Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Research Articles

A Comparison of 2-Year Outcomes in ZUMA-1 (Axicabtagene Ciloleucel [Axi-Cel]) and SCHOLAR-1 in Patients (Pts) with Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma (LBCL)

Background In the SCHOLAR-1 retrospective analysis of pts with refractory LBCL, the objective response rate (ORR) was 26% and the complete response (CR) rate was 7% with available salvage therapies in the pre-chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy era (Crump M, et al. Blood. 2017). These results served as a benchmark for novel therapies. ZUMA-1 (NCT02348216) is the pivotal Phase 1/2 study evaluating axi-cel, an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy, in refractory LBCL. At a median follow-up of 27.1 mo, the ORR in ZUMA-1 was 83% and the CR rate was 58% (Locke FL, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019). Here, we describe comparative analyses of outcomes in ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 after adjusting for refractory status. Methods Pts in both studies had refractory LBCL defined as stable disease of ≤ 6 mo with ≥ 4 cycles of frontline or ≥ 2 cycles of later-line therapy, progressive disease as best response, or relapse ≤ 12 mo post-autologous stem cell transplant (SCT). To address potential imbalances between studies, standardized analyses were performed that equally weighted the proportions of pts by refractory categorization (primary refractory, refractory to ≥ 2nd-line therapy, or relapse after SCT) and presence of post-refractory SCT in each study. Stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) tests and Cox models were used to compare the odds ratio (OR) for response and hazard ratio (HR) for survival between ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1. P values were not adjusted for multiplicity. Results In Phase 2 of ZUMA-1, 101 pts received axi-cel. In SCHOLAR-1, 508 and 497 pts were evaluable for response and survival, respectively. The median follow-up in ZUMA-1 was 2.3 y, and the median follow-up from the overall SCHOLAR-1 study ranged from 7.6-14.8 y across different cohorts. Compared with SCHOLAR-1, ZUMA-1 had higher proportions of pts who received ≥ 3 lines of therapy (69% vs 23%) and pts refractory to 2nd- or later-line therapy (76% vs 62%). Fewer pts in ZUMA-1 were classified as primary refractory vs those in SCHOLAR-1 (26% vs 45%), and relapse rates within 1 y of SCT were similar between studies (21% vs 18%). The standardized ORR and CR rate in ZUMA-1 vs SCHOLAR-1 were 72% and 54% vs 22% and 7%, respectively. The OR for ORR and CR rate were 7.2-fold and 11.5-fold higher, respectively in ZUMA-1 vs SCHOLAR-1 (CMH test; P Conclusions This standardized analysis of ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 indicates that treatment with axi-cel in this selected population increased odds of CR and reduced the risk of death versus standard salvage regimens in an unselected population. Although limited by retrospective evaluation and cross-study comparisons, these results support axi-cel as a highly effective treatment option for pts with refractory LBCL.

Frequency of Marrow Infiltrating PD-1 Expressing CD4 Effectors Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) for Multiple Myeloma Is Prognostic for Clinical Outcome

Introduction: High dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remain standard first line therapy for young fit patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Beyond cytoreduction, ASCT may also alter the bone marrow (BM) immune environment to augment anti-tumour immune responses. A more precise understanding of the immune microenvironment post ASCT and its relationship with clinical outcomes may identify biomarkers to refine prognostication and provide opportunity for therapeutic intervention. Aim: We aimed to define T cell subsets and expression of co-activating and co-inhibitory proteins in the BM early post ASCT, and explore associations with clinical outcomes. Methods: BM samples were obtained at 100 days (D100) post ASCT from 61 MM patients, and 15 healthy donors (HD). BM mononuclear cells (MNCs) were stained for surface (CD3, CD4, CD8, PD-1, LAG-3, and ICOS) and intracellular markers (GzmB, Ki-67, CTLA-4, and FoxP3). Data were acquired on a BD LSR Fortessa and analysed using FlowJo. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined from ASCT as per IMWG criteria, and patient groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. Adverse risk genetics was defined as t(4;14), t(14;16) or del(17p). Results: Median age of patients at ASCT was 58yrs (36-71), 70.5% were male. Median follow up was 17 months (3-54). At diagnosis, 36.1% were ISS stage I, 8.2% had extramedullary disease, and 14.7% had adverse risk genetics. As induction therapy, 96.7% received a proteasome inhibitor, 45.9% an immunomodulatory drug, 54.1% both, and 21.3% received post ASCT maintenance/consolidation. Median PFS was 24 months. At D100, 24.6% had achieved CR, 47.5% VGPR, 21.3% PR, 4.9% SD and none had PD. Improved PFS was found in patients with deeper response (CR/VGPR vs. rest, p=0.003), and with ISS stage I vs II/III (p=0.013). There was a trend for improved PFS with standard risk genetics (p=0.088 cf high risk). MM BM contained lower frequencies of CD3 and CD4 T cells compared to HD (CD3, 28% of live MNCs, vs 41.2%, p=0.012; CD4, 4.1% vs 14.0%, p<0.0001), while CD8 frequency was similar. The frequency of regulatory T cells (CD4+FoxP3+, Tregs) was higher in MM patients compared to HD (0.23% of live MNCs vs 0.07%, p=0.02; 4.2% of CD4+ vs 1.2%, p<0.0001). Thus CD4 effector (CD4+FoxP3-, CD4eff):Treg ratio was lower in MM patients (16.8 vs 140.2, p<0.00001). There was no difference in CD8:Treg ratio. Immune checkpoint proteins were highly expressed on BM T cell subsets in post ASCT compared to HD. CD4eff in MM patients expressed higher frequency of PD-1, LAG-3, ICOS, CTLA-4, GzmB, and Ki-67 (p<0.0001, p=0.0016, p=0.0018, p=0.003, p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). CD8 T cells in MM patients expressed higher frequency of LAG-3, GzmB and Ki-67 (p=0.0003, p<0.0001, and p<0.0001 respectively). We observed higher frequencies of ICOS and CTLA-4 on Tregs in MM patients (vs HD p=0.0025 for both) indicating Treg activation and enhanced suppressive function. There were considerable correlations between the frequency of LAG-3 on different T cell subsets; (CD4eff LAG-3+ vs CD8 LAG-3+ r=0.82, p<0.0001; CD4eff LAG-3+ vs Tregs LAG-3+, r=0.56, p<0.0001; Tregs LAG-3 vs CD8 LAG-3, r=0.5, P<0.0001). Clinical outcomes were not influenced by T cell subsets (CD3, CD4eff, CD8, and Treg) but there was an inverse association with co-inhibitory receptor expression. High frequency (>median) of LAG-3 on CD4eff and CD8, and Tregs was associated with shorter PFS (median 18mo vs 53, p=0.0028; 20mo vs 53, p=0.0057; 20mo vs 53, p=0.046 respectively). Further, patients with high frequency of PD-1 on CD4eff and Ki-67 on CD8 T cells had shorter PFS (median 18mo vs 36, p=0.042 and 18mo vs unreached, p=0.019 respectively). A multivariate Cox regression model was built to include ISS stage, depth of response at D100, and the immune phenotypes identified to correlate with PFS. In this model, high frequency of PD-1 on CD4eff retained independent prognostic value, along with ISS stage and CD8 Ki67+ T cells. Conclusion: We present data indicating that high frequency of PD-1+ CD4eff and Ki67+ CD8 T cells post ASCT associate with shorter PFS in MM patients. Pending confirmation in larger cohorts, these data reveal potential immune biomarkers for poor outcomes, and prompt deeper phenotypic analysis and mechanistic studies to uncover the immune drivers of sustained remissions post ASCT. Disclosures Lee: Autolus Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Research Funding. Yong:Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau.

