Predialysis Nephrology Care Research Articles

National Trends in the Association of Race and Ethnicity With Predialysis Nephrology Care in the United States From 2005 to 2015

Predialysis nephrology care is associated with better survival among patients with end-stage kidney disease. To examine national trends in racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of predialysis nephrology care at least 1 year before dialysis initiation in the United States from 2005 to 2015. This national registry study assessed US registry data of 1 000 390 adults in the US Renal Data System who initiated maintenance dialysis treatment from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2015, in multiple cross-sectional analyses. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine national trends in racial/ethnic disparities in receipt of predialysis nephrology care with adjustments for potential confounders. Data were analyzed April 17, 2020. Race/ethnicity of the patients. Receipt of at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care as determined by clinician-based documentation on the End Stage Renal Disease Medical Evidence Report Form CMS 2728. Among 1 000 390 adults (57.2% male; 54.6% White, 27.8% Black, 14.0% Hispanic, and 3.6% Asian; mean [SD] age, 62.4 [15.6] years) who initiated maintenance dialysis in the United States from 2005 to 2015, 310 743 (31.1%) received at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care. In 2005 to 2007, compared with White adults, the adjusted odds ratio for receipt of at least 12 months of predialysis nephrology care was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.80-0.84) among Black adults, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.65-0.69) among Hispanic adults, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.89) among Asian adults; in 2014 to 2015, the adjusted odds ratio was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.74-0.78) among Black adults, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.60-0.63) among Hispanic adults, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.86-0.95) among Asian adults. In this cross-sectional study of more than 1 million US adults with end-stage kidney disease, racial and ethnic disparities in predialysis nephrology care did not substantially improve from 2005 to 2015. Study findings suggest that national strategies to address racial/ethnic disparities in predialysis nephrology care are needed.

Impact on survival of urgent dialysis initiation in patients with end-stage renal disease: a case-control study.

Outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease at urgent dialysis initiation are varied, but evidence of their long-term prognosis is limited. We aimed to characterize patients undergoing urgent dialysis initiation and analyse its effect on survival outcome. We retrospectively identified 208 patients who began haemodialysis from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2018 at our hospital. In this observational case-control study, the case group comprised patients starting urgent dialysis, and the control group comprised patients starting planned dialysis. We analysed laboratory data, sex, age, smoking history, comorbidities and presence of vascular access and nephrology care that potentially affected the outcome. Data were analysed with Kaplan-Meier curves of early and late period (3years after dialysis initiation) survival and log-rank tests and with Cox regression analysis. Median age (range) at dialysis initiation was 73 (28-90) years, with 50 (24%) patients in the urgent initiation group. Five (10%) patients in this group had vascular access at dialysis initiation, whereas 21 (42%) had not received adequate pre-dialysis nephrology care. The estimated median overall survival rates of the urgent group and planned initiation group were 42months and not reached, respectively (P = 0.0011). Multivariable analysis found urgent dialysis initiation to be an independent risk factor for survival (HR 2.36; 95% CI 1.36-4.00; P = 0.02). Survival was not significantly different between the groups for patients who continued chronic dialysis for > 3years from dialysis initiation (P = 0.1339). The prognosis of patients starting dialysis in an urgent condition was poor compared with those who started planned dialysis.

COVID-19 and Kidney Disease Disparities in the United States

Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, age, and sex-related health disparities in kidney disease are prominent in the United States. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disproportionately affected marginalized populations. Older adults, people experiencing unstable housing, racial and ethnic minorities, and immigrants are potentially at increased risk for infection and severe complications from COVID-19. The direct and societal effects of the pandemic may increase risk of incident kidney disease and lead to worse outcomes for those with kidney disease. The rapid transition to telemedicine potentially limits access to care for older adults, immigrants, and people experiencing unstable housing. The economic impact of the pandemic has had a disproportionate effect on women, minorities, and immigrants, which may limit their ability to manage kidney disease and lead to complications or kidney disease progression. We describe the impact of COVID-19 on marginalized populations and highlight how the pandemic may exacerbate existing disparities in kidney disease.

