 followed by 500 mg/m 2 Q4W starting at week 10 until week 26 [total 6 doses]). Patients will receive study treatment for ~2 years or until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or other discontinuation criteria are met. Randomization will be stratified by BTK-C481 mutation status (detected vs not detected; determined by droplet digital PCR with a limit of detection of approximately 0.01%-0.1%), geographic region (US/Canada vs Europe vs rest of world) and risk (high risk [del(17p) and/or TP53-mutated and/or IGHV-unmutated] vs low risk [absence of high-risk factors]). Response will be assessed (including imaging, physical examination, constitutional symptoms, hematological evaluations, and bone marrow biopsy as required) every 12 weeks up to week 97 and every 24 weeks thereafter or more frequently if clinically indicated. Adverse events will be monitored up to 30 days after treatment cessation (90 days for serious adverse events) and will be graded per NCI CTCAE, version 5.0. Hematologic toxicities will be evaluated according to iwCLL 2018 criteria. Patient-reported outcomes will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-CLL17, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. The primary end points for part 1 are safety and tolerability, including dose-limiting toxicities, and to establish the recommended dose of nemtabrutinib in combination with venetoclax. The primary end point for part 2 is PFS as assessed per iwCLL 2018 criteria by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary end points for part 2 include undetectable minimal residual disease in bone marrow at month 14 as assessed by central laboratory, ORR, and DOR per iwCLL 2018 criteria by BICR, OS, and safety. Exploratory end points include ORR including partial response with lymphocytosis, pharmacokinetics, and health-related quality of life.

Will Survival Improve By Treating Multiple Myeloma Patients at MRD Relapse? the Remnant Study

Background: Although many new treatment options have become available, multiple myeloma (MM) is still considered an incurable disease. The importance of achieving minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in MM patients has become clearer in recent years. Multiple studies show that bone marrow based MRD assessment is one of the strongest prognostic factors, and deeper responses correlate with more favorable outcomes. The REMNANT study will evaluate if treating at MRD relapse after first line (1.L) treatment prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MM patients. Methods: The REMNANT study (RElapse from Mrd Negativity As iNdication for Treatment) is an academic, multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2/3 study of newly diagnosed (ND) MM patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The study has a population-based approach with few exclusion criteria, implying that patients with kidney failure, amyloidosis, plasma cell leukemia and other comorbidities are enrolled. To increase enrollment in part 2, patients who have received 1.L treatment outside the REMNANT study can be enrolled directly if they are >CR/MRD negative. 391 NDMM patients (age 18-75 years) eligible for ASCT will be enrolled in part 1 (phase 2) of the study and receive standard of care Norwegian 1.L treatment; 4 pre-transplant induction and 4 post-transplant consolidation cycles of bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd). After induction, patients will undergo tandem or single transplant, depending on toxicity and response to first transplant. All patients receive lenalidomide maintenance. Following 1.L treatment 176 patients achieving MRD negative (Euroflow NGF 10 -5) complete response will be enrolled in part 2 (phase 3) of the study. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive second line treatment (2.L) at MRD relapse in arm A or at PD in arm B. At loss of MRD negativity in arm A or at PD in arm B, 2.L treatment will be daratumumab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone until PD. The primary endpoint of part 1 (phase 2) of the study is the number of patients who achieve MRD negative (Euroflow NGF 10 -5) complete response 30-45 days post consolidation. Secondary endpoints includes response rates, safety evaluations and patient-reported outcome. The co- primary endpoints in part 2 (phase 3) are PSF and OS from randomization to progressive disease or death on 2.L treatment. We will also compare different methods for measuring MRD: NGF Euroflow, Next Generation Sequencing, mass spectrometry and PET-CT. We want to evaluate how the different methods compare when it comes to sensitivity and outcome (PFS and OS). Results: As of July 18 th 2023, 291 patients are enrolled in part 1 and 97 in part 2 (23 directly enrolled). Baseline characteristics, safety summary and preliminary results can be found in Table 1. The ORR on first line treatment is 95% and 65 of 152 patients (45%) were >CR and MRD negative at the post-consolidation visit. Patients achieving > VGPR but not CR MRD negativity post consolidation are followed for up to 24 months on lenalidomide maintenance, and 11 of 74 patients (15%) in follow-up have converted to >CR/MRD negativity at a median time of seven months (range 2-16). Nine patients have started 2.L treatment in part 2 (phase 3), eight in arm A (MRD guided) and one in arm B (control arm). Median time to loss of MRD negativity among the eight patients in arm A was four months (range 1-6). The most common adverse events were infections, occurring in 24% of patients (any grade). During 1.L treatment, 61 patients have left the study. Seven patients have died, 27 discontinued due to disease progression, 12 patients have withdrawn from the study and seven discontinued due to adverse events. 59% of the patients who progressed during 1. L treatment had high-risk cytogenetics (with gain1q and/or del17p and/or t(4;14)). Conclusion: Standard of care Norwegian first line treatment has an ORR of 95%. The MRD negativity rate among patients who have finished 1.L treatment was 43% (65 of 152). The median time to loss of MRD negativity in arm A (MRD guided) was 4 months.

