Prevention Of Bloodstream Infections Research Articles

Nursing practice of guidelines for prevention and control of vascular Catheter-Related bloodstream infections.

To apply the Ottawa Model of Research Use to translate the Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Vascular Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections. The Ottawa model of research use is used to provide a framework and guidance. This study was organized by the Nursing Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Engineering University, and the Intravenous Therapy Group was responsible for the implementation of the study. The hospital's intravenous therapy administrators, members of the sedation team, and specialist nurses will be organized to evaluate the importance, exactness, and clinical practicability of 34 entries. Twelve clinical departments and IV therapy clinics with a high number of central venous catheters were used as sites for translating evidence from this project. The evidence-based team assessed the practice environment, potential practitioners, and clinical status of clinical translation of evidence through symposia, review of relevant systems, operational procedures, on-site inspections, and questionnaires. They compare evidence with existing processes and decide on change strategies. Before and after the application of the evidence, there was a significant increase in the knowledge, belief, and behavior of healthcare workers on CLABSI prevention and control, especially in the acquisition of related knowledge (χ2 = 26.648 p < 0.001). The associated implementation rate was also significantly improved, with a significant decrease in CLABSI incidence from 0.29 per 1000 to 0.11 per 1000 (χ2 = 8.625 p = 0.004). The assessment of the integration of issues showed that 8 aspects, including workflow, knowledge mastery, monitoring reports, and aseptic operations, do not meet the qualified standards. Through this clinical change, a perfect prevention and control system has been established, and the level of knowledge, belief, and behavior of medical staff in preventing CLABSI has been improved, while the incidence of CLABSI has been reduced.

Improving central venous catheter care with chlorhexidine gluconate dressings: evidence from a systematic review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundThe prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) is a critical priority in the clinical management of central venous catheters (CVCs). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate antibacterial dressings in the context of CVC care.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase et al. databases up to May 28, 2024. The search targeted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the impact of chlorhexidine gluconate antibacterial dressings on CVC-related outcomes. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsThe final analysis included 14 RCTs involving a total of 8920 patients with CVCs, with participants divided into a chlorhexidine antibacterial dressing group (n = 4731) and a control group (n = 4189). The chlorhexidine dressing group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of CRBSI compared to the control group, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–0.64, P < 0.001. The chlorhexidine dressing group also showed a significant decrease in bacterial colonization, with an RR of 0.46, 95% CI 0.38–0.55, P < 0.001. Assessment of publication bias through funnel plot asymmetry and Egger’s test revealed no significant bias in the included studies (all P > 0.05).ConclusionsThere is a notable reduction in the incidence of CRBSI and bacterial colonization in patients with CVCs through the application of chlorhexidine gluconate dressings. Given the compelling evidence, the integration of these dressings into standard nursing care protocols for the management of CVCs is advocated.

Infection prevention in home dialysis.

Among patients with kidney failure, home dialysis modalities, including peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD) provide several individual and healthcare system benefits over in-center hemodialysis (HD). Infection remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in this population, and a core outcome of critical importance to patients, caregivers, and kidney health professionals. This narrative review provides evidence-based measures for infection prevention among individuals receiving home dialysis, with a particular emphasis on dialysis and access-related infections. Patient and care partner education and training is an important and major theme for infection prevention in home dialysis. In PD, identifying and managing modifiable risk factors for infections such as hypokalemia, constipation, use of gastric acid suppressants, and domestic pets, along with the use of antimicrobial prophylaxis, when indicated, can substantially reduce peritonitis risk. Reducing the use of central venous catheters (CVC), and duration of CVC dependence is the most effective means of prevention of HD access-related bloodstream infections in individuals receiving HHD. For arteriovenous fistula cannulation, rope ladder technique is associated with lower risk of infection compared to buttonhole cannulation. Developing and instituting a well structured and evidence-based patient training and education program within home dialysis units is the most important measure in preventing and reducing dialysis and access-related infections. Kidney care providers should be familiar with different infection risk factors among individuals receiving home dialysis.

Taurolocktmhep100 versus saline 0.9% as secondary prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with chronic intestinal failure; a double-blinded, randomized study

Taurolocktmhep100 versus saline 0.9% as secondary prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients with chronic intestinal failure; a double-blinded, randomized study

Use of local treatment in managing infections: Focus on antimicrobial locks, beads, and cement.