Duration of predialysis nephrological care and mortality after dialysis initiation.

The duration of predialysis nephrological care that can reduceall-cause and cardiovascularmortality after dialysis initiation has not been clarified. A total of 1117 patients who started chronic dialysis treatment from 2006 to 2015 at Osaka General Medical Center were analyzed.Independent risk factors associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortalityafter dialysis initiationand early death (death within 12months after dialysis initiation) were identified using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Moreover, the duration of predialysis nephrology care that could reduce mortality was explored using severaldifferentdefinitions ofearly referral as well as "6months" commonly used in previous studies. Of 1117 patients, 834 were referred6months before dialysis initiation.During the follow-up period (median, 34months), 324 patients diedafter dialysis initiation. Although multivariate Cox analysis did not show a favorable association betweenearly referral of"6months before dialysis initiation" and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, 20-month predialysis nephrological care was associated with better first-yearoverallsurvival after dialysis initiation (hazard ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.35-0.98; P = 0.040). More than 6months nephrological care before dialysis initiation was not early enough to reduceall-cause and cardiovascular mortality after dialysis initiation. Our results suggest that nephrology referral 20months before dialysis initiation would be necessary toreducefirst-yearoverall survivalafter dialysis initiation.

Predialysis nephrology care amongst Palestinian hemodialysis patients and its impact on initial vascular access type

Referral time for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to nephrologists and initial vascular access method are considered significant factors that impact health outcomes at the time of hemodialysis (HD) initiation. Native arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is strongly recommended as initial access. However, little is known about the referral rate among ESRD receiving HD in Palestine and its correlation with AVF creation. In Ramallah Hemodialysis Center, we investigated the pre-dialysis nephrology care and AVF usage in 156 patients. Type of access at HD initiation was temporary central venous catheter (CVC) in 114 (73%), tunneled hemodialysis catheter (TDC) in 21 (13%) and AVF in 21 (13%). Out of all participants, 120 (77%) were seen by nephrologist prior to dialysis. Of the participants who initiated dialysis with a CVC, 36 (31%) had not received prior nephrology care. All participants who initiated dialysis with functional AVF had received prior nephrology care. Patients who were not seen by a nephrologist prior to HD initiation had no chance at starting HD with AVF, whereas 17% of those who had nephrology care >12 months started with AVF. In conclusion, a relatively large percentage of Palestinian HD patients who were maintained on HD did not have any predialysis nephrology care. In addition, patients who received predialysis nephrology care were significantly more likely to start their HD through AVF whereas all those without predialysis nephrology care started through CVC. More in-depth national studies focusing on improving nephrology referral in ESRD patients are needed to increase AVF utilization.

NEPHROLOGY CARE AND MORTALITY RATES AMONG PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE IN PUERTO RICO AND THE UNITED STATES

Hispanics with incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have shown lower mortality despites their high incidence rates; However, prior research has excluded Puerto Rico (PR). This study compared mortality rates and predialysis nephrology care among Hispanics in the US, Hispanics in PR, and Whites in the US with ESRD from 2006-2015. We identified 791,443 patients using the Renal Management Information System. The primary outcome was age-adjusted 1-year mortality beginning with the 91st day following dialysis initiation. Secondary outcomes were the presence of arteriovenous fistula or graft at dialysis initiation, and receipt of predialysis nephrology care. Despite higher rates of insurance coverage, we identified substantial disparities in access to recommended nephrology care between PR and the US. In addition, the adjusted absolute difference in mortality rates was higher for PR Hispanics. This finding indicates shortcomings in quality of care for Puerto Rico with serious chronic illness and complex care needs.

Effects of Early Frequent Nephrology Care on Emergency Department Visits among Patients with End-stage Renal Disease.