Initial Report of Part B Phase 1/2 Efficacy and Safety Results for Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Rilzabrutinib in Patients with Relapsed Immune Thrombocytopenia

Introduction: Rilzabrutinib is a potent oral, reversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor that can treat hematological autoimmune diseases through multiple putative mechanisms of action: (1) inhibition of B-cell activation, (2) interruption of antibody-coated cell phagocytosis by FcϒR in spleen and liver, and (3) induce sustained anti-inflammatory effects (Langrish J Immunol 2021). Preliminary evidence showed that rilzabrutinib treatment resulted in rapid and durable platelet responses with a favorable safety profile in previously treated patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) as studied in part A of a phase 1/2 clinical study (LUNA 2; Kuter N Engl J Med 2022). This abstract summarizes the results of part B that focused on the durability of response with rilzabrutinib in relapsed ITP patients. Methods: Part B of the multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of rilzabrutinib 400 mg bid in patients with relapsed ITP (NCT03395210). Adult patients aged 18-80 y were eligible with ≥2 baseline platelet counts <30x10 9/L no less than 7 days apart in the 15 days before the first dose. Eligible patients were required to have a past response (achievement of platelet count ≥50x10 9/L) to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg)/anti-D or corticosteroid (CS) that was not sustained and failed ≥1 other ITP therapy (that was not IVIg or CS). Stable doses of concomitant CS/thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) were allowed with rilzabrutinib. The primary endpoints for part B were safety and durable platelet response defined as platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L on ≥8 of the last 12 weeks of rilzabrutinib without rescue medication. Patients completing 24 weeks of rilzabrutinib with platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L or ≥30x10 9/L and doubling from baseline in ≥4 of the last 8 weeks of treatment without rescue medication could continue rilzabrutinib in the long-term extension (LTE) period. Results: At baseline, 26 enrolled patients had a median age of 57 y (range, 20-75), 62% were female, and median baseline platelet count was 13x10 9/L (range, 2-24x10 9/L). Patients had a median duration of ITP of 10.3 y (range, 0.7-48.2) and had received a median of 6 prior unique ITP therapies (range, 3-19; 46% splenectomy). Seventeen patients (65%) received concomitant non-rescue CS and/or TPO-RA. Nine patients (35%; 95% CI, 17%-56%) achieved the primary endpoint of durable platelet response. Approximately 25% of patients achieved platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L by day 15 of rilzabrutinib treatment (Figure 1A). In 16 patients who achieved platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L, median time to first platelet count ≥50x10 9/L was 15 days (range, 7-134). Median platelet counts for all patients (responders and non-responders) increased over time, exceeding the platelet count thresholds of 30x10 9/L at day 57 and 50x10 9/L at day 120 (Figure 1B). The mean number of weeks with platelet counts ≥50x10 9/L and/or ≥30x10 9/L and doubling from baseline was both 9.3 weeks (SD, 10.1). Three patients (12%) received rescue medication in the main treatment period. Fifteen patients (58%) completed 24 weeks of rilzabrutinib and 11 (42%) entered the LTE. Over the main treatment period, the median duration of treatment was 167 days (range, 7-169). Sixteen patients (62%) had ≥1 related treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), including 35% diarrhea, 23% headache, and 15% nausea. Most AEs were grade 1 or 2; there was 1 treatment-related AE of grade 3 blood creatinine phosphokinase increase. There was no treatment-related grade ≥2 bleeding/thrombotic events or infections, serious AEs, or deaths. Conclusion: Part B study results were consistent with part A. Rilzabrutinib demonstrated rapid, stable, and durable platelet responses in patients with relapsed ITP, with a favorable safety profile in part B.

Single-dose 177Lu-PSMA-617 followed by maintenance pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an open-label, dose-expansion, phase 1 trial

Checkpoint inhibitors have been shown to have limited activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. We aimed to determine whether a single dose of lutetium-177 [177Lu]-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) followed by maintenance pembrolizumab was safe and could induce durable clinical benefit. We did an open-label, dose-expansion, phase 1 study at the University of California, San Francisco (San Fransisco, CA, USA). Eligible patients were men aged 18 years or older with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, had progression on one or more androgen signalling inhibitors, and at least three PSMA-avid lesions on 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography. In part A, patients were enrolled sequentially to one of three schedules in which a single dose of 177Lu-PSMA-617 (7·4 GBq) was given intravenously 28 days before (schedule 1), concomitant with (schedule 2), or 21 days after (schedule 3) the start of maintenance intravenous pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks). In part B, 25 patients were enrolled using the recommended phase 2 schedule. The primary endpoint in part A was determination of the recommended phase 2 schedule, and in part B, the objective response rate. The analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or 177Lu-PSMA-617. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03805594. Between Aug 8, 2019 and May 7, 2022, 43 male patients were enrolled (n=18 part A [six patients per schedule]; n=25 part B), with a median follow-up of 16·5 months (IQR 12·2-21·9). Schedule 1 was selected as the recommended phase 2 schedule for part B, on the basis of safety and feasibility of administration observed in part A. In part B, 14 (56%; 95% CI 35-76) of 25 patients had a confirmed objective response. Two (5%) of 43 patients had a treatment-related adverse event of grade 3 or worse (grade 3 arthritis in schedule 2, grade 3 pneumonitis in schedule 3). One serious adverse event (one death due to aspiration pneumonia) and no treatment-related deaths were observed. A single priming dose of 177Lu-PSMA-617 followed by pembrolizumab maintenance was safe and had encouraging preliminary activity in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Foundation, National Cancer Institute, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, and Merck.

