Postoperative Analgesia In Patients Research Articles

Evaluating Modified Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Enhanced Postoperative Recovery in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Patients

Evaluating Modified Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Enhanced Postoperative Recovery in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Patients

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

PurposeMinimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for analgesia after MIDCAB.MethodsWe conducted randomized controlled trial in 60 patients undergoing MIDCAB who received either a single-shot ESPB with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% (ESPB group, n = 30) or normal saline 0.9% (control group, n = 30). The primary outcome was numerical rating scale (NRS) pain scores at rest within 48 hr postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included postoperative NRS pain scores on deep inspiration within 48 hr, hydromorphone consumption, and quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 and 48 hr.ResultsCompared with the control group, the ESPB group had lower NRS pain scores at rest at 6 hr (estimated mean difference, –2.1; 99% confidence interval [CI], –2.7 to –1.5; P < 0.001), 12 hr (–1.9; 99% CI, –2.6 to –1.2; P < 0.001), and 18 hr (–1.2; 99% CI, –1.8 to –0.6; P < 0.001) after surgery. The ESPB group also showed lower pain scores on deep inspiration at 6 hr (–2.9; 99% CI, –3.6 to –2.1; P < 0.001), 12 hr (–2.3; 99% CI, –3.1 to –1.5; P < 0.001), and 18 hr (–1.0; 99% CI, –1.8 to –0.2; P = 0.01) postoperatively. Patients in the ESPB group had lower total intraoperative fentanyl use, lower 24-hr hydromorphone consumption, a shorter time to extubation, and a shorter time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge.ConclusionErector spinae plane block provided early effective postoperative analgesia and reduced opioid consumption, time to extubation, and ICU discharge in patients undergoing MIDCAB.Trial registrationwww.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100052810); registered 5 November 2021.

Which ultrasound-guided parasternal intercostal nerve block for post-sternotomy pain? Results from a prospective observational study

BackgroundParasternal intercostal blocks (PSB) have been proposed for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing median sternotomy. PSB can be achieved using two different approaches, the superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIP) and deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIP) respectively.MethodsWe designed the present prospective, observational cohort study to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two approaches. Cardiac surgical patients who underwent full sternotomy from January to September 2022 were enrolled and divided into three groups, according to pain control strategy: morphine, SPIP, and DPIP group. Primary outcomes were was postoperative pain evaluated as absolute value of NRS at 12 h. Secondary outcomes were the NRS at 24 and 48 h, the need for salvage analgesia (both opioids and NSAIDs), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to extubation, mechanical ventilation duration, and bowel disfunction.ResultsNinety-six were enrolled. There was no significant difference in terms of median Numeric Pain Rating Scale at 24 h and at 48 h between the study groups. Total postoperative morphine consumption was 1.00 (0.00–3.00), 2.00 (0.00–5.50), and 15.60 mg (9.60–30.00) in the SPIP, DPIP, and morphine group, respectively (SPIP and DPIP vs morphine: p < 0.001). Metoclopramide consumption was lower in SPIP and DPIP group compared with morphine group (p = 0.01). There was no difference in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and of bowel activity between the study groups. Two pneumothorax occurred in the DPIP group.ConclusionsBoth SPIP and DPIP seem able to guarantee an effective pain management in the postoperative phase of cardiac surgeries via full median sternotomy while ensuring a reduced consumption of opioids and antiemetic drugs.

