BackgroundTransient ischemic diltation (TID) in CAD predicts both high risk coronary artery anatomy and adverse prognosis. Currently no formal definition exists for TID. Aims of this study were to summarize the diagnostic and prognostic value of TID in detection of CAD severity & prediction of future cardiac outcomes.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases for published studies to June 2014. Two reviewers assessed eligibility based on predetermined criteria. For all studies TID ratio, sensitivity (SENS), and specificity (SPEC) for diagnosis of severe CAD (angiographic gold standard) were recorded. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy was performed with QUADAS 2.ResultsWe reviewed 525 papers, 30 were included; total = 11,056 patients. TID ratios were 1.13 - 1.19 for Tc-based studies, 1.14 - 1.19 for Tl studies, and 1.22 - 1.38 for dual isotope studies. SENS was 21 - 62.5%, and specificity was 77% - 95.8%. Figure demonstrates: SENS 54% (CI 40%-67%), SPEC 83% (95% CI 77%-88%). SPEC was highest for dual isotope and Tl studies and lowest for Tc-based studies. Analysis of Tc studies showed SENS = 50% (95% CI, 31-68 %) and SPEC = 82% (95% CI, 73%-80%). Assessment the prognostic value of TID showed that it had and independent & incremental prognostic value, annual cardiac event rate (5.3%-7.2%). Similarly TID in normal perfusion (with history of CAD and/or diabetes) annual cardiac event rate was (1.8%-4.9%).Conclusion BackgroundTransient ischemic diltation (TID) in CAD predicts both high risk coronary artery anatomy and adverse prognosis. Currently no formal definition exists for TID. Aims of this study were to summarize the diagnostic and prognostic value of TID in detection of CAD severity & prediction of future cardiac outcomes. Transient ischemic diltation (TID) in CAD predicts both high risk coronary artery anatomy and adverse prognosis. Currently no formal definition exists for TID. Aims of this study were to summarize the diagnostic and prognostic value of TID in detection of CAD severity & prediction of future cardiac outcomes. MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases for published studies to June 2014. Two reviewers assessed eligibility based on predetermined criteria. For all studies TID ratio, sensitivity (SENS), and specificity (SPEC) for diagnosis of severe CAD (angiographic gold standard) were recorded. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy was performed with QUADAS 2. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE databases for published studies to June 2014. Two reviewers assessed eligibility based on predetermined criteria. For all studies TID ratio, sensitivity (SENS), and specificity (SPEC) for diagnosis of severe CAD (angiographic gold standard) were recorded. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy was performed with QUADAS 2. ResultsWe reviewed 525 papers, 30 were included; total = 11,056 patients. TID ratios were 1.13 - 1.19 for Tc-based studies, 1.14 - 1.19 for Tl studies, and 1.22 - 1.38 for dual isotope studies. SENS was 21 - 62.5%, and specificity was 77% - 95.8%. Figure demonstrates: SENS 54% (CI 40%-67%), SPEC 83% (95% CI 77%-88%). SPEC was highest for dual isotope and Tl studies and lowest for Tc-based studies. Analysis of Tc studies showed SENS = 50% (95% CI, 31-68 %) and SPEC = 82% (95% CI, 73%-80%). Assessment the prognostic value of TID showed that it had and independent & incremental prognostic value, annual cardiac event rate (5.3%-7.2%). Similarly TID in normal perfusion (with history of CAD and/or diabetes) annual cardiac event rate was (1.8%-4.9%). We reviewed 525 papers, 30 were included; total = 11,056 patients. TID ratios were 1.13 - 1.19 for Tc-based studies, 1.14 - 1.19 for Tl studies, and 1.22 - 1.38 for dual isotope studies. SENS was 21 - 62.5%, and specificity was 77% - 95.8%. Figure demonstrates: SENS 54% (CI 40%-67%), SPEC 83% (95% CI 77%-88%). SPEC was highest for dual isotope and Tl studies and lowest for Tc-based studies. Analysis of Tc studies showed SENS = 50% (95% CI, 31-68 %) and SPEC = 82% (95% CI, 73%-80%). Assessment the prognostic value of TID showed that it had and independent & incremental prognostic value, annual cardiac event rate (5.3%-7.2%). Similarly TID in normal perfusion (with history of CAD and/or diabetes) annual cardiac event rate was (1.8%-4.9%). Conclusion
Read full abstract