Preoperative Autologous Donation Research Articles

Blood management in orthopedic surgery

The orthopedic surgeon has several options available for blood conservation. Preoperative autologous donation (PAD) of blood is a cost-effective measure when the cost of managing transfusion-transmitted infectious disease is considered; overuse and underuse are expensive problems, however. Hemodilution, while used successfully in prostate surgery, is logistically impractical in joint replacement centers. Intraoperative blood salvage, although costly, is useful in orthopedic procedures when the anticipated blood loss is > 1,000 mL. Reinfusion of postoperative drainage that has been filtered and washed is being used in some orthopedic procedures. Studies are under way to determine whether this method of blood conservation alters transfusion requirements. Recombinant human erythropoietin (Epoetin alfa) has a role in elective procedures with significant blood loss, including complex revision joint replacement, bilateral joint arthroplasty, and spinal fusion. Preoperative Epoetin alfa administration enhances preoperative autologous blood collection and increases perioperative red blood cell mass.

Autologous blood donation in cardiac patients

Despite the advantages of autologous blood transfusion, doubt still remains about its safety in cardiac patients. We report our experience with 439 cardiac patients who donated a total of 1692 units of blood before coronary, valvular, or congenital cardiac operations. During the collections, patients were continuously monitored with ECG, blood pressure, and heart rate. In 22 collections we observed vasovagal reactions, which represents an incidence of 1.3% of the total number of collections. The patients recovered quickly and only in 3 cases was volume replacement with saline needed. There were no other complications which could be related to the preoperative autologous donation program. We feel that, with careful selection of the patients and of the circumstances surrounding the collection of blood, autologous blood donation in cardiac patients is a safe and beneficial experience.

Autologous blood donation in cardiac patients

Despite the advantages of autologous blood transfusion, doubt still remains about its safety in cardiac patients. We report our experience with 439 cardiac patients who donated a total of 1692 units of blood before coronary, valvular, or congenital cardiac operations. During the collections, patients were continuously monitored with ECG, blood pressure, and heart rate. In 22 collections we observed vasovagal reactions, which represents an incidence of 1.3% of the total number of collections. The patients recovered quickly and only in 3 cases was volume replacement with saline needed. There were no other complications which could be related to the preoperative autologous donation program. We feel that, with careful selection of the patients and of the circumstances surrounding the collection of blood, autologous blood donation in cardiac patients is a safe and beneficial experience.

Blood transfusion for radical hysterectomy before and after the discovery of transfusion‐related human immunodeficiency virus infection

To compare the patterns of perioperative blood transfusion in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy in time periods before and after the discovery of transfusion-related human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center during two time periods, an early period (January 1, 1980 through December 31, 1993) and a late period (July 1, 1991 through June 30, 1993). The early period preceded and the late period coincided with the era of increased awareness of transfusion-related HIV infections.One hundred twenty-eight patients underwent radical hysterectomy in the early period and 71 in the late period. In the late period, markedly fewer units of blood were transfused per patient (0.62 versus 3.5). Most patients in the early period received at least one unit (117 of 128, 91%), compared with less than half (31 of 71, 44%) in the late period. For patients who received transfusions, notably fewer received homologous blood during the late (6 of 31, 19%) versus the early period (117 of 117, 100%). Using an unpaired t test and the 95% confidence interval (CI), we found that the patients in the late period had a shorter mean postoperative length of stay (11 versus 14 days, P < .0001, 95% CI +/- 1.3) and were discharged with a significantly lower mean hemoglobin level (9.7 versus 11.4 g/dL, P < .0001, 95% CI +/- 0.35). The mean estimated blood loss was lower in the late period (756 versus 1598 mL). We defined the transfusion index as the number of units transfused per 500 mL of estimated blood loss. The mean transfusion index was significantly lower during the late period (0.38 versus 1.1, P < .001, 95% CI +/- 0.19).During the perioperative period for radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, the incidence of blood transfusion at our institution has markedly decreased over the past decade without immediate adverse effects on postoperative recovery. The reasons for this are probably multifactorial. However, the contribution of increased concern about transfusion-related HIV infections must be considered. Preoperative autologous donation can notably decrease the need for homologous transfusion.