Ibrutinib for Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma after Standard First Line Therapy and ASCT Is Efficacious but Does Not Overcome the Impact of POD24 - a Retrospective Study from the LWP-EBMT

Ibrutinib for Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma after Standard First Line Therapy and ASCT Is Efficacious but Does Not Overcome the Impact of POD24 - a Retrospective Study from the LWP-EBMT

AL Amyloidosis: The Effects of Maintenance Therapy on Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Outcomes

Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an effective treatment option for many patients with systemic AL amyloidosis (AL). However, the decision to utilize maintenance therapy following ASCT remains controversial and largely unexplored. Studies have shown the benefit of post-ASCT maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) with lenalidomide, but to date, no study has evaluated maintenance in AL patients following ASCT. Furthermore, the growing relevance of cytogenetics in AL may help dictate the incorporation of maintenance therapy as well. It is also relevant to note the emergence of novel targeted therapy options for AL patients, including the plasma cell monoclonal antibody daratumumab, that could be a valuable addition to combination therapies. As such, the present study aims to a) determine the prognostic significance of utilizing maintenance therapy following ASCT b) assess the potential role of cytogenetics on the efficacy of maintenance treatment, and c) investigate the outcomes of daratumumab-treated patients who have undergone ASCT. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 50 consecutive AL patients treated at The Ohio State University who underwent ASCT. Patients received high dose Melphalan (140 or 200 mg/m2) prior to ASCT. Patients were divided into subgroups based on FISH data obtained within 90 days of diagnosis, as well as whether or not they had received maintenance therapy following transplant, which was defined as therapy greater than six months following ASCT. Patients' characteristics were summarized using medians and ranges, or frequencies and percentages, and compared using Mann-Whitney rank sum test or fisher exact test. Primary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), per updated NCCN guidelines, including both organ and hematologic criteria. PFS was defined as the time from date of transplant to day of progression or death from any cause. OS was defined as the time from date of transplant to death from any cause, with censoring those who were still alive at the last follow up. Kaplan-Meier survival function was used to estimate the PFS and OS. The log-rank test was used to test the equality of survivor functions between different groups of patients. Results: Twenty-eight patients (56%) received maintenance and 22 (44%) did not. Majority of patients received lenalidomide maintenance. The median age at transplant was 58 (range 33-71) years, with 66% male. There was no difference in age, dose of melphalan used, disease stage and number of organs involved between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in OS (p=0.32) and PFS (p=0.66) between patients who received maintenance versus those patients who did not receive maintenance (Figure 1A). Among patients with abnormal FISH, there was no difference in survival between these two groups as well (OS: p=0.65; PFS: p=0.15) (Figure 1B). Finally, we tested the efficacy of daratumumab in combination therapy with ASCT in a small patient subset. There was no difference in OS or PFS among patients who underwent ASCT for consolidation, whether or not they received daratumumab. Conclusion: In this small retrospective analysis, maintenance therapy post ASCT had no impact on the PFS or OS of patients with AL. Furthermore, survival was not affected by maintenance in patients with cytogenetic abnormalities or addition of novel monoclonal antibodies. A larger prospective study is needed to assess the benefit of maintenance post ASCT and daratumumab in AL amyloid patients. Disclosures Rosko: Vyxeos: Other: Travel support. Efebera:Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Akcea: Other: Advisory board, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria.

Elotuzumab As Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Consolidation in Patients with High-Risk Myeloma