Comparing Continuous and Intermittent Infusion Effects on Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) of local anesthetic produces wider sensory blockade and better analgesia than continuous infusion (CI). We designed this trial to compare the effects of these two different infusion methods combined with Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks (cSAPBs) on postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. We randomly allocated 66 patients under going elective video-assisted thoracoscopic unilateral lung resection surgery to two groups (PIBI group and CI group, n=33 per group). After the surgical operation, the patients received ultrasound-guided ipsilateral SAPB, we randomized them to receive either automated intermittent boluses or continuous infusion of 0.3% ropivacaine. Tramadol consumption during the 48 hours following surgery was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included cumulative tramadol consumption during the first 24-h and the second 24-h periods after surgery, pain scores, patient satisfaction, blocked dermatomes, and adverse events. During 48h, tramadol consumption in the PIBI group was significantly lower than in the CI group (190 mg [125, 305] vs 220 mg [170, 480], p= 0.034). As compared to the CI group, the PIBI group consumed less tramadol during the first 24 hours (145 mg [87.5, 210] vs 190 mg [140, 400], p=0.012). The dermatomes anesthetized to the pinprick and cold test were significantly more abundant in the PIBI group than in the CI group (3 [3,4] vs. 5 [4,5], p<0.001). Both groups had similar VAS scores at rest and when moving (p>0.05). Additionally, the PIBI group showed greater patient satisfaction. Both groups experienced similar adverse events (p>0.05). Compared with CI, PIBI administration regimen (0.3% ropivacaine 5 mL/h) for cSAPBs resulted in lower tramadol consumption, superior analgesia during the initial 12 h after the operation, and higher patient satisfaction. PIBI combined with cSAPBs was a better choice for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided genicular block vs. intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: A randomised prospective study

Aim: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a major orthopedic surgical procedure often necessitating effective postoperative analgesia. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided genicular block (GB) and intrathecal morphine (ITM) in patients undergoing THA under spinal anesthesia.Method: A prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted at Ordu University Training and Research Hospital from October 1, 2022, to April 1, 2023. Eligible patients aged 18 to 90 undergoing knee surgery with spinal anesthesia were randomized into two groups: Group ITM received intrathecal morphine, while Group GB underwent ultrasound-guided triple genicular block. Pain scores, rescue opioid consumption, time to initial mobilization, and Modified Bromage Scale (MBS) scores were assessed at five time points (0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours) within the first 24 hours post-surgery.Results: At the 24-hour mark, cumulative tramadol consumption was significantly lower in Group ITM compared to Group GB (35.45±54.84 vs. 63.37±37.7 mg, respectively, p = 0.028). Group ITM also exhibited statistically lower Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores at 12 hours (p = 0.005) but had similar scores at other time points. Additionally, time to first ambulation and MBS scores were consistent across all intervals (p &lt; 0.05).Conclusions: In patients undergoing knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia, those receiving ultrasound-guided genicular blocks demonstrated higher opioid consumption over a 24-hour period compared to those receiving intrathecal morphine. However, regarding postoperative pain scores, both groups exhibited similar outcomes. These findings provide valuable insights into the selection of postoperative analgesic modalities for TKA patients.

Effect of oxycodone combined with ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block on postoperative analgesia in patients with lung cancer undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: protocol for a randomised controlled study

IntroductionPostoperative pain is a main component influencing the recovery of patients with lung cancer. The combination of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) and paravertebral nerve block for postoperative analgesia in patients...

A randomised, prospective, double blind study of intraperitoneal instillation of 0.25% bupivacaine with clonidine versus 0.25% bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard and most accepted technique for Cholecystectomies due to lesser postop pain and short recovery time.The origin of abdominal and shoulder pain after laparoscopic procedures has led to the use of intra peritoneal instillation of local anaesthetic agent to reduce postoperative pain. To assess the efficacy and quality of postoperative analgesia between the study groups using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at various time intervals along with side effects if any.: 60 patients belonging to ASA 1 and 11 categories posted for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy were given General Anaesthesia. After completion of surgery, before removing the trocar, anaesthetic study solution was sprayed on the surface of liver, gall bladder bed, right sub-diaphragmatic space, and port sites in Trendelenburg position. Volume and dilution of two drugs were same in both groups. Bupivacaine (0.25%) 50 mL; Dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg) (BD) or Clonidine (1 µg/kg) (BC) was used. VAS score, Heart rate and BP measured at various time intervals and the time of first rescue analgesia noted.: VAS of BD group was 5.27 ± 0.64 to 3.70 ± 0.837 from 1 hour to 6 hour post extubation, when compared to BC group of 6.03 ± 0.669 in 1 hour reduced to 4.17 ± 0.699 at 6 hour post extubation. Dexmedetomidine combination significantly reduced the total dose of rescue analgesic required in 24 hours as compared to Clonidine combination.