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. The purpose of this review is to describe important considerations with local antimicrobial therapies such as locks, beads, and cement for adjunctive infection management or prevention. Local delivery of antimicrobials with locks, beads, and cement has been used for infection management with retained devices in an effort to improve clinical success. However, their use has been controversial due to conflicting clinical data and logistical issues. Antimicrobial lock therapy (ALT) has been used for both adjunctive treatment and prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections for certain pathogens and based on patient-specific scenarios. ALT has been a controversial method for sterilizing the catheter lumen by delivering high concentrations of antibiotics with or without heparin into the catheter for prolonged durations. Studies differ regarding the selection and concentrations of antibiotics, dwell duration, presence of heparin in the ALT, clinical outcomes/definitions, and use for prevention or treatment of catheter-related bloodstream infections. Antibiotic beads and cement have been used for various surgical procedures but are predominately considered in orthopedic surgeries. Despite the widespread use of the antibiotic-loaded bone cement in orthopedics, studies differ regarding the selection and concentrations of antibiotics, clinical outcomes/definitions, and use for prevention or treatment of infections. Although antimicrobial locks, beads, and cement are commonly used for adjunctive treatment or prevention of infections, more data are needed to support their use to provide clinical efficacy and safety with consistent antimicrobial selection and logistics.

Assessment of the Level of Awareness and Degree of Implementation of Central Line Bundles for Prevention of Central Line-associated Blood Stream Infection: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study.

The objective of this study was to assess the extent of knowledge and application of central line bundles in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital for the purpose of avoiding central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). This assessment was conducted through the use of a questionnaire. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the ICU, involving doctors and nurses. The study was observational in nature. The study employed a methodical validated questionnaire to evaluate the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice of central line bundles for the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). The questionnaire was designed using preexisting awareness surveillance systems, infection control measures, and patient care practices that were specifically relevant to CLABSIs in the ICU. The data were analyzed utilizing SPSS. The research involved a total of 93 healthcare professionals, consisting of 67 physicians and 26 nurses. The mean knowledge score among participants was 82%, with higher scores reported in individuals who had training in central line bundles. Healthcare professionals exhibited robust compliance with hand cleanliness, antiseptic skin preparation prior to insertion, aseptic draping of the patient, utilization of utmost sterile barriers, verification of central venous catheter (CVC) tip placement using chest X-ray or fluoroscopy, and preservation of a sterile environment. The study emphasized the significance of training in enhancing understanding and adherence to central line bundling protocols in ICUs. Participants exhibited a high level of knowledge and commitment to recommended practices, indicating that this training can have a favorable effect on CLABSI rates. Singh S, Sharma A, Dhawan M, Sharma SP. Assessment of the Level of Awareness and Degree of Implementation of Central Line bundles for Prevention of Central Line-associated Blood Stream Infection: A Questionnaire-based Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(9):847-853.

Distribution and antibiotic resistance analysis of Gram positive cocci in bloodstream infections in a hospital in Inner Mongolia

To investigate the strain composition and drug resistance characteristics of G+(Gram positive cocci) cocci causing bloodstream infections in the People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region in recent years and provide a basis for the empirical and rational use of drugs for the prevention and treatment of bloodstream infections caused by G+cocci. The strain composition and drug-resistant characteristics of G+cocci isolated from positive blood culture specimens sent to various departments of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and the higher detection rates of Staphylococcus hominis and Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were examined. MRSA and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) were comparatively analyzed for resistance. The resistance data were analyzed by Whonet 5.6 statistical software, the significance of difference was analyzed by SPSS 22.0 software, and the resistance rate was compared by χ2 test. The results showed that 1 209 strains of G+cocci, in terms of the composition ratio, from high to low, were mainly human staphylococci (32.5%,393/1 209), Staphylococcus epidermidis (27.8%, 336/1 209), Staphylococcus aureus (14.9%,180/1 209) and Enterococcus faecalis (10.6%, 128/1 209). Among them, the detection rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (42.8%, 77/180) was lower than that of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcus (MRCNS) (71.5%, 608/850); and among enterococci, the detection rate of Enterococcus faecalis (71.5%, 128/179) was much higher than that of Enterococcus faecalis (28.5%, 51/179). For drug resistance, the resistance rate to five commonly used antimicrobial drugs, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin and tetracycline, was higher in Staphylococcus hominis than in Staphylococcus epidermidis (χ2=7.152-64.080, P<0.05); however, for the aminoglycoside antimicrobial drug gentamicin, the rate of resistance in Staphylococcus humanus was lower than in Staphylococcus epidermidis, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=11.895, P<0.05); no strains resistant to linezolid and vancomycin were found in both. Comparison of the resistance rates to seven antimicrobial drugs, gentamicin, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, clindamycin and tetracycline, was significantly higher in MRSA than in MSSA (χ2=6.169-56.941, P<0.05); however, the resistance rate to cotrimoxazole, MRSA (15.6%, 12/77) was significantly lower than that of MSSA (35.3%, 36/102), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.155, P<0.05); MRSA and MSSA resistant to linezolid and vancomycin were not found. The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecalis to penicillin G and ampicillin was much higher than that of Enterococcus faecalis, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=22.965, P<0.05), and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were not found. In conclusion, for staphylococci, except for individual antibiotics, S.hominis and MRSA were more resistant to most antimicrobial drugs than S. epidermidis and MSSA, showing a multidrug-resistant pattern. For enterococci, except for penicillin G and ampicillin resistance rate, Enterococcus faecalis is much higher than Enterococcus faecalis, the rest of the antimicrobial drugs did not see a significant difference, in addition to vancomycin-resistant enterococci were not detected. Clinicians should pay great attention to the monitoring data of multidrug-resistant G+cocci isolated from blood cultures to provide a basis for empirical and rational use of drugs in the clinic, to effectively prevent and reduce the incidence of bloodstream infections caused by G+cocci.