In this retrospective cohort study, we examined the association between predialysis nephrology care status and emergency department (ED) events among patients with end-stage renal disease. Data pertaining to 76,702 patients who began dialysis treatment between 1999 and 2010 were obtained from the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan (NHIRD). The patients were divided into three groups based on the timing of the first nephrology care visit prior to the initiation of maintenance dialysis, and the frequency of nephrologist visits (i.e., early referral/frequent consultation, early referral/infrequent consultation, late referral). At 1-year post-dialysis initiation, a large number of the patients had experienced at least one all-cause ED visit (58%), infection-related ED visit (17%), or potentially avoidable ED visit (7%). Cox proportional hazard models revealed that patients who received early frequent care faced an 8% lower risk of all-cause ED visit (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.90–0.94), a 24% lower risk of infection-related ED visit (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.73–0.79), and a 24% lower risk of avoidable ED visit (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.71–0.81), compared with patients in the late referral group. With regard to the patients undergoing early infrequent consultations, the only marginally significant association was for infection-related ED visits. Recurrent event analysis revealed generally consistent results. Overall, these findings indicate that continuous nephrology care from early in the predialysis period could reduce the risk of ED utilization in the first year of dialysis treatment.

Predialysis Nephrology Care and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients With ESKD Initiating Dialysis

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on dialysis. Whether pre-ESKD nephrology care associates with AF is uncertain. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of older US patients (≥67 years) with Medicare A&B who initiated dialysis (1996-2013) without a prior diagnosis of AF. Patients were categorized by the duration and number of predialysis nephrology outpatient visits. Patients were followed for 1 year for a new diagnosis of AF. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression while accounting for the competing risks of kidney transplantation and death. We identified 316,067 patients with ESKD initiating dialysis between 1996 and 2013 who had no prior AF diagnosis. In this cohort, 66.9% had any pre-ESKD outpatient nephrology care, with the first outpatient nephrology visit before dialysis initiation occurring at≤6 months in 17.9%, 7 to 12 months in 9.4%, and >12 months in 39.6%. Outpatient pre-ESKD nephrology care for≤6, 7 to 12, and >12 months versus none yielded adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.89), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.86), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.83-0.87) for incident AF, respectively. Further, having 1 to 4 pre-ESKD outpatient nephrology visits, 5 to 9 visits, and≥10 visits versus none yielded adjusted cause-specific HRs of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.79-0.83), respectively. Having any predialysis nephrology care before initiation of dialysis was associated with slightly lower adjusted rates of incident AF over the first year of dialysis. The optimal timing and intensity of nephrology care to reduce the incidence of AF and other adverse health events requires further study.

Predialysis nephrology care and its impact on initial vascular access type in hemodialysis patients in Jordan.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who reach end-stage renal disease (ESRD) require early nephrology referral and appropriate vascular access. Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred access for hemodialysis (HD). Referral to nephrology of CKD patients starting HD in Jordan and its impact on AVF utilization is unknown. Patients on in-center HD in a large Jordan Ministry of Health dialysis unit were interviewed, and medical records reviewed to assess prior nephrology care and AVF use. Of 104 total patients, 93 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 50 ± 16 years, with 44% being females. The average body mass index was 25 ± 5. The cause of ESRD was diabetes mellitus in 28 (30%), hypertension in 28 (30%), and polycystic kidney disease in three (3%). Type of HD access at the initiation of dialysis was central venous catheter (CVC) in 80 (86%) and AVF in 12 (13%). Of the overall group, 50 (54%) were seen by nephrology before initiating dialysis, and of these, 39 patients (78%) were seen >1 year before HD initiation. Of the patients who initiated dialysis with a CVC, 38 (48%) had received prior nephrology care. All 12 patients who initiated dialysis with AVF had received prior nephrology care. Of the 50 patients who received nephrology care before dialysis initiation, 12 patients (24%) had started dialysis with an AVF; in patients without prior nephrology care, all were started with a CVC. In conclusion, our study suggests that a large percentage did not have nephrology care before initiating dialysis. The ones who were seen by nephrology before dialysis were significantly more likely to initiate dialysis using an AVF. A national focus on improving nephrology referral in advanced CKD may allow better utilization of AVF as the method of access at dialysis initiation.