Introduction: Patients (pts) with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) experience early disease progression post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The median progression free survival (PFS) for HRMM pts undergoing ASCT with lenalidomide (len) maintenance ranges between 27 and 42 months in high risk pts and 22 months in ultra-high risk, defined by two or more adverse cytogenetic abnormalities such as: gain(1q), t(4;14), t(14;16),t(14;20), or del(17p)( Chakraborty et al, Leukemia,2018 and Jackson et al, Lancet, 2018). Elotuzumab, a humanized IgG kappa monoclonal antibody against SLAM-F7 (CS-1), is approved in combination with len and dexamethasone (ERd) in pts with relapsed MM (Dimopoulus et al, BJH, 2017). It directly activates natural killer (NK) cells and mediates myeloma cell death by antibody-dependent cell mediated cytoxicity. We hypothesized that administration of ERd as post-ASCT consolidation will enhance an immune-competent phenotype, by restoring NK cells and effector T-cell populations at a time of maximal disease de-bulking, and will ultimately improve outcomes among pts with HRMM. Methods: Thirty-one HRMM patients who achieved stable disease or better were treated beginning at 30-90 days post ASCT with ERd (29/31 pts) or elotuzumab/pomalidomide )/dex (EPd) (2/31 pts) between September 2016 and February 2019. With institutional review board approval, electronic medical records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, treatment history, adverse events (AE) while on therapy as defined by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), and survival outcomes. Treatment with ERd or EPd was administered for 4 consecutive 28-day cycles per standard dosing regimens with a tapering or discontinuation of corticosteroids per investigator discretion with cycles 3 and 4. HRMM was defined by any of the following: ISS or Revised-ISS stage 3, CD-138 selected FISH with del 17p, 1q21 gain, t(4;14), t(14;16), and t(14;20), cytogenetics with 13q del or complex karyotype, and/or high-risk gene expression profile score. Ultra-HR pts were defined by having both del 13q and 1q21 gain by FISH based on recent unpublished COMPASS data. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was evaluated upon achievement of very good partial remission or complete remission using 10-color multiparametric flow cytometry. PFS was measured using the log-rank test. Response criteria was defined per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Results: Baseline characteristics of all 31 patients are shown in Table 1. Thirty-four percent were ISS-3, 71% (22/31 pts) had high-risk FISH, of which 19% were ultra-high risk (6/22 pts). Seven pts (22.6%) underwent tandem-ASCT pre-consolidation. Of the 8 pts who had GEP testing, 2 (25%) were high risk. Best response to treatment by cycle is depicted in Table 2. Consolidative ERd/EPd deepened response compared to post-ASCT with 71.4% vs 19.4% achieving stringent complete remission (sCR). Post-consolidation, 19.3% vs 12.9%, pre-consolidation, achieved MRD negativity. With a median follow-up of 24.8 months, median PFS was 31.4 months (Figure 1). There was no significant association between median PFS and variables such as tandem ASCT and ultra-HR using multivariate cox regression. Although all pts experienced at least one AE while on therapy, only 1 patient (3.22%) experienced a grade 3 AE. Hematologic AEs included: anemia (48%), neutropenia (45%), and thrombocytopenia (52%), while the most common non-hematologic AEs included: fatigue (32%), malaise (23%), and back pain (19%). One patient experienced a serious AE (SAE) which was PCP pneumonia requiring hospitalization, resulting in early discontinuation from therapy. There was no treatment-related mortality. Conclusion: ERd or EPd as 4 months of fixed duration consolidation therapy post-ASCT resulted in a median PFS of 31.4 months amongst pts with HRMM, similar to or perhaps surpassing historical reports of HRMM pts receiving lenalidomide maintenance until progression. This therapy may offer comparable, if not superior, outcomes while having the advantage of allowing for significant time without therapy and perhaps improving quality of life and financial toxicity. This study is limited due to its retrospective nature. Larger prospective studies evaluating fixed duration ERd/EPd in HRMM patients post ASCT should be conducted. Disclosures Rowley: Allergan: Equity Ownership; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy. Goldberg:COTA: Equity Ownership; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Cancer Outcomes Tracking and Analysis (COTA) Inc.: Equity Ownership. Siegel:Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Biran:Bristol Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding.

Consolidation with Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (KRd) Following ASCT Results in High Rates of Minimal Residual Disease Negativity and Improves Bone Metabolism, in the Absence of Bisphosphonates, Among Newly Diagnosed Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Consolidation therapy post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) seems to deepen disease responses. MRD negativity represents a strong prognostic factor for prolonged remission. Carfilzomib is a second-generation proteasome inhibitor, which in combination with lenalidomide has been associated with high rates of deep responses before ASCT in phase 2 studies. In this context, we prospectively evaluated the role of carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd) as consolidation therapy post-ASCT in newly diagnosed MM pts who have not achieved MRD negative complete remission (CR). The primary endpoint was to assess KRd efficacy in terms of improving disease response, whereas secondary endpoints included percentage of minimal residual disease (MRD) (performed by Next Generation Flow Cytometry) negativity post KRd, safety, time to progression (TTP), time to next treatment (TtNT), overall survival (OS) and the effects of KRd on bone metabolism in the absence of bisphosphonate administration. All pts achieving at least partial response and less than MRD negativity post-ASCT were eligible for inclusion in the study. Consolidation consisted of 4 cycles of KRd, starting on day 100 post-ASCT: carfilzomib was given at a dose of 20 mg/m2 iv on day 1 cycle 1 and 56 mg/m2, on days 1, 8, 15 thereafter; lenalidomide was given at 25 mg daily on days 1-21 and dexamethasone at 40mg weekly every 28-days. All pts continued lenalidomide maintenance 10 mg following consolidation until progressive disease. Pts did not receive bisphosphonates during or post-ASCT as well as throughout the period of KRd consolidation. Bone remodeling was evaluated by the following serum indices before and after KRd (2 measurements for each pt): i) osteoclast regulators (soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin), ii) osteoblast inhibitors (dickkopf-1 and sclerostin) iii) bone resorption markers (CTX and TRACP-5b) and iv) bone formation markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin). Between January 2018 and May 2019, 39 consecutive pts all MRD positive (20M/19F, median age 56 years, range 44-67 years) entered the study. The distribution per revised ISS was 36.1% stage 1, 52.8% stage 2 and 11.1% respectively. After a median follow-up of 16 months (range 1-17) following KRd initiation, 35 (89.7%) pts had received 4 cycles of KRD, whereas two pts continue on treatment and two discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Following ASCT, one (2.6%) pt had achieved stringent CR (sCR), 4 (10.3%) were in CR, 29 (74.4%) were in very good partial remission (VGPR) and 5 pts (12.8%) were in PR. Post KRd consolidation, 30 out of 37 evaluable pts (81%) pts improved their response status with KRd. Overall, 28 (75.7%) pts achieved a sCR, one (2.7%) CR and 8 (21.6%) VGPR, while 25 (67.6%) pts achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Among the 25 MRD negative pts, 11 (44%) were R-ISS stage 1, 13 (52%) stage 2 and one (4%) stage 3. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) scans that were performed in 14 MRD (-) pts were negative for all pts except one. The markers of bone metabolism were measured in 22 pts. Only TRACP-5b levels showed a significant reduction (p=0.011) post KRd consolidation, which suggests a beneficial effect on bone resorption that must be further investigated. No new skeletal-related events (SREs) were reported. No patient has progressed whereas 37/39 (95%) are alive. One patient died due to staphylococcal pneumonia and another due to refractory thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura complicated by brain hemorrhage and in-hospital infection during KRD. 7 (18%) pts experienced ≥grade 3 toxicities (mainly infections, TTP, fatigue, neutropenia, pneumonitis, hypocalcemia and increase of γGT and ALP). There were no new cases of peripheral neuropathy. In conclusion, KRd consolidation with weekly carfilzomib, post ASCT, is highly effective and improves the quality of response by increasing MRD negativity rates. Although it is given for four cycles only, KRD consolidation reduces bone resorption and correlates with no SREs in the absence of bisphosphonates. Infections prophylaxis is strongly encouraged. This triplet combination should be further investigated as a potential consolidation regimen both for standard and high-risk pts. Disclosures Gavriatopoulou: Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Genesis: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Terpos:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medison: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Kastritis:Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Genesis: Honoraria. Dimopoulos:Sanofi Oncology: Research Funding.