The CATERPILLAR study: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing a taurolidine–citrate–heparin lock solution to a heparin-only lock solution for the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections in paediatric oncology patients

Taurolidine-citrate(-heparin) lock solutions (TCHL) are suggested as a promising and safe method for the prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI). To investigate the efficacy of TCHL for the prevention of CLABSI in paediatric oncology patients. An assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial at the Princess Máxima Centre for paediatric oncology, the Netherlands, was performed from 2020 to 2023. Paediatric oncology patients receiving a tunnelled central venous access device (CVAD) were eligible. A total of 462 patients were required to compare the TCHL to the heparin-only lock (HL). Patients were followed-up for the first 90 days after CVAD insertion. The primary outcome was the incidence of the first CLABSI from CVAD insertion until the end of follow-up. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. In total, 232 were randomized in the HL and 231 in the TCHL group. A total of 47 CLABSIs were observed. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that a CLABSI was observed in 26 (11.2%) of the HL group patients versus 21 (9.1%) of the TCHL group patients; incidence rate ratio (IRR) of 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46-1.45) in favour of the TCHL group. The per-protocol analysis showed that a CLABSI was observed in 10 (7.9%) of the HL group patients versus 6 (4.8%) of the TCHL group patients; IRR of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.21-1.62) in favour of the TCHL group. Adverse events were more common in the TCHL group but rarely reported. No difference was detected between the TCHL and HL in the incidence of CLABSI in paediatric oncology patients.

Implementing nasal povidone-iodine decolonization to reduce infections in hemodialysis units: a qualitative assessment.

A substantial proportion of patients undergoing hemodialysis carry Staphylococcus aureus in their noses, and carriers are at increased risk of S. aureus bloodstream infections. Our pragmatic clinical trial implemented nasal povidone-iodine (PVI) decolonization for the prevention of bloodstream infections in the novel setting of hemodialysis units. We aimed to identify pragmatic strategies for implementing PVI decolonization among patients in outpatient hemodialysis units. Qualitative descriptive study. Outpatient hemodialysis units affiliated with five US academic medical centers. Units varied in size, patient demographics, and geographic location. Sixty-six interviewees including nurses, hemodialysis technicians, research coordinators, and other personnel. We conducted interviews with personnel affiliated with all five academic medical centers and conducted thematic analysis of transcripts. Hemodialysis units had varied success with patient recruitment, but interviewees reported that patients and healthcare personnel (HCP) found PVI decolonization acceptable and feasible. Leadership support, HCP engagement, and tailored patient-focused tools or strategies facilitated patient engagement and PVI implementation. Interviewees reported both patients and HCP sometimes underestimated patients' infection risks and experienced infection-prevention fatigue. Other HCP barriers included limited staffing and poor staff engagement. Patient barriers included high health burdens, language barriers, memory issues, and lack of social support. Our qualitative study suggests that PVI decolonization would be acceptable to patients and clinical personnel, and implementation is feasible for outpatient hemodialysis units. Hemodialysis units could facilitate implementation by engaging unit leaders, patients and personnel, and developing education for patients about their infection risk.