LITESPARK-024: A randomized phase 1/2 study of belzutifan with or without palbociclib for previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma

Abstract Background Immunotherapy is a standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, many patients will develop resistance to first-line therapy, and effective second- and later-line treatment options are therefore needed. The von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene is inactivated in approximately 90% of patients with RCC and results in the constitutive activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α), a key oncogenic driver in RCC. Belzutifan, a first-in-class HIF-2α inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity with manageable safety in previously treated patients with advanced ccRCC. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) pathway is also associated with poor clinical outcomes in ccRCC. In RCC cell lines, the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib inhibited cell growth. CDK 4/6 inhibition has shown synergistic antiproliferative effects with HIF-2α inhibition in HIF-2α–dependent VHL -/- RCC cell lines. Palbociclib could therefore potentially enhance the efficacy of belzutifan as combination therapy for previously treated pts with advanced RCC. Methods LITESPARK-024 is a 2-part, open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 randomized study (NCT05468697). Part 1 is intended to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of belzutifan plus palbociclib using a modified toxicity probability interval design. After the RP2D is established, part 2 will directly compare the safety and efficacy of belzutifan monotherapy with belzutifan + palbociclib in patients with advanced ccRCC. In both parts, patients with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, a Karnofsky Performance Status score of ≥70%, and histologically confirmed unresectable stage IV RCC with a clear cell component and disease progressing on or after receiving at least 2 systemic treatments (both an anti–PD-1/L1 monoclonal antibody and a VEGF receptor–targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in sequence or in combination) will be enrolled. Up to 30 patients will be enrolled into 3 dose groups in part 1 and will receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily plus palbociclib (75, 100, or 125 mg) daily for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off. In part 2, approximately 150 patients will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily plus palbociclib RP2D (21 consecutive days/7 days off) or belzutifan 120 mg once daily. Patients will be stratified by International metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk (0 vs 1-2 vs 3-6) and sarcomatoid histology (yes vs no) at randomization in part 2. The primary end point for part 1 is to assess dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events and to determine the RP2D of belzutifan plus palbociclib. The primary end point for part 2 is objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Secondary end points for part 2 are clinical benefit rate, duration of response, and progression-free survival per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment; overall survival, and safety and tolerability. Enrollment began in July 2022. ©2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. All rights reserved. CDMRP DOD Funding: no

LITESPARK-024: Randomized phase 1/2 study of belzutifan with or without palbociclib for treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

TPS4603 Background: Immunotherapy is a standard-of-care first-line treatment for advanced clear cell RCC (ccRCC). However, many patients (pts) will develop resistance to first-line therapy, and effective second- and later-line treatment options are therefore needed. The von Hippel-Lindau ( VHL) gene is inactivated in approximately 90% of ccRCC cases and results in the constitutive activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α), a key oncogenic driver in RCC. Belzutifan, a first-in-class HIF-2α inhibitor, has demonstrated antitumor activity with manageable safety in previously treated pts with advanced ccRCC. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) pathway is also associated with poor clinical outcomes in ccRCC. In RCC cell lines, the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib inhibited cell growth. CDK 4/6 inhibition has shown synergistic antiproliferative effects with HIF-2α inhibition in HIF-2α–dependent VHL -/- RCC cell lines. Palbociclib could therefore potentially enhance the efficacy of belzutifan as combination therapy for previously treated pts with advanced RCC. Methods: LITESPARK-024 is a 2-part, open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 randomized study (NCT05468697). Part 1 is intended to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of belzutifan + palbociclib using a modified toxicity probability interval design. After the RP2D is established, part 2 will directly compare the safety and efficacy of belzutifan monotherapy with belzutifan + palbociclib in pts with advanced ccRCC. In both parts, pts with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, a KPS score of ≥70%, and histologically confirmed unresectable stage IV RCC with a clear cell component with disease progressing on or after receiving at least 2 systemic treatments (both an anti–PD-1/L1 monoclonal antibody and a VEGF receptor–targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in sequence or in combination) will be enrolled. Up to 30 pts will be enrolled into 3 dose groups in part 1 and will receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily + palbociclib (75, 100, or 125 mg) daily for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off. In part 2, approximately 150 pts will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily + palbociclib RP2D (21 consecutive days/7 days off) or belzutifan 120 mg once daily. Pts will be stratified by IMDC risk (0 vs 1-2 vs 3-6) and sarcomatoid histology (yes vs no) at randomization in part 2. The primary end point for part 1 is to assess dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events and to determine the RP2D of belzutifan + palbociclib. The primary end point for part 2 is ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Secondary end points for part 2 are CBR, DOR, and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment, OS, and safety and tolerability. Enrollment began in July 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT05468697 .