Prognostic Implications of Serum Monoclonal Protein Positivity By Mass-Fix in Bone Marrow Minimal Residual Disease Negative (MRD-) Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Prognostic Implications of Serum Monoclonal Protein Positivity By Mass-Fix in Bone Marrow Minimal Residual Disease Negative (MRD-) Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Preliminary Clinical Results from a Phase 1 Study of ACTR707 in Combination with Rituximab in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory CD20+ non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Background: The Antibody-Coupled T-cell Receptor (ACTR) platform is an autologous engineered T-cell therapy that combines the cell-killing ability of T cells and the tumor-targeting ability of co-administered antibodies to exert potent antitumor immune responses. ACTR707 comprises the extracellular domain of CD16 linked to a CD3ζ signaling domain and a CD28 co-stimulatory domain. ACTR707 is in clinical development in combination with rituximab (NCT03189836) or trastuzumab (NCT03680560). Here we present clinical findings from the dose escalation phase of Study ATTCK-20-03, an ongoing, multicenter, phase 1 study of ACTR707+rituximab in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CD20+ NHL. Methods: The primary objectives of this first-in-human study are to evaluate the safety of the combination of ACTR707 and rituximab and to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Other objectives include evaluating antitumor activity and ACTR T-cell persistence. Subjects must have CD20+ NHL that is R/R after prior treatments, which must include anti-CD20 antibody-containing chemotherapy. Subjects receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide and fludarabine) for 3 days, followed by rituximab and a single dose of ACTR707. Additional doses of rituximab are administered q3w until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or Investigator decision. The study includes a dose escalation phase (increasing doses of ACTR707 with fixed dose of rituximab at 375 mg/m2 q3w) and an expansion phase at the RP2D. Results: Six subjects received ACTR707 at Dose Level 1 (DL1; 23-38×106 ACTR+ T cells), 3 subjects at DL2 (30-50×106 ACTR+ T cells), and 5 subjects at DL3 (45-55×106 ACTR+ T cells). The majority of the subjects were diagnosed with DLBCL (93%) and had refractory disease (71%), defined as progressive disease as the best response to any prior treatment or relapse <1 year post autologous stem cell transplant. In DL1 through DL3, as of 27 May 2019, there were no dose-limiting toxicities, AEs of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), serious or severe neurologic AEs, or AEs leading to deaths on treatment. TEAEs reported in >2 subjects, regardless of causality or grade, included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, febrile neutropenia, pyrexia, cough, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. SAEs considered possibly related to ACTR707 were febrile neutropenia (n=2) and cytopenia (n=1). ACTR707 expansion generally reached peak levels within 1 to 2 weeks after administration. All subjects with complete response (CR) up to 1 year had detectable ACTR at the last timepoint evaluated. Higher ACTR707 CD8:CD4 T-cell ratios were associated with clinical responses. Clinical activity was reported across DL1 through DL3, with an overall response rate of 64% including durable complete responses (CRs), with one subject in CR for 387+ days (Table 1). Conclusions: Data available from DL1 through DL3 of ACTR707+rituximab suggest that clinical responses can be achieved without severe T cell-mediated toxicities (eg, CRS and neurotoxicity) that have been reported with other autologous T-cell products. Dose escalation continues at a target dose of 80×106 ACTR+ T cells; enrollment in DL4 (n=6) was recently completed. Updated data, including identified correlates of clinical outcomes, will be presented for DL1 through DL4. Disclosures Flinn: TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Verastem: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics, Trillum Therapeutics, Abbvie, ArQule, BeiGene, Curis, FORMA Therapeutics, Forty Seven, Merck, Pfizer, Takeda, Teva, Verastem, Gilead Sciences, Astra Zeneca (AZ), Juno Therapeutics, UnumTherapeutics, MorphoSys, AG: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma, Agios, Calithera Biosciences, Celgene, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Incyte, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, Novartis, Pharmacyclics, Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Research Funding. Westin:Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; 47 Inc: Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Cohen:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; UNUM: Research Funding; Hutchison: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Lymphoma Research Foundation: Research Funding; ASH: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Akard:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Speakers Bureau. Jaglowski:Juno: Consultancy, Other: advisory board; Kite: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Sachs:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Ranger:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Harris:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Payumo:Unum Therapeutics Inc.: Employment. Bachanova:Celgene: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GT Biopharma: Research Funding; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Monotherapy Activity with the First CD20-Targeted Immunotoxin, MT-3724, in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Monotherapy Activity with the First CD20-Targeted Immunotoxin, MT-3724, in Subjects with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