Predictive Ability of Perfusion Index for Determining the Success of Adductor Canal Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

The perfusion index (PI) is an objective method used to determine a successful nerve block. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic ability of the PI for a successful adductor canal nerve block (ACB) and suggest the optimal PI cut-off value for predicting a block. This study was a prospective observational study and enrolled a total of 39 patients. The patients were dichotomized into successful and inappropriate ACB groups according to the results of the sensation tests. The PI value, Pleth variability index (PVi) value, and heart rate were recorded one minute before the block, at the time of the block, and one to 30 min after the block at one-minute intervals. Delta (dPI), which was defined as the difference in PI value from the baseline (the value one minute before the block), was the primary outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to determine the dPI prognostic accuracy and optimal cut-off value. Successful ACB was achieved in 33 patients, while ACB was inappropriate in six patients. The dPI showed significant differences between the two groups under the time interval measured (p = 0.001). The dPI at 5 and 20 min showed good prognostic ability for a successful block, with optimal cut-off values of 0.33 (AUROC: 0.725, 95% CI 0.499-0.951) and 0.64 (AUROC: 0.813, 95% CI 0.599-1.000), respectively. The dPI is an effective predictor of successful ACB. The suggested dPI cut-off values at 5 and 20 min were below 0.33 and 0.64, respectively.

Efficacy of pre-emptive peripheral nerve block using 0.25% bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing maxillofacial surgeries under general anesthesia

Background: Conventional analgesia using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs not only provides inadequate pain relief but also can produce a multitude of systemic adverse effects. During oral and maxillofacial surgeries, inhibition of central sensitization by pre-incision nerve blocks with local anesthetic can reduce postoperative pain, may curtail analgesic requirement, and thereby can provide better patient comfort. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pre-incisional peripheral nerve block using 0.25% bupivacaine over placebo for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery under general anesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty patients of 18–35 years of either sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I and II had undergone oral and maxillofacial surgeries were divided into two groups to receive bupivacaine 0.25% (Study group, n=60) normal saline (Control group, n=60) for nerve block before surgical incision. Postoperative pain was assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and verbal response scale (VRS) score. The number of rescue analgesia was required in the first 24 h and the incidence of any complications associated with this agent was documented. Results: The VAS score was found considerably lower in the bupivacaine group compared with the control group in the first 24 h of postoperative period (P&lt;0.05). A similar trend was observed with VRS score in the first 16 h of postoperative period (P&lt;0.05). The number of rescue analgesia required in the control group was much higher in comparison with the study group. There was no serious adverse event in both the groups. Conclusion: Bupivacaine 0.25% as pre-emptive analgesia can be used to reduce postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in maxillofacial surgeries.

Efficacy of Tenoxicam, Paracetamol, and Their Combination in Postoperative Pain After Double-Jaw Surgery.

Introduction Orthognathic surgical procedures include a series of surgical operations in which interventions are applied to the maxilla, mandible, or both for occlusal or aesthetic concerns due to facial skeletal development deformities. Double-jaw surgeries have the highest pain scores, in which both maxilla and mandible bones are intervened. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of individual applications of paracetamol and tenoxicam with their combined application on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing double-jaw surgery. Methods In this randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients undergoing double-jaw surgery were allocated into three groups, with each having 20 patients: the paracetamol group, the tenoxicam group, and the paracetamol-tenoxicam combination group. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) at intervals of 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 120 minutes, and again at the 24th postoperative hour. Additionally, the consumption of opioids and other rescue analgesics was documented over the 24-hour postoperative period. Results The VAS values at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 24 hours were lower in the paracetamol-tenoxicam group compared to the other groups (p<0.001). The need for a rescue analgesic drug in the first 24 hours was not observed in the tenoxicam and paracetamol-tenoxicam groups. Conclusion It was concluded that both tenoxicam and paracetamol-tenoxicam combinations, especially the tenoxicam-paracetamol combination, were good options for postoperative analgesia in patients with double-jaw surgery.