Impact of autologous blood predonation on a comprehensive blood conservation program

Preoperative autologous donation has been shown to be a highly effective measure in reducing homologous blood use in cardiac operations. The aim of our study was to verify the effectiveness of this procedure and to see whether it is compatible with a comprehensive blood conservation program. Three hundred forty-eight patients (group 1) donated an average of 657 +/- 199 mL of blood before open heart operation, whereas 344 patients (group 2) without autologous predonation were used as a control. The two groups were compared with regard to homologous blood use and the possibility of applying other blood conservation measures. Homologous transfusion rate in group 1 was 12.6%, whereas in group 2 it was 46% (p < 0.001). Patients with three units of predonated autologous blood had a transfusion rate of 0.8% (p < 0.001 compared with group 2). In group 1, acute normovolemic hemodilution was accomplished in a lower number of patients and with a lower average withdrawal (338 +/- 102 versus 403 +/- 145 mL; p < 0.001). Other blood conservation measures such as the return of mediastinal drainage and use of residual blood of extracorporeal circulation were applied with similar results in both groups. In our experience, preoperative autologous donation was compatible with the application of other blood conservation measures, but acute normovolemic hemodilution was achieved in a lower number of patients. Preoperative autologous donation proved to be a highly effective method for reducing banked blood use and therefore homologous blood exposure during and after cardiac operations.

Determinants of physician ordering of preoperative autologous donations.

Preoperative autologous donation (PAD) is frequently utilized to reduce infectious disease transmission risks, but it is an expensive form of hemotherapy that is not always closely matched with the needs of the patients. We compared the use of PAD in an academic medical center with patient needs and then investigated the efficacy of a simple intervention to promote targeting of PAD toward patients most likely to benefit from having PADs available. Over a 3-month period, surgeons whose patients received allogeneic components were asked to complete a questionnaire designed to identify reasons for not ordering PAD. PAD units were used in 14 (11%) of 124 cases, accounting for 6% of perioperative red cell use. The responses (46, 42% of the surveys sent) stated that PAD had not been ordered because of time constraints (39%), medical problems (26%), anemia (15%), and lack of expectation of blood use (24%). Chart review documented the presence of cited conditions in 88% of cases. Logistic and cost concerns were not evident. However, only 8% of the 176 PAD units collected in that period were transfused. Following dissemination of PAD ordering guidelines, this proportion rose to 52% without a reduction in the proportion of elective surgical cases utilizing autologous transfusion. This improvement in ordering practice was maintained over at least in 5-month period. Thus we were able to improve the efficiency of PAD application (reducing over-ordering) through a simple feedback to surgeons that assisted them in targeting PAD toward patients most likely to need transfusion.

Preoperative autologous donation: Surgery clinic staff knowledge/attitudes

Preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD) is both under- and overused. Although the decision to order PABD lies with the surgeon, it is quite likely that other surgery clinic personnel influence patient acceptance and enrollment into PABD programs. Accordingly, we measured knowledge, attitudes, and the referral practice of clinic personnel pertaining to PABD. We administered a questionnaire to 102 nurses and 33 clerks working in surgery clinics at three university medical centers--one center in an area with a high incidence of AIDS and two centers in areas of low incidence of AIDS. Knowledge of PABD was poor when assessed by six questions. Only 6% each of nurses and clerks answered all questions correctly; 55% of nurses and 54% clerks missed three or more of the six questions. Surprisingly, no differences (P > .05) in knowledge deficits were noted when personnel from high and low AIDS areas were compared--indicating an overall need for education about PABD. In general, attitudes about PABD were positive, as most respondents (63%) gave favorable answers. Clinic personnel from the high AIDS area had even more favorable attitudes (P = .02). Because of these favorable attitudes, it seems likely that educational programs dealing with PABD would be readily accepted by clinic personnel. Greater knowledge should enhance the effectiveness of clinic staff in identifying, counseling, and referring eligible patients for this service.

Determinants of Physician Ordering of Preoperative Autologous Donations

Determinants of Physician Ordering of Preoperative Autologous Donations

Intraoperative blood salvage in children and young adults undergoing spinal surgery with predeposited autologous blood: efficacy and cost effectiveness.

We conducted a retrospective review of 155 spinal operations at our institution to determine the efficacy of intraoperative salvage. Addition of intraoperative salvage had little effect on the success of a preoperative autologous donation program. Only patients with operative blood loss > 2,000 ml (12% of patients) benefited from this expensive source of autologous blood. The technique tended to be most effective in children aged 16-18 years. Use of intraoperative salvage for all pediatric spinal procedures is neither necessary nor cost effective.