Safety and clinical activity of oleclumab (O) ± durvalumab (D) + chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC): A phase 1b/2 randomized study.

4136 Background: In a phase 1 study, the anti-CD73 monoclonal antibody (mAb) O plus the anti-PD-L1 mAb D showed antitumor activity and manageable safety in previously treated pts with advanced PDAC (Overman et al, J Clin Oncol 2018;36[suppl 15]:abs 4123). Here we report a multicenter, open-label study of O ± D + CT in pts with mPDAC. Methods: Pts were ≥18 years old with ECOG PS 0–1. Part 1 was a dose escalation phase: in Cohort A, previously untreated (1L) pts received O 1500 or 3000 mg IV Q2W for 4 doses then Q4W + D 1500 mg IV Q4W, with Q4W gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP). In Cohort B, pts with previous G-based CT (2L) received O 1500 or 3000 mg Q2W for 4 doses then Q4W + D 1500 mg Q4W, with Q4W mFOLFOX. The primary objective for Part 1 was safety and tolerability; secondary objectives included antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics (PK). Part 2 was an expansion phase in which pts were stratified by high/low tumoral CD73 expression by IHC. In Cohort A, 1L pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GnP alone (Arm A1), O + GnP (Arm A2) or O + D + GnP (Arm A3). O was given at the recommended phase 2 dose, 3000 mg. Cohort B did not proceed to dose expansion due to emerging therapies in 2L PDAC pts. The primary endpoint for Part 2 was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1; secondary included PFS, OS, safety, PK and antidrug antibody data. Results: As of November 11, 2022, 25 pts were treated in Part 1 (Cohort A, n=14; Cohort B, n=11), and 170 pts were treated in Part 2 (Arm A1, n=62; Arm A2, n=38; Arm A3, n=70). In Part 1, dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 1 pt (Cohort B, O 3000 mg: Gr 3 nausea and Gr 3 localized edema). Safety was generally similar in Parts 1 and 2. In Part 2, Gr ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 85.5%, 89.5% and 90.0% of pts in Arms A1, A2 and A3 respectively, most commonly neutropenia (22.6%, 34.2% and 17.1%). In Part 2, TEAEs led to discontinuation in 11.3%, 23.7% and 24.3% of pts respectively. In Part 2, ORR was similar across Arms with a trend toward longer PFS and OS in Arm 3 vs Arm 1. There was a trend toward greater clinical benefit in pts with high CD73 expression when comparing Arm A3 vs Arm A1. Conclusions: O + D + GnP had similar safety and a trend toward improved outcomes compared to GnP. Clinical trial information: NCT03611556 . [Table: see text]

EPIK-B6: A phase 2, open-label, 2-part, multicenter study of alpelisib in combination with fulvestrant for men and postmenopausal women with PIK3CA mutation HR–positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer, which progressed on/after aromatase inhibitor treatment in Japan.

TPS1117 Background: The PIK3CA oncogene mutation, seen in ~40% of patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC), is associated with endocrine treatment resistance and shorter survival. Alpelisib, an α-selective PI3K inhibitor and degrader, was established as standard therapy in combination with fulvestrant for patients with HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated aBC following progression on/after endocrine-based regimen based on the phase 3 SOLAR-1 study. However, alpelisib is not yet approved in Japan. In the SOLAR-1 study, a high percentage of Japanese patients experienced dose reductions/interruptions (78.5% vs 84.4%), and/or discontinuation (56.3% vs 25.0%) of alpelisib in early stages compared with overall population, due to adverse events such as rash and hyperglycemia. Thus, it is difficult to assess the consistency of the benefit of alpelisib + fulvestrant in Japanese patients as compared to overall population due to the short duration of alpelisib exposure and low-dose intensity. The EPIK-B6 study aims to determine the recommended dose (RD) of alpelisib in Japanese patients as well as assess the efficacy and safety of alpelisib + fulvestrant in Japanese men and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated aBC, which progressed while on/after aromatase inhibitor treatment, prior/post CDK 4/6i use. Methods: The EPIK-B6 study is designed as a phase 2, open-labelled, 2-part, multicenter study. Part 1 is to determine RD of alpelisib to be used in part 2. Part 2 is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of alpelisib (RD starting on cycle 1 day 1 [C1D1]) + fulvestrant (500 mg on C1D1 and C1D15, and D1 of subsequent cycles) after completion of part 1, in participants with/without prior CDK 4/6i use. Adult Japanese men or postmenopausal women with confirmed HR+, HER2-, PIK3CA-mutated aBC and ≥1 measurable lesion as per RECIST 1.1 criteria are eligible. Patients previously treated with fulvestrant, any PI3K, mTOR or AKT inhibitors are excluded. Use of prophylactic antihistamine is highly recommended for prevention of rash. The primary endpoint for part 2 is overall response rate based on assessments per RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, time to response, time to deterioration of ECOG performance status, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. Part 1 has been completed, and recruitment for part 2 is ongoing until August 2023 approximately. As of December 2022, 9 and 8 patients are enrolled in part 1 and 2, respectively. The study will include approximately 50 participants. Primary Analysis is planned in 2024 after at least 6 months follow-up period. Clinical trial information: NCT04524000 .