A Comparative Evaluation of Intra-articular Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries.

Background The studywas done to determinethe duration of postoperative analgesia brought on by incorporating intra-articular Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant following knee arthroscopies. Methods A prospective randomized control study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA classes I and II, between the ages of 20 and 60 years, undergoing arthroscopic surgeries of the knee under spinal anaesthesia. The patients were divided into group B and group D, each containing 30 patients. The participants in group B were administered Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 19 mL + 1 mL of normal saline intra-articularly and the participants in group D were administered Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 19 mL, Inj. Dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and normal saline post-surgery. Thenumber of analgesics used in the first 24 hours, pain levels using the visual analogue scale and the timing of administration of the first analgesic dose between the two study groups were evaluated. Results In comparison to the Bupivacaine group, the Dexmedetomidine group required fewer rescue analgesics. The visual analogue visual scale score in group B at four hours and six hours was 2.7 ± 1.39 and2.9 ± 1.03, respectively, and in group D at four hours and six hours was 1.9 ± 1.09 and 1.83 ± 0.91. The visual analoguescale scores at these times were statistically significant. The visual analogue scale scores at 12 hours and 24 hours were statistically not significant. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine added to Intra-articular Bupivacaine provides an increased duration of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgeries of the knee. The combination offers improved analgesia and reduces the overall dosage of rescue analgesics needed without causing substantial side effects.

Comparison of Bilateral Ultrasound-Guided Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block vs Local Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Thyroidectomy

Abstract Background The thyroid gland surgery is a common and painful procedure demanding analgesia. Bilateral intermediate cervical plexus block (BSCPB) could be beneficial for analgesia in thyroid surgery. In this study we will evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided intermediate cervical plexus block vs local wound infiltration in patients undergoing elective thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia. Objective To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and possible side effects of ultrasound guided intermediate cervical plexus block vs local wound infiltration in patients undergoing elective thyroidectomy under general anaesthesia as a primary outcome. The secondary outcome is the assessment of the safety of ICPB and the total dose of meperidine used for 24 hours postoperatively. Patients and Methods 40 patients were divided into two equal groups: Group A: The patients received intermediate cervical plexus block with 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The same will be repeated on the contralateral side. Group B: Patient will receive local wound infiltration with 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% under the skin immediately before extubation by the surgeon for pain control. Results ICPB group showed significant lower median score compared with LWI group at time 2 hrs, 4 hrs, 6 hrs, 12 hrs The time for first dose meperidine was significantly longer in ICPB group (17.2 ± 3.02 vs 10.15 ± 1.84) while Total 24 h meperidine consumption was significantly less in ICPB (26.25 ± 17.16 vs 36.25 ± 12.76) Conclusion Intermediate cervical plexus block provides another safe alternative analgesia compared to superficial blocks and local wound infiltration with better analgesic efficacy.

Comparative Study between Bupivacaine 0.5% in TAP Block versus Diclophenac Sodium IM for Post-Operative Analgesia after Cesarean Section