The safety of preoperative autologous blood donation in the nonhospital setting

The increasing use of preoperative autologous donation (PAD) of blood has led to more frequent donation in settings outside of hospitals, despite concerns that persons making PADs may face increased risks of postdonation reaction. Analysis was conducted of 5660 PADs made at 25 different blood centers, to determine the risks of PAD in nonhospital settings and to search for predictors of severe reactions. Sixteen percent (886) of the donations studied were by persons who did not meet all usual homologous donor criteria. The most common variances were for cardiovascular disease, including the use of cardiac drugs (416 donors, 41% of those not meeting criteria), history of angina (204, 23%), and history of myocardial infarction (192, 22%). Donation by persons not meeting routine criteria was followed by a higher reaction rate than that by donors without any variance (4.3 vs. 2.7%; p less than 0.0001). An increased likelihood of reaction was associated with donor age less than 17 years, female gender, weight less than 110 pounds, and a history of reaction. Four reactions were graded as severe (transient ischemic attack, 1; angina, 3), and all occurred in donors not meeting all criteria (0.4% of 886 donations). A review of these donors' histories failed to identify distinguishing features from which their severe reactions could have been predicted. This study documents the infrequency of severe reactions after PADs by persons referred to a blood center for donation, even those not meeting routine homologous donor criteria, and quantitates the risk to these donors of a severe reaction.

Preoperative autologous donation: what have we learned?

Preoperative autologous donation: what have we learned?

Accelerated erythropoiesis: the hidden benefit of autologous donation

The risks associated with the administration of blood products have increased efforts to avoid homologous transfusions. Preoperative autologous donation has received renewed interest as a method of decreasing homologous transfusion requirements. Autologous donations may also stimulate postoperative erythropoiesis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of an aggressive autologous donation program on postoperative erythropoiesis. Ten adult male baboons were divided into two groups. The autologous group (n = 5) donated an average of 2 units of blood per week for 5 weeks before operation. The control group (n = 5) had no preoperative treatment. All animals then underwent a laparotomy and exchange transfusion with hetastarch to a final hematocrit of 15 percent. The time required to recover to hematocrits of 20 percent (3.3 vs. 5.7 days, p less than 0.01), 25 percent (7.0 vs. 8.8 days, p less than 0.05), and 30 percent (11.1 vs. 17.7 days, p less than 0.01) was shorter in the autologous group. The autologous group had more intense reticulocytosis during the first 4 postoperative days (p less than 0.03). The data show that participation in an aggressive autologous donation program improves the erythropoietic response to anemia in the postoperative setting. This represents a hidden benefit of preoperative autologous donations and suggests that more aggressive donation schedules may be clinically beneficial. Recognition of that acceleration of erythropoiesis by autologous donation could further reduce the need for transfusion of homologous blood.

Predonated autologous blood use in elective cardiac surgery

The risks of homologous blood transfusion are well documented and recently increased with the emergence of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Preoperative autologous donation has been suggested to reduce these risks. This is a report concerning 104 consecutive adult autologous donors (group 1) who had an elective cardiac operation. A similar group of 111 patients operated on during the same period but without autologous blood donation was used for comparison (group 2). Both groups contained similar numbers of patients with coronary artery disease, valvular disease, and mixed lesions, and both had several patients with atrial septal defects. Group 2 patients (mean age, 67.8 years) were significantly older than group 1 patients (mean age, 58.9 years) ( p < 0.05). The mean donation in group 1 was 4.1 units, but 12 (11.5%) had to discontinue donations. Increasing angina in 10 (12.2%) of the 82 patients with coronary artery disease was the most common complication, and necessitated hospitalization in two instances. In 77 (75.5%) of the 102 group 1 patients who had operation and 23 (21%) of the 110 group 2 patients, no homologous blood products were required. Group 1 patients used significantly less homologous fresh frozen plasma (0.1 unit versus 0.97 unit; p < 0.005) and packed red blood cells (0.6 unit versus 2.1 units; p < 0.001) than group 2 patients. Group 1 patients received 3.3 and 3.1 units of autologous packed cells and plasma, respectively. No complications of autologous transfusion were seen. Predonation of autologous blood is an effective, safe method of reducing homologous blood requirements in elective cardiac operations, but it does carry some risk, especially in patients with coronary artery disease.

Autologous Blood Donation-Reply

<h3>In Reply.</h3> —The letter by Dr Kempen concerning the merits of acute normovolemic hemodilution for optimal blood conservation deserves several comments. He is certainly correct in saying that this technique is underutilized by surgeons and anesthesiologists; an American Association of Anesthesiology workshop has been scheduled to address issues related to this (L. Stehling, MD, personal communication, Feb 8, 1988). Methods of autologous procurement and blood transfusion (preoperative autologous donation, acute normovolemic hemodilution, and blood salvage and reinfusion) are complementary; when these are coupled with physician acceptance of postoperative normovolemic anemia, the subsequent use of homologous blood in certain surgical situations such as coronary artery revascularization has been shown to be dramatically reduced.¹ We have analyzed 175 consecutive adult patients undergoing elective orthopedic procedures enrolled in our autologous blood predeposit program to define possible limitations of autologous preoperative donation.²As seen in the Table, 145 (83%) were able to