When Infections Are Found: A Qualitative Study Characterizing Best Management Practices for Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection and Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Performance Monitoring and Feedback.

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) remain a significant patient safety problem that can lead to illness and death, despite the implementation of clinical bundles to prevent HAIs. Management practices can support HAI prevention, but their role in HAI performance monitoring and feedback is not well understood. To address this knowledge gap, we previously conducted semi-structured interviews with staff at 18 hospitals to examine the role of management practices around the prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). Interview transcripts were analyzed to identify themes related to HAI performance monitoring and feedback. The current analysis focuses on 10 higher-performing hospitals that were successful in preventing CLABSIs and CAUTIs. These institutions had robust practices including timely event analysis, leadership engagement, and multidisciplinary participation in HAI reviews. Across these sites, we found common goals including investigating HAIs without blame and identifying opportunities for improvement. Management practices such as timely analysis of HAIs, collaboration between facility leadership and multidisciplinary team members, and a focus on identifying the failure of a procedure or protocol, rather than the failure of staff members, are all approaches that can support infection prevention efforts. These management practices may be especially important as hospitals attempt to address increases in CLABSI and CAUTI rates that may have occurred during the coronavirus pandemic.

Implementatie van de Infectierisicoscan in een ziekenhuisnetwerk door het Hospital Outbreak Support Team

Implementation of the Infection Risk Scan in a hospital network by the Hospital Outbreak Support Team The Infection Risk Scan (IRIS) assesses the quality of infection prevention and control (IPC) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in a hospital ward by the standardized measurement of a broad range of quality indicators. IRIS was implemented in the geriatric wards of the 4 hospitals of the Plexus healthcare network ‘Oost-Vlaams-Brabant’ (Belgium). The goal was to compare the IPC and AMS policies of the hospitals in order to define common improvement strategies within the Hospital Outbreak Support Team (HOST), a federal project concerning IPC and AMS. In the first part of IRIS, the risk profile of the patient population is determined by a point prevalence measurement of 4 variables. In the second part, the improvement plot is created based on the measurement of 7 quality indicators. Improvement actions can be deduced from quality indicators with higher improvement potentials. The risk profiles of the 4 hospitals were highly comparable and the improvement plots showed an intermediate to high improvement potential for the use of AMT and hand hygiene compliance. There were important differences in the appropriate use of transurethral and intravascular catheters, with 2 hospitals having a low and 2 hospitals having a high improvement potential. IRIS was a useful tool in the early phase of the HOST project to benchmark the IPC and AMT policies between the Plexus hospitals and to decide what future projects could be collaborated on. As a result of IRIS, it was decided to define common care bundles for the prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract and blood stream infections and to determine hospital-specific actions with regard to the optimisation of AMS.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infection

Purpose: Despite guidelines on the prevention of central venous line-associated bloodstream infection, it is left to the clinical judgment of the attending physician to determine the risk of infection and how long a central line should remain in place. This study aimed to identify risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC)-associated infection.Methods: This retrospective study included 1,136 patients with a PICC who were hospitalized at the National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital (January 2015 to January 2022). Electronic medical records were reviewed for patients with positive blood cultures. Patients with suspicion of infection at the PICC insertion site or with unclear infection at other sites were defined as having a PICC-associated infection.Results: Thirty-five patients (3.08%) had a PICC-associated infection. There were significant differences in hypertension (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.026), lung disease (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.001), PICC duration &gt; 14 days, and antibiotic use before PICC insertion (&lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.016) between no PICC-associated infection, and infection in the bloodstream. Total parenteral nutrition with PICC was not significantly different between groups. Logistic regression analysis identified hypertension, lung disease, PICC duration &gt; 14 days (OR 2.088, 95% CI 1.032-4.224, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.041), and antibiotic use before PICC insertion (OR 0.159, 95% CI 0.049-0.515, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.002) as independent risk factors for PICC-associated infection.Conclusion: The study suggested that PICCs maintained longer than 14 days is a risk factor for PICC-associated infection. Antibiotic use prior to PICC insertion was observed as a negative factor for PICC-associated infection.

A Pre-Experimental Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme in Terms of Knowledge Regarding Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection (CLABSI) Prevention Among Nursing Officers Working in the Selected Hospital of Delhi NCR

A Pre-Experimental Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Structured Teaching Programme in Terms of Knowledge Regarding Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection (CLABSI) Prevention Among Nursing Officers Working in the Selected Hospital of Delhi NCR

Prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infections and care of central venous catheter (CVC)

To address the spread of pathogenic agents and minimize the risk of infection, it is essential to apply measures for proper antiseptic treatment of the surgical site prior to an invasive medical procedure to effectively reduce the incidence of surgical site infection and associated complications. Knowledge of the concepts and standards for the use of antiseptic and disinfectant agents helps health care providers to effectively prevent the spread of infectious agents and provides a scientific basis for their rational use. Research on the mechanisms of action of antiseptics has not only scientific but also practical importance for nurses and clinicians, which is related to more effective use of these drugs in professional activities and potential development of new promising compounds and their combinations.

Species Distribution, Typical Clinical Features and Risk Factors for Poor Prognosis of Super-Elderly Patients with Bloodstream Infection in China.

Bloodstream infection (BSI) is characterized by high mortality, especially among these increasing super-elderly patients (≥85 years), and this study was conducted to understand the species distribution, typical clinical features and risk factors for poor prognosis of super-elderly patients with BSI. Based on previous work, this retrospective study was performed by reviewing an ongoing prospective medical database in a comprehensive tertiary center in China, and all super-elderly patients with BSI in the past 6 years were enrolled in this study. Out of 5944 adult-patients with BSI, there were totally 431 super-elderly patients (≥85 years old) enrolled in this study and age ≥90 years accounted for 31.1% (134/431). Among these 431 super-elderly patients with BSI, 40 patients (9.3%) were diagnosed with BSI and the remained 401 super-elderly patients (90.7%) were defined as hospital-acquired BSI. The typical feature of these super-elderly patients with BSI was the high proportion of patients with various comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease (83.8%), ischemic cerebrovascular disease (63.3%) and pulmonary infection (61.0%). The other typical feature was that most (60.1%) of these patients had been hospitalized for long time (≥28 days) prior to the onset of BSI, and most patients had received various invasive treatments, such as indwelling central venous catheter (53.1%) and indwelling urinary catheter (47.1%). Unfortunately, due to these adverse features above, both the 7-day short-term mortality (13.2%, 57/431) and the 30-day long-term mortality (24.8%, 107/431) were high. The multivariate analysis showed that both chronic liver failure (OR 7.9, 95% CI 2.3-27.8, P=0.001) and indwelling urinary catheter (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.7, P=0.023) were independent risk factors for 7-day short-term mortality, but not for 30-day long-term mortality. In addition, the microbiology results showed that the most common species were associated with nosocomial infection or self-opportunistic infection, such as Staphylococcus hominis (18.3%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (11.8%), Escherichia coli (9.7%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (9.3%) and Candida albicans (8.6%, fungi). Super-elderly patients with BSI had typical features, regardless of the pathogenic species distribution and their drug resistance, or clinical features and their risk factors for poor prognosis. These typical features deserved attention and could be used for the prevention and treatment of BSI among super-elderly patients.

Disinfection of central venous access device needleless connectors: A human factors analysis.

Evidence-based central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention guidelines recommend the use of an antiseptic scrub to disinfect needleless connectors before device access. Guideline noncompliance may render disinfection ineffective. The goal of this study was to observe needleless-connector disinfection practices and to identify perceived facilitators and barriers to best practices of needleless-connector access. A human factors mixed-methods study involving nursing focus groups of perceived barriers and facilitators and clinical observations of compliance with instructions and protocols for use of 3.15% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol (CHG/IPA) and 70% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) antisepsis products for central venous access device (CVAD) needleless-connector disinfection was conducted in intensive care units (ICUs) at 2 academic medical centers. Access to the antiseptic product and lesser workload were identified as best-practice facilitators. Barriers were the time required per needleless-connector access and knowledge deficits. Of the 48 observed access events, 77% resulted in needleless-connector disinfection. The observed mean needleless-connector scrubbing times when using IPA were substantially below the recommended time. Drying time after product use was negligible. Lack of access to the disinfection product, emergency situations, and high workload were barriers to needleless-connector disinfection. Observed scrubbing and drying times were shorter than recommended, especially for IPA wipes. These needleless-connector disinfection deficits may increase the risk of CLABSI. Ongoing education and periodic competency evaluation of needleless-connector disinfection, improvement of supply management, and staffing workload are required to imbed and sustain best practices. Further study involving a larger sample size in diverse patient populations is warranted.

Factors associated with the disinfection of devices attached to peripheral intravenous catheters performed by the nursing team in pediatric units.

Peripheral intravenous catheterization, as well as drug administration through it, represents one of the most performed procedures by the Nursing team and, for that, precautions need to be adopted to offer harm-free care. To verify the association of Nursing professionals' work shift and training time with proper disinfection of intravenous catheter devices in pediatric units. A cross-sectional and analytical study conducted between June and August 2021 in three hospitalization units of a Pediatric Hospital. The inclusion criterion was drug administration via peripheral intravenous catheters performed by Nursing professionals. The data were analyzed according to inferential statistics, adopting p ≤ .05 as significance level. There were a total of 385 observations of drug administration procedures. The device was not disinfected in 60.3% of the cases, there was no friction at the suitable time in 86.3%, and the disinfectant was not allowed to dry in 72.5%. The work shift exerted no influence on performance of the disinfection procedure (p = .376). However, longer training time was associated with a lower rate in performing such procedure (p < .001). Performing friction below the recommended time can cause a false sense of prevention of catheter-associated bloodstream infection; therefore, training sessions and strategies for adherence to the disinfection procedures should be considered, mainly for professionals with more training time.

Prevention of Catheter-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Hemodialysis Patients

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of preventive measures against catheter-associated bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients. Seventy patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment at our hospital from January 2020 to January 2023 were recruited and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either conventional nursing (control group) or targeted preventive nursing (observation group), with 35 cases in each group. Outcome measures for nursing effects assessment included nursing outcomes, the incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections, patient stress, and quality of life. Targeted preventive nursing demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection and adverse catheter events compared to conventional care (P &lt;0.05). Moreover, targeted preventive nursing significantly reduced catheter retention duration in comparison to conventional care (P &lt;0.05). The higher quality of nursing associated with targeted preventive nursing was evident in the elevated nursing quality scores (P &lt;0.05). Patients who underwent targeted preventive nursing exhibited milder stress compared to those receiving routine care, as indicated by lower hemodialysis stress scale (HSS) scores (P &lt;0.05). Furthermore, the observation group, receiving targeted preventive nursing, reported higherWorld Health Organization quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) scores than the control group, suggesting an improved quality of life (P &lt;0.05). Targeted preventive care for catheter-associated bloodstream infections in hemodialysis patients not only fortifies the rigor and standard of care but also effectively reduces the infection rate, shortens catheter retention time, alleviates patient stress, and enhances their overall quality of care and survival.

Vascular Access Team Central Line Dressing Changes to Reduce Infection Risk: A Focused Two-Person Approach in High-Risk Patients.

Due to low compliance by bedside nursing with a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention bundle and increased CLABSI rates, a mandatory re-education initiative at a 1200-bed university-affiliated hospital was undertaken. Despite this, 2 units, housing high-risk immunocompromised patients, continued to experience increased CLABSI rates. A quality improvement before-after project design in these units replaced bedside nursing staff with 2 nurses from the vascular access team (VAT) to perform central vascular access device (CVAD) dressing changes routinely every 7 days or earlier if needed. The VAT consistently followed the bundled components, including use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated dressings on all patients unless an allergy was identified. In this case, a non-CHG transparent semipermeable membrane dressing was used. There were 884 patients with 14 211 CVAD days in the preimplementation period and 1136 patients with 14 225 CVAD days during the postimplementation period. The VAT saw 602 (53.0%) of the 1136 patients, performing at least 1 dressing change in 98% of the patients (n = 589). The combined CLABSI rate for the 2 units decreased from 2.53 per 1000 CVAD days preintervention to 1.62 per 1000 CVAD days postintervention. The estimated incidence rate ratio (IRR) for the intervention was 0.639, a 36.1% reduction in monthly CLABSI rates during the postimplementation period.

Preparation of Patients for Central Venous Catheter Care in the Home: Perspectives From Health Care Personnel.

Patients managing central venous catheters (CVCs) outside of hospitals need training in CVC care. Using 3 focus groups, the study identified themes in how health care personnel (HCP) prepare patients and their caregivers for CVC care at home. Four major themes and 25 nested subthemes were identified: (1) providing the right amount of education at the right time, (2) tailoring education to patient needs, (3) developing patient education tools, and (4) managing differences in recommendations to patients. HCPs in the study ensured patients and caregivers learn what they need to know when they need to know it, using appropriate patient education tools. Patients and caregivers are largely responsible for CVC care and central line-associated bloodstream infection prevention outside of acute care hospitals and long-term care settings, and HCP take seriously their obligation to provide them with appropriate education and tools to best enhance their ability to keep themselves safe.