Background Cesarean section is one of the commonly performed surgical procedures in the field of obstetrics. It accounts for more than one-fourth of all births worldwide. The most common undesirable outcome following cesarean section is postoperative pain. Failure to treat the pain not only causes distress to the mother but also affects mother‑baby bonding, which, in turn, affects care and breastfeeding of the newborn. Objective The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of US guided TAP block using 0.5% bupivacaine versus declophinac sodium for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing cesearean section and reducing nalufine dose. Methods This prospective study was conducted at tertiary care hospital at Ain Shams University hospitals for 6 months from June to December 2020 and performed on total 80 patients who underwent elective cesarean section. Results Our research study revealed that there was statistically significant increase in visual analogue score in diclofenac group than TAP block group explained by removal of effect of spinal anaesthesia and regaining of pain sensation in diclofenac group while persistence of anaesthetic effect of bupivacaine in TAP block group. Our study found that there was statistically significant increase in the time to first request of analgesia in TAP block group than diclofenac group. Also, there was statistically significant decrease in the total consumption of Pethidine (mg) in TAP block group than Diclofenac group. There was no statistically significant difference between Diclofenac group &amp; TAP block group regarding adverse effects post operative nausea &amp; vomiting. Conclusion The analgesic efficacy of the US-guided TAP block after Caesarean delivery compared to the combination of sodium diclofenac with less requirement of rescue analgesic.

Evaluation of the Analgesic Efficacy of Surgically Assisted Linea Semilunaris Block for Post-operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Caesarean Section Under Spinal Anaesthesia.

Post-operative pain following a caesarean section has been described as moderate to severe. If left untreated, the pain has a negative impact on maternal recovery and psychology. Surgically assisted linea semilunaris anterior abdominal block has been proposed to be an efficacious analgesic modality in such cases. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy of post-operative analgesia provided by linea semilunaris block in patients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Eighty parturients planned for elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomised into two groups. In group B, a surgically assisted Linea semilunaris anterior abdominal block was given bilaterally after the closure of the uterine incision using 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline. For group C, conventional analgesia protocols were followed in the post-op period. Inj. paracetamol 1 g i.v. was routinely administered, and inj. tramadol 50 mg i.v. was given as a rescue analgesic in both groups. The primary outcome of the present study was the total amount of rescue analgesia consumed over 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included resting and dynamic pain scores [Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)], time to first rescue analgesia, quality of sleep, and patient satisfaction using the Likert scale. The mean total amount of rescue analgesia consumed over 24 hours was significantly higher in group C (150.00 ± 0.00) than in group B (125.75 ± 25.32); p = 0.001. The mean NRS at 2, 4, 12, and 24 hours was significantly higher in group B than in group C. The time to first rescue analgesia was longer in group B, with better sleep quality, patient satisfaction, and fewer complications. The linea semilunaris block provided effective analgesia and can be considered an alternative analgesic modality to other conventional abdominal wall blocks for post-caesarean pain relief.

Effect of postoperative application of esketamine on postoperative depression and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy: a randomized controlled trial protocol

BackgroundPancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is traumatic, difficult to perform, and has a high incidence of postoperative complications and perioperative mortality. Postoperative complications and pain occur frequently and seriously affect the psychological status of patients. Esketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, has analgesic and antidepressant effects. In this study, we aim to investigate the effect of esketamine on postoperative depression and pain in patients undergoing PD.Methods/designThis prospective, single-center, randomized control trial will include 80 patients who will undergo elective PD. The patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group that will receive esketamine (n = 40) and the control group (n = 40). In the esketamine group, the analgesic pump will be connected immediately after surgery. A solution of esketamine 1.5 mg/kg + sufentanil 2 µg/kg, diluted to 150 mL, will be administered continuously for 72 h at the background infusion and impact doses of 1 mL/h and 2 mL/time, respectively; the locking time will be 10 min. The control group will receive sufentanil 2 µg/kg that will be administered as per the esketamine group. The primary outcome will be the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) score on the third day post-surgery (POD3). Secondary study indicators will include (1) visual analog scale (VAS) score and HAMD-17 score prior to surgery, immediately after entering the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days after surgery; (2) Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days after surgery; (3) consumed doses of sufentanil and esketamine after surgery; (4) postoperative analgesia pump effective press times, rescue analgesia times, and rescue drug dosage, recording the number of rescue analgesia and rescue drug dosage at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after the patient enters the PACU; (5) postoperative complications and adverse events; (6) postoperative hospital stay; (7) concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNP), 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin-6, at 1, 3, and, 5 days post-surgery; and (8) the patient survival rate at 6 and 12 months post-surgery.DiscussionThe study hypothesis is that the postoperative HAMD-17 and VAS scores, incidence of postoperative adverse reactions, and concentration of serum markers BDNP, 5-HT, TNF-α, and IL-6 in the experimental group will be lower than those in the control group.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ChiCTR2200066303. Registered on November 30, 2022.Protocol version: 1.0