A phase 2 study of HER3-DXd in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

1004 Background: HER3-DXd is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of a fully human anti-HER3 IgG1 monoclonal antibody (patritumab), attached to a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor via a tetrapeptide-based cleavable linker that has shown promising efficacy in pts with HER3-expressing MBC (Krop, 2022). This 3-part Phase 2 study examines efficacy of HER3-DXd across MBC subsets and defines the pt population likely to derive greater benefit (NCT04699630). Methods: Part A is reported here (Data cutoff 6Sep2022). Pts had HER2 negative MBC with measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, 0-2 prior chemo and prior endocrine therapy (ET) + CDK4/6 inhibitor for hormone receptor (HR)+ BC, or 1-3 prior chemo for triple negative BC (TNBC). Prior treatment (tx) with anti-HER3 agents and ADCs with exatecan derivatives were prohibited. Pts provided pre-tx tissue to evaluate the association of biomarker expression with progression free survival at 6 months (PFS6months). Primary endpoints for Part A are objective response rate (ORR) and PFS6months. Secondary endpoints are safety/tolerability, duration of response (DOR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) (CR, PR or SD ≥180 days). Results: 60 pts were treated in Part A: median age 57.5 y, 98.3% female; median 5 prior lines of therapy (range 1-15). 32% had TNBC. 48% were HR+. 48% had liver and 32% had lung metastases. HER3 membrane expression was evaluated by overall % membrane positivity at 10X. 47/60 (78%) pts provided evaluable samples at baseline. Among evaluable pts, 64% (30/47) had HER3 expression ≥75%, 28% (13/47) had 25-74% expression and 8% (4/47) had <25% expression. The median tx duration was 5.2 mos and 21 pts remained on tx at data cut-off. All pts experienced a tx emergent adverse event and 93% of pts experienced a tx related AE (TRAE) with Gr ≥3 TRAE in 19 pts (32%). The most common (≥ 25%) any grade TRAEs were nausea (50%), fatigue (45%), diarrhea (37%), vomiting (32%), alopecia and anemia (30% each). 7 pts (12%) experienced a serious AE (SAE), including 4 pts (7%) with a related SAE (interstitial lung disease, nausea/vomiting, pneumonitis, thrombocytopenia). 15% of pts experienced a dose reduction and 23% experienced a dose interruption due to an AE. 3 pts died while on tx, 2 unrelated to tx 1 cause unknown. ORR was 35% (95% CIs 23.1, 48.1) for all pts, and the CBR was 48% (95% CIs 35.2, 61.6). Pts with ≥75% HER3 expression had an ORR of 33% and CBR of 50%, pts with HER3 25-74% expression had an ORR of 46% and CBR of 54%. There were 4 pts with HER3 < 25% expression, limiting efficacy assessment. The median DOR was 10.0 mos (95% CIs 5.5, NA). The PFS6months was 60% for all pts, 50% for pts with HER3 ≥75%, and 70% for pts with HER3 25-74%. Conclusions: HER3-DXd had an acceptable safety profile, and the data further confirm the clinical activity in MBC in heavy pre-tx MBC across the broad range of HER3 expression levels. Parts B and Z are ongoing and data from this report support the potential entry of HER3-DXd into the therapeutic paradigm in MBC. Clinical trial information: NCT04699630 .

