Event Abstract Back to Event Interactions between top-down and stimulus-driven processes in visual feature integration Marc Schipper1*, Udo Ernst2, Klaus Pawelzik2 and Manfred Fahle1 1 Bremen University, Department for Human Neurobiology, Center for Cognitive Sciences, Germany 2 Bremen University, Department for Theoretical Physics, Center for Cognitive Sciences, Germany Perception of visual scenes requires the brain to link local image features into global contexts. Contour integration is such an example grouping colinearily aligned edge elements to form coherent percepts. Theoretical and modeling studies demonstrated that purely stimulus-driven mechanisms, as implemented by feedforward or recurrent network architectures, are well suited to explain this cognitive function. However, recent empirical work showed that top-down attention can strongly modulate contour integration. By combining psychophysical with electrophysiological methods, we studied how strongly prior expectations shape contour integration. These empirical techniques were complemented by model simulations to uncover the putative neural substrates and mechanisms underlying contour integration.Subjects participated in two experiments with identical visual stimuli but different behavioural tasks: a detection task (A) and a discrimination task (B). Stimuli consisted of vertical or horizontal ellipses formed by colinearily aligned Gabor elements embedded in a field of Gabors with random orientations and positions. Each hemifield could contain either (i) one vertical, (ii) one horizontal, or (iii) no ellipse. All combinations of these three basic configurations were possible, resulting in nine stimulus categories. In experiment A participants replied ‘yes’ whenever one stimulus contained at least one ellipse, in experiment B observers replied ‘yes’ only when a target was present (either a horizontal or vertical ellipse).The psychophysical data demonstrate a pronounced influence of higher cognitive processes on contour integration: In the discrimination task, reaction times (RT) are consistently shorter for targets than for distractors. The presence of redundant targets (e.g. two horizontal ellipses instead of only one horizontal ellipse) also shortens RTs. These first two effects were consistent with our expectations. Moreover we discovered an additional bias in RT for horizontal ellipses (~70 ms shorter than for vertical ellipses).In EEG recordings, we find pronounced differences in event-related potentials (ERPs) between stimulations with versus without the presence of contours. These differences appear at about 110-160 ms after stimulus onset in the occipital regions of the cortex. In the same regions the evoked potentials were substantially modulated by the number of contours present (~140 ms after stimulus onset) and depending on the behavioural task (~230 ms after stimulus onset). Psychophysical and electrophysiological results are qualitatively consistent: The larger the RT differences, the more dissimilar are ERPs in occipital regions. Moreover, phenomenological modeling reveals that the horizontal bias and task-induced effects either constructively or destructively combine in a multiplicative way. This may lead to much lower RTs when e.g. a horizontal bias combines with a horizontal target, or to a mutual cancellation of the different RT effects when e.g. a horizontal bias combines with a vertical target. Acknowledgments:This work was supported by the BMBF as part of the National Bernstein Network for Computational Neuroscience. Conference: Bernstein Conference on Computational Neuroscience, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 30 Sep - 2 Oct, 2009. Presentation Type: Oral Presentation Topic: Sensory processing Citation: Schipper M, Ernst U, Pawelzik K and Fahle M (2009). Interactions between top-down and stimulus-driven processes in visual feature integration. Front. Comput. Neurosci. Conference Abstract: Bernstein Conference on Computational Neuroscience. doi: 10.3389/conf.neuro.10.2009.14.158 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 28 Aug 2009; Published Online: 28 Aug 2009. * Correspondence: Marc Schipper, Bremen University, Department for Human Neurobiology, Center for Cognitive Sciences, Bremen, Germany, schipper.marc@gmail.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Marc Schipper Udo Ernst Klaus Pawelzik Manfred Fahle Google Marc Schipper Udo Ernst Klaus Pawelzik Manfred Fahle Google Scholar Marc Schipper Udo Ernst Klaus Pawelzik Manfred Fahle PubMed Marc Schipper Udo Ernst Klaus Pawelzik Manfred Fahle Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Read full abstract