Position Of Sling Research Articles

Midurethral sling position and surgical outcome: A meta-analysis.

There is still ongoing debate as to whether the outcome of the sling is determined by the position of the midurethral sling. In order to evaluate the potential impact of sling position on the outcomes of retropubic and transobturator sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence, it is necessary to conduct further investigations. We conducted a comprehensive search across various electronic databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE. Relevant data were extracted, organized in a table format, and analyzed using RevMan software for further analysis. This review comprised a total of 9 studies. The findings indicate that patients with TVT tape placement in the midurethra exhibited a slightly higher cure rate compared to those with proximal placement. Conversely, tape placement in the midurethra was associated with a significantly higher cure rate compared to distal placement [RR = 0.84, 95% CI (0.74-0.95), P < .05]. In the case of transobturator slings, tape positioning beneath the midurethra or distal urethra yielded better outcomes compared to placement near the bladder neck [RR = 0.74, 95% CI (0.57-0.94), P = .02; RR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.39-0.96), P = .03]. Based on 2D and 3D ultrasound imaging, differences in TVT placement appear to have minimal impact on the cure rate. However, the highest rate of failure after transobturator sling surgery is closely linked to the positioning.

The role of TVT position in relation to the pubic symphysis in eliminating the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and urethral funneling.

The introduction of suburethral sling was a breakthrough in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. The method is highly effective. However, the mechanism of action of a sling and the reasons for surgical failures are not fully understood. Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of sling-pubic symphysis distance on eliminating the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence and urethral funneling. Materials and methods: The analysis included 106 patients who reported 3 to 6 months after sling placement for a follow-up visit encompassing clinical examination and standard ultrasonography. We evaluated the position of sling in relation to the pubic symphysis, urethral length, as well as urethral funneling length and width. Results: Cure criteria were met by 91 patients. Elimination of urethral funneling was achieved in 76.9% (n = 70) of cured patients. Urethral funneling was still present, yet shorter by a mean of 10.2 mm (p = 0.02) than before surgery in the remaining cured patients. There was a 32.5% reduction in the mean relative length of urethral funneling (p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in the pre- and postoperative funneling width. The tape-pubic symphysis distance was lower in cured women: 23.2 mm vs. 26.1 mm in failed women (p = 0.04). Similar observations were made for cured patients with persistent urethral funneling vs. failed patients (22.47 mm vs. 26.0 mm, p = 0.027). There were no differences between cured patients without urethral funneling and cured patients with persistent postoperative funneling (23.5 mm; 22.5 mm; p = 0.417). Conclusions: Tape position in relation to the pubic symphysis is important for the elimination of stress urinary incontinence. Sling location closer to the pubic symphysis reduces the length of urethral funneling, but has no effects on its width in cured patients with persistent postoperative funneling.

Sonographic sling position and cure rate 10-years after TVT- O procedure.

AimTo examine the position of the TVT-O sling 10 years postoperatively and its association with outcome.MethodsA total of 124 patients who received a TVT-O sling at two centers in 2004 and 2007 were invited for follow-up. The position of the sling on perineal ultrasound was described relative to the bladder neck and the lower margin of the pubic symphysis at rest and on Valsalva. Objective cure was defined as a negative cough stress test at 300 ml. Subjective cure was evaluated with the Kings´ Health Questionnaire (KHQ), Incontinence Outcome Questionnaire (IOQ), Female Sexual Function Index Questionnaire (FSFI) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement score (PGII).Results78 of 124 patients (57%) were available for follow-up 10 years after surgery. I Eleven (14%) had undergone reoperation and were excluded. Tapes were visualized in the remaining 67 (54%) women. The subjective and objective cure rates in this sub-cohort were 67% (45/67) and 77% (52/67), respectively. In these 67 women the mean distances from the bladder neck to the proximal edge of the tape (BNTD) during Valsalva maneuver were significantly higher in cured women compared to the not-cured women (11.2 vs. 9.4mm). The distance between tape and urethra (TUD) was significantly lower in cured vs. not cured patients (2.6 vs. 4.1mm). All women with a TUD of >5mm (n = 5) were incontinent. Tape position was not associated with overactive bladder symptoms.ConclusionsTape position near the bladder neck and large distance to the urethra is associated with incontinence 10 years after TVT-O.

Repeat retropubic suburethral sling procedure is effective for recurrent female stress urinary incontinence.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of repeat retropubic suburethral sling for recurrent stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women. A retrospective review was performed of 35 women with SUI who underwent repeat retropubic suburethral sling procedures between May 1994 and November 2014. Treatment outcome was assessed directly or by telephone interview. Sling position and urethral incompetence during straining and coughing after the procedure were evaluated. The overall continence rate after repeat suburethral sling procedures was 60% (21/35). Among the 35 women, 19 underwent a simple retropubic suburethra sling procedure and 16 underwent combined suburethral sling and other pelvic floor surgery; the success rate for these 2 groups was 84.2% (16/19) and 31.3% (5/16; P = .001), respectively. The success rate was 60% in patients with normal detrusor function (n = 18/30) and in those with detrusor underactivity (n = 3/5; P = 1.0). For patients with intrinsic sphincter deficiency and bladder base hypermobility, the success rate was 63.6% (n = 14/22) and 53.8% (n = 7/13), respectively (P = .36). Among the 25 patients with transrectal ultrasound follow-up data, the success rate following placement of the second sling at the bladder neck, proximal urethra, middle urethra, and distal urethra was 50% (2/4), 87.5% (7/8), 36.4% (4/11), and 0% (0/2), respectively (P = .122). Repeat suburethral sling procedures for recurrent SUI are safe and effective. The position of the second sling at the proximal urethra resulted in a relatively higher continence rate relative to other sites.