What are the Risk Factors for One-Year Mortality in Older Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease? An Analysis of the Cleveland Clinic CKD Registry

Background: Prognostic factors after dialysis initiation among older chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are not well studied. In this study, we examined the risk factors associated with 1-year mortality after dialysis initiation among older CKD patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included 621 CKD patients from an electronic medical record based CKD registry that was linked to the United States Renal Data System data. In terms of age, they were all ≥65. We examined the associations of various demographic factors, comorbid conditions, relevant laboratory parameters, the presence of arteriovenous fistula, and inability to take care of oneself with 1-year mortality after dialysis initiation using Cox proportional hazards model. Results: In our study cohort, 224 older patients died during the first year of dialysis initiation and the estimated survival at 1 year was 65% (95% CI 62–69). After adjusting for covariates, increasing age by each year (Hazard ratio 1.04 [95% CI 1.02–1.06]), congestive heart failure (CHF; 1.57 [1.13–2.18]), an absence of AVF (3.0 [1.7–5.1]) and lack of nephrology care prior to dialysis initiation (1.93 [1.39–2.70]) were associated with increased risk of 1-year mortality. Nearly 60% of deaths were due to non-cardiovascular (CV) causes including cancer. Conclusion: Risk factors portending high 1-year mortality in older CKD patients are increasing age, CHF, an absence of AVF, and lack of pre-dialysis nephrology care. Clinicians need to be aware of non-CV risks of high mortality in these patients.

Association of Medicaid Expansion With 1-Year Mortality Among Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

The Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion may be associated with reduced mortality, but evidence to date is limited. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are a high-risk group that may be particularly affected by Medicaid expansion. To examine the association of Medicaid expansion with 1-year mortality among nonelderly patients with ESRD initiating dialysis. Difference-in-differences analysis of nonelderly patients initiating dialysis in Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states from January 2011 to March 2017. Living in a Medicaid expansion state. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes were insurance, predialysis nephrology care, and type of vascular access for hemodialysis. A total of 142 724 patients in expansion states (mean age, 50.2 years; 40.2% women) and 93 522 patients in nonexpansion states (mean age, 49.7; 42.4% women) were included. In Medicaid expansion states, 1-year mortality following dialysis initiation declined from 6.9% in the preexpansion period to 6.1% after expansion (change, -0.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.5). In nonexpansion states, mortality rates were 7.0% before expansion and 6.8% after expansion (change, -0.2 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.5 to 0.2), yielding an adjusted absolute reduction in mortality in expansion states of -0.6 percentage points (95% CI, -1.0 to -0.2). Mortality reductions were largest for black patients (-1.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.2, -0.7; P=.04 for interaction) and patients aged 19 to 44 years (-1.1 percentage points; 95% CI, -2.1 to -0.3; P=.01 for interaction). Expansion was associated with a 10.5-percentage-point (95% CI, 7.7-13.2) increase in Medicaid coverage at dialysis initiation, a -4.2-percentage-point (95% CI, -6.0 to -2.3) decrease in being uninsured, and a 2.3-percentage-point (95% CI, 0.6-4.1) increase in the presence of an arteriovenous fistula or graft. Changes in predialysis nephrology care were not significant. Among patients with ESRD initiating dialysis, living in a state that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act was associated with lower 1-year mortality. If this association is causal, further research is needed to understand what factors may have contributed to this finding.

Clinical prediction models for progression of chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney failure under pre-dialysis nephrology care: results from the Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort Study

BackgroundReliable prediction tools are needed to identify patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) at greater risk of developing end-stage kidney failure (ESKF). We developed and validated clinical prediction models (CPMs) for CKD progression to ESKF under pre-dialysis nephrology care using CKD-Japan Cohort (CKD-JAC) data.MethodsWe prospectively followed up 2034 participants with CKD, defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, aged 20–75 years for a mean of 3.15 years. We randomly divided the overall analysis set into development and validation cohorts. In the development cohort, CPMs were developed using Cox proportional hazard regression, and the goodness of fit was evaluated. In the validation cohort, discrimination and calibration of the developed CPMs were evaluated. We also validated developed CPMs in the dataset with the bootstrap method.ResultsESKF onset was observed in 206 and 216 patients in the development (20.3%) and validation (21.2%) cohorts, respectively. Goodness of fit, discrimination, and calibration were worse for a simple model including age, sex, and eGFR than for a complicated model (plus albuminuria, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, serum albumin, and hemoglobin). The mean absolute difference between the observed and predictive probabilities of ESKF onset at 3 years was lower for the complicated model than for the simple model (1.57 vs. 1.87%).ConclusionsCPMs employing readily available data could precisely predict progression to ESKF in patients with CKD stage G3a to G5. These developed CPMs may facilitate more appropriate clinical care and shared decision-making between clinicians and patients.