Abstract CT120: The randomized phase 1/2 LITESPARK-024 study of belzutifan with or without palbociclib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

Abstract Background: First-line treatment with immunotherapy alone or in combination with antiangiogenic agents is a standard of care for advanced RCC. Many patients (pts) develop resistance to first-line treatment and effective second-line and beyond options are needed. The von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene is inactivated in approximately 90% of RCC cases, which results in the constitutive activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α), a key oncogenic driver in RCC. The first-in-class HIF-2α inhibitor belzutifan has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in previously treated pts with advanced RCC. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) pathway has also been implicated in RCC and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. In RCC cell lines, the CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib inhibited cell growth. The addition of CDK 4/6 inhibition had synergistic antiproliferative effects with HIF-2α inhibition in HIF-2α-dependent VHL -/- RCC cell lines. Palbociclib could therefore potentially enhance the efficacy of belzutifan as combination therapy for previously treated pts with advanced RCC. Methods: The two-part, open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 randomized LITESPARK-024 study (NCT05468697) is intended to establish the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of belzutifan + palbociclib in combination with a modified toxicity probability interval design (Part 1), followed by a direct comparison of belzutifan monotherapy to the combination with respect to safety and efficacy in pts with advanced RCC (Part 2). Pts with histologically confirmed unresectable stage IV RCC with a clear cell component, whose disease progressed on or after having received at least 2 systemic treatments (both an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody and a VEGF receptor-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in sequence or in combination), have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review, and have KPS score of ≥70% will be enrolled. Up to 30 pts will be enrolled into 3 dose groups in Part 1 and will receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily + palbociclib (75, 100, or 125 mg) daily for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off. In part 2, approximately 150 pts will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily + palbociclib RP2D (21 consecutive days/7 days off) or belzutifan 120 mg once daily. Pts will be stratified by IMDC risk (0 vs 1-2 vs 3-6) and sarcomatoid histology (yes vs no) at randomization in part 2. The primary end point for part 1 is to assess dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events to determine the RP2D of belzutifan + palbociclib. The primary end point for part 2 is ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Secondary end points for part 2 are CBR, DOR, PFS, OS, and safety and tolerability. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. All rights reserved. Citation Format: David F. McDermott, Avivit Peer, Neeraj Agarwal, Michael B. Atkins, Jerry Cornell, Rodolfo F. Perini, Kenneth F. Grossmann, Howard Gurney. The randomized phase 1/2 LITESPARK-024 study of belzutifan with or without palbociclib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT120.

A Phase 2b, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-arm, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Tesnatilimab in Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease.

Tesnatilimab, a monoclonal antibody targeting NKG2D, was evaluated in Crohn's disease [CD] patients who had failed or were intolerant to biologic or conventional therapy. TRIDENT was a phase 2b, two-part, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, multicenter study. In Part 1 [proof of concept], 145 patients who were biologic intolerant or refractory [Bio-IR] or had not failed biologic therapy [Bio-NF] were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to placebo subcutaneously [SC] or tesnatilimab 400 mg SC. In Part 2 [dose ranging], 243 Bio-IR and Bio-NF patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio to placebo, tesnatilimab [50 mg, 150 mg, 400 mg], or intravenous infusion of ustekinumab ~6 mg/kg at Week 0 and 90 mg SC at Weeks 8 and 16. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] at Week 8 [Part 1] and Week 12 [Part 2]. Clinical and endoscopic remission/response were evaluated. Efficacy analyses were also assessed by NKG2D and MICB single nucleotide polymorphism [SNP] status [SNP-positive means positive in at least one of two SNPs]. Safety events were summarised. In Part 1, mean change from baseline in CDAI score was significantly greater with tesnatilimab vs placebo at Week 8 [-103.6 vs -60.0; p < 0.01]. In Part 2, no dose-response signal was detected. Mean changes from baseline in CDAI at Week 12 were -93.2, -72.2, and -84.3 for low, middle, and high doses of tesnatilimab, respectively, vs -59.2 for placebo and -148.8 for ustekinumab. Similar reductions from baseline in CDAI score were observed in patients receiving tesnatilimab, regardless of SNP status. Clinical remission rates were greater with tesnatilimab than placebo in Parts 1 and 2, whereas endoscopic response rates were greater with tesnatilimab only in Part 1. No unexpected safety events occurred. Tesnatilimab was well tolerated. The efficacy of tesnatilimab in patients with CD was significant for the primary endpoint in Part 1; however, no dose-response signal was detected for the primary endpoint in Part 2. Based on these inconsistent findings, tesnatilimab was not considered an effective treatment for patients with CD and no further development is planned. NCT02877134.

Phase 3 Open-Label Clinical Trial of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children Aged 2-5 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele.

Rationale: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) has been shown to be safe and effective in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged ⩾6 years with at least one F508del-CFTR allele but has not been studied in younger children. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children with CF aged 2-5 years. Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, two-part study (parts A and B), children weighing <14 kg (on Day 1) received ELX 80 mg once daily (qd), TEZ 40 mg qd, and IVA 60 mg each morning and 59.5 mg each evening; children weighing ⩾14 kg received ELX 100 mg qd, TEZ 50 mg qd, and IVA 75 mg every 12 hours. Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoints for part A (15-d treatment period) were pharmacokinetics and safety and tolerability. For part B (24-wk treatment period), the primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and absolute changes from baseline in sweat chloride concentration and lung clearance index2.5 (LCI2.5, defined as the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal N2 concentration to 2.5% of its starting value) through Week 24. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data from 18 children enrolled in part A confirmed the appropriateness of the part B dosing regimen. In part B, 75 children (F508del/minimal function genotypes, n = 52; F508del/F508del genotype, n = 23) were enrolled and dosed. Seventy-four children (98.7%) had adverse events, which were all mild (62.7%) or moderate (36.0%) in severity. The most common adverse events were cough, fever, and rhinorrhea. Decreases in sweat chloride concentration (-57.9 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -61.3 to -54.6; n = 69) and LCI2.5 (-0.83 U; 95% CI, -1.01 to -0.66; n = 50) were observed from baseline through Week 24. Mean body mass index was within the normal range at baseline and remained stable at Week 24. Conclusions: In this open-label study in children 2-5 years of age, ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that observed in older age groups, and led to clinically meaningful reductions in sweat chloride concentration and LCI2.5. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04537793).