IPACK block with spinal anesthesia compared to fentanyl-based spinal anesthesia for postoperative analgesia following arthroscopic meniscectomy: a randomized, prospective study

BackgroundLocal anesthesia and intrathecal narcotics are utilized to provide postoperative analgesia. IPACK (infiltration between the knee capsule and popliteal artery) is a new localized analgesic approach for knee surgery. This randomized study aimed to compare fentanyl-based spinal anesthesia and IPACK block-based spinal anesthesia for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy.ResultsIn group F, the VAS (visual analog scale) was higher than in group I, whereas the total amount of morphine was lower in group I (P < .05). In group F (3.92 ± 1.54), the initial painkiller request occurred earlier than in group I (8.82 ± 0.44). In addition, total morphine administrated in group F (20.81 ± 0.69) was significantly higher than in group I (9.54 ± 0.73) (P < .05). Group I had a higher level of patient satisfaction 24 h after surgery than group F (P < .05). In the current study, there were no significant adverse effects linked to the use of fentanyl. Moreover, no complications associated with the IPACK block were detected.ConclusionsThe combination of IPACK block and hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia is an effective treatment for initial postoperative pain following arthroscopic meniscectomy, according to the findings of this study. IPACK block prolongs postoperative analgesia more than intrathecal fentanyl.Trial registrationThis study was registered with Clinical Trials Registry (NCT05833776).

Comparison of efficacy of intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine and ropivacaine in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries for post-operative analgesia

Background: Sub-arachnoid block or spinal anaesthesia is a common mode of anaesthesia that is used for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Bupivacaine hydrochloride is a long-acting amide anaesthetic used extensively intrathecally. It has the ability to effectively block sensory and motor pathways. However, it has drawbacks, like cardiotoxicity and neurotoxicity. Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide local anaesthetic agent. It has the capacity to block sensory nerves more than motor nerves. Ropivacaine has reduced potential for neurotoxicity and cardiotoxicity. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid. It can be added as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic agents used intrathecally. Fentanyl is characterised by its high potency, rapid serum elimination, and minimal histamine release. The blood-brain barrier can be quickly crossed by fentanyl, which takes one to two minutes to generate analgesia. Objectives: To compare post-operative analgesia in patients receiving bupivacaine with fentanyl and ropivacaine with fentanyl in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries via sub-arachnoid block; onset, duration of analgesia, duration of sensory and motor blockade; study the haemodynamic stability of patients in both groups; compare the requirement of 24 hours rescue analgesia; to compare the incidence of side effects. Methodology: This study will be a comparative interventional study which will be conducted on 60 adult patients of both sexes posted for lower limb orthopaedic surgery. They will be randomly divided into two groups with 30 patients in both groups. Group A: Patients receiving bupivacaine 3 mL with fentanyl 25 µg and Group B: Patients receiving ropivacaine 3mL with fentanyl 25 µg. The onset of and duration of block (sensory as well as motor), hemodynamic parameters, post-operative analgesia time and side effects (if any) will be recorded. Trial registration: Submitted to Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) Trial REF/2023/05/067586

A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Perioperative Multi Modal Analgesia with Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Subcostal TAP Block for Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients undergoing Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy under General Anaesthes