Functional status, pre-dialysis health and clinical outcomes among elderly dialysis patients

BackgroundElderly patients comprise the fastest growing population initiating dialysis in United States. The impact of poor functional status and pre-dialysis health status on clinical outcomes in elderly dialysis patients is not well studied.MethodsWe studied a retrospective cohort of 49,645 incident end stage renal disease patients that initiated dialysis between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008 from the United States Renal Data System with linked Medicare data covering at least 2 years prior to dialysis initiation. Using logistic regression models adjusted for pre-dialysis health status and other cofounders, we examined the impact of poor functional status as defined from form 2728 on 1-year all-cause mortality as primary outcome, type of dialysis modality (hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), and type of initial vascular access (arteriovenous access vs. central venous catheter) among hemodialysis patients as secondary outcomes.ResultsMean age was 72 ± 11 years. At dialysis initiation, 18.7% reported poor functional status, 88.9% had at least 1 pre-dialysis hospitalization, and 27.8% did not receive pre-dialysis nephrology care. In adjusted analyses, 1-year mortality was higher in patients with poor functional status (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.40–1.57). Adjusted odds of being initiated on hemodialysis than peritoneal dialysis (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–1.66) were higher in patients with poor functional status. Poor functional status decreased the adjusted odds of starting hemodialysis with arteriovenous access as compared to central venous catheter (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72–0.86).ConclusionPoor functional status in elderly patients with end stage renal disease is associated with higher odds of initiating hemodialysis; increases the risk of central venous catheter use, and is an independent predictor of 1-year mortality.

Pre-ESRD Care and Mortality in Incident ESRD Patients With Multiple Myeloma.

The relationship between mortality and pre-ESRD (end-stage renal disease) nephrology care in incident ESRD patients with multiple myeloma (MM) as the primary cause of renal failure has not been examined. Among 439,206 incident US hemodialysis patients with MM as the primary cause of ESRD (June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2009) identified using the US Renal Data System, adjusted odds ratios (OR) for reported pre-ESRD nephrology care for ESRD due to MM (n=4561) versus other causes (n=434,645) were calculated. The association of pre-ESRD nephrology care with subsequent mortality in MM-ESRD patients was examined. MM-ESRD patients were less likely to have any predialysis nephrology care in the year before initiation of dialysis (34.8% vs. 58.5%; OR=0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.43) compared with patients with ESRD due to other causes. MM-ESRD patients compared with others were more likely to have catheters on first dialysis (91.8% vs. 75.6%; OR=4.15; 95% CI, 3.54-4.86). Incident MM-ESRD patients receiving predialysis care for ≥6 months had significantly lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97 and 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96, respectively), relative to those without this care. A catheter for dialysis access was associated with a 1.6-fold increase in 1-year mortality in incident MM-ESRD (hazard ratio 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.83). MM-ESRD patients were less likely to have predialysis nephrology care and more likely to use catheters on first dialysis. However, predialysis care is independently associated with lower mortality in MM-ESRD patients. Predialysis care should be prioritized in MM patients approaching ESRD.