Safety and efficacy of vanzacaftor–tezacaftor–deutivacaftor in adults with cystic fibrosis: randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2 trials

Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been shown to be safe and efficacious in people with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del allele. Our aim was to identify a novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator combination capable of further increasing CFTR-mediated chloride transport, with the potential for once-daily dosing. We conducted two phase 2 clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of a once-daily combination of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in participants with cystic fibrosis who were aged 18 years or older. A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study (VX18-561-101; April 17, 2019, to Aug 20, 2020) was carried out to compare deutivacaftor monotherapy with ivacaftor monotherapy in participants with CFTR gating mutations, following a 4-week ivacaftor monotherapy run-in period. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h, deutivacaftor 25 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 50 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily, or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily in a 1:1:2:2:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline at week 12. A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, controlled, proof-of-concept study of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (VX18-121-101; April 30, 2019, to Dec 10, 2019) was conducted in participants with cystic fibrosis and heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function mutation (F/MF genotypes) or homozygous for F508del (F/F genotype). Participants with F/MF genotypes were randomly assigned 1:2:2:1 to receive either 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg of vanzacaftor in combination with tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or a triple placebo for 4 weeks, and participants with the F/F genotype were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor active control for 4 weeks, following a 4-week tezacaftor-ivacaftor run-in period. Primary endpoints for part 1 and part 2 were safety and tolerability and absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline to day 29. Secondary efficacy endpoints were absolute change from baseline at day 29 in sweat chloride concentrations and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score. These clinical trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03911713 and NCT03912233, and are complete. In study VX18-561-101, participants treated with deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily (n=23) or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily (n=24) had mean absolute changes in ppFEV1 of 3·1 percentage points (95% CI -0·8 to 7·0) and 2·7 percentage points (-1·0 to 6·5) from baseline at week 12, respectively, versus -0·8 percentage points (-6·2 to 4·7) with ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h (n=11); the deutivacaftor safety profile was consistent with the established safety profile of ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h. In study VX18-121-101, participants with F/MF genotypes treated with vanzacaftor (5 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=9), vanzacaftor (10 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=19), vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=20), and placebo (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline at day 29 in ppFEV1 of 4·6 percentage points (-1·3 to 10·6), 14·2 percentage points (10·0 to 18·4), 9·8 percentage points (5·7 to 13·8), and 1·9 percentage points (-4·1 to 8·0), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -42·8 mmol/L (-51·7 to -34·0), -45·8 mmol/L (95% CI -51·9 to -39·7), -49·5 mmol/L (-55·9 to -43·1), and 2·3 mmol/L (-7·0 to 11·6), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 17·6 points (3·5 to 31·6), 21·2 points (11·9 to 30·6), 29·8 points (21·0 to 38·7), and 3·3 points (-10·1 to 16·6), respectively. Participants with the F/F genotype treated with vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=18) and tezacaftor-ivacaftor (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline (taking tezacaftor-ivacaftor) at day 29 in ppFEV1 of 15·9 percentage points (11·3 to 20·6) and -0·1 percentage points (-6·4 to 6·1), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -45·5 mmol/L (-49·7 to -41·3) and -2·6 mmol/L (-8·2 to 3·1), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 19·4 points (95% CI 10·5 to 28·3) and -5·0 points (-16·9 to 7·0), respectively. The most common adverse events overall were cough, increased sputum, and headache. One participant in the vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor group had a serious adverse event of infective pulmonary exacerbation and another participant had a serious rash event that led to treatment discontinuation. For most participants, adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Once-daily dosing with vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor was safe and well tolerated and improved lung function, respiratory symptoms, and CFTR function. These results support the continued investigation of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in phase 3 clinical trials compared with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. Vertex Pharmaceuticals.

