PurposeRecipient functional status prior to transplantation, can significantly impact post-transplant survival.MethodsThe 2020 release UNOS data was analyzed. From November 15, 1987 to March 16, 2020 there were 38,643 adult donor hearts meeting inclusion criteria (ejection fraction >10% & <85 & not missing recovery date or recipient functional status). Survival outcomes were compared for recipient's pretransplant level of functional status versus those with near death status. Categories of function were total, some, no assistance needed, and near death. These were compared using adjusted logistic regression (odds of death at 30 days and 1 year) and Cox models (overall survival and time until post-transplant rejection). All models were adjusted for donor age, sex, ethnicity, ischemic time, as well as recipient age, sex, ethnicity, length of stay, region, ventricular assist devices, creatinine, and days on the waiting list.ResultsThere were 11,619 recipients defined as being near death or severely disabled. 7,715 were defined as requiring total assistance in daily living, with 11,780 needing some assistance, and 7,529 needing no assistance. In adjusted models, the probabilities of death for the lowest functioning groups within 30 days and 1 year were 4.7% and 9.7%, respectively. Those requiring total assistance had analogous probabilities of 3.1% (OR=0.61; p<0.001) and 8.9% (OR=0.89; p=0.028). Those requiring some assistance had probabilities of 3.0% (OR=0.58; p<0.001) and 8.5% (OR=0.85; p=0.002). And finally, those requiring no assistance had probabilities of 2.1% (OR=0.39; p<0.001) and 7.2% (OR=0.70; p<0.001). Overall survival outcomes are displayed in the Kaplan-Meier graph of Figure 1.ConclusionRecipient functional status as listed in the UNOS recipient pretransplant evaluation is a strong predictor of survival outcomes. Recipient functional status prior to transplantation, can significantly impact post-transplant survival. The 2020 release UNOS data was analyzed. From November 15, 1987 to March 16, 2020 there were 38,643 adult donor hearts meeting inclusion criteria (ejection fraction >10% & <85 & not missing recovery date or recipient functional status). Survival outcomes were compared for recipient's pretransplant level of functional status versus those with near death status. Categories of function were total, some, no assistance needed, and near death. These were compared using adjusted logistic regression (odds of death at 30 days and 1 year) and Cox models (overall survival and time until post-transplant rejection). All models were adjusted for donor age, sex, ethnicity, ischemic time, as well as recipient age, sex, ethnicity, length of stay, region, ventricular assist devices, creatinine, and days on the waiting list. There were 11,619 recipients defined as being near death or severely disabled. 7,715 were defined as requiring total assistance in daily living, with 11,780 needing some assistance, and 7,529 needing no assistance. In adjusted models, the probabilities of death for the lowest functioning groups within 30 days and 1 year were 4.7% and 9.7%, respectively. Those requiring total assistance had analogous probabilities of 3.1% (OR=0.61; p<0.001) and 8.9% (OR=0.89; p=0.028). Those requiring some assistance had probabilities of 3.0% (OR=0.58; p<0.001) and 8.5% (OR=0.85; p=0.002). And finally, those requiring no assistance had probabilities of 2.1% (OR=0.39; p<0.001) and 7.2% (OR=0.70; p<0.001). Overall survival outcomes are displayed in the Kaplan-Meier graph of Figure 1. Recipient functional status as listed in the UNOS recipient pretransplant evaluation is a strong predictor of survival outcomes.
Read full abstract