Undifferentiated dyspnea is among the most challenging emergency department (ED) presentations. Emergency physicians (EP) must often perform critical actions while operating with diagnostic uncertainty. Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has been shown to be highly beneficial in the initial evaluation of dyspneic patients but prior studies often study POCUS performed by experts or a dedicated physician ultrasound (US) team. Performance of POCUS by the primary treating team is often limited by the time and workflow constraints. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of POCUS in narrowing diagnostic uncertainty and guiding initial management of acutely dyspneic patients when performed by treating EP compared to a dedicated US team. This is a multi-center, prospective non-inferiority cohort study investigating the effect of POCUS on the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea. During the initial evaluation of these patients, the primary attending provider completed a survey evaluating initial differential diagnosis and treatment plan. The provider team or a separate US team then performed targeted POCUS on the patient. After POCUS, the treating provider completed a second survey to evaluate changes in differential and management. The primary outcome was change in the most likely diagnosis and was assessed for non-inferiority between primary and US team performed POCUS using an a priori specified non-inferiority margin of 20%. Secondary outcomes included change in number of diagnoses considered, change in confidence in diagnosis assessed on a Likert-like scale, and change in interventions. We enrolled physicians evaluating 156 patients presenting with undifferentiated dyspnea at a university affiliated ED or a community hospital ED. In 40% (95% CI, 28 - 52%) of studies performed by the primary team the most likely diagnosis changed compared to 32% (95% CI, 22 - 41%) for studies performed by the US team. This was declared non-inferior using a margin of 20% (p < .0001). Post-POCUS differentials decreased by a mean 1.8 diagnoses and this change was equivalent within a margin of 0.5 diagnoses between primary and US team performed studies (p = 0.034). Secondary outcomes were also notable for a modest change in any management being considered (34% primary team vs 32% US team), an increase in post-POCUS confidence in diagnosis (0.7 vs 0.6-point increase), and 3 cases of cardiac tamponade were found when COPD or CHF was the initial suspected diagnosis. POCUS performed both by the primary team and a dedicated US team resulted in a significant narrowing of the differential diagnosis, a change in the primary diagnosis and an increase in confidence of diagnosis. The change in primary diagnosis was non-inferior when comparing primary to US team performed studies and the two groups were equivalent when considering change in confidence in diagnosis as well as mean reduction in number of diagnoses. There was also no significant difference in effect between performing sites. POCUS is a valuable tool for limiting the cognitive burden in the initial evaluation of undifferentiated dyspneic ED patients when performed in a targeted fashion.
Read full abstract