LITESPARK-024: A randomized phase 1/2 study of belzutifan with or without palbociclib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

TPS747 Background: The combination of immunotherapy with antiangiogenic agents is a well-established first-line treatment option for patients (pts) with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but many pts develop resistance, and effective second- or subsequent-line options are needed. The von Hippel-Lindau ( VHL) gene is inactivated in approximately 90% of RCC cases, which results in the constitutive activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α) signaling. HIF-2α is involved in angiogenesis, tumor growth, proliferation, and metastasis, and is a key oncogenic driver in RCC. The HIF-2α inhibitor belzutifan has demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable safety in pts with heavily pretreated RCC. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) pathway is altered in several cancer types, including RCC, and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib inhibited cell growth in RCC cell lines, and the antiproliferative effects of CDK 4/6 inhibition were synergistic with HIF-2α inhibition in HIF-2α–dependent VHL -/- clear cell RCC cell lines. We hypothesized palbociclib could potentially enhance the efficacy of belzutifan as combination therapy for previously treated pts with advanced RCC. Methods: LITESPARK-024 (NCT05468697) is an open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 randomized study of belzutifan + palbociclib versus belzutifan monotherapy in pts with advanced RCC. Pts must have histologically confirmed unresectable stage IV RCC with a clear cell component, received at least 2 prior systemic regimens (both an anti–PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibody and a VEGF receptor–targeted TKI, in sequence or in combination), have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, have KPS score of ≥70%, and have radiographic disease progression on or after the most recent regimen per investigator. Part 1 will evaluate the safety of belzutifan + palbociclib and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the combination using a modified toxicity probability interval design. Part 2 will evaluate the safety and efficacy of belzutifan + palbociclib versus belzutifan alone. In part 1, ≤30 pts will be enrolled into 3 dose groups and receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily + palbociclib (75, 100, or 125 mg) daily for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off. In part 2, approximately 150 pts will be randomly assigned 2:1 to receive belzutifan 120 mg once daily + palbociclib RP2D (21 consecutive days/7 days off) or belzutifan 120 mg once daily. Pts will be stratified by IMDC risk (0 vs 1-2 vs 3-6) and sarcomatoid histology (yes vs no) at randomization in part 2. The primary end point for part 1 is to assess dose-limiting toxicities and adverse events to determine the RP2D of belzutifan + palbociclib. The primary end point for part 2 is ORR per RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Secondary end points for part 2 are clinical benefit rate, DOR, PFS, OS, and safety and tolerability. Clinical trial information: NCT05468697 .

NOVA-II: Part 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OQL011 on VEGF inhibitor-associated hand-foot skin reaction in patients with cancer.

TPS741 Background: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is associated with the use of multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors sharing vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (VEGFRi) activity (e.g., cabozantinib, regorafenib, sorafenib, sunitinib). HFSR results from impaired vascular repair mechanisms from inhibition of VEGF signaling and is characterized by painful palmoplantar lesions that may impact the quality of life and consistent dosing of anticancer agents. NOVA-II is a two-part, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating OQL011, a nitroglycerin (NTG) topical ointment. Part 1 enrolled 31 subjects and studied OQL011 0.2% NTG for Grade ≥2 NCI CTCAE v5.0 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE). Part 1 safety and pharmacokinetic data support the continuance of NOVA-II, Part 2 dose-ranging study. The Part 1 inclusion criteria and primary endpoint were based on NCI CTCAE PPE. A unique investigator global assessment (IGA) was evaluated in Part 1 for HFSR severity (Grades 0-4) and has been revised utilizing Part 1 data for use as the primary endpoint for Part 2. We hypothesize that OQL011 containing NTG, a nitric oxide donor releasing free nitric oxide and activating guanylate cyclase in skin vessels, will mitigate HFSR symptoms and disease severity via local upregulation of the VEGF/VEGFR signaling pathways. Methods: NOVA-II Part 2 is a global, dose-ranging phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 doses of OQL011 (0.1%, 0.2%, and 0.5% NTG) compared to vehicle control for the treatment of moderate to severe VEGFRi associated HFSR. Part 2 will enroll up to 140 patients (randomized 1:1:1:1; vehicle: OQL011@ 0.1%: 0.2%: 0.5% NTG) with IGA Grade ≥3 (IGA scale 0-4). Subjects will apply the study drug (i.e., OQL011 or vehicle) to palmar and plantar surfaces TID and will be evaluated at Visit 1 (Day 0), Visit 2 (Day 14), and Visit 3 (Day 28). The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving an IGA Grade ≤1 at Visit 2 (Day 14). A superiority test will be performed to compare each of the OQL011 doses to the vehicle, and the study drug exposure-response relationship will be explored. The correlation between IGA and NCI CTCAE v5.0 PPE, patient-reported outcomes including a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), and Hand-foot Quality of Life (HF-QoL) questionnaire will be measured. Pharmacokinetics will be evaluated in a subset of subjects randomized 2:2:2:1, with 6 patients in each of the 3 OQL011 dose level groups and 3 patients in the vehicle group. PK samples will be collected on Day 0 at pre-dose, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 1 h, 1.5 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, and 8 h, after the first application of investigational drugs. Study enrollment for Part 2 is currently ongoing in the United States, India, and China. (NCT04088318) Clinical trial information: NCT04088318 .