A Longitudinal Evaluation of Euroflow and Combined Quantitative Immunoprecipitation (QIP) and Free Light Chain (FLC) Mass Spectometry (MS) in Functional High Risk Multiple Myeloma

A Longitudinal Evaluation of Euroflow and Combined Quantitative Immunoprecipitation (QIP) and Free Light Chain (FLC) Mass Spectometry (MS) in Functional High Risk Multiple Myeloma

Phase 2 Trial of LDE225 and Lenalidomide Maintenance Post Autologous Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma

Background: Lenalidomide maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and possibly overall survival in multiple myeloma (MM). However, almost all patients do relapse as a result of residual multiple myeloma cells that remain after the high-dose chemotherapy. In the myeloma setting it has been found that the hedgehog (Hh) pathway is essential for maintaining a subset of tumor causing stem cells. LDE 225 (Sonidegib) is a potent selective oral bioavailable antagonist of Smoothened (SMO), a component of the Hh signaling pathway. In in vitro experiments, LDE225 treatment of myeloma cell lines resulted in a modest inhibition of cell proliferation at increasing doses. When LDE225 was combined with lenalidomide, a more than additive effect was observed in terms of cell proliferation, an effect that was more pronounced in the context of myeloma cell lines growing in co-culture with marrow derived stromal cells. These findings form the basis of evaluation of LDE 225 as a strategy to enhance the activity of lenalidomide in the post-transplant maintenance setting. The minimal residual state post SCT provides the most optimal situation for evaluation of a drug that is likely to work by inhibiting the tumor cells that escaped high dose therapy. Methods: Multiple myeloma patients without evidence of progression, who were 60 - 120 days after a single autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), performed within 1 year of diagnosis were eligible for the study. Maintenance therapy was started approximately 3 months after SCT. Treatment consisted of lenalidomide 10 mg days 1-21 and LDE225 400 mg days 1-28 in 28-day cycles for a total of 18 cycles. The goal of the study was to assess toxicity of this combination, complete response rate (CR) progression free survival (PFS) at 1 and 2 year and overall survival (OS). CR and PFS were estimated using an exact binomial distribution and Kaplan Meier curves respectively. Results: A total of 28 patients were accrued from Jan 2014 to Aug 2016, 1 patient canceled prior to treatment and 1 patient was deemed ineligible resulting in 26 evaluable pts for CR and PFS. The median age of all pts (n=26) was 60 years (range 43-69) and 50% were males. Seventy-three percent of patients reported one treatment regimen prior to SCT, while 27% reported 2 or more prior regimens. The other characteristics of the patient are summarized in Table 1. Twenty seven pts received at least one cycle of treatment and are evaluable for toxicities (AE). Patients were treated for a median of 12.5 (range 1-18) cycles. While 10 pts (38.5%) completed protocol treatment (18 cycles), the remaining 16 pts went off treatment due to AEs (6, 23%), disease progression (3, 11.5%), refusal of further treatment (3, 11.5%) and other reasons (4, 15.4%). A grade 3 or higher AE at least possibly attributed to either drug was seen in 63%. Grade 3+ hematologic toxicities were noted in 30%, with 7% neutropenia and 4% thrombocytopenia. Notable grade 2+ non-hematologic toxicities with more than 5% incidence were dysgeusia 22%, alopecia 11%, and anorexia 7%. Grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicities were fatigue, myalgia and arthralgia each at 7%. The CR rate in evaluable patients was 46% (5 CRs and 7 sCRs) with a 95% CI of 27% - 66%. CR rate improved from 31% to 46%. VGPR or better improved from 42% to 85%. The 24-month PFS (time from SCT to progression or death due to any cause) was 73% (95% CI: 57.9 - 92.3%) with a median time to censoring of 38 months. Conclusion: Lenalidomide in combination with LDE225 as posttransplant maintenance therapy was associated with some toxicity but manageable. The combination improved the depth of response after autologous stem cell transplant. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine overall survival. Disclosures Lacy: Celgene: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy; Alnylam: Research Funding. Gertz:Ionis: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Kapoor:Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Russell:Imanis: Equity Ownership. Kumar:Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Sonidegib (LDE 225) is a selective oral bioavailable antagonist of Smoothened (SMO), a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway.

EARLY Results of TOTAL Therapy 7 (TT7): High Response Rates of NEWLY Diagnosed High Risk Myeloma to Daratumumab

Background. The TT approach has significantly improved the outcome of multiple myeloma (MM) by combining new drugs with a regimen that comprises induction, tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), consolidation and maintenance. However, a group of 15% of patients with high risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) have derived little benefit despite similar response rates to induction chemotherapy and ASCT when compared to low risk MM. The poor outcome of HRMM is explained by early relapse post ASCT resulting in a short progression free survival (PFS) with only 15-20% of patients surviving long-term. Daratumumab (Dara) is a human IgG1k anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody that has shown favorable results in early single-arm studies and more recently in phase III studies for relapsed/refractory and newly diagnosed MM. In TT7, we introduced Dara during all phases of therapy, including immune consolidation early post ASCT, to improve responses rate and PFS in HRMM. Methods. Patients had newly diagnosed HRMM as defined by high risk cytogenetic abnormalities, presence of extramedullary disease, >3 focal lesions on CT-PET, elevated LDH due to MM, or ISS II/III with cytogenetic abnormality. Dara (16mg/kgx1) was added to induction with KTD-PACE (carfilzomib, thalidomide, dexamethasone; and four-day continuous infusions of cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide). Conditioning for tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was with fractionated melphalan (50mg/m2x4) (fMEL) based on prior observations that patients with adverse cytogenetics fare better with fMEL rather than single high dose MEL200mg/m2.In the inter tandem ASCT period immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/kg) alone for 2 doses was followed by Dara (16mg/kg) on day 1 combined with K (36mg/m2) and D (20mg) weekly for 2 cycles. DaraKD was administered to avoid treatment free periods allowing for myeloma regrowth. The 2nd ASCT was followed by further immunological consolidation with Dara (16mg/k) for 2 doses, and maintenance therapy for 3 yrs with 3-months block of alternating Dara-KD (dara 16mg/kg day 1; K 36mg/m2 and dex 20mg weekly) and Dara-lenalidomide (R)D (dara 16mg/kg day 1; R 15mg day 1-21 q28 and D 20mg weekly). Results. TT7 enrolled 43 patients thus far. The median follow-up was 11 months (range: 1-22). The median age was 61 yrs (range 44-73). Sixteen patients were ≥65 yrs (37.2%). A mean of 29.4x106 CD34+ cells/kg (range: 4.6-86.4) were collected. 36 patients completed ASCT #1 (83.7%) and 18 (41.9%) ASCT #2, whilst 14 patients have proceeded to the maintenance phase. R-ISS II/III or metaphase cytogenetic abnormalities were present in 85.1 and 58.1% of patients, respectively. Elevated LDH or >3FL on CT-PET were noted in 30 and 41.8%. The 1-yr cumulative incidence estimates for reaching VGPR and PR were 87 and 83%, respectively. A CR or sCR was achieved in 68 and 46%. The 1-yr estimates of PFS and OS were 91.6 and 87.2%. 40 subjects are alive, whilst 5 progressed on study therapy and 3 subsequently died. 38 patients are progression free at the time of reporting. Dara was well-tolerated and no subjects discontinued therapy due to dara-related side effects. The CR and sCR rates compared favorably to the predecessor HRMM TT5 protocol where CR and sCR rates were 59 and 27%. Conclusion. The early results of TT7 point to increased response rates of HRMM to a dara-based TT regimen with especially higher rates of CR and sCR. Longer follow-up is required to determine if these early results translate into superior PFS and OS. Figure Disclosures van Rhee: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Adicet Bio: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Sanofi Genzyme: Consultancy; Castleman Disease Collaborative Network: Consultancy; EUSA: Consultancy. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Morgan:Amgen, Roche, Abbvie, Takeda, Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: research grant, Research Funding. Davies:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, Oncopeptides, Roche, Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Consultant/Advisor; Janssen, Celgene: Other: Research Grant, Research Funding.

Narcotic Use in Multiple Myeloma Patients at the Time of ASCT and One-Year Follow up

Background: Bone pain is one of the most common presentations of multiple myeloma and nearly all patients have skeletal involvement in the course of disease. Consequently, many patients require narcotics for symptom management at the time of diagnosis but the long term impact of MM treatment on pain control remains uncertain. With the advent of combination therapy for MM with novel agents followed by transplant and then maintenance therapy, clinical response is nearly universal and greater than 30% of patients achieve a serologic complete response. Therefore, we examined the impact of modern myeloma-directed therapy and high response rates on the use of narcotics up to 1 year after transplant in this group of patients. Methods: A retrospective review of data collected from the Rutgers-CINJ database was conducted. All patients who received induction inducing therapy (e.g. bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone or cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone) followed by high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and who had adequate post-transplant follow up (at least 100 days) were included. Morphine use was assessed at the time of transplant and at follow-up visits. All opiates (e.g. oxycodone, fentanyl, MS contin, etc.) where converted to morphine equivalents/day (ME/day) and recorded. Treatment responses were determined based on the International Myeloma Working Group Response Criteria. We compared the incidence and amount of narcotic use over time using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunn's multiple-comparison test. Results: 189 patients were included in the analysis. 38% were using opiates at the time of transplant. At 100 days post-transplant 35.5% were using opiates and at 1 year post transplant 30.9% were using opiates (p=0.04) . Average opiate use was 74.1 ME/day (95% CI: 55.2 to 92.9), 69.45 ME/day (95% CI: 50.5 to 88.3), and 70.78 ME/day (95% CI: 43.5 to 98) for each of the aforementioned time points (p=0.088) (Figure 1). For example, 74 ME/day would be equal to approximately 50 mg of Oxycodone daily. 74 patients were active opiate users at the time of transplant (Table 1). Response to myeloma treatment (remission, progression, relapse) was not different in opiate-using patients at the time of transplant or at 100 days and 1 year after transplant (Table 2). Conclusion : Early studies from the 1960's reported on the rapid reduction of bone pain in treatment responsive patients with MM (Hogstrata et al.). Recently, treatment modalities for MM have significantly improved, leading to markedly increased remission rates (>90%), progression-free and overall survival. With dramatically increased serologic responses, one would hypothesize that there would be a decline in pain and a subsequent decrease in opiate use. However, in this retrospective chart review we found that 30% of multiple myeloma patients continued to use opiates following transplant and that ongoing use of opiates appeared to be independent of clinical response. Interestingly, at the time of transplant active opiate users had a CR of 27.2% while the non-opiate using patients had a CR of 13.3%. Although there was a slight decline in the number of opiate users at the 1 year follow up, 33% of opiate users continued at their original level of opiate use and 22% increased their opiate use at 1 year post ASCT. Persistent long term use of opiates is of particular concern given that the survival of patients with MM has significantly improved with the use of novel agents and autologous transplant with an increasing number of patients surviving 10 years or more. In patients who have achieved an excellent response (e.g. serologic CR and negative PET scan), ongoing narcotic use should be addressed at each visit and other advanced pain management techniques should be considered. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Impact of Post-Transplant Consolidative Radiotherapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and a PET-CT Based Predictive Model for Relapse

Background Approximately half of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) will relapse despite curative intent therapy with salvage chemotherapy (SC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Consolidative radiotherapy (cRT) is used to reduce the risk of local relapse in high risk patients. We aimed to examine the (i) impact of cRT on outcomes, (ii) role of positron-emission tomography computerised tomography (PET-CT) imaging in predicting outcomes, (iii) identify a subgroup most likely to benefit from cRT, (iv) assess patterns of relapse to understand the mechanisms of treatment failure and (v) propose a PET-CT based risk stratification model for relapse. Patients and Methods 104 patients with R/R cHL treated with curative intent SC and ASCT between January 2000 and May 2019 were retrospectively identified from two sites in Melbourne, Australia. Fifty-six patients (54%) received peri-transplant cRT. SC consisted of chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy of the clinician's choice followed by interim assessment by PET-CT imaging. Patients with a complete or partial metabolic response proceeded to ASCT. Disease status was routinely evaluated by physical examination and PET-CT imaging at time of disease relapse, at completion of salvage chemotherapy, and at three months following ASCT. A complete metabolic response on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT was defined by Deauville Score ≤3 (uptake ≤ liver, PET negative) and compared to Deauville Score ≥4 (PET positive). Results With a median follow-up of 2.5 (range 0.2-15.2) years, the 2-year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 68.3% and 83.6%, respectively. Inferior PFS was associated with advanced stage (III or IV) disease at relapse (AS-R) (53% vs 78%; P=0.004) and PET positivity after SC (51% vs 79%; P=0.005). Compared to PET negative patients after SC, 2-year PFS was significantly inferior in patients who were PET positive and did not receive cRT (38% vs 79%; P<0.001) which lost statistical significance with the addition of cRT (Figure 1A. 58% vs 79%; P=0.12) despite patients in each RT cohort having comparable baseline characteristics. This potential PFS benefit was statistically significant for PET positive patients after SC with limited stage disease at relapse [LS-R] (Figure 1B. 91% vs 44%; P=0.007) but not for patients with AS-R (31% vs 25%; P=0.90). Patients who achieved a negative PET scan without residual tumor mass had superior outcomes following ASCT as compared to patients who are PET negative with residual mass ≥2cm and PET positive patients (Figure 1C. 86% vs 70% vs 51%; P=0.007). Although cRT was associated with a non-significant improvement in local disease in patients with AS-R (P=0.05), 3/5 (60%) patients with LS-R and 5/12 (42%) patients with AS-R who received cRT had subsequent in-field relapse post ASCT. Conclusion One third of patients with relapsed/refractory cHL who received SC and ASCT subsequently relapsed within two years. cRT may abrogate the negative predictive value of a positive PET scan after SC, of which patients with LS-R are most likely to benefit. PET positive disease and residual mass ≥2cm after SC are associated with inferior PFS despite the use of cRT. Conversely, patients who are PET negative without residual tumor mass after SC have superior outcomes. cRT is associated with improved local disease control, yet approximately half of patients who relapse after cRT will still have in-field relapse, possibly warranting the evaluation of higher cRT doses. Therefore, we propose a PET-based model which may identify the patients at "high" risk of progressing after ASCT who are most likely to benefit from clinical trials examining different modalities of consolidative therapy (Figure 1D). Validation of this model is required in a larger independent population. Disclosures Ritchie: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Beigene: Research Funding; Imago: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. MacManus:National Health and Medical Research Council Australia: Research Funding. Seymour:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria; Acerta: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dickinson:GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Maintenance and Consolidation Regimens after a Second Autologous Transplant for Multiple Myeloma: A Decade of Experiences

Introduction: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) followed by maintenance is the standard of care for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). For patients that relapse, a second ASCT remains a viable option. However, the maintenance regimen to use for such patients remains an unanswered question, particularly in those with prior lenalidomide exposure. We retrospectively analyzed patients receiving two autologous transplants for a diagnosis of MM at our institution from 2008 to 2018 to determine maintenance strategies and outcomes upon completion of a second transplant. Methods: A total of 189 patients received two or more autologous transplants for MM at our institution from 2008 to 2018. Patients with planned tandem transplants, or those that proceeded directly to another transplant without interval progression were excluded. The remaining 135 patients were analyzed. Results: Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. After first ASCT, 94 out of 135 patients (69.6 %) started maintenance therapy. The most commonly used maintenance regimen was lenalidomide in 63 patients, followed by bortezomib in 12 patients and thalidomide in 10 patients. Median time to initiation of maintenance from the date of transplant was 3.9 months. Overall median progression free survival (PFS) from transplant was 24.7 months with no significant difference between groups that received lenalidomide (median PFS: 21.2 months) or bortezomib (median PFS: 19.2 months, p:0.12). 10 (15.8%) patients discontinued lenalidomide due to toxicity, and 1 patient (8.3%) discontinued bortezomib due to toxicity. The median time from the onset of disease progression post first ASCT to time of second ASCT was 5.8 months. Strategies used post second ASCT includedconsolidation with triplet regimens followed by de-escalation (n=11) versus monotherapy (n=100). Table 2 highlights differing maintenance regimens used after the second ASCT. Median time from second ASCT to initiation of maintenance was 4.0 months. Median PFS post ASCT was 20.7 months. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the different regimens used (p=0.26), although there was a numerically higher discontinuation rate due to toxicity with older agents such as lenalidomide and bortezomib compared with newer agents such as daratumumab and pomalidomide. There was no statistically significant difference in the cytogenetic risk profile (p=0.21) or stage at diagnosis (p=0.36) between the groups that received different types of maintenance agents. However, patients receiving daratumumab as maintenance were more likely to have received more lines of therapy (median 5 for Daratumumab vs 3 for Lenalidomide, p=0.0001), and more likely to have previous exposure to daratumumab prior to second ASCT (92% vs 0% for other agents p=0.0001). Patients receiving daratumumab, carfilzomib or triple therapy were more likely to have been refractory to both a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) (p=0.0001). Despite stratifying for use of newer novel drugs (FDA approval after 2010- pomalidomide, daratumumab, carfilzomib) vs older novel drugs (FDA approval before 2010- lenalidomide, bortezomib, thalidomide), there was no difference in PFS ( 21.2 months vs 20.4 months, p= 0.92), between these groups when used as part of a maintenance strategy. Conclusions: Our data show a variety of maintenance and consolidation regimens are used for patients with MM after their second ASCT. In this single-center, retrospective analysis, there was no clear superiority of a consolidative strategy using triplet over monotherapy, and no superiority of newer agents compared to older agents. This suggests that toxicity, prior therapies and their tolerance may be the more important patient-related factors for consideration when selecting an agent/agents. Randomized, prospective data will be important to ascertain the standard of care in this situation. Disclosures Ganguly: Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kite Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board. McGuirk:Kite Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; ArticulateScience LLC: Other: Assistance with manuscript preparation.

Early Fever Detection By a Novel Wearable Continuous Temperature Monitor in Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction Neutropenic fever following high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a common (incidence 63-100%) and potentially life-threatening complication. Recommended time to antibiotic (TTA) administration is within 1 hr of fever onset with delays associated with significant morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and mortality. Standard of care guidelines emphasize patient self-monitoring for fever, with instructions to seek immediate medical attention if body temperature (temp) reaches 100.4°F or higher. In this study, we evaluated if a novel wearable, continuous temp monitor, tPatch, could reliably estimate core body temp and detect fever in an outpatient setting following ASCT. Additionally, we gathered preliminary data to explore early detection and prediction of clinically relevant temp rise in this clinical setting. Methods Patients (N = 86) with hematologic malignancies (62% multiple myeloma) who underwent high-dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT at Mayo Clinic, MN were prospectively enrolled between June 2018 and March 2019. Patients (82% male) wore an axilla-placed tPatch continuously for 7 days in an outpatient setting during the post ASCT period and were asked to record self-measured oral temp in 3-4 hr intervals daily using a standardized thermometer after appropriate training . Patients followed standard of care procedures with daily clinic assessment of temp, blood counts, and vital signs. An optional patient questionnaire was given at end-of-study. A model was trained using both patient- and clinic-assessed oral temp measures to estimate core temp from 2 sensors on the tPatch device. Core temp estimates and trends were then compared to patient- and clinic-assessed measurements. Fever was defined as a temperature ≥100.4°F for at least 1 hr. Results When compared to all oral temp reads, the tPatch estimated core temp within 0.03 ± 0.7℉. Among the 86 patients, clinic-assessed fever incidence was 29.4% while tPatch-assessed incidence was 58.8%. Using all clinic-recorded temp readings as "ground truth," the sensitivity and specificity of the tPatch algorithm in detecting fevers were 88% and 86%, respectively, while patient self fever detection sensitivity was 62% and specificity 93%. With "fever episode" defined as a temp ≥100.4°F for at least 1 hr, tPatch detected 9.6 times the number of fever episodes vs. clinic reads. The average lead time of tPatch detection of clinic-recorded fevers was 3.7 hours. In 25% of all intervals between clinic temp readings, either tPatch or patients detected at least 1 fever episode. The tPatch was well-tolerated, the only adverse events reported were grade 1 skin irritation and discomfort in 4 (5%) patients. Of 65 patients who completed the survey, 95% reported the tPatch as "quite" or "somewhat" comfortable and 94% stated no difficulty in using the tPatch. Exploration of tPatch temp trends over various time intervals for use in fever prediction is ongoing. Conclusions Patient self-monitoring of temp has low sensitivity and is not feasible for long intervals of time (e.g., overnight). Continuous temperature monitoring by a wearable device overcomes these challenges and has the potential to improve early detection and consequently shorten time to antibiotic initiation. A follow-up randomized study is planned to assess the clinical benefits of continuous temp monitoring through patient and clinician alerts triggering early clinical intervention for febrile neutropenia. Figure Disclosures Vera-Aguilera: Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding. Haji-Abolhassani:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Kulig:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Heitz:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Paludo:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding; Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Ghoreyshi:Verily Life Sciences: Employment. Scheevel:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding. Schimke:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding. Markovic:Verily Life Sciences: Research Funding.

Ixazomib or Lenalidomide Maintenance Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Consolidation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Large Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Trial

Ixazomib or Lenalidomide Maintenance Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Consolidation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Large Multi-Center Randomized Phase II Trial

Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy of Generic Melphalan Is Comparable to Innovator Formulation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

BackgroundHigh-dose melphalan (MEL) is the standard conditioning regimen used for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Generic MEL is routinely used in various transplant centers across the world including ours due to its reduced cost and ease of availability. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the clinical efficacy of generic MEL with that of the innovator formulation in MM patients undergoing ASCT. Patients and MethodsSixty-three patients diagnosed with MM receiving high-dose MEL were included in this study. MEL levels in plasma were measured using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) protocol and non-linear mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate the PK of the data. ResultsThe interindividual variability (IIV) in MEL area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and clearance (CL) were 4.39, 5.88-fold for generic, and 4.34, 6.85-fold for the innovator formulation, respectively. The median MEL AUC and CL were comparable between the 2 formulations. The population PK analysis showed age and creatinine CL as the only significant covariates explaining IIV in MEL AUC/CL. Analysis of MEL PK parameters with clinical outcome showed no significant differences in terms of onset and severity of mucositis, day to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, as well as response status on day 100 post ASCT between patients receiving generic or innovator formulations of MEL. In addition, neither MEL AUC nor CL was found to be associated with day +100 response. ConclusionOur study suggests that the PK and efficacy of the generic MEL is comparable to the innovator formulation.

Health-related quality of life is maintained with ixazomib maintenance in post-transplant newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the TOURMALINE-MM3 trial

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is important to consider in maintenance therapy post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) as patients have minimal disease burden post ASCT. The phase 3, double-blind TOURMALINE-MM3 study demonstrated improved progression-free survival with ixazomib maintenance vs placebo post ASCT (Dimopoulos et al, Lancet 2019) and is the first study to evaluate the impact of post-ASCT maintenance on HRQoL in NDMM.

Impact of consolidation therapy post autologous stem cell transplant in patients with light chain amyloidosis

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an effective therapy for eligible patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) and is able to induce deep and durable remissions. However, not all patients achieve a deep response after ASCT and the role of consolidation post ASCT in AL amyloidosis is not well defined.