244 Predialysis Nephrology Care and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients with ESRD Initiating Dialysis

244 Predialysis Nephrology Care and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Older Patients with ESRD Initiating Dialysis

Early Mortality Associated with Inpatient versus Outpatient Hemodialysis Initiation in a Large Cohort of US Veterans with Incident End-Stage Renal Disease

Background: Mortality in the immediate post-hemodialysis transition period is extremely high. Many end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in the US start dialysis in an inpatient setting, but the characteristics of patients starting dialysis as inpatients, and the association of inpatient hemodialysis transition with mortality remain unclear. Methods: We examined 48,261 US veterans who transitioned to hemodialysis between October 2007 and September 2011. Associations of inpatient hemodialysis starting with all-cause mortality were examined in Cox proportional hazard models, with adjustments for demographics, comorbidities, vascular access type, pre-dialysis nephrology care and medication use, and last pre-ESRD estimated glomerular filtration rate and hemoglobin. Results: A total of 22,338 (46.3%) patients received the first hemodialysis treatment in an inpatient setting. Inpatient hemodialysis transition was associated with older age, presence of a tunneled catheter, higher comorbidity burden, and lack of pre-dialysis nephrology care. A total of 8,674 patients died (mortality rate 405/1,000 patient-years, 95% CI 397-413) during the first 6 months after transition to hemodialysis. The starting of inpatient vs. outpatient hemodialysis was associated with significantly higher crude all-cause mortality, but this association was attenuated after multivariable adjustments. Conclusions: Transition to hemodialysis in an inpatient setting is more common in older and sicker individuals, and in patients without pre-dialysis nephrology care and those who used a catheter for vascular access. Future studies are needed to determine if a higher proportion of patients could start hemodialysis treatment in outpatient clinics, through interventions targeting modifiable risk factors such as timely vascular access placement or earlier nephrology referrals.

Frequency of Early Predialysis Nephrology Care and Postdialysis Cardiovascular Events

Patients with kidney failure are at a high risk for cardiovascular events. Predialysis nephrology care has been reported to improve postdialysis survival, but its effects on postdialysis major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) have not been comprehensively studied. Observational cohort study. We used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. Adult patients who initiated maintenance dialysis therapy in 1999 to 2010 were enrolled. We created 3 subtypes of predialysis nephrology care based on the time between the first nephrology visit and the initiation of dialysis therapy: early frequent (duration≥ 6 months; at least 1 nephrology visit every 3 months), early infrequent (duration≥ 6 months,<1 nephrology visit every 3 months), and late (duration< 6 months). MACE was defined using the primary diagnosis in hospitalization records of acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, acute stroke, or sudden death. We investigated the associations of different subtypes of nephrology care with postdialysis 1-year MACEs. Among the 60,329 eligible patients, 24,477 (40.6%) had early frequent, 12,763 (21.2%) had early infrequent, and 23,089 (38.3%) had late nephrology care. Compared to the late-nephrology-care group, the early-frequent group was associated with an ∼10% lower risk for 1-year MACEs (HR of 0.89 [95% CI, 0.82-0.96] for first MACE and relative risk of 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98] for recurrent MACEs). However, the early-infrequent-care group had similar risks for MACEs as the late group (HR of 0.95 [95% CI, 0.86-1.05] for first MACE and relative risk of 0.94 [95% CI, 0.86-1.02] for recurrent MACEs). Lack of physical and biochemical information because of inherent limitations from administrative claims data. Early frequent nephrology care for 6 or more months before the initiation of long-term dialysis therapy may improve 1-year postdialysis major cardiovascular outcomes.

Predialysis nephrology care and dialysis-related health outcomes among older adults initiating dialysis.

BackgroundPredialysis nephrology care is associated with lower mortality and rates of hospitalization following chronic dialysis initiation. Whether more frequent predialysis nephrology care is associated with other favorable outcomes for older adults is not known.MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients ≥66 years who initiated chronic dialysis in 2000–2001 and were eligible for VA and/or Medicare-covered services. Nephrology visits in VA and/or Medicare during the 12-month predialysis period were identified and classified by low intensity (<3 visits), moderate intensity (3–6 visits), and high intensity (>6 visits). Outcome measures included very low estimated glomerular filtration rate, severe anemia, use of peritoneal dialysis, and receipt of permanent vascular access at dialysis initiation and death and kidney transplantation within two years of initiation. Generalized linear models with propensity score weighting were used to examine the association between nephrology care and outcomes.ResultsAmong 58,014 patients, 46 % had none, 22 % had low, 13 % had moderate, and 19 % had high intensity predialysis nephrology care. Patients with a greater intensity of predialysis nephrology care had more favorable outcomes (all p < 0.001). In adjusted models, patients with high intensity predialysis nephrology care were less likely to have severe anemia (RR = 0.70, 99 % CI: 0.65–0.74) and more likely to have permanent vascular access (RR = 3.60, 99 % CI: 3.42–3.79) at dialysis initiation, and less likely to die within two years of dialysis initiation (RR = 0.80, 99 % CI: 0.77–0.82).ConclusionIn a large cohort of older adults treated with chronic dialysis, greater intensity of predialysis nephrology care was associated with more favorable outcomes.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-016-0324-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Hemodialysis Outcomes.