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually performed as a day care procedure for diseases involving the gall bladder. Pain in the immediate post-operative period is due to multiple factors and hence different modalities of pain relief are used. The present study was conducted to study the effectiveness of Peri-operative Multi-Modal Analgesia with ultrasound guided bilateral subcostal TAP block for Post-operative analgesia in 60 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.&#x0D; Methods: In this hospital based, randomized prospective interventional study patients were randomly allocated into 4 groups of 15 in each group, Group B received Bilateral Ultrasound guided Subcostal TAP Block with 20 ml of 0.25% Bupivacaine, Group P received Tab Pregabalin tablet 150 mg, Group D received Inj Dexamethasone 8 mg IV and Group C was the control group. The hemodynamic changes like heart rate, blood pressure, saturation was monitored both intra and post operatively. The post-operative VAS scoring, duration of analgesia, time for first rescue analgesic and the total dose of analgesics in 24 hours were noted.&#x0D; Results: The VAS Scores indicated that Group B&gt; P&gt; D&gt; C provided better analgesia to the patients with a P Value of &lt; 0.01. Group B took the longest mean duration (6.8± 1.15 hours) to take the 1st rescue analgesic and least mean total dose of rescue analgesic in 24 hours followed by Group P, Group D and Group C which was statistically significant.&#x0D; Conclusion: USG guided B/L TAP Block was superior to other modalities in providing postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Ultrasound Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block for Post-Operative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study

Background: Primary objective:&#x0D; &#x0D; Duration of block&#x0D; Post-operative pain score&#x0D; Post-operative rescue analgesic consumption&#x0D; &#x0D; Secondary objective:&#x0D; &#x0D; To observe patient satisfaction score&#x0D; Occurrence of post-operative complications if any.&#x0D; &#x0D; Methods: A total of 60 patients, aged between 18-60yrs, belonging to ASA I &amp; II with hip osteoarthritis requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA) were divided into two groups of 30 each. Patients were randomized into two groups and were given ipsilateral USG guided anterior QLB in the fascial plane between QL and psoas major muscles after surgery. Group C received 30ml NS and group T received 30ml of inj. Ropivacaine 0.2%. Post operatively patient received inj. PCM 1G TDS. Duration of block, requirement of rescue analgesia, VAS score and side effects were the parameters those were monitored and compared.&#x0D; Results: Mode pain score by VAS was significantly lower in T group(p&lt;0.05) than C group which required more analgesia. (The chi-square value-5.9341, p=0.0148). Duration of block was more in T group. Patient satisfaction was noted to be better in T group.&#x0D; Conclusion: Use of post-operative USG guided Ant. QLB reduced VAS score in patient undergoing THA. It also significantly decreased the requirement of post- operative rescue analgesia and improved patient satisfaction.

A study to evaluate the efficacy of instillation of ropivacaine with fentanyl, dexmedetomidine, or morphine through surgical drain for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

Background: Local anesthetics have become vital part of multimodal analgesia approach. Instillation of local anesthetics through surgical drain is easier and safer method than conventional nerve blocks. Various local anesthetic drugs and adjuvants have been used for post-operative pain management through surgical drains. Aims and Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of instillation of ropivacaine with fentanyl, dexmedetomidine or morphine through surgical drain for post-operative analgesia and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. Materials and Methods: A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study was conducted dividing 75 female patients aged 30–70 years who underwent modified radical mastectomy into three groups: Group (RM) received 40 ml 0.25% ropivacaine with 4.5 mg morphine, group (RD) 40 ml 0.25% ropivacaine with 1 mg/kg dexmedetomidine and group (RF) 40 ml 0.25% ropivacaine with 50 microgram fentanyl, instilled through surgical drains. Results: Visual analog score for pain at rest and movement was significantly lower in group RM as compared to group RD and RF with no significant difference among group RD and RF at different time intervals postoperatively. Patient satisfaction at 24-h postoperatively was significantly better in group RM as compared to group RD and RF (P=0.01) with no significant difference among group RD and group RF. Conclusion: Instillation of ropivacaine with morphine provides good pain relief, prolonged duration of analgesia, and good patient satisfaction in the post-operative period as compared to ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl.