Prevalence Of Treatment-resistant Depression Research Articles

Prevalence of Treatment Resistant Depression: TRAL study sub analysis in a Mexican sample

Introduction: Epidemiology and burden of disease in LatAm is often scarce in psychiatric disorders. This is particularly relevant in Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD), a burdensome condition in a significant proportion of Major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. The Treatment Resistant Depression in America Latina (TRAL) study set out to characterize the epidemiology and burden of TRD in MDD patients. This manuscript presents this characterization for the Mexico subset based on data from the TRAL study. Methods: A sample of 697 adult patients clinically diagnosed with MDD were recruited from 14 Mexican sites. Patients with relevant psychiatric comorbidities or enrolled in a clinical trial were excluded. Outcomes were mainly patient reported outcomes and assessment scales. Results: Prevalence of TRD in Mexico was 20.7%. Current suicidality is high in TRD patients (20.8%), as well as suicide behavior disorder (12.5%). SSRIs and SNRIs were the most common medications. Results from EQ-5D, SDS and WPAI show significant limitations for TRD patients in their everyday life. Discussion: Current results are aligned with available literature on treatment and prevalence of suicidality and suicide behavior disorder. The prevalence of TRD in MDD patients is high and presents a management challenge. Conclusions: The burden of TRD in Mexico is significant, although less severe than in other LatAm countries. Public health policies should improve diagnosis and availability of novel more efficacious therapies.

Major depressive disorder and treatment-resistant depression: an epidemiological analysis in Argentina of the Study of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Latin America

Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) prevalence varies considerable between regions and epidemiology of TRD in Argentina is lacking. Based on the Treatment-Resistant Depression in America Latina (TRAL) study, epidemiology and burden of TRD in MDD patients from Argentina is reported in this paper. A sample of adult MDD patients (n=396) from 5 sites in Argentina, with clinical diagnosis were included. Patients with psychosis, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, with severe chemical dependence or currently participating in another clinical trial were excluded. Patient reported outcomes and clinical assessment scales were used as outcomes. The prevalence of TRD in MDD patients in Argentina is 33.2%, based on TRAL data. Patients in TRD are older compared to those without TRD, and was more evident in married/consensual union MDD patients. Higher suicidality, greater comorbidity based on MINI, and worse scores in MADRS and PHQ-9 were identified in TRD patients. The prevalence identified in TRAL study for Argentina is substantial comparing with other Latin American countries and worldwide prevalence. TRD represents a disproportional burden to society, and efforts should be placed on reducing the burden of MDD and TRD in Argentina by improving early diagnosis, therapeutic management and ensuring that all patients have better access to mental healthcare.

Epidemiology of Treatment-Resistant Depression in the United States.

Background: The prevalence of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) among patients with pharmaceutically treated depression (PTD) varies greatly in publications. The aim of this study is to estimate the prevalence of TRD using 2 large claims databases in the US.Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the Humana and Optum databases. Patients aged ≥ 18 years who had at least 1 diagnosis of major depressive disorder (ICD-10-CM codes: F32.xx, F33.xx) and 1 antidepressant prescription filled in 2018 were identified as having PTD. Among patients with PTD, TRD was defined as experiencing failure of treatment with at least 2 antidepressants with ≥ 4 weeks of adequate treatment. We estimated the age- and gender-standardized prevalence of TRD and then used logistic regression to investigate if TRD risk varies by age, sex, race, and geographic region. Finally, we described the timeline of TRD development in incident PTD patients.Results: We identified 296,055 and 277,941 patients with PTD in the Humana and Optum databases, among whom 17,640 (6.0%) and 16,131 (5.8%) had TRD. After age and sex standardization, TRD prevalence among PTD patients was 6.8% in Humana vs 5.8% in Optum. Females, middle-aged adults, and White patients had higher risk of TRD. The median time from index antidepressant use to TRD was about 6 months in incident PTD patients.Conclusions: The prevalence of TRD among patients with PTD was similar in the 2 databases. TRD prevalence varies by sex, race, and age, with a higher prevalence in females, White patients, and those in the age group of 45-64 years. However, the absolute differences were small.

A piece of the puzzle: Does bipolarity partly explain the high prevalence of treatment resistance in depression?

In this cross-sectional study we examined whether the prevalence of treatment resistant depression (TRD) can be partly attributed to level of bipolarity. We included data of 201 patients with either episodic depression or TRD, who received treatment for their depression at either an outpatient or 2nd opinion/daytime setting, within a specialised mental healthcare department in the Netherlands. Whether level of TRD, assessed by the ‘Dutch Measure for quantification of Treatment Resistance in Depression’, can be partly explained by level of bipolarity, assessed by ‘the Bipolarity Index’, was examined using linear regression.We found no direct association between level of TRD and level of bipolarity, nor did comorbid anxiety disorders obscure an existing association.In this study we found no evidence for overlooked bipolarity contributing to the high prevalence of TRD. If replicated, we could state that additional screening on bipolarity with an instrument such as the ‘Bipolarity Index’ in the specialised mental health care is unnecessary.

Treatment resistant depression incidence and prevalence using the French nationwide claims database.

To estimate annual incidence and prevalence of Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) in France. We identified all adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a TRD episode between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2014 in the EGB (Échantillon généraliste des bénéficiaires), a permanent random sample of the French nationwide claims database. After a 6-month washout period without hospitalization for depression or any antidepressants (AD), and after exclusion of psychotic or bipolar affective disorders, Parkinson's disease and dementia, a TRD episode was defined by three successive sequences of different AD over a 3-month treatment period (6 months for a sensitive analysis), with at least 3 weeks before each sequence change and a Medication Possession Ratio ≥ 80%; or by the dispensing of >two different AD together; or of an AD with a potentiator (lithium, antiepileptic drugs, antipsychotic drugs, thyroid hormones) over the same treatment period. The annual incidence rate was estimated from 2012 to 2014 and the prevalence using a Gamma parametric function based on treatment duration and a 30-year prediction. Between 2012 and 2014, 700 patients were identified in EGB with a TRD episode. The mean age was 47.4 years (±15.3); 52.7% were women. Annual incidence and prevalence of TRD were estimated at 5.8 and 25.8 per 10 000 patients, respectively and at 7.8 and 37.6 per 10 000 patients, respectively in the sensitivity analysis. This study provides the first population-based estimates for incidence and prevalence of TRD in France.

Current clinical practice of electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in psychiatry, a German sample

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the current clinical practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in German psychiatry. Case-based data (> 1.000.000 cases) were collected according to §21 of the German hospital remuneration law from January 2015 to December 2017. The study cohort comprises approximately 35–40% of the annual psychiatric cases and hospitals in Germany. Frequency of ECT and rTMS cases were investigated considering main diagnoses according to ICD-10 and treatment settings (inpatient vs. day-care). ECT cases with short-term hospitalization (≤ 4 days) were supposed to be maintenance ECT cases. A linear regression analysis was conducted to estimate trends in the use of ECT and rTMS. Different groups were compared using Chi-square tests. ECT and rTMS cases appear to increase in total during the observation period possibly due to facilities newly introducing ECT and rTMS but also to increased frequency of treatments. Both treatments were rarely performed in day-care settings (0.89% and 11.25%). ECT was performed in 1.72% of all cases with affective disorders and in 1.48% with major depressions, respectively. Age ≥ 65 years, females, severe and psychotic depression were significantly associated with a higher rate of ECT cases. > 40% of all ECT cases were possibly maintenance ECT cases. Only 0.60% of these were performed in day- care settings. rTMS was primarily performed in major depression (86,7% of all rTMS cases). This study suggests a growing demand for ECT and rTMS. Nevertheless, the use of ECT is still low compared to the high prevalence of treatment resistant depression. The use of rTMS is even lower and seems to be restricted to specialized institutions. Maintenance ECT is frequently carried out in an inpatient setting. Limitations of this study are the case- and group-based analysis, missing data on outpatient services and treatment sessions per case. Therefore, the database is not necessarily representative for the entire German healthcare system. Further studies are needed to verify the presented findings and should address the feasibility of ambulatory and day-care ECT services.

UPDATE ON ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY IN GERIATRIC DEPRESSION: Session 300

Dr. McCall will review the data on the improvement in quality of life after treatment with ECT supporting the relationship of ECT treatment with significant improvements in mental health of older adults with severe recurrent depression. Dr. Petrides will summarize the data from the CORE group which over several decades has provided a roadmap to increasing the efficacy of ECT while minimizing cognitive side effects and preventing relapse. Dr. Hermida will discuss the use of ultrabrief right unilateral ECT (UB RUL), a form of ECT that may be particularly beneficial in the elderly due to the decreased cognitive side effects. She will review a case study of 100 patients treated with UB RUL who were diagnosed with psychotic depression and catatonia. Dr. Kellner will conclude with a discussion of the use of ECT in the United States. He will review the status of the use (actually underuse) of ECT in the United States. Recent data on the number of procedures performed, demographics of ECT patients, health economic impact of ECT, and details of how ECT is administered (technique, setting, practitioner information) will be covered. Given the suicide epidemic and the increased prevalence of treatment resistant depression, ECT remains a vital treatment for severe mood and psychotic disorders. Newer data suggest increased use of ECT could lead to improved public health outcomes.

Cognitive and volumetric predictors of response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) — A prospective follow-up study

As the prevalence of treatment resistant depression (TRD) continues to rise, it remains a clinically important issue to identify neurobiological-, patient- and treatment-related factors that could potentially predict response to treatment. Medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures, in particular the hippocampus and amygdala have been implicated in inferior treatment response. The role of related structures such as the entorhinal cortex and the impact of MTL abnormalities on neurocognitive function, however, have not been systematically examined. The current study investigated MTL abnormalities and neurocognitive characteristics of eventual treatment responders and non-responders to a course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in order to identify potential predictors of treatment outcome. Prior to rTMS treatment all patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and neuropsychological assessment. MRI analysis was conducted using FreeSurfer 5.0. There was a 50% response rate following up to a 6-week course of daily rTMS treatments. Treatment response was defined as 50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and BDI-II scores from baseline. There was no difference in pre-treatment neurocognitive profiles and MTL volumes between eventual treatment responders and non-responders. Smaller pre-treatment left hippocampus volume showed a trend towards predicting eventual subjective improvement in depressive symptomatology. Although preliminary, our findings suggest that structural abnormalities may have some potential for predicting outcome to rTMS.