Use of peripherally inserted central catheters has expanded rapidly, but the consequences for patients who eventually require hemodialysis are undefined. Our national, population-based analysis included 33,918 adult Medicare beneficiaries from the US Renal Data System who initiated hemodialysis with central venous catheters as their sole vascular access in 2010 and 2011. We used linked Medicare claims to identify peripherally inserted central catheter exposures and evaluate the associations of peripherally inserted central catheter placement with transition to working arteriovenous fistulas or grafts and patient survival using a Cox model with time-dependent variables. Among 33,918 individuals initiating hemodialysis with a catheter as sole access, 12.6% had received at least one peripherally inserted central catheter. Median follow-up was 404 days (interquartile range, 103-680 days). Among 6487 peripherally inserted central catheters placed, 3435 (53%) were placed within the 2 years before hemodialysis initiation, and 3052 (47%) were placed afterward. Multiple peripherally inserted central catheters were placed in 30% of patients exposed to peripherally inserted central catheters. Recipients of peripherally inserted central catheters were more likely to be women and have comorbid diagnoses and less likely to have received predialysis nephrology care. After adjustment for clinical and demographic factors, peripherally inserted central catheters placed before or after hemodialysis initiation were independently associated with lower likelihoods of transition to any working fistula or graft (hazard ratio for prehemodialysis peripherally inserted central catheter, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 0.91; hazard ratio for posthemodialysis peripherally inserted central catheter, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.73 to 0.89). Peripherally inserted central catheter placement was common and associated with adverse vascular access outcomes. Recognition of potential long-term adverse consequences of peripherally inserted central catheters is essential for clinicians caring for patients with CKD.

Geographic and facility variation in initial use of non-tunneled catheters for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients

BackgroundNon-tunneled (temporary) hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) are the least-optimal initial vascular access for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients yet little is known about factors associated with NTHC use in this context. We sought to determine factors associated with NTHC use and examine regional and facility-level variation in NTHC use for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients.MethodsWe analyzed registry data collected between January 2001 and December 2010 from 61 dialysis facilities within 12 geographic regions in Canada. Multi-level models and intra-class correlation coefficients were used to evaluate variation in NTHC use as initial hemodialysis access across facilities and geographic regions. Facility and patient characteristics associated with the lowest and highest quartiles of NTHC use were compared.ResultsDuring the study period, 21,052 patients initiated maintenance hemodialysis using a central venous catheter (CVC). This included 10,183 patients (48.3 %) in whom the initial CVC was a NTHC, as opposed to a tunneled CVC. Crude variation in NTHC use across facilities ranged from 3.7 to 99.4 % and across geographic regions from 32.4 to 85.1 %. In an adjusted multi-level logistic regression model, the proportion of total variation in NTHC use explained by facility-level and regional variation was 40.0 % and 34.1 %, respectively. Similar results were observed for the subgroup of patients who received greater than 12 months of pre-dialysis nephrology care. Patient-level factors associated with increased NTHC use were male gender, history of angina, pulmonary edema, COPD, hypertension, increasing distance from dialysis facility, higher serum phosphate, lower serum albumin and later calendar year.ConclusionsThere is wide variation in NTHC use as initial vascular access for incident maintenance hemodialysis patients across facilities and geographic regions in Canada. Identifying modifiable factors that explain this variation could facilitate a reduction of NTHC use in favor of more optimal